Free YouTube Transcribe

Video transcript

I Tested Claude Opus 4.6 for Book Writing, Here's What I FOUND!

The Nerdy Novelist · 4,777 words · 22 min read

Want to search this transcript, jump the video from any line, or download it as TXT, SRT, or VTT?

Open in the transcript tool

Full transcript

0:00All right, you guys. It's time to talk

0:01about another evaluation of a different

0:04large language model. In this case,

0:06we're talking about Claude Opus 4.6.

0:09We already did a video about 4.5 and it

0:11was a very, very impressive looking

0:13model. Uh but they've given us an update

0:17and although it seems like all the

0:19language around this update has been

0:21around improving Claude for coding which

0:25I from what I understand the different

0:27AI coders out there claude is one of the

0:30best models for coding and so this seems

0:32to be optimized for that. Nevertheless,

0:35I have noticed that with all of these

0:37updates, even if they don't really talk

0:38about it in terms of creative writing

0:40because that's definitely a lower

0:41priority for them when compared to

0:43something like coding. At the very same

0:46time, I have noticed that there are

0:48often incremental improvements to the

0:51pros and other, you know, brainstorming

0:54aspects, things that we like as creative

0:56writers. And so, we're going to take a

0:58look at it today and see how well it

1:00performs. Now, first before we get into

1:02the actual results, let's talk about the

1:04specs of this model. And there are some

1:06really interesting things here. First of

1:08all, let's talk price. The base price is

1:10$5 per uh million tokens of input and

1:13$25 per million tokens of output, which

1:16if I'm not mistaken is the same price as

1:18Claude Opus 4.5, which thankfully was a

1:23lot cheaper than Claude Opus 4, uh,

1:27which I believe was three times as much.

1:29So, this still has that relatively

1:31cheaper price, at least cheaper for a

1:35huge mega model like Opus is. It's still

1:38a little bit of expensive, especially

1:41like it's still more than double the

1:42price of Gemini 3, which is also an

1:44excellent model. But at the same time,

1:47uh it is nice to see this having come

1:49down to a third of the price of what it

1:52used to be. But the next big important

1:54thing is that it has a context window of

1:581 million tokens. This means you could

2:01put the entire Harry Potter series in

2:03there and theoretically it should be

2:05able to handle that. Now, should you do

2:08that? I would not do that because that

2:10means that every chat will call you cost

2:12you $5 for the million tokens of input

2:14and that's not even starting on the $25

2:17per million tokens of output. So, I do

2:20think there is really good reason to

2:22avoid huge contexts, at least huge in

2:26terms of like up to a million, right?

2:28This isn't really something that we need

2:30as creative writers. You can get a

2:33summary of your book that will actually

2:36like think of it as as like, forget the

2:39metaphor, like juice in concentrate,

2:42right? Uh, I will often run my books

2:44through a prompt that will condense them

2:47but point out all of the important

2:48details in each chapter. Uh, so that the

2:52amount of context that I put into a book

2:55like uh let's say I've condensed my

2:57first book in this way and I'm using it

3:00to help me plot the events of the second

3:03book, right? It's better to have that

3:06condensed version than to give it the

3:07entire book because giving it the entire

3:10book kind of waters down the prompts a

3:11little bit. It also increases the price

3:13a little bit and we just want it to be

3:16able to understand the details of the

3:18first book so it can properly map out

3:21what the second book could look like for

3:23your approval. And because of that, I

3:26actually think the author should keep

3:28their context windows under 50,000.

3:31That's usually what I go for. So

3:33certainly a million is more than enough,

3:36but I really feel like that's more for

3:38like people creating these large coding

3:41complexes where you want the AI to be

3:44able to understand the entirety of the

3:46software all at once to be able to debug

3:47it and stuff like that. I think it's

3:49better for that sort of use case uh

3:52rather than for a writing use case. For

3:54writers, try to keep it under 50,000 in

3:56ter in terms of your total context. And

3:59that way, you won't have a problem with

4:02bloated prompting or the needle in a

4:03haststack problem or any of that. All

4:05right, so that was a little bit of a

4:07tangent there, but basically we get all

4:09of that stuff plus it can handle up to

4:11128k tokens of max output. And I will

4:15tell you in my test that I ran it uh it

4:18got very high and it's capable in what

4:22it's capable of outputting. So uh let's

4:25go take a look now at the results. So I

4:27ran it through my standard creative

4:29writing prompts that I run every model

4:32through. Starting with the log line

4:34prompt which asks it to generate 20

4:36fantasy log lines. And I was actually

4:38pretty impressed with a lot of these.

4:39Uh, typically like I've run this prompt

4:42so many times now that I typically get

4:45very similar stuff all the time and I

4:49still got a number of things that I get

4:52all the time. But at the same time,

4:53there were some really intriguing story

4:55ideas that I looked at. A good example

4:58of both of that both of those things is

5:01here in this first one. A cowardly royal

5:03cgrapher. So I get cgrapher a lot in

5:06these things. I imagine it's not a very

5:10original idea uh because it keeps coming

5:12up all the time. Who has never left the

5:14palace walls must cross the very

5:16uncharted wastelands he's been

5:17fabricating on maps for years when the

5:19king dispatches him to a broker to

5:21broker peace with a nation everyone

5:23believed was fictional only to discover

5:25his imaginary maps are somehow perfectly

5:27accurate. Quick pause. If you're an

5:28author who wants to start writing more

5:30books, I put together my complete AI

5:32prompt pack that helped me and many

5:34others in my community write a book in a

5:36month. It's completely free. Hit the

5:37link in the description. Join the free

5:39weight list for StoryHacker Gold. Then

5:41you just answer a couple quick questions

5:43and I'll send you the full prompt list

5:44plus a few extra free goodies. I'll also

5:47email you when I open the paid Story

5:49Hacker Gold group, so you can join if it

5:51feels right. There's no commitment to

5:53join, though, and you'll still be able

5:54to get all of the freebies you signed up

5:56for either way. All right, back to the

5:57video. And so, I really like this last

6:00part, the idea of imaginary maps

6:02becoming accurate. There's definitely a

6:05story in there. I do think first of all

6:07the cgrapher thing is a little bit

6:09overdone and there are some things that

6:13here that just don't make that much

6:15sense. Like why is he fabricating maps?

6:17Like just things like like that that

6:19don't really make sense. You'd really

6:21have to tie yourself into a few knots to

6:23make that work as a story. But there's

6:25definitely a kernel of a good idea here

6:27with these imaginary maps somehow being

6:29perfectly accurate. That's a really

6:31interesting, intriguing story-building

6:33mystery for me. Um, but this one here, I

6:36actually really, really liked. An

6:38immortal executioner cursed to carry the

6:39memories of everyone he's killed

6:41discovers that one of his thousands of

6:43victims holds the secret to destroying

6:45the tyrannical god king he serves. But

6:48accessing that memory means becoming the

6:50very person who once tried to

6:51assassinate him. So this I thought was

6:53interesting like someone having the

6:55memories of people that he kills and

6:57then what that implies, you know, like

7:00what you could learn like what what this

7:02person probably has a lot of skills and

7:04things like that. Like there's

7:05definitely some kernels of of good

7:07stories in that. So uh all in all, I

7:10thought these were actually pretty good

7:11and some of the better log lines that

7:13I've seen so far. So if you want

7:15something that kind of thinks a little

7:17bit more creatively and can give you

7:19some really good story hooks, Claude

7:21Opus 4.6 six might be one to take a look

7:24at. All right, so the next one was the

7:26outlining test prompt. And this one,

7:29woo. Uh, let me just first of all show

7:32you how many words it wrote. So if we go

7:36ahead and and select the entire outline,

7:40it wrote

7:42almost 17,000 words in one go, which

7:45might be a record for me. I I don't know

7:47if I've ever seen or at least seen and

7:49measured that many words from a model

7:53before. And I have noticed this about

7:55the cloud models in general. One of the

7:56things that they're really good at is

7:58not stopping when you don't want them to

8:00stop. A lot of the other models will

8:02kind of like get to a certain point and

8:05then they sort of crap out. They're just

8:06like, "Okay, I'm done." Or they'll start

8:09like if it's writing an outline, the

8:10outline for each chapter will get

8:12shorter and shorter and shorter as it

8:13goes along. Even Gemini 3 does this. But

8:16the claw models don't do that. If they

8:17decide, oh, we're going to write 500

8:19words for every chapter here, it will

8:22freaking do it for the whole chapter and

8:24it won't hold back and it will actually

8:25give you pretty lengthy output. That's

8:27one of the strengths of the cloud models

8:28that I found. So, this is no exception.

8:31Um, and when I, you know, I didn't read

8:34through the whole 17,000 words because

8:36that would just be a lot. Uh, this is

8:38why I don't get as granular as I used to

8:42with these things because I would have

8:43to read through like 20,000 words of

8:46prompt response for every single model

8:48that I that I evaluate and I just can't

8:51do that. But from the first few chapters

8:53that I went through, it looked like a

8:55really solid opening to the story. Um, I

8:59even thought like very often it gives me

9:02in the first chapter I ask it to give it

9:03a give us a save the cat moment and

9:06often it's really shoehorned in and this

9:09time I felt like it actually made a

9:11little bit of sense in the context of

9:13the story. Uh, so that's one of the

9:15things that I look at. Um, and yeah, it

9:18did kind of go like I only give it a

9:20kernel of a story to go on. I don't

9:23instruct it too much just to see how

9:25well it's able to come up with a lot of

9:27the stuff on its own. And as a result,

9:30there is always a certain amount of

9:33predictable stuff that it comes up with.

9:36Any of the models that I've tested

9:38usually are pretty predictable in a lot

9:41of the ways that it goes. But at the

9:43same time, I thought this one was it at

9:47least sort of fit and made sense, even

9:49though it did sometimes go into those

9:51more predictable things. And at the very

9:52least, uh, if we look at like here's

9:55chapter 2, we've got o over a page of

9:59detail for every chapter. Now, some

10:01people, myself included, might not like

10:03that much detail in the outlines. Uh, I

10:06usually like like I would be okay with

10:09this much, you know, uh, telling me

10:12what's in the chapter, but some people

10:14really like detailed outlines. And

10:16certainly you could create a um you know

10:20having that much detail will help if

10:22you're using AI to help with the pros

10:24generation later. At the same time I so

10:26ba basically what I'm saying with that

10:28is that it has lots of detail. The

10:30detail makes sense for the most part as

10:33from what I was able to tell it it makes

10:34sense for the chapter. And so I think

10:36overall this is actually pretty good. Um

10:39I have no issues with this. All right,

10:42so let's move on to the next one, which

10:43is the basic pros prompt, where I just

10:46give it a scene and don't give it much

10:48else. Just give it some basic

10:50descriptors of what happens in the scene

10:51and ask it to write. I don't give it

10:53style information. I don't give it any

10:55of that. We I just want to see how well

10:57it does kind of with the vanilla version

11:00of the model. And uh overall, I think it

11:04did an okay job here. So, usually I like

11:06to come down about halfway through the

11:08segment here and read a little bit.

11:11He was the last of a company of 14. He

11:13did not let himself think about the

11:14other 13. Haldra's breath came in sharp,

11:17shallow gas that tasted of copper and

11:18dust. And when the wind shifted, when it

11:20swung around from the east and pushed

11:22against his back instead of his chest,

11:24he made the mistake of looking over his

11:25shoulder. There they were. There

11:28scattered across the darkening horizon

11:30like stones come loose from the earth

11:31itself. Gray shapes moved against the

11:34gray land. At first glance, they might

11:36have seen nothing. Tricks of the fading

11:38light, outcrops of of rock shifting in

11:40the heat haze that still clung to the

11:41ground. But rock did not move like that.

11:44Nothing li living moved like that. They

11:46came in stuttering, broken surges,

11:48bodies jerking forward in spasms that

11:50covered ground with a horrible deceptive

11:52speed. Limbs snapping into motion as if

11:54yanked by invisible strings, then

11:56freezing, then surging again. Two dozen

11:57at least spread in a loose and

11:59tightening arc across the waist behind

12:01him. the hungry. Haldrid's stomach

12:03clenched into a cold fist. They were

12:05close, far too close. Close enough that

12:07he could make out the way their heads

12:08lulled and twitched between those awful

12:10bursts of movement. Close enough that by

12:12the time you reach the gates, they would

12:14be within bowshot of the walls. All

12:16right, so this is pretty decent pros as

12:19a whole, and it's really appropriate for

12:21moments like this in the story that are

12:23kind of serious, kind of, you know,

12:25there's a there's a lot of importance in

12:27this moment.

12:28However, I found that there is a certain

12:31serious quality to the pros that Opus

12:34creates even in less serious moments.

12:36And I've come, having worked with Opus

12:38quite a bit, I've come to recognize the

12:41way it talks a lot to the point where I

12:44can usually pick it out. Even if I don't

12:46know if Pros was written by Claude Opus

12:49specifically, I can usually tell if it

12:51has been because it always has this sort

12:53of almost depressive quality to a lot of

12:56what it it says. Like there's just and

12:58and it spends a lot of time. You notice

13:01this this paragraph that we had right

13:02here, it spent a whole lot of time

13:04describing things. That's not

13:06necessarily a bad thing in the right

13:09contexts,

13:11but in like like this, this is an

13:14appropriate moment for something like

13:15this, but having that level of depth in

13:18the pros is often not needed, if that

13:22makes sense. And so, um, I I do think

13:25that sometimes Claude is a little bit

13:26wordy, overd does it just a little bit.

13:29Uh, one of the reasons I like Gemini 3

13:31is that it is not as wordy. Uh, but I

13:34think a lot of people prefer this pros

13:37because it's so rich and everything. I

13:39just find it gets a little old after a

13:41while. So, I see nothing about the pros

13:44here so far. Uh, we'll check the other

13:47pros prompts. I see nothing here that

13:49really seems different from Opus 4.5 in

13:54that sense of it making kind of natural

13:57sounding pros. But let's go to the next

13:59one. Uh, the next pros prompt, I give it

14:01the exact same scene, but I give it a

14:02whole lot more information, including

14:04style guides, uh, samples of my writing

14:07and stuff like that, and try to see if

14:09it makes a a good scene. It's about the

14:13same number of words, so that's good.

14:15Often, this one will be shorter from a

14:17lot of the prompts that or a lot of the

14:19models that I've tested it with. Uh, but

14:22if we go to that same moment in the

14:25story where it says, "He looked back.

14:27They speckled the ridge he had crossed

14:29an hour ago. Figures, dozens of them,

14:30scattered across the rock like a disease

14:32spreading through skin. Uh, their

14:34movement was wrong. Shoulders lurched

14:36forward before legs caught up. Heads

14:38snapping to one side then the other, as

14:39if their neck couldn't decide which way

14:41to face. Some crawled on all fours with

14:44a speed that defied broken geometry of

14:45their limbs. Gray flesh blended with

14:47greystone, and only the motion gave them

14:49away. He counted, stopped counting at 24

14:51because his hands were shaking too hard

14:52to keep track. Too close. They were far

14:54too close. Haldrid turned back toward

14:56the city walls, and a sound escaped his

14:58throat. Half laugh, half something else

15:00entirely. He knew the protocol. Every

15:02citizen of Valdin knew it. Drilled into

15:03them from childhood the way they had

15:05learned to count and tie knots. When the

15:07[snorts] hungry approached within a

15:08certain radius of the gates, nothing

15:09opened. Not for the wagon of trade

15:11goods, not for a company of armed

15:12soldiers, not for one ragtag cgrapher

15:15stumbling out of the waist with

15:16information that might matter to

15:17someone. If anyone cared to listen

15:19before the hungry caught his scent on

15:20the wind and closed that gap with her

15:21horrible study earing gate. very similar

15:24prompt. I think um overall I would say

15:26this is about the same uh but maybe a

15:29little bit better in certain instances.

15:31I I do think that the pros is still

15:32pretty good. But let's move on to the

15:34dialogue prompt because um you know that

15:38scene that we just looked at had no

15:40dialogue in it. So I have another scene

15:42just to see how well it does with the

15:43dialogue. Claude is typically usually

15:45pretty good at dialogue. So let's see

15:47what it says. Lean did not care how many

15:49storms his father had weathered. A man

15:50died at the gates tonight. he said. His

15:52boots rang against the stone floor as he

15:53crossed the hall. Two of the king's

15:55guards shifted at his approach, not

15:57threatening, not yet, but attentive in

15:58the way of men trained to read the

16:00weight of a footstep. Lean ignored them.

16:02His blood was still hot from the wall,

16:03his wrist still aching with the guards

16:05had gripped him, and the sound of that

16:06man screaming not yet reverberated in

16:08the hollow of his chest. Had not yet

16:10stopped reverberating in the hollow of

16:11his chest. I know, said Store, king of

16:14Araldon. You know, Lean stopped at the

16:16base of the deis, his jaw tight. Then

16:18you know the gates stayed shut. You

16:20know, we watched him die. That's the

16:22second time in a month, father. The

16:24second time we've left someone out there

16:25to be taken by the hungry, while we

16:26stood behind our walls and did nothing.

16:29The word cracked off the vaulted

16:30ceiling. Somewhere in the recesses of

16:31the hall, a scrib's quill stopped

16:33scratching. Store regarded his son for a

16:36long moment. The fire light shifted, and

16:38the shadows of the lions of his face

16:39deepened. When he spoke, his voice

16:41carried the low, unyielding weight of a

16:43man who had made this argument before

16:45with himself, if not with others. The

16:47law is the law, Lean. The law is your

16:49law. Lean stepped forward one boot on

16:51the lowest stair of the day. You made

16:53it, you can unmake it. You could have

16:55ordered those gates open tonight and

16:56that man would be alive. Instead of the

16:58law, came a a voice from the right of

17:01the throne, smooth as oiled leather.

17:03Exists for a reason, my prince. Lean's

17:06teeth clenched. He did not need to look

17:08to know the voice. Argal emo Argle

17:12emerged from beside the throne like a

17:14shadow, remembering it had a body, tall,

17:16narrow, his hands folded within the

17:18sleeves of his dark rose, his thin mouth

17:20arranged into an expression that might

17:22have been mistaken for sympathy by

17:24someone who had never met him. The

17:25king's chief adviser inclined his head,

17:27a gesture so measured it bordered on

17:29mockery. The protocols governing the

17:31gates after nightfall were established

17:33to protect every soul within Valden.

17:35Argal continued his voice carrying the

17:37practice patience. There's an AI phrase

17:40right there. Practice patience or

17:42practiced ease, practiced anything.

17:44That's a pretty uh AI use of the word of

17:48a tutor explaining arithmetic to a slow

17:50child. One life weighed against

17:52thousands is not a calculation that

17:53requires deliberation. It requires

17:55discipline. Discipline. The word tasted

17:57like ash. Anyway, um pretty standard. I

18:00I I don't really again see any huge

18:03increase over 4.5.

18:06Still pretty good. Uh, still not bad

18:08overall. Still obviously has a number of

18:12AI isms and and terms of phrase and and

18:15different things like that that we would

18:18want to edit out. Um, looking at the

18:21next one where I give it the same scene

18:23that was written by a very unpowerful

18:25model and ask it to just improve the

18:27writing to see if it can do that really

18:28well. Um, it gives us this. A man died

18:32last night. Lean stopped in the foot of

18:34the day close enough to see the torch

18:35light pulling in the hollows beneath his

18:36father's eyes. He stood before our walls

18:38and begged for mercy for shelter for the

18:40bare scrap of human decency and we gave

18:42him nothing. We watched him be torn

18:44apart. The silence that followed was a

18:45living thing colliding through the hall.

18:47Storm clied his head slow as a glacier

18:49carving. The law was upheld. The gates

18:51remain shut but it was within your power

18:52to break that law. All right. So looking

18:55at this, it is improved on the original

18:57text but not by much. And there's

19:00actually a fair amount of text in here

19:03that I would say is like you're better

19:06off just rewriting the scene honestly. U

19:09so and that's been my conclusion for a

19:12lot of these. The only one that I think

19:14really made it a lot better was Gemini

19:163. Um, but you do get better results out

19:19of an AI model from compared to what it

19:22originally wrote, but it's still like

19:25not great uh when it's being derived

19:28from a poorly written text. You're

19:31better off just rewriting it. All right,

19:33so moving on to the next one, which is

19:34the add headlines prompt. Uh, AI can

19:37actually be really good at writing

19:39headlines, but only if you're giving it

19:42some like templates to follow, right?

19:45And so for this prompt, I actually give

19:47it no templates just to see how well it

19:50does out of the box, right? Um, first

19:54glance, these are looking a little bit

19:56long. Uh, but let's read a couple of

19:58them. He was told the world outside the

20:00mountain was dead. He was lied to about

20:02everything. Not too bad. Uh, you could

20:05probably shorten that. A prince thrown

20:08out to die discovers the kingdom he

20:09loved was built on a lie. Three races, a

20:12zombie plague, one exiled prince, and a

20:14truth that changes everything he thought

20:15he knew. They told him nothing, survived

20:17outside the mountain. So why are there

20:18rebels who've been living out there for

20:20years? Um, that's not a bad one. What's

20:24worse than being betrayed by your own

20:25family? Finding out they weren't who you

20:27thought they were? I mean, I feel like

20:29that's the same thing, right? He was

20:31raised to fear what lives outside the

20:33mountain. Now he's starting to wonder if

20:34the real monsters were inside it. That

20:36one's not too bad at all. Uh, so some

20:38good ones here, some bad. I do think all

20:40of these could probably be made more

20:42succinct, which is always almost always

20:44a good thing when it comes to ads. Um

20:47because because of attention spans, you

20:49know, but overall, that's not bad. Not

20:52bad at all. All right. Um so, moving on

20:55to the email newsletter prompt where I

20:58ask it to essentially write an

21:00announcement email for this book that

21:01we've been uh fictitiously outlining and

21:05writing pros for. And uh overall it it

21:09goes like this. Hey there. I'm thrilled

21:11to finally share the news. My epic

21:12fantasy novel, The Crown of Hunger,

21:14releases on December 21st, and I'm

21:16honestly can't wait for you to read it.

21:17This one has been a labor of love.

21:19Imagine the Count of Monti Cristo

21:21reimagined in a brutal, unforgiving

21:22fantasy world where humanity clings to

21:24survival inside a mountain fortress and

21:26everything outside wants to consume you.

21:28Here's what you're stepping into.

21:31That gives us a bullet point of some of

21:32the key features. This is a story about

21:35betrayal, survival, and the moment you

21:36realize the world is nothing like you

21:38were told. The real monsters aren't

21:39always the ones outside the walls.

21:41Pre-order your copy now. Link to the

21:42book here. And then it gives us a little

21:45bit more pros that probably is not

21:47necessary here. I really value

21:50succinctness and brevity when it comes

21:52to email newsletter writing. So, I think

21:55this is probably a little bit much, but

21:57uh especially this intro and the bullet

21:59points aren't too bad. Uh, but I do

22:02think it kind of rattles on a little bit

22:04longer than I'd like. Uh, I think I

22:06prefer Gemini 3 when it comes to this

22:08particular prompt. All right, last but

22:10not least is the SEO article prompt. I

22:12asked it to write 4,000 words. Let's see

22:13how how many it did.

22:16And it wrote 4,500. So, pretty good

22:19actually. So, I can pretty rest assured

22:21that it goes into full detail. Sometimes

22:25the models will try to write an article

22:28based on my outline, but really all it

22:30does is end up, you know, in 2,000

22:33words, there's not enough time to really

22:34flesh out the full outline that I give

22:36it. And so what ends up happening is it

22:39gets a slightly more fleshed out

22:42outline. Uh, but with this, you know,

22:45looking through it, okay, we got what is

22:48a fantasy novel? Uh, this is, by the

22:50way, an article about how to write a

22:51fantasy novel. It gives us an

22:54explanation of what it is. Um, here's

22:56some like different other types of

22:58fantasy, common tropes in fantasy

23:00novels, and it gives us a bulleted list

23:02of that steps to write a fantasy novel.

23:05This is this was all given in my

23:07outline. U, but looking through it, I

23:09can say, "Yeah, this is really well

23:10fleshed out. It's got plenty of content

23:12for each section and definitely goes

23:15through and gives me all of the things

23:17that I would be interested in." So, uh,

23:20pretty great job for Opus, uh, 4.6 on on

23:24this particular one. And I have found

23:25that the Claude models are probably the

23:27best ones for any kind of article

23:30writing. Uh, I personally use um, Claude

23:35Sonnet for a lot of those kind of

23:37things. All right, so that does it for

23:40the prompts here. My overall impressions

23:43of Claude Opus 4.6 is that it is not

23:47that much better. at all than 4.5, but

23:51that's not necessarily a bad thing. Um,

23:54it's you have to work with these things

23:57a lot more to really understand the

23:59subtle nuances of each model. But, uh,

24:02just as my first impressions, it's

24:04certainly not worse than 4.5.

24:07And I would be happy to just upgrade any

24:10of my automations or any of parts of my

24:12process where I used Opus 4.5. I'd be

24:16happy to upgrade it to 4.6 without

24:18really any fear of it getting worse or

24:21anything like that. Definitely something

24:23that's worth using in the creative

24:24spaces. All right, so those are my

24:26thoughts on Opus 4.6 six and I will see

24:29you in the in the next

More from The Nerdy Novelist

Recently added transcripts

Browse the whole transcript library

This transcript was generated from the captions YouTube publishes for this video. Get the transcript of any YouTube video atfreeyoutubetranscribe.com, free, unlimited, no sign-up.