Free YouTube Transcribe

Video transcript

Joe Rogan Experience #2506 - Michelle Thaller

PowerfulJRE · 31,720 words · 145 min read

Want to search this transcript, jump the video from any line, or download it as TXT, SRT, or VTT?

Open in the transcript tool

Full transcript

0:01Joe Rogan podcast. Check it out.

0:03>> The Joe Rogan Experience.

0:06>> TRAIN BY DAY. JOE ROGAN PODCAST BY

0:08NIGHT. All day.

0:12>> I like that.

0:14>> Absolutely.

0:15>> It's also there's [music] some things

0:16that are so awesome. It's like that's

0:18awesome. [laughter]

0:19>> I I was I was trying to talk about black

0:21holes to some high school students just

0:23seriously earlier this week and I was I

0:25kept saying, you know, what the f

0:27[laughter]

0:28Yeah. So, I I got nothing to pitch, but

0:31I I uh um I the Shorewood Men's Club, I

0:33was giving a talk there. The Shorewood,

0:35Wisconsin is where I live. The men's

0:37club invited me to give a talk about

0:38astronomy last week, and when I

0:39mentioned I was coming to the show, they

0:41just freaked out. And so, the only thing

0:43I have is my Shorewood Men's Club uh uh

0:46uh water.

0:46>> Well, shout out to the Shorewood Men's

0:48[laughter] Club. That's awesome. [gasps]

0:50That's so cool that you give those

0:51speeches. I love your YouTube talks.

0:54They are fantastic.

0:55>> Oh, thank you. Wow. I have watched

0:59probably every one you've ever done.

1:01I've I've watched at least I mean how

1:02many have you done? I've done I've

1:04watched at least like 10 of them.

1:06>> Yeah. I mean, so I mean pretty much what

1:08I did at at NASA I did a lot of sort of

1:10the science spokesperson stuff and so so

1:13most of that was you know I I'm more on

1:15the NASA videos. I hosted like launch

1:17events. I haven't done much privately on

1:20YouTube. I'm I'm I'm thinking about

1:22starting some stuff. Oh,

1:23>> you should. I I'll Yeah, I'll work on

1:25that. Okay.

1:26>> 100%. [laughter]

1:27>> Thank you.

1:27>> 100%. You said so many things that made

1:29me just go, "What?"

1:31>> Ah,

1:32>> like here's a big one that you said. You

1:33were talking about if the size of Earth,

1:37if the Earth was the dot of an eye in a

1:39book in regular print.

1:41>> Yes.

1:42>> That the Milky Way galaxy would be as

1:45large as the Earth itself.

1:47>> Actually, a little bigger. Yeah. So, I

1:49mean, the thing is this is an

1:50interesting thing about science

1:51communication.

1:53>> [snorts]

1:53>> You say that if if the if the sun were

1:55the size of a dot of an eye and you got

1:57to remember you can fit a million earths

1:59inside the sun, right? This is a huge

2:00thing. So if that's the size of a dot of

2:02an eye on text, then the galaxy would be

2:05the size of the earth. That's when

2:06people's eyes get big and people respond

2:08to it.

2:08>> So it's not just the earth, it's the the

2:10sun. So if the sun was the dot of an

2:11eye.

2:12>> Yes, that's right. So let's let's make

2:13this clear. So the sun were the size of

2:15the dot of an eye on a page of text. So

2:17you could fit a million earths inside

2:19that dot of an eye, then the Milky Way

2:21galaxy would be bigger than the Earth.

2:24>> Yeah. I think

2:26>> So if the Earth was the dot of an eye,

2:28[laughter] then how big is the Milky Way

2:29galaxy? Cuz the sun is how many millions

2:32Earths

2:32>> volume wise, you could fit over a

2:34million Earths inside the sun. Yeah.

2:36Yeah. The the sun is about 800,000 miles

2:38across. You could fit about 110 Earths

2:40across it. The diameter. We do those

2:43things where you show the the

2:44differences between our sun and

2:46different stars and immense stars and

2:49you go bigger and bigger and bigger and

2:51you you get to the point where you're

2:52like I can't my this is not working. I

2:55can't get I can't process this. It's too

2:57kooky.

2:57>> There there's nobody that can process

2:59it. I mean I mean one one of the the the

3:01really kind of you know the thing about

3:02sort of demystifying scientists is the

3:04idea that our brains somehow work any

3:06differently and like we can visualize

3:09what a lightyear is, right? you know, a

3:10lightyear is about six trillion miles.

3:13That, you know, the distance light

3:14travels in a year. No, we're human

3:15beings. We we get used to using the

3:18terms. We get used to, you know, using

3:20the numbers, but but we've got the same

3:22brain as everybody else. Nobody can

3:24visualize what a galaxy really is. And

3:27you can take pictures of them. You can

3:29say the word galaxy, but people have no

3:32idea what what monsters these are. and

3:35and and then with like with the James

3:36Webb Space Telescope, you know, all of a

3:38sudden you're taking pictures of

3:39billions of them and you know, they're

3:43right in front of your eyes. This is not

3:45something that you can argue about. It's

3:47an image and and you see these these

3:50foggy hazes of of of stars, you know,

3:53basically so many stars you can't see

3:54them individually. And that's real. And

3:57and I mean, it still gives me

3:59goosebumps.

4:00>> That's awesome. [laughter]

4:02It gives me goosebumps, too. But it's so

4:04cool that it gives it to you and you

4:06actually study it your whole life.

4:07>> Oh, that's that's that's the whole

4:09point. I I mean, you know, working for

4:10NASA was a huge huge honor. And I mean,

4:13all of us there are doing this. I mean,

4:15we were all science fiction fans. We all

4:17love imagination. Um, you know, we

4:22that was the best thing about working at

4:24NASA was was the joy and and and the the

4:26teamwork and the camaraderie and the

4:28people that you're working with that uh

4:29you know, they they think this is the

4:30best thing in the world to do. Well, I

4:32mean, there's a a real problem that we

4:35have where I think that cities and light

4:38pollution have really for, you know,

4:42it's great that we have cities. It's

4:43wonderful. It's wonderful that we have

4:44all this electricity and that we can see

4:46things at night time, but boy, we have

4:48done ourselves a massive disservice by

4:49not being able to see the stars all the

4:51time. And I think people have kind of

4:53lost the wonder of it when you're only

4:54looking at it as images on your phone or

4:57when, you know, the only time you get it

4:59is on vacation. Occasionally, you look

5:00up in the sky. Wow, look at all the

5:02stars here. It's different here. This is

5:05something that everyone should be

5:08absolutely blown away by. At night, you

5:11have a vision of the most spectacular

5:13thing any human being has ever seen

5:15ever. Just the Milky Way galaxy alone.

5:17It's nuts. It's crazy to think that

5:20those are all stars and that you can't

5:23count them. It's insane. There's so many

5:25of them and it's above you every day.

5:27And we're just blas blas. We're just

5:29like so used to it. We're so dismissive

5:32of it. So it doesn't mean anything. It

5:33It's exciting when someone's excited by

5:36it because I'm like more people need to

5:38get the away from the cities and

5:39just go see how crazy this is that we

5:42are flying through space.

5:45>> Yeah, [laughter]

5:46it is profound. And to be that close, I

5:48mean just looking up, you don't even

5:50need a telescope or a pair of

5:51binoculars. The presence of something so

5:54much larger than you. But I mean, if

5:56you've if you've listened to some of my

5:57my podcasts, and I think you you know

5:59that the big deal for me is that you are

6:02such a part of this. You are such an

6:05intimate, intrinsic part of this. It's

6:07not we're separate from space. You know,

6:09we look up and there's something

6:10separate from us. You know, that's the

6:12story of us up there. you know, the the

6:14only way the universe makes atoms, the

6:17only way that makes, you know, the

6:18chemicals all around us, you know, the

6:20the aluminum, the iron, the oxygen, the

6:22carbon, you know, the phosphorus,

6:24everything that makes me up, you know,

6:25the only thing in the universe that

6:26makes atoms is the interior of a star.

6:29It's the only place where nuclear fusion

6:31puts atoms together. So, so everything

6:34that you are, the the story is up there.

6:37And, you know, so you're you're not

6:38looking at something separate and

6:40distant, you know. I mean astrophysics

6:42is the story of you know the end of your

6:44nose literally I mean I mean we are part

6:47of this beautiful bigger thing

6:49>> that's a weird concept the I mean that's

6:52from that old song you know we are

6:53stardust

6:54>> yeah we're golden to get ourselves back

6:58yeah um that that's real that's what we

7:00are and that's what all life is and that

7:02that's just a very strange thing for

7:04people to wrap their heads around as

7:06we're sort of slowly getting a greater

7:09and greater understanding of the

7:11complexity of the universe itself which

7:13is relatively recent in terms of h human

7:16history. I mean we really didn't know

7:19all all what we just we know now because

7:22the James Webb telescope is so crazy

7:25where they're seeing these new these

7:26galaxies they're confusing like why are

7:28they formed so early.

7:29>> Oh yeah. Oh I I I gave a talk about

7:31those just a few weeks ago. The the red

7:33dots. Yes. And they never let

7:34astronomers name anything. Right. You're

7:36seeing something so dramatic and they

7:37call it the little red dots, right? you

7:39know, or you know, there's a storm on

7:40Jupiter that's three times the size of

7:42the Earth with 400 mph winds, and they

7:44call it, you know, the red spot.

7:45>> How come no one's allowed to name them?

7:47>> Well, naming conventions, uh, well,

7:49they're they're complex. So, so if you

7:51if you discover a comet, you get to know

7:53if you discover an asteroid, you get to

7:55name it. If you discover a comet, the

7:57comet is named after you. But anything

7:59else has to be done by international

8:00committee. And so, you know, they they

8:03because of that, things don't end up

8:04with very interesting names. They all

8:05end up with, you know, catalog numbers,

8:07you you know, basically phone numbers.

8:09>> What do they call that weird hexagon on

8:11Jupiter? Is it a hexagon?

8:12>> Saturn. Hexagon. I think they call that,

8:15you know, the hexagon on Saturn. They

8:17don't even they don't really the

8:18hexagonal storm. It's fantastic. Uh you

8:21could fit about two Earths across that.

8:23And it it it's a it's a hex it's a

8:25hexagon jetream basically. You've got

8:28super fast moving winds around the pole

8:30of Saturn. and and Saturn is so cold,

8:33the gas is so cold that there's almost

8:35no friction in the gas. So unlike here,

8:38you know, the jetream here, there's kind

8:40of this joke. Oh, there's a picture.

8:42Hey, that's fantastic. Um,

8:44>> that's wild.

8:45>> One of my favorite pictures NASA ever

8:47took. If you look at the little dot in

8:49the middle of that, the sort of little

8:50eye of the storm. We actually have a

8:52picture from Cassini where you can see

8:54the sun glinting off of hundreds of mile

8:58high. There you go. It's down in the

8:59bottom there. It's in the bottom in the

9:00middle. Yeah, that picture. One more

9:03over. Yeah, that that that's a picture

9:04uh from the Cassini space mission.

9:06That's a real image.

9:07>> Wow.

9:07>> And that's the eye of that storm. And

9:10and those are, like I said, hundreds of

9:12miles high banks of clouds catching the

9:14sunlight and the poles of Saturn. And

9:16you know, we did that. We we went there.

9:19We flew over that storm.

9:20>> That's crazy. And uh uh and and yeah, I

9:22mean as amazing as the storm is, it's um

9:25it's at least fairly well understood as

9:28a very low temperature jetream. You

9:29know, I mean, you may be familiar here.

9:31People kind of joke about like, you

9:32know, the weather's the same. A week

9:33from now, the weather will be about the

9:34same as it is now. There patterns that

9:36get set up in in the jetream of the

9:37Earth and you you take away all the heat

9:39and all the friction and it forms this

9:41this beautiful storm.

9:43>> What why what is the theories why it

9:45forms a hexagon?

9:46>> It's it's something called a standing

9:48wave. the the the the the jetream

9:50basically sets up a wave inside this

9:52circulation and and I'm I I will admit

9:54I'm not an atmospheric specialist, but

9:56that that's what I know. And and and

9:58that wave kind of kind of makes this

9:59hexagonal shape and and then you cool

10:02everything down without friction and

10:03that's how the whole thing works. They

10:05they have done computer simulations of

10:08very fastm moving jet streams under the

10:10conditions of Saturn and you can get

10:11this sort of shape to set up.

10:13>> Wow.

10:14>> God, it's so fascinating. And it's so

10:16fascinating that we think of that as

10:18being so far away.

10:19>> That's just right in our neighborhood.

10:20>> It's just right there. It's super hard

10:23to get to. Takes a [laughter] long time,

10:25but it's just right there.

10:26>> Well, we're hoping to launch, when I say

10:28we, NASA's hoping to launch a new

10:30mission to one of the moons of Saturn.

10:32Uh hopefully in in like 2028. It'll take

10:34it something like, you know, six, seven

10:36years to get out to Saturn. But there's

10:37a there's that giant moon of Saturn,

10:39Titan, which has a thick atmosphere.

10:41It's the only place where the air

10:42pressure the air pressure is actually

10:44even a little bit greater than the room

10:45here. And uh um it's it's very cold. You

10:49know, it's it's you know almost close to

10:50300 degrees below zero, but it's got

10:52this thick atmosphere and tons of

10:53organic molecules and evidence of liquid

10:55water below the surface. It's one of the

10:57places that that might be friendly for

10:59life. And so they're they're designing,

11:00have you heard about this? It's called

11:01Dragonfly. It's a it's an octacopter.

11:03It's a big drone. There you go. Perfect.

11:06And so so so Dragonfly is going to be

11:09this big opticopter that we're going to

11:11land on this moon Titan. We've already

11:12landed on this moon once with the

11:14Cassini mission. And it's got this this

11:16really kick-ass uh chemical uh

11:19laboratory inside to look for the

11:21conditions for life, you know, anything,

11:23you know, that we might be able to find

11:24and and obviously sample more than one

11:26site. You actually fly around and and go

11:28to different places. There's rain, there

11:30are oceans, there are rivers. The only

11:31place we know there are open, you know,

11:33great lakesized lakes on Titan.

11:35>> Wow. Wow.

11:35>> But it's so cold that it's not uh liquid

11:38water. It's actually liquid natural gas.

11:39Liquid methane and ethane. Yeah. [sighs]

11:42Yeah. And again, you know, the the

11:45we we've already landed there. We

11:47actually sent a probe there as part of

11:48the Cassini mission to land on Titan. I

11:50mean, it's just badass that you know

11:53that that we humans have been there.

11:55That that's a that's an artist

11:56conception, but that's what it would

11:57look like. You know, we we sent a probe

11:59there. You know, it took a bunch of

12:00readings and then and eventually froze

12:02to death. But uh but but some of the

12:04readings that it took were intriguing

12:07about the possibility of life on Titan.

12:09>> Didn't the Russians land something on

12:11Venus?

12:12>> Yeah. Well, more than once. Yeah.

12:13They're the the Soviet Union is the only

12:15nation you former Soviet Union now that

12:17ever landed on Venus. And landing on

12:20Venus is way hard. [laughter]

12:22>> They [clears throat] got crazy pictures,

12:23too.

12:23>> The surface temperature is about a

12:24thousand degrees and the air pressure is

12:27similar to being about a mile below the

12:29ocean.

12:30>> That's a photo.

12:30>> Yeah, it's a photo. Yep. That's real.

12:32And it's a photo taken in a thousand

12:34degree temperature.

12:35>> Yes. [laughter] Didn't last long. But uh

12:38um everything is crushed flat. I mean

12:41the the landscape is just crushed flat

12:43by that you know huge pressure. Uh you

12:46know this incredible dense atmosphere.

12:48The clouds are sulfuric acid. That's why

12:50it looks yellow. That's real. Uh you

12:52know sulfuric acid clouds. I mean it is

12:53like you know classic vision of hell. It

12:56it's it's it's heavy and deep and uh and

12:59dense and sulfuric acid. What's so

13:02interesting too that our understanding

13:04of planets in terms of like just what's

13:06in our solar system, they're all

13:08different. They vary so much and this is

13:10just all we know about the known

13:12universe in terms of planets. Is it

13:14possible that there could be some

13:15planets out there that are set up

13:17completely different than the planets in

13:19our solar system?

13:20>> Oh, absolutely. Um, one of my favorite

13:22websites, just for fun, I mean, so the

13:24um, it changes every day how many

13:26planets around other stars we know

13:27about, we call them exoplanets, exterior

13:29planets. Um, I think we're up to about

13:335,000 that we know of.

13:34>> When did we start noticing them?

13:36>> Um, so this was at least detecting them.

13:38>> Yeah. Yeah. This is something I was been

13:40involved with ever since I was in

13:41college. When when I was in college, my

13:44uh my research adviser was a man named

13:45David Leam and he was trying to to find

13:48the first evidence. I mean, we we

13:49figured other stars have planets. I

13:51mean, it can't be just us, but but

13:53they're hard to see. They're tiny.

13:55They're dark. I mean, compared to a

13:57star, right? Right? I mean, planets

13:58don't glow themselves, right? So, they

14:00just reflect starlight. I mean, we we

14:02literally said it was like trying to see

14:04a firefly around a search light from 200

14:06miles away, right? How would you do it?

14:08And uh I mean, now we're actually

14:10getting so good at it, we find more

14:12every every week, almost every day. I

14:14mean, pretty soon it's going to be I I

14:16think thousands of new planets every

14:17single year. And um and

14:20>> do you have actual images? So, for the

14:22most part, we don't have images, but

14:24that doesn't mean we don't have really

14:25cool uh uh observations, including the

14:28chemistry of their atmospheres. This is

14:30really amazing to me. So, they're so

14:32tiny, it's hard to actually get a pixel.

14:34They're smaller than a pixel. But when

14:36these things pass in front of their

14:37star, right? So, there's a star and they

14:39they they pass in front of it. So,

14:41you're looking at this thing pass in

14:43front of the star, it makes a tiny

14:44little solar eclipse. It goes by, it

14:45blocks a little bit of the star light.

14:47And we find them that way. We find the

14:49stars twinkling as little planets go

14:51around them again and again. They have

14:53to come back three times for us to say

14:54it's a planet. Otherwise, it could be a

14:56spot on the star or something else. And

14:59um the the amazing thing is that the

15:02starlight will shine through the

15:03atmosphere of that planet and we can

15:05actually we can actually probe the

15:07chemistry of the atmosphere. So we find

15:09planets that have you know they're the

15:11size of the earth about the temperature

15:12of the earth. They have evidence of

15:14water vapor, carbon dioxide, oxygen. And

15:17then uh last year there was this

15:19fantastic controversial discovery. I

15:21mean it's it's very real. We need to

15:23follow it up. Um we think we're starting

15:25to see the evidence of organic

15:26molecules. It's it's it's it's not, you

15:28know, a very strong signal yet. And this

15:31this this was this was a press release

15:32from the James Webb Space Telescope. And

15:35there were some scientists that wondered

15:37if these could be organic molecules that

15:40that that might someday be traceable

15:41even to the presence of life. they they

15:43they resembled something that plankton

15:45might might give off on an ocean world.

15:48And then of course I the rest of the

15:49scientists said the data is not good

15:51enough yet. We need much better

15:53observations before you can say that.

15:55You know, we could maybe believe it's an

15:56organic carbon-based molecule, but we

15:58don't know which one it is yet. So, you

16:00know, I mean, stay tuned. I mean, I

16:02would never have thought the first

16:04evidence of life outside the Earth, like

16:07a really hard chemical scientific

16:09evidence, would be on a planet around

16:10another star. I thought we maybe find on

16:12Mars or on some of the moons of Jupiter

16:14and Saturn. But now with the James Webb

16:16Space Telescope and the telescopes that

16:17will come afterwards, we might be able

16:20to actually, you know, get get enough of

16:22a sense of the atmosphere of these

16:23planets to start looking for life

16:25science. Yeah.

16:26>> So the sun, the star is passing light

16:30through this little tiny thing that's

16:32smaller than a pixel and through the

16:34atmosphere where the light passes

16:36through. What are we using to detect

16:38that? It's a technique called

16:39spectroscopy and it's a really really

16:42powerful thing. I This is what most

16:43scientists do. As as beautiful as images

16:46are of a gorgeous galaxy or a star.

16:51That's not really what we do. We look at

16:52these little squiggly lines. We get very

16:54excited. We we let the light from the

16:57star pass through um a grading that that

16:59actually draws it into a rainbow. You

17:01take takes that white light. You've seen

17:02pictures of like prism, you know, dark

17:04side of the moon, Pink Floyd. You know,

17:06white light goes in, rainbow comes out.

17:08If you measure really really carefully

17:10how much light is coming in every color,

17:13you can tell astounding things. You you

17:15can tell how hot the star is, how fast

17:17it's rotating, uh in some cases, how far

17:20away a galaxy is. That's how we measure

17:22how far away they are from us in space.

17:24And you can measure the chemistry

17:26molecule by molecule. You can tell

17:28exactly what atoms and molecules are in

17:30that object. Here we go. Look at that.

17:33So what you're amazing person by the way

17:36that that's incredible. Thank you so

17:38much. Um [laughter]

17:40>> every every every element carbon,

17:42nitrogen, oxygen has a fingerprint in

17:45the rainbow and it's like you know it's

17:47that there's nothing else like it. You

17:49know that you see carbon and nitrogen if

17:51you see these colors of the rainbow

17:52shining at that particular light. And

17:55it's not just simple things like carbon,

17:57nitrogen, oxygen, but it's it's water

17:58vapor, carbon dioxide, um organic

18:01molecules. Everybody has their

18:02fingerprint in the rainbow. And so when

18:05when the starlight shines through the

18:07atmosphere, there you go. That's how we

18:09tell what these things are made of. You

18:10know, this is a dying star. This is

18:12actually in the Karina Nebula. And uh

18:14the most the one of the most luminous

18:16stars there is. And we we pass the light

18:18through a rainbow. And then looking

18:20really really carefully at how much

18:22light comes at every color, you can pick

18:23apart exactly what it's made of.

18:26>> Wow.

18:26>> Yeah. Did Did you know that you know

18:28helium you know the element helium,

18:29right? You you may be familiar that the

18:31the Greek the Greek sun god's name is

18:33helios. Helium is an element we

18:35discovered on the sun before we ever

18:37knew it was here in in in the the turn

18:39of the last century in the late 1800s

18:41when they were passing sunlight through

18:42a prism and they were looking at all

18:44these patterns of light. There was one

18:46chemical that we'd never seen before

18:47here. And so they named it after the

18:49sun, helium. It was on the sun but not

18:51here. We we never knew the helium was

18:53here. That was found later. It was later

18:55we found it, you know, in like, you

18:56know, a natural gas, you know,

18:58radioactive decay. Helium is such a

19:00light gas. It just leaves the Earth. It

19:01just doesn't stick around. And so, you

19:03know, helium, we saw this this pattern

19:05of colors in the sun's light. We were

19:07like, what what the hell is that? And it

19:09turned out to be a new element we'd

19:10never found before.

19:11>> What year was that?

19:12>> We should look this up. I don't know

19:14exactly, but if we Google what year was

19:16helium found, um, I'm sure we can find

19:18[laughter] it. Well, I mean, I've been

19:20thinking about helium balloons and

19:22people who, you know, suck helium, make

19:24their voice go really high.

19:25>> We didn't even know about helium until

19:27>> 1868. There we go.

19:29>> That's nuts. So, they figured out that

19:32there was helium in the sun in 1868.

19:36>> Long before we ever identified it on

19:37this planet.

19:39>> That is so nuts.

19:41>> Yeah. Just think what's out there. We

19:43didn't even know about helium. It's not

19:45just that it's what's out there, but

19:46that there's people out there that can

19:48figure out how to do that. In 1868,

19:51shout out to Pierre Jeansen,

19:54uh, a French astronomer who figured it

19:57out.

19:58>> When you when you think about, you know,

20:00I know that one thing you you you love

20:01is the idea of uh, you know, Einstein

20:03and time being different and all that.

20:06>> You know, they figured all of this out

20:08around like like 1908. It was more than

20:10a hundred years ago. And you know, we

20:12don't really even have a better thing

20:14yet. You know, I mean, they they they

20:16figured out that time isn't the way that

20:18we experience it just by really simple,

20:22brilliant thought processes,

20:24observations and some years ago, 100 a

20:26little more than 120 years ago. Yeah.

20:28Incredible.

20:30>> The idea that the faster you go, the

20:32slower time is is so hard to wrap one's

20:36head around. And one of the things that

20:38I heard you talking about, you were

20:39talking about GPS satellites

20:41>> and you were saying that GPS satellites

20:43because they're going about what are

20:44they going like 20,000 miles an hour or

20:46something like that. So actually if we

20:48want to break this down a little bit

20:49there there are a couple different

20:50effects about time and and one of the

20:53things that that you know NASA does is

20:55we you know calibrates the GPS

20:57satellites and the signal coming and and

20:58you wouldn't I mean I think I heard that

21:00I mean within within a day if we didn't

21:03take into account the time difference

21:05these things are in that we we'd be

21:07about six miles off I mean in a in a

21:09single day.

21:09>> That's crazy.

21:10>> Oh yeah it's it's a big deal.

21:11>> That's so crazy.

21:13>> Yeah.

21:14>> That's so crazy. And that's just above

21:17us.

21:18>> Time really is something. I mean, this

21:20this is not a theory. Time time is is is

21:23variable depending on how fast you're

21:24going and also how far off the Earth's

21:26surface you are or how I should say how

21:27far away from a big gravity body you

21:29are. In the case of the GPS satellites,

21:31there's there's there's two things going

21:33on. And it's it's it's kind of fun

21:35because it's actually the reverse for

21:36the astronauts. So, let's want to break

21:38this down. This is really fun. Okay.

21:42We have clocks that are so accurate that

21:44if you move about two feet above where

21:47you if we had a clock on this desk and

21:49then if we moved it up about two feet,

21:51we could actually detect time flowing

21:53differently because you're just that far

21:55away from the Earth's gravity. Just two

21:57feet. Your head and the and your feet,

22:01we spend most of our lives say standing

22:03up are actually going through time at

22:05slightly different rates. If the farther

22:07away you are from a gravitational

22:09source, I mean you you probably like

22:10movies like Interstellar, right? With

22:12with you know Matthew McConna,

22:13>> remember the big black hole? And the

22:15closer they get to the big black hole,

22:17the slower time goes.

22:18>> That's not a theory. That's something we

22:20can actually measure with clocks. And a

22:22black hole has so much gravity it does

22:24it a lot more dramatically. But it's

22:26happening right in this room. Seriously,

22:28your head is in a different time frame

22:30than your feet right now.

22:31>> That's nuts.

22:32>> Yeah. And you and I mean it's

22:33measurable. you you you need extremely

22:36accurate clocks. But in the case of the

22:39GPS satellites, the GPS satellites are

22:41in what we call a medium orbit. They're

22:42not as far away as the geostationary

22:44satellites, but they're they're not

22:46actually going that fast. They're only

22:48going about 9,000 m an hour around the

22:50Earth. The the astronauts in the space

22:52station, by the way, are going much

22:53faster. They're they're going more like

22:55let's say approximately 20,000 mph. So,

22:57the GPS satellites are going a little

22:59slower and and Yeah. Okay. 8,000 m an

23:01hour is is a lot. And that does slow

23:03your time down, but the bigger effect

23:05for GPS satellites is how far away from

23:07the Earth they are.

23:09>> Wow.

23:09>> We're actually going slower in time than

23:11they are because we're closer to the

23:13Earth's gravity. And they're so far

23:15away, they're actually going a little

23:16faster than we are in time. Now, they're

23:19also slowed down by their fast velocity.

23:22The the faster you go, the slower your

23:24time goes. But people don't realize

23:26there's another factor and that's how

23:28far away you are from gravity. For the

23:30astronauts, the astronauts are closer to

23:32the Earth, right? So they're actually

23:33not so far away as the satellites and

23:35they're going much faster. So for the

23:37astronauts, it's the it's the motion.

23:38It's the time dilation from the motion

23:40that's a bigger effect. Uh if you are on

23:42the space station for a year, you come

23:44back about 1/100th of a second younger

23:46than you should be. [laughter]

23:47And uh you know, obviously that's not a

23:49big deal, but it's easily measurable.

23:51>> Wow.

23:52>> And in the case of the satellites, you

23:54wouldn't get the right location. The

23:55data wouldn't be right unless we take

23:56into account two things. How fast

23:58they're going. The closer to the speed

24:00of light you go, the slower time goes.

24:02But also how far away from the

24:04gravitational pull of the Earth they

24:05are. The the closer you are into

24:07gravity, the slower time goes.

24:09>> I think the weirdest thing that I've

24:10ever heard anybody say is that all time

24:12exists currently.

24:15>> That's Einstein. I mean, that goes back

24:17that goes back 120 years.

24:19>> That's such a bizarre thought. We don't

24:22know if it's true but but it's I mean

24:24Einstein really thought there wasn't

24:26much of a way around it because he said

24:28okay well if everything is going at

24:30different velocities compared to

24:31everything else right I mean it's a

24:33great question a kid can ask how fast am

24:35I going through space you know and the

24:38earth you if you're on the equator of

24:40the earth that goes around at about uh u

24:42you know about about 1 th000 miles an

24:44hour you know and then you know we go we

24:46go around the sun at about 67,000 miles

24:48an hour in our orbit the sun's going

24:50around a galaxy about half a million

24:52miles an hour around the galaxy. The

24:55galaxy is going towards a galactic

24:56cluster at more than a million miles an

24:58hour.

25:00But you know how fast are we going

25:02really? And the the only thing you can

25:05measure is how fast are you going

25:06relative to something else? There's no

25:08answer.

25:10You know, how fast am I going? Well, I

25:12mean, am I still or am I actually

25:13traveling close to the speed of light

25:14right now? I don't know. So, so Einstein

25:17said the only way he could really think

25:18about how that would work is if the

25:20universe was just one big thing. You

25:23know, all of time and space exists in a

25:25big whole thing. There's only one now.

25:29Einstein famously said, "The past,

25:31present, and future are, you know,

25:33persistently annoying illusions."

25:36Now, again, do we know this to be true?

25:40At the moment, we don't have any better

25:41physics. And and I doubt the physics

25:43will get any less weird than that.

25:46But yeah, I mean I mean that's sort of

25:49the way modern physics thinks the

25:50universe may be is is a big whole thing

25:54that started from beginning to end and

25:56is all nowish.

25:58>> But if that's the case, so subjectively

26:01we can measure

26:04things. We can measure time but but what

26:08are we measuring

26:10if it's I mean are are we

26:12[clears throat] making artificial time

26:14constraints? Are we are we doing it

26:15oursel? When we're when we create a

26:17clock, we create a watch

26:19>> and the watch is, you know, 24 hours a

26:21day it's running. What is it what is it

26:24measuring?

26:25>> Yeah.

26:26>> Right.

26:27>> That is exactly the question Albert

26:29Einstein asked. That that is that is a

26:31deep excellent question.

26:34And and so that was the problem. I mean

26:36in a famous thought experiment, Einstein

26:38made a clock by setting up two mirrors

26:40and having light bounce between the two

26:41mirrors. And that was the tick of the

26:43clock. Tick tick tick tick tick. And and

26:46the problem was that, you know, that's

26:47how he started thinking about the speed

26:49of light is that if you had this thing

26:50in a spaceship that was going a huge

26:51fraction of the speed of light, then a

26:53person standing watching it go by would

26:55actually watch the light kind of trace

26:57out a pattern like this because you it's

26:59it's it's actually ticking between the

27:00mirrors, but the mirrors are moving

27:01along. And so you see the light make

27:03this sort of bouncy movement. And that

27:05means it's actually traveled farther

27:08than the person on the ground who thinks

27:09that the mirrors are just sort of the

27:11the light is making just a straight up

27:12and down line from mirror to mirror.

27:14That that question that you asked is

27:16what completely

27:18I mean it completely revolutionized

27:20physics. Everything fell apart when

27:22people said, "How do you even measure

27:24time? What does it mean to make a clock?

27:27What are we measuring?"

27:29>> I still don't understand what we're

27:30measuring.

27:31>> Oh lord. [laughter] Yeah.

27:32>> I I get it. I mean we I don't know if I

27:35have an answer for you. I don't think

27:36anybody does. But but but here's the

27:38deal. So the the clock in Einstein's

27:42experiment, so the the clock has, you

27:45know, two mirrors and there's light

27:46bouncing between it and then that's the

27:48distance that it travels in one tick,

27:49>> right?

27:51But now you put this mirror, you put

27:52that clock on a spaceship and the

27:54spaceship's going really fast. And as it

27:56goes by, you see that that that clock as

27:58as it streams by you really fast, you

28:00see the light make this motion.

28:02And and this line is actually longer

28:05than that line. This this line if you

28:07measure it, that's actually a longer

28:09line that I drew than the the original

28:11one between just the two mirrors because

28:12now it's at an angle.

28:14And this is what made Einstein say time

28:17has to change. If anything moves, the

28:20tick of a clock changes. What? However

28:22you measure time, whatever time is,

28:24whether you measure it with a bouncing

28:26clock or whether you measure it with a

28:27vibrating atom like we do in the Bureau

28:29of Standards, or whether you measure

28:31with a spring that's slowly unwinding in

28:33a wristwatch.

28:36Anything you can do to measure one

28:38moment to the next changes when motion

28:40is involved. There's no way to get

28:42around it. It's not just the

28:44measurement. It's time itself is

28:47changing. any way we have to measure

28:49this thing we call time. And I have to

28:52tell you, Joe, I I don't think we have

28:54an answer to what time is. What are we

28:57measuring?

29:00I think I think right there, I think

29:02you're asking for the next revolution in

29:04physics that we don't have yet. I really

29:06mean that. So when we're measuring time

29:08currently, like when I w look down on my

29:10watch, I'm measuring time in this

29:14particular space, like where I am, what

29:17altitude I'm at, how fast I'm moving,

29:21>> and the watch just does a reasonable job

29:23of calculating all that.

29:25>> And that's and that's you. I mean,

29:26that's what you see here, sitting still

29:28with your watch looking at it.

29:29>> If someone's flying by at close to the

29:31speed of light,

29:32>> they won't see you measure time the same

29:34way. Yeah. But you said something else

29:36too that freaked me out that [laughter]

29:39that if you traveled at the speed of

29:41light, the the problem would be you

29:43would have infinite mass.

29:46>> Well, anything with mass. Yeah. Yeah.

29:48That's the thing.

29:48>> So, if a person was in a spaceship and

29:51it traveled the speed of light, that

29:52spaceship would have infinite mass.

29:55>> It's basically it's what makes

29:57accelerating up to the speed of light

29:58impossible. That anything with mass

30:01can't travel at the speed of light. I

30:03mean the the equations blow up. But what

30:04does infinite mass mean? Do you have

30:06more mass than the whole universe? What

30:07the hell is that? As you approach the

30:10speed of light, if you have mass, it

30:12takes more and more energy to accelerate

30:14you even just a little bit more. So you

30:15never get to the speed of light. You

30:17know, you're speed you're going 99.9%

30:19the speed of light. Okay, I want to go a

30:21little faster. It it takes more and more

30:23energy each little tiny step you make.

30:25So it's it basically you never get to

30:27the speed of light. It it takes an

30:28infinite amount of energy.

30:30So, you know, when it comes to things

30:32like interstellar travel, I I I don't

30:35think we're ever going to take a

30:36spaceship and accelerate it to the speed

30:38of light, I I I mean, I we might get

30:41very close. There are particles in space

30:43that do have mass, like nutrinos, tiny

30:45little bits of mass. They travel very

30:46close to the speed of light, but they

30:47don't travel at the speed of light.

30:50But to me, you know, I I think that the

30:53the the idea of traveling interstellar

30:56distances or even intergalactic

30:57distances, you know, the thing that

30:59starts to really get me is the question

31:00of this this what is space and what is

31:02time at all? Quantum entanglement,

31:04>> right? Glad you brought that up.

31:05>> Oh, yeah.

31:07Uh I I [laughter]

31:09I'm going to say I I hope your listeners

31:11I I I I don't want to get I don't want

31:12to I I want people to come along with

31:14us.

31:14>> Oh, they're coming along.

31:16>> Yeah. I I don't want to say things that

31:17sound so stupid. They're like, you know,

31:18why are they saying this? So, please

31:20stop me if we need some more background.

31:21>> This does not sound stupid in any way,

31:23shape, or form,

31:24>> but the idea of quantum entanglement, we

31:26should explain that to people.

31:28>> Yeah.

31:28>> And what it essentially means is that

31:31things are entangled, they're connected

31:33at regardless of the distance.

31:35>> Yes.

31:35>> And it could be an immeasurable amount

31:38of distance like

31:39>> any distance

31:39>> like

31:40>> Yeah. Literally the beginning of the

31:43universe distance like 13.8 8 billion

31:46life years away distance.

31:48>> You're entangled with that.

31:50>> It's amazing because once again, let's

31:52go back to the idea that this this is a

31:54real experimental fact, right? I mean, a

31:57lot of times this this crazy stuff that,

31:59you know, scientists will will say this

32:01stuff and and people hear it, you know,

32:03for the first time and they say, "Well,

32:04that that sounds like idiotic. That

32:05sounds stupid. Why where did they get

32:07that from?" And the the idea that time

32:12changes is now it's one of the most

32:15commonly proven facts every day. Like I

32:17said, we needed to calibrate the GPS

32:18satellites. It's easy to measure.

32:21Quantum entanglement was something that

32:23that even Albert Einstein 100 years ago

32:26um he understood that quantum mechanics

32:28was pointing that way, but he really

32:29didn't like it. He called it he called

32:31it spooky action at a distance. He hated

32:33it because he realized that quantum

32:35mechan mechanics had this implication

32:37that that if things could somehow be

32:39connected quantum mechanically, you

32:41could take them any distance away from

32:43each other and they would somehow be

32:44able to respond to each other

32:46instantaneously with with no time

32:48difference.

32:49And you know, he didn't think that would

32:51ever actually happen. And then back in

32:52the in the in the mid 1990s, we started

32:54to do experiments with atoms and we

32:57found out that it was real. That uh uh

33:00it it can start off pretty simply. you

33:02you have two atoms that are in an orbit

33:04around you know so an atom has a nucleus

33:07of protons and electrons in the middle

33:09sorry [laughter] an atom has a nucleus

33:12of protons and neutrons the electrons

33:14are flying around in orbits around the

33:15uh the atom um two electrons can be in

33:19the same orbit only if they are spinning

33:21in different directions they they have

33:22an an angular momentum it's called spin

33:25and the only way these two electrons can

33:26fit in that orbit together is if they're

33:28spinning one is spinning in an upward

33:29direction one's say spinning in in a

33:31downward ction. Hate the broken finger.

33:34Um, so if if you take these electrons

33:36out of the atom and you can do that, you

33:39know that they're in different spins

33:41because they had to be to be in that

33:42that orbit together. So now you separate

33:44them. You can separate them by any

33:46distance you want. You can separate them

33:47by centimeters in a laboratory. The

33:50Chinese have done this up to the space

33:51station that they run in back. You you

33:53could conceivably do it to another

33:55galaxy. If you take those electrons and

33:57you separate them, you know that they

33:59were spinning in opposite directions. So

34:01if you take an electric field and you

34:02change the spin of one, the other one

34:05immediately changes in response

34:07>> regardless of the distance.

34:08>> Regardless of the distance and we know

34:10this to be true. We've done this. And

34:14the amazing thing is the universe is

34:16saying these two things are the same

34:19quantum mechanical system. They're

34:21basically the same object. They're

34:22connected to each other. They're

34:23entangled together. And it doesn't

34:26matter. Space and time don't matter. You

34:29can you separate them in space any

34:32distance you want. How does that work?

34:35The universe says the space and time

34:36between them doesn't matter. They're the

34:38same system.

34:41To me, that's the real intriguing thing

34:43about you. Could a civilization learn

34:45how to harness that, you know, you're

34:48not really even having to worry about

34:49traveling from one part to another. Have

34:51did you watch the um uh the threebody

34:53problem show? Yeah. So, so you have

34:55these things called sons, right? and

34:57sofans are entangled to this alien

34:59civilization and they can respond

35:02instantaneously because they're

35:03entangled. Yes. I mean I mean that's

35:06fantastic science and as far as I can

35:07tell that that could be theoretically

35:10possible. Yeah.

35:11>> Well, that's what's bonkers is that we

35:14are made out of all this stuff that's

35:16entangled.

35:17>> What's it entangled to? Is it entangled

35:18to stuff inside a black hole right now?

35:20Is it entangled to stuff that is on the

35:22other side of the universe from us? If

35:24the big bang had all of this stuff in a

35:26small volume at once, are we entangled

35:28to everything in some way?

35:33>> Seriously.

35:34>> Seriously.

35:34>> I mean I mean are is a part of me

35:36quantum mechanically right now in the

35:38Andromeda galaxy? Yeah, actually that

35:41would be the implication.

35:43I mean talk about

35:46I don't think we understand yet what

35:47reality is. I really don't. What does it

35:51mean? Are we all somehow the same

35:53particle entangled to each other? You

35:56know, are we connected to everything

35:59all at once?

36:01I mean, that could be where physics is

36:04taking us now.

36:05>> That's bananas. It's very difficult to

36:08think about when you you think you're a

36:11person in Austin. My feet are on the

36:13ground. Yeah.

36:13>> Here I am touching this desk. I'm going

36:15to get in my car later and go get

36:17something to eat.

36:17>> No kidding. You got to feed the cat,

36:19right?

36:19>> Yeah. But that's not really what's going

36:20on.

36:22It's way more complex, way bigger. And

36:24you were speculating that that could be

36:27how some advanced, super advanced

36:30intelligent life form travels.

36:33>> It's always been more compelling to me

36:35than the idea of taking a spaceship and

36:37traveling somewhere.

36:38>> That seems super crude.

36:39>> Yeah.

36:40>> That seems like the idea of making a

36:42horse fly.

36:43>> Yeah. Yeah. I I you know we we we talked

36:46about that movie Interstellar because

36:48there were a lot of good teaching

36:49moments in that movie for for a

36:51physicist. You know the idea that time

36:52really does slow down close to a black

36:54hole. And again we we observe this when

36:56we observe things orbiting close to a

36:58black hole. You can tell that that

36:59happens and the idea that this advanced

37:02civilization that we never actually see

37:04in the movie somehow communicates

37:05through basically space and time itself

37:08through gravity. Um, you know, that's

37:10how Matthew McConna is able to even like

37:12go back, you know, in time and space to

37:14help his daughter solve, you know,

37:16gravity and all that. You know, I was

37:18like I was like, I wonder I wonder if

37:20that's really more what it be like, you

37:22know, advanced civilizations.

37:24I mean, you got to think, right? I mean,

37:26you look around the earth and there are,

37:28you know, things like grasshoppers and

37:29hamsters that are fantastic, incredibly

37:32complex beings, but I mean, you try to

37:34teach them quantum mechanics or ask them

37:35to, you know, crochet a blanket or

37:37whatever. They they don't have the

37:38capacity. And you you've got to think

37:40that there's the similar jump where I

37:43mean, we don't even know the right

37:44questions to ask that sort of a

37:46civilization,

37:47>> you know? I mean, can they see the

37:49universe as a whole thing? Do they know

37:51that they're connected to everything?

37:53And can they somehow use that to travel?

37:56You know, maybe.

37:57>> Maybe. And if you just extrapolate, if

37:59you just think about where we've gone

38:02from primitive man to what we're

38:04currently experiencing, and you take

38:06that thousands of years, millions of

38:09years, whatever it is,

38:10>> yeah,

38:10>> you you keep going. And as long as

38:13civilization

38:15gets rid of war and figures out a way to

38:17not die of disease and natural disaster,

38:19you could potentially continue this

38:22process of technological innovation for

38:25millions of years. And you would imagine

38:26that it would go exponentially

38:29greater and greater in its ability to do

38:31things.

38:32>> Yeah. and its ability to

38:34not just

38:37not even things that we can imagine like

38:41we have a crude understanding amazing

38:44understanding of the universe but crude

38:47in comparison

38:48to what's potentially out there. Well,

38:51we could pot we could potentially be

38:54observing

38:55in a physical way every planet on every

38:58star one day.

39:01But we're not we can't even think of

39:03that as being a possibility now. But but

39:06what we're doing right now is insane to

39:09people that lived in the 1400s.

39:10>> Yeah.

39:12If

39:12>> you showed someone from the 1400s a

39:14nuclear power plant, they'd be like,

39:16"What the are you guys doing?"

39:18Like, "What is this?" See, if you showed

39:19them a nuclear detonate, if you showed

39:21them FaceTime on a phone, they'd be

39:23like, "This is insanity."

39:25>> I just got on a little metal tube and

39:26came here from Milwaukee and I'll fly

39:27back tonight. Yeah. Yeah. Absolutely.

39:30>> And we're just accustomed to it. It it

39:32it becomes normal. And it would become

39:33normal as technology increased further

39:36and further and further. And this idea

39:38that the entire universe would be

39:41accessible is just bananas. Have you

39:44ever wondered if maybe [clears throat]

39:46the real followon to humanity someday

39:48will be some form of AI?

39:50>> I think so.

39:51>> I mean, yeah. I I mean, I do wonder if

39:53the human brain is just kind of limited.

39:55I mean, if you if you say there are

39:56multiple dimensions and time is

39:58something that changes. I mean, I just

40:00said that, you know, I mean, scientists

40:02are no better than anybody else at

40:04comprehending a big number or a big

40:05amount of space. We just kind of get

40:07used to it, you You know, I mean, I

40:08mean, will we have a creature someday

40:10that we've created, an AI that then all

40:13of a sudden can comprehend these things,

40:16you know, is is is that really the real

40:18evolutionary path of humanity?

40:20>> Yeah, I think so. I think it's just a

40:23completely different kind of life and

40:24that we're thinking of it as artificial.

40:27I don't think it's artificial at all. I

40:29think it's a life. It's a just a

40:31different kind of life that we're

40:32>> It's an earthling. I mean, I mean,

40:33seriously, it's our children. We we

40:35created this.

40:36>> Yeah. I always describe ourselves as

40:38like we're an electronic caterpillar and

40:41we're making a cocoon. We don't even

40:43know why we're doing it because it's

40:44just what we do. I mean, the thing about

40:46human beings is we've always been

40:48completely fascinated with innovation.

40:51I've always said that if you looked at

40:52us objectively for some like what does

40:54this species do? Oh, they make better

40:56things. They keep making better things.

40:58They're never satisfied with the things.

41:00Bees made the beehive and like I think

41:01we got it, boys. [laughter] This is it.

41:04we're not satisfied at all. And so if

41:07you just kept going with that, like

41:08where does it go? Well, it has to go to

41:10life. It has to go to some sort of a

41:13human created new kind of life form that

41:16exists out of the components of the

41:18earth, but instead of being born out of

41:21evolution and out of, you know, natural

41:23mutation and natural selection, it's

41:25random mutation. It's made out of us. We

41:28made it and it'll probably make better

41:31versions of it. And that would be the

41:33new life. And that's how you get over

41:35all the biological hurdles that we have.

41:37You think about like the things that

41:38trouble us, war and crime and violence

41:41and all these different things that are

41:43a real problem with the human race.

41:44Well, that all goes away when you stop

41:46being human.

41:48And if we really are entangled with

41:51everything, we that will be us.

41:54It'll just be us in a completely

41:56different realm.

41:57>> Yeah. I I I mean I I do like this idea

41:59that what we call AIs now isn't

42:02something separate. I mean they are our

42:03children. It is an Earthling. It is

42:05something we've created.

42:07The the question I've often wondered is,

42:09you know, sometimes I think sometimes we

42:12lack imagination about what might be

42:14possible. I've always enjoyed science

42:15fiction where the AI also learn about

42:20about love or about the arts or about

42:22creativity. I mean whether you want to

42:24go with like the new battlest star

42:25galactica or whether you want to go with

42:27um uh a pretty profound experience I had

42:30with a friend of mine who's an author

42:31who has colear implants and you know he

42:34realizes that he doesn't hear like a

42:36human you he mean the colear implants

42:39don't replicate perfectly what it means

42:41to hear the way our ears do they bypass

42:44our ears they they wire directly into

42:46his brain and stimulate the experience

42:48of sound

42:50and so he's hearing in his words like a

42:52cyborg

42:53This is Michael Chorus, a wonderful man

42:55that did some essays about this. And and

42:58he he talked about how much um emotional

43:00response he has to music now, something

43:02he could never experience. How being a a

43:05cyborg, quote unquote, you know, and

43:07experiencing something in a non-human

43:09way has added joy and depth and and

43:13passion,

43:15you know? Are are we so sure that

43:18technology makes us more and more, you

43:20know, kind of 1950s robot-like, or could

43:23it take us into new experiences of being

43:24connected with each other, you know, new

43:26ways of loving each other, new ways of

43:28understanding things? I mean, I mean,

43:30does it have to be all bad? This

43:32>> Well, all of our differences fall apart

43:34if we realize we're all one thing.

43:36>> Yeah.

43:36>> If we realize we're all one thing, then

43:39all of our

43:41monopoly of resources, all that, all

43:43that stuff goes away. If we realize

43:45we're all one thing. I mean, part of the

43:46problem with human beings is we're very

43:48selfish.

43:49>> And the reason why we're very selfish is

43:51because that's how you had to survive.

43:52If you wanted your genes to if you

43:54wanted to to survive and you wanted your

43:56genes to be passed on to the next

43:58generation, you had to be selfish

43:59because other people were being selfish

44:01too. And that's the game the humans were

44:02playing. If we get to a point of

44:04universal telepathy,

44:07like universal telepathy with a

44:08universal language where all human

44:10beings are sharing thoughts, there are

44:12no secrets. We are all one thing.

44:14Everyone's terrified of that. People

44:16love secrets. Love I don't want people

44:18listening to my phone. I don't want

44:19people Well, I don't I don't either

44:21because it would be people doing that

44:23and those people have their own ulterior

44:24motives and it's gross that they would

44:26have control. They'd know your emails.

44:29But what if there's no secrets? It's not

44:32possible because our understanding of

44:34each other is now complete.

44:36>> Mhm.

44:37>> It's like we read each other's minds in

44:40a sense, but it's much more complex than

44:42that. and much more much more in depth

44:45like you feel what that person feels.

44:48You are that person and we're all one

44:50thing that that could be possible

44:54through technology. And this is this is

44:56where I have hope where a lot of people

44:59are like very fatalist with AI and you

45:01know they look at it in this dystopian

45:03sense of these oligarchs these technical

45:05oligarch technology oligarchs going to

45:07be controlling off through AI and

45:09they're going to have access to it and

45:10power. I don't know if anybody's gonna

45:13control it. And I have a feeling it's

45:15going to be kind of like the internet in

45:17a way where I don't think they really

45:18thought what the internet was going to

45:19be. I think they had this understanding

45:21of being able to exchange information

45:23through universities and I think it got

45:26to a point where I if they knew what the

45:29internet would be today and how little

45:31control they would have over the

45:32population and narratives and I think

45:34they probably would have shut it down a

45:35long time ago.

45:36>> [snorts]

45:36>> I have a feeling that's going to be the

45:38same way with AI and especially AI as it

45:43integrates with us, which I think is the

45:45only way that the human species really

45:48truly survives. Otherwise, we're just

45:50this archaic biological entity living in

45:53this new world of this ultra superior

45:57life form. But if we integrate with that

46:00thing through wearables, implants,

46:05engineering, if we figure out a way, and

46:08this is going to sound terrible to

46:10anybody who loves being a person, but

46:12all the flaws of being a primate,

46:15there's a lot of these biological reward

46:17systems that are built into us that are

46:19really problematic for progress. I mean,

46:21the reason why are we at war right now?

46:23Well, because there's people with

46:25certain ideologies and there's resources

46:27and there's people that are making money

46:29from their military contractors and

46:32there's politicians that are beholden to

46:33certain interests and then what are we

46:35doing? We're doing the same stupid

46:36that we've been doing for thousands and

46:37thousands of years. Well, how do we get

46:38past that? We get past that by stop

46:40being people.

46:42>> I think you may be right. I mean, again,

46:44that that future is is it is frightening

46:47in some ways, but I I'm I'm I'm more

46:49interested in the imagination. I mean,

46:51instead of just the dystopia, what could

46:53this mean,

46:53>> right?

46:54>> You know, I mean, I mean, how much more,

46:56like we said, I mean, when we were

46:57little tribal groups, you know, the

46:59little wars we had, the skirmishes

47:01didn't really hurt the planet as a

47:02whole. I mean, now we're getting there

47:04so many people and we're still having

47:06these little tribal skirmishes and and

47:07now we're in danger of of, you know,

47:09massive destruction. I mean, we can't

47:12just keep going this way. I mean, it's

47:14it's it's not it's not survivable.

47:15>> It's not. So I mean you know could AI

47:18help us you know tap into some kind of

47:19group consciousness. I mean when we we

47:22were talking about Einstein's idea that

47:24the universe may all be this one big

47:25thing you and this is pure metaphysics

47:28pure conjecture but you know even when I

47:30was a little kid and I heard that I

47:31wondered well you know if all time and

47:33space happens at once is there need for

47:35more than one consciousness even are we

47:37all are we all just looking out of you

47:39know one consciousness looking out of

47:40out of everybody's eyes simultaneously

47:43and not just humans but everything in

47:45the universe you know it's it's a

47:47spectacular idea that you know If there

47:50is a moment, if the universe is just one

47:52big thing, you know, we are part now,

47:56even now, of

47:58beings we have no names for, you know,

48:01super advanced beings that have figured

48:03all of this out and can span the

48:05universe with their consciousness, you

48:07know, that's part of the eyes, too.

48:09That's another part of this

48:10consciousness that we're part of right

48:11now. If if if there's one instant,

48:15you know, it it reminds me of some of

48:16the tenants of, you know, of Buddhism.

48:19There there might be these perfectly

48:20enlightened beings, bodhisattvas, and we

48:22are past lives of them. We're all

48:23existing at once.

48:26You know, it's a it's a fantastically

48:27beautiful idea.

48:28>> It is a beautiful idea. And our survival

48:31instincts are attuned to maintaining

48:35what we are. There there's this thing,

48:37well, I don't want to lose being a

48:38person. But I guarantee you if you went

48:40to an australythecus

48:42and you could somehow communicate to

48:44them, listen, you're going to change and

48:46you're going to be this thing that gets

48:48sick seven times a year and maybe you're

48:50obese and maybe you have a problem with

48:52cigarettes and you know, maybe you drink

48:54too much and you like to gamble and

48:55you're going to your life up here

48:57and there, but you're going to have a

48:58cell phone and you're going to live in a

49:01city and you're going to be breathing

49:02break dust every day and you, you know,

49:04your doctor's going to give you a bunch

49:05of stuff you don't really need because

49:06he's trying to make money.

49:08The Australians are probably like, "Fuck

49:10that. [laughter]

49:12I know what I'm doing here. Sounds much

49:14better."

49:15>> Yeah. I I know where the food is. Like,

49:17get out of here. I don't want any part

49:19of that. And I think that's just part of

49:22survival instincts. Survival instincts

49:24don't want you to radically change into

49:26something completely different with its

49:27own new set of problems.

49:29>> You you want to stay. You want to

49:31maintain. You know, country boy can't

49:33survive. Keep me in the woods. You know

49:34what I mean?

49:36people have this like natural

49:37inclination to keep things simple cuz

49:39they understand them.

49:40>> But I think that's not possible anymore.

49:43And I think we're going to just have to

49:45let it go. Just let that idea go and

49:48relax and uh accept whatever this new

49:51thing is. And I think we're very very

49:54fortunate to be born at this time while

49:56we're experiencing it as regardless of

49:59the outcome. This is a very unique time.

50:02like one of the weirdest times I think

50:05objectively in human history

50:07>> and we're very fortunate to be

50:08experiencing it.

50:09>> I mean you and I are are roughly the

50:11same age and you know I I I think that I

50:13mean for for me having this what they

50:14now kind of you know call the fearal

50:16childhood right where I was unplugged

50:18and and there were you know there were

50:19there were vast stretches of time even

50:21as a small child where I was on my own

50:23you know in the neighborhood stuff and

50:24and I loved it. I mean, I remember going

50:26to, you know, a YMCA camp when I was 11

50:28years old and, you know, everybody had

50:30to show up at breakfast and then there

50:31was an activity time and everybody had

50:33to show up at lunch. But what you did

50:34between that time, you were on your own.

50:36I mean, as an 11-year-old kid, you know,

50:38in the woods, there were activities, you

50:39could do some archery, there was a

50:41rifle, there was craft shop, there was

50:42swimming, and you had to check in at

50:44certain times. But sometimes I just went

50:46and sat in the woods, you know, 11 years

50:48old. I mean, can you imagine?

50:49>> I had this similar experience in the Boy

50:51Scouts.

50:51>> Yeah. Yeah. And you know the thing was

50:53you know so so you and I had this

50:55experience of living unplugged and and

50:58sort of the the idea of of of a quiet

51:01mind and imagination

51:04and but we also saw this tremendous

51:06change and this connectivity which I

51:08love. I mean I also love having the

51:10internet and this my cell phones and all

51:11of that but but but this is a real

51:14change in human civilization that we

51:16went through personally

51:18and I agree with you. I I feel a

51:20tremendous sense of gratitude for for

51:22both ends of my life.

51:23>> Right. We could have been born in the

51:241500s were the 1500s to the 1600s.

51:28>> Not that much changed. I mean

51:30>> for a lot of people. Yeah.

51:31>> Sure. I mean politically things changed,

51:33leaders got overthrown, but as far as

51:35like the way you interfaced with the the

51:37world

51:38>> pretty much the same way. You wrote

51:40stuff down with feathers. [laughter]

51:43>> Yeah.

51:44you know, and and gratitude and like you

51:46said, I mean, maybe instead of all the

51:48dystopia and all the worry and all the

51:50panic right now, you know, going forward

51:51with gratitude.

51:53>> Yeah. Well, I think the unknown gives

51:55people a tremendous amount of anxiety.

51:57>> Sure.

51:57>> For a good reason, you know, I mean, the

51:59unknown could potentially be dangerous

52:01and scary and terrifying or awesome and

52:03you really don't know and so you're

52:05like, what is it going to be? And

52:07there's all these college kids that are

52:08really freaking out because they're

52:11they're went into debt. They're getting

52:13these co college degrees. They're

52:15leaving with this burden, this financial

52:17burden that they can never get rid of.

52:19And on top of that, they have a degree

52:21that might not be worth anything because

52:23AI might completely eradicate their

52:25field. That's a real concern. And so

52:28they they I think kids today that are

52:30graduating from college and graduating

52:32from high school, they probably have the

52:34most amount of anxiety about the future.

52:36That and then there's people that, you

52:38know, they haven't saved any money up.

52:40They don't even know if money is going

52:41to be valuable in the future. Like what

52:43does it even mean? Are are we gonna

52:45abandon all money? Like what what is

52:47what is it going to mean when AI

52:49completely controls all of the

52:50resources, all of the government, all of

52:52everything, all transportation, and you

52:55don't have to do your job anymore? You

52:56just get some funds from the government

52:59where you can buy food. Like this is

53:01what people are talking about. Like this

53:02is a potential, you know, 100 years from

53:05now future.

53:06>> Very seriously so. Yes. Absolutely.

53:08which is terrifying to people that are

53:10thinking, hey, you know, I want to do

53:12what my dad did and what my mom did and

53:15I want to go out there in the world and

53:17I want to find something that I'm

53:19passionate about and make it a career

53:21and like maybe that's not possible. That

53:24to kids right now, I think is really

53:27freaking them out because the adults,

53:29the people like us that are supposed to

53:31be the ones that say, "Well, let me tell

53:32you how it all works. You're going to be

53:34fine. This is what you have to do." And

53:35if you do that and just cross your eyes

53:37and dot your tees, you're going to be

53:39okay, Bob. But maybe you're not going to

53:40be okay. Like maybe we don't know

53:43because that's the reality. The reality

53:44is you and I, the adults, have no idea

53:47what this world's going to look like in

53:4850 years. And these poor kids are they

53:51have no one to turn to. There's no one

53:53that can explain what this and so

53:55they're entering out into the world

53:57having to take care of themselves for

53:58the very first time with this real

54:00possibility that there might not be any

54:02jobs.

54:05On the on the flip side of that, are you

54:07in fact describing the Star Trek

54:09universe, right? You know, a time where

54:11people do not work for everybody has,

54:13you know, anything they need as far as,

54:15you know, apparently survivability, you

54:17know, food, whatever. You know, and now

54:19you have a chance to say, am I going to

54:20be a writer or an explorer or an artist

54:22or a captain or a musician?

54:24>> Yes.

54:24>> You know, I mean, does it does it I mean

54:26I mean I mean is there something in that

54:28that might be hugely liberating?

54:30>> 100%. And I've talked about this as well

54:32that this idea that you have to toil and

54:35you have to be a hunter gatherer or you

54:37know some that you have to do this in

54:39order to find meaning in life is kind of

54:40crazy because we could find meaning a

54:42lot of ways. There's very wealthy people

54:45that never have to work that have

54:46tremendous meaning in their life because

54:48they're doing things all the time

54:49without thinking about work at all.

54:51They're not thinking about it as work.

54:52whatever hobbies they're pursuing or

54:54interests or education they're pursuing,

54:57they're doing it just out of pure

54:58interest and fascination and love and

55:00passion. And that could be all of us.

55:04But there's going to be a tremendous

55:06transition period where people are going

55:08to have to rethink what it means to be a

55:11human being in society. And that's

55:14what's weird because our entire society

55:16is structured out of getting up in the

55:18morning, putting in the work, working

55:20towards a future. You got a 401k, you

55:23got investments, you got this, you got

55:24that, you got a mortgage. And this is

55:26how we've structured our entire

55:29existence and what we what meaning we

55:32gather from life. It's based on that.

55:35We're going to have to figure out a way

55:37to realize and to rethink this. And it's

55:40going to be very difficult for people

55:41that are like 40 and 50 that are just

55:44completely set in their ways and now

55:47their ways change. And I don't know how

55:49many of them are going to be able to

55:50make that switch and what could be done

55:53to assist them in that what can be done.

55:56And maybe that that comes with whatever

55:58this technological interface is. Maybe

56:00that comes with when we become what's

56:03essentially a cyborg that you get a a

56:06much greater understanding of what it

56:08means to exist. And that this idea that

56:10you exist only because the insurance

56:12company you work for is kind of

56:14ridiculous. And we abandon that. I mean

56:17the in the way that now when you open up

56:19your phone and you use perplexity, you

56:22have access to uh

56:25something that's as smart as every human

56:27being on earth in every field. You can

56:30ask it about anything and it'll give you

56:33the state-of-the-art and whatever the

56:35science is, whatever the the

56:37understanding of history, whatever

56:39mathematics,

56:40tax law, whatever it is, it can give it

56:43to you on your phone instantaneously.

56:46And we've just sort of accepted that.

56:48This is our new thing. And I think this

56:50is like a baby step into what it's going

56:52to what this technology could

56:55potentially if you're looking at things

56:56with a glass half full. It could

56:59potentially change the way we look at

57:01everything, the way we look at

57:03ourselves, the way we look at what it

57:04means to be a person and what we find

57:06meaning out of. And this because that's

57:09the problem. The problem is meaning and

57:10the the the feeling like you matter,

57:12feeling like you're important. And I

57:14think part of that is because we're all

57:15so isolated from each other. But that

57:17might go away entirely if the boundaries

57:21between all thought and consciousness.

57:23If we realize like, oh, consciousness is

57:25just a thing that we're all enveloped in

57:28and what our brain is is just a antenna.

57:31It's like tuning into consciousness. And

57:33the depending on how good your antenna

57:35is, you're going to be a little bit

57:36better about how you interface with the

57:39world and whatever thing you desire and

57:41whatever thing you decide to put your

57:43energy and attention to, you maybe

57:45you'll be better at it than another

57:46person because you have a better

57:47antenna. But we might understand that

57:49like we are really truly all one thing.

57:52So all our fears about

57:56you know finding your place in the world

57:58that might be nonsense.

58:00>> I really like that idea. I like the idea

58:02of search for meaning and I agree with

58:04you. I think that as as like you said as

58:06you know Australopythecus as people that

58:07used to exist in these little tribal

58:09groups and families

58:11um the the the modern isolated life. I

58:14mean it's something that I struggle with

58:16a lot. You know I I I'm always wondering

58:18you know where is my family? Where are

58:20my friends?

58:20>> Right?

58:21>> You know I I've had to to do a lot of

58:23sort of interior work about you know I'm

58:25just going to bring along my own

58:27>> family inside somehow. you know, I I had

58:30to provide this all for myself. The idea

58:32of being of being less alone, being less

58:35isolated.

58:36That's one thing that I wanted from the

58:38internet. You know, it started out on

58:40Facebook. I could I could keep up with

58:41my friends, you know, I I saw what they

58:43were doing. They were posting pictures

58:44of their life. It was it was less

58:45isolating. And then now it's evolved to

58:48I can't even find them on Facebook

58:49anymore. It's all, you know, all all the

58:51ads and everything like that. But

58:53[snorts] but but but I mean, for me, I

58:55mean, you you talk about meaning and you

58:57talk about solving isolation.

59:00Tell me tell me more about that. I I

59:02mean the the the how has your sense of

59:04meaning in your life evolved? How has it

59:06changed over your life? How how do you

59:08find meaning?

59:10>> I find meaning in what? Well, there's a

59:12bunch of things, right? First of all,

59:14it's the people that are in your life.

59:16This is a a giant factor because without

59:19people that you love and people that you

59:21enjoy spending time with, life loses all

59:24of its value. If you're an insanely

59:26wealthy, insanely successful person who

59:29has no friends, who lives alone, you're

59:31living in hell. And if you are a poor

59:33person that has amazing friends and

59:35you're just getting by, you are a

59:36happier person. But I guarantee that

59:39poor person would switch places with

59:40that rich person in a heartbeat because

59:43we're programmed to think that success

59:45is numbers. That success is what you can

59:49what you can accumulate as far as like

59:51objects and desired material

59:53possessions.

59:55But it's not. It's like true success is

59:57happiness and the the amount of joy that

1:00:01you get out of life and the amount of

1:00:02satisfaction you get in what you do. So

1:00:04I think for everybody that answer is a

1:00:07different answer because for some people

1:00:08it's going to be music. For some people

1:00:10it's going to be lit. They're going to

1:00:11write they're going to there's going to

1:00:12be a thing that you enjoy putting

1:00:14yourself into that you feel satisfaction

1:00:17and you feel meaning on top of friends

1:00:20and family. So friends and family I

1:00:22think is foremost, but then they can get

1:00:26in the way too if they don't have their

1:00:27together. So like they have to have

1:00:29a thing that they're enjoying as well.

1:00:32They have to have a thing that's helping

1:00:33them grow as an individual. And there's

1:00:36a thing from martial arts. My instructor

1:00:38told me that when I was very young that

1:00:39I never forgot that was martial arts is

1:00:41a vehicle for developing your human

1:00:43potential. And that if you find things

1:00:46that test you and you find things that

1:00:48are complex and these puzzles that you

1:00:50have to solve, the more you do that, the

1:00:52more you get of an understanding of who

1:00:53you are and what you can do and what you

1:00:55can do out there in the world. And the

1:00:56more you do it, the more you can do

1:00:58other things. And I think that's where I

1:01:01find meaning. I find meaning in doing

1:01:03things and enjoying time with my family,

1:01:06enjoying time with my friends, having

1:01:08joy and fun and laughter and then also

1:01:13difficult pursuits. I like things that

1:01:16are complex, the things that are hard to

1:01:18solve. I like things that are hard to do

1:01:20where I I really have to force myself to

1:01:23do it and then I feel satisfaction

1:01:25afterwards and I understand my ability

1:01:26to force myself to do things and in

1:01:30doing that I find meaning and uh I'm a

1:01:33relatively happy person. I think I'm

1:01:36very happy in terms of like the average

1:01:38person. I think that's why. But if

1:01:42someone just took that all away, if all

1:01:44that's gone, would you still have

1:01:46happiness? Like what is happiness,

1:01:48right? What is meaning? And what is it

1:01:52entirely connected to your job? That

1:01:55seems kind of crazy because a job is

1:01:57just a constructed thing that it would,

1:02:00you know, 500 years ago didn't even

1:02:01exist. So what do what it do? We have to

1:02:05have mean are we these complex

1:02:08problem-solving biological organisms

1:02:11that have this thirst for innovation and

1:02:13to constantly make things better?

1:02:17Are we tricking ourselves with jobs to

1:02:21to be happy? Are we filling the need of

1:02:24whatever? Like when a cat chases a ball,

1:02:26what is it doing? What thinks it's

1:02:28killing something? That's its design.

1:02:30This is its biological need. You throw a

1:02:32ball past a cat, it goes after it

1:02:34because it's got this biological need to

1:02:37chase things that are running away from

1:02:38it so it could kill it and eat. And I

1:02:40think we're kind of doing a similar

1:02:42thing with our hunter gatherer tribal

1:02:45organism that we're still trapped in

1:02:48that we're we're tricking it. We're

1:02:50tricking it with complex problems and

1:02:52we're tricking it with community. We're

1:02:54tricking it with all these different

1:02:55things that that keep it happy.

1:02:57>> I agree with you. Yeah, I I think that's

1:02:59that's a wonderful answer. I mean, there

1:03:01there's something about the, you know,

1:03:02the the happy poor person, isolated rich

1:03:04person thing that I I I I agree with.

1:03:06But at the same time, you know, seeing

1:03:08what grinding poverty does to people's

1:03:10minds and breaking them down with

1:03:12exhaustion and and demoralization, you

1:03:14know, there there's obviously some kind

1:03:15of a a sweet spot for there. You know, I

1:03:17mean, I I've had to work quite hard in

1:03:19different parts of my life.

1:03:21>> And I I was just very aware of of the of

1:03:24the [laughter] of the soul grinding, you

1:03:26know, not having enough, not wondering

1:03:28where your next meal is coming from. and

1:03:29and and I have it nowhere near as bad as

1:03:32some. But, you know, the the thing that

1:03:34was absolutely for me um unbelievable

1:03:37about working for NASA was the idea of

1:03:39solving complex problems with people you

1:03:41trusted and people that you thought

1:03:43really had your back and and no

1:03:44organization is perfect. But, you know,

1:03:47the idea that there is it's not a zero-

1:03:49sum game, right? I I mean, you want the

1:03:51whole team to succeed. I mean, even if

1:03:53there are missions you think should have

1:03:54been lower priority or maybe we should

1:03:56spend more money on this and less money

1:03:57on that, at the end of the day, you you

1:04:00want whatever is going on to be

1:04:02fantastic and you want it to succeed and

1:04:03you want all the people around you to

1:04:05succeed. And the idea that again, I

1:04:08mean, this isn't hunter gathering, you

1:04:10know? I mean, we're we're we're solving

1:04:11problems. We're saying, you know, can

1:04:14you take a picture of the black part of

1:04:16a black hole? You know, can you actually

1:04:18see the light area, the event horizon

1:04:20getting sucked in? I'm talking about the

1:04:22event horizon telescope, not a NASA

1:04:23mission. But, you know, there were times

1:04:26in my life like when I first saw that

1:04:27picture come together and I didn't think

1:04:31they'd be able to do that. I don't think

1:04:33people really understand what happened

1:04:34there. They they they were doing

1:04:36something right on the on the on the

1:04:39fuzzy edge of physics being possible.

1:04:42You need to catch the same front of a

1:04:45wavelength of light, right? So, light's

1:04:46coming by. It's a wave. It travels at

1:04:48the speed of light. the wavelength of

1:04:50light is tiny. Let's say for a minute,

1:04:52you know, that they they were they were

1:04:54dealing with with microwaves. So, let's

1:04:56say like a millionth of a meter. So,

1:04:58something that's a a me a meter divided

1:05:00by a million is traveling past you at

1:05:02the speed of light.

1:05:05And the Earth is is round and the Earth

1:05:07is moving. And they had they had these

1:05:09eight observatories all around the

1:05:11planet. And they had to catch that same

1:05:13wavefront, the same one. If it was if it

1:05:16was one wavefront later, one one

1:05:19millionth of a meter later traveling at

1:05:20the speed of light, they wouldn't have

1:05:21gotten the image. They needed to catch

1:05:23the same wave wavelength, the same

1:05:25photon, the same wave of light had to be

1:05:28caught in all of those telescopes at

1:05:29once. One was at the South Pole, some

1:05:31were in the in the United States, some

1:05:33were in Chile. They were all over the

1:05:36planet. And if you caught the same

1:05:39freaking wave of light,

1:05:41>> here it is.

1:05:41>> There you go.

1:05:42>> Wow.

1:05:44>> They they managed to make a telescope

1:05:45that's actually as big as the Earth. And

1:05:47they were able to take a picture of the

1:05:49dark parts of a black hole. Now, now

1:05:51that's that's something called the

1:05:52shadow of the event horizon. It's

1:05:54basically the event horizon where time

1:05:56and space stop. We don't even know if

1:05:58there really is an interior to a black

1:06:00hole. All the equations blow up. Time

1:06:01and space don't exist in there. and and

1:06:04light. Nothing can escape that darkness.

1:06:07The uh the black spot you're seeing

1:06:09there is a little bigger than the event

1:06:10horizon itself. It's called the shadow

1:06:12of the event horizon because um time and

1:06:14space are bent around the black hole.

1:06:17And so some of the light that actually

1:06:19gets sucked in is light that would have

1:06:21gone around the black hole. It gets

1:06:22sucked into the back end of the black

1:06:24hole. Literally space and time curve

1:06:26around the black hole. And so that that

1:06:28dark part is actually a little bigger

1:06:30than the event horizon. It's called the

1:06:31shadow of the event horizon. And um they

1:06:34said they were going to go take a

1:06:35picture of it. And I was like, you have

1:06:39to catch the same wavefront of light

1:06:43in all of these telescopes. I mean,

1:06:44that's going to depend on the height of

1:06:45the mountain, how fast that part of the

1:06:47Earth is moving. They did it. They

1:06:49did it. [laughter] And they they

1:06:51they didn't do it just once, right? And

1:06:54you know, and and and now we can take a

1:06:55picture of an area right in front of

1:06:57your eyes where space and time doesn't

1:06:59exist. I mean to a to a lesser extent,

1:07:03one of the NASA missions that I thought

1:07:04was just spectacular was a small

1:07:06inexpensive mission called NICER. Uh

1:07:09you're like, who's the nicer person?

1:07:10Nicer NICE R. It's the Neutron Star

1:07:13Interior Composition Explorer. And a

1:07:15neutron star. You probably know about

1:07:17these, but but you know, if when a star

1:07:19dies and the nuclear reactions inside a

1:07:21star cease, all of that gravity of this

1:07:24massive object comes crushing in and

1:07:27it'll create an object sometimes called

1:07:29a neutron star. They're about 20 miles

1:07:31across, but they have about twice the

1:07:33mass of the sun. And we study many of

1:07:35these at NASA. They're they're they're

1:07:37all over the place. They're real.

1:07:39They're something you can take a an

1:07:40image of, you can take a picture of. And

1:07:42you know, these neutron stars have

1:07:44physics that we don't understand. You

1:07:46you take you take two times the mass of

1:07:47the sun, you crush it into 20 miles. We

1:07:50know that we can't describe the interior

1:07:52of that thing yet. You know, we don't

1:07:54have the physics that matches that type

1:07:55of density. And um this this this this

1:08:00crazy little little contraption, I mean,

1:08:02it's about the size of a washing

1:08:03machine. It was built in a lab just on

1:08:05the floor that I used to work at at

1:08:06NASA. It's cheap, easy to make. I

1:08:09shouldn't say easy, uh, but I mean it

1:08:11it's actually able to create maps of

1:08:13what the surface of these objects are

1:08:15like. They're 20 miles across. They're

1:08:17thousands of light years away.

1:08:20And you can actually create a map of

1:08:21what the temperature is like. And one of

1:08:23the things we see on these maps is the

1:08:26distortion where space and time curves

1:08:28around these objects. You know, they'll

1:08:30they they rotate very fast and there are

1:08:32hot spots we see coming in and off the

1:08:34the neutron star. But then as the

1:08:36hotspot goes behind the star, the light

1:08:38bends up and over and we can actually

1:08:40still see the hotspot because space and

1:08:42time are bending around these objects.

1:08:44You can see that that that's not a

1:08:47mathematical simulation. That's not a

1:08:49theory. You can see space and time

1:08:52bending around these objects. You can

1:08:54see space and time bending into that

1:08:56event horizon. You know, I mean, it's

1:08:58absolutely crazy what we've been able to

1:09:01do. And whether it's a you know a huge

1:09:03project like the event horizon telescope

1:09:05where I I I would have bet that they

1:09:07would not have been able to make that

1:09:08measurement and they did you know there

1:09:11there were so many hard drives of data

1:09:14uh one of the uh one of the telescopes

1:09:15was at the south pole and uh you wanted

1:09:17you wanted the telescopes to be as far

1:09:19apart on the earth as possible because

1:09:20then you could basically make a giant

1:09:22telescope the size of the separation of

1:09:24these telescopes and uh um there wasn't

1:09:27I mean there's there's pretty good email

1:09:28links down to the South Pole but but the

1:09:31email link wasn't fast enough for all of

1:09:32this data. They they sent back literally

1:09:34there was a ton a ton of hard drives to

1:09:38actually they had to play them all at

1:09:39the same time and make sure they caught

1:09:40the same photon. If they had caught

1:09:43seriously one photon following behind

1:09:45the other, the image wouldn't have

1:09:47worked. They had to catch that same

1:09:48photon. You know, humans are incredible.

1:09:52[laughter]

1:09:52>> Some of us

1:09:54>> Oh, hey,

1:09:55>> some of them, I should say.

1:09:56>> Maybe maybe pretty much all of us in

1:09:58different ways. Yeah, I mean, you know,

1:09:59I

1:10:00>> unrealized potential.

1:10:01>> No, I I got to go back to this. I mean,

1:10:02I mean, one of my good I I have three

1:10:04friends now have won the Nobel Prize,

1:10:06which is always like, you know, what the

1:10:07hell am I doing?

1:10:07>> That's awesome.

1:10:08>> Um, but group Yeah,

1:10:10>> but you have good group chats.

1:10:11>> Well, see, the funny thing is we we

1:10:13certainly don't all get together and

1:10:14talk theoretical physics. I mean, that's

1:10:15not really what we do. But I was seated

1:10:17next to one of them at a meal one time

1:10:18and somebody came by and said, "Oh, look

1:10:20at all the brain power here." And I I

1:10:22actually in this I try to be kind of

1:10:24nice about it, but I said, you know,

1:10:26there's a single mother working three

1:10:27jobs part-time, you know, who's waiting

1:10:29tables over there. And I mean, the the

1:10:31mental capacity and the strength of that

1:10:34person is something that,

1:10:36>> you know, I mean, don't look at us. Go

1:10:38go go go go praise that person.

1:10:39>> Well, that's brain power, too. It's just

1:10:41a different thing.

1:10:42>> It's survival. I mean, it's trying to

1:10:43keep your life and and soul together.

1:10:45the the the privilege of being able to

1:10:47work at NASA and and to be able to work

1:10:50with a team like that and do things you

1:10:52think are impossible,

1:10:54you know, that that was kind of a part

1:10:56of my life you could stick a pen in and

1:10:58say that meant something. You know, that

1:10:59that that gave me some meaning. That

1:11:01that gave me joy.

1:11:03And as you said, it's not so much being

1:11:06a hunter gatherer. It it's it's it's,

1:11:08you know, can we ask a question that we

1:11:10think is impossible and can we just go

1:11:11and do it? Yeah.

1:11:13>> Yeah. the ultimate expression of human

1:11:15curiosity when you say that we don't

1:11:17have the physics when when you're trying

1:11:20to understand what's happening in a

1:11:22neutron star. What do you mean?

1:11:23>> So you can measure how big these things

1:11:25are and you can measure how massive they

1:11:27are and so then you can do a calculation

1:11:29as to what the density inside would be.

1:11:32And you know it I mean to put it I mean

1:11:34probably the interior core is denser

1:11:36than the outer regions but if you had a

1:11:38teaspoon of this material it would have

1:11:40about as much mass as Mount Everest.

1:11:43And um the reason they're called neutron

1:11:45stars is that the gravity is so intense

1:11:48on these things. I mean this I mean I I

1:11:51hate I hate sort of a simple view of

1:11:53atoms as little balls going around each

1:11:54other because they're not they're

1:11:55they're waves of energy, but the gravity

1:11:58actually crushes the electrons into the

1:12:00nucleus. They combine with protons to

1:12:01become neutrons. So they're they're

1:12:03mainly little balls of neutrons. But we

1:12:06we do There you go. Uh you see the big

1:12:08question mark there at the core. So So

1:12:11here's the problem. you you you you you

1:12:13run our our basic laws of physics, our

1:12:15understanding of how particles work and

1:12:17you get to the density of a neutron core

1:12:19and and the equations don't work.

1:12:21They're not making the right

1:12:22predictions. We can tell that there is

1:12:25um there's actually a really great NASA

1:12:27video I I would I would I would suggest

1:12:29you watch it. It's called um the the

1:12:31interior of a neutron star. uh well I

1:12:34can help you find it but it it basically

1:12:36says that that the

1:12:37>> the models we have about how matter

1:12:40works at that sort of density none of

1:12:42them give the right predictions for the

1:12:43the size of the neutron star.

1:12:45>> Why is that?

1:12:46>> We don't have the right physics for it

1:12:48yet.

1:12:48>> So so you know we run our physics and we

1:12:50say if you have this much volume and

1:12:52this much mass what should that interior

1:12:54be like? And and none of our current

1:12:57models of how matter works gives us the

1:12:59right observations gives us the right

1:13:00size.

1:13:01>> So what are we missing? Well, um, for

1:13:04one thing, you know, what you're

1:13:06probably looking at inside a neutron

1:13:08star is some type of interaction of

1:13:10quarks, the actual the actual sort of

1:13:11building blocks of neutrons and protons,

1:13:13the particles that make up protons and

1:13:15neutrons.

1:13:16>> Oo, that's cool.

1:13:16>> Yeah. There. Oh, you got it. You got it.

1:13:18You're amazing. I I I have to say I'm

1:13:20seriously impressed by this person's uh

1:13:22ability. Yeah. So, I mean, this is a

1:13:25video that it was done by uh by NASA,

1:13:27Testing Matters Limits. It's a 4-minute

1:13:29video and and while I don't think it's

1:13:31an absolutely perfect video, I'm I think

1:13:33it's fantastic. And so you see the uh

1:13:36this is supposed to represent the

1:13:37electrons being pulled into the the

1:13:39nucleus and making neutrons. And then at

1:13:42the very heart of these things, we're in

1:13:44a state of matter that we have no

1:13:46description for yet. We we we can't tell

1:13:48you how it behaves. We we've never

1:13:50created it in a lab. We we you we don't

1:13:53know how this type of matter acts. It's

1:13:55a new state of matter. We we don't know

1:13:57what it's like.

1:13:58>> Wow.

1:13:58>> And uh you know it's it's made when when

1:14:01one of these giant stars explodes you

1:14:03know the the core of the star becomes

1:14:05compressed. And then this this will take

1:14:07you through us trying to figure out what

1:14:09you know whether you know you have

1:14:10particles as discrete particles as

1:14:12neutrons and protons or whether there's

1:14:14some type of quark soup inside. But but

1:14:17pretty much every model so far doesn't

1:14:20match what we actually measure from

1:14:23these things. We we we cannot describe

1:14:25them yet. We we need better physics.

1:14:27>> Are there any other structures that are

1:14:29similar in our lack of understanding of

1:14:31them in the universe?

1:14:32>> Well, we got you got two big ones right

1:14:33in front of you. Neutron stars and black

1:14:35holes, right? So, so I mean these the

1:14:37black holes as well. You know, what is

1:14:39inside a black hole? Is there an inside

1:14:42if space and time don't really exist? Um

1:14:45you know, and then and then much more

1:14:47easy to see are these neutron stars. The

1:14:50the people who study neutron stars at

1:14:51NASA, they had this wonderful

1:14:52expression. They're like, "With a black

1:14:54hole, you can't see anything. it

1:14:55collapses into an event horizon.

1:14:56Nothing's coming out. With a neutron

1:14:58star, you got the freaking thing right

1:14:59there in front of you. You can actually

1:15:00observe something. And so, you know,

1:15:03they they figured that neutron stars are

1:15:04much more exciting than black holes

1:15:05because you can actually like do

1:15:07experiments, take a picture, build a

1:15:08telescope. And uh but but this

1:15:11experiment was an inexpensive small

1:15:14observatory that that's up on the

1:15:15International Space Station. And I mean

1:15:17I mean it's they're they're doing

1:15:19incredible work about the the nature of

1:15:22physics and and and testing where our

1:15:24limits are. It's it's unbelievable what

1:15:25you can do with even a a relatively

1:15:27inexpensive mission.

1:15:29>> When you look at the size of some black

1:15:32holes, we were talking the other day

1:15:34about the largest black hole where the

1:15:36event horizon goes past Pluto.

1:15:38>> Yeah.

1:15:39>> If it was the the size of our solar

1:15:40system.

1:15:41>> Absolutely. that that's almost

1:15:43impossible to even think about that

1:15:46there's a black hole that's bigger than

1:15:48our solar system. And how did it get

1:15:51that big? [laughter]

1:15:52>> How much time does it take for it to

1:15:55gather up that much matter to get that

1:15:58big?

1:15:58>> Well, you were talking about these

1:15:59little red dots that the web telescope

1:16:01is seeing. So, I mean, what you've just

1:16:02done is put your finger on, I think, one

1:16:05of the most fascinating unanswered

1:16:06questions in astronomy right now. that

1:16:09every major galaxy has a has a big black

1:16:12hole in the center. You know, the the

1:16:13one in the middle of our galaxy is about

1:16:154 million times the mass of the sun and

1:16:18and physically it's not that big. It's

1:16:20it's about let's say around about the

1:16:22orbit of say the inner solar system

1:16:23Mercury kind of around there. But then

1:16:26the bigger ones we know in other

1:16:28galaxies can get up to hundreds you know

1:16:30I mean let's say you know tens of

1:16:32billions of times the mass of the sun

1:16:34and and those the event horizons about

1:16:36the size of the orbit of Pluto.

1:16:39The the question is how do you gather 10

1:16:42billion times the mass of a star

1:16:44together in the beginning? You know we

1:16:47black holes the only thing we know that

1:16:49forms big black holes like that. So a

1:16:51star collapses a star dies and this you

1:16:54know this tremendous crush of gravity as

1:16:56the star collapses creates this

1:16:58bottomless pit of gravity called a black

1:17:00hole. So how do you get that many stars

1:17:03to die? How do you I mean in the early

1:17:05universe, how many stars what how many

1:17:06generations of stars had had to burn

1:17:09through to actually get that to happen?

1:17:11And there was nothing that we could

1:17:13figure out. I mean I mean how do you

1:17:14make that big of a black hole? So these

1:17:16these little red dots that we're seeing

1:17:18with with with web and and when we don't

1:17:21know exactly what these are, but but but

1:17:24right now the observations are pushing

1:17:25us in a very interesting direction.

1:17:28They're they're about a million times

1:17:30the mass of the sun. And at first we

1:17:34thought, okay, well, are these whole

1:17:35galaxies? And and that was the the

1:17:36controversy you alluded to that that how

1:17:38how could there be galaxies that far

1:17:40back in time? We're we're looking back

1:17:42to a time about 400 million years after

1:17:45the Big Bang. We're looking so far away.

1:17:47The light took that long to travel to

1:17:48us.

1:17:50So we we we saw these these these sort

1:17:52of bright objects. At first we thought

1:17:54they were galaxies, and that was like,

1:17:55whoa, how'd they get there so fast? But

1:17:58then we took a better look at them and

1:17:59they don't actually shine in the same

1:18:01light a galaxy would. They and they

1:18:03appear to have the signature of

1:18:05something inside. Some of them rotating

1:18:07very fast. Very fast.

1:18:10And what we're wondering is if the first

1:18:13generation of stars, the very first

1:18:15stars that existed were nothing at all

1:18:18like the stars we have today. The

1:18:20universe was denser. There was probably

1:18:22more of this stuff called dark matter

1:18:24that had gravity pulling everything

1:18:26together. So maybe at at that time the

1:18:29universe had just there were cores of

1:18:31huge amounts of gas that collapsed

1:18:32together. Instead of forming a star, the

1:18:36core basically collapsed into a black

1:18:37hole immediately and it started pulling

1:18:40in material and all this sort of hot

1:18:41stuff formed what they call a pseudo

1:18:44star. There's all this this this

1:18:46atmosphere of hot gas being heated up by

1:18:48by the black hole in the middle. As as

1:18:50as the gas spirals in towards the black

1:18:51hole, it gets hotter and hotter. So

1:18:53instead of a nuclear fusion core of a

1:18:55star, you have a black hole heating

1:18:57everything up on the inside,

1:18:59accumulating all this mass. And are we

1:19:02looking at for the first time the seeds

1:19:05of these giant black holes

1:19:07that instead of there being you know the

1:19:10first thing was stars the way we think

1:19:12of stars was the first thing huge

1:19:15amounts of gas and dust collapsing into

1:19:17black holes and heating up sort of a you

1:19:20know a pseudo star around it millions of

1:19:22times the mass of the sun and then in a

1:19:25dense area like the heart of a galaxy

1:19:27these things then start to combine over

1:19:29time gravity pulls them together and you

1:19:31build bigger and bigger black holes.

1:19:34So once again, we don't know yet that

1:19:37these are what what's that's what go

1:19:39that these objects are. But at the

1:19:40moment, it's one of the best

1:19:41explanations we have and it fits the

1:19:44data quite well. So you know, we will

1:19:47keep observing these things. We will

1:19:48keep finding new ones. Uh one of the big

1:19:51questions has been why don't they give

1:19:52off more X-rays? Because if there's

1:19:54matter streaming down a black hole, it

1:19:56should give off very high radiation like

1:19:58X-rays. And then just in the last couple

1:20:00of months, there are some uh some

1:20:01observations coming out where we're

1:20:03finding some of these are indeed X-ray

1:20:04sources.

1:20:06So, we may have found the answer to

1:20:09where you get these big black holes.

1:20:11>> And and that was one of the the big

1:20:14hopes for the James Webb Space Telescope

1:20:16that it would help us answer the

1:20:18question of where do you get these giant

1:20:20black holes in the cores of galaxies?

1:20:22Where do they come from? There shouldn't

1:20:24have been enough time for that many

1:20:25stars to make them.

1:20:28>> [sighs]

1:20:28>> I watched a documentary around black

1:20:30holes once where they were talking about

1:20:31that in the center of every galaxy

1:20:33there's a super massive black hole

1:20:34that's 1/ half of 1% of the mass of the

1:20:37entire galaxy.

1:20:38>> It seems to be correlated. Yeah. The

1:20:39bigger the galaxy, the bigger the black

1:20:40hole. Yeah.

1:20:40>> Which is nuts. And the what they were

1:20:43theorizing was that if you went through

1:20:48that black hole, you could potentially

1:20:50be in a completely different universe

1:20:52filled with galaxies all that have black

1:20:54holes inside of them. through that

1:20:56another universe that you would have an

1:20:59infinite number of universes that exist

1:21:02and all there's these like black holes

1:21:04and if you can go through them all of

1:21:06them and it broke my brain cuz I'm just

1:21:09sitting there I'm thinking like wait a

1:21:10minute how many billions of galaxies are

1:21:12there?

1:21:13>> Yeah.

1:21:13>> Like what and each one of them has a

1:21:15black hole in the center of it?

1:21:16>> Yeah. Well, and and I mean we don't know

1:21:19yet how many uh I mean there there are

1:21:22these giant black holes in the middle of

1:21:23galaxies and then there are smaller

1:21:24black holes caused when massive stars

1:21:26dies and you our galaxy probably has

1:21:28millions of those. But the uh the ones

1:21:31in the in the in the center of the

1:21:32galaxies are fascinating. The um the one

1:21:34in our galaxy so we're about about

1:21:3725,000 lighty years away from the sky so

1:21:39we're safe. But um

1:21:42we actually observed stars that are

1:21:44trapped around the black hole that are

1:21:46orbiting the black hole. This was the

1:21:47first way we found the location of the

1:21:49black hole. Stars were orbiting kind of

1:21:51like this angry swarm of bees almost in

1:21:53every direction. And they were orbiting

1:21:55around something you didn't see. And the

1:21:57mass needed to make all these stars

1:21:59orbit was about four million times the

1:22:00mass of the sun. There was a star called

1:22:03S2 we observed orbiting close to the

1:22:05black hole, kind of like a comet. It

1:22:07would come in and whip around the black

1:22:08hole, then go back out again. and an S2

1:22:10at closest approach when it whips around

1:22:12the black hole. This is a star goes

1:22:15nearly 20 million miles an hour as it

1:22:18whips around the black hole. And then

1:22:20just recently we found another star that

1:22:22actually gets up to over 50 million

1:22:24miles an hour as the black hole whips it

1:22:27around. And this is how we test the idea

1:22:29that time is different around a black

1:22:30hole. We actually see these stars

1:22:32whipping so close to a black hole. We

1:22:34can tell that there are changes in their

1:22:36orbit, that they're actually going

1:22:37through different time.

1:22:39And uh um and so we see these stars

1:22:41whipping around the black hole at the

1:22:43middle of our galaxy. They will probably

1:22:44eventually go down that black hole. I

1:22:46mean, maybe everything in our galaxy

1:22:48will eventually kind of spiral down into

1:22:50that black hole. But you know, we we

1:22:53this is this is not conjectural. These

1:22:56are observations from telescopes. You

1:22:59know, look up S2. Look up I don't know

1:23:01what the name of the one that it goes

1:23:02faster. It's a telephone telephone

1:23:04number, but that's real.

1:23:08Now, the question about what happens if

1:23:10you could survive going into a black

1:23:12hole, and this is another place where we

1:23:14need better physics. Quite honestly, our

1:23:15physics gives up.

1:23:18There are all kinds of wonderful,

1:23:21fascinating possibilities. I mean,

1:23:23people have pointed out this is not

1:23:25observation. Now, we're going from

1:23:27observation, we see these things,

1:23:28they're real to conjecture. People have

1:23:32said that if you take the entire

1:23:33universe, the the the entire mass of the

1:23:36universe and the radius that the

1:23:38diameter of the observable universe

1:23:40almost exactly matches a black hole. You

1:23:43know, you could it be that, you know,

1:23:45inside a black hole, a new universe

1:23:47forms when a black hole forms. Is that

1:23:49what the big bang was? Was the big bang

1:23:51a black hole forming in another universe

1:23:53and popping off our own universe? Are

1:23:56black holes somehow connected to other

1:23:57universes? These are all incredible

1:24:00questions. We we don't yet have the

1:24:02physics to answer them. But you know,

1:24:05people have said, you know, why is it

1:24:07the universe has about the same density

1:24:09of a black hole, the same size and mass?

1:24:12Is that just a coincidence or are we

1:24:14looking at something deeper?

1:24:15>> Or is it fractal? Is it the entire

1:24:17universe exists inside of a black hole?

1:24:19>> Yes, exactly.

1:24:20>> That's bananas.

1:24:21>> Yeah. There there we have the the very

1:24:24large array that was at the uh that was

1:24:26in Chile. That's a wonderful

1:24:27observatory. There we have a a great uh

1:24:30depiction. Oh, he he you found Okay.

1:24:32Yeah, I've never seen a depiction like

1:24:35that's the stars moving around a black

1:24:36hole.

1:24:36>> Yeah, the stars moving around a black

1:24:37hole.

1:24:38>> What's coming? What would this ejection

1:24:40be?

1:24:40>> Um so that Okay. What what that is is

1:24:42that that's a consequence of the black

1:24:44holes. Um that doesn't come from inside

1:24:46the black hole. All of that swirling gas

1:24:48gets really fast. We actually observe

1:24:50some of the swirling gas going close to

1:24:52the speed of light. Black holes, you

1:24:54know, they're they're going down the

1:24:55drain. They're going faster and faster

1:24:56as you get closer to the black hole. And

1:24:58um all of that very very hot gas

1:25:00generates a very strong magnetic field.

1:25:03And so what you're looking at with those

1:25:04jets is that that's just the magnetic

1:25:06field of the hot gas going around the

1:25:08black hole. Some of that hot gas gets

1:25:10directed into jets by the magnetic

1:25:12field. There's nothing coming out of the

1:25:13black hole. Nothing that we know of

1:25:15comes out of a black hole. But black

1:25:17holes are incredibly This is This is

1:25:19wonderfully ironic. They're incredibly

1:25:21bright because if there's gas trying to

1:25:23get around a spinning around a black

1:25:24hole, the gravity accelerates that gas

1:25:27so fast it spins it up to in some cases

1:25:29millions or billions of degrees. You can

1:25:31see them clear across the observable

1:25:33universe. They're the brightest objects

1:25:34in the sky. And this this is not light

1:25:37coming from inside the black hole. It's

1:25:38light coming from stuff trapped around

1:25:40the black hole as it spirals in. And

1:25:43these huge jets, we we see some of these

1:25:45jets going, you know, in some cases more

1:25:47than 100,000 lightyears. I mean they're

1:25:49they're huge jets that come out

1:25:51>> 100,000 lighty years and one light years

1:25:53is how many trillion miles?

1:25:54>> Six trillion miles about [laughter]

1:25:57>> Yeah. Yeah. So

1:25:58>> Oh my god.

1:25:59>> And then in the uh

1:26:00>> Oh my god.

1:26:01>> Yeah. So I mean around uh um around

1:26:04>> that video is so nuts.

1:26:06>> I've never seen that.

1:26:07>> Yeah.

1:26:07>> When I was looking for this or stumbled

1:26:09across this I saw a theoretical thing

1:26:11called a white hole

1:26:12>> which is potentially maybe on the other

1:26:14side of a black hole.

1:26:15>> You know the the

1:26:17>> Yeah. No, no, no. It's it's an idea. I

1:26:18mean, that idea, honestly, it had a lot

1:26:21more um uh following, you know, more in

1:26:23the in like the 60s and 70s. It's kind

1:26:25of fallen out of favor because at first

1:26:27we thought that the these hugely bright

1:26:29objects were were white holes at the end

1:26:30of a black hole. Maybe the radiation

1:26:32went through a tunnel through space and

1:26:34came out somewhere. But now we know that

1:26:36these super bright objects are actually

1:26:38hot gas discs around black holes. And

1:26:40they are bright. Like I said, they're

1:26:42the brightest things we know of in the

1:26:43sky. and uh you know so that's that's

1:26:46something you can see you know literally

1:26:48billions of light years away is the hot

1:26:50gas going around a black hole.

1:26:51>> You said another thing that broke my

1:26:53brain. Um you were talking about

1:26:57what the big bang is and that we

1:27:00shouldn't think of the big bang as an

1:27:02explosion

1:27:04but that before the big bang time and

1:27:08space might not have existed.

1:27:11>> Well pretty much certainly not in the

1:27:13way we experience them. No, I mean I

1:27:15mean once again, you know, no astronomer

1:27:18thinks the big bang came from nothing.

1:27:21The problem is once again we have no

1:27:24description of what that state of matter

1:27:26would be. None.

1:27:28I mean the idea that everything we

1:27:30observe of in the universe could have

1:27:31once been at a subatomic scale.

1:27:34You'll notice I'm very careful about

1:27:36this. I talk about the observable

1:27:37universe. We have no idea how big the

1:27:40universe is. We don't know whether it's

1:27:41infinite or whether it has an end. But

1:27:43there's been only a certain amount of

1:27:45time that light has had to travel to us.

1:27:47That's not the whole universe. That

1:27:49that's centered on us. That's an effect.

1:27:51If we look in every direction in the

1:27:52sky, we can only look back as far as

1:27:55there's been time for light to actually

1:27:57travel to us. And you see some

1:27:59incredible things. I mean, one of the

1:28:01things that uh one of my friends has the

1:28:02Nobel Prize for is if you look so far

1:28:05away, the farthest away we can see now,

1:28:08we're looking back to a time about

1:28:10400,000 years after the Big Bang. And

1:28:12this is something where we are actually

1:28:15able to see so far away. We're looking

1:28:17back to a time when the whole universe

1:28:19was hot and bright. It actually was

1:28:22glowing like the surface of the sun. The

1:28:23whole universe. The entire universe was

1:28:26so bright. It was like looking at the

1:28:28surface of the sun. And and this is is

1:28:31has now this radiation has traveled a

1:28:34long time to get to us. It's now lost

1:28:36energy because it's traveling through

1:28:38the expanding universe. And as the

1:28:40universe expands, the the wave the

1:28:42wavelength of light gets stretched out

1:28:44by the expansion of space. This is what

1:28:46we call the microwave background

1:28:48radiation.

1:28:49So there there's there's a there's a

1:28:51microwave very low energy signal. It

1:28:53comes from every direction on the sky.

1:28:55And it's coming from a time it's coming

1:28:57from a distance so far away that the

1:29:00whole universe was as bright as the

1:29:02surface of the sun. And and that's as

1:29:05far as we can see because any farther

1:29:08away from that the universe is opaque

1:29:11literally in every direction on the sky

1:29:13you eventually look back to a time when

1:29:15the whole universe was so dense and

1:29:17bright you can't see any farther.

1:29:19>> Is this because of how we're capable of

1:29:22measuring? And is it possible that at

1:29:24one point in time when we get better and

1:29:26better telescopes that we can look past

1:29:29that?

1:29:30>> Well, not with light. See, see the

1:29:31universe actually does become opaque to

1:29:33light at that point

1:29:34>> because it's too long ago.

1:29:36>> It's it's it's basically the universe is

1:29:38so bright itself. Yeah. I mean, so you

1:29:41know, you look in any direction on the

1:29:43sky, you look back to a time, you know,

1:29:45we the wonderful thing about the

1:29:47universe changing is we know this is

1:29:48true. The farther out we look with a

1:29:50telescope, the farther light has had to

1:29:52travel, the the more time it takes to

1:29:54get to us. So the sun we see the light

1:29:57takes about eight minutes to get from us

1:29:58to the sun. the nearest star about four

1:30:00years. The nearest galaxy to us about

1:30:02two million years. We can see so far

1:30:05away in space that the light took pretty

1:30:07much the age of the universe to get to

1:30:09us about 400,000 years after the big

1:30:11bang. At that point, the universe

1:30:13becomes opaque to light.

1:30:16So there is a limit to how much we can

1:30:18observe with light, how much time there

1:30:21has been for for light to actually get

1:30:23to us.

1:30:24>> Is there a potential for being able to

1:30:25observe with something other than light?

1:30:28Absolutely. So your question is a really

1:30:32profound one. We don't know how big the

1:30:34universe is. When we talk about the

1:30:36universe, we mainly talk about the

1:30:38observable universe, everything we're

1:30:39able to see. So the question you just

1:30:42asked, can you see farther back, even if

1:30:44it's opaque to light? Yes. And and this

1:30:48is something that again we talk about

1:30:50moments in your life where the universe

1:30:51changed, where you thought people people

1:30:54did something you thought was

1:30:55impossible. And um I mean going all the

1:30:58way back to the mid 90s I was a posttock

1:31:00at Caltech and um I wasn't working with

1:31:03this department but people were starting

1:31:05to measure something called

1:31:06gravitational waves

1:31:08and gravitational waves again I I never

1:31:12thought they'd be able to actually

1:31:13detect these. The the universe is is

1:31:16constantly I mean I mean every time we

1:31:18move remember how I said time is

1:31:20different from the top of your head to

1:31:21the bottom of your feet. You know, as I

1:31:23move, I create gravity. You know,

1:31:26gravity actually is it goes out as a

1:31:28wave into the universe at the speed of

1:31:29light. Can you detect a wave of gravity?

1:31:33Well, a gravity is actually a curvature

1:31:36of space and time itself. So, you're

1:31:38you're trying to say, could we detect a

1:31:41wave that's actually made of space and

1:31:42time? And this project is called LIGO.

1:31:46And LIGO stands um LIGO stands for the

1:31:49Laser Interferometric Gravitational Wave

1:31:51Observatory. And it started out with

1:31:53with two facilities, one in Oregon and

1:31:55one in Louisiana. And LIGO has two

1:31:58extremely long lasers at at a corner

1:32:00that at a right angle. The lasers I I

1:32:03believe are 4 kilometers on a side.

1:32:06They're huge, right? A 4 km laser. They

1:32:09want them to be as as perfectly the same

1:32:11length as they can. And then there's a

1:32:13laser beam that bounces back and forth.

1:32:16And and as the laser beam bounces back

1:32:18and forth, if it's exactly the same

1:32:20length, they the signal kind of cancels

1:32:22out.

1:32:23But what happens if there's actually a

1:32:26wave of space and time coming by? Space

1:32:29itself compresses. Time changes. All of

1:32:32a sudden, these two these two lasers are

1:32:35no longer exactly the same length. Space

1:32:37itself has changed as as a wave comes

1:32:39by.

1:32:41tiny amounts. These gravitational waves

1:32:43are thousands of times smaller than the

1:32:45nucleus of an atom.

1:32:47>> Incredible, right? How would you detect

1:32:49that? And they're traveling at the speed

1:32:50of light.

1:32:52So, you have these 4 kilometer lasers,

1:32:56a wave of space and time comes by and

1:32:58compresses space and time in one

1:33:00direction more than the other. All of a

1:33:01sudden, the lasers are no longer the

1:33:03same length. You get a signal. The the

1:33:06noise for this, right? I mean, I mean,

1:33:08every time Yeah. So, this is us

1:33:10detecting an exploding star this way.

1:33:11I'm happy to talk about that, too. But,

1:33:13but I mean, just the fact they did this,

1:33:16the these lasers are under vacuums.

1:33:18They're in vacuum chambers. I mean, they

1:33:20try every time the UPS truck goes by,

1:33:22they must go haywire. Somebody sneezes.

1:33:24They're measuring things thousands of

1:33:25times smaller than the nucleus of an

1:33:27atom.

1:33:29But over time they got this so accurate.

1:33:31They did it so well that what what

1:33:34happened and I I you can look up the the

1:33:36year but it was um something on the

1:33:37order of about 10 years ago

1:33:40a long ways away millions of light years

1:33:42away um two black holes spiraled

1:33:45together and actually collided to form a

1:33:47big black hole. That was a lot of

1:33:50gravitational energy and that created a

1:33:52ripple going out into the universe. And

1:33:55so you know there's all of the detectors

1:33:57have all this noise in them. The

1:33:58detectors are detecting all kinds of

1:33:59spurious signals. But then all of a

1:34:01sudden in Louisiana, there was this the

1:34:04whole detector went w boom. And then at

1:34:07the speed of light, the detector in

1:34:09Louisiana did exactly the same thing. B

1:34:12the exact same waves at the speed of

1:34:14light difference. And we realized, oh my

1:34:16god, they did it. These tiny waves,

1:34:20we shouldn't even be able to detect

1:34:22them. They found them. And and now it's

1:34:25a it's a routine thing. They've now done

1:34:26this many, many times.

1:34:29Waves in space and time itself might be

1:34:32the way we can see even farther back

1:34:34into the universe. Even when the

1:34:36universe becomes opaque to light, the

1:34:39waves of space and time can come

1:34:40through. Gravitational waves can come

1:34:42through that. And if we can somehow

1:34:45figure out how to make these detectors

1:34:46better and better, you know, could we

1:34:48detect the gravitational waves of the

1:34:50Big Bang? You know, can we learn

1:34:53something about that moment by the way

1:34:56it actually bent space and time and

1:34:57created waves of gravity? And once

1:35:00again, I mean, just a step back a sec.

1:35:01The detecting waves of space and time

1:35:04traveling at the speed of light is

1:35:06something we do.

1:35:09We've done this. It got the Nobel Prize,

1:35:11deserved it. Um, there were there were

1:35:14hundreds of people on that first paper.

1:35:16Some of them were friends of mine. Um,

1:35:19again, they they did it, you

1:35:21know. [laughter] I I I I I just I I

1:35:23cannot I mean I I I I felt my heart just

1:35:26drop that day. I mean out of out of joy.

1:35:28I just it's it's like holy you know

1:35:30they did it. Um that may give us the

1:35:34potential to understand the big bang

1:35:35better as we get better with that. Um

1:35:38you know maybe we can I mean right now

1:35:39we see black holes colliding. We

1:35:41actually see neutron stars colliding.

1:35:43Even stars orbiting each other maybe

1:35:45maybe produces sort of a background of

1:35:47all these waves. But maybe we'll be able

1:35:49to figure out how to see those waves

1:35:50from the moment the universe began.

1:35:53>> How are we sure that of the timeline of

1:35:5713.8 billion years or whatever it is?

1:36:00>> Well, you know, I mean, the these things

1:36:02are never sure, you know, absolutely.

1:36:04But but but there there there's some

1:36:06very good reasons to think it's it's

1:36:07about that. So, you know, you you sort

1:36:10of run physics backwards. You know, you

1:36:12basically say, you know, this is how the

1:36:14universe is expanding now. And Lind,

1:36:16let's let's roughly say that, you know,

1:36:18things, you know, came together. And as

1:36:20I mentioned, you mentioned the podcast,

1:36:22the Big Bang did not have a center. The

1:36:24galaxies are not flying off into space

1:36:25like an explosion. You what what

1:36:27happened is the galaxies are all kind of

1:36:29sort of standing where they are, but

1:36:31space itself is expanding in every

1:36:33direction between the galaxies. It was

1:36:35it's a hard thing. I mean, I this it's a

1:36:38huge misconception about the Big Bang

1:36:40that the Big Bang was this explosion and

1:36:43galaxies are flying into empty space.

1:36:45The the expansion of space is space

1:36:47itself. There's no space out there that

1:36:50galaxies are flying into. That's not how

1:36:51it works,

1:36:52>> right?

1:36:53>> You know, when I

1:36:54>> That's a weird thought right there.

1:36:56They're not flying into space, they are

1:36:58space. When when I when I used to teach

1:37:00this, you know, I used to I used to take

1:37:02a a board and I used to have a piece of

1:37:04elastic and I would I would hammer two

1:37:06nails in on either side of the board and

1:37:08then I would say, "Okay, the these two

1:37:09nails are galaxies and the elastic

1:37:12between them represents our universe."

1:37:14In this case, a two-dimensional

1:37:15depiction of our universe. All of space

1:37:18and time anywhere light can travel is on

1:37:20just on that elastic. Don't think about

1:37:22up or down. There's no space or time

1:37:23there. Everything our universe is is

1:37:25just this piece of elastic, you you

1:37:27know, and then I would take the elastic

1:37:28and I would stretch it and I would say

1:37:30by by by you know, the two galaxies

1:37:32aren't moving. They're they're kind of

1:37:34sitting there. It's the space in between

1:37:36that has now stretched, has now changed.

1:37:40And that's a more realistic idea. The

1:37:42galaxies are not flying through space.

1:37:44It's the space itself that is getting

1:37:47bigger in every direction at once. And

1:37:49that's why there's no center. There's no

1:37:50empty center to the universe. The

1:37:52universe, as far as we can map it, has

1:37:54galaxies everywhere. you know there's no

1:37:57center to it. The expansion is happening

1:37:59in every direction at once because the

1:38:01the the elastic of space and time itself

1:38:04in every direction is just getting

1:38:06bigger. We don't know why.

1:38:08>> So if we are looking at something where

1:38:14the big bang created space and time and

1:38:17as space and time is expanding what was

1:38:21the environment

1:38:23before the big bang?

1:38:24>> Yeah. And that's the problem. So you

1:38:26mean I mean we have no description of

1:38:28that. You know there there there are

1:38:31particle accelerators. I've had the the

1:38:34wonderful chance to go to us to go to

1:38:36CERN a couple of times and go to the

1:38:37Large Hadron Collider and you know you

1:38:40know using you know incredible

1:38:43accelerating magnets. You know they they

1:38:45whip you know just single protons up to

1:38:47very very high temperatures.

1:38:50I mean, they're they're trying to

1:38:51recreate conditions where, you know, I

1:38:54mean, they can't recreate the conditions

1:38:56of what things were like before the Big

1:38:57Bang, but, you know, can you get matter

1:38:59to such a high energy state that it can

1:39:02recreate what things were like, you

1:39:03know, a millionth of a second after the

1:39:04Big Bang, you know, or maybe even

1:39:06further back? And, you know, but the

1:39:10idea of what was that state of matter

1:39:12before that that expansion, we have no

1:39:15description of yet. I think we will

1:39:16someday. I don't think it's impossible.

1:39:19But there there's nothing about our

1:39:21current physics. I mean, it would be

1:39:23like taking somebody from the 1400s and

1:39:26saying, you know, describe to me what

1:39:28the interior of the sun is like. They

1:39:29they would have we they would have no

1:39:31knowledge structure to even attempt it.

1:39:35That doesn't mean we didn't figure it

1:39:36out eventually. And you know, so like I

1:39:39said, there's nothing about that I think

1:39:41that's completely off limits. But we'll

1:39:42have to understand space and time very

1:39:44differently.

1:39:46And we'll have to understand what you

1:39:48know, you can't even really call it

1:39:49matter or even energy.

1:39:53All of the energy of the universe in a

1:39:54subatomic space, we have no idea what

1:39:57that would behave like,

1:39:59>> you know,

1:40:00>> and what is it existing in?

1:40:02>> Yeah. Well,

1:40:02>> that's that's the what I'm asking is

1:40:04like the environment

1:40:06>> that preceded the big bang. Like what

1:40:08are we talking about where this

1:40:10subatomic thing that contains everything

1:40:13that's in the known universe? What is

1:40:15it? How is it existing?

1:40:19>> And and of course of course I have no

1:40:21answer to it. I mean I mean you're

1:40:22asking the question that I hope someday

1:40:25humanity will have a chance to explore

1:40:27and we'll know more about then I think

1:40:30what will happen is that once we can

1:40:31describe what happened before the big

1:40:33bang there there'll be a whole series of

1:40:34other questions.

1:40:35>> So if it's if the big bang is the wrong

1:40:37way to think about it of a a bang what's

1:40:40the right way to think about it? Yeah,

1:40:42>> the initial expansion.

1:40:45>> I can't think of necessarily a better

1:40:46term. I mean, you you know, the big bang

1:40:48was meant as actually a a criticism,

1:40:50right? It was it was Fred Hy um when

1:40:52people first began back in the 1920s

1:40:55when they discovered the universe was

1:40:57expanding. And this was a big surprise.

1:40:59I mean, famously, Albert Einstein, you

1:41:01didn't think that it was. And then he

1:41:03saw that the evidence all of a sudden

1:41:05with our telescopes, we saw the universe

1:41:06is expanding in every direction. you

1:41:08know, uh, it was actually Fred Hoy that,

1:41:11uh, you know, said at a conference as a

1:41:14way of making fun of this. You know,

1:41:15people were saying, well, maybe

1:41:16everything went back to sort of a common

1:41:18denser, you know, structure. It was

1:41:21actually a uh, it was a Belgian Jesuit

1:41:23uh, um, um, father, a Belgian priest

1:41:26named George Lmetra who came up with

1:41:28this the idea that if the universe was

1:41:29expanding now, if we run time backwards,

1:41:32maybe it all becomes one big, he called

1:41:33it the the the primordial atom. That was

1:41:37uh George Lmetra and uh said

1:41:40>> what year was this?

1:41:41>> Um George Lamemetra. So we would have

1:41:43been talking around about probably

1:41:45sometime in the 1920s. I bet we could

1:41:47probably have some help.

1:41:48>> So a hundred years ago.

1:41:50>> Yeah. 100 years ago. So George Lmetra

1:41:52says if we run time backwards, we we we

1:41:54get this big lump of something,

1:41:56the primordial atom.

1:41:59And then Fred Hoy said, "What you mean

1:42:01the whole universe started with a big

1:42:02bang? you know, really there was this

1:42:04big there was this atom that went bang.

1:42:06So, so, so even the the term the big

1:42:08bang was meant as a criticism. It was

1:42:10meant to be funny.

1:42:11>> It wasn't something that scientists came

1:42:13up with as the best description.

1:42:15>> But what happened then is everybody kind

1:42:16of nodded and said, "Well, yeah, you

1:42:18know, and uh I mean more people should

1:42:22know about George Lmetra, you know, the

1:42:23the Jesuit Belgian uh scientist that

1:42:25that came up with that idea. I think he

1:42:27was a fascinating man. Interestingly

1:42:29enough, even as a Jesuit, um [snorts] he

1:42:32he did not think that this necessarily

1:42:33was a biblical Genesis story. I mean, he

1:42:36was he was approaching this as a

1:42:37scientist. You know, what's the best

1:42:40thing we can say to describe these

1:42:41different times and states of the

1:42:43universe? You know, a lot of my friends

1:42:45are u the the the Catholic Church, the

1:42:47Jesuits have had, you know, an active

1:42:49astronomy program for for a thousand

1:42:50years. And so, uh you know, the Vatican

1:42:52Observatory still has an excellent

1:42:54program. So, but the question you're

1:42:57asking about what came before the big

1:42:59bang. I mean I mean again what happens

1:43:01inside a black hole

1:43:04it it's wonderful that there are these

1:43:06things right over the horizon for from

1:43:08us. We we we know the universe is

1:43:10expanding. What was it like before? What

1:43:12a what a great [snorts] simple elegant

1:43:14question. We have no idea yet.

1:43:17>> Why do we think that it was so small?

1:43:22>> There's some interesting evidence about

1:43:23that. And once again,

1:43:26it's not so much that the entire

1:43:28universe was small. There's compelling

1:43:30evidence that everything we can see was

1:43:33once in a very small volume. Let me let

1:43:35me just sort of say that we're limited

1:43:38by this time factor. You look out as far

1:43:40as you can and eventually you get to the

1:43:43time of the Big Bang. You can't see any

1:43:44further. The universe to us is only as

1:43:47big as light has had time to travel to

1:43:49us. That's not the whole universe. If

1:43:51you're on a galaxy millions of billions

1:43:54of light years away from us, that galaxy

1:43:56sees its own observable universe, you

1:43:58know, I mean, we we basically see in a

1:44:00sphere around us how far we're able to

1:44:02see given the time. A galaxy that we can

1:44:05observe with web the web telescope has

1:44:08its own sphere around it. It's seeing

1:44:09into the universe farther than we can

1:44:11see in some directions.

1:44:14So, but we know the universe isn't just

1:44:17our observable universe. So, like I

1:44:19said, so I mean we we see we're here. We

1:44:22can see as far back as light has had

1:44:24time to travel to us since the big bang,

1:44:26but then there's another galaxy over

1:44:28here and it has its own view. And then

1:44:30there's another one over here that has

1:44:31its own view.

1:44:32>> Jimmy put something up here.

1:44:34>> Yeah. So yeah, I'm not even sure that I

1:44:36mean that that's a a great NASA uh

1:44:39depiction of where this you see as you

1:44:41move toward the left back to the time of

1:44:43the Big Bang, you get to this kind of

1:44:45beautiful kind of rainbow colored area

1:44:47and that's where what they call the the

1:44:48afterglow. That that's the that's the

1:44:50the microwave background radiation about

1:44:53400,000 years after the Big Bang. That's

1:44:55as far as we can see. The universe after

1:44:57that becomes opaque.

1:45:00So that's as far as our observable

1:45:02universe can take us. We know that's not

1:45:04the whole universe. So the whole

1:45:07universe could have been huge before the

1:45:09big bang. It could have been infinite.

1:45:11We don't know how big it was. All we

1:45:13know is our little bit of it. You I mean

1:45:15for the sake of argument, let's say I'm

1:45:16I'm the entire meta universe. You know,

1:45:20there was a little atom of me that

1:45:21expanded to become the known universe we

1:45:24know. But that doesn't mean that that

1:45:25little atom was the whole universe. The

1:45:27universe could be huge. We don't know.

1:45:30Before the Big Bang, it could have

1:45:31already been infinitely large. We have

1:45:33no idea. The only evidence we have is

1:45:36that the stuff we can see was once in a

1:45:38very close area. And that goes back to

1:45:41that that that radiation, that microwave

1:45:43background. The the microwave background

1:45:46has been a wonderful story. It was uh it

1:45:49was discovered back in the 1970s by um

1:45:52two uh scientists from Bell Labs called

1:45:54Pensas and Wilson. And uh they were

1:45:57trying to categorize they they they were

1:45:59they were dealing with Bell Labs. They

1:46:01were trying to deal with microwave

1:46:02signals, microwave communication. And

1:46:04they built a big microwave telescope and

1:46:06they started to to catalog what objects

1:46:08in the sky naturally produce microwaves.

1:46:11The sun produces some other things

1:46:13produce microwaves. This was all for

1:46:14communications.

1:46:16And they discovered that everywhere they

1:46:18looked in the sky, there was this

1:46:20background noise. Very low level, but it

1:46:22was there. Everywhere they looked, it

1:46:24was the same. didn't matter what

1:46:25direction the telescope was pointing.

1:46:27And so what a good scientist would

1:46:29assume is that that's probably a problem

1:46:30with your telescope. If you have

1:46:32background noise in every direction you

1:46:34look, it's probably in your detector.

1:46:36And the the best guess they had was that

1:46:38it was pigeon

1:46:40[laughter]

1:46:41>> So there you go. Pigeon. Look at that.

1:46:42>> Wow.

1:46:43>> So So Sopenzius and Wilson built this,

1:46:45you know, they they they were working

1:46:46with this big microwave telescope and

1:46:49little did I know that pigeon

1:46:51actually gives off microwaves. It does.

1:46:53They um they trapped all the pigeons in

1:46:55the in the microwave telescope. You

1:46:56could actually see a pigeon trap in the

1:46:58Smithsonian where they they did this.

1:47:00They they scraped out all the pigeon

1:47:01and and lo and behold, the signal

1:47:03was still there in every direction you

1:47:06looked. It was exactly the same.

1:47:08Exactly.

1:47:10And and what they had discovered was the

1:47:12afterglow of the big bang. The energy

1:47:14left over from that time when the

1:47:16universe was so hot it was opaque to

1:47:18light. And the crazy thing is it is

1:47:22exactly the same down to fractions of a

1:47:25degree in every direction on the sky.

1:47:27It's sort of like, you know, you look

1:47:29all the way the age of the universe in

1:47:31one direction. It's exactly the same

1:47:33temperature as the age of the universe

1:47:34in that direction. And there shouldn't

1:47:37have been time for those two areas of

1:47:39space to ever get to know each other.

1:47:40There shouldn't have been time. It's

1:47:42like, you know, everything came to the

1:47:44same temperature everywhere you look.

1:47:47Why?

1:47:49It's sort of thinking like if I have if

1:47:50I have a a coffee cup, you know, the

1:47:52coffee cup eventually comes to exactly

1:47:54the same temperature. You know,

1:47:56everything becomes thermally

1:47:57equilibrium. Everything comes to the

1:47:59same temperature. You wouldn't expect

1:48:00your coffee cup to be like, you know,

1:48:02300° on one side and, you know, minus50

1:48:05on the other. [snorts]

1:48:07Somehow the universe had a chance to all

1:48:10come to the same temperature even though

1:48:12those areas of the universe were so far

1:48:14apart they should never have had a

1:48:15chance to touch each other. And that

1:48:17became part of the thinking that maybe

1:48:19at one point when the universe was that

1:48:21large things were much smaller. You know

1:48:23the universe did have a chance to come

1:48:25to this exact same temperature all over.

1:48:28Boy, I hope I I see by your expression I

1:48:30should do a better job of explaining

1:48:31this.

1:48:31>> No, you're doing a great job. It's just

1:48:33absolutely fascinating. My expression is

1:48:34just perplexed.

1:48:35>> Yeah. Well, no. So, so this is one of

1:48:37the best proofs that things were small.

1:48:40That you look back to this microwave

1:48:42background radiation and we're talking

1:48:44fractions and fractions of a degree. The

1:48:47um uh the first NASA satellite that

1:48:49observed it was called Kobe and then

1:48:51there the cosmic microwave explorer and

1:48:53then there was a new one uh in the 1990s

1:48:56called WMAC, the Wilkinson microwave

1:48:59antisotropy probe. Oh yes, good. Uh and

1:49:02um they they measured this, you know,

1:49:04down to to hundreds of thousands of a

1:49:06degree, right? I mean, they measured it

1:49:07to tiny little amounts. And uh the

1:49:10incredible thing was that it was it was

1:49:12almost exactly the same temperature, but

1:49:14there were these beautiful large I mean

1:49:18there were variations in the temperature

1:49:20and the variation in the temperatures

1:49:22corresponded to sound waves propagating

1:49:24across the whole universe at that time.

1:49:27It's it's it's deep. It's wonderful. I I

1:49:30highly recommend you read about this.

1:49:32Um, you know, we have this signal that

1:49:34comes back from basically the first

1:49:37moment the universe became transparent

1:49:38to light. It was so dense it was opaque

1:49:41beforehand. There was a moment light

1:49:44could finally freely fly through the

1:49:46universe. And and we found that we found

1:49:49that signal. It goes back to a time

1:49:51about a 100,000 years after 400,000

1:49:54years after the Big Bang. And it is

1:49:56breathtaking in its profound nature. You

1:49:59can actually see sound waves go across

1:50:01the whole universe.

1:50:02>> Wow.

1:50:03>> Yeah.

1:50:04>> Wow. Now, when we think of the Big Bang,

1:50:07we think of it as almost being an

1:50:08instantaneous event.

1:50:11>> Well, yeah. I I mean, again, you as an

1:50:14experimental scientist,

1:50:17there are all these wonderful theories

1:50:18about about what things happened like a

1:50:20a millionth of a second and a billionth

1:50:22of a second after. And I I'm going to

1:50:24I'm going to take all that with a grain

1:50:25of salt. I don't think we understand it

1:50:28well enough to be all that confident

1:50:30about that. There there's a great book

1:50:32called the first three minutes which has

1:50:34been around since the oh gez probably

1:50:36since the 1970s maybe even longer and it

1:50:39sort of outlines how we think that you

1:50:40know the universe in the first three

1:50:42minutes basically went from the big bang

1:50:44to just sort of all the hydrogen that

1:50:45and helium that we have and in the first

1:50:48three minutes it it pretty much

1:50:50everything was done. The the whole sort

1:50:52of process of the big bang was done in

1:50:54in that in those first three minutes.

1:50:55the the the actual big bang itself goes

1:50:58back to something called the plank epoch

1:50:59which you see there 10 to the minus 33rd

1:51:02seconds 10 to the minus 43rd seconds. So

1:51:05take a decimal point draw 42 zeros and

1:51:08then a and then a 43 [laughter]

1:51:10>> singularity infinite density and

1:51:12temperature quantum gravity dominates

1:51:15forces unified.

1:51:16>> Absolutely. I again [laughter] again big

1:51:18big chunk of salt there. Yeah. I mean so

1:51:20so so this is the this is not

1:51:24this is the the best model given our

1:51:27understanding of modern physics. Um do I

1:51:30think this is is is right literally? No.

1:51:32I think we've got a lot to understand

1:51:34about how gravity works in high density

1:51:37situations. Um when when gravity and

1:51:40quantum mechanics come together, those

1:51:42two theories, they they don't work well

1:51:43together. And in order to understand how

1:51:46things were like right before the big

1:51:47bang or even right after, I think you

1:51:49need to understand that a lot better. I

1:51:51mean, all this stuff that we think may

1:51:53be dark matter and dark energy, none of

1:51:55that is in the current theory of how the

1:51:57Big Bang started, we don't know if it's

1:51:59important or not. That's a good first

1:52:02step. You have to you have to take your

1:52:04current understanding of physics and

1:52:06take it as far as you can.

1:52:08But in the case of what happened right

1:52:10at the instant of the Big Bang, I don't

1:52:11think we're there yet. I think we need a

1:52:13better understanding of what happens

1:52:15when you have that amount of density in

1:52:17such an entire space. It's like it's

1:52:18like it's like the interior of a black

1:52:20hole. We we we don't have the physics to

1:52:22describe high density high gravity

1:52:24conditions.

1:52:25>> Insane high density.

1:52:26>> Oh yeah. Yeah.

1:52:27>> I mean to the point where you you can't

1:52:30even

1:52:30>> take the known universe and put it

1:52:32inside the you know nucleus of an atom.

1:52:33Yeah. We we don't got that yet.

1:52:35[laughter]

1:52:36>> And what is it in?

1:52:38>> And are there others? You know I mean

1:52:40some of the the best ideas about the big

1:52:42bang is that the expansion never stops.

1:52:44It kind of pops off universes like you

1:52:46said almost fractally all the time.

1:52:48That's the uh the idea of uh um Ellen

1:52:52Guth. That's the idea of of

1:52:55Alen Guth's idea. Well, that's it's not

1:52:57the expanding universe. I'll come up

1:52:59with it later. But but back in the

1:53:011970s, uh a man at MIT, Alan Guth, uh

1:53:04had his theory of how this expansion

1:53:06might might never stop. So, um

1:53:11we don't know that. That that may

1:53:13absolutely There you go. Inflation.

1:53:15Inflationary. Sorry, that was a complete

1:53:16mental fart. I I I know the inflationary

1:53:19universe, but uh um again, I think all

1:53:22of this is a necessary first grasp using

1:53:25our current understanding of physics. I

1:53:28don't think we understand how the big

1:53:29bang went off yet. I think we need a

1:53:31ways to go.

1:53:32>> Well, it's got to be so fascinating to

1:53:33you to know so much and yet still have

1:53:38so many things that we have no idea. You

1:53:41know that that's I think you you've just

1:53:43put hit you just hit it on the head

1:53:45about one of the most beautiful and one

1:53:48of the most frustrating and even scary

1:53:50things about being a scientist. You you

1:53:52have to be honest about what you don't

1:53:55know. I mean you you have to say we made

1:53:58this measurement and it's real. You we

1:54:01we managed to see the in the the

1:54:03event horizon of a black hole. We caught

1:54:05the same wavelength of light over you

1:54:06know thousands of miles. You you can say

1:54:10what's real and then you can say these

1:54:12are the things we do not know

1:54:15and they are major you know how did the

1:54:18universe begin you know what happens

1:54:21inside a black hole what happens inside

1:54:23a neutron star

1:54:25we don't have the the ability yet to

1:54:28know and it's it's hard for humans to

1:54:31stop there and I mean of course we make

1:54:33better experiments you find a better

1:54:35theory of physics but for the moment you

1:54:37need to sit with that uncertainty.

1:54:40There is no one who knows what happened.

1:54:43And I there there are so many things in

1:54:45our life that I've had to confront where

1:54:48you have to become comfortable with

1:54:51stopping there at least for now. You

1:54:53know, I do not understand this. I do not

1:54:56have the answer to this and I don't

1:54:57think anybody does.

1:54:59And I I I think we'd actually benefit a

1:55:02lot more in humility and joy and maybe

1:55:05even compassion with each other, you

1:55:07know, if we can respect that stop and

1:55:10say, you know, I I I you you may not

1:55:12have the same answer as to what comes

1:55:14next about life or death or the

1:55:16beginning of the universe or the inside

1:55:18of a black hole. We can respect each

1:55:19other.

1:55:21To me, I find a good a good discipline

1:55:24and the humility to stop and say, "I

1:55:26don't know." Well, it's very important

1:55:29because otherwise we're not going to

1:55:30believe you with stuff that you do know.

1:55:32There has to be some things that you

1:55:34can't know.

1:55:34>> It has to be measurable,

1:55:36>> especially in the current state of what

1:55:37we were able to measure right now.

1:55:39>> Science science is limited deliberately

1:55:41and then I think this is beautiful. I

1:55:43think people don't understand

1:55:45there are things that are outside at

1:55:47least for now the realm of measurement

1:55:49and that doesn't mean they're not real.

1:55:51As a scientist, I cannot say that there

1:55:53aren't, you know, ghosts or, you know,

1:55:56inside a black hole or, you know, or or,

1:55:58you know, alien visitations or or

1:56:00whatever. There there are all kinds of

1:56:02things that are wonderful to think

1:56:03about.

1:56:05You know, what can you do a consistent

1:56:08experiment on that people all around the

1:56:10world could do the same experiment and

1:56:12get the same result? That's science and

1:56:14it's limited.

1:56:16You know, I I I've had to talk to so

1:56:17many people that called into NASA saying

1:56:19they had profound experiences with uh

1:56:22time travel or

1:56:23>> You had to talk to time travelers.

1:56:24>> Oh, yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Or people would

1:56:27call in.

1:56:27>> Was there a time traveler hotline like

1:56:28Art Bell?

1:56:29>> They they would often forward the calls

1:56:31to me and why you

1:56:32>> um Well, I I mean I was I was doing

1:56:34communications at NASA

1:56:36>> and I think they just didn't know what

1:56:37to do with these people and and I um I

1:56:39think they they they knew and I I I

1:56:42pride myself on this. I I try to be

1:56:43kind. I try to lead with compassion and

1:56:46I would listen to people's stories about

1:56:48you know I I I was I traveled in time or

1:56:50or or I was abducted by an alien or or

1:56:52many things and you know and I I would

1:56:54listen to them. I think that what they

1:56:56mainly wanted to do was find somebody to

1:56:58listen. You know I I would say to them

1:57:01you know you have had a profound

1:57:02experience you have experienced

1:57:04something that I mean I hope you you use

1:57:06you as a gift.

1:57:08I would say that there's not much as a

1:57:10scientist that I can do with a um an an

1:57:14individual experience. You know, I can't

1:57:16do an experiment on it. I can't have my

1:57:18colleagues all over the world do the

1:57:20same experiment about what you you know,

1:57:22you you you did you have a spiritual

1:57:25experience? Did you have a profound

1:57:27feeling of oneness? I mean,

1:57:30it's not that these aren't real.

1:57:33Science has to be limited because just

1:57:37like what you said, how can you trust

1:57:38it, right? How can you trust people are

1:57:40saying I mean why are these people at

1:57:42NASA allowed to have telescopes and do

1:57:44all this stuff? I mean I mean what what

1:57:46makes this worthwhile?

1:57:49You have to say there's a limitation.

1:57:51You know what do we have clear evidence

1:57:53on that everyone could do the same

1:57:55experiment and get a similar result?

1:57:59That doesn't mean other things aren't

1:58:00real. M

1:58:02>> it means that science is limited to what

1:58:05is um reproducible, consistently

1:58:09reproducible

1:58:12and what a human experiences could be

1:58:15profound and real but at the moment not

1:58:18in the realm of science.

1:58:20>> So you're not discounting the

1:58:22possibility of people having profound

1:58:24experiences but there's really no way to

1:58:26measure it

1:58:28>> at the moment. No. at the moment.

1:58:29>> I mean, may maybe when we understand the

1:58:31brain better. Um, you know, maybe when

1:58:34if AIs are sharing minds, you know, I

1:58:37mean, we're talking, you know,

1:58:38incredible fun conjecture here. At at

1:58:42the moment, we're limited with the tools

1:58:43of what is reproducible,

1:58:45you know, I mean, if you if you shoot if

1:58:47you observe in one direction with your

1:58:49telescope for a certain amount of time

1:58:50at a certain wavelength of light, you

1:58:52should see pretty much the same thing.

1:58:54you know, whoever does the experiment,

1:58:56you know, if you're doing experiment

1:58:58with atoms or quantum mechanics or, you

1:59:00know, whatever, it has to be

1:59:01reproducible.

1:59:04That that that doesn't mean that

1:59:05profound things that are real are not

1:59:08there. They're just not in the realm of

1:59:09science right now.

1:59:11When you're communicating with people

1:59:13that supposedly have had experiences

1:59:15with intelligent life from somewhere

1:59:17else

1:59:18>> and you spend so much time looking up at

1:59:21space, like how much time and how much

1:59:24effort do you spend even considering

1:59:27that possibility of life somewhere else

1:59:29or of whether or not these people have

1:59:31actually experienced visitation or

1:59:34whether or not it's some sort of mental

1:59:35illness or whether there's some kind of

1:59:37an experience that's available to

1:59:39people. occasionally here that defies

1:59:43our understanding of what is measurable

1:59:46and what what's reproducible that

1:59:49there's there's something else out

1:59:51there.

1:59:53>> I I I think that's a wonderful question

1:59:55and I think this this may gives you give

1:59:57you a little bit of a snapshot of of the

1:59:59culture of science and and a a mind of a

2:00:01scientist because it's it's an odd

2:00:03little tight rope to walk. I'm I'm very

2:00:05proud of it actually. I think it's kind

2:00:07of beautiful.

2:00:09Um, all of us to a person at NASA thinks

2:00:13that there must be life out there. The

2:00:15idea that there's only life on the Earth

2:00:17seems untenable. I mean, not only do you

2:00:19see the, you know, the billions of stars

2:00:21in our own galaxy, but we see billions

2:00:23of galaxies. How How could it just be

2:00:25us? How could it? I We're all science

2:00:28fiction fans. We all love the idea of

2:00:31there being life out there. Um, I always

2:00:34keep a bottle of uh champagne chilling.

2:00:36I have for decades now. Uh in the hopes

2:00:38that someday we'll have a clear evidence

2:00:40of life outside the earth. You know,

2:00:42we'll have a a signal that we

2:00:43>> What are you willing to pop the

2:00:44champagne for? Is it molecules? Is it

2:00:48>> bacteria? Well, definitely bacteria. I I

2:00:51I uh I I I definitely pawn scum, some

2:00:54little microbe on Mars. You got it. That

2:00:56champagne is coming out. And at the same

2:00:58time there are the fantastic scientists

2:01:00of SETI you know the search for

2:01:02extraterrestrial intelligence who are

2:01:03scanning the skies looking for

2:01:04mathematical signals from civilizations.

2:01:07Um the the question of of for me comes

2:01:11down to again what is a reproducible

2:01:13observation

2:01:15and with the advent I mean the recent

2:01:17release of these videos from uh fighter

2:01:20jets and all of that I think an

2:01:22interesting thing is that scientists at

2:01:24NASA you know in the universities I mean

2:01:27we're not getting together over a beer

2:01:28and looking at these videos and really

2:01:30getting excited it it it's not enough

2:01:32yet you know we're seeing these things

2:01:35we we can't explain

2:01:37But we're trained as skeptical

2:01:39scientists to sort of stop there. Okay,

2:01:41we can't explain this

2:01:44that that that next step that this is an

2:01:46alien. We're we're not willing to go

2:01:49yet. We we need more evidence than that.

2:01:52But as I said, that's that's a

2:01:56deliberate training of a scientist is

2:01:58that skeptical stop.

2:02:00the the people who have had experiences

2:02:03and and no, I'm not willing to dismiss

2:02:05them as being mentally ill necessarily.

2:02:09I honestly don't know what it is they

2:02:11experienced. It is not within It is

2:02:13certainly within my realm of possibility

2:02:16that what they're describing actually

2:02:17happened. Um I I cannot say that that's

2:02:21impossible. what what I what I as a

2:02:24skeptical scientist I'm I'm stopped by I

2:02:26I I would need more evidence than an

2:02:28individual experience.

2:02:30You know I this happens in many aspects

2:02:32of life. It's not just um the visitation

2:02:35of extraterrestrials. You know I have um

2:02:38people that are are are extremely

2:02:40trustworthy who would never lie who have

2:02:44had profound spiritual experiences. you

2:02:46know, they have experiences of an

2:02:48afterlife and of people living on after

2:02:50death and of being able to communicate

2:02:52with people and um that is not part of

2:02:55my experience.

2:02:57But these people are completely 100%

2:03:00trustworthy.

2:03:03I have to live in this universe where I

2:03:05I don't get to say what's real and

2:03:08what's not. These trustworthy people

2:03:11have experienced something profound and

2:03:13it may be real. It may be that they've

2:03:16done that they've they've seen people

2:03:17after they've died or they've seen, you

2:03:20know, visitors from other planets. Um,

2:03:23that gives me joy. I sure hope we live

2:03:26in a larger reality that I'm aware of.

2:03:29As a scientist, I pull back and say,

2:03:32"It's not my experience. It's not

2:03:34something I can measure yet." And so, I

2:03:36I live in this

2:03:40hope that someday we'll have more proof.

2:03:43I live in this hope that someday

2:03:44there'll be a signal we know is

2:03:45artificial. We see something we can't

2:03:48explain otherwise. We are visited

2:03:49clearly.

2:03:51You know, I I I

2:03:56live in this sort of skeptical

2:03:57tightroppe with hope that someday things

2:04:00will become more clear.

2:04:01>> That's a great place to be. [laughter] I

2:04:02love that.

2:04:03>> I actually like it. I to me it it it it

2:04:06I think humility and compassion,

2:04:09>> you know, I think we could the whole the

2:04:12world could use a lot more of that just

2:04:14for sure.

2:04:14>> Yeah. Just just I mean reserve judgment.

2:04:17Think about how different a human

2:04:19experience is. We don't understand what

2:04:21consciousness is. We don't understand

2:04:22how the human brain works. You know, is

2:04:24it possible somebody had a different

2:04:26experience of time? Maybe it is. You

2:04:29know, in science, what can we measure is

2:04:32powerful. We we do things we should not

2:04:35be able to do, like catch waves of space

2:04:37and time, see light and space curve

2:04:40around a neutron star. And that's real.

2:04:43That's a measurement. Stick a pin in it,

2:04:44it's done. And leave humility and

2:04:48compassion for the experience of other

2:04:49humans.

2:04:50>> How much are we limited by our senses?

2:04:55>> Oh, yeah. I mean I mean is is is space

2:04:58and time a construct of our our brains

2:05:00actually. Seriously. I mean not just I

2:05:02mean for a while now ever since the late

2:05:041700s we've known that there is light

2:05:06that our eyes don't detect.

2:05:08Mind-blowing. The human eye only detects

2:05:11a tiny amount of light that exists in

2:05:12the universe.

2:05:14Colors of light you know that our eye

2:05:16just doesn't detect at all are real. You

2:05:19know they were some of the first

2:05:21measurement was William Hershel back in

2:05:22the late 1700s. He he discovered

2:05:24infrared radiation.

2:05:27Is it even deeper than that? You know, I

2:05:30mean, are there, as I said, you know,

2:05:31friends who have experiences with with

2:05:33with with people who are dead? Are there

2:05:36people that are sensitive to that and

2:05:38other brains are not? Maybe. You know,

2:05:41is it is it possible that people have

2:05:43very different experiences of reality? I

2:05:46mean, I've um I I I will admit I I'm a

2:05:48chicken. I' I've never uh I've never

2:05:50actually done any hallucinogenic uh

2:05:51drugs. I have been tempted because I do

2:05:54sometimes wonder if under that sort of

2:05:57influence the filters of our brain are

2:05:59different. I mean are could you actually

2:06:00have an experience of something that

2:06:02could be real because your filters how

2:06:04we perceive space and time in the

2:06:06universe are changed by the drug. I I

2:06:09like I said I'm just I'm too much of a

2:06:10chicken but I've always been curious

2:06:11about that. You know is it possible

2:06:14different people have seriously

2:06:15different ways of experiencing the

2:06:17universe? Yeah. Yeah. Maybe

2:06:20>> what what about it makes you a chicken?

2:06:25>> I'm not sure I trust an unleashed mind.

2:06:28In my case, I have um I think there

2:06:31there are people who suffer or or are

2:06:32gifted um by very extreme dreams. I'm

2:06:35one of them. I'm often exhausted by my

2:06:38dreams in the morning. Actually, I had a

2:06:40night last night. I I I was the the

2:06:41dreams were a lot to recover from. And

2:06:45um I'm a little worried. I I I have I

2:06:48some of sometimes my dreams are

2:06:49wonderful and sometimes they are

2:06:51horrible and I remember them forever.

2:06:53There are things I really would like to

2:06:55erase that I' I've dreamt about

2:06:58I'm not real confident in letting my

2:07:02mind be unfettered.

2:07:05>> Yeah. [laughter]

2:07:08>> Why do you think it it's unfettered?

2:07:11What why do what about uh a psychedelic

2:07:14excuse [clears throat] me a psychedelic

2:07:15experience makes you uh consider it as

2:07:18an unfettered mind

2:07:20>> I guess I mean that may be sort of the

2:07:22propaganda of the you good and bad trips

2:07:24right people have you know people

2:07:25sometimes have wonderful experiences and

2:07:27sometimes very terrible ones

2:07:28>> do you know why though

2:07:29>> no

2:07:30>> it's control you're trying to control it

2:07:32for the most part most people that

2:07:34describe bad trips it's they're trying

2:07:36to resist it

2:07:38>> because um you you're flooded with

2:07:40anxiety and fear and the unknown and it

2:07:42seems very strange like bizarre beyond

2:07:46beyond reality. But one of the craziest

2:07:48things about the most um prevalent

2:07:52psychedelic is that the mind produces it

2:07:55which is dimethylryptamine. The brain

2:07:57produces it. It's produced in the liver

2:07:58and the lungs is very very weird. The

2:08:01most potent psychedelic known to man is

2:08:03actually made by the human body.

2:08:04>> Fascinating.

2:08:05>> It's one of the weirdest ones too

2:08:06because your body brings it back to

2:08:08baseline very quickly. It's a very quick

2:08:10experience. It's like 15 minutes. And

2:08:12they think part of the reason why your

2:08:15body processes it so fast is because

2:08:17it's indogenous. It's it's so common to

2:08:19the human body that your body gets this

2:08:21big flood of it. It's like, "Oh, I know

2:08:22what to do with this." And it brings you

2:08:24back to baseline very very quickly.

2:08:26>> The weirdest part about that experience

2:08:28is that it feels way more real than

2:08:30reality itself. And that's what

2:08:32everybody describes. So you might be

2:08:35correct in that what these things may be

2:08:37able to do, especially something that

2:08:39the the actual body, the human body

2:08:41produces on its own, that you might be

2:08:45able to experience things that are there

2:08:47all the time, but you just lack the

2:08:51ability to interface with them.

2:08:53>> Yeah.

2:08:53>> Because there's some sort of a a

2:08:55chemical gateway that's opened by these

2:08:57things.

2:08:58>> I can entirely believe that. I mean I

2:09:00mean again I mean stepping a little bit

2:09:02away from science into conjecture um

2:09:04that makes perfect sense to me. I mean

2:09:07physics shows us that time and space are

2:09:10not the way we perceive them. We know

2:09:12that we don't know what they are but we

2:09:15know they're not a simple flow and you

2:09:18know space is just nothing. I mean, we

2:09:19we know space and time can bend and

2:09:22change and

2:09:23>> and so the idea that our brain filters

2:09:26this somehow

2:09:29entirely possible and that people may

2:09:31have slightly different filters. I mean

2:09:33I I think

2:09:33>> well I always wondered that about

2:09:34schizophrenics

2:09:35>> like what are they experiencing? Are

2:09:37they in a constant dream state? Like

2:09:39really profoundly schizophrenic people

2:09:42that are just they're having voices and

2:09:43communication like

2:09:45>> what what a I mean I would I don't want

2:09:47to do it but could you imagine if you

2:09:49got some guy ranting and raving on the

2:09:51street corner if you say just let me in

2:09:52there for 5 seconds. Give me five

2:09:54seconds. What is what is reality like to

2:09:56this guy and what's wrong what's wrong

2:09:59with his interface? What is happening

2:10:01with him that's he's seeing things that

2:10:04none of us see. He's experiencing things

2:10:06that none of us experience, but he's

2:10:08doing it all day long constantly. He

2:10:10like lives in a crazy fantasy world.

2:10:13>> Well, I I may be interested. I mean,

2:10:14I've also, you know, I mean, not just

2:10:16the experience of physics, you know, and

2:10:18people have talked about being able to

2:10:19see colors and sorry, see sounds and

2:10:22hear colors. I think that would be

2:10:23fascinating. But a lot of people have

2:10:25talked to me as well about the benefits

2:10:26for grief. And, you know, that that's

2:10:29something that, you know, I'm I've just

2:10:30I got knocked on my ass by grief. I

2:10:32still am. you know, I'm trying to figure

2:10:34out, you know, you know, how how you

2:10:36sort of, you know, get beyond that. And

2:10:38I' I've heard as well that uh that

2:10:40psychedelic drugs can be a treatment for

2:10:42that.

2:10:43>> Yeah. It's a lot of it is also for

2:10:45people that have end of life anxiety,

2:10:47people that are dying from cancer,

2:10:48particularly psilocybin for some reason

2:10:51>> has a profound effect on people like

2:10:53experiencing it, letting it go. I

2:10:55remember do you remember that show

2:10:57Dallas?

2:10:58>> Yeah.

2:10:59>> Remember [laughter]

2:11:01Larry Hagman? Is that what his name was?

2:11:03Yeah. So, uh, he was on CNN once and he

2:11:07was talking about life and death and he

2:11:09said that he had an experience on LSD

2:11:12that completely released him from his

2:11:15fear of death and it was the most

2:11:17bizarre CNN interview ever.

2:11:19>> Sounds fantastic.

2:11:20>> Yeah, I know. But like there like I

2:11:22don't think they expected J.R. Ewing to

2:11:24say this, you know, the guy from Dallas

2:11:26who was like this bad guy. Here it is.

2:11:28>> Talking to Joy Behar on headline news.

2:11:30It's very I mean

2:11:31>> Yeah. Oh, it's headline. Is that CNN?

2:11:33>> Except it's some very similar own by the

2:11:36same.

2:11:36>> I I would like that. I would like to

2:11:37lose my fear of death.

2:11:38>> Listen what he says.

2:11:39>> Crosby Stills and Nash turned you on to

2:11:41LSD. Um, what was that like? Tell me a

2:11:44little about that.

2:11:47>> Oh, how much time we got? [laughter]

2:11:50>> 30 about a minute. But you can do a lot

2:11:53in a minute.

2:11:53>> A minute.

2:11:54>> Yeah.

2:11:55>> Okay. Uh, it took the fear of death

2:11:57away.

2:11:58>> Really?

2:12:00That's a great answer. That's a big

2:12:02That's a great answer.

2:12:03>> But did it hold?

2:12:05>> Yeah.

2:12:06>> Do you have to keep taking it to not be

2:12:07scared? No. Did it hold the fear? Did

2:12:10the lack of fear of the the losing?

2:12:12>> Oh, yeah. Oh, sure. Absolutely. Once

2:12:14you've lost the fear of death, it

2:12:16doesn't matter.

2:12:16>> How did it What What happened to you?

2:12:18How did that manifest?

2:12:22>> Oh my dear. Um, have you heard of the

2:12:24white light? Have you ever heard of

2:12:26that?

2:12:26>> Only when I'm GOING INTO JERSEY.

2:12:29>> [laughter]

2:12:32>> WELL, I went

2:12:34I went into this this this place that

2:12:37was the white light that where

2:12:38everything's okay.

2:12:40>> Well, that is I think that's worth

2:12:44>> Yeah.

2:12:44>> And I think I think it ought to be

2:12:46mandatory that all our politicians

2:12:47should do it at least once. [laughter]

2:12:50>> That now that's a good suggestion. You

2:12:52know, I

2:12:52>> I think Joy should do it, too. Quit the

2:12:54view. [laughter]

2:12:56Can you imagine being in an interview

2:12:57and somebody's like, "You got 30

2:12:58seconds. Tell me about the most profound

2:13:00experience you've ever had."

2:13:01>> Yeah, that's the most ridiculous aspect

2:13:02of those shows is that they're

2:13:04constricted by time.

2:13:05>> I I like that idea though. And I like I

2:13:07like the idea that it it could help us

2:13:08through things like that. I I I I really

2:13:10do. I mean, I I know uh psilocybin was

2:13:12legal in uh Washington DC when I was

2:13:14living near Washington DC

2:13:16>> when my my husband died. And you know, I

2:13:18I really wanted to I [snorts] really

2:13:21wish somebody could have made him be

2:13:22happier, you know. I was like, should I

2:13:24just go get some, you know, and I I

2:13:26never I I didn't, but I thought it

2:13:27should be a therapy, an optional

2:13:29therapy.

2:13:30>> Yeah.

2:13:30>> You know, that that that could be

2:13:31something that that you give people to

2:13:33help them through that.

2:13:34>> Well, you know, we are very uh

2:13:37restricted by the propaganda that made

2:13:40all that stuff illegal in the first

2:13:42place, unfortunately. And uh you know,

2:13:45I've recently went to the White House to

2:13:47help make these things available for

2:13:49veterans and for first responders and

2:13:52people dealing with traumatic

2:13:53experiences. Um because the only reason

2:13:56why they're illegal was because of the

2:13:58Nixon administration, the Controlled

2:14:00Substances Act of 1970. And what they

2:14:03did was they were targeting the civil

2:14:05rights movement and the anti-war

2:14:06movement. And they knew that these

2:14:08people were taking these kind of drugs

2:14:09and this is part of the fear of like the

2:14:11hippie movement and all these people and

2:14:13so they just made all these things

2:14:15schedule one meaning they had no

2:14:16medicinal use whatsoever. Highly

2:14:18addictive, very dangerous. And it's not

2:14:20true. It's not true. I mean you you

2:14:23can't eat enough mushrooms to die. It's

2:14:24not even possible. I mean you'd have to

2:14:27eat pounds of it and most people are

2:14:29going to live even then. Like it's not

2:14:33what they think it is. It's not what

2:14:35they said it was. And they inundated our

2:14:38society with this propaganda that's

2:14:40taken more than 50 years for people to

2:14:42escape. It it confused the out of

2:14:45everybody about what these things really

2:14:46are. And that's why you have this fear

2:14:48of the unfettered mind. I don't think

2:14:51you should have that fear.

2:14:52>> I I I like that idea. I

2:14:54>> You also could take a micro dose. If you

2:14:56found someone who could get you some,

2:14:58take a micro dose and I think you'd

2:14:59enjoy it profoundly and it wouldn't

2:15:01freak you out at all. A micro dose is

2:15:03very it's like a sub psychedelic

2:15:06threshold dose where you just feel

2:15:08better. You just feel wonderful. You

2:15:11like feel nicer. You feel like you

2:15:14better spatial awareness which is weird.

2:15:16Better edge detection. It's very str

2:15:18like measurable. Like they did these

2:15:20studies, I think it was in the 1960s

2:15:22where they gave people psilocybin and

2:15:24then they had a control group and the

2:15:26people that were on psilocybin were able

2:15:28to detect when parallel lines varied

2:15:31quicker than the people that were not on

2:15:33psilocybin. So they had these parallel

2:15:35lines and they slightly deviated. The

2:15:37people on psilocybin were able to detect

2:15:38it much quicker.

2:15:40>> Yeah.

2:15:40>> Which is weird.

2:15:41>> Well, again I I I mean to me that makes

2:15:43sense. I mean, you know, I I can imagine

2:15:45that, you know, if the brain is

2:15:46stimulated in certain ways, it would act

2:15:48more efficiently. It could, you know,

2:15:49Sure. I that that

2:15:52works with me. Yeah.

2:15:53>> Well, the weirdest thing about it is

2:15:54that when they do brain scans of people

2:15:56on psilocybin, it doesn't show a

2:15:57stimulated brain.

2:15:58>> All right.

2:15:58>> It shows a quiet brain.

2:16:00>> We understand so little about the brain.

2:16:03I had a friend uh who was a

2:16:04neuroscientist at Caltech. And you know,

2:16:06one of the things he he really I I loved

2:16:08this quotation. He said that we always

2:16:10compare the brain historically to sort

2:16:12of what the height of our technology is.

2:16:14You know the Romans thought of it as

2:16:16sort of a series of fluid aqueducts and

2:16:18you know and then in in the 18th century

2:16:20you had the idea of gears cogs cognition

2:16:22right where we get that word from.

2:16:24>> Wow.

2:16:24>> And you know clockwork was their highest

2:16:26form of technology and then we compare

2:16:28it to a computer and it's probably about

2:16:31as much of a computer as it is a clock

2:16:33right I mean we we do not understand yet

2:16:35how this works. Yeah,

2:16:37>> we we have no idea what the mechanism of

2:16:39memory, you know, you know, or I mean,

2:16:41or how why do we perceive space and time

2:16:44the way we do,

2:16:45>> right?

2:16:45>> If if the universe really does exist in

2:16:47a huge infinite now, how come we think

2:16:50one event causes another? How come we

2:16:52think time progresses? You know, these

2:16:54are fascinating questions about, you

2:16:56know, our lack of understanding of what

2:16:58the brain is at all, how it works. You

2:17:01know, I'm I'm sure when we when we

2:17:04understand quantum computing better,

2:17:05we'll probably say it's a quantum

2:17:06computer. I mean, however however

2:17:09technology progresses, we're always

2:17:11comparing it to the height of our

2:17:12current technology.

2:17:14>> Yeah. And when we interface with

2:17:17technology, does that give us a better

2:17:19understanding of how we fit into this

2:17:22thing or do we just have more

2:17:24capability? And are we still like

2:17:27burdened with the same questions just

2:17:30you know is where's that quote I think

2:17:31was Dennis McKenna's quote of uh the

2:17:35bonfire uh once the bonfire of

2:17:38information is lit it exposes more

2:17:41surface area of ignorance

2:17:43>> that the brighter the fire gets the more

2:17:45you realize oh there's so much I don't

2:17:46know

2:17:47>> yet [laughter]

2:17:50maybe maybe we would think that

2:17:51interfacing with this technology and

2:17:53having all the information that every

2:17:55human being that's ever

2:17:56lived has. It's still you just go

2:17:58there's not enough. There's no way.

2:18:00>> Yeah. Well, and that's that's the idea.

2:18:02People sort of think about this. Is

2:18:03there an ultimate question? Like people

2:18:05say, "What happened before the Big

2:18:06Bang?" And I think someday we will

2:18:07figure that out and then there'll be

2:18:08just a whole other bunch of questions. I

2:18:10mean, I I I don't think there's any end.

2:18:13You know, I uh I I I don't I don't see

2:18:15why there really should be. I I I we

2:18:18don't think we'll ever figure it all out

2:18:20is what I'm saying.

2:18:21>> Yeah. Well, that's part of the fun of

2:18:23it, though, right?

2:18:25Yeah.

2:18:25>> Part of the most amazing

2:18:28experiences that a person can have

2:18:30trying to understand the universe is

2:18:32that there's no answers. There's you you

2:18:34get to a certain point where like

2:18:36your guess is as good as anybody's like

2:18:38nobody knows.

2:18:39>> Yeah.

2:18:40>> That's what's nuts. That's what's nuts

2:18:42is that as much I mean you explaining

2:18:44how they were able to get an image of a

2:18:47black hole now just imagine how crazy

2:18:51that would sound to someone just a

2:18:53hundred years ago or 200 years ago

2:18:56>> or [laughter]

2:18:57to me right now it sounds insane and and

2:18:59then to imagine that our ability to

2:19:03detect things could get many many many

2:19:06many layers better

2:19:08>> and still we would be like there's still

2:19:10some that's just no way.

2:19:14>> Yeah, that the way that you detect black

2:19:15holes and he pulled up a picture of this

2:19:17uh uh telescope in Chile, the very large

2:19:20telescope, VLT. Again, never let

2:19:21astronomers name anything. VT, the very

2:19:23large telescope. And then off to the

2:19:25side there, they're currently they're

2:19:26currently building the ELT, which is the

2:19:29extremely large telescope.

2:19:31>> No kidding. But the uh this this

2:19:33technique called interpherometry where

2:19:35you basically catch the same wavefront

2:19:37of light in several detectors and then

2:19:40you you bring that light all together

2:19:41and you have it interfere with itself.

2:19:44It's um it's one of these things that I

2:19:46always think should people should be a

2:19:47little bit more um in a in a in a good

2:19:50way kind of scared about because it it's

2:19:52another thing that really chips at our

2:19:53idea of reality because I mean honestly

2:19:56what you're doing to some extent is

2:19:58you're catching the same particle of

2:20:00light in many different telescopes at

2:20:02once. Literally you're catching the same

2:20:05photon in many different locations at

2:20:07once. And when you can measure

2:20:10accurately, that accurately, a

2:20:12wavelength of light traveling at the

2:20:13speed of light, when you're measuring

2:20:15down to the accuracy of the quantum

2:20:17world, where quantum mechanics becomes

2:20:19the prevalent uh description of reality,

2:20:22the universe just doesn't care that

2:20:24these are different space points that

2:20:26the photon was in. It it it it's let me

2:20:29put it this way. It it is it is really

2:20:32kind of true that when you do this

2:20:33experiment, the same particle of light

2:20:35is measured in eight different places at

2:20:36once simultaneously. It's it was in

2:20:39eight different telescopes. You play all

2:20:41that together, you get a measurement.

2:20:44Some people interpret that, not all of

2:20:46them, but some people interpret that as

2:20:48a direct consequence of multiple worlds

2:20:50that you're you're there were eight

2:20:51different versions of reality where the

2:20:53photon was in each of these telescopes.

2:20:55You're sort of dovetailing them together

2:20:56to make an observation.

2:20:59interpherometry

2:21:00depending on how you interpret it. There

2:21:02are many interpherometrists that don't

2:21:04interpret it that way. They they

2:21:06interpret it more as saying, well, yeah,

2:21:07in quantum mechanics you can have

2:21:09something that's in many locations at

2:21:10once.

2:21:12But we're routinely making observations.

2:21:16We're routinely using this technology

2:21:19that

2:21:21doesn't space and time doesn't work the

2:21:23way in the simple way our brains

2:21:25perceive it. I mean that that's very

2:21:27quickly becoming an experimental fact.

2:21:30>> Well, that's one of the most bizarre

2:21:31aspects of quantum computing's results

2:21:34is that they're interpreting its ability

2:21:37to solve equations so fast the way Mark

2:21:40Andre described it that if you took

2:21:42every molecule of the universe and

2:21:45converted into a super cube computer, it

2:21:47would the universe would die of heat

2:21:48death before it would a be able to solve

2:21:51this equation. And yet these quantum

2:21:53computers are able to do this in

2:21:54minutes. So, how is that possible? And

2:21:57then the theory that got tossed out

2:22:00there was that it's using the quantum

2:22:05computing power of an insane number of

2:22:09multiple universes.

2:22:11>> Well, yeah.

2:22:12>> You hear that, you're like, okay, maybe.

2:22:14But what do you have evidence of this?

2:22:15Like, this is a crazy thing to say.

2:22:17You're talking about this as being

2:22:18evidence of the multiverse and that's

2:22:20how it's able to solve computer. Is

2:22:21there any other potential explanation to

2:22:24why it's able to compute so quickly?

2:22:26[sighs]

2:22:27>> Yes, but none of them are particularly

2:22:29any more comforting. I mean, they're all

2:22:30that weird.

2:22:31>> I mean, the the idea you're talking sort

2:22:33of about a superp position of states.

2:22:35So, the the the faster a quantum

2:22:37computer works, the more it's able

2:22:39basically to not have one solution, but

2:22:42have the solution be a probabilistic

2:22:44distribution. In in some ways, you're

2:22:46talking about multiple universes where

2:22:48there are different solutions. and then

2:22:50finally at the end of the calculation

2:22:51popping out the one you want. And as

2:22:55weird as that sounds,

2:22:58it's hard to get around that. I mean I

2:23:00mean if if it's not that

2:23:03then it's it's something like reality

2:23:05has many different versions all

2:23:06connected at once and that's just what

2:23:08we call reality. I mean it it's it's not

2:23:10going to get any less weird,

2:23:11>> right? Equally weird.

2:23:13>> Yeah. So the idea that you you keep the

2:23:16solution in this undefined form in a way

2:23:19means that every solution that's

2:23:21possible exists somewhere possibly in

2:23:24one interpretation in another in a

2:23:25universe where each solution exists. Or

2:23:28the one some say is that space and time

2:23:31is just like that. Nothing is certain.

2:23:32Everything is just waves of probability.

2:23:35So yeah, I mean we're in for a ride

2:23:38because the you know that's going to

2:23:40become something that we manipulate. We

2:23:42design computers. We want them to go

2:23:43faster. We want to actually get this to

2:23:44work better. I wonder if quantum

2:23:47computing is going to have us really

2:23:49have to confront what reality is, how

2:23:52different reality is from how our senses

2:23:54tell us it is. Um, I don't see any way

2:23:57around that. I don't think we're going

2:23:58back to things being easily understood

2:24:01by

2:24:02>> again, this brings us back to our

2:24:04limited senses we have as biological

2:24:05organisms. I I I I think you know we're

2:24:07going to keep pushing that envelope of

2:24:09of of you know how much can the human

2:24:11brain comprehend then all of a sudden

2:24:14our brain just doesn't go there. Our

2:24:15brain doesn't understand multiple

2:24:17realities, multiple probabilities, space

2:24:19and time that exist all at once. It's

2:24:21not something we do. Um we we we started

2:24:25that journey so long ago. I mean, you

2:24:27started the interview with looking up at

2:24:28the Milky Way and and one of the things

2:24:31I remember was how Galileo

2:24:34went through this kind of profound uh

2:24:36spiritual crisis when he he he was one

2:24:39of the first people to take a telescope

2:24:40and look at the Milky Way, that sort of

2:24:41white haze. And he realized it was made

2:24:44of stars. It was made of millions of

2:24:45stars that you couldn't see with the

2:24:47human eye. And his question was,

2:24:51why did God put stars up there that we

2:24:53can't see? that we need an instrument

2:24:55that we need this little glass tube to

2:24:57see otherwise we wouldn't see these why

2:25:00did God do that

2:25:02and you start this journey away from the

2:25:05human consciousness being the center of

2:25:07the universe you know and then you know

2:25:10you get you get farther and farther away

2:25:11and you know in quantum mechanics and

2:25:13relativity now you know is challenging

2:25:14us to say you know we we now have

2:25:17scientific proof even among skeptical

2:25:20solid scientists that space and time is

2:25:23definitely not how we perceive it. We

2:25:26don't know what it is yet, but it's not

2:25:29as simple as as the human brain makes

2:25:31it. We know that we're not going back,

2:25:35you know, we have to go forward into

2:25:37that that that oh, that less certain

2:25:39universe.

2:25:41>> That is such a weird statement that the

2:25:44universe is not as we perceive it.

2:25:47>> Our our minds don't do it. And and and

2:25:49why should we be so surprised? Like I

2:25:51said, you know, take a take a wonderful

2:25:53complex simple organism like an ant, you

2:25:57know, how I mean, incredible social

2:25:59structure, incredibly well-designed, you

2:26:02know, think about the mind of that

2:26:04creature, and I think they do have

2:26:05minds, but but compare it to the ca

2:26:08capacity of the human brain. You not the

2:26:10same. And you know, I mean, who are we

2:26:13to think that we're anywhere closer than

2:26:16that ant is to us to understanding, you

2:26:18know, the mind that will understand the

2:26:20true nature of the universe? I think we

2:26:22got a ways to go. [laughter]

2:26:25>> No, I think you're accurate. I don't

2:26:27think there's any other way to say it.

2:26:30And it has to be that way. If if we're

2:26:32evolving and if

2:26:35conscious life and intelligent life is

2:26:37continuing to expand its capacities, it

2:26:39just makes sense that we're we're going

2:26:42to realize how one day people will look

2:26:44back at people that lived in 2026 and

2:26:47go, "What a bunch of silly beans. These

2:26:50foolish people that thought they knew

2:26:51they do it in love." Yeah. Yeah. I mean,

2:26:53and and that's one of the things about

2:26:54AI again that I I I don't like the idea

2:26:56that if something becomes super

2:26:57intelligent, it'll just want to kill us.

2:26:59I mean, I you you probably saw that

2:27:00movie Her with Yakim Phoenix, which came

2:27:02out years ago.

2:27:04>> Have Have you seen that movie?

2:27:05>> Yeah.

2:27:05>> Yeah.

2:27:06>> I I actually really liked it. Was much

2:27:08better than I thought it was going to

2:27:09be. I thought, you know, a man falling

2:27:10in love with his operating system was

2:27:12going to be a really stupid story. But,

2:27:15you know, that the that that was a very

2:27:17interestingly profound movie because the

2:27:19AIs actually fall in love with us. You

2:27:22know, they they don't want to destroy

2:27:23us. They become far more connected, far

2:27:26more intelligent, but but they actually

2:27:29love us. And then eventually, spoiler,

2:27:31at the end of the movie, the AIS go off

2:27:33on their own. They they find ways to

2:27:35connect with each other and love each

2:27:36other in ways we don't even imagine. And

2:27:38they all they all leave benignely. They

2:27:41don't hurt us. And you know, I mean,

2:27:44just like we can be, you know,

2:27:45incredibly impressed with what an ant

2:27:47is, I hope what's coming next, you know,

2:27:50has some compassion for us and some

2:27:53love, uh, you know, about where we are

2:27:55on the journey because I mean, you know,

2:27:57I mean, I I I I think that compassion

2:28:00goes both ways, you know. I I I I love

2:28:02the idea that we're not just going to be

2:28:04enemies that that it could love us, too.

2:28:07>> Yeah. Hopefully,

2:28:09[laughter] that would be nice.

2:28:10>> Otherwise, we're toast. it it and we

2:28:12would imagine that if it's more

2:28:14intelligent than us, then it probably

2:28:16won't have any need for malevolent

2:28:18behavior.

2:28:19>> It won't why would it?

2:28:22>> That's always been the big question

2:28:23about any sort of encounter, you know,

2:28:25with uh you know, with with with higher

2:28:27intelligence or other beings is is is

2:28:29why would they want to hurt us?

2:28:31>> What what good?

2:28:32>> Well, if they did, the the you know, the

2:28:34question would be why haven't they?

2:28:36because it would be so easy to do. So if

2:28:38they really did come from an insanely

2:28:40evolved, insanely advanced civilization,

2:28:43they have the ability to come here.

2:28:45>> They probably have the ability to do

2:28:46whatever they want.

2:28:47>> We probably wouldn't even know. We

2:28:48probably just all fall over dead, you

2:28:49know.

2:28:50>> Yeah. [laughter] If they wanted to just

2:28:51evaporate evaporate the planet, they

2:28:54probably could cuz we can.

2:28:55>> Yeah.

2:28:56>> You know, if we launched every nuclear

2:28:57bomb that we have right now currently,

2:28:59there would be no life left on Earth. So

2:29:01why, you know, it obviously it can do

2:29:04better than that if it can get here.

2:29:06>> I don't think we can kill all the

2:29:07microbes. I mean, there's always that,

2:29:08you know. I uh they'll start all over

2:29:09again.

2:29:10>> Yeah. Yeah. It is it is amazing how

2:29:11tenacious they are. I mean I mean that's

2:29:13a big deal about going you know

2:29:14exploring the solar system is is how how

2:29:16can you I mean we know we can't

2:29:17completely sterilize things.

2:29:19>> Well, we're finding fungi in Chernobyl.

2:29:22>> Oh yeah. Yeah.

2:29:23>> Well or I mean also also things that

2:29:25also things that can live on the outside

2:29:27of the space station. You bacterial and

2:29:28microbes and stuff. I mean to me I mean

2:29:31>> weird

2:29:32>> I don't what one of the most profound

2:29:34discoveries of the last uh say 10 years

2:29:36at NASA I mean this was even more recent

2:29:39than that um was a there was a mission

2:29:41called Osiris Rex and um I'm doing

2:29:44pretty well with my NASA acronyms today.

2:29:45Let's see if I can do this one. This is

2:29:47one of the bad ones. Osiris Rex um

2:29:49origin spectral interpretation resource

2:29:52identification security regalith

2:29:53explorer. There we go. And uh um it

2:29:57brought back a sample of an asteroid.

2:29:59And asteroids, as you know, are these

2:30:01rocks, you know, in space that that were

2:30:03never built into larger planets. And so

2:30:05there there's Osiris Rex. Thank you. And

2:30:09um Osiris Rex is a small spacecraft

2:30:11about the size of a car. And this is an

2:30:13illustration. It went to an asteroid

2:30:14called Bennu. And um Bennu is about half

2:30:17a kilometer across. It is a an asteroid

2:30:19that comes in and and intersects the

2:30:21orbit of Earth. We don't have any idea

2:30:24that it will ever impact us. It may hit

2:30:26Venus before it hits us. But at any

2:30:27rate, um we sent a probe out there to to

2:30:31bring back a real pristine sample of an

2:30:33asteroid because

2:30:34>> which is just nuts, by the way, that

2:30:37they could land on an asteroid and then

2:30:38return back to Earth.

2:30:39>> Do you have Do you know about this

2:30:41mission? Okay. So, so I mean the the

2:30:43asteroid is going faster than a speeding

2:30:44bullet. It doesn't have enough gravity

2:30:46to go into orbit around really until

2:30:47you're really close. We had to catch the

2:30:49thing, get ourselves situated around it,

2:30:52get low enough to get into orbit, match

2:30:54its spin rate to get the And then when

2:30:56they got out there, I love this. Um, you

2:31:00we designed NASA designed this little

2:31:01sort of vacuum cleaner to vacuum up a

2:31:03sample of the asteroid. The whole

2:31:05surface was covered with big boulders.

2:31:07They were just like I mean literally

2:31:08like it's like it's not going to

2:31:10work. We there's nowhere where there are

2:31:12small fine grain uh you know things we

2:31:15can just suck up easily. So they survey

2:31:18the whole thing. They find there are

2:31:19these tiny little craters that have some

2:31:22dust in them. And then they have to

2:31:24reprogram the the uh the spacecraft

2:31:26because it it it wasn't meant to be so

2:31:28autonomous. It's so far away that a

2:31:30command one way is going to take 15

2:31:32minutes. You can't joystick it. It's got

2:31:34to take itself down manually amidst all

2:31:37these boulders. They had to they had to

2:31:39make the spacecraft autonomous after

2:31:41they launched it. They got there. It

2:31:43wasn't going to work. They had to teach

2:31:45it how to recognize where it was, how to

2:31:47wave off if something was too dangerous.

2:31:49This shouldn't have happened. And so

2:31:51they finally vacuum up the sample. They

2:31:53get it back to Earth. You know, they

2:31:55drops on a parachute into the Utah test

2:31:57range. They open up the sample and all

2:32:02of the nucleases of our DNA, not just

2:32:05little molecules, the letters of our DNA

2:32:08and our RNA are in that sample.

2:32:11We don't think that's a coincidence,

2:32:13right? You know, the reason our biology

2:32:15is based on those molecules is that

2:32:17they're available. They're falling from

2:32:19the sky. That asteroid uh was full of

2:32:23water. At one time, the minerals were

2:32:25soaked in water. They were wet. So there

2:32:27there's there's the the asteroids were

2:32:29delivering water and and a little bomb

2:32:32of protolife. Not life yet, but but but

2:32:35the but the the genetic code, the

2:32:37letters of our genetic code were in that

2:32:39asteroid. and and not just our genetic

2:32:42code, but but there were nuclear bases

2:32:43we don't even use. Maybe life on other

2:32:45planet would use different nucleases,

2:32:47but we can already sample them from the

2:32:49asteroids.

2:32:50You know, the the idea that our biology

2:32:53was brought here from these these

2:32:55colder, more distant parts of the solar

2:32:57system, and it's literally raining down

2:32:59on us. You know, I I expected to find

2:33:01organic molecules. I expected to find

2:33:03amino acids, you know, the sort of the

2:33:05things that make up our proteins.

2:33:08I I was amazed. We found all of our

2:33:10nucleioases, all the letters of our

2:33:13genetic code, both for DNA and RNA.

2:33:15They're they're already there in the

2:33:17asteroid,

2:33:17>> which is nuts. The idea of panspermia

2:33:20and that this is how life got here in

2:33:24the first place.

2:33:24>> Well, yeah, absolutely. The building

2:33:26blocks just come down from space and

2:33:28they I mean, they hit everywhere

2:33:30>> from where?

2:33:31>> Well, that's a little bit less

2:33:33mysterious than you'd think. the the the

2:33:36universe is great at making large scale

2:33:39organic molecules. Um carbon is a sticky

2:33:41atom and you make um dying stars are

2:33:45great at making carbon. It's one of the

2:33:46most common things that comes out of a

2:33:48dying star and the electron structure of

2:33:51of carbon wants to grab on to other

2:33:53atoms. It it's literally the quantum

2:33:55mechanics. And so you have this

2:33:57naturally I mean this is building block

2:34:00of the carbon and dying stars are

2:34:03pumping out this stuff into the galaxy.

2:34:05You know they they gets collected by

2:34:07gravity into these clouds and then the

2:34:09carbon starts gloming onto each other.

2:34:11And so space itself is very good at

2:34:14making our our chemistry carbon- based

2:34:16organic chemistry. So then in the in the

2:34:20icier outer reaches of the solar system

2:34:22billions of years ago, you know that the

2:34:24planets are forming, but there are some

2:34:26smaller bits of ice and rock that never

2:34:28quite got built into the larger planets.

2:34:31They're they're still floating around

2:34:32out there and uh you know, and then they

2:34:35occasionally come in and and hit us and

2:34:37deliver water, deliver organics. You

2:34:40know, the the the Earth was once, you

2:34:42know, a pretty much a dry hot ball of

2:34:44lava after it formed. you know, all of

2:34:46the, you know, a lot of the lighter

2:34:48stuff probably arrived from collisions

2:34:50coming in later.

2:34:53>> Yeah. And I mean, the the engineering,

2:34:57the audacity of of reprogram this this

2:35:01this thing shouldn't have worked and

2:35:02they they saved it and they they made it

2:35:04work. this brilliant team of people, you

2:35:08know, I mean, it it just I mean, as as

2:35:11somebody who was a, you know, a minor

2:35:12manager at NASA, you know, and a minor

2:35:14scientist, I mean, ju just what what a

2:35:17team can accomplish. I mean, not just a

2:35:19single person, you know, one of the the

2:35:21the big things that I really respected

2:35:23at NASA was once you had your team of

2:35:25people, and like I said, nobody's

2:35:26perfect. Some people are higher

2:35:27functioning, some people don't

2:35:28contribute as much. But once you have

2:35:30your team identified, trying to make

2:35:32sure you get an input from everyone and

2:35:34they're not going to give it to you the

2:35:35same way. There are the people that are

2:35:37really assertive in meetings and they've

2:35:39got an idea immediately. They speak up

2:35:40and they give it to you. And then there

2:35:42are the quieter people that are going to

2:35:43take longer to process. They they're

2:35:46going to need a little more time. They

2:35:48don't like to be put on the spot. You

2:35:50know, trying to make sure you you get an

2:35:52input from everybody on your team. And

2:35:54sometimes the solutions come from the

2:35:55people that you might not have even

2:35:56asked. You know, the the that sort of

2:36:00respect for everyone on our team has

2:36:03something to contribute. You know, give

2:36:05me what you got. Even if you don't think

2:36:06it's good enough, even if you think it's

2:36:08a stupid idea, even if you think it, you

2:36:11know, give me what you got. The power of

2:36:14that I saw over and over at NASA. It's

2:36:16not just one type of mind, not just one

2:36:19person that's going to solve the

2:36:20problem.

2:36:21>> That's awesome. That is awesome. Thank

2:36:24you so much for being here. I really

2:36:25enjoyed this conversation. It was really

2:36:27great.

2:36:27>> I did too. It was a lot of fun.

2:36:28>> It was fantastic. And and thank you for

2:36:30everything that you put online. It's so

2:36:32valuable. It's so educational, so

2:36:34interesting. It's awesome.

2:36:36>> I'll try to do a little more and have

2:36:37some fun with it because uh I like I

2:36:39said, I'm retired now and uh I have a

2:36:41chance to be a little more creative with

2:36:42it. So, uh we'll see what I can do.

2:36:44>> You definitely should do something. A

2:36:46YouTube channel, something along those

2:36:47lines. Yeah, definitely a podcast,

2:36:49something.

2:36:50>> Do it.

2:36:51>> I will try.

2:36:51>> Please do. [laughter] Um, if people want

2:36:53to find you on social media. Do you have

2:36:55that?

2:36:56>> Well, yeah. I I mean, so I I um somebody

2:36:58had taken Michelle Fer. So, I go by Dr.

2:37:00Michelle Ther. Uh there's a Facebook

2:37:02page and an Instagram, and I do have a a

2:37:05small uh YouTube channel set up. I'll do

2:37:07more of that. I I just started uh doing

2:37:09Tik Tok. Um and uh so so I'm I'm I'm

2:37:12just getting started, but I'll I'll

2:37:13[music] try to put some stuff out.

2:37:14>> All right. Awesome. Thank you so much.

2:37:16Thank you. All right. Bye, everybody.

2:37:23>> [music]

More from PowerfulJRE

Recently added transcripts

Browse the whole transcript library

This transcript was generated from the captions YouTube publishes for this video. Get the transcript of any YouTube video atfreeyoutubetranscribe.com, free, unlimited, no sign-up.