Free YouTube Transcribe

Video transcript

I Tested Claude Opus 4.7 for Creative Writing, Here's Everything

The Nerdy Novelist · 4,686 words · 22 min read

Want to search this transcript, jump the video from any line, or download it as TXT, SRT, or VTT?

Open in the transcript tool

Full transcript

0:00Claude Opus 4.7 is out and as you know

0:02if you follow this channel, we love the

0:04Claude models here. We think they are

0:06some of the best at creative writing. Is

0:094.7 as good as 4.6 was or is it better

0:13or is it worse? That's what we're going

0:15to discover in this video. So let's just

0:18dive right in. All right. So as always I

0:20have a series of prompts that I run

0:22every model through. These prompts are

0:24intentionally simple to see how well

0:26these models perform out of the box

0:29without any complicated prompting or

0:31anything like that. There are few

0:33exceptions to this just so we can see

0:35the difference that it makes to have

0:36like a complex prompt with style info

0:39and all of this stuff versus a very

0:40simple prompt. But this first one that

0:43we do is the logline prompt. This is one

0:46where I ask it to have a Blake Snyder

0:48like logline for a bunch of epic

0:50fantasy. Why do I start with epic

0:52fantasy?

0:54Basically all my tests are around epic

0:56fantasy because A, it's what I like to

0:58write and is therefore something I'm

0:59more familiar with and B, AI seems to

1:02struggle with fantasy a little bit more.

1:04Things tend to be a little bit more

1:05cliche especially in the the language

1:07and the dialogue versus a contemporary

1:10thing which AI tends to be a lot better

1:12at. So I understand that if I can get it

1:14working well for fantasy, then it's

1:16probably going to work well for

1:17everything else.

1:19So anyway, logline prompt did okay.

1:21There were a couple in here that I've

1:23bolded here that I actually thought were

1:25pretty good. But there were a number of

1:27of really not so well thought out ideas.

1:31For instance, this one. A disgraced

1:33royal executioner cursed to feel the

1:35last memory of every soul she beheads

1:38must hunt the immortal sorcerer who

1:40murdered her family only to discover her

1:42blade cannot kill him without absorbing

1:44the one memory she spent a lifetime

1:46trying to forget. So there's like

1:47there's a bunch of stuff in here that's

1:48just like why is this the way it is? It

1:50just feels like a bunch of ideas sort of

1:53randomly mashed together that don't

1:55quite make sense with each other. Here's

1:56another one, a con man posing as the

1:59chosen one is swept up in a holy crusade

2:01against the demon lord he doesn't

2:03believe exists. Until he realizes the

2:05real chosen one died years ago and the

2:08prophecy was always meant for the liar

2:09who could sell hope to a dying world. So

2:11this one to also doesn't make sense. So

2:13we're saying that the real chosen one

2:15died years ago, but the prophecy was

2:16always meant for the liar meaning the

2:18liar is the real chosen one. So like

2:21clearly this one was not very well

2:23thought through by the AI. However,

2:25there are a couple of really good ones

2:26here I've highlighted. I thought this

2:27one was good. After her dragon bonds

2:29with her instead of her legendary

2:31warrior sister, which is great. I mean

2:33the dragon bonds thing is a little bit

2:34of a cliche at this point, but still

2:36that's that's a good start. A timid

2:38herbalist must ride into battle against

2:40an empire of dragon slayers not knowing

2:42that her gentle dragon is actually the

2:44exiled king of their species hiding from

2:47a war only she can force him to finish.

2:49So yeah, I thought that one was a decent

2:50idea. Obviously it's kind of simple. You

2:52need to add a lot more to it, but it's a

2:54good start. This one was also good. When

2:56a goddess of death falls in love with a

2:58mortal thief she grants him immortality

3:00to keep him forever forcing him to rob

3:02the pantheon itself to find the one

3:04artifact that can kill a god before her

3:06love erases what makes him human. So I

3:08thought this was a good one as well.

3:10Lots of like really good conflict for

3:12this thief character. And last but not

3:14least, I like this one here. A deaf

3:16swordswoman raised by assassins must

3:18infiltrate the singing court of the fae

3:20queen to steal a weapon that ended the

3:22last world, but the blade only answers

3:24to those who can hear it's song, which

3:26there's some good conflict there because

3:28she's deaf. And everyone who has ever

3:29listened has gone mad. So yeah, and

3:31there are a couple of good ones like

3:33that scattered throughout. Okay, but

3:34still a couple that I'm just like

3:37you could have thought that through a

3:38little bit better. The next one is the

3:39outline test prompt where I give it a

3:41big outline template and a pretty brief

3:45synopsis of a book and ask it to

3:48outline 40 chapters. And this is

3:50actually one area where I found that 4.7

3:53did, I think, worse than 4.6. And I have

3:56I have no idea why. Maybe it was just

3:57this particular

3:59version of it. First of all, the

4:00prologue didn't seem to have anything to

4:02do with the rest of the story. And one

4:04of the things I'm looking for in these

4:05really long outline prompts is

4:08introducing kind of random details that

4:10don't seem to matter that sort of come

4:12out of left field and then don't really

4:14they aren't really followed up on later.

4:16And I actually found quite a few of

4:17those in here. So, uh we have this

4:20protagonist named Lathen. Uh it's giving

4:21us his story and then in my instructions

4:24I asked it to give us a save the cat

4:25moment in the first chapter. And so, it

4:27gave me one, but this part was just

4:30totally random. It's just like, oh this

4:31thing's going on, this scene's going on,

4:33and then he randomly goes over here and

4:35gives food to these random people. And

4:37it didn't feel naturally part of the

4:40scene. It's just like, oh we got to go

4:42over here to get our save the check the

4:44box for the save the cat moment. So,

4:47that was an issue. And I didn't see that

4:49when I was testing 4.6. And there was

4:51another area here as well where there

4:54was a character, I think I highlighted

4:56it. Yeah, so Lathen goes to say goodbye

4:58to Pell's grandmother, a half-blind

4:59royal former royal nurse who once tended

5:02Lathen's mother, grabs his wrist with

5:04shocking strength. Your mother didn't

5:05die of fever, boy. She died of knowing

5:07and she was going to tell your father

5:09the day she collapsed. Pell pulls her

5:11away apologizing, she's senile, she

5:13raves, but Lathen is shaken. He looks at

5:16his mother's compass in his hand and for

5:17the first time wonders why Masklick had

5:19it. So, this is another example of just

5:21a random character introduced to sort of

5:24make this scene a little bit more edgy.

5:27And didn't really fit. Wasn't this

5:29character was not mentioned at all

5:31previous to this which which is an

5:33issue. So, not my favorite for the

5:35outline. It did complete the whole

5:36outline. It's a lot of words, but

5:40honestly, uh th- this is one area where

5:43to be honest, I found that the Sonnet

5:45models often do outlining better than

5:47the Opus models. So, this is just

5:49another reason to maybe not use Opus for

5:52outlining. All right. And when I say

5:54sauna is better than Opus, I mean

5:56specifically for outlining. I should

5:57make that clear. All right, let's move

5:58on to the basic prose prompt. This is

6:00where I give it just a quick description

6:02of a scene to start writing and I ask it

6:05to write around 500 words or so with no

6:08style information or anything like that.

6:09So, this is what it gave us and this is

6:13actually pretty good. There's a specific

6:15moment that I like to read a little bit.

6:17There were some lines that I'm just

6:19like, what is that supposed to mean?

6:22I'll get to one of those in a second.

6:23So, let's see. His boots, good boots,

6:26guild issue, sold for mountain scree and

6:28desert hard pan had split along the left

6:30heel and each foot falls into a fresh

6:32splinter of pain up his shin. He did not

6:34stop. He did not even slow. A

6:36cartographer learns early on that the

6:38land does not forgive hesitation and the

6:39thing that had taken his expedition

6:41forgave nothing at all. He crested a low

6:43ridge of shale and made the mistake as a

6:45man will of looking back. So far,

6:48decent, you know, not perfect but

6:50decent. They were closer than he had

6:51dared hope and farther than he had

6:53feared. Okay, this was the first line

6:54that made me like do a double take and

6:56I'm just like, what? First you try to

6:57work out what it is actually saying

6:59here. It's kind of a little tongue-tied,

7:01but when you look closer this line does

7:03not actually make sense. So, in this

7:05part of the scene he's being pursued by

7:07these zombie-like creatures and they

7:09were closer than he had dared to hope

7:11doesn't make sense. Why would he hope

7:12that they were close? And farther than

7:14he had feared. Also doesn't quite make

7:16sense. Now, you could swap that but it

7:18still wouldn't make sense. And then it

7:19tries to explain itself which in the

7:21arithmetic of the waste meant only that

7:22he was going to die but perhaps not in

7:24the next 10 minutes. Okay, that makes a

7:25little more sense. That doesn't actually

7:27line up with this line. Regardless, it's

7:29not a good line.

7:31So, got to be careful I guess for lines

7:33like that that don't actually make sense

7:34even though they might sound smart.

7:36Scattered across the ridge line behind

7:38him trading between the stones like like

7:40of ash given purpose came the hungry.

7:42There's a little AI-ism there, ash given

7:44purpose. That's an instance of an

7:47inanimate thing kind of given visation

7:50of some kind. He counted without meaning

7:51to, an old guild habit, numbering

7:53everything, and stopped counting at 24.

7:55There were always more behind those.

7:57They moved in that terrible stuttering

7:59way of theirs as though each joint

8:00received its orders a half second late

8:02from some distant and indifferent will.

8:05Their skin was the gray of the wasteland

8:06itself, the gray of weathered bone and

8:08old stone, and in the wailing light they

8:10seemed less like figures pursuing him

8:12than like pieces of the landscape he had

8:13decided finally to come for what walked

8:15that had decided finally to come for

8:17what walked upon it. So, okay, it's a

8:19little dramatic in a way that the Opus

8:21models have lately tended to be. I like

8:24the Opus models. I think they have good

8:26pros in general, but they're better used

8:29for important dramatic scenes like this

8:31one. This is a good example, but often

8:33it will have this sort of gravitas to it

8:35in more light scenes or light-hearted

8:38scenes that you just don't want. And uh

8:41too often, especially in fantasy, I just

8:42find it having this really serious tone,

8:44which I don't always want it to have.

8:46And there's a sort of sameness to

8:47everything, and has not changed here.

8:49But that said, this is not bad, and I

8:50think it is slightly better than what I

8:52was getting out of Opus 4.6. I did pull

8:54it up so I could read through it as I

8:56was preparing for this video, and I

8:58think it is a little bit better. But

9:00interestingly, when we get to the

9:01advanced pros prompt, this was really

9:03interesting to me. So, this is the same

9:05scene, but for this prompt, this is one

9:07of the few instances where I do add a

9:09lot of style information. I give it some

9:11samples of my own pros so it can like

9:13mimic that. And I actually found in this

9:16case, I think it actually made a

9:17difference. So, first of all, I'll just

9:19draw your attention to the more variety

9:23in the size of each paragraph. So,

9:25there's some with like three lines, one

9:27line, four lines, four lines, one line,

9:30three lines, one line, one line, two

9:32lines, one line,

9:33etc. There's plenty of white space,

9:35which you generally speaking want in

9:38good prose. Very often people can know

9:41if something is good prose just by

9:42looking at the paragraph structure. I'll

9:45show you the same one here that was

9:47created by Opus 4.6, same prompt, and

9:51you can see there's like a big chunk of

9:52text here. There's this one that's a

9:55little bit uh smaller, but in general

9:58there's like much larger chunks of text,

10:01and I would say not the same amount of

10:02variety. Also, it's shorter than what we

10:05get here from Opus 4.7. So, just looking

10:08at this, just from a purely visual

10:10standpoint, it looks better. But, then I

10:13actually went through and started

10:15reading it. Let's find that same moment.

10:17The wasteland at dusk plays tricks.

10:19Rocks became figures, figures became

10:20rocks. Haldred had learned the

10:22difference over 6 days of not sleeping.

10:24Uh these were figures scattered across

10:26the flat behind him stretched in a loose

10:28crescent from the dry riverbed to the

10:30ridgeline. They came on in that

10:32stuttering gait he'd have known in pitch

10:34dark. A stride a hitch, a jerk of the

10:36head like a bird checking for worms,

10:37another stride, gray skin blending into

10:40gray stone so thoroughly that he had

10:41counted them by their movement alone. 1

10:435 12, he lost count at 18 and started

10:46again and stopped at 24. More behind

10:49those had to be. No. So, we have a bit

10:51of dialogue here, uh which is not

10:53something I that was prompted for, but

10:55it probably picked that up from my

10:56examples that there was dialogue in the

10:58examples. The word came out of him flat.

11:00He turned his head west. The walls of

11:02Valden stood black against the dying sun

11:04maybe 2 mi off, maybe less. Watch fires

11:07already lit along the battlements. He

11:08could see the shape of the south gate,

11:10the wedge of lamplight where the wicket

11:11still stood open. He knew the ordinance.

11:13Every child in Valden knew it. When the

11:15hungry come within a league of the

11:17walls, the gates are sealed. No

11:18exceptions, no petitioners, no returning

11:20sons. A little bit of an AI-ism there

11:22with the

11:23the repeat three times there. Uh it's

11:25not It's actually kind of a uh it's a

11:27sign of good writing, but AI overuses

11:29it. Captain Voss had read it aloud in

11:31the market square Every Equinoxan of

11:33Haldir's childhood and the watch

11:34enforced it with crossbows. The nearest

11:36of the hungry jerked its head up and

11:37fixed on him. Even at this distance, he

11:39felt it. Haldir wiped the blood off his

11:41palms onto his ruined coat. "Got to

11:43try," he muttered. "Got to." He ran.

11:45Still some issues in there, of course.

11:47I'm not going to say anything is perfect

11:48here, but that is significantly better

11:51prose. And this is what I'm hoping is

11:53the case here is that Opus 4.7 is more

11:56responsive to additional prompting and

12:00giving it examples and all of this stuff

12:02to try and make it better. This is one

12:03thing I've noticed. In the past, the

12:05Claude models write better out of the

12:07box, but often don't conform to your

12:10style as well. Whereas my other favorite

12:13for prose, which is Gemini 3.1, doesn't

12:16write as good out of the box, but when

12:18you give it tons of examples and style

12:20info and all of that, it will follow

12:22your instructions better and conform to

12:24that style more. So, it's kind of this

12:26balance of like which one do you want to

12:27work with? This is, in my opinion,

12:30better at conforming to style

12:33information and prompting. Uh there's

12:34certainly I like I'm sure if you

12:36compared that to the uh the first

12:39example where there wasn't any of that

12:41information, it's certainly a lot better

12:43than that. All right, so let's check a

12:45another example. This is a scene with

12:47more dialogue in it. And once again,

12:49this is not a very um not giving it a

12:53whole lot of style examples for this

12:56one. It's just a very simple prompt, but

12:58it's a scene with dialogue. So, let's

13:00check it out. So, Store finally lifted

13:02his eyes. They were tired eyes, iron

13:03gray and weathered like the stones of

13:05the outer keep, and they regarded

13:06Laythan with a particular weariness a

13:08man reserves for arguments he has

13:09already had a hundred times. Some

13:11AI-isms in there, but it's not bad. The

13:13law's the law, Laythan. The law is

13:14whatever you say it is, Laythan stepped

13:16closer. Close enough that the nearest

13:17guard shifted a hand toward the pommel

13:19at his hip. You wear the crown, you

13:21write the edicts. Uh by the way, that

13:22was that's a nice detail there that the

13:24guard shifted. If you wanted that gate

13:26open tonight, it would have been open.

13:29Ah, there it is. The voice came from the

13:31shadows of the pillar to the king's

13:32right, smooth, unhurried, and faintly

13:35amused, the way a tutor might sound

13:36indulging a child who had just

13:38discovered arithmetic. Argyle stepped

13:40into the lamplight, robes whispering

13:42against the flagstones, his long fingers

13:43folded neatly before him. All right, I

13:46like this actually. The ah, there it is

13:48line, I've never seen that in my tests

13:50before, and I just think it's kind of

13:53fits the scene pretty well. And I could

13:55go on, but I suffice it to say this was

13:57a good scene overall. I felt it was

13:59better than the basic prose prompt.

14:01Granted it has dialogue. Claude is

14:03usually okay with dialogue. So yeah,

14:05good job. Next we have the editing prose

14:07template. I give it this exact same

14:08scene actually, but it was written by

14:10Claude 2 from way way back when, and ask

14:14it to improve that scene. So if we read

14:16a little bit here, let's see. The law is

14:18yours to break. Lathen's voice cracked

14:20like a whip across the hall. You are the

14:22king. One word from you and those gates

14:23open. One word and a man still breathes

14:25this morning. One word, said a softer

14:27voice, and a thousand do not. Again,

14:29great line. That was not in the original

14:31text there. Argyle emerged from the

14:32shadows behind the throne as he always

14:33did, that brown robe whispering over

14:35stone, those long pale hands folded

14:37before him like a priest at prayer.

14:38Lathen's jaw tightened at the sight of

14:39him. The laws exist for a reason, young

14:41prince. Argyle's smile never quite

14:42reached his eyes. They are the walls

14:44behind the walls. They are why Varlden

14:46yet stands while the world beyond her

14:47gates feeds the hungry. I actually think

14:50that this is a major improvement on the

14:53original text in such a way like very

14:55often I'll run this prompt and the

14:57response I get back still retains a

14:59whole bunch of the stuff I don't like

15:01about the original text. This one

15:03doesn't. This one almost completely

15:04rewrote the scene. It still has the same

15:06beats, but it's written more in Opus 4.7

15:10style rather than preserving a lot of

15:12what made the original not so great. And

15:14so this is the first time I've actually

15:16read this and I think this is almost as

15:18good as if I were to just rewrite it

15:19from scratch as I did, you know, like we

15:22did in this previous test, almost as

15:24good. Like, I would be okay with this

15:26with just a little editing, you know?

15:28That's great. So, I was pleasantly

15:29surprised with that. All right, moving

15:31on to ad headlines. These I was also

15:33pretty pleasantly surprised with. Now,

15:35just looking at them, they are still a

15:36little long. I complain about this a

15:38lot. Most of the models will have very

15:40long headlines unless instructed to do

15:42otherwise. And again, I keep these

15:44prompts very simple to see how they do

15:46without massive amounts of instruction.

15:48But, some of these, even though they are

15:50long, were genuinely good hooks. Like,

15:51he believed the lies for 20 years. One

15:53night outside the mountain changed

15:54everything. Three races rule this dying

15:57world. None of them are human. All of

15:58them want him dead. I think this is a

16:00good way to just create that curiosity

16:02gap there. What if the Count of Monte

16:03Cristo had zombies, shadow demons, and a

16:05hive queen? You know, like, that's

16:07great. There was another one here. And

16:08it it took several different approaches

16:11to the hook, so it wasn't all about this

16:14betrayal that happens in the story.

16:16There's this one, "Fantasy fans who love

16:17The Count of Monte Cristo are obsessed

16:19with this new series." That's one I

16:21could genuinely see that running on meta

16:24using meta ads or on Amazon ads. Like, I

16:27could genuinely see something like that

16:29running. Uh so, really great job. I did

16:31check out the ad headlines that Opus 4.6

16:34gave me, and they were not good by

16:37comparison. Like, this is actually a

16:38pretty big leap from 4.6 to 4.7 when it

16:41comes to the vanilla ability to do ad

16:44headlines. Like this one, "Three races,

16:46a zombie plague, one exiled prince, and

16:48a truth that changes everything he

16:49thought he knew." Like, that's just the

16:50way that's phrased, it's just not it's

16:52not a really great hook. So, I was

16:54really impressed with the quality of the

16:56ad headlines. Similarly, the email

16:58newsletter prompt, where I asked it to

17:00write an email announcing the release of

17:02this book, was pretty good as well. It

17:04did not overdo things. It kind of

17:07covered all of the main points in

17:09exactly the amount of succinctness that

17:12I would want without going overboard.

17:13And it's pretty good. Like, "I've got

17:14news I've been sitting on for a while

17:16and I can finally share it. My new epic

17:17fantasy novel, The Crown of Hunger,

17:19releases on December 21st. This one has

17:21been a labor of love. Imagine The Count

17:22of Monte Cristo, but dropped into a

17:24brutal fantasy world where betrayal is

17:25only the beginning of the protagonist's

17:27problems. Here's the pitch. And then it

17:29gives us a little bit more in-depth

17:31right here. If you've been waiting for a

17:32revenge story with teeth, this is the

17:34one. Pre-order The Crown of Hunger here.

17:36Thank you as always for reading. I can't

17:38wait to put this book in your hands.

17:40Signed, your name. All right, and that

17:41was pretty good. All right, last but not

17:42least is my SEO article super prompt

17:46where I give it a massive prompt that

17:48has examples of articles about how to

17:51write a fantasy novel. I ask it to write

17:53one. I ask it to write 4,000 words. Now,

17:56writing a good article is something that

17:58most AI models can do these days. So,

18:01the main thing I'm actually looking for

18:03when I do this is does it seem well

18:05organized? And so far, you know, it

18:08looks like it is. We have a good section

18:10on what is a fantasy novel. It talks

18:13about subgenres here. Common tropes in

18:15fantasy novels, it goes through those.

18:18Steps to write a fantasy novel, and then

18:20in the smaller heading it go it starts

18:23with identify your audience, right? You

18:25know, it's the layout's good. The the

18:27amount of visual variety is good. Uh but

18:31the main thing I'm looking for is did it

18:33write roughly the 4,000 words that I

18:35asked it to write in the prompt? And in

18:38this case, it did not. It wrote 3,149,

18:42which is close, but not quite. Now, if

18:44we compare that to Opus 4.6

18:47with what it wrote for me, that one

18:49wrote 4,500. So, maybe this is just the

18:52the prompt in this case it just didn't

18:53do it. But for some reason in this case

18:55it seems to have gone back a little bit.

18:58That said, that could just be because

19:00it's being a little bit more succinct.

19:01Maybe the writing has improved. But

19:03still, it's more than 1,000 words less.

19:05So, that's not what I asked for.

19:07Regardless, it's still a decent article

19:09and I'd be okay publishing something

19:11like this with a little editing, right?

19:13And those are all of my prompts. So, as

19:16far as my own bottom line for this, I do

19:19think it's an improvement on Opus 4.6. I

19:21know a lot of people think that Claude

19:23was throttling 4.6 somehow, making it

19:26worse so that when they released 4.7 it

19:28would feel like this big leap. My

19:30initial prompts that I did the test that

19:32I did for 4.6, I did back when 4.6 came

19:35out, and I've since compared it to 4.7

19:37and I'd say definitely for sure 4.7 is

19:41an improvement over 4.6. Usually, I

19:43don't see a huge improvement. Usually,

19:45it's just like, "Eh, it feels kind of

19:46the same, but sure, like there's nothing

19:48really bad about the new version, might

19:50as well upgrade." I do actually believe

19:52that this is a significant improvement

19:54over 4.6 in most areas. The only area

19:57where I thought it actually got

19:59potentially worse was in the outline and

20:01the the SEO article super prompt, which

20:04keep in mind, those are some of the

20:05biggest prompts that I have, so perhaps

20:08that factors into things. But given

20:10especially how improved

20:13the scene was when I gave it all of that

20:15style info and everything, that to me

20:17was a big one. To see it actually

20:19conform to the prompt a little bit more

20:22was important to me and follow style and

20:24all of that. So, that's huge one for me.

20:27I personally don't put any faith into

20:29these claims that these AI companies are

20:32making their old models worse in order

20:34to make the new ones look better. I

20:36certainly wouldn't put it past some of

20:37these companies to do something like

20:39that, but the reason I don't think

20:40that's actually happening is because I

20:42always go back and look at what I

20:44originally got when I ran these tests,

20:46and indeed, it was as bad as people are

20:49saying it is now back then. But the

20:51thing is, we've had all of this time to

20:54get used to that model, so suddenly it's

20:56not going to feel as special anymore,

20:58and that's why I think it's the shifting

21:00baseline syndrome, where our baseline

21:03for what we think is quality keeps going

21:05up, and therefore, as it goes up things

21:09are going to start feeling worse. So for

21:10that reason I don't actually put that

21:13much faith into it because it doesn't

21:14jive with the experience I have looking

21:16back at past tests and being like, "Man,

21:18why did I think this was good at the

21:20time?" So that's just something to keep

21:22in mind, but I do think this was a

21:24a solid model. And certainly if you've

21:26been using Opus 4.6 in the past at any

21:29step in your writing process, I think

21:31you will not be in danger of upgrading

21:33to 4.7 at least in most cases. Be sure

21:36to do run your own tests and we'll see

21:37how this thing does with long-term

21:39testing, but for now I think this is

21:40great. So if you like this, be sure to

21:43check out my membership below where we

21:45have the entire writing process

21:47available for you to check out and lots

21:49of genre guides to make sure you get

21:50started with the right style and the

21:52right tropes and everything to get you

21:55on your best feet when it comes to

21:58actually publishing your books. So go

21:59check that out and I will see you in the

22:01next video.

More from The Nerdy Novelist

Recently added transcripts

Browse the whole transcript library

This transcript was generated from the captions YouTube publishes for this video. Get the transcript of any YouTube video atfreeyoutubetranscribe.com, free, unlimited, no sign-up.