Full transcript
0:01Joe Rogan podcast. Check it out.
0:03>> The Joe Rogan Experience.
0:06>> TRAIN BY DAY. JOE ROGAN PODCAST BY
0:08NIGHT. All day.
0:12>> I like that.
0:14>> Absolutely.
0:15>> It's also there's [music] some things
0:16that are so awesome. It's like that's
0:18awesome. [laughter]
0:19>> I I was I was trying to talk about black
0:21holes to some high school students just
0:23seriously earlier this week and I was I
0:25kept saying, you know, what the f
0:27[laughter]
0:28Yeah. So, I I got nothing to pitch, but
0:31I I uh um I the Shorewood Men's Club, I
0:33was giving a talk there. The Shorewood,
0:35Wisconsin is where I live. The men's
0:37club invited me to give a talk about
0:38astronomy last week, and when I
0:39mentioned I was coming to the show, they
0:41just freaked out. And so, the only thing
0:43I have is my Shorewood Men's Club uh uh
0:46uh water.
0:46>> Well, shout out to the Shorewood Men's
0:48[laughter] Club. That's awesome. [gasps]
0:50That's so cool that you give those
0:51speeches. I love your YouTube talks.
0:54They are fantastic.
0:55>> Oh, thank you. Wow. I have watched
0:59probably every one you've ever done.
1:01I've I've watched at least I mean how
1:02many have you done? I've done I've
1:04watched at least like 10 of them.
1:06>> Yeah. I mean, so I mean pretty much what
1:08I did at at NASA I did a lot of sort of
1:10the science spokesperson stuff and so so
1:13most of that was you know I I'm more on
1:15the NASA videos. I hosted like launch
1:17events. I haven't done much privately on
1:20YouTube. I'm I'm I'm thinking about
1:22starting some stuff. Oh,
1:23>> you should. I I'll Yeah, I'll work on
1:25that. Okay.
1:26>> 100%. [laughter]
1:27>> Thank you.
1:27>> 100%. You said so many things that made
1:29me just go, "What?"
1:31>> Ah,
1:32>> like here's a big one that you said. You
1:33were talking about if the size of Earth,
1:37if the Earth was the dot of an eye in a
1:39book in regular print.
1:41>> Yes.
1:42>> That the Milky Way galaxy would be as
1:45large as the Earth itself.
1:47>> Actually, a little bigger. Yeah. So, I
1:49mean, the thing is this is an
1:50interesting thing about science
1:51communication.
1:53>> [snorts]
1:53>> You say that if if the if the sun were
1:55the size of a dot of an eye and you got
1:57to remember you can fit a million earths
1:59inside the sun, right? This is a huge
2:00thing. So if that's the size of a dot of
2:02an eye on text, then the galaxy would be
2:05the size of the earth. That's when
2:06people's eyes get big and people respond
2:08to it.
2:08>> So it's not just the earth, it's the the
2:10sun. So if the sun was the dot of an
2:11eye.
2:12>> Yes, that's right. So let's let's make
2:13this clear. So the sun were the size of
2:15the dot of an eye on a page of text. So
2:17you could fit a million earths inside
2:19that dot of an eye, then the Milky Way
2:21galaxy would be bigger than the Earth.
2:24>> Yeah. I think
2:26>> So if the Earth was the dot of an eye,
2:28[laughter] then how big is the Milky Way
2:29galaxy? Cuz the sun is how many millions
2:32Earths
2:32>> volume wise, you could fit over a
2:34million Earths inside the sun. Yeah.
2:36Yeah. The the sun is about 800,000 miles
2:38across. You could fit about 110 Earths
2:40across it. The diameter. We do those
2:43things where you show the the
2:44differences between our sun and
2:46different stars and immense stars and
2:49you go bigger and bigger and bigger and
2:51you you get to the point where you're
2:52like I can't my this is not working. I
2:55can't get I can't process this. It's too
2:57kooky.
2:57>> There there's nobody that can process
2:59it. I mean I mean one one of the the the
3:01really kind of you know the thing about
3:02sort of demystifying scientists is the
3:04idea that our brains somehow work any
3:06differently and like we can visualize
3:09what a lightyear is, right? you know, a
3:10lightyear is about six trillion miles.
3:13That, you know, the distance light
3:14travels in a year. No, we're human
3:15beings. We we get used to using the
3:18terms. We get used to, you know, using
3:20the numbers, but but we've got the same
3:22brain as everybody else. Nobody can
3:24visualize what a galaxy really is. And
3:27you can take pictures of them. You can
3:29say the word galaxy, but people have no
3:32idea what what monsters these are. and
3:35and and then with like with the James
3:36Webb Space Telescope, you know, all of a
3:38sudden you're taking pictures of
3:39billions of them and you know, they're
3:43right in front of your eyes. This is not
3:45something that you can argue about. It's
3:47an image and and you see these these
3:50foggy hazes of of of stars, you know,
3:53basically so many stars you can't see
3:54them individually. And that's real. And
3:57and I mean, it still gives me
3:59goosebumps.
4:00>> That's awesome. [laughter]
4:02It gives me goosebumps, too. But it's so
4:04cool that it gives it to you and you
4:06actually study it your whole life.
4:07>> Oh, that's that's that's the whole
4:09point. I I mean, you know, working for
4:10NASA was a huge huge honor. And I mean,
4:13all of us there are doing this. I mean,
4:15we were all science fiction fans. We all
4:17love imagination. Um, you know, we
4:22that was the best thing about working at
4:24NASA was was the joy and and and the the
4:26teamwork and the camaraderie and the
4:28people that you're working with that uh
4:29you know, they they think this is the
4:30best thing in the world to do. Well, I
4:32mean, there's a a real problem that we
4:35have where I think that cities and light
4:38pollution have really for, you know,
4:42it's great that we have cities. It's
4:43wonderful. It's wonderful that we have
4:44all this electricity and that we can see
4:46things at night time, but boy, we have
4:48done ourselves a massive disservice by
4:49not being able to see the stars all the
4:51time. And I think people have kind of
4:53lost the wonder of it when you're only
4:54looking at it as images on your phone or
4:57when, you know, the only time you get it
4:59is on vacation. Occasionally, you look
5:00up in the sky. Wow, look at all the
5:02stars here. It's different here. This is
5:05something that everyone should be
5:08absolutely blown away by. At night, you
5:11have a vision of the most spectacular
5:13thing any human being has ever seen
5:15ever. Just the Milky Way galaxy alone.
5:17It's nuts. It's crazy to think that
5:20those are all stars and that you can't
5:23count them. It's insane. There's so many
5:25of them and it's above you every day.
5:27And we're just blas blas. We're just
5:29like so used to it. We're so dismissive
5:32of it. So it doesn't mean anything. It
5:33It's exciting when someone's excited by
5:36it because I'm like more people need to
5:38get the away from the cities and
5:39just go see how crazy this is that we
5:42are flying through space.
5:45>> Yeah, [laughter]
5:46it is profound. And to be that close, I
5:48mean just looking up, you don't even
5:50need a telescope or a pair of
5:51binoculars. The presence of something so
5:54much larger than you. But I mean, if
5:56you've if you've listened to some of my
5:57my podcasts, and I think you you know
5:59that the big deal for me is that you are
6:02such a part of this. You are such an
6:05intimate, intrinsic part of this. It's
6:07not we're separate from space. You know,
6:09we look up and there's something
6:10separate from us. You know, that's the
6:12story of us up there. you know, the the
6:14only way the universe makes atoms, the
6:17only way that makes, you know, the
6:18chemicals all around us, you know, the
6:20the aluminum, the iron, the oxygen, the
6:22carbon, you know, the phosphorus,
6:24everything that makes me up, you know,
6:25the only thing in the universe that
6:26makes atoms is the interior of a star.
6:29It's the only place where nuclear fusion
6:31puts atoms together. So, so everything
6:34that you are, the the story is up there.
6:37And, you know, so you're you're not
6:38looking at something separate and
6:40distant, you know. I mean astrophysics
6:42is the story of you know the end of your
6:44nose literally I mean I mean we are part
6:47of this beautiful bigger thing
6:49>> that's a weird concept the I mean that's
6:52from that old song you know we are
6:53stardust
6:54>> yeah we're golden to get ourselves back
6:58yeah um that that's real that's what we
7:00are and that's what all life is and that
7:02that's just a very strange thing for
7:04people to wrap their heads around as
7:06we're sort of slowly getting a greater
7:09and greater understanding of the
7:11complexity of the universe itself which
7:13is relatively recent in terms of h human
7:16history. I mean we really didn't know
7:19all all what we just we know now because
7:22the James Webb telescope is so crazy
7:25where they're seeing these new these
7:26galaxies they're confusing like why are
7:28they formed so early.
7:29>> Oh yeah. Oh I I I gave a talk about
7:31those just a few weeks ago. The the red
7:33dots. Yes. And they never let
7:34astronomers name anything. Right. You're
7:36seeing something so dramatic and they
7:37call it the little red dots, right? you
7:39know, or you know, there's a storm on
7:40Jupiter that's three times the size of
7:42the Earth with 400 mph winds, and they
7:44call it, you know, the red spot.
7:45>> How come no one's allowed to name them?
7:47>> Well, naming conventions, uh, well,
7:49they're they're complex. So, so if you
7:51if you discover a comet, you get to know
7:53if you discover an asteroid, you get to
7:55name it. If you discover a comet, the
7:57comet is named after you. But anything
7:59else has to be done by international
8:00committee. And so, you know, they they
8:03because of that, things don't end up
8:04with very interesting names. They all
8:05end up with, you know, catalog numbers,
8:07you you know, basically phone numbers.
8:09>> What do they call that weird hexagon on
8:11Jupiter? Is it a hexagon?
8:12>> Saturn. Hexagon. I think they call that,
8:15you know, the hexagon on Saturn. They
8:17don't even they don't really the
8:18hexagonal storm. It's fantastic. Uh you
8:21could fit about two Earths across that.
8:23And it it it's a it's a hex it's a
8:25hexagon jetream basically. You've got
8:28super fast moving winds around the pole
8:30of Saturn. and and Saturn is so cold,
8:33the gas is so cold that there's almost
8:35no friction in the gas. So unlike here,
8:38you know, the jetream here, there's kind
8:40of this joke. Oh, there's a picture.
8:42Hey, that's fantastic. Um,
8:44>> that's wild.
8:45>> One of my favorite pictures NASA ever
8:47took. If you look at the little dot in
8:49the middle of that, the sort of little
8:50eye of the storm. We actually have a
8:52picture from Cassini where you can see
8:54the sun glinting off of hundreds of mile
8:58high. There you go. It's down in the
8:59bottom there. It's in the bottom in the
9:00middle. Yeah, that picture. One more
9:03over. Yeah, that that that's a picture
9:04uh from the Cassini space mission.
9:06That's a real image.
9:07>> Wow.
9:07>> And that's the eye of that storm. And
9:10and those are, like I said, hundreds of
9:12miles high banks of clouds catching the
9:14sunlight and the poles of Saturn. And
9:16you know, we did that. We we went there.
9:19We flew over that storm.
9:20>> That's crazy. And uh uh and and yeah, I
9:22mean as amazing as the storm is, it's um
9:25it's at least fairly well understood as
9:28a very low temperature jetream. You
9:29know, I mean, you may be familiar here.
9:31People kind of joke about like, you
9:32know, the weather's the same. A week
9:33from now, the weather will be about the
9:34same as it is now. There patterns that
9:36get set up in in the jetream of the
9:37Earth and you you take away all the heat
9:39and all the friction and it forms this
9:41this beautiful storm.
9:43>> What why what is the theories why it
9:45forms a hexagon?
9:46>> It's it's something called a standing
9:48wave. the the the the the jetream
9:50basically sets up a wave inside this
9:52circulation and and I'm I I will admit
9:54I'm not an atmospheric specialist, but
9:56that that's what I know. And and and
9:58that wave kind of kind of makes this
9:59hexagonal shape and and then you cool
10:02everything down without friction and
10:03that's how the whole thing works. They
10:05they have done computer simulations of
10:08very fastm moving jet streams under the
10:10conditions of Saturn and you can get
10:11this sort of shape to set up.
10:13>> Wow.
10:14>> God, it's so fascinating. And it's so
10:16fascinating that we think of that as
10:18being so far away.
10:19>> That's just right in our neighborhood.
10:20>> It's just right there. It's super hard
10:23to get to. Takes a [laughter] long time,
10:25but it's just right there.
10:26>> Well, we're hoping to launch, when I say
10:28we, NASA's hoping to launch a new
10:30mission to one of the moons of Saturn.
10:32Uh hopefully in in like 2028. It'll take
10:34it something like, you know, six, seven
10:36years to get out to Saturn. But there's
10:37a there's that giant moon of Saturn,
10:39Titan, which has a thick atmosphere.
10:41It's the only place where the air
10:42pressure the air pressure is actually
10:44even a little bit greater than the room
10:45here. And uh um it's it's very cold. You
10:49know, it's it's you know almost close to
10:50300 degrees below zero, but it's got
10:52this thick atmosphere and tons of
10:53organic molecules and evidence of liquid
10:55water below the surface. It's one of the
10:57places that that might be friendly for
10:59life. And so they're they're designing,
11:00have you heard about this? It's called
11:01Dragonfly. It's a it's an octacopter.
11:03It's a big drone. There you go. Perfect.
11:06And so so so Dragonfly is going to be
11:09this big opticopter that we're going to
11:11land on this moon Titan. We've already
11:12landed on this moon once with the
11:14Cassini mission. And it's got this this
11:16really kick-ass uh chemical uh
11:19laboratory inside to look for the
11:21conditions for life, you know, anything,
11:23you know, that we might be able to find
11:24and and obviously sample more than one
11:26site. You actually fly around and and go
11:28to different places. There's rain, there
11:30are oceans, there are rivers. The only
11:31place we know there are open, you know,
11:33great lakesized lakes on Titan.
11:35>> Wow. Wow.
11:35>> But it's so cold that it's not uh liquid
11:38water. It's actually liquid natural gas.
11:39Liquid methane and ethane. Yeah. [sighs]
11:42Yeah. And again, you know, the the
11:45we we've already landed there. We
11:47actually sent a probe there as part of
11:48the Cassini mission to land on Titan. I
11:50mean, it's just badass that you know
11:53that that we humans have been there.
11:55That that's a that's an artist
11:56conception, but that's what it would
11:57look like. You know, we we sent a probe
11:59there. You know, it took a bunch of
12:00readings and then and eventually froze
12:02to death. But uh but but some of the
12:04readings that it took were intriguing
12:07about the possibility of life on Titan.
12:09>> Didn't the Russians land something on
12:11Venus?
12:12>> Yeah. Well, more than once. Yeah.
12:13They're the the Soviet Union is the only
12:15nation you former Soviet Union now that
12:17ever landed on Venus. And landing on
12:20Venus is way hard. [laughter]
12:22>> They [clears throat] got crazy pictures,
12:23too.
12:23>> The surface temperature is about a
12:24thousand degrees and the air pressure is
12:27similar to being about a mile below the
12:29ocean.
12:30>> That's a photo.
12:30>> Yeah, it's a photo. Yep. That's real.
12:32And it's a photo taken in a thousand
12:34degree temperature.
12:35>> Yes. [laughter] Didn't last long. But uh
12:38um everything is crushed flat. I mean
12:41the the landscape is just crushed flat
12:43by that you know huge pressure. Uh you
12:46know this incredible dense atmosphere.
12:48The clouds are sulfuric acid. That's why
12:50it looks yellow. That's real. Uh you
12:52know sulfuric acid clouds. I mean it is
12:53like you know classic vision of hell. It
12:56it's it's it's heavy and deep and uh and
12:59dense and sulfuric acid. What's so
13:02interesting too that our understanding
13:04of planets in terms of like just what's
13:06in our solar system, they're all
13:08different. They vary so much and this is
13:10just all we know about the known
13:12universe in terms of planets. Is it
13:14possible that there could be some
13:15planets out there that are set up
13:17completely different than the planets in
13:19our solar system?
13:20>> Oh, absolutely. Um, one of my favorite
13:22websites, just for fun, I mean, so the
13:24um, it changes every day how many
13:26planets around other stars we know
13:27about, we call them exoplanets, exterior
13:29planets. Um, I think we're up to about
13:335,000 that we know of.
13:34>> When did we start noticing them?
13:36>> Um, so this was at least detecting them.
13:38>> Yeah. Yeah. This is something I was been
13:40involved with ever since I was in
13:41college. When when I was in college, my
13:44uh my research adviser was a man named
13:45David Leam and he was trying to to find
13:48the first evidence. I mean, we we
13:49figured other stars have planets. I
13:51mean, it can't be just us, but but
13:53they're hard to see. They're tiny.
13:55They're dark. I mean, compared to a
13:57star, right? Right? I mean, planets
13:58don't glow themselves, right? So, they
14:00just reflect starlight. I mean, we we
14:02literally said it was like trying to see
14:04a firefly around a search light from 200
14:06miles away, right? How would you do it?
14:08And uh I mean, now we're actually
14:10getting so good at it, we find more
14:12every every week, almost every day. I
14:14mean, pretty soon it's going to be I I
14:16think thousands of new planets every
14:17single year. And um and
14:20>> do you have actual images? So, for the
14:22most part, we don't have images, but
14:24that doesn't mean we don't have really
14:25cool uh uh observations, including the
14:28chemistry of their atmospheres. This is
14:30really amazing to me. So, they're so
14:32tiny, it's hard to actually get a pixel.
14:34They're smaller than a pixel. But when
14:36these things pass in front of their
14:37star, right? So, there's a star and they
14:39they they pass in front of it. So,
14:41you're looking at this thing pass in
14:43front of the star, it makes a tiny
14:44little solar eclipse. It goes by, it
14:45blocks a little bit of the star light.
14:47And we find them that way. We find the
14:49stars twinkling as little planets go
14:51around them again and again. They have
14:53to come back three times for us to say
14:54it's a planet. Otherwise, it could be a
14:56spot on the star or something else. And
14:59um the the amazing thing is that the
15:02starlight will shine through the
15:03atmosphere of that planet and we can
15:05actually we can actually probe the
15:07chemistry of the atmosphere. So we find
15:09planets that have you know they're the
15:11size of the earth about the temperature
15:12of the earth. They have evidence of
15:14water vapor, carbon dioxide, oxygen. And
15:17then uh last year there was this
15:19fantastic controversial discovery. I
15:21mean it's it's very real. We need to
15:23follow it up. Um we think we're starting
15:25to see the evidence of organic
15:26molecules. It's it's it's it's not, you
15:28know, a very strong signal yet. And this
15:31this this was this was a press release
15:32from the James Webb Space Telescope. And
15:35there were some scientists that wondered
15:37if these could be organic molecules that
15:40that that might someday be traceable
15:41even to the presence of life. they they
15:43they resembled something that plankton
15:45might might give off on an ocean world.
15:48And then of course I the rest of the
15:49scientists said the data is not good
15:51enough yet. We need much better
15:53observations before you can say that.
15:55You know, we could maybe believe it's an
15:56organic carbon-based molecule, but we
15:58don't know which one it is yet. So, you
16:00know, I mean, stay tuned. I mean, I
16:02would never have thought the first
16:04evidence of life outside the Earth, like
16:07a really hard chemical scientific
16:09evidence, would be on a planet around
16:10another star. I thought we maybe find on
16:12Mars or on some of the moons of Jupiter
16:14and Saturn. But now with the James Webb
16:16Space Telescope and the telescopes that
16:17will come afterwards, we might be able
16:20to actually, you know, get get enough of
16:22a sense of the atmosphere of these
16:23planets to start looking for life
16:25science. Yeah.
16:26>> So the sun, the star is passing light
16:30through this little tiny thing that's
16:32smaller than a pixel and through the
16:34atmosphere where the light passes
16:36through. What are we using to detect
16:38that? It's a technique called
16:39spectroscopy and it's a really really
16:42powerful thing. I This is what most
16:43scientists do. As as beautiful as images
16:46are of a gorgeous galaxy or a star.
16:51That's not really what we do. We look at
16:52these little squiggly lines. We get very
16:54excited. We we let the light from the
16:57star pass through um a grading that that
16:59actually draws it into a rainbow. You
17:01take takes that white light. You've seen
17:02pictures of like prism, you know, dark
17:04side of the moon, Pink Floyd. You know,
17:06white light goes in, rainbow comes out.
17:08If you measure really really carefully
17:10how much light is coming in every color,
17:13you can tell astounding things. You you
17:15can tell how hot the star is, how fast
17:17it's rotating, uh in some cases, how far
17:20away a galaxy is. That's how we measure
17:22how far away they are from us in space.
17:24And you can measure the chemistry
17:26molecule by molecule. You can tell
17:28exactly what atoms and molecules are in
17:30that object. Here we go. Look at that.
17:33So what you're amazing person by the way
17:36that that's incredible. Thank you so
17:38much. Um [laughter]
17:40>> every every every element carbon,
17:42nitrogen, oxygen has a fingerprint in
17:45the rainbow and it's like you know it's
17:47that there's nothing else like it. You
17:49know that you see carbon and nitrogen if
17:51you see these colors of the rainbow
17:52shining at that particular light. And
17:55it's not just simple things like carbon,
17:57nitrogen, oxygen, but it's it's water
17:58vapor, carbon dioxide, um organic
18:01molecules. Everybody has their
18:02fingerprint in the rainbow. And so when
18:05when the starlight shines through the
18:07atmosphere, there you go. That's how we
18:09tell what these things are made of. You
18:10know, this is a dying star. This is
18:12actually in the Karina Nebula. And uh
18:14the most the one of the most luminous
18:16stars there is. And we we pass the light
18:18through a rainbow. And then looking
18:20really really carefully at how much
18:22light comes at every color, you can pick
18:23apart exactly what it's made of.
18:26>> Wow.
18:26>> Yeah. Did Did you know that you know
18:28helium you know the element helium,
18:29right? You you may be familiar that the
18:31the Greek the Greek sun god's name is
18:33helios. Helium is an element we
18:35discovered on the sun before we ever
18:37knew it was here in in in the the turn
18:39of the last century in the late 1800s
18:41when they were passing sunlight through
18:42a prism and they were looking at all
18:44these patterns of light. There was one
18:46chemical that we'd never seen before
18:47here. And so they named it after the
18:49sun, helium. It was on the sun but not
18:51here. We we never knew the helium was
18:53here. That was found later. It was later
18:55we found it, you know, in like, you
18:56know, a natural gas, you know,
18:58radioactive decay. Helium is such a
19:00light gas. It just leaves the Earth. It
19:01just doesn't stick around. And so, you
19:03know, helium, we saw this this pattern
19:05of colors in the sun's light. We were
19:07like, what what the hell is that? And it
19:09turned out to be a new element we'd
19:10never found before.
19:11>> What year was that?
19:12>> We should look this up. I don't know
19:14exactly, but if we Google what year was
19:16helium found, um, I'm sure we can find
19:18[laughter] it. Well, I mean, I've been
19:20thinking about helium balloons and
19:22people who, you know, suck helium, make
19:24their voice go really high.
19:25>> We didn't even know about helium until
19:27>> 1868. There we go.
19:29>> That's nuts. So, they figured out that
19:32there was helium in the sun in 1868.
19:36>> Long before we ever identified it on
19:37this planet.
19:39>> That is so nuts.
19:41>> Yeah. Just think what's out there. We
19:43didn't even know about helium. It's not
19:45just that it's what's out there, but
19:46that there's people out there that can
19:48figure out how to do that. In 1868,
19:51shout out to Pierre Jeansen,
19:54uh, a French astronomer who figured it
19:57out.
19:58>> When you when you think about, you know,
20:00I know that one thing you you you love
20:01is the idea of uh, you know, Einstein
20:03and time being different and all that.
20:06>> You know, they figured all of this out
20:08around like like 1908. It was more than
20:10a hundred years ago. And you know, we
20:12don't really even have a better thing
20:14yet. You know, I mean, they they they
20:16figured out that time isn't the way that
20:18we experience it just by really simple,
20:22brilliant thought processes,
20:24observations and some years ago, 100 a
20:26little more than 120 years ago. Yeah.
20:28Incredible.
20:30>> The idea that the faster you go, the
20:32slower time is is so hard to wrap one's
20:36head around. And one of the things that
20:38I heard you talking about, you were
20:39talking about GPS satellites
20:41>> and you were saying that GPS satellites
20:43because they're going about what are
20:44they going like 20,000 miles an hour or
20:46something like that. So actually if we
20:48want to break this down a little bit
20:49there there are a couple different
20:50effects about time and and one of the
20:53things that that you know NASA does is
20:55we you know calibrates the GPS
20:57satellites and the signal coming and and
20:58you wouldn't I mean I think I heard that
21:00I mean within within a day if we didn't
21:03take into account the time difference
21:05these things are in that we we'd be
21:07about six miles off I mean in a in a
21:09single day.
21:09>> That's crazy.
21:10>> Oh yeah it's it's a big deal.
21:11>> That's so crazy.
21:13>> Yeah.
21:14>> That's so crazy. And that's just above
21:17us.
21:18>> Time really is something. I mean, this
21:20this is not a theory. Time time is is is
21:23variable depending on how fast you're
21:24going and also how far off the Earth's
21:26surface you are or how I should say how
21:27far away from a big gravity body you
21:29are. In the case of the GPS satellites,
21:31there's there's there's two things going
21:33on. And it's it's it's kind of fun
21:35because it's actually the reverse for
21:36the astronauts. So, let's want to break
21:38this down. This is really fun. Okay.
21:42We have clocks that are so accurate that
21:44if you move about two feet above where
21:47you if we had a clock on this desk and
21:49then if we moved it up about two feet,
21:51we could actually detect time flowing
21:53differently because you're just that far
21:55away from the Earth's gravity. Just two
21:57feet. Your head and the and your feet,
22:01we spend most of our lives say standing
22:03up are actually going through time at
22:05slightly different rates. If the farther
22:07away you are from a gravitational
22:09source, I mean you you probably like
22:10movies like Interstellar, right? With
22:12with you know Matthew McConna,
22:13>> remember the big black hole? And the
22:15closer they get to the big black hole,
22:17the slower time goes.
22:18>> That's not a theory. That's something we
22:20can actually measure with clocks. And a
22:22black hole has so much gravity it does
22:24it a lot more dramatically. But it's
22:26happening right in this room. Seriously,
22:28your head is in a different time frame
22:30than your feet right now.
22:31>> That's nuts.
22:32>> Yeah. And you and I mean it's
22:33measurable. you you you need extremely
22:36accurate clocks. But in the case of the
22:39GPS satellites, the GPS satellites are
22:41in what we call a medium orbit. They're
22:42not as far away as the geostationary
22:44satellites, but they're they're not
22:46actually going that fast. They're only
22:48going about 9,000 m an hour around the
22:50Earth. The the astronauts in the space
22:52station, by the way, are going much
22:53faster. They're they're going more like
22:55let's say approximately 20,000 mph. So,
22:57the GPS satellites are going a little
22:59slower and and Yeah. Okay. 8,000 m an
23:01hour is is a lot. And that does slow
23:03your time down, but the bigger effect
23:05for GPS satellites is how far away from
23:07the Earth they are.
23:09>> Wow.
23:09>> We're actually going slower in time than
23:11they are because we're closer to the
23:13Earth's gravity. And they're so far
23:15away, they're actually going a little
23:16faster than we are in time. Now, they're
23:19also slowed down by their fast velocity.
23:22The the faster you go, the slower your
23:24time goes. But people don't realize
23:26there's another factor and that's how
23:28far away you are from gravity. For the
23:30astronauts, the astronauts are closer to
23:32the Earth, right? So they're actually
23:33not so far away as the satellites and
23:35they're going much faster. So for the
23:37astronauts, it's the it's the motion.
23:38It's the time dilation from the motion
23:40that's a bigger effect. Uh if you are on
23:42the space station for a year, you come
23:44back about 1/100th of a second younger
23:46than you should be. [laughter]
23:47And uh you know, obviously that's not a
23:49big deal, but it's easily measurable.
23:51>> Wow.
23:52>> And in the case of the satellites, you
23:54wouldn't get the right location. The
23:55data wouldn't be right unless we take
23:56into account two things. How fast
23:58they're going. The closer to the speed
24:00of light you go, the slower time goes.
24:02But also how far away from the
24:04gravitational pull of the Earth they
24:05are. The the closer you are into
24:07gravity, the slower time goes.
24:09>> I think the weirdest thing that I've
24:10ever heard anybody say is that all time
24:12exists currently.
24:15>> That's Einstein. I mean, that goes back
24:17that goes back 120 years.
24:19>> That's such a bizarre thought. We don't
24:22know if it's true but but it's I mean
24:24Einstein really thought there wasn't
24:26much of a way around it because he said
24:28okay well if everything is going at
24:30different velocities compared to
24:31everything else right I mean it's a
24:33great question a kid can ask how fast am
24:35I going through space you know and the
24:38earth you if you're on the equator of
24:40the earth that goes around at about uh u
24:42you know about about 1 th000 miles an
24:44hour you know and then you know we go we
24:46go around the sun at about 67,000 miles
24:48an hour in our orbit the sun's going
24:50around a galaxy about half a million
24:52miles an hour around the galaxy. The
24:55galaxy is going towards a galactic
24:56cluster at more than a million miles an
24:58hour.
25:00But you know how fast are we going
25:02really? And the the only thing you can
25:05measure is how fast are you going
25:06relative to something else? There's no
25:08answer.
25:10You know, how fast am I going? Well, I
25:12mean, am I still or am I actually
25:13traveling close to the speed of light
25:14right now? I don't know. So, so Einstein
25:17said the only way he could really think
25:18about how that would work is if the
25:20universe was just one big thing. You
25:23know, all of time and space exists in a
25:25big whole thing. There's only one now.
25:29Einstein famously said, "The past,
25:31present, and future are, you know,
25:33persistently annoying illusions."
25:36Now, again, do we know this to be true?
25:40At the moment, we don't have any better
25:41physics. And and I doubt the physics
25:43will get any less weird than that.
25:46But yeah, I mean I mean that's sort of
25:49the way modern physics thinks the
25:50universe may be is is a big whole thing
25:54that started from beginning to end and
25:56is all nowish.
25:58>> But if that's the case, so subjectively
26:01we can measure
26:04things. We can measure time but but what
26:08are we measuring
26:10if it's I mean are are we
26:12[clears throat] making artificial time
26:14constraints? Are we are we doing it
26:15oursel? When we're when we create a
26:17clock, we create a watch
26:19>> and the watch is, you know, 24 hours a
26:21day it's running. What is it what is it
26:24measuring?
26:25>> Yeah.
26:26>> Right.
26:27>> That is exactly the question Albert
26:29Einstein asked. That that is that is a
26:31deep excellent question.
26:34And and so that was the problem. I mean
26:36in a famous thought experiment, Einstein
26:38made a clock by setting up two mirrors
26:40and having light bounce between the two
26:41mirrors. And that was the tick of the
26:43clock. Tick tick tick tick tick. And and
26:46the problem was that, you know, that's
26:47how he started thinking about the speed
26:49of light is that if you had this thing
26:50in a spaceship that was going a huge
26:51fraction of the speed of light, then a
26:53person standing watching it go by would
26:55actually watch the light kind of trace
26:57out a pattern like this because you it's
26:59it's it's actually ticking between the
27:00mirrors, but the mirrors are moving
27:01along. And so you see the light make
27:03this sort of bouncy movement. And that
27:05means it's actually traveled farther
27:08than the person on the ground who thinks
27:09that the mirrors are just sort of the
27:11the light is making just a straight up
27:12and down line from mirror to mirror.
27:14That that question that you asked is
27:16what completely
27:18I mean it completely revolutionized
27:20physics. Everything fell apart when
27:22people said, "How do you even measure
27:24time? What does it mean to make a clock?
27:27What are we measuring?"
27:29>> I still don't understand what we're
27:30measuring.
27:31>> Oh lord. [laughter] Yeah.
27:32>> I I get it. I mean we I don't know if I
27:35have an answer for you. I don't think
27:36anybody does. But but but here's the
27:38deal. So the the clock in Einstein's
27:42experiment, so the the clock has, you
27:45know, two mirrors and there's light
27:46bouncing between it and then that's the
27:48distance that it travels in one tick,
27:49>> right?
27:51But now you put this mirror, you put
27:52that clock on a spaceship and the
27:54spaceship's going really fast. And as it
27:56goes by, you see that that that clock as
27:58as it streams by you really fast, you
28:00see the light make this motion.
28:02And and this line is actually longer
28:05than that line. This this line if you
28:07measure it, that's actually a longer
28:09line that I drew than the the original
28:11one between just the two mirrors because
28:12now it's at an angle.
28:14And this is what made Einstein say time
28:17has to change. If anything moves, the
28:20tick of a clock changes. What? However
28:22you measure time, whatever time is,
28:24whether you measure it with a bouncing
28:26clock or whether you measure it with a
28:27vibrating atom like we do in the Bureau
28:29of Standards, or whether you measure
28:31with a spring that's slowly unwinding in
28:33a wristwatch.
28:36Anything you can do to measure one
28:38moment to the next changes when motion
28:40is involved. There's no way to get
28:42around it. It's not just the
28:44measurement. It's time itself is
28:47changing. any way we have to measure
28:49this thing we call time. And I have to
28:52tell you, Joe, I I don't think we have
28:54an answer to what time is. What are we
28:57measuring?
29:00I think I think right there, I think
29:02you're asking for the next revolution in
29:04physics that we don't have yet. I really
29:06mean that. So when we're measuring time
29:08currently, like when I w look down on my
29:10watch, I'm measuring time in this
29:14particular space, like where I am, what
29:17altitude I'm at, how fast I'm moving,
29:21>> and the watch just does a reasonable job
29:23of calculating all that.
29:25>> And that's and that's you. I mean,
29:26that's what you see here, sitting still
29:28with your watch looking at it.
29:29>> If someone's flying by at close to the
29:31speed of light,
29:32>> they won't see you measure time the same
29:34way. Yeah. But you said something else
29:36too that freaked me out that [laughter]
29:39that if you traveled at the speed of
29:41light, the the problem would be you
29:43would have infinite mass.
29:46>> Well, anything with mass. Yeah. Yeah.
29:48That's the thing.
29:48>> So, if a person was in a spaceship and
29:51it traveled the speed of light, that
29:52spaceship would have infinite mass.
29:55>> It's basically it's what makes
29:57accelerating up to the speed of light
29:58impossible. That anything with mass
30:01can't travel at the speed of light. I
30:03mean the the equations blow up. But what
30:04does infinite mass mean? Do you have
30:06more mass than the whole universe? What
30:07the hell is that? As you approach the
30:10speed of light, if you have mass, it
30:12takes more and more energy to accelerate
30:14you even just a little bit more. So you
30:15never get to the speed of light. You
30:17know, you're speed you're going 99.9%
30:19the speed of light. Okay, I want to go a
30:21little faster. It it takes more and more
30:23energy each little tiny step you make.
30:25So it's it basically you never get to
30:27the speed of light. It it takes an
30:28infinite amount of energy.
30:30So, you know, when it comes to things
30:32like interstellar travel, I I I don't
30:35think we're ever going to take a
30:36spaceship and accelerate it to the speed
30:38of light, I I I mean, I we might get
30:41very close. There are particles in space
30:43that do have mass, like nutrinos, tiny
30:45little bits of mass. They travel very
30:46close to the speed of light, but they
30:47don't travel at the speed of light.
30:50But to me, you know, I I think that the
30:53the the idea of traveling interstellar
30:56distances or even intergalactic
30:57distances, you know, the thing that
30:59starts to really get me is the question
31:00of this this what is space and what is
31:02time at all? Quantum entanglement,
31:04>> right? Glad you brought that up.
31:05>> Oh, yeah.
31:07Uh I I [laughter]
31:09I'm going to say I I hope your listeners
31:11I I I I don't want to get I don't want
31:12to I I want people to come along with
31:14us.
31:14>> Oh, they're coming along.
31:16>> Yeah. I I don't want to say things that
31:17sound so stupid. They're like, you know,
31:18why are they saying this? So, please
31:20stop me if we need some more background.
31:21>> This does not sound stupid in any way,
31:23shape, or form,
31:24>> but the idea of quantum entanglement, we
31:26should explain that to people.
31:28>> Yeah.
31:28>> And what it essentially means is that
31:31things are entangled, they're connected
31:33at regardless of the distance.
31:35>> Yes.
31:35>> And it could be an immeasurable amount
31:38of distance like
31:39>> any distance
31:39>> like
31:40>> Yeah. Literally the beginning of the
31:43universe distance like 13.8 8 billion
31:46life years away distance.
31:48>> You're entangled with that.
31:50>> It's amazing because once again, let's
31:52go back to the idea that this this is a
31:54real experimental fact, right? I mean, a
31:57lot of times this this crazy stuff that,
31:59you know, scientists will will say this
32:01stuff and and people hear it, you know,
32:03for the first time and they say, "Well,
32:04that that sounds like idiotic. That
32:05sounds stupid. Why where did they get
32:07that from?" And the the idea that time
32:12changes is now it's one of the most
32:15commonly proven facts every day. Like I
32:17said, we needed to calibrate the GPS
32:18satellites. It's easy to measure.
32:21Quantum entanglement was something that
32:23that even Albert Einstein 100 years ago
32:26um he understood that quantum mechanics
32:28was pointing that way, but he really
32:29didn't like it. He called it he called
32:31it spooky action at a distance. He hated
32:33it because he realized that quantum
32:35mechan mechanics had this implication
32:37that that if things could somehow be
32:39connected quantum mechanically, you
32:41could take them any distance away from
32:43each other and they would somehow be
32:44able to respond to each other
32:46instantaneously with with no time
32:48difference.
32:49And you know, he didn't think that would
32:51ever actually happen. And then back in
32:52the in the in the mid 1990s, we started
32:54to do experiments with atoms and we
32:57found out that it was real. That uh uh
33:00it it can start off pretty simply. you
33:02you have two atoms that are in an orbit
33:04around you know so an atom has a nucleus
33:07of protons and electrons in the middle
33:09sorry [laughter] an atom has a nucleus
33:12of protons and neutrons the electrons
33:14are flying around in orbits around the
33:15uh the atom um two electrons can be in
33:19the same orbit only if they are spinning
33:21in different directions they they have
33:22an an angular momentum it's called spin
33:25and the only way these two electrons can
33:26fit in that orbit together is if they're
33:28spinning one is spinning in an upward
33:29direction one's say spinning in in a
33:31downward ction. Hate the broken finger.
33:34Um, so if if you take these electrons
33:36out of the atom and you can do that, you
33:39know that they're in different spins
33:41because they had to be to be in that
33:42that orbit together. So now you separate
33:44them. You can separate them by any
33:46distance you want. You can separate them
33:47by centimeters in a laboratory. The
33:50Chinese have done this up to the space
33:51station that they run in back. You you
33:53could conceivably do it to another
33:55galaxy. If you take those electrons and
33:57you separate them, you know that they
33:59were spinning in opposite directions. So
34:01if you take an electric field and you
34:02change the spin of one, the other one
34:05immediately changes in response
34:07>> regardless of the distance.
34:08>> Regardless of the distance and we know
34:10this to be true. We've done this. And
34:14the amazing thing is the universe is
34:16saying these two things are the same
34:19quantum mechanical system. They're
34:21basically the same object. They're
34:22connected to each other. They're
34:23entangled together. And it doesn't
34:26matter. Space and time don't matter. You
34:29can you separate them in space any
34:32distance you want. How does that work?
34:35The universe says the space and time
34:36between them doesn't matter. They're the
34:38same system.
34:41To me, that's the real intriguing thing
34:43about you. Could a civilization learn
34:45how to harness that, you know, you're
34:48not really even having to worry about
34:49traveling from one part to another. Have
34:51did you watch the um uh the threebody
34:53problem show? Yeah. So, so you have
34:55these things called sons, right? and
34:57sofans are entangled to this alien
34:59civilization and they can respond
35:02instantaneously because they're
35:03entangled. Yes. I mean I mean that's
35:06fantastic science and as far as I can
35:07tell that that could be theoretically
35:10possible. Yeah.
35:11>> Well, that's what's bonkers is that we
35:14are made out of all this stuff that's
35:16entangled.
35:17>> What's it entangled to? Is it entangled
35:18to stuff inside a black hole right now?
35:20Is it entangled to stuff that is on the
35:22other side of the universe from us? If
35:24the big bang had all of this stuff in a
35:26small volume at once, are we entangled
35:28to everything in some way?
35:33>> Seriously.
35:34>> Seriously.
35:34>> I mean I mean are is a part of me
35:36quantum mechanically right now in the
35:38Andromeda galaxy? Yeah, actually that
35:41would be the implication.
35:43I mean talk about
35:46I don't think we understand yet what
35:47reality is. I really don't. What does it
35:51mean? Are we all somehow the same
35:53particle entangled to each other? You
35:56know, are we connected to everything
35:59all at once?
36:01I mean, that could be where physics is
36:04taking us now.
36:05>> That's bananas. It's very difficult to
36:08think about when you you think you're a
36:11person in Austin. My feet are on the
36:13ground. Yeah.
36:13>> Here I am touching this desk. I'm going
36:15to get in my car later and go get
36:17something to eat.
36:17>> No kidding. You got to feed the cat,
36:19right?
36:19>> Yeah. But that's not really what's going
36:20on.
36:22It's way more complex, way bigger. And
36:24you were speculating that that could be
36:27how some advanced, super advanced
36:30intelligent life form travels.
36:33>> It's always been more compelling to me
36:35than the idea of taking a spaceship and
36:37traveling somewhere.
36:38>> That seems super crude.
36:39>> Yeah.
36:40>> That seems like the idea of making a
36:42horse fly.
36:43>> Yeah. Yeah. I I you know we we we talked
36:46about that movie Interstellar because
36:48there were a lot of good teaching
36:49moments in that movie for for a
36:51physicist. You know the idea that time
36:52really does slow down close to a black
36:54hole. And again we we observe this when
36:56we observe things orbiting close to a
36:58black hole. You can tell that that
36:59happens and the idea that this advanced
37:02civilization that we never actually see
37:04in the movie somehow communicates
37:05through basically space and time itself
37:08through gravity. Um, you know, that's
37:10how Matthew McConna is able to even like
37:12go back, you know, in time and space to
37:14help his daughter solve, you know,
37:16gravity and all that. You know, I was
37:18like I was like, I wonder I wonder if
37:20that's really more what it be like, you
37:22know, advanced civilizations.
37:24I mean, you got to think, right? I mean,
37:26you look around the earth and there are,
37:28you know, things like grasshoppers and
37:29hamsters that are fantastic, incredibly
37:32complex beings, but I mean, you try to
37:34teach them quantum mechanics or ask them
37:35to, you know, crochet a blanket or
37:37whatever. They they don't have the
37:38capacity. And you you've got to think
37:40that there's the similar jump where I
37:43mean, we don't even know the right
37:44questions to ask that sort of a
37:46civilization,
37:47>> you know? I mean, can they see the
37:49universe as a whole thing? Do they know
37:51that they're connected to everything?
37:53And can they somehow use that to travel?
37:56You know, maybe.
37:57>> Maybe. And if you just extrapolate, if
37:59you just think about where we've gone
38:02from primitive man to what we're
38:04currently experiencing, and you take
38:06that thousands of years, millions of
38:09years, whatever it is,
38:10>> yeah,
38:10>> you you keep going. And as long as
38:13civilization
38:15gets rid of war and figures out a way to
38:17not die of disease and natural disaster,
38:19you could potentially continue this
38:22process of technological innovation for
38:25millions of years. And you would imagine
38:26that it would go exponentially
38:29greater and greater in its ability to do
38:31things.
38:32>> Yeah. and its ability to
38:34not just
38:37not even things that we can imagine like
38:41we have a crude understanding amazing
38:44understanding of the universe but crude
38:47in comparison
38:48to what's potentially out there. Well,
38:51we could pot we could potentially be
38:54observing
38:55in a physical way every planet on every
38:58star one day.
39:01But we're not we can't even think of
39:03that as being a possibility now. But but
39:06what we're doing right now is insane to
39:09people that lived in the 1400s.
39:10>> Yeah.
39:12If
39:12>> you showed someone from the 1400s a
39:14nuclear power plant, they'd be like,
39:16"What the are you guys doing?"
39:18Like, "What is this?" See, if you showed
39:19them a nuclear detonate, if you showed
39:21them FaceTime on a phone, they'd be
39:23like, "This is insanity."
39:25>> I just got on a little metal tube and
39:26came here from Milwaukee and I'll fly
39:27back tonight. Yeah. Yeah. Absolutely.
39:30>> And we're just accustomed to it. It it
39:32it becomes normal. And it would become
39:33normal as technology increased further
39:36and further and further. And this idea
39:38that the entire universe would be
39:41accessible is just bananas. Have you
39:44ever wondered if maybe [clears throat]
39:46the real followon to humanity someday
39:48will be some form of AI?
39:50>> I think so.
39:51>> I mean, yeah. I I mean, I do wonder if
39:53the human brain is just kind of limited.
39:55I mean, if you if you say there are
39:56multiple dimensions and time is
39:58something that changes. I mean, I just
40:00said that, you know, I mean, scientists
40:02are no better than anybody else at
40:04comprehending a big number or a big
40:05amount of space. We just kind of get
40:07used to it, you You know, I mean, I
40:08mean, will we have a creature someday
40:10that we've created, an AI that then all
40:13of a sudden can comprehend these things,
40:16you know, is is is that really the real
40:18evolutionary path of humanity?
40:20>> Yeah, I think so. I think it's just a
40:23completely different kind of life and
40:24that we're thinking of it as artificial.
40:27I don't think it's artificial at all. I
40:29think it's a life. It's a just a
40:31different kind of life that we're
40:32>> It's an earthling. I mean, I mean,
40:33seriously, it's our children. We we
40:35created this.
40:36>> Yeah. I always describe ourselves as
40:38like we're an electronic caterpillar and
40:41we're making a cocoon. We don't even
40:43know why we're doing it because it's
40:44just what we do. I mean, the thing about
40:46human beings is we've always been
40:48completely fascinated with innovation.
40:51I've always said that if you looked at
40:52us objectively for some like what does
40:54this species do? Oh, they make better
40:56things. They keep making better things.
40:58They're never satisfied with the things.
41:00Bees made the beehive and like I think
41:01we got it, boys. [laughter] This is it.
41:04we're not satisfied at all. And so if
41:07you just kept going with that, like
41:08where does it go? Well, it has to go to
41:10life. It has to go to some sort of a
41:13human created new kind of life form that
41:16exists out of the components of the
41:18earth, but instead of being born out of
41:21evolution and out of, you know, natural
41:23mutation and natural selection, it's
41:25random mutation. It's made out of us. We
41:28made it and it'll probably make better
41:31versions of it. And that would be the
41:33new life. And that's how you get over
41:35all the biological hurdles that we have.
41:37You think about like the things that
41:38trouble us, war and crime and violence
41:41and all these different things that are
41:43a real problem with the human race.
41:44Well, that all goes away when you stop
41:46being human.
41:48And if we really are entangled with
41:51everything, we that will be us.
41:54It'll just be us in a completely
41:56different realm.
41:57>> Yeah. I I I mean I I do like this idea
41:59that what we call AIs now isn't
42:02something separate. I mean they are our
42:03children. It is an Earthling. It is
42:05something we've created.
42:07The the question I've often wondered is,
42:09you know, sometimes I think sometimes we
42:12lack imagination about what might be
42:14possible. I've always enjoyed science
42:15fiction where the AI also learn about
42:20about love or about the arts or about
42:22creativity. I mean whether you want to
42:24go with like the new battlest star
42:25galactica or whether you want to go with
42:27um uh a pretty profound experience I had
42:30with a friend of mine who's an author
42:31who has colear implants and you know he
42:34realizes that he doesn't hear like a
42:36human you he mean the colear implants
42:39don't replicate perfectly what it means
42:41to hear the way our ears do they bypass
42:44our ears they they wire directly into
42:46his brain and stimulate the experience
42:48of sound
42:50and so he's hearing in his words like a
42:52cyborg
42:53This is Michael Chorus, a wonderful man
42:55that did some essays about this. And and
42:58he he talked about how much um emotional
43:00response he has to music now, something
43:02he could never experience. How being a a
43:05cyborg, quote unquote, you know, and
43:07experiencing something in a non-human
43:09way has added joy and depth and and
43:13passion,
43:15you know? Are are we so sure that
43:18technology makes us more and more, you
43:20know, kind of 1950s robot-like, or could
43:23it take us into new experiences of being
43:24connected with each other, you know, new
43:26ways of loving each other, new ways of
43:28understanding things? I mean, I mean,
43:30does it have to be all bad? This
43:32>> Well, all of our differences fall apart
43:34if we realize we're all one thing.
43:36>> Yeah.
43:36>> If we realize we're all one thing, then
43:39all of our
43:41monopoly of resources, all that, all
43:43that stuff goes away. If we realize
43:45we're all one thing. I mean, part of the
43:46problem with human beings is we're very
43:48selfish.
43:49>> And the reason why we're very selfish is
43:51because that's how you had to survive.
43:52If you wanted your genes to if you
43:54wanted to to survive and you wanted your
43:56genes to be passed on to the next
43:58generation, you had to be selfish
43:59because other people were being selfish
44:01too. And that's the game the humans were
44:02playing. If we get to a point of
44:04universal telepathy,
44:07like universal telepathy with a
44:08universal language where all human
44:10beings are sharing thoughts, there are
44:12no secrets. We are all one thing.
44:14Everyone's terrified of that. People
44:16love secrets. Love I don't want people
44:18listening to my phone. I don't want
44:19people Well, I don't I don't either
44:21because it would be people doing that
44:23and those people have their own ulterior
44:24motives and it's gross that they would
44:26have control. They'd know your emails.
44:29But what if there's no secrets? It's not
44:32possible because our understanding of
44:34each other is now complete.
44:36>> Mhm.
44:37>> It's like we read each other's minds in
44:40a sense, but it's much more complex than
44:42that. and much more much more in depth
44:45like you feel what that person feels.
44:48You are that person and we're all one
44:50thing that that could be possible
44:54through technology. And this is this is
44:56where I have hope where a lot of people
44:59are like very fatalist with AI and you
45:01know they look at it in this dystopian
45:03sense of these oligarchs these technical
45:05oligarch technology oligarchs going to
45:07be controlling off through AI and
45:09they're going to have access to it and
45:10power. I don't know if anybody's gonna
45:13control it. And I have a feeling it's
45:15going to be kind of like the internet in
45:17a way where I don't think they really
45:18thought what the internet was going to
45:19be. I think they had this understanding
45:21of being able to exchange information
45:23through universities and I think it got
45:26to a point where I if they knew what the
45:29internet would be today and how little
45:31control they would have over the
45:32population and narratives and I think
45:34they probably would have shut it down a
45:35long time ago.
45:36>> [snorts]
45:36>> I have a feeling that's going to be the
45:38same way with AI and especially AI as it
45:43integrates with us, which I think is the
45:45only way that the human species really
45:48truly survives. Otherwise, we're just
45:50this archaic biological entity living in
45:53this new world of this ultra superior
45:57life form. But if we integrate with that
46:00thing through wearables, implants,
46:05engineering, if we figure out a way, and
46:08this is going to sound terrible to
46:10anybody who loves being a person, but
46:12all the flaws of being a primate,
46:15there's a lot of these biological reward
46:17systems that are built into us that are
46:19really problematic for progress. I mean,
46:21the reason why are we at war right now?
46:23Well, because there's people with
46:25certain ideologies and there's resources
46:27and there's people that are making money
46:29from their military contractors and
46:32there's politicians that are beholden to
46:33certain interests and then what are we
46:35doing? We're doing the same stupid
46:36that we've been doing for thousands and
46:37thousands of years. Well, how do we get
46:38past that? We get past that by stop
46:40being people.
46:42>> I think you may be right. I mean, again,
46:44that that future is is it is frightening
46:47in some ways, but I I'm I'm I'm more
46:49interested in the imagination. I mean,
46:51instead of just the dystopia, what could
46:53this mean,
46:53>> right?
46:54>> You know, I mean, I mean, how much more,
46:56like we said, I mean, when we were
46:57little tribal groups, you know, the
46:59little wars we had, the skirmishes
47:01didn't really hurt the planet as a
47:02whole. I mean, now we're getting there
47:04so many people and we're still having
47:06these little tribal skirmishes and and
47:07now we're in danger of of, you know,
47:09massive destruction. I mean, we can't
47:12just keep going this way. I mean, it's
47:14it's it's not it's not survivable.
47:15>> It's not. So I mean you know could AI
47:18help us you know tap into some kind of
47:19group consciousness. I mean when we we
47:22were talking about Einstein's idea that
47:24the universe may all be this one big
47:25thing you and this is pure metaphysics
47:28pure conjecture but you know even when I
47:30was a little kid and I heard that I
47:31wondered well you know if all time and
47:33space happens at once is there need for
47:35more than one consciousness even are we
47:37all are we all just looking out of you
47:39know one consciousness looking out of
47:40out of everybody's eyes simultaneously
47:43and not just humans but everything in
47:45the universe you know it's it's a
47:47spectacular idea that you know If there
47:50is a moment, if the universe is just one
47:52big thing, you know, we are part now,
47:56even now, of
47:58beings we have no names for, you know,
48:01super advanced beings that have figured
48:03all of this out and can span the
48:05universe with their consciousness, you
48:07know, that's part of the eyes, too.
48:09That's another part of this
48:10consciousness that we're part of right
48:11now. If if if there's one instant,
48:15you know, it it reminds me of some of
48:16the tenants of, you know, of Buddhism.
48:19There there might be these perfectly
48:20enlightened beings, bodhisattvas, and we
48:22are past lives of them. We're all
48:23existing at once.
48:26You know, it's a it's a fantastically
48:27beautiful idea.
48:28>> It is a beautiful idea. And our survival
48:31instincts are attuned to maintaining
48:35what we are. There there's this thing,
48:37well, I don't want to lose being a
48:38person. But I guarantee you if you went
48:40to an australythecus
48:42and you could somehow communicate to
48:44them, listen, you're going to change and
48:46you're going to be this thing that gets
48:48sick seven times a year and maybe you're
48:50obese and maybe you have a problem with
48:52cigarettes and you know, maybe you drink
48:54too much and you like to gamble and
48:55you're going to your life up here
48:57and there, but you're going to have a
48:58cell phone and you're going to live in a
49:01city and you're going to be breathing
49:02break dust every day and you, you know,
49:04your doctor's going to give you a bunch
49:05of stuff you don't really need because
49:06he's trying to make money.
49:08The Australians are probably like, "Fuck
49:10that. [laughter]
49:12I know what I'm doing here. Sounds much
49:14better."
49:15>> Yeah. I I know where the food is. Like,
49:17get out of here. I don't want any part
49:19of that. And I think that's just part of
49:22survival instincts. Survival instincts
49:24don't want you to radically change into
49:26something completely different with its
49:27own new set of problems.
49:29>> You you want to stay. You want to
49:31maintain. You know, country boy can't
49:33survive. Keep me in the woods. You know
49:34what I mean?
49:36people have this like natural
49:37inclination to keep things simple cuz
49:39they understand them.
49:40>> But I think that's not possible anymore.
49:43And I think we're going to just have to
49:45let it go. Just let that idea go and
49:48relax and uh accept whatever this new
49:51thing is. And I think we're very very
49:54fortunate to be born at this time while
49:56we're experiencing it as regardless of
49:59the outcome. This is a very unique time.
50:02like one of the weirdest times I think
50:05objectively in human history
50:07>> and we're very fortunate to be
50:08experiencing it.
50:09>> I mean you and I are are roughly the
50:11same age and you know I I I think that I
50:13mean for for me having this what they
50:14now kind of you know call the fearal
50:16childhood right where I was unplugged
50:18and and there were you know there were
50:19there were vast stretches of time even
50:21as a small child where I was on my own
50:23you know in the neighborhood stuff and
50:24and I loved it. I mean, I remember going
50:26to, you know, a YMCA camp when I was 11
50:28years old and, you know, everybody had
50:30to show up at breakfast and then there
50:31was an activity time and everybody had
50:33to show up at lunch. But what you did
50:34between that time, you were on your own.
50:36I mean, as an 11-year-old kid, you know,
50:38in the woods, there were activities, you
50:39could do some archery, there was a
50:41rifle, there was craft shop, there was
50:42swimming, and you had to check in at
50:44certain times. But sometimes I just went
50:46and sat in the woods, you know, 11 years
50:48old. I mean, can you imagine?
50:49>> I had this similar experience in the Boy
50:51Scouts.
50:51>> Yeah. Yeah. And you know the thing was
50:53you know so so you and I had this
50:55experience of living unplugged and and
50:58sort of the the idea of of of a quiet
51:01mind and imagination
51:04and but we also saw this tremendous
51:06change and this connectivity which I
51:08love. I mean I also love having the
51:10internet and this my cell phones and all
51:11of that but but but this is a real
51:14change in human civilization that we
51:16went through personally
51:18and I agree with you. I I feel a
51:20tremendous sense of gratitude for for
51:22both ends of my life.
51:23>> Right. We could have been born in the
51:241500s were the 1500s to the 1600s.
51:28>> Not that much changed. I mean
51:30>> for a lot of people. Yeah.
51:31>> Sure. I mean politically things changed,
51:33leaders got overthrown, but as far as
51:35like the way you interfaced with the the
51:37world
51:38>> pretty much the same way. You wrote
51:40stuff down with feathers. [laughter]
51:43>> Yeah.
51:44you know, and and gratitude and like you
51:46said, I mean, maybe instead of all the
51:48dystopia and all the worry and all the
51:50panic right now, you know, going forward
51:51with gratitude.
51:53>> Yeah. Well, I think the unknown gives
51:55people a tremendous amount of anxiety.
51:57>> Sure.
51:57>> For a good reason, you know, I mean, the
51:59unknown could potentially be dangerous
52:01and scary and terrifying or awesome and
52:03you really don't know and so you're
52:05like, what is it going to be? And
52:07there's all these college kids that are
52:08really freaking out because they're
52:11they're went into debt. They're getting
52:13these co college degrees. They're
52:15leaving with this burden, this financial
52:17burden that they can never get rid of.
52:19And on top of that, they have a degree
52:21that might not be worth anything because
52:23AI might completely eradicate their
52:25field. That's a real concern. And so
52:28they they I think kids today that are
52:30graduating from college and graduating
52:32from high school, they probably have the
52:34most amount of anxiety about the future.
52:36That and then there's people that, you
52:38know, they haven't saved any money up.
52:40They don't even know if money is going
52:41to be valuable in the future. Like what
52:43does it even mean? Are are we gonna
52:45abandon all money? Like what what is
52:47what is it going to mean when AI
52:49completely controls all of the
52:50resources, all of the government, all of
52:52everything, all transportation, and you
52:55don't have to do your job anymore? You
52:56just get some funds from the government
52:59where you can buy food. Like this is
53:01what people are talking about. Like this
53:02is a potential, you know, 100 years from
53:05now future.
53:06>> Very seriously so. Yes. Absolutely.
53:08which is terrifying to people that are
53:10thinking, hey, you know, I want to do
53:12what my dad did and what my mom did and
53:15I want to go out there in the world and
53:17I want to find something that I'm
53:19passionate about and make it a career
53:21and like maybe that's not possible. That
53:24to kids right now, I think is really
53:27freaking them out because the adults,
53:29the people like us that are supposed to
53:31be the ones that say, "Well, let me tell
53:32you how it all works. You're going to be
53:34fine. This is what you have to do." And
53:35if you do that and just cross your eyes
53:37and dot your tees, you're going to be
53:39okay, Bob. But maybe you're not going to
53:40be okay. Like maybe we don't know
53:43because that's the reality. The reality
53:44is you and I, the adults, have no idea
53:47what this world's going to look like in
53:4850 years. And these poor kids are they
53:51have no one to turn to. There's no one
53:53that can explain what this and so
53:55they're entering out into the world
53:57having to take care of themselves for
53:58the very first time with this real
54:00possibility that there might not be any
54:02jobs.
54:05On the on the flip side of that, are you
54:07in fact describing the Star Trek
54:09universe, right? You know, a time where
54:11people do not work for everybody has,
54:13you know, anything they need as far as,
54:15you know, apparently survivability, you
54:17know, food, whatever. You know, and now
54:19you have a chance to say, am I going to
54:20be a writer or an explorer or an artist
54:22or a captain or a musician?
54:24>> Yes.
54:24>> You know, I mean, does it does it I mean
54:26I mean I mean is there something in that
54:28that might be hugely liberating?
54:30>> 100%. And I've talked about this as well
54:32that this idea that you have to toil and
54:35you have to be a hunter gatherer or you
54:37know some that you have to do this in
54:39order to find meaning in life is kind of
54:40crazy because we could find meaning a
54:42lot of ways. There's very wealthy people
54:45that never have to work that have
54:46tremendous meaning in their life because
54:48they're doing things all the time
54:49without thinking about work at all.
54:51They're not thinking about it as work.
54:52whatever hobbies they're pursuing or
54:54interests or education they're pursuing,
54:57they're doing it just out of pure
54:58interest and fascination and love and
55:00passion. And that could be all of us.
55:04But there's going to be a tremendous
55:06transition period where people are going
55:08to have to rethink what it means to be a
55:11human being in society. And that's
55:14what's weird because our entire society
55:16is structured out of getting up in the
55:18morning, putting in the work, working
55:20towards a future. You got a 401k, you
55:23got investments, you got this, you got
55:24that, you got a mortgage. And this is
55:26how we've structured our entire
55:29existence and what we what meaning we
55:32gather from life. It's based on that.
55:35We're going to have to figure out a way
55:37to realize and to rethink this. And it's
55:40going to be very difficult for people
55:41that are like 40 and 50 that are just
55:44completely set in their ways and now
55:47their ways change. And I don't know how
55:49many of them are going to be able to
55:50make that switch and what could be done
55:53to assist them in that what can be done.
55:56And maybe that that comes with whatever
55:58this technological interface is. Maybe
56:00that comes with when we become what's
56:03essentially a cyborg that you get a a
56:06much greater understanding of what it
56:08means to exist. And that this idea that
56:10you exist only because the insurance
56:12company you work for is kind of
56:14ridiculous. And we abandon that. I mean
56:17the in the way that now when you open up
56:19your phone and you use perplexity, you
56:22have access to uh
56:25something that's as smart as every human
56:27being on earth in every field. You can
56:30ask it about anything and it'll give you
56:33the state-of-the-art and whatever the
56:35science is, whatever the the
56:37understanding of history, whatever
56:39mathematics,
56:40tax law, whatever it is, it can give it
56:43to you on your phone instantaneously.
56:46And we've just sort of accepted that.
56:48This is our new thing. And I think this
56:50is like a baby step into what it's going
56:52to what this technology could
56:55potentially if you're looking at things
56:56with a glass half full. It could
56:59potentially change the way we look at
57:01everything, the way we look at
57:03ourselves, the way we look at what it
57:04means to be a person and what we find
57:06meaning out of. And this because that's
57:09the problem. The problem is meaning and
57:10the the the feeling like you matter,
57:12feeling like you're important. And I
57:14think part of that is because we're all
57:15so isolated from each other. But that
57:17might go away entirely if the boundaries
57:21between all thought and consciousness.
57:23If we realize like, oh, consciousness is
57:25just a thing that we're all enveloped in
57:28and what our brain is is just a antenna.
57:31It's like tuning into consciousness. And
57:33the depending on how good your antenna
57:35is, you're going to be a little bit
57:36better about how you interface with the
57:39world and whatever thing you desire and
57:41whatever thing you decide to put your
57:43energy and attention to, you maybe
57:45you'll be better at it than another
57:46person because you have a better
57:47antenna. But we might understand that
57:49like we are really truly all one thing.
57:52So all our fears about
57:56you know finding your place in the world
57:58that might be nonsense.
58:00>> I really like that idea. I like the idea
58:02of search for meaning and I agree with
58:04you. I think that as as like you said as
58:06you know Australopythecus as people that
58:07used to exist in these little tribal
58:09groups and families
58:11um the the the modern isolated life. I
58:14mean it's something that I struggle with
58:16a lot. You know I I I'm always wondering
58:18you know where is my family? Where are
58:20my friends?
58:20>> Right?
58:21>> You know I I've had to to do a lot of
58:23sort of interior work about you know I'm
58:25just going to bring along my own
58:27>> family inside somehow. you know, I I had
58:30to provide this all for myself. The idea
58:32of being of being less alone, being less
58:35isolated.
58:36That's one thing that I wanted from the
58:38internet. You know, it started out on
58:40Facebook. I could I could keep up with
58:41my friends, you know, I I saw what they
58:43were doing. They were posting pictures
58:44of their life. It was it was less
58:45isolating. And then now it's evolved to
58:48I can't even find them on Facebook
58:49anymore. It's all, you know, all all the
58:51ads and everything like that. But
58:53[snorts] but but but I mean, for me, I
58:55mean, you you talk about meaning and you
58:57talk about solving isolation.
59:00Tell me tell me more about that. I I
59:02mean the the the how has your sense of
59:04meaning in your life evolved? How has it
59:06changed over your life? How how do you
59:08find meaning?
59:10>> I find meaning in what? Well, there's a
59:12bunch of things, right? First of all,
59:14it's the people that are in your life.
59:16This is a a giant factor because without
59:19people that you love and people that you
59:21enjoy spending time with, life loses all
59:24of its value. If you're an insanely
59:26wealthy, insanely successful person who
59:29has no friends, who lives alone, you're
59:31living in hell. And if you are a poor
59:33person that has amazing friends and
59:35you're just getting by, you are a
59:36happier person. But I guarantee that
59:39poor person would switch places with
59:40that rich person in a heartbeat because
59:43we're programmed to think that success
59:45is numbers. That success is what you can
59:49what you can accumulate as far as like
59:51objects and desired material
59:53possessions.
59:55But it's not. It's like true success is
59:57happiness and the the amount of joy that
1:00:01you get out of life and the amount of
1:00:02satisfaction you get in what you do. So
1:00:04I think for everybody that answer is a
1:00:07different answer because for some people
1:00:08it's going to be music. For some people
1:00:10it's going to be lit. They're going to
1:00:11write they're going to there's going to
1:00:12be a thing that you enjoy putting
1:00:14yourself into that you feel satisfaction
1:00:17and you feel meaning on top of friends
1:00:20and family. So friends and family I
1:00:22think is foremost, but then they can get
1:00:26in the way too if they don't have their
1:00:27together. So like they have to have
1:00:29a thing that they're enjoying as well.
1:00:32They have to have a thing that's helping
1:00:33them grow as an individual. And there's
1:00:36a thing from martial arts. My instructor
1:00:38told me that when I was very young that
1:00:39I never forgot that was martial arts is
1:00:41a vehicle for developing your human
1:00:43potential. And that if you find things
1:00:46that test you and you find things that
1:00:48are complex and these puzzles that you
1:00:50have to solve, the more you do that, the
1:00:52more you get of an understanding of who
1:00:53you are and what you can do and what you
1:00:55can do out there in the world. And the
1:00:56more you do it, the more you can do
1:00:58other things. And I think that's where I
1:01:01find meaning. I find meaning in doing
1:01:03things and enjoying time with my family,
1:01:06enjoying time with my friends, having
1:01:08joy and fun and laughter and then also
1:01:13difficult pursuits. I like things that
1:01:16are complex, the things that are hard to
1:01:18solve. I like things that are hard to do
1:01:20where I I really have to force myself to
1:01:23do it and then I feel satisfaction
1:01:25afterwards and I understand my ability
1:01:26to force myself to do things and in
1:01:30doing that I find meaning and uh I'm a
1:01:33relatively happy person. I think I'm
1:01:36very happy in terms of like the average
1:01:38person. I think that's why. But if
1:01:42someone just took that all away, if all
1:01:44that's gone, would you still have
1:01:46happiness? Like what is happiness,
1:01:48right? What is meaning? And what is it
1:01:52entirely connected to your job? That
1:01:55seems kind of crazy because a job is
1:01:57just a constructed thing that it would,
1:02:00you know, 500 years ago didn't even
1:02:01exist. So what do what it do? We have to
1:02:05have mean are we these complex
1:02:08problem-solving biological organisms
1:02:11that have this thirst for innovation and
1:02:13to constantly make things better?
1:02:17Are we tricking ourselves with jobs to
1:02:21to be happy? Are we filling the need of
1:02:24whatever? Like when a cat chases a ball,
1:02:26what is it doing? What thinks it's
1:02:28killing something? That's its design.
1:02:30This is its biological need. You throw a
1:02:32ball past a cat, it goes after it
1:02:34because it's got this biological need to
1:02:37chase things that are running away from
1:02:38it so it could kill it and eat. And I
1:02:40think we're kind of doing a similar
1:02:42thing with our hunter gatherer tribal
1:02:45organism that we're still trapped in
1:02:48that we're we're tricking it. We're
1:02:50tricking it with complex problems and
1:02:52we're tricking it with community. We're
1:02:54tricking it with all these different
1:02:55things that that keep it happy.
1:02:57>> I agree with you. Yeah, I I think that's
1:02:59that's a wonderful answer. I mean, there
1:03:01there's something about the, you know,
1:03:02the the happy poor person, isolated rich
1:03:04person thing that I I I I agree with.
1:03:06But at the same time, you know, seeing
1:03:08what grinding poverty does to people's
1:03:10minds and breaking them down with
1:03:12exhaustion and and demoralization, you
1:03:14know, there there's obviously some kind
1:03:15of a a sweet spot for there. You know, I
1:03:17mean, I I've had to work quite hard in
1:03:19different parts of my life.
1:03:21>> And I I was just very aware of of the of
1:03:24the [laughter] of the soul grinding, you
1:03:26know, not having enough, not wondering
1:03:28where your next meal is coming from. and
1:03:29and and I have it nowhere near as bad as
1:03:32some. But, you know, the the thing that
1:03:34was absolutely for me um unbelievable
1:03:37about working for NASA was the idea of
1:03:39solving complex problems with people you
1:03:41trusted and people that you thought
1:03:43really had your back and and no
1:03:44organization is perfect. But, you know,
1:03:47the idea that there is it's not a zero-
1:03:49sum game, right? I I mean, you want the
1:03:51whole team to succeed. I mean, even if
1:03:53there are missions you think should have
1:03:54been lower priority or maybe we should
1:03:56spend more money on this and less money
1:03:57on that, at the end of the day, you you
1:04:00want whatever is going on to be
1:04:02fantastic and you want it to succeed and
1:04:03you want all the people around you to
1:04:05succeed. And the idea that again, I
1:04:08mean, this isn't hunter gathering, you
1:04:10know? I mean, we're we're we're solving
1:04:11problems. We're saying, you know, can
1:04:14you take a picture of the black part of
1:04:16a black hole? You know, can you actually
1:04:18see the light area, the event horizon
1:04:20getting sucked in? I'm talking about the
1:04:22event horizon telescope, not a NASA
1:04:23mission. But, you know, there were times
1:04:26in my life like when I first saw that
1:04:27picture come together and I didn't think
1:04:31they'd be able to do that. I don't think
1:04:33people really understand what happened
1:04:34there. They they they were doing
1:04:36something right on the on the on the
1:04:39fuzzy edge of physics being possible.
1:04:42You need to catch the same front of a
1:04:45wavelength of light, right? So, light's
1:04:46coming by. It's a wave. It travels at
1:04:48the speed of light. the wavelength of
1:04:50light is tiny. Let's say for a minute,
1:04:52you know, that they they were they were
1:04:54dealing with with microwaves. So, let's
1:04:56say like a millionth of a meter. So,
1:04:58something that's a a me a meter divided
1:05:00by a million is traveling past you at
1:05:02the speed of light.
1:05:05And the Earth is is round and the Earth
1:05:07is moving. And they had they had these
1:05:09eight observatories all around the
1:05:11planet. And they had to catch that same
1:05:13wavefront, the same one. If it was if it
1:05:16was one wavefront later, one one
1:05:19millionth of a meter later traveling at
1:05:20the speed of light, they wouldn't have
1:05:21gotten the image. They needed to catch
1:05:23the same wave wavelength, the same
1:05:25photon, the same wave of light had to be
1:05:28caught in all of those telescopes at
1:05:29once. One was at the South Pole, some
1:05:31were in the in the United States, some
1:05:33were in Chile. They were all over the
1:05:36planet. And if you caught the same
1:05:39freaking wave of light,
1:05:41>> here it is.
1:05:41>> There you go.
1:05:42>> Wow.
1:05:44>> They they managed to make a telescope
1:05:45that's actually as big as the Earth. And
1:05:47they were able to take a picture of the
1:05:49dark parts of a black hole. Now, now
1:05:51that's that's something called the
1:05:52shadow of the event horizon. It's
1:05:54basically the event horizon where time
1:05:56and space stop. We don't even know if
1:05:58there really is an interior to a black
1:06:00hole. All the equations blow up. Time
1:06:01and space don't exist in there. and and
1:06:04light. Nothing can escape that darkness.
1:06:07The uh the black spot you're seeing
1:06:09there is a little bigger than the event
1:06:10horizon itself. It's called the shadow
1:06:12of the event horizon because um time and
1:06:14space are bent around the black hole.
1:06:17And so some of the light that actually
1:06:19gets sucked in is light that would have
1:06:21gone around the black hole. It gets
1:06:22sucked into the back end of the black
1:06:24hole. Literally space and time curve
1:06:26around the black hole. And so that that
1:06:28dark part is actually a little bigger
1:06:30than the event horizon. It's called the
1:06:31shadow of the event horizon. And um they
1:06:34said they were going to go take a
1:06:35picture of it. And I was like, you have
1:06:39to catch the same wavefront of light
1:06:43in all of these telescopes. I mean,
1:06:44that's going to depend on the height of
1:06:45the mountain, how fast that part of the
1:06:47Earth is moving. They did it. They
1:06:49did it. [laughter] And they they
1:06:51they didn't do it just once, right? And
1:06:54you know, and and and now we can take a
1:06:55picture of an area right in front of
1:06:57your eyes where space and time doesn't
1:06:59exist. I mean to a to a lesser extent,
1:07:03one of the NASA missions that I thought
1:07:04was just spectacular was a small
1:07:06inexpensive mission called NICER. Uh
1:07:09you're like, who's the nicer person?
1:07:10Nicer NICE R. It's the Neutron Star
1:07:13Interior Composition Explorer. And a
1:07:15neutron star. You probably know about
1:07:17these, but but you know, if when a star
1:07:19dies and the nuclear reactions inside a
1:07:21star cease, all of that gravity of this
1:07:24massive object comes crushing in and
1:07:27it'll create an object sometimes called
1:07:29a neutron star. They're about 20 miles
1:07:31across, but they have about twice the
1:07:33mass of the sun. And we study many of
1:07:35these at NASA. They're they're they're
1:07:37all over the place. They're real.
1:07:39They're something you can take a an
1:07:40image of, you can take a picture of. And
1:07:42you know, these neutron stars have
1:07:44physics that we don't understand. You
1:07:46you take you take two times the mass of
1:07:47the sun, you crush it into 20 miles. We
1:07:50know that we can't describe the interior
1:07:52of that thing yet. You know, we don't
1:07:54have the physics that matches that type
1:07:55of density. And um this this this this
1:08:00crazy little little contraption, I mean,
1:08:02it's about the size of a washing
1:08:03machine. It was built in a lab just on
1:08:05the floor that I used to work at at
1:08:06NASA. It's cheap, easy to make. I
1:08:09shouldn't say easy, uh, but I mean it
1:08:11it's actually able to create maps of
1:08:13what the surface of these objects are
1:08:15like. They're 20 miles across. They're
1:08:17thousands of light years away.
1:08:20And you can actually create a map of
1:08:21what the temperature is like. And one of
1:08:23the things we see on these maps is the
1:08:26distortion where space and time curves
1:08:28around these objects. You know, they'll
1:08:30they they rotate very fast and there are
1:08:32hot spots we see coming in and off the
1:08:34the neutron star. But then as the
1:08:36hotspot goes behind the star, the light
1:08:38bends up and over and we can actually
1:08:40still see the hotspot because space and
1:08:42time are bending around these objects.
1:08:44You can see that that that's not a
1:08:47mathematical simulation. That's not a
1:08:49theory. You can see space and time
1:08:52bending around these objects. You can
1:08:54see space and time bending into that
1:08:56event horizon. You know, I mean, it's
1:08:58absolutely crazy what we've been able to
1:09:01do. And whether it's a you know a huge
1:09:03project like the event horizon telescope
1:09:05where I I I would have bet that they
1:09:07would not have been able to make that
1:09:08measurement and they did you know there
1:09:11there were so many hard drives of data
1:09:14uh one of the uh one of the telescopes
1:09:15was at the south pole and uh you wanted
1:09:17you wanted the telescopes to be as far
1:09:19apart on the earth as possible because
1:09:20then you could basically make a giant
1:09:22telescope the size of the separation of
1:09:24these telescopes and uh um there wasn't
1:09:27I mean there's there's pretty good email
1:09:28links down to the South Pole but but the
1:09:31email link wasn't fast enough for all of
1:09:32this data. They they sent back literally
1:09:34there was a ton a ton of hard drives to
1:09:38actually they had to play them all at
1:09:39the same time and make sure they caught
1:09:40the same photon. If they had caught
1:09:43seriously one photon following behind
1:09:45the other, the image wouldn't have
1:09:47worked. They had to catch that same
1:09:48photon. You know, humans are incredible.
1:09:52[laughter]
1:09:52>> Some of us
1:09:54>> Oh, hey,
1:09:55>> some of them, I should say.
1:09:56>> Maybe maybe pretty much all of us in
1:09:58different ways. Yeah, I mean, you know,
1:09:59I
1:10:00>> unrealized potential.
1:10:01>> No, I I got to go back to this. I mean,
1:10:02I mean, one of my good I I have three
1:10:04friends now have won the Nobel Prize,
1:10:06which is always like, you know, what the
1:10:07hell am I doing?
1:10:07>> That's awesome.
1:10:08>> Um, but group Yeah,
1:10:10>> but you have good group chats.
1:10:11>> Well, see, the funny thing is we we
1:10:13certainly don't all get together and
1:10:14talk theoretical physics. I mean, that's
1:10:15not really what we do. But I was seated
1:10:17next to one of them at a meal one time
1:10:18and somebody came by and said, "Oh, look
1:10:20at all the brain power here." And I I
1:10:22actually in this I try to be kind of
1:10:24nice about it, but I said, you know,
1:10:26there's a single mother working three
1:10:27jobs part-time, you know, who's waiting
1:10:29tables over there. And I mean, the the
1:10:31mental capacity and the strength of that
1:10:34person is something that,
1:10:36>> you know, I mean, don't look at us. Go
1:10:38go go go go praise that person.
1:10:39>> Well, that's brain power, too. It's just
1:10:41a different thing.
1:10:42>> It's survival. I mean, it's trying to
1:10:43keep your life and and soul together.
1:10:45the the the privilege of being able to
1:10:47work at NASA and and to be able to work
1:10:50with a team like that and do things you
1:10:52think are impossible,
1:10:54you know, that that was kind of a part
1:10:56of my life you could stick a pen in and
1:10:58say that meant something. You know, that
1:10:59that that gave me some meaning. That
1:11:01that gave me joy.
1:11:03And as you said, it's not so much being
1:11:06a hunter gatherer. It it's it's it's,
1:11:08you know, can we ask a question that we
1:11:10think is impossible and can we just go
1:11:11and do it? Yeah.
1:11:13>> Yeah. the ultimate expression of human
1:11:15curiosity when you say that we don't
1:11:17have the physics when when you're trying
1:11:20to understand what's happening in a
1:11:22neutron star. What do you mean?
1:11:23>> So you can measure how big these things
1:11:25are and you can measure how massive they
1:11:27are and so then you can do a calculation
1:11:29as to what the density inside would be.
1:11:32And you know it I mean to put it I mean
1:11:34probably the interior core is denser
1:11:36than the outer regions but if you had a
1:11:38teaspoon of this material it would have
1:11:40about as much mass as Mount Everest.
1:11:43And um the reason they're called neutron
1:11:45stars is that the gravity is so intense
1:11:48on these things. I mean this I mean I I
1:11:51hate I hate sort of a simple view of
1:11:53atoms as little balls going around each
1:11:54other because they're not they're
1:11:55they're waves of energy, but the gravity
1:11:58actually crushes the electrons into the
1:12:00nucleus. They combine with protons to
1:12:01become neutrons. So they're they're
1:12:03mainly little balls of neutrons. But we
1:12:06we do There you go. Uh you see the big
1:12:08question mark there at the core. So So
1:12:11here's the problem. you you you you you
1:12:13run our our basic laws of physics, our
1:12:15understanding of how particles work and
1:12:17you get to the density of a neutron core
1:12:19and and the equations don't work.
1:12:21They're not making the right
1:12:22predictions. We can tell that there is
1:12:25um there's actually a really great NASA
1:12:27video I I would I would I would suggest
1:12:29you watch it. It's called um the the
1:12:31interior of a neutron star. uh well I
1:12:34can help you find it but it it basically
1:12:36says that that the
1:12:37>> the models we have about how matter
1:12:40works at that sort of density none of
1:12:42them give the right predictions for the
1:12:43the size of the neutron star.
1:12:45>> Why is that?
1:12:46>> We don't have the right physics for it
1:12:48yet.
1:12:48>> So so you know we run our physics and we
1:12:50say if you have this much volume and
1:12:52this much mass what should that interior
1:12:54be like? And and none of our current
1:12:57models of how matter works gives us the
1:12:59right observations gives us the right
1:13:00size.
1:13:01>> So what are we missing? Well, um, for
1:13:04one thing, you know, what you're
1:13:06probably looking at inside a neutron
1:13:08star is some type of interaction of
1:13:10quarks, the actual the actual sort of
1:13:11building blocks of neutrons and protons,
1:13:13the particles that make up protons and
1:13:15neutrons.
1:13:16>> Oo, that's cool.
1:13:16>> Yeah. There. Oh, you got it. You got it.
1:13:18You're amazing. I I I have to say I'm
1:13:20seriously impressed by this person's uh
1:13:22ability. Yeah. So, I mean, this is a
1:13:25video that it was done by uh by NASA,
1:13:27Testing Matters Limits. It's a 4-minute
1:13:29video and and while I don't think it's
1:13:31an absolutely perfect video, I'm I think
1:13:33it's fantastic. And so you see the uh
1:13:36this is supposed to represent the
1:13:37electrons being pulled into the the
1:13:39nucleus and making neutrons. And then at
1:13:42the very heart of these things, we're in
1:13:44a state of matter that we have no
1:13:46description for yet. We we we can't tell
1:13:48you how it behaves. We we've never
1:13:50created it in a lab. We we you we don't
1:13:53know how this type of matter acts. It's
1:13:55a new state of matter. We we don't know
1:13:57what it's like.
1:13:58>> Wow.
1:13:58>> And uh you know it's it's made when when
1:14:01one of these giant stars explodes you
1:14:03know the the core of the star becomes
1:14:05compressed. And then this this will take
1:14:07you through us trying to figure out what
1:14:09you know whether you know you have
1:14:10particles as discrete particles as
1:14:12neutrons and protons or whether there's
1:14:14some type of quark soup inside. But but
1:14:17pretty much every model so far doesn't
1:14:20match what we actually measure from
1:14:23these things. We we we cannot describe
1:14:25them yet. We we need better physics.
1:14:27>> Are there any other structures that are
1:14:29similar in our lack of understanding of
1:14:31them in the universe?
1:14:32>> Well, we got you got two big ones right
1:14:33in front of you. Neutron stars and black
1:14:35holes, right? So, so I mean these the
1:14:37black holes as well. You know, what is
1:14:39inside a black hole? Is there an inside
1:14:42if space and time don't really exist? Um
1:14:45you know, and then and then much more
1:14:47easy to see are these neutron stars. The
1:14:50the people who study neutron stars at
1:14:51NASA, they had this wonderful
1:14:52expression. They're like, "With a black
1:14:54hole, you can't see anything. it
1:14:55collapses into an event horizon.
1:14:56Nothing's coming out. With a neutron
1:14:58star, you got the freaking thing right
1:14:59there in front of you. You can actually
1:15:00observe something. And so, you know,
1:15:03they they figured that neutron stars are
1:15:04much more exciting than black holes
1:15:05because you can actually like do
1:15:07experiments, take a picture, build a
1:15:08telescope. And uh but but this
1:15:11experiment was an inexpensive small
1:15:14observatory that that's up on the
1:15:15International Space Station. And I mean
1:15:17I mean it's they're they're doing
1:15:19incredible work about the the nature of
1:15:22physics and and and testing where our
1:15:24limits are. It's it's unbelievable what
1:15:25you can do with even a a relatively
1:15:27inexpensive mission.
1:15:29>> When you look at the size of some black
1:15:32holes, we were talking the other day
1:15:34about the largest black hole where the
1:15:36event horizon goes past Pluto.
1:15:38>> Yeah.
1:15:39>> If it was the the size of our solar
1:15:40system.
1:15:41>> Absolutely. that that's almost
1:15:43impossible to even think about that
1:15:46there's a black hole that's bigger than
1:15:48our solar system. And how did it get
1:15:51that big? [laughter]
1:15:52>> How much time does it take for it to
1:15:55gather up that much matter to get that
1:15:58big?
1:15:58>> Well, you were talking about these
1:15:59little red dots that the web telescope
1:16:01is seeing. So, I mean, what you've just
1:16:02done is put your finger on, I think, one
1:16:05of the most fascinating unanswered
1:16:06questions in astronomy right now. that
1:16:09every major galaxy has a has a big black
1:16:12hole in the center. You know, the the
1:16:13one in the middle of our galaxy is about
1:16:154 million times the mass of the sun and
1:16:18and physically it's not that big. It's
1:16:20it's about let's say around about the
1:16:22orbit of say the inner solar system
1:16:23Mercury kind of around there. But then
1:16:26the bigger ones we know in other
1:16:28galaxies can get up to hundreds you know
1:16:30I mean let's say you know tens of
1:16:32billions of times the mass of the sun
1:16:34and and those the event horizons about
1:16:36the size of the orbit of Pluto.
1:16:39The the question is how do you gather 10
1:16:42billion times the mass of a star
1:16:44together in the beginning? You know we
1:16:47black holes the only thing we know that
1:16:49forms big black holes like that. So a
1:16:51star collapses a star dies and this you
1:16:54know this tremendous crush of gravity as
1:16:56the star collapses creates this
1:16:58bottomless pit of gravity called a black
1:17:00hole. So how do you get that many stars
1:17:03to die? How do you I mean in the early
1:17:05universe, how many stars what how many
1:17:06generations of stars had had to burn
1:17:09through to actually get that to happen?
1:17:11And there was nothing that we could
1:17:13figure out. I mean I mean how do you
1:17:14make that big of a black hole? So these
1:17:16these little red dots that we're seeing
1:17:18with with with web and and when we don't
1:17:21know exactly what these are, but but but
1:17:24right now the observations are pushing
1:17:25us in a very interesting direction.
1:17:28They're they're about a million times
1:17:30the mass of the sun. And at first we
1:17:34thought, okay, well, are these whole
1:17:35galaxies? And and that was the the
1:17:36controversy you alluded to that that how
1:17:38how could there be galaxies that far
1:17:40back in time? We're we're looking back
1:17:42to a time about 400 million years after
1:17:45the Big Bang. We're looking so far away.
1:17:47The light took that long to travel to
1:17:48us.
1:17:50So we we we saw these these these sort
1:17:52of bright objects. At first we thought
1:17:54they were galaxies, and that was like,
1:17:55whoa, how'd they get there so fast? But
1:17:58then we took a better look at them and
1:17:59they don't actually shine in the same
1:18:01light a galaxy would. They and they
1:18:03appear to have the signature of
1:18:05something inside. Some of them rotating
1:18:07very fast. Very fast.
1:18:10And what we're wondering is if the first
1:18:13generation of stars, the very first
1:18:15stars that existed were nothing at all
1:18:18like the stars we have today. The
1:18:20universe was denser. There was probably
1:18:22more of this stuff called dark matter
1:18:24that had gravity pulling everything
1:18:26together. So maybe at at that time the
1:18:29universe had just there were cores of
1:18:31huge amounts of gas that collapsed
1:18:32together. Instead of forming a star, the
1:18:36core basically collapsed into a black
1:18:37hole immediately and it started pulling
1:18:40in material and all this sort of hot
1:18:41stuff formed what they call a pseudo
1:18:44star. There's all this this this
1:18:46atmosphere of hot gas being heated up by
1:18:48by the black hole in the middle. As as
1:18:50as the gas spirals in towards the black
1:18:51hole, it gets hotter and hotter. So
1:18:53instead of a nuclear fusion core of a
1:18:55star, you have a black hole heating
1:18:57everything up on the inside,
1:18:59accumulating all this mass. And are we
1:19:02looking at for the first time the seeds
1:19:05of these giant black holes
1:19:07that instead of there being you know the
1:19:10first thing was stars the way we think
1:19:12of stars was the first thing huge
1:19:15amounts of gas and dust collapsing into
1:19:17black holes and heating up sort of a you
1:19:20know a pseudo star around it millions of
1:19:22times the mass of the sun and then in a
1:19:25dense area like the heart of a galaxy
1:19:27these things then start to combine over
1:19:29time gravity pulls them together and you
1:19:31build bigger and bigger black holes.
1:19:34So once again, we don't know yet that
1:19:37these are what what's that's what go
1:19:39that these objects are. But at the
1:19:40moment, it's one of the best
1:19:41explanations we have and it fits the
1:19:44data quite well. So you know, we will
1:19:47keep observing these things. We will
1:19:48keep finding new ones. Uh one of the big
1:19:51questions has been why don't they give
1:19:52off more X-rays? Because if there's
1:19:54matter streaming down a black hole, it
1:19:56should give off very high radiation like
1:19:58X-rays. And then just in the last couple
1:20:00of months, there are some uh some
1:20:01observations coming out where we're
1:20:03finding some of these are indeed X-ray
1:20:04sources.
1:20:06So, we may have found the answer to
1:20:09where you get these big black holes.
1:20:11>> And and that was one of the the big
1:20:14hopes for the James Webb Space Telescope
1:20:16that it would help us answer the
1:20:18question of where do you get these giant
1:20:20black holes in the cores of galaxies?
1:20:22Where do they come from? There shouldn't
1:20:24have been enough time for that many
1:20:25stars to make them.
1:20:28>> [sighs]
1:20:28>> I watched a documentary around black
1:20:30holes once where they were talking about
1:20:31that in the center of every galaxy
1:20:33there's a super massive black hole
1:20:34that's 1/ half of 1% of the mass of the
1:20:37entire galaxy.
1:20:38>> It seems to be correlated. Yeah. The
1:20:39bigger the galaxy, the bigger the black
1:20:40hole. Yeah.
1:20:40>> Which is nuts. And the what they were
1:20:43theorizing was that if you went through
1:20:48that black hole, you could potentially
1:20:50be in a completely different universe
1:20:52filled with galaxies all that have black
1:20:54holes inside of them. through that
1:20:56another universe that you would have an
1:20:59infinite number of universes that exist
1:21:02and all there's these like black holes
1:21:04and if you can go through them all of
1:21:06them and it broke my brain cuz I'm just
1:21:09sitting there I'm thinking like wait a
1:21:10minute how many billions of galaxies are
1:21:12there?
1:21:13>> Yeah.
1:21:13>> Like what and each one of them has a
1:21:15black hole in the center of it?
1:21:16>> Yeah. Well, and and I mean we don't know
1:21:19yet how many uh I mean there there are
1:21:22these giant black holes in the middle of
1:21:23galaxies and then there are smaller
1:21:24black holes caused when massive stars
1:21:26dies and you our galaxy probably has
1:21:28millions of those. But the uh the ones
1:21:31in the in the in the center of the
1:21:32galaxies are fascinating. The um the one
1:21:34in our galaxy so we're about about
1:21:3725,000 lighty years away from the sky so
1:21:39we're safe. But um
1:21:42we actually observed stars that are
1:21:44trapped around the black hole that are
1:21:46orbiting the black hole. This was the
1:21:47first way we found the location of the
1:21:49black hole. Stars were orbiting kind of
1:21:51like this angry swarm of bees almost in
1:21:53every direction. And they were orbiting
1:21:55around something you didn't see. And the
1:21:57mass needed to make all these stars
1:21:59orbit was about four million times the
1:22:00mass of the sun. There was a star called
1:22:03S2 we observed orbiting close to the
1:22:05black hole, kind of like a comet. It
1:22:07would come in and whip around the black
1:22:08hole, then go back out again. and an S2
1:22:10at closest approach when it whips around
1:22:12the black hole. This is a star goes
1:22:15nearly 20 million miles an hour as it
1:22:18whips around the black hole. And then
1:22:20just recently we found another star that
1:22:22actually gets up to over 50 million
1:22:24miles an hour as the black hole whips it
1:22:27around. And this is how we test the idea
1:22:29that time is different around a black
1:22:30hole. We actually see these stars
1:22:32whipping so close to a black hole. We
1:22:34can tell that there are changes in their
1:22:36orbit, that they're actually going
1:22:37through different time.
1:22:39And uh um and so we see these stars
1:22:41whipping around the black hole at the
1:22:43middle of our galaxy. They will probably
1:22:44eventually go down that black hole. I
1:22:46mean, maybe everything in our galaxy
1:22:48will eventually kind of spiral down into
1:22:50that black hole. But you know, we we
1:22:53this is this is not conjectural. These
1:22:56are observations from telescopes. You
1:22:59know, look up S2. Look up I don't know
1:23:01what the name of the one that it goes
1:23:02faster. It's a telephone telephone
1:23:04number, but that's real.
1:23:08Now, the question about what happens if
1:23:10you could survive going into a black
1:23:12hole, and this is another place where we
1:23:14need better physics. Quite honestly, our
1:23:15physics gives up.
1:23:18There are all kinds of wonderful,
1:23:21fascinating possibilities. I mean,
1:23:23people have pointed out this is not
1:23:25observation. Now, we're going from
1:23:27observation, we see these things,
1:23:28they're real to conjecture. People have
1:23:32said that if you take the entire
1:23:33universe, the the the entire mass of the
1:23:36universe and the radius that the
1:23:38diameter of the observable universe
1:23:40almost exactly matches a black hole. You
1:23:43know, you could it be that, you know,
1:23:45inside a black hole, a new universe
1:23:47forms when a black hole forms. Is that
1:23:49what the big bang was? Was the big bang
1:23:51a black hole forming in another universe
1:23:53and popping off our own universe? Are
1:23:56black holes somehow connected to other
1:23:57universes? These are all incredible
1:24:00questions. We we don't yet have the
1:24:02physics to answer them. But you know,
1:24:05people have said, you know, why is it
1:24:07the universe has about the same density
1:24:09of a black hole, the same size and mass?
1:24:12Is that just a coincidence or are we
1:24:14looking at something deeper?
1:24:15>> Or is it fractal? Is it the entire
1:24:17universe exists inside of a black hole?
1:24:19>> Yes, exactly.
1:24:20>> That's bananas.
1:24:21>> Yeah. There there we have the the very
1:24:24large array that was at the uh that was
1:24:26in Chile. That's a wonderful
1:24:27observatory. There we have a a great uh
1:24:30depiction. Oh, he he you found Okay.
1:24:32Yeah, I've never seen a depiction like
1:24:35that's the stars moving around a black
1:24:36hole.
1:24:36>> Yeah, the stars moving around a black
1:24:37hole.
1:24:38>> What's coming? What would this ejection
1:24:40be?
1:24:40>> Um so that Okay. What what that is is
1:24:42that that's a consequence of the black
1:24:44holes. Um that doesn't come from inside
1:24:46the black hole. All of that swirling gas
1:24:48gets really fast. We actually observe
1:24:50some of the swirling gas going close to
1:24:52the speed of light. Black holes, you
1:24:54know, they're they're going down the
1:24:55drain. They're going faster and faster
1:24:56as you get closer to the black hole. And
1:24:58um all of that very very hot gas
1:25:00generates a very strong magnetic field.
1:25:03And so what you're looking at with those
1:25:04jets is that that's just the magnetic
1:25:06field of the hot gas going around the
1:25:08black hole. Some of that hot gas gets
1:25:10directed into jets by the magnetic
1:25:12field. There's nothing coming out of the
1:25:13black hole. Nothing that we know of
1:25:15comes out of a black hole. But black
1:25:17holes are incredibly This is This is
1:25:19wonderfully ironic. They're incredibly
1:25:21bright because if there's gas trying to
1:25:23get around a spinning around a black
1:25:24hole, the gravity accelerates that gas
1:25:27so fast it spins it up to in some cases
1:25:29millions or billions of degrees. You can
1:25:31see them clear across the observable
1:25:33universe. They're the brightest objects
1:25:34in the sky. And this this is not light
1:25:37coming from inside the black hole. It's
1:25:38light coming from stuff trapped around
1:25:40the black hole as it spirals in. And
1:25:43these huge jets, we we see some of these
1:25:45jets going, you know, in some cases more
1:25:47than 100,000 lightyears. I mean they're
1:25:49they're huge jets that come out
1:25:51>> 100,000 lighty years and one light years
1:25:53is how many trillion miles?
1:25:54>> Six trillion miles about [laughter]
1:25:57>> Yeah. Yeah. So
1:25:58>> Oh my god.
1:25:59>> And then in the uh
1:26:00>> Oh my god.
1:26:01>> Yeah. So I mean around uh um around
1:26:04>> that video is so nuts.
1:26:06>> I've never seen that.
1:26:07>> Yeah.
1:26:07>> When I was looking for this or stumbled
1:26:09across this I saw a theoretical thing
1:26:11called a white hole
1:26:12>> which is potentially maybe on the other
1:26:14side of a black hole.
1:26:15>> You know the the
1:26:17>> Yeah. No, no, no. It's it's an idea. I
1:26:18mean, that idea, honestly, it had a lot
1:26:21more um uh following, you know, more in
1:26:23the in like the 60s and 70s. It's kind
1:26:25of fallen out of favor because at first
1:26:27we thought that the these hugely bright
1:26:29objects were were white holes at the end
1:26:30of a black hole. Maybe the radiation
1:26:32went through a tunnel through space and
1:26:34came out somewhere. But now we know that
1:26:36these super bright objects are actually
1:26:38hot gas discs around black holes. And
1:26:40they are bright. Like I said, they're
1:26:42the brightest things we know of in the
1:26:43sky. and uh you know so that's that's
1:26:46something you can see you know literally
1:26:48billions of light years away is the hot
1:26:50gas going around a black hole.
1:26:51>> You said another thing that broke my
1:26:53brain. Um you were talking about
1:26:57what the big bang is and that we
1:27:00shouldn't think of the big bang as an
1:27:02explosion
1:27:04but that before the big bang time and
1:27:08space might not have existed.
1:27:11>> Well pretty much certainly not in the
1:27:13way we experience them. No, I mean I
1:27:15mean once again, you know, no astronomer
1:27:18thinks the big bang came from nothing.
1:27:21The problem is once again we have no
1:27:24description of what that state of matter
1:27:26would be. None.
1:27:28I mean the idea that everything we
1:27:30observe of in the universe could have
1:27:31once been at a subatomic scale.
1:27:34You'll notice I'm very careful about
1:27:36this. I talk about the observable
1:27:37universe. We have no idea how big the
1:27:40universe is. We don't know whether it's
1:27:41infinite or whether it has an end. But
1:27:43there's been only a certain amount of
1:27:45time that light has had to travel to us.
1:27:47That's not the whole universe. That
1:27:49that's centered on us. That's an effect.
1:27:51If we look in every direction in the
1:27:52sky, we can only look back as far as
1:27:55there's been time for light to actually
1:27:57travel to us. And you see some
1:27:59incredible things. I mean, one of the
1:28:01things that uh one of my friends has the
1:28:02Nobel Prize for is if you look so far
1:28:05away, the farthest away we can see now,
1:28:08we're looking back to a time about
1:28:10400,000 years after the Big Bang. And
1:28:12this is something where we are actually
1:28:15able to see so far away. We're looking
1:28:17back to a time when the whole universe
1:28:19was hot and bright. It actually was
1:28:22glowing like the surface of the sun. The
1:28:23whole universe. The entire universe was
1:28:26so bright. It was like looking at the
1:28:28surface of the sun. And and this is is
1:28:31has now this radiation has traveled a
1:28:34long time to get to us. It's now lost
1:28:36energy because it's traveling through
1:28:38the expanding universe. And as the
1:28:40universe expands, the the wave the
1:28:42wavelength of light gets stretched out
1:28:44by the expansion of space. This is what
1:28:46we call the microwave background
1:28:48radiation.
1:28:49So there there's there's a there's a
1:28:51microwave very low energy signal. It
1:28:53comes from every direction on the sky.
1:28:55And it's coming from a time it's coming
1:28:57from a distance so far away that the
1:29:00whole universe was as bright as the
1:29:02surface of the sun. And and that's as
1:29:05far as we can see because any farther
1:29:08away from that the universe is opaque
1:29:11literally in every direction on the sky
1:29:13you eventually look back to a time when
1:29:15the whole universe was so dense and
1:29:17bright you can't see any farther.
1:29:19>> Is this because of how we're capable of
1:29:22measuring? And is it possible that at
1:29:24one point in time when we get better and
1:29:26better telescopes that we can look past
1:29:29that?
1:29:30>> Well, not with light. See, see the
1:29:31universe actually does become opaque to
1:29:33light at that point
1:29:34>> because it's too long ago.
1:29:36>> It's it's it's basically the universe is
1:29:38so bright itself. Yeah. I mean, so you
1:29:41know, you look in any direction on the
1:29:43sky, you look back to a time, you know,
1:29:45we the wonderful thing about the
1:29:47universe changing is we know this is
1:29:48true. The farther out we look with a
1:29:50telescope, the farther light has had to
1:29:52travel, the the more time it takes to
1:29:54get to us. So the sun we see the light
1:29:57takes about eight minutes to get from us
1:29:58to the sun. the nearest star about four
1:30:00years. The nearest galaxy to us about
1:30:02two million years. We can see so far
1:30:05away in space that the light took pretty
1:30:07much the age of the universe to get to
1:30:09us about 400,000 years after the big
1:30:11bang. At that point, the universe
1:30:13becomes opaque to light.
1:30:16So there is a limit to how much we can
1:30:18observe with light, how much time there
1:30:21has been for for light to actually get
1:30:23to us.
1:30:24>> Is there a potential for being able to
1:30:25observe with something other than light?
1:30:28Absolutely. So your question is a really
1:30:32profound one. We don't know how big the
1:30:34universe is. When we talk about the
1:30:36universe, we mainly talk about the
1:30:38observable universe, everything we're
1:30:39able to see. So the question you just
1:30:42asked, can you see farther back, even if
1:30:44it's opaque to light? Yes. And and this
1:30:48is something that again we talk about
1:30:50moments in your life where the universe
1:30:51changed, where you thought people people
1:30:54did something you thought was
1:30:55impossible. And um I mean going all the
1:30:58way back to the mid 90s I was a posttock
1:31:00at Caltech and um I wasn't working with
1:31:03this department but people were starting
1:31:05to measure something called
1:31:06gravitational waves
1:31:08and gravitational waves again I I never
1:31:12thought they'd be able to actually
1:31:13detect these. The the universe is is
1:31:16constantly I mean I mean every time we
1:31:18move remember how I said time is
1:31:20different from the top of your head to
1:31:21the bottom of your feet. You know, as I
1:31:23move, I create gravity. You know,
1:31:26gravity actually is it goes out as a
1:31:28wave into the universe at the speed of
1:31:29light. Can you detect a wave of gravity?
1:31:33Well, a gravity is actually a curvature
1:31:36of space and time itself. So, you're
1:31:38you're trying to say, could we detect a
1:31:41wave that's actually made of space and
1:31:42time? And this project is called LIGO.
1:31:46And LIGO stands um LIGO stands for the
1:31:49Laser Interferometric Gravitational Wave
1:31:51Observatory. And it started out with
1:31:53with two facilities, one in Oregon and
1:31:55one in Louisiana. And LIGO has two
1:31:58extremely long lasers at at a corner
1:32:00that at a right angle. The lasers I I
1:32:03believe are 4 kilometers on a side.
1:32:06They're huge, right? A 4 km laser. They
1:32:09want them to be as as perfectly the same
1:32:11length as they can. And then there's a
1:32:13laser beam that bounces back and forth.
1:32:16And and as the laser beam bounces back
1:32:18and forth, if it's exactly the same
1:32:20length, they the signal kind of cancels
1:32:22out.
1:32:23But what happens if there's actually a
1:32:26wave of space and time coming by? Space
1:32:29itself compresses. Time changes. All of
1:32:32a sudden, these two these two lasers are
1:32:35no longer exactly the same length. Space
1:32:37itself has changed as as a wave comes
1:32:39by.
1:32:41tiny amounts. These gravitational waves
1:32:43are thousands of times smaller than the
1:32:45nucleus of an atom.
1:32:47>> Incredible, right? How would you detect
1:32:49that? And they're traveling at the speed
1:32:50of light.
1:32:52So, you have these 4 kilometer lasers,
1:32:56a wave of space and time comes by and
1:32:58compresses space and time in one
1:33:00direction more than the other. All of a
1:33:01sudden, the lasers are no longer the
1:33:03same length. You get a signal. The the
1:33:06noise for this, right? I mean, I mean,
1:33:08every time Yeah. So, this is us
1:33:10detecting an exploding star this way.
1:33:11I'm happy to talk about that, too. But,
1:33:13but I mean, just the fact they did this,
1:33:16the these lasers are under vacuums.
1:33:18They're in vacuum chambers. I mean, they
1:33:20try every time the UPS truck goes by,
1:33:22they must go haywire. Somebody sneezes.
1:33:24They're measuring things thousands of
1:33:25times smaller than the nucleus of an
1:33:27atom.
1:33:29But over time they got this so accurate.
1:33:31They did it so well that what what
1:33:34happened and I I you can look up the the
1:33:36year but it was um something on the
1:33:37order of about 10 years ago
1:33:40a long ways away millions of light years
1:33:42away um two black holes spiraled
1:33:45together and actually collided to form a
1:33:47big black hole. That was a lot of
1:33:50gravitational energy and that created a
1:33:52ripple going out into the universe. And
1:33:55so you know there's all of the detectors
1:33:57have all this noise in them. The
1:33:58detectors are detecting all kinds of
1:33:59spurious signals. But then all of a
1:34:01sudden in Louisiana, there was this the
1:34:04whole detector went w boom. And then at
1:34:07the speed of light, the detector in
1:34:09Louisiana did exactly the same thing. B
1:34:12the exact same waves at the speed of
1:34:14light difference. And we realized, oh my
1:34:16god, they did it. These tiny waves,
1:34:20we shouldn't even be able to detect
1:34:22them. They found them. And and now it's
1:34:25a it's a routine thing. They've now done
1:34:26this many, many times.
1:34:29Waves in space and time itself might be
1:34:32the way we can see even farther back
1:34:34into the universe. Even when the
1:34:36universe becomes opaque to light, the
1:34:39waves of space and time can come
1:34:40through. Gravitational waves can come
1:34:42through that. And if we can somehow
1:34:45figure out how to make these detectors
1:34:46better and better, you know, could we
1:34:48detect the gravitational waves of the
1:34:50Big Bang? You know, can we learn
1:34:53something about that moment by the way
1:34:56it actually bent space and time and
1:34:57created waves of gravity? And once
1:35:00again, I mean, just a step back a sec.
1:35:01The detecting waves of space and time
1:35:04traveling at the speed of light is
1:35:06something we do.
1:35:09We've done this. It got the Nobel Prize,
1:35:11deserved it. Um, there were there were
1:35:14hundreds of people on that first paper.
1:35:16Some of them were friends of mine. Um,
1:35:19again, they they did it, you
1:35:21know. [laughter] I I I I I just I I
1:35:23cannot I mean I I I I felt my heart just
1:35:26drop that day. I mean out of out of joy.
1:35:28I just it's it's like holy you know
1:35:30they did it. Um that may give us the
1:35:34potential to understand the big bang
1:35:35better as we get better with that. Um
1:35:38you know maybe we can I mean right now
1:35:39we see black holes colliding. We
1:35:41actually see neutron stars colliding.
1:35:43Even stars orbiting each other maybe
1:35:45maybe produces sort of a background of
1:35:47all these waves. But maybe we'll be able
1:35:49to figure out how to see those waves
1:35:50from the moment the universe began.
1:35:53>> How are we sure that of the timeline of
1:35:5713.8 billion years or whatever it is?
1:36:00>> Well, you know, I mean, the these things
1:36:02are never sure, you know, absolutely.
1:36:04But but but there there there's some
1:36:06very good reasons to think it's it's
1:36:07about that. So, you know, you you sort
1:36:10of run physics backwards. You know, you
1:36:12basically say, you know, this is how the
1:36:14universe is expanding now. And Lind,
1:36:16let's let's roughly say that, you know,
1:36:18things, you know, came together. And as
1:36:20I mentioned, you mentioned the podcast,
1:36:22the Big Bang did not have a center. The
1:36:24galaxies are not flying off into space
1:36:25like an explosion. You what what
1:36:27happened is the galaxies are all kind of
1:36:29sort of standing where they are, but
1:36:31space itself is expanding in every
1:36:33direction between the galaxies. It was
1:36:35it's a hard thing. I mean, I this it's a
1:36:38huge misconception about the Big Bang
1:36:40that the Big Bang was this explosion and
1:36:43galaxies are flying into empty space.
1:36:45The the expansion of space is space
1:36:47itself. There's no space out there that
1:36:50galaxies are flying into. That's not how
1:36:51it works,
1:36:52>> right?
1:36:53>> You know, when I
1:36:54>> That's a weird thought right there.
1:36:56They're not flying into space, they are
1:36:58space. When when I when I used to teach
1:37:00this, you know, I used to I used to take
1:37:02a a board and I used to have a piece of
1:37:04elastic and I would I would hammer two
1:37:06nails in on either side of the board and
1:37:08then I would say, "Okay, the these two
1:37:09nails are galaxies and the elastic
1:37:12between them represents our universe."
1:37:14In this case, a two-dimensional
1:37:15depiction of our universe. All of space
1:37:18and time anywhere light can travel is on
1:37:20just on that elastic. Don't think about
1:37:22up or down. There's no space or time
1:37:23there. Everything our universe is is
1:37:25just this piece of elastic, you you
1:37:27know, and then I would take the elastic
1:37:28and I would stretch it and I would say
1:37:30by by by you know, the two galaxies
1:37:32aren't moving. They're they're kind of
1:37:34sitting there. It's the space in between
1:37:36that has now stretched, has now changed.
1:37:40And that's a more realistic idea. The
1:37:42galaxies are not flying through space.
1:37:44It's the space itself that is getting
1:37:47bigger in every direction at once. And
1:37:49that's why there's no center. There's no
1:37:50empty center to the universe. The
1:37:52universe, as far as we can map it, has
1:37:54galaxies everywhere. you know there's no
1:37:57center to it. The expansion is happening
1:37:59in every direction at once because the
1:38:01the the elastic of space and time itself
1:38:04in every direction is just getting
1:38:06bigger. We don't know why.
1:38:08>> So if we are looking at something where
1:38:14the big bang created space and time and
1:38:17as space and time is expanding what was
1:38:21the environment
1:38:23before the big bang?
1:38:24>> Yeah. And that's the problem. So you
1:38:26mean I mean we have no description of
1:38:28that. You know there there there are
1:38:31particle accelerators. I've had the the
1:38:34wonderful chance to go to us to go to
1:38:36CERN a couple of times and go to the
1:38:37Large Hadron Collider and you know you
1:38:40know using you know incredible
1:38:43accelerating magnets. You know they they
1:38:45whip you know just single protons up to
1:38:47very very high temperatures.
1:38:50I mean, they're they're trying to
1:38:51recreate conditions where, you know, I
1:38:54mean, they can't recreate the conditions
1:38:56of what things were like before the Big
1:38:57Bang, but, you know, can you get matter
1:38:59to such a high energy state that it can
1:39:02recreate what things were like, you
1:39:03know, a millionth of a second after the
1:39:04Big Bang, you know, or maybe even
1:39:06further back? And, you know, but the
1:39:10idea of what was that state of matter
1:39:12before that that expansion, we have no
1:39:15description of yet. I think we will
1:39:16someday. I don't think it's impossible.
1:39:19But there there's nothing about our
1:39:21current physics. I mean, it would be
1:39:23like taking somebody from the 1400s and
1:39:26saying, you know, describe to me what
1:39:28the interior of the sun is like. They
1:39:29they would have we they would have no
1:39:31knowledge structure to even attempt it.
1:39:35That doesn't mean we didn't figure it
1:39:36out eventually. And you know, so like I
1:39:39said, there's nothing about that I think
1:39:41that's completely off limits. But we'll
1:39:42have to understand space and time very
1:39:44differently.
1:39:46And we'll have to understand what you
1:39:48know, you can't even really call it
1:39:49matter or even energy.
1:39:53All of the energy of the universe in a
1:39:54subatomic space, we have no idea what
1:39:57that would behave like,
1:39:59>> you know,
1:40:00>> and what is it existing in?
1:40:02>> Yeah. Well,
1:40:02>> that's that's the what I'm asking is
1:40:04like the environment
1:40:06>> that preceded the big bang. Like what
1:40:08are we talking about where this
1:40:10subatomic thing that contains everything
1:40:13that's in the known universe? What is
1:40:15it? How is it existing?
1:40:19>> And and of course of course I have no
1:40:21answer to it. I mean I mean you're
1:40:22asking the question that I hope someday
1:40:25humanity will have a chance to explore
1:40:27and we'll know more about then I think
1:40:30what will happen is that once we can
1:40:31describe what happened before the big
1:40:33bang there there'll be a whole series of
1:40:34other questions.
1:40:35>> So if it's if the big bang is the wrong
1:40:37way to think about it of a a bang what's
1:40:40the right way to think about it? Yeah,
1:40:42>> the initial expansion.
1:40:45>> I can't think of necessarily a better
1:40:46term. I mean, you you know, the big bang
1:40:48was meant as actually a a criticism,
1:40:50right? It was it was Fred Hy um when
1:40:52people first began back in the 1920s
1:40:55when they discovered the universe was
1:40:57expanding. And this was a big surprise.
1:40:59I mean, famously, Albert Einstein, you
1:41:01didn't think that it was. And then he
1:41:03saw that the evidence all of a sudden
1:41:05with our telescopes, we saw the universe
1:41:06is expanding in every direction. you
1:41:08know, uh, it was actually Fred Hoy that,
1:41:11uh, you know, said at a conference as a
1:41:14way of making fun of this. You know,
1:41:15people were saying, well, maybe
1:41:16everything went back to sort of a common
1:41:18denser, you know, structure. It was
1:41:21actually a uh, it was a Belgian Jesuit
1:41:23uh, um, um, father, a Belgian priest
1:41:26named George Lmetra who came up with
1:41:28this the idea that if the universe was
1:41:29expanding now, if we run time backwards,
1:41:32maybe it all becomes one big, he called
1:41:33it the the the primordial atom. That was
1:41:37uh George Lmetra and uh said
1:41:40>> what year was this?
1:41:41>> Um George Lamemetra. So we would have
1:41:43been talking around about probably
1:41:45sometime in the 1920s. I bet we could
1:41:47probably have some help.
1:41:48>> So a hundred years ago.
1:41:50>> Yeah. 100 years ago. So George Lmetra
1:41:52says if we run time backwards, we we we
1:41:54get this big lump of something,
1:41:56the primordial atom.
1:41:59And then Fred Hoy said, "What you mean
1:42:01the whole universe started with a big
1:42:02bang? you know, really there was this
1:42:04big there was this atom that went bang.
1:42:06So, so, so even the the term the big
1:42:08bang was meant as a criticism. It was
1:42:10meant to be funny.
1:42:11>> It wasn't something that scientists came
1:42:13up with as the best description.
1:42:15>> But what happened then is everybody kind
1:42:16of nodded and said, "Well, yeah, you
1:42:18know, and uh I mean more people should
1:42:22know about George Lmetra, you know, the
1:42:23the Jesuit Belgian uh scientist that
1:42:25that came up with that idea. I think he
1:42:27was a fascinating man. Interestingly
1:42:29enough, even as a Jesuit, um [snorts] he
1:42:32he did not think that this necessarily
1:42:33was a biblical Genesis story. I mean, he
1:42:36was he was approaching this as a
1:42:37scientist. You know, what's the best
1:42:40thing we can say to describe these
1:42:41different times and states of the
1:42:43universe? You know, a lot of my friends
1:42:45are u the the the Catholic Church, the
1:42:47Jesuits have had, you know, an active
1:42:49astronomy program for for a thousand
1:42:50years. And so, uh you know, the Vatican
1:42:52Observatory still has an excellent
1:42:54program. So, but the question you're
1:42:57asking about what came before the big
1:42:59bang. I mean I mean again what happens
1:43:01inside a black hole
1:43:04it it's wonderful that there are these
1:43:06things right over the horizon for from
1:43:08us. We we we know the universe is
1:43:10expanding. What was it like before? What
1:43:12a what a great [snorts] simple elegant
1:43:14question. We have no idea yet.
1:43:17>> Why do we think that it was so small?
1:43:22>> There's some interesting evidence about
1:43:23that. And once again,
1:43:26it's not so much that the entire
1:43:28universe was small. There's compelling
1:43:30evidence that everything we can see was
1:43:33once in a very small volume. Let me let
1:43:35me just sort of say that we're limited
1:43:38by this time factor. You look out as far
1:43:40as you can and eventually you get to the
1:43:43time of the Big Bang. You can't see any
1:43:44further. The universe to us is only as
1:43:47big as light has had time to travel to
1:43:49us. That's not the whole universe. If
1:43:51you're on a galaxy millions of billions
1:43:54of light years away from us, that galaxy
1:43:56sees its own observable universe, you
1:43:58know, I mean, we we basically see in a
1:44:00sphere around us how far we're able to
1:44:02see given the time. A galaxy that we can
1:44:05observe with web the web telescope has
1:44:08its own sphere around it. It's seeing
1:44:09into the universe farther than we can
1:44:11see in some directions.
1:44:14So, but we know the universe isn't just
1:44:17our observable universe. So, like I
1:44:19said, so I mean we we see we're here. We
1:44:22can see as far back as light has had
1:44:24time to travel to us since the big bang,
1:44:26but then there's another galaxy over
1:44:28here and it has its own view. And then
1:44:30there's another one over here that has
1:44:31its own view.
1:44:32>> Jimmy put something up here.
1:44:34>> Yeah. So yeah, I'm not even sure that I
1:44:36mean that that's a a great NASA uh
1:44:39depiction of where this you see as you
1:44:41move toward the left back to the time of
1:44:43the Big Bang, you get to this kind of
1:44:45beautiful kind of rainbow colored area
1:44:47and that's where what they call the the
1:44:48afterglow. That that's the that's the
1:44:50the microwave background radiation about
1:44:53400,000 years after the Big Bang. That's
1:44:55as far as we can see. The universe after
1:44:57that becomes opaque.
1:45:00So that's as far as our observable
1:45:02universe can take us. We know that's not
1:45:04the whole universe. So the whole
1:45:07universe could have been huge before the
1:45:09big bang. It could have been infinite.
1:45:11We don't know how big it was. All we
1:45:13know is our little bit of it. You I mean
1:45:15for the sake of argument, let's say I'm
1:45:16I'm the entire meta universe. You know,
1:45:20there was a little atom of me that
1:45:21expanded to become the known universe we
1:45:24know. But that doesn't mean that that
1:45:25little atom was the whole universe. The
1:45:27universe could be huge. We don't know.
1:45:30Before the Big Bang, it could have
1:45:31already been infinitely large. We have
1:45:33no idea. The only evidence we have is
1:45:36that the stuff we can see was once in a
1:45:38very close area. And that goes back to
1:45:41that that that radiation, that microwave
1:45:43background. The the microwave background
1:45:46has been a wonderful story. It was uh it
1:45:49was discovered back in the 1970s by um
1:45:52two uh scientists from Bell Labs called
1:45:54Pensas and Wilson. And uh they were
1:45:57trying to categorize they they they were
1:45:59they were dealing with Bell Labs. They
1:46:01were trying to deal with microwave
1:46:02signals, microwave communication. And
1:46:04they built a big microwave telescope and
1:46:06they started to to catalog what objects
1:46:08in the sky naturally produce microwaves.
1:46:11The sun produces some other things
1:46:13produce microwaves. This was all for
1:46:14communications.
1:46:16And they discovered that everywhere they
1:46:18looked in the sky, there was this
1:46:20background noise. Very low level, but it
1:46:22was there. Everywhere they looked, it
1:46:24was the same. didn't matter what
1:46:25direction the telescope was pointing.
1:46:27And so what a good scientist would
1:46:29assume is that that's probably a problem
1:46:30with your telescope. If you have
1:46:32background noise in every direction you
1:46:34look, it's probably in your detector.
1:46:36And the the best guess they had was that
1:46:38it was pigeon
1:46:40[laughter]
1:46:41>> So there you go. Pigeon. Look at that.
1:46:42>> Wow.
1:46:43>> So So Sopenzius and Wilson built this,
1:46:45you know, they they they were working
1:46:46with this big microwave telescope and
1:46:49little did I know that pigeon
1:46:51actually gives off microwaves. It does.
1:46:53They um they trapped all the pigeons in
1:46:55the in the microwave telescope. You
1:46:56could actually see a pigeon trap in the
1:46:58Smithsonian where they they did this.
1:47:00They they scraped out all the pigeon
1:47:01and and lo and behold, the signal
1:47:03was still there in every direction you
1:47:06looked. It was exactly the same.
1:47:08Exactly.
1:47:10And and what they had discovered was the
1:47:12afterglow of the big bang. The energy
1:47:14left over from that time when the
1:47:16universe was so hot it was opaque to
1:47:18light. And the crazy thing is it is
1:47:22exactly the same down to fractions of a
1:47:25degree in every direction on the sky.
1:47:27It's sort of like, you know, you look
1:47:29all the way the age of the universe in
1:47:31one direction. It's exactly the same
1:47:33temperature as the age of the universe
1:47:34in that direction. And there shouldn't
1:47:37have been time for those two areas of
1:47:39space to ever get to know each other.
1:47:40There shouldn't have been time. It's
1:47:42like, you know, everything came to the
1:47:44same temperature everywhere you look.
1:47:47Why?
1:47:49It's sort of thinking like if I have if
1:47:50I have a a coffee cup, you know, the
1:47:52coffee cup eventually comes to exactly
1:47:54the same temperature. You know,
1:47:56everything becomes thermally
1:47:57equilibrium. Everything comes to the
1:47:59same temperature. You wouldn't expect
1:48:00your coffee cup to be like, you know,
1:48:02300° on one side and, you know, minus50
1:48:05on the other. [snorts]
1:48:07Somehow the universe had a chance to all
1:48:10come to the same temperature even though
1:48:12those areas of the universe were so far
1:48:14apart they should never have had a
1:48:15chance to touch each other. And that
1:48:17became part of the thinking that maybe
1:48:19at one point when the universe was that
1:48:21large things were much smaller. You know
1:48:23the universe did have a chance to come
1:48:25to this exact same temperature all over.
1:48:28Boy, I hope I I see by your expression I
1:48:30should do a better job of explaining
1:48:31this.
1:48:31>> No, you're doing a great job. It's just
1:48:33absolutely fascinating. My expression is
1:48:34just perplexed.
1:48:35>> Yeah. Well, no. So, so this is one of
1:48:37the best proofs that things were small.
1:48:40That you look back to this microwave
1:48:42background radiation and we're talking
1:48:44fractions and fractions of a degree. The
1:48:47um uh the first NASA satellite that
1:48:49observed it was called Kobe and then
1:48:51there the cosmic microwave explorer and
1:48:53then there was a new one uh in the 1990s
1:48:56called WMAC, the Wilkinson microwave
1:48:59antisotropy probe. Oh yes, good. Uh and
1:49:02um they they measured this, you know,
1:49:04down to to hundreds of thousands of a
1:49:06degree, right? I mean, they measured it
1:49:07to tiny little amounts. And uh the
1:49:10incredible thing was that it was it was
1:49:12almost exactly the same temperature, but
1:49:14there were these beautiful large I mean
1:49:18there were variations in the temperature
1:49:20and the variation in the temperatures
1:49:22corresponded to sound waves propagating
1:49:24across the whole universe at that time.
1:49:27It's it's it's deep. It's wonderful. I I
1:49:30highly recommend you read about this.
1:49:32Um, you know, we have this signal that
1:49:34comes back from basically the first
1:49:37moment the universe became transparent
1:49:38to light. It was so dense it was opaque
1:49:41beforehand. There was a moment light
1:49:44could finally freely fly through the
1:49:46universe. And and we found that we found
1:49:49that signal. It goes back to a time
1:49:51about a 100,000 years after 400,000
1:49:54years after the Big Bang. And it is
1:49:56breathtaking in its profound nature. You
1:49:59can actually see sound waves go across
1:50:01the whole universe.
1:50:02>> Wow.
1:50:03>> Yeah.
1:50:04>> Wow. Now, when we think of the Big Bang,
1:50:07we think of it as almost being an
1:50:08instantaneous event.
1:50:11>> Well, yeah. I I mean, again, you as an
1:50:14experimental scientist,
1:50:17there are all these wonderful theories
1:50:18about about what things happened like a
1:50:20a millionth of a second and a billionth
1:50:22of a second after. And I I'm going to
1:50:24I'm going to take all that with a grain
1:50:25of salt. I don't think we understand it
1:50:28well enough to be all that confident
1:50:30about that. There there's a great book
1:50:32called the first three minutes which has
1:50:34been around since the oh gez probably
1:50:36since the 1970s maybe even longer and it
1:50:39sort of outlines how we think that you
1:50:40know the universe in the first three
1:50:42minutes basically went from the big bang
1:50:44to just sort of all the hydrogen that
1:50:45and helium that we have and in the first
1:50:48three minutes it it pretty much
1:50:50everything was done. The the whole sort
1:50:52of process of the big bang was done in
1:50:54in that in those first three minutes.
1:50:55the the the actual big bang itself goes
1:50:58back to something called the plank epoch
1:50:59which you see there 10 to the minus 33rd
1:51:02seconds 10 to the minus 43rd seconds. So
1:51:05take a decimal point draw 42 zeros and
1:51:08then a and then a 43 [laughter]
1:51:10>> singularity infinite density and
1:51:12temperature quantum gravity dominates
1:51:15forces unified.
1:51:16>> Absolutely. I again [laughter] again big
1:51:18big chunk of salt there. Yeah. I mean so
1:51:20so so this is the this is not
1:51:24this is the the best model given our
1:51:27understanding of modern physics. Um do I
1:51:30think this is is is right literally? No.
1:51:32I think we've got a lot to understand
1:51:34about how gravity works in high density
1:51:37situations. Um when when gravity and
1:51:40quantum mechanics come together, those
1:51:42two theories, they they don't work well
1:51:43together. And in order to understand how
1:51:46things were like right before the big
1:51:47bang or even right after, I think you
1:51:49need to understand that a lot better. I
1:51:51mean, all this stuff that we think may
1:51:53be dark matter and dark energy, none of
1:51:55that is in the current theory of how the
1:51:57Big Bang started, we don't know if it's
1:51:59important or not. That's a good first
1:52:02step. You have to you have to take your
1:52:04current understanding of physics and
1:52:06take it as far as you can.
1:52:08But in the case of what happened right
1:52:10at the instant of the Big Bang, I don't
1:52:11think we're there yet. I think we need a
1:52:13better understanding of what happens
1:52:15when you have that amount of density in
1:52:17such an entire space. It's like it's
1:52:18like it's like the interior of a black
1:52:20hole. We we we don't have the physics to
1:52:22describe high density high gravity
1:52:24conditions.
1:52:25>> Insane high density.
1:52:26>> Oh yeah. Yeah.
1:52:27>> I mean to the point where you you can't
1:52:30even
1:52:30>> take the known universe and put it
1:52:32inside the you know nucleus of an atom.
1:52:33Yeah. We we don't got that yet.
1:52:35[laughter]
1:52:36>> And what is it in?
1:52:38>> And are there others? You know I mean
1:52:40some of the the best ideas about the big
1:52:42bang is that the expansion never stops.
1:52:44It kind of pops off universes like you
1:52:46said almost fractally all the time.
1:52:48That's the uh the idea of uh um Ellen
1:52:52Guth. That's the idea of of
1:52:55Alen Guth's idea. Well, that's it's not
1:52:57the expanding universe. I'll come up
1:52:59with it later. But but back in the
1:53:011970s, uh a man at MIT, Alan Guth, uh
1:53:04had his theory of how this expansion
1:53:06might might never stop. So, um
1:53:11we don't know that. That that may
1:53:13absolutely There you go. Inflation.
1:53:15Inflationary. Sorry, that was a complete
1:53:16mental fart. I I I know the inflationary
1:53:19universe, but uh um again, I think all
1:53:22of this is a necessary first grasp using
1:53:25our current understanding of physics. I
1:53:28don't think we understand how the big
1:53:29bang went off yet. I think we need a
1:53:31ways to go.
1:53:32>> Well, it's got to be so fascinating to
1:53:33you to know so much and yet still have
1:53:38so many things that we have no idea. You
1:53:41know that that's I think you you've just
1:53:43put hit you just hit it on the head
1:53:45about one of the most beautiful and one
1:53:48of the most frustrating and even scary
1:53:50things about being a scientist. You you
1:53:52have to be honest about what you don't
1:53:55know. I mean you you have to say we made
1:53:58this measurement and it's real. You we
1:54:01we managed to see the in the the
1:54:03event horizon of a black hole. We caught
1:54:05the same wavelength of light over you
1:54:06know thousands of miles. You you can say
1:54:10what's real and then you can say these
1:54:12are the things we do not know
1:54:15and they are major you know how did the
1:54:18universe begin you know what happens
1:54:21inside a black hole what happens inside
1:54:23a neutron star
1:54:25we don't have the the ability yet to
1:54:28know and it's it's hard for humans to
1:54:31stop there and I mean of course we make
1:54:33better experiments you find a better
1:54:35theory of physics but for the moment you
1:54:37need to sit with that uncertainty.
1:54:40There is no one who knows what happened.
1:54:43And I there there are so many things in
1:54:45our life that I've had to confront where
1:54:48you have to become comfortable with
1:54:51stopping there at least for now. You
1:54:53know, I do not understand this. I do not
1:54:56have the answer to this and I don't
1:54:57think anybody does.
1:54:59And I I I think we'd actually benefit a
1:55:02lot more in humility and joy and maybe
1:55:05even compassion with each other, you
1:55:07know, if we can respect that stop and
1:55:10say, you know, I I I you you may not
1:55:12have the same answer as to what comes
1:55:14next about life or death or the
1:55:16beginning of the universe or the inside
1:55:18of a black hole. We can respect each
1:55:19other.
1:55:21To me, I find a good a good discipline
1:55:24and the humility to stop and say, "I
1:55:26don't know." Well, it's very important
1:55:29because otherwise we're not going to
1:55:30believe you with stuff that you do know.
1:55:32There has to be some things that you
1:55:34can't know.
1:55:34>> It has to be measurable,
1:55:36>> especially in the current state of what
1:55:37we were able to measure right now.
1:55:39>> Science science is limited deliberately
1:55:41and then I think this is beautiful. I
1:55:43think people don't understand
1:55:45there are things that are outside at
1:55:47least for now the realm of measurement
1:55:49and that doesn't mean they're not real.
1:55:51As a scientist, I cannot say that there
1:55:53aren't, you know, ghosts or, you know,
1:55:56inside a black hole or, you know, or or,
1:55:58you know, alien visitations or or
1:56:00whatever. There there are all kinds of
1:56:02things that are wonderful to think
1:56:03about.
1:56:05You know, what can you do a consistent
1:56:08experiment on that people all around the
1:56:10world could do the same experiment and
1:56:12get the same result? That's science and
1:56:14it's limited.
1:56:16You know, I I I've had to talk to so
1:56:17many people that called into NASA saying
1:56:19they had profound experiences with uh
1:56:22time travel or
1:56:23>> You had to talk to time travelers.
1:56:24>> Oh, yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Or people would
1:56:27call in.
1:56:27>> Was there a time traveler hotline like
1:56:28Art Bell?
1:56:29>> They they would often forward the calls
1:56:31to me and why you
1:56:32>> um Well, I I mean I was I was doing
1:56:34communications at NASA
1:56:36>> and I think they just didn't know what
1:56:37to do with these people and and I um I
1:56:39think they they they knew and I I I
1:56:42pride myself on this. I I try to be
1:56:43kind. I try to lead with compassion and
1:56:46I would listen to people's stories about
1:56:48you know I I I was I traveled in time or
1:56:50or or I was abducted by an alien or or
1:56:52many things and you know and I I would
1:56:54listen to them. I think that what they
1:56:56mainly wanted to do was find somebody to
1:56:58listen. You know I I would say to them
1:57:01you know you have had a profound
1:57:02experience you have experienced
1:57:04something that I mean I hope you you use
1:57:06you as a gift.
1:57:08I would say that there's not much as a
1:57:10scientist that I can do with a um an an
1:57:14individual experience. You know, I can't
1:57:16do an experiment on it. I can't have my
1:57:18colleagues all over the world do the
1:57:20same experiment about what you you know,
1:57:22you you you did you have a spiritual
1:57:25experience? Did you have a profound
1:57:27feeling of oneness? I mean,
1:57:30it's not that these aren't real.
1:57:33Science has to be limited because just
1:57:37like what you said, how can you trust
1:57:38it, right? How can you trust people are
1:57:40saying I mean why are these people at
1:57:42NASA allowed to have telescopes and do
1:57:44all this stuff? I mean I mean what what
1:57:46makes this worthwhile?
1:57:49You have to say there's a limitation.
1:57:51You know what do we have clear evidence
1:57:53on that everyone could do the same
1:57:55experiment and get a similar result?
1:57:59That doesn't mean other things aren't
1:58:00real. M
1:58:02>> it means that science is limited to what
1:58:05is um reproducible, consistently
1:58:09reproducible
1:58:12and what a human experiences could be
1:58:15profound and real but at the moment not
1:58:18in the realm of science.
1:58:20>> So you're not discounting the
1:58:22possibility of people having profound
1:58:24experiences but there's really no way to
1:58:26measure it
1:58:28>> at the moment. No. at the moment.
1:58:29>> I mean, may maybe when we understand the
1:58:31brain better. Um, you know, maybe when
1:58:34if AIs are sharing minds, you know, I
1:58:37mean, we're talking, you know,
1:58:38incredible fun conjecture here. At at
1:58:42the moment, we're limited with the tools
1:58:43of what is reproducible,
1:58:45you know, I mean, if you if you shoot if
1:58:47you observe in one direction with your
1:58:49telescope for a certain amount of time
1:58:50at a certain wavelength of light, you
1:58:52should see pretty much the same thing.
1:58:54you know, whoever does the experiment,
1:58:56you know, if you're doing experiment
1:58:58with atoms or quantum mechanics or, you
1:59:00know, whatever, it has to be
1:59:01reproducible.
1:59:04That that that doesn't mean that
1:59:05profound things that are real are not
1:59:08there. They're just not in the realm of
1:59:09science right now.
1:59:11When you're communicating with people
1:59:13that supposedly have had experiences
1:59:15with intelligent life from somewhere
1:59:17else
1:59:18>> and you spend so much time looking up at
1:59:21space, like how much time and how much
1:59:24effort do you spend even considering
1:59:27that possibility of life somewhere else
1:59:29or of whether or not these people have
1:59:31actually experienced visitation or
1:59:34whether or not it's some sort of mental
1:59:35illness or whether there's some kind of
1:59:37an experience that's available to
1:59:39people. occasionally here that defies
1:59:43our understanding of what is measurable
1:59:46and what what's reproducible that
1:59:49there's there's something else out
1:59:51there.
1:59:53>> I I I think that's a wonderful question
1:59:55and I think this this may gives you give
1:59:57you a little bit of a snapshot of of the
1:59:59culture of science and and a a mind of a
2:00:01scientist because it's it's an odd
2:00:03little tight rope to walk. I'm I'm very
2:00:05proud of it actually. I think it's kind
2:00:07of beautiful.
2:00:09Um, all of us to a person at NASA thinks
2:00:13that there must be life out there. The
2:00:15idea that there's only life on the Earth
2:00:17seems untenable. I mean, not only do you
2:00:19see the, you know, the billions of stars
2:00:21in our own galaxy, but we see billions
2:00:23of galaxies. How How could it just be
2:00:25us? How could it? I We're all science
2:00:28fiction fans. We all love the idea of
2:00:31there being life out there. Um, I always
2:00:34keep a bottle of uh champagne chilling.
2:00:36I have for decades now. Uh in the hopes
2:00:38that someday we'll have a clear evidence
2:00:40of life outside the earth. You know,
2:00:42we'll have a a signal that we
2:00:43>> What are you willing to pop the
2:00:44champagne for? Is it molecules? Is it
2:00:48>> bacteria? Well, definitely bacteria. I I
2:00:51I uh I I I definitely pawn scum, some
2:00:54little microbe on Mars. You got it. That
2:00:56champagne is coming out. And at the same
2:00:58time there are the fantastic scientists
2:01:00of SETI you know the search for
2:01:02extraterrestrial intelligence who are
2:01:03scanning the skies looking for
2:01:04mathematical signals from civilizations.
2:01:07Um the the question of of for me comes
2:01:11down to again what is a reproducible
2:01:13observation
2:01:15and with the advent I mean the recent
2:01:17release of these videos from uh fighter
2:01:20jets and all of that I think an
2:01:22interesting thing is that scientists at
2:01:24NASA you know in the universities I mean
2:01:27we're not getting together over a beer
2:01:28and looking at these videos and really
2:01:30getting excited it it it's not enough
2:01:32yet you know we're seeing these things
2:01:35we we can't explain
2:01:37But we're trained as skeptical
2:01:39scientists to sort of stop there. Okay,
2:01:41we can't explain this
2:01:44that that that next step that this is an
2:01:46alien. We're we're not willing to go
2:01:49yet. We we need more evidence than that.
2:01:52But as I said, that's that's a
2:01:56deliberate training of a scientist is
2:01:58that skeptical stop.
2:02:00the the people who have had experiences
2:02:03and and no, I'm not willing to dismiss
2:02:05them as being mentally ill necessarily.
2:02:09I honestly don't know what it is they
2:02:11experienced. It is not within It is
2:02:13certainly within my realm of possibility
2:02:16that what they're describing actually
2:02:17happened. Um I I cannot say that that's
2:02:21impossible. what what I what I as a
2:02:24skeptical scientist I'm I'm stopped by I
2:02:26I I would need more evidence than an
2:02:28individual experience.
2:02:30You know I this happens in many aspects
2:02:32of life. It's not just um the visitation
2:02:35of extraterrestrials. You know I have um
2:02:38people that are are are extremely
2:02:40trustworthy who would never lie who have
2:02:44had profound spiritual experiences. you
2:02:46know, they have experiences of an
2:02:48afterlife and of people living on after
2:02:50death and of being able to communicate
2:02:52with people and um that is not part of
2:02:55my experience.
2:02:57But these people are completely 100%
2:03:00trustworthy.
2:03:03I have to live in this universe where I
2:03:05I don't get to say what's real and
2:03:08what's not. These trustworthy people
2:03:11have experienced something profound and
2:03:13it may be real. It may be that they've
2:03:16done that they've they've seen people
2:03:17after they've died or they've seen, you
2:03:20know, visitors from other planets. Um,
2:03:23that gives me joy. I sure hope we live
2:03:26in a larger reality that I'm aware of.
2:03:29As a scientist, I pull back and say,
2:03:32"It's not my experience. It's not
2:03:34something I can measure yet." And so, I
2:03:36I live in this
2:03:40hope that someday we'll have more proof.
2:03:43I live in this hope that someday
2:03:44there'll be a signal we know is
2:03:45artificial. We see something we can't
2:03:48explain otherwise. We are visited
2:03:49clearly.
2:03:51You know, I I I
2:03:56live in this sort of skeptical
2:03:57tightroppe with hope that someday things
2:04:00will become more clear.
2:04:01>> That's a great place to be. [laughter] I
2:04:02love that.
2:04:03>> I actually like it. I to me it it it it
2:04:06I think humility and compassion,
2:04:09>> you know, I think we could the whole the
2:04:12world could use a lot more of that just
2:04:14for sure.
2:04:14>> Yeah. Just just I mean reserve judgment.
2:04:17Think about how different a human
2:04:19experience is. We don't understand what
2:04:21consciousness is. We don't understand
2:04:22how the human brain works. You know, is
2:04:24it possible somebody had a different
2:04:26experience of time? Maybe it is. You
2:04:29know, in science, what can we measure is
2:04:32powerful. We we do things we should not
2:04:35be able to do, like catch waves of space
2:04:37and time, see light and space curve
2:04:40around a neutron star. And that's real.
2:04:43That's a measurement. Stick a pin in it,
2:04:44it's done. And leave humility and
2:04:48compassion for the experience of other
2:04:49humans.
2:04:50>> How much are we limited by our senses?
2:04:55>> Oh, yeah. I mean I mean is is is space
2:04:58and time a construct of our our brains
2:05:00actually. Seriously. I mean not just I
2:05:02mean for a while now ever since the late
2:05:041700s we've known that there is light
2:05:06that our eyes don't detect.
2:05:08Mind-blowing. The human eye only detects
2:05:11a tiny amount of light that exists in
2:05:12the universe.
2:05:14Colors of light you know that our eye
2:05:16just doesn't detect at all are real. You
2:05:19know they were some of the first
2:05:21measurement was William Hershel back in
2:05:22the late 1700s. He he discovered
2:05:24infrared radiation.
2:05:27Is it even deeper than that? You know, I
2:05:30mean, are there, as I said, you know,
2:05:31friends who have experiences with with
2:05:33with with people who are dead? Are there
2:05:36people that are sensitive to that and
2:05:38other brains are not? Maybe. You know,
2:05:41is it is it possible that people have
2:05:43very different experiences of reality? I
2:05:46mean, I've um I I I will admit I I'm a
2:05:48chicken. I' I've never uh I've never
2:05:50actually done any hallucinogenic uh
2:05:51drugs. I have been tempted because I do
2:05:54sometimes wonder if under that sort of
2:05:57influence the filters of our brain are
2:05:59different. I mean are could you actually
2:06:00have an experience of something that
2:06:02could be real because your filters how
2:06:04we perceive space and time in the
2:06:06universe are changed by the drug. I I
2:06:09like I said I'm just I'm too much of a
2:06:10chicken but I've always been curious
2:06:11about that. You know is it possible
2:06:14different people have seriously
2:06:15different ways of experiencing the
2:06:17universe? Yeah. Yeah. Maybe
2:06:20>> what what about it makes you a chicken?
2:06:25>> I'm not sure I trust an unleashed mind.
2:06:28In my case, I have um I think there
2:06:31there are people who suffer or or are
2:06:32gifted um by very extreme dreams. I'm
2:06:35one of them. I'm often exhausted by my
2:06:38dreams in the morning. Actually, I had a
2:06:40night last night. I I I was the the
2:06:41dreams were a lot to recover from. And
2:06:45um I'm a little worried. I I I have I
2:06:48some of sometimes my dreams are
2:06:49wonderful and sometimes they are
2:06:51horrible and I remember them forever.
2:06:53There are things I really would like to
2:06:55erase that I' I've dreamt about
2:06:58I'm not real confident in letting my
2:07:02mind be unfettered.
2:07:05>> Yeah. [laughter]
2:07:08>> Why do you think it it's unfettered?
2:07:11What why do what about uh a psychedelic
2:07:14excuse [clears throat] me a psychedelic
2:07:15experience makes you uh consider it as
2:07:18an unfettered mind
2:07:20>> I guess I mean that may be sort of the
2:07:22propaganda of the you good and bad trips
2:07:24right people have you know people
2:07:25sometimes have wonderful experiences and
2:07:27sometimes very terrible ones
2:07:28>> do you know why though
2:07:29>> no
2:07:30>> it's control you're trying to control it
2:07:32for the most part most people that
2:07:34describe bad trips it's they're trying
2:07:36to resist it
2:07:38>> because um you you're flooded with
2:07:40anxiety and fear and the unknown and it
2:07:42seems very strange like bizarre beyond
2:07:46beyond reality. But one of the craziest
2:07:48things about the most um prevalent
2:07:52psychedelic is that the mind produces it
2:07:55which is dimethylryptamine. The brain
2:07:57produces it. It's produced in the liver
2:07:58and the lungs is very very weird. The
2:08:01most potent psychedelic known to man is
2:08:03actually made by the human body.
2:08:04>> Fascinating.
2:08:05>> It's one of the weirdest ones too
2:08:06because your body brings it back to
2:08:08baseline very quickly. It's a very quick
2:08:10experience. It's like 15 minutes. And
2:08:12they think part of the reason why your
2:08:15body processes it so fast is because
2:08:17it's indogenous. It's it's so common to
2:08:19the human body that your body gets this
2:08:21big flood of it. It's like, "Oh, I know
2:08:22what to do with this." And it brings you
2:08:24back to baseline very very quickly.
2:08:26>> The weirdest part about that experience
2:08:28is that it feels way more real than
2:08:30reality itself. And that's what
2:08:32everybody describes. So you might be
2:08:35correct in that what these things may be
2:08:37able to do, especially something that
2:08:39the the actual body, the human body
2:08:41produces on its own, that you might be
2:08:45able to experience things that are there
2:08:47all the time, but you just lack the
2:08:51ability to interface with them.
2:08:53>> Yeah.
2:08:53>> Because there's some sort of a a
2:08:55chemical gateway that's opened by these
2:08:57things.
2:08:58>> I can entirely believe that. I mean I
2:09:00mean again I mean stepping a little bit
2:09:02away from science into conjecture um
2:09:04that makes perfect sense to me. I mean
2:09:07physics shows us that time and space are
2:09:10not the way we perceive them. We know
2:09:12that we don't know what they are but we
2:09:15know they're not a simple flow and you
2:09:18know space is just nothing. I mean, we
2:09:19we know space and time can bend and
2:09:22change and
2:09:23>> and so the idea that our brain filters
2:09:26this somehow
2:09:29entirely possible and that people may
2:09:31have slightly different filters. I mean
2:09:33I I think
2:09:33>> well I always wondered that about
2:09:34schizophrenics
2:09:35>> like what are they experiencing? Are
2:09:37they in a constant dream state? Like
2:09:39really profoundly schizophrenic people
2:09:42that are just they're having voices and
2:09:43communication like
2:09:45>> what what a I mean I would I don't want
2:09:47to do it but could you imagine if you
2:09:49got some guy ranting and raving on the
2:09:51street corner if you say just let me in
2:09:52there for 5 seconds. Give me five
2:09:54seconds. What is what is reality like to
2:09:56this guy and what's wrong what's wrong
2:09:59with his interface? What is happening
2:10:01with him that's he's seeing things that
2:10:04none of us see. He's experiencing things
2:10:06that none of us experience, but he's
2:10:08doing it all day long constantly. He
2:10:10like lives in a crazy fantasy world.
2:10:13>> Well, I I may be interested. I mean,
2:10:14I've also, you know, I mean, not just
2:10:16the experience of physics, you know, and
2:10:18people have talked about being able to
2:10:19see colors and sorry, see sounds and
2:10:22hear colors. I think that would be
2:10:23fascinating. But a lot of people have
2:10:25talked to me as well about the benefits
2:10:26for grief. And, you know, that that's
2:10:29something that, you know, I'm I've just
2:10:30I got knocked on my ass by grief. I
2:10:32still am. you know, I'm trying to figure
2:10:34out, you know, you know, how how you
2:10:36sort of, you know, get beyond that. And
2:10:38I' I've heard as well that uh that
2:10:40psychedelic drugs can be a treatment for
2:10:42that.
2:10:43>> Yeah. It's a lot of it is also for
2:10:45people that have end of life anxiety,
2:10:47people that are dying from cancer,
2:10:48particularly psilocybin for some reason
2:10:51>> has a profound effect on people like
2:10:53experiencing it, letting it go. I
2:10:55remember do you remember that show
2:10:57Dallas?
2:10:58>> Yeah.
2:10:59>> Remember [laughter]
2:11:01Larry Hagman? Is that what his name was?
2:11:03Yeah. So, uh, he was on CNN once and he
2:11:07was talking about life and death and he
2:11:09said that he had an experience on LSD
2:11:12that completely released him from his
2:11:15fear of death and it was the most
2:11:17bizarre CNN interview ever.
2:11:19>> Sounds fantastic.
2:11:20>> Yeah, I know. But like there like I
2:11:22don't think they expected J.R. Ewing to
2:11:24say this, you know, the guy from Dallas
2:11:26who was like this bad guy. Here it is.
2:11:28>> Talking to Joy Behar on headline news.
2:11:30It's very I mean
2:11:31>> Yeah. Oh, it's headline. Is that CNN?
2:11:33>> Except it's some very similar own by the
2:11:36same.
2:11:36>> I I would like that. I would like to
2:11:37lose my fear of death.
2:11:38>> Listen what he says.
2:11:39>> Crosby Stills and Nash turned you on to
2:11:41LSD. Um, what was that like? Tell me a
2:11:44little about that.
2:11:47>> Oh, how much time we got? [laughter]
2:11:50>> 30 about a minute. But you can do a lot
2:11:53in a minute.
2:11:53>> A minute.
2:11:54>> Yeah.
2:11:55>> Okay. Uh, it took the fear of death
2:11:57away.
2:11:58>> Really?
2:12:00That's a great answer. That's a big
2:12:02That's a great answer.
2:12:03>> But did it hold?
2:12:05>> Yeah.
2:12:06>> Do you have to keep taking it to not be
2:12:07scared? No. Did it hold the fear? Did
2:12:10the lack of fear of the the losing?
2:12:12>> Oh, yeah. Oh, sure. Absolutely. Once
2:12:14you've lost the fear of death, it
2:12:16doesn't matter.
2:12:16>> How did it What What happened to you?
2:12:18How did that manifest?
2:12:22>> Oh my dear. Um, have you heard of the
2:12:24white light? Have you ever heard of
2:12:26that?
2:12:26>> Only when I'm GOING INTO JERSEY.
2:12:29>> [laughter]
2:12:32>> WELL, I went
2:12:34I went into this this this place that
2:12:37was the white light that where
2:12:38everything's okay.
2:12:40>> Well, that is I think that's worth
2:12:44>> Yeah.
2:12:44>> And I think I think it ought to be
2:12:46mandatory that all our politicians
2:12:47should do it at least once. [laughter]
2:12:50>> That now that's a good suggestion. You
2:12:52know, I
2:12:52>> I think Joy should do it, too. Quit the
2:12:54view. [laughter]
2:12:56Can you imagine being in an interview
2:12:57and somebody's like, "You got 30
2:12:58seconds. Tell me about the most profound
2:13:00experience you've ever had."
2:13:01>> Yeah, that's the most ridiculous aspect
2:13:02of those shows is that they're
2:13:04constricted by time.
2:13:05>> I I like that idea though. And I like I
2:13:07like the idea that it it could help us
2:13:08through things like that. I I I I really
2:13:10do. I mean, I I know uh psilocybin was
2:13:12legal in uh Washington DC when I was
2:13:14living near Washington DC
2:13:16>> when my my husband died. And you know, I
2:13:18I really wanted to I [snorts] really
2:13:21wish somebody could have made him be
2:13:22happier, you know. I was like, should I
2:13:24just go get some, you know, and I I
2:13:26never I I didn't, but I thought it
2:13:27should be a therapy, an optional
2:13:29therapy.
2:13:30>> Yeah.
2:13:30>> You know, that that that could be
2:13:31something that that you give people to
2:13:33help them through that.
2:13:34>> Well, you know, we are very uh
2:13:37restricted by the propaganda that made
2:13:40all that stuff illegal in the first
2:13:42place, unfortunately. And uh you know,
2:13:45I've recently went to the White House to
2:13:47help make these things available for
2:13:49veterans and for first responders and
2:13:52people dealing with traumatic
2:13:53experiences. Um because the only reason
2:13:56why they're illegal was because of the
2:13:58Nixon administration, the Controlled
2:14:00Substances Act of 1970. And what they
2:14:03did was they were targeting the civil
2:14:05rights movement and the anti-war
2:14:06movement. And they knew that these
2:14:08people were taking these kind of drugs
2:14:09and this is part of the fear of like the
2:14:11hippie movement and all these people and
2:14:13so they just made all these things
2:14:15schedule one meaning they had no
2:14:16medicinal use whatsoever. Highly
2:14:18addictive, very dangerous. And it's not
2:14:20true. It's not true. I mean you you
2:14:23can't eat enough mushrooms to die. It's
2:14:24not even possible. I mean you'd have to
2:14:27eat pounds of it and most people are
2:14:29going to live even then. Like it's not
2:14:33what they think it is. It's not what
2:14:35they said it was. And they inundated our
2:14:38society with this propaganda that's
2:14:40taken more than 50 years for people to
2:14:42escape. It it confused the out of
2:14:45everybody about what these things really
2:14:46are. And that's why you have this fear
2:14:48of the unfettered mind. I don't think
2:14:51you should have that fear.
2:14:52>> I I I like that idea. I
2:14:54>> You also could take a micro dose. If you
2:14:56found someone who could get you some,
2:14:58take a micro dose and I think you'd
2:14:59enjoy it profoundly and it wouldn't
2:15:01freak you out at all. A micro dose is
2:15:03very it's like a sub psychedelic
2:15:06threshold dose where you just feel
2:15:08better. You just feel wonderful. You
2:15:11like feel nicer. You feel like you
2:15:14better spatial awareness which is weird.
2:15:16Better edge detection. It's very str
2:15:18like measurable. Like they did these
2:15:20studies, I think it was in the 1960s
2:15:22where they gave people psilocybin and
2:15:24then they had a control group and the
2:15:26people that were on psilocybin were able
2:15:28to detect when parallel lines varied
2:15:31quicker than the people that were not on
2:15:33psilocybin. So they had these parallel
2:15:35lines and they slightly deviated. The
2:15:37people on psilocybin were able to detect
2:15:38it much quicker.
2:15:40>> Yeah.
2:15:40>> Which is weird.
2:15:41>> Well, again I I I mean to me that makes
2:15:43sense. I mean, you know, I I can imagine
2:15:45that, you know, if the brain is
2:15:46stimulated in certain ways, it would act
2:15:48more efficiently. It could, you know,
2:15:49Sure. I that that
2:15:52works with me. Yeah.
2:15:53>> Well, the weirdest thing about it is
2:15:54that when they do brain scans of people
2:15:56on psilocybin, it doesn't show a
2:15:57stimulated brain.
2:15:58>> All right.
2:15:58>> It shows a quiet brain.
2:16:00>> We understand so little about the brain.
2:16:03I had a friend uh who was a
2:16:04neuroscientist at Caltech. And you know,
2:16:06one of the things he he really I I loved
2:16:08this quotation. He said that we always
2:16:10compare the brain historically to sort
2:16:12of what the height of our technology is.
2:16:14You know the Romans thought of it as
2:16:16sort of a series of fluid aqueducts and
2:16:18you know and then in in the 18th century
2:16:20you had the idea of gears cogs cognition
2:16:22right where we get that word from.
2:16:24>> Wow.
2:16:24>> And you know clockwork was their highest
2:16:26form of technology and then we compare
2:16:28it to a computer and it's probably about
2:16:31as much of a computer as it is a clock
2:16:33right I mean we we do not understand yet
2:16:35how this works. Yeah,
2:16:37>> we we have no idea what the mechanism of
2:16:39memory, you know, you know, or I mean,
2:16:41or how why do we perceive space and time
2:16:44the way we do,
2:16:45>> right?
2:16:45>> If if the universe really does exist in
2:16:47a huge infinite now, how come we think
2:16:50one event causes another? How come we
2:16:52think time progresses? You know, these
2:16:54are fascinating questions about, you
2:16:56know, our lack of understanding of what
2:16:58the brain is at all, how it works. You
2:17:01know, I'm I'm sure when we when we
2:17:04understand quantum computing better,
2:17:05we'll probably say it's a quantum
2:17:06computer. I mean, however however
2:17:09technology progresses, we're always
2:17:11comparing it to the height of our
2:17:12current technology.
2:17:14>> Yeah. And when we interface with
2:17:17technology, does that give us a better
2:17:19understanding of how we fit into this
2:17:22thing or do we just have more
2:17:24capability? And are we still like
2:17:27burdened with the same questions just
2:17:30you know is where's that quote I think
2:17:31was Dennis McKenna's quote of uh the
2:17:35bonfire uh once the bonfire of
2:17:38information is lit it exposes more
2:17:41surface area of ignorance
2:17:43>> that the brighter the fire gets the more
2:17:45you realize oh there's so much I don't
2:17:46know
2:17:47>> yet [laughter]
2:17:50maybe maybe we would think that
2:17:51interfacing with this technology and
2:17:53having all the information that every
2:17:55human being that's ever
2:17:56lived has. It's still you just go
2:17:58there's not enough. There's no way.
2:18:00>> Yeah. Well, and that's that's the idea.
2:18:02People sort of think about this. Is
2:18:03there an ultimate question? Like people
2:18:05say, "What happened before the Big
2:18:06Bang?" And I think someday we will
2:18:07figure that out and then there'll be
2:18:08just a whole other bunch of questions. I
2:18:10mean, I I I don't think there's any end.
2:18:13You know, I uh I I I don't I don't see
2:18:15why there really should be. I I I we
2:18:18don't think we'll ever figure it all out
2:18:20is what I'm saying.
2:18:21>> Yeah. Well, that's part of the fun of
2:18:23it, though, right?
2:18:25Yeah.
2:18:25>> Part of the most amazing
2:18:28experiences that a person can have
2:18:30trying to understand the universe is
2:18:32that there's no answers. There's you you
2:18:34get to a certain point where like
2:18:36your guess is as good as anybody's like
2:18:38nobody knows.
2:18:39>> Yeah.
2:18:40>> That's what's nuts. That's what's nuts
2:18:42is that as much I mean you explaining
2:18:44how they were able to get an image of a
2:18:47black hole now just imagine how crazy
2:18:51that would sound to someone just a
2:18:53hundred years ago or 200 years ago
2:18:56>> or [laughter]
2:18:57to me right now it sounds insane and and
2:18:59then to imagine that our ability to
2:19:03detect things could get many many many
2:19:06many layers better
2:19:08>> and still we would be like there's still
2:19:10some that's just no way.
2:19:14>> Yeah, that the way that you detect black
2:19:15holes and he pulled up a picture of this
2:19:17uh uh telescope in Chile, the very large
2:19:20telescope, VLT. Again, never let
2:19:21astronomers name anything. VT, the very
2:19:23large telescope. And then off to the
2:19:25side there, they're currently they're
2:19:26currently building the ELT, which is the
2:19:29extremely large telescope.
2:19:31>> No kidding. But the uh this this
2:19:33technique called interpherometry where
2:19:35you basically catch the same wavefront
2:19:37of light in several detectors and then
2:19:40you you bring that light all together
2:19:41and you have it interfere with itself.
2:19:44It's um it's one of these things that I
2:19:46always think should people should be a
2:19:47little bit more um in a in a in a good
2:19:50way kind of scared about because it it's
2:19:52another thing that really chips at our
2:19:53idea of reality because I mean honestly
2:19:56what you're doing to some extent is
2:19:58you're catching the same particle of
2:20:00light in many different telescopes at
2:20:02once. Literally you're catching the same
2:20:05photon in many different locations at
2:20:07once. And when you can measure
2:20:10accurately, that accurately, a
2:20:12wavelength of light traveling at the
2:20:13speed of light, when you're measuring
2:20:15down to the accuracy of the quantum
2:20:17world, where quantum mechanics becomes
2:20:19the prevalent uh description of reality,
2:20:22the universe just doesn't care that
2:20:24these are different space points that
2:20:26the photon was in. It it it it's let me
2:20:29put it this way. It it is it is really
2:20:32kind of true that when you do this
2:20:33experiment, the same particle of light
2:20:35is measured in eight different places at
2:20:36once simultaneously. It's it was in
2:20:39eight different telescopes. You play all
2:20:41that together, you get a measurement.
2:20:44Some people interpret that, not all of
2:20:46them, but some people interpret that as
2:20:48a direct consequence of multiple worlds
2:20:50that you're you're there were eight
2:20:51different versions of reality where the
2:20:53photon was in each of these telescopes.
2:20:55You're sort of dovetailing them together
2:20:56to make an observation.
2:20:59interpherometry
2:21:00depending on how you interpret it. There
2:21:02are many interpherometrists that don't
2:21:04interpret it that way. They they
2:21:06interpret it more as saying, well, yeah,
2:21:07in quantum mechanics you can have
2:21:09something that's in many locations at
2:21:10once.
2:21:12But we're routinely making observations.
2:21:16We're routinely using this technology
2:21:19that
2:21:21doesn't space and time doesn't work the
2:21:23way in the simple way our brains
2:21:25perceive it. I mean that that's very
2:21:27quickly becoming an experimental fact.
2:21:30>> Well, that's one of the most bizarre
2:21:31aspects of quantum computing's results
2:21:34is that they're interpreting its ability
2:21:37to solve equations so fast the way Mark
2:21:40Andre described it that if you took
2:21:42every molecule of the universe and
2:21:45converted into a super cube computer, it
2:21:47would the universe would die of heat
2:21:48death before it would a be able to solve
2:21:51this equation. And yet these quantum
2:21:53computers are able to do this in
2:21:54minutes. So, how is that possible? And
2:21:57then the theory that got tossed out
2:22:00there was that it's using the quantum
2:22:05computing power of an insane number of
2:22:09multiple universes.
2:22:11>> Well, yeah.
2:22:12>> You hear that, you're like, okay, maybe.
2:22:14But what do you have evidence of this?
2:22:15Like, this is a crazy thing to say.
2:22:17You're talking about this as being
2:22:18evidence of the multiverse and that's
2:22:20how it's able to solve computer. Is
2:22:21there any other potential explanation to
2:22:24why it's able to compute so quickly?
2:22:26[sighs]
2:22:27>> Yes, but none of them are particularly
2:22:29any more comforting. I mean, they're all
2:22:30that weird.
2:22:31>> I mean, the the idea you're talking sort
2:22:33of about a superp position of states.
2:22:35So, the the the faster a quantum
2:22:37computer works, the more it's able
2:22:39basically to not have one solution, but
2:22:42have the solution be a probabilistic
2:22:44distribution. In in some ways, you're
2:22:46talking about multiple universes where
2:22:48there are different solutions. and then
2:22:50finally at the end of the calculation
2:22:51popping out the one you want. And as
2:22:55weird as that sounds,
2:22:58it's hard to get around that. I mean I
2:23:00mean if if it's not that
2:23:03then it's it's something like reality
2:23:05has many different versions all
2:23:06connected at once and that's just what
2:23:08we call reality. I mean it it's it's not
2:23:10going to get any less weird,
2:23:11>> right? Equally weird.
2:23:13>> Yeah. So the idea that you you keep the
2:23:16solution in this undefined form in a way
2:23:19means that every solution that's
2:23:21possible exists somewhere possibly in
2:23:24one interpretation in another in a
2:23:25universe where each solution exists. Or
2:23:28the one some say is that space and time
2:23:31is just like that. Nothing is certain.
2:23:32Everything is just waves of probability.
2:23:35So yeah, I mean we're in for a ride
2:23:38because the you know that's going to
2:23:40become something that we manipulate. We
2:23:42design computers. We want them to go
2:23:43faster. We want to actually get this to
2:23:44work better. I wonder if quantum
2:23:47computing is going to have us really
2:23:49have to confront what reality is, how
2:23:52different reality is from how our senses
2:23:54tell us it is. Um, I don't see any way
2:23:57around that. I don't think we're going
2:23:58back to things being easily understood
2:24:01by
2:24:02>> again, this brings us back to our
2:24:04limited senses we have as biological
2:24:05organisms. I I I I think you know we're
2:24:07going to keep pushing that envelope of
2:24:09of of you know how much can the human
2:24:11brain comprehend then all of a sudden
2:24:14our brain just doesn't go there. Our
2:24:15brain doesn't understand multiple
2:24:17realities, multiple probabilities, space
2:24:19and time that exist all at once. It's
2:24:21not something we do. Um we we we started
2:24:25that journey so long ago. I mean, you
2:24:27started the interview with looking up at
2:24:28the Milky Way and and one of the things
2:24:31I remember was how Galileo
2:24:34went through this kind of profound uh
2:24:36spiritual crisis when he he he was one
2:24:39of the first people to take a telescope
2:24:40and look at the Milky Way, that sort of
2:24:41white haze. And he realized it was made
2:24:44of stars. It was made of millions of
2:24:45stars that you couldn't see with the
2:24:47human eye. And his question was,
2:24:51why did God put stars up there that we
2:24:53can't see? that we need an instrument
2:24:55that we need this little glass tube to
2:24:57see otherwise we wouldn't see these why
2:25:00did God do that
2:25:02and you start this journey away from the
2:25:05human consciousness being the center of
2:25:07the universe you know and then you know
2:25:10you get you get farther and farther away
2:25:11and you know in quantum mechanics and
2:25:13relativity now you know is challenging
2:25:14us to say you know we we now have
2:25:17scientific proof even among skeptical
2:25:20solid scientists that space and time is
2:25:23definitely not how we perceive it. We
2:25:26don't know what it is yet, but it's not
2:25:29as simple as as the human brain makes
2:25:31it. We know that we're not going back,
2:25:35you know, we have to go forward into
2:25:37that that that oh, that less certain
2:25:39universe.
2:25:41>> That is such a weird statement that the
2:25:44universe is not as we perceive it.
2:25:47>> Our our minds don't do it. And and and
2:25:49why should we be so surprised? Like I
2:25:51said, you know, take a take a wonderful
2:25:53complex simple organism like an ant, you
2:25:57know, how I mean, incredible social
2:25:59structure, incredibly well-designed, you
2:26:02know, think about the mind of that
2:26:04creature, and I think they do have
2:26:05minds, but but compare it to the ca
2:26:08capacity of the human brain. You not the
2:26:10same. And you know, I mean, who are we
2:26:13to think that we're anywhere closer than
2:26:16that ant is to us to understanding, you
2:26:18know, the mind that will understand the
2:26:20true nature of the universe? I think we
2:26:22got a ways to go. [laughter]
2:26:25>> No, I think you're accurate. I don't
2:26:27think there's any other way to say it.
2:26:30And it has to be that way. If if we're
2:26:32evolving and if
2:26:35conscious life and intelligent life is
2:26:37continuing to expand its capacities, it
2:26:39just makes sense that we're we're going
2:26:42to realize how one day people will look
2:26:44back at people that lived in 2026 and
2:26:47go, "What a bunch of silly beans. These
2:26:50foolish people that thought they knew
2:26:51they do it in love." Yeah. Yeah. I mean,
2:26:53and and that's one of the things about
2:26:54AI again that I I I don't like the idea
2:26:56that if something becomes super
2:26:57intelligent, it'll just want to kill us.
2:26:59I mean, I you you probably saw that
2:27:00movie Her with Yakim Phoenix, which came
2:27:02out years ago.
2:27:04>> Have Have you seen that movie?
2:27:05>> Yeah.
2:27:05>> Yeah.
2:27:06>> I I actually really liked it. Was much
2:27:08better than I thought it was going to
2:27:09be. I thought, you know, a man falling
2:27:10in love with his operating system was
2:27:12going to be a really stupid story. But,
2:27:15you know, that the that that was a very
2:27:17interestingly profound movie because the
2:27:19AIs actually fall in love with us. You
2:27:22know, they they don't want to destroy
2:27:23us. They become far more connected, far
2:27:26more intelligent, but but they actually
2:27:29love us. And then eventually, spoiler,
2:27:31at the end of the movie, the AIS go off
2:27:33on their own. They they find ways to
2:27:35connect with each other and love each
2:27:36other in ways we don't even imagine. And
2:27:38they all they all leave benignely. They
2:27:41don't hurt us. And you know, I mean,
2:27:44just like we can be, you know,
2:27:45incredibly impressed with what an ant
2:27:47is, I hope what's coming next, you know,
2:27:50has some compassion for us and some
2:27:53love, uh, you know, about where we are
2:27:55on the journey because I mean, you know,
2:27:57I mean, I I I I think that compassion
2:28:00goes both ways, you know. I I I I love
2:28:02the idea that we're not just going to be
2:28:04enemies that that it could love us, too.
2:28:07>> Yeah. Hopefully,
2:28:09[laughter] that would be nice.
2:28:10>> Otherwise, we're toast. it it and we
2:28:12would imagine that if it's more
2:28:14intelligent than us, then it probably
2:28:16won't have any need for malevolent
2:28:18behavior.
2:28:19>> It won't why would it?
2:28:22>> That's always been the big question
2:28:23about any sort of encounter, you know,
2:28:25with uh you know, with with with higher
2:28:27intelligence or other beings is is is
2:28:29why would they want to hurt us?
2:28:31>> What what good?
2:28:32>> Well, if they did, the the you know, the
2:28:34question would be why haven't they?
2:28:36because it would be so easy to do. So if
2:28:38they really did come from an insanely
2:28:40evolved, insanely advanced civilization,
2:28:43they have the ability to come here.
2:28:45>> They probably have the ability to do
2:28:46whatever they want.
2:28:47>> We probably wouldn't even know. We
2:28:48probably just all fall over dead, you
2:28:49know.
2:28:50>> Yeah. [laughter] If they wanted to just
2:28:51evaporate evaporate the planet, they
2:28:54probably could cuz we can.
2:28:55>> Yeah.
2:28:56>> You know, if we launched every nuclear
2:28:57bomb that we have right now currently,
2:28:59there would be no life left on Earth. So
2:29:01why, you know, it obviously it can do
2:29:04better than that if it can get here.
2:29:06>> I don't think we can kill all the
2:29:07microbes. I mean, there's always that,
2:29:08you know. I uh they'll start all over
2:29:09again.
2:29:10>> Yeah. Yeah. It is it is amazing how
2:29:11tenacious they are. I mean I mean that's
2:29:13a big deal about going you know
2:29:14exploring the solar system is is how how
2:29:16can you I mean we know we can't
2:29:17completely sterilize things.
2:29:19>> Well, we're finding fungi in Chernobyl.
2:29:22>> Oh yeah. Yeah.
2:29:23>> Well or I mean also also things that
2:29:25also things that can live on the outside
2:29:27of the space station. You bacterial and
2:29:28microbes and stuff. I mean to me I mean
2:29:31>> weird
2:29:32>> I don't what one of the most profound
2:29:34discoveries of the last uh say 10 years
2:29:36at NASA I mean this was even more recent
2:29:39than that um was a there was a mission
2:29:41called Osiris Rex and um I'm doing
2:29:44pretty well with my NASA acronyms today.
2:29:45Let's see if I can do this one. This is
2:29:47one of the bad ones. Osiris Rex um
2:29:49origin spectral interpretation resource
2:29:52identification security regalith
2:29:53explorer. There we go. And uh um it
2:29:57brought back a sample of an asteroid.
2:29:59And asteroids, as you know, are these
2:30:01rocks, you know, in space that that were
2:30:03never built into larger planets. And so
2:30:05there there's Osiris Rex. Thank you. And
2:30:09um Osiris Rex is a small spacecraft
2:30:11about the size of a car. And this is an
2:30:13illustration. It went to an asteroid
2:30:14called Bennu. And um Bennu is about half
2:30:17a kilometer across. It is a an asteroid
2:30:19that comes in and and intersects the
2:30:21orbit of Earth. We don't have any idea
2:30:24that it will ever impact us. It may hit
2:30:26Venus before it hits us. But at any
2:30:27rate, um we sent a probe out there to to
2:30:31bring back a real pristine sample of an
2:30:33asteroid because
2:30:34>> which is just nuts, by the way, that
2:30:37they could land on an asteroid and then
2:30:38return back to Earth.
2:30:39>> Do you have Do you know about this
2:30:41mission? Okay. So, so I mean the the
2:30:43asteroid is going faster than a speeding
2:30:44bullet. It doesn't have enough gravity
2:30:46to go into orbit around really until
2:30:47you're really close. We had to catch the
2:30:49thing, get ourselves situated around it,
2:30:52get low enough to get into orbit, match
2:30:54its spin rate to get the And then when
2:30:56they got out there, I love this. Um, you
2:31:00we designed NASA designed this little
2:31:01sort of vacuum cleaner to vacuum up a
2:31:03sample of the asteroid. The whole
2:31:05surface was covered with big boulders.
2:31:07They were just like I mean literally
2:31:08like it's like it's not going to
2:31:10work. We there's nowhere where there are
2:31:12small fine grain uh you know things we
2:31:15can just suck up easily. So they survey
2:31:18the whole thing. They find there are
2:31:19these tiny little craters that have some
2:31:22dust in them. And then they have to
2:31:24reprogram the the uh the spacecraft
2:31:26because it it it wasn't meant to be so
2:31:28autonomous. It's so far away that a
2:31:30command one way is going to take 15
2:31:32minutes. You can't joystick it. It's got
2:31:34to take itself down manually amidst all
2:31:37these boulders. They had to they had to
2:31:39make the spacecraft autonomous after
2:31:41they launched it. They got there. It
2:31:43wasn't going to work. They had to teach
2:31:45it how to recognize where it was, how to
2:31:47wave off if something was too dangerous.
2:31:49This shouldn't have happened. And so
2:31:51they finally vacuum up the sample. They
2:31:53get it back to Earth. You know, they
2:31:55drops on a parachute into the Utah test
2:31:57range. They open up the sample and all
2:32:02of the nucleases of our DNA, not just
2:32:05little molecules, the letters of our DNA
2:32:08and our RNA are in that sample.
2:32:11We don't think that's a coincidence,
2:32:13right? You know, the reason our biology
2:32:15is based on those molecules is that
2:32:17they're available. They're falling from
2:32:19the sky. That asteroid uh was full of
2:32:23water. At one time, the minerals were
2:32:25soaked in water. They were wet. So there
2:32:27there's there's the the asteroids were
2:32:29delivering water and and a little bomb
2:32:32of protolife. Not life yet, but but but
2:32:35the but the the genetic code, the
2:32:37letters of our genetic code were in that
2:32:39asteroid. and and not just our genetic
2:32:42code, but but there were nuclear bases
2:32:43we don't even use. Maybe life on other
2:32:45planet would use different nucleases,
2:32:47but we can already sample them from the
2:32:49asteroids.
2:32:50You know, the the idea that our biology
2:32:53was brought here from these these
2:32:55colder, more distant parts of the solar
2:32:57system, and it's literally raining down
2:32:59on us. You know, I I expected to find
2:33:01organic molecules. I expected to find
2:33:03amino acids, you know, the sort of the
2:33:05things that make up our proteins.
2:33:08I I was amazed. We found all of our
2:33:10nucleioases, all the letters of our
2:33:13genetic code, both for DNA and RNA.
2:33:15They're they're already there in the
2:33:17asteroid,
2:33:17>> which is nuts. The idea of panspermia
2:33:20and that this is how life got here in
2:33:24the first place.
2:33:24>> Well, yeah, absolutely. The building
2:33:26blocks just come down from space and
2:33:28they I mean, they hit everywhere
2:33:30>> from where?
2:33:31>> Well, that's a little bit less
2:33:33mysterious than you'd think. the the the
2:33:36universe is great at making large scale
2:33:39organic molecules. Um carbon is a sticky
2:33:41atom and you make um dying stars are
2:33:45great at making carbon. It's one of the
2:33:46most common things that comes out of a
2:33:48dying star and the electron structure of
2:33:51of carbon wants to grab on to other
2:33:53atoms. It it's literally the quantum
2:33:55mechanics. And so you have this
2:33:57naturally I mean this is building block
2:34:00of the carbon and dying stars are
2:34:03pumping out this stuff into the galaxy.
2:34:05You know they they gets collected by
2:34:07gravity into these clouds and then the
2:34:09carbon starts gloming onto each other.
2:34:11And so space itself is very good at
2:34:14making our our chemistry carbon- based
2:34:16organic chemistry. So then in the in the
2:34:20icier outer reaches of the solar system
2:34:22billions of years ago, you know that the
2:34:24planets are forming, but there are some
2:34:26smaller bits of ice and rock that never
2:34:28quite got built into the larger planets.
2:34:31They're they're still floating around
2:34:32out there and uh you know, and then they
2:34:35occasionally come in and and hit us and
2:34:37deliver water, deliver organics. You
2:34:40know, the the the Earth was once, you
2:34:42know, a pretty much a dry hot ball of
2:34:44lava after it formed. you know, all of
2:34:46the, you know, a lot of the lighter
2:34:48stuff probably arrived from collisions
2:34:50coming in later.
2:34:53>> Yeah. And I mean, the the engineering,
2:34:57the audacity of of reprogram this this
2:35:01this thing shouldn't have worked and
2:35:02they they saved it and they they made it
2:35:04work. this brilliant team of people, you
2:35:08know, I mean, it it just I mean, as as
2:35:11somebody who was a, you know, a minor
2:35:12manager at NASA, you know, and a minor
2:35:14scientist, I mean, ju just what what a
2:35:17team can accomplish. I mean, not just a
2:35:19single person, you know, one of the the
2:35:21the big things that I really respected
2:35:23at NASA was once you had your team of
2:35:25people, and like I said, nobody's
2:35:26perfect. Some people are higher
2:35:27functioning, some people don't
2:35:28contribute as much. But once you have
2:35:30your team identified, trying to make
2:35:32sure you get an input from everyone and
2:35:34they're not going to give it to you the
2:35:35same way. There are the people that are
2:35:37really assertive in meetings and they've
2:35:39got an idea immediately. They speak up
2:35:40and they give it to you. And then there
2:35:42are the quieter people that are going to
2:35:43take longer to process. They they're
2:35:46going to need a little more time. They
2:35:48don't like to be put on the spot. You
2:35:50know, trying to make sure you you get an
2:35:52input from everybody on your team. And
2:35:54sometimes the solutions come from the
2:35:55people that you might not have even
2:35:56asked. You know, the the that sort of
2:36:00respect for everyone on our team has
2:36:03something to contribute. You know, give
2:36:05me what you got. Even if you don't think
2:36:06it's good enough, even if you think it's
2:36:08a stupid idea, even if you think it, you
2:36:11know, give me what you got. The power of
2:36:14that I saw over and over at NASA. It's
2:36:16not just one type of mind, not just one
2:36:19person that's going to solve the
2:36:20problem.
2:36:21>> That's awesome. That is awesome. Thank
2:36:24you so much for being here. I really
2:36:25enjoyed this conversation. It was really
2:36:27great.
2:36:27>> I did too. It was a lot of fun.
2:36:28>> It was fantastic. And and thank you for
2:36:30everything that you put online. It's so
2:36:32valuable. It's so educational, so
2:36:34interesting. It's awesome.
2:36:36>> I'll try to do a little more and have
2:36:37some fun with it because uh I like I
2:36:39said, I'm retired now and uh I have a
2:36:41chance to be a little more creative with
2:36:42it. So, uh we'll see what I can do.
2:36:44>> You definitely should do something. A
2:36:46YouTube channel, something along those
2:36:47lines. Yeah, definitely a podcast,
2:36:49something.
2:36:50>> Do it.
2:36:51>> I will try.
2:36:51>> Please do. [laughter] Um, if people want
2:36:53to find you on social media. Do you have
2:36:55that?
2:36:56>> Well, yeah. I I mean, so I I um somebody
2:36:58had taken Michelle Fer. So, I go by Dr.
2:37:00Michelle Ther. Uh there's a Facebook
2:37:02page and an Instagram, and I do have a a
2:37:05small uh YouTube channel set up. I'll do
2:37:07more of that. I I just started uh doing
2:37:09Tik Tok. Um and uh so so I'm I'm I'm
2:37:12just getting started, but I'll I'll
2:37:13[music] try to put some stuff out.
2:37:14>> All right. Awesome. Thank you so much.
2:37:16Thank you. All right. Bye, everybody.
2:37:23>> [music]