Full transcript
0:00In my last video, I said I needed 66
0:02days to get legal advice. And for some
0:04of you, you might have realized it's
0:05quite a long time because I lied. Not
0:06only was I getting legal advice, I was
0:08doing something else. And I decided not
0:10to put this in the first video in case
0:12legal came for me pretty hard. I've not
0:14had any public statement. I've not been
0:16contacted by any lawyers since my last
0:18video. Push are deleting a lot of
0:20comments and attempting to hide it all.
0:21So, it's time to reveal the pocket ace.
0:23So, let's reveal the biggest bombshell
0:25in this scandal. While I was in fact
0:28seeking legal advice for this video, I
0:30thought to really cover my tracks, I
0:31wouldn't just send the gummies off to
0:33get tested. I would send them off to
0:34China to get tested. Not just from
0:36Euroins, but from the exact same Euroins
0:40that Push Gummies allegedly get their
0:42gummies tested. So, in my eyes, if we
0:44sent it to their lab using their tests
0:47they claim work, and if I was to get it
0:48signed off by the very same person that
0:51signed off their testing, surely they
0:53would now come back containing creatine,
0:55right? Strawberry flavor, creatine not
0:57detected. Apple flavor, creatine not
0:59detected. And look who we have down
1:01here. Mr. Ryan Luo. So, I think at this
1:03point we cannot blame the testing
1:05method. I know what you're thinking.
1:07Maybe it was a bad batch. Well, let's
1:08bring into question one of the batches,
1:11PGL 3612, which as you can see in this
1:14short video here is the batch that we
1:16sent off to China to get tested. Now, if
1:18I bring up the PGL 3612 document from
1:22the push website, which is redacted, you
1:24will see that the results come in
1:26containing creatine, how is it that the
1:28batch you sent to your factory comes
1:31back redacted with creatine and the
1:33batch, the exact same batch that I send
1:35to the same factory to the same person
1:38came back with no creatine detected.
1:40You'll even notice where we sent the
1:42gummies, we sent a sealed bag, so we
1:44couldn't have interfered with the batch.
1:45Now, interestingly on this one,
1:47consignation testing, which is
1:49interesting. Surely, if you were sending
1:50your own batch to China, it would have
1:51gone in a sealed bag like the ones we
1:53did. And hopefully by this point, I
1:55think you are starting to connect the
1:56dots. We now know there's no creatine in
1:58these gummies from their own labs. Now,
2:00this leaves a lot of questions to be
2:02asked. They now cannot dispute the
2:04results, and I don't even think their
2:05legal team would probably pursue this
2:07any further. They probably said, "We're
2:09out." But it doesn't end here. We
2:10decided to get in touch with push via
2:12Instagram and just in case someone
2:14thought that maybe this was made in
2:15Photoshop we'll do it through the video.
2:17So we asked just reading your
2:18transparency post who does your testing
2:20is it you or does your factory supplier
2:22provide them with every batch that you
2:23buy from them? Says here that push say
2:25we take our testing very seriously and
2:26have been transparent about the testing
2:28we put our gummies through to prove
2:29their creatine content. Looks like this
2:31is a bit of a copypaste result. So we
2:32ask the very important question who does
2:34your testing is it you guys scenario A
2:36or does the factory or supplier provide
2:39you with the every batch that you buy
2:40from them which would be B. Just to make
2:42this real clear they said yeah Europins
2:44does the testing and we deal directly
2:45with Europins ourselves. So just to
2:47double check you send the product
2:48yourselves to Europins from New Zealand
2:50and here it is. We have an agent who
2:51sends the gummies to Europins and we
2:53deal directly with them. We pay them
2:55direct. We work with them on the testing
2:57and we are sent the results directly.
2:59This is separate from our manufacturer.
3:01So, we asked the simple question, why
3:02would you not send your own product
3:04yourself to Europins? It's super easy to
3:06do. Done it countless times now. And we
3:08asked the question, how do you know you
3:09aren't receiving incorrect information
3:11like the ones where the QR codes are
3:12redacted? Do you have them? Who redacted
3:14them? You or the agent or the person at
3:16the factory? They come back with a bit
3:18of a deflection. We aim to deliver as
3:19quickly as possible post-production,
3:21tweet, blah blah blah. So, we just
3:22double check your Europ's agent is based
3:24in China. And we're kind of confused
3:25here. Why go to the trouble to send them
3:27to Europins in China who take 66 days to
3:30get back to you when you could get the
3:31packs and send them to a local lab.
3:32They've got to go to China. They've got
3:34to clear customs. Got to wait an extra
3:36few weeks to see if a product is legit.
3:38So, we double checked the agent you used
3:39is based in China. Yes, they are. If you
3:41send it to Europins in New Zealand, they
3:43will ship it to the same lab
3:44internationally that our agent ships it
3:46to. They would not do this sort of
3:47testing within New Zealand, Australia,
3:48or even likely the UK. So, we asked the
3:50question, did your factory supplier
3:52introduce you to the agent? And from
3:54there, the DMs start to go cold. So,
3:55they don't do their own testing.
3:56Apparently, it's an agent and they don't
3:58even know where the testing happens,
4:00even though it's there on their own
4:01documents. And as they aren't doing
4:02their own testing, they can't actually
4:04authenticate the documents. And it's
4:05starting to sound a lot like overload
4:07here, which is crazy because after the
4:08overload takedown, you would think that
4:10anyone out there that runs a creatine
4:11gummy brand business would double check
4:14that they're not fraudulently being
4:15misled by their provider. So, some
4:17questions I have here for the audience.
4:19Why are some of these tests redacted and
4:21the new ones aren't? It's just crazy to
4:22think that Push aren't doing their own
4:24testing as we can see from their
4:25messages. And I've always had this
4:27suspicion as soon as I saw that the
4:28documents were Chinese. Is it negligence
4:30or did they just not want to know? Or as
4:32it looks, they're probably buying these
4:34gummies from a manufacturer in China
4:35that are given them these documents. And
4:37if Push themselves aren't doing this
4:39testing, what local Chinese supplier is
4:41providing this to urins because it's not
4:43their product. They're providing
4:44something else. So, do we think Push are
4:46ripping people off for thousands or
4:49potentially even millions of dollars? In
4:50my honest personal opinion, I don't
4:52think that's the case. I think they've
4:53been [ __ ] up good and proper here by a
4:55Chinese supplier. Very similar to
4:57overload. But there is no excuses for
4:58not doing your own testing, especially
5:00with the amount of sales that you're
5:01making. When even some of your one-star
5:02reviews on Amazon, people clearly say
5:04they've taken creatine gummies before
5:06and these ones have no creatine in
5:07because they taste too good or people
5:08aren't getting the results. You go, you
5:10know what? Maybe let's check that. And
5:11you're probably thinking as well, why
5:13would the Chinese manufacturers not put
5:14creatine in the gummy when it's so cheap
5:16and easily readily available? Well, in
5:17my honest personal opinion, I think it's
5:19this. You want the experience of someone
5:21eating the gummy to be as good as
5:22possible. You actually want them to say,
5:24"Wow, I couldn't even tell there was
5:25creatine in there." Which is ironic
5:26because there isn't. When you put
5:28creatine in the gummies, I think you
5:29tank the likeliness of someone repeat
5:31purchasing. I think by making it taste
5:33better and not putting creatine in it,
5:34you give people that wow factor. So, by
5:36selling people sweets to sell on with
5:38the illusion there's creatine in there,
5:39your chance of repeat business and your
5:41average customer value is only going to
5:42be heightened, which means that the
5:44factory in China is only going to get
5:45more business. Purely hypothetical. Now,
5:46push, you can do the right thing and
5:48come off sale immediately. You start
5:49doing your own tests and you find a new
5:51supplier of a product that actually
5:52contains creatine. This is what Overload
5:54have done. But I don't think overload
5:55were completely honest either, as I
5:57don't think their products ever had
5:58creatine in them like they tried to
5:59claim. Or they wouldn't have had to
6:01change their entire product line to what
6:03is very apparently a brand new product.
6:05Or maybe Push will dig in, continue to
6:07block people, delete comments, and to
6:08lie to their customers and athletes. If
6:10that's the case, I'd quite like to see
6:11what a court would think of this. And I
6:13wonder how much the refunds could equate
6:15to and whether or not anyone would face
6:16prison time. Time to do the right thing
6:18here. Push. You have a great brand here.
6:19I just hope you can fix this immediately
6:21and do the right thing. Not by me, but
6:23all the people that bought your product.