Free YouTube Transcribe

Video transcript

AI Authors Make MORE Than Non-AI Authors?

The Nerdy Novelist · 3,238 words · 15 min read

Want to search this transcript, jump the video from any line, or download it as TXT, SRT, or VTT?

Open in the transcript tool

Full transcript

0:00There's some exciting new developments

0:01in a brand new survey that's giving us

0:03some shocking news about how people are

0:06using AI in their work, including some

0:09news that people who use AI might

0:11actually make more money than those who

0:13don't, but maybe not for the reasons you

0:15think. So, in this video, we're going to

0:17dive deep into the survey results here,

0:19as well as an interview with uh some of

0:22the people that ran these the survey uh

0:24that I thought was fascinating. Some

0:26really great sound bites there. So,

0:28let's dive into that and uh let's go.

0:30All right. So, I first want to highlight

0:32this newsletter from this is a paid

0:34newsletter from Jane Freriedman. And

0:36she's not sponsoring this video, nor do

0:38I have an affiliate link for her, but

0:40I'm going to strongly recommend anybody

0:43who's serious about having a career in

0:45publishing uh or even in

0:47self-publishing, you should definitely

0:49subscribe to her newsletter. And there

0:50is a free version here, but I kind of

0:53recommend going at the uh $80 a year uh

0:57level because you're going to get tons

0:58of really valuable advice every week.

1:01And if you just want to keep your pulse

1:02on the industry, it's like a fantastic

1:04way to do it. And again, not sponsored,

1:06no affiliate link, uh but uh I it's just

1:10something I strongly recommend. I had

1:12access to it when I worked at

1:13Kindlepreneur and I liked it so much

1:15that when I left Kindlepreneur to start

1:17this channel, I subscribed to it myself.

1:21Um, so that just tells you something

1:23there. Uh, so out of respect for the

1:26fact that this is a paid newsletter, I'm

1:27only going to give you some of the

1:28highlights from her email. Um, but

1:32there's some really interesting things

1:33in there. And then we'll go actually

1:35look at the actual survey, which is

1:36free, and I'll link to that down below

1:38as well. All of that's available and you

1:40can uh you can get it and uh take take a

1:43look for yourself. So all right u so

1:46this is some of what was in her

1:47newsletter about this uh huge survey. So

1:51uh this is examined a large

1:52cross-section of writers about their

1:54attitudes toward AI. Josh Bernoff and

1:57Gotham Ghost writers who have extensive

1:59experience with survey design and data

2:00analysis ran the survey. They collected

2:03nearly 1500 responses from working

2:04writers. Of these about 300 were fiction

2:07writers. Okay. So fiction is a small

2:11subset of all writers generally. Um but

2:15that's still a decent number of people

2:18to get responses from. She also notes

2:20that Bookbub conducted a similar survey

2:22and I remember when this went out it

2:23actually generated quite a bit of

2:24chatter online uh where they reached out

2:27tound to,200 writers and they found in

2:31that survey that writers were about 45%

2:34of writers were using AI in some

2:36capacity and uh she points out some

2:38comments that she saw which I thought

2:40were kind of hilarious like this one. I

2:42don't believe it. Every author I know

2:43hates AI with a passion. Uh, so this

2:46person clearly lives in a bubble and I

2:48unsubscribed from bookmail bookbub

2:50emails because of this which I think

2:52like really like they were just

2:55collecting data. Like this just goes to

2:56show that people will ignore all

2:58empirical data if it doesn't align with

3:00their worldview. But anyway, she notes

3:03here that for those who still doubt or

3:04disbelieve this new survey should

3:06provide ample evidence that AI is being

3:08used by many writers across all sectors,

3:10Bookbub's survey was not a fluke. More

3:13than 60% of writers in this new survey

3:15use AI at least sometimes and 25% use it

3:18daily 25%. So this is not just a small

3:23niche like we uh pe people are using AI

3:26a lot. So here are some of the key

3:28findings. Um how writers feel about AI

3:30depends almost entirely on how much they

3:33use it. More than half of advanced AI

3:35users think that AI is a positive force

3:37for the profession and that it is has

3:38improved their career prospects. But

3:40only 3% of non-users agree. And there's

3:43a graph that uh I'll show you in a

3:45second that shows that. And uh there

3:47I've been saying this for years. Um if

3:50you hate AI, it's probably because you

3:53haven't used it.

3:55You should try using it. You should see

3:57where in your business you can try and

3:59apply it. There's going to be something

4:01in your business that you don't like

4:03that AI can do better, and it will take

4:05time off of your hands. Just saying. Uh,

4:08the most advanced AI users have higher

4:10incomes. This is probably the most in

4:12exciting statistic here, although it's

4:14maybe not what you think. There is

4:15definitely uh correlation does not equal

4:18causation here. Um, but I'll get into

4:21that when we get into the interview that

4:23she shows, but um it does show that

4:27advanced AI users have a median income

4:29of 12 or of 120,000 a year, which is 64%

4:33higher than non-users.

4:36So there may be a reason why you might

4:38want to be thinking about using AI. Um

4:42because even if it's not correlated or

4:44even if it's not causation, there is a

4:47correlation and we want to examine what

4:48that correlation is because perhaps you

4:51want to get more of what that

4:52correlation entails to help you in your

4:55business. Okay. Uh and then fiction

4:57writers who don't use AI hate it, which

5:00doesn't surprise anybody here. Uh,

5:02fiction writers were analyzed separately

5:04in a survey because their business

5:05models differ from that of other types

5:06of writers. Of the fiction group, 42%

5:09use AI at least sometimes, which more

5:11closely mirrors the bookbub survey

5:13results. But non-users were nearly

5:15unanimous in their disgust for the

5:17technology. Fiction authors using AI

5:19shared some of the same concerns about

5:20the technology as young non-users, but

5:23to a lesser extent. uh which I can agree

5:26like I think and just because we use AI

5:29doesn't mean we are uh completely

5:33optimistic about everything like there's

5:34definitely some reason to be concerned

5:36especially because this is such a fast

5:38growing thing

5:40but definitely to a much lesser extent

5:42for me personally I have very little

5:43fears around the future with AI very

5:46very little um here's that graph

5:48correlating how uh your attitude towards

5:50AI versus how much you use it so clearly

5:53as the more you use it the more likely

5:56your attitude is going to go up. So

5:59please people, if you are upset about

6:02AI, if you fear AI, people fear what

6:04they don't understand. Maybe try to

6:07understand it a little bit. All right.

6:08So Jane Freriedman ended up speaking

6:10with Bernoff via Zoom about some of

6:12these data points. And so this is an

6:15interview that's been edited and

6:16condensed for publication. And there's

6:18some really interesting gems in here

6:19that I want to talk about. For instance,

6:21this quote here from Bernoff I thought

6:22was really interesting. He said now

6:23looking at the people who haven't used

6:25it and aren't knowledgeable about it. I

6:27spent 20 years as a technology analyst.

6:29I watched all these technologies come in

6:32and this is the way it this is always

6:34the way it is. People have all sorts of

6:36emotional reactions when the web came in

6:39and e-commerce came in and mobile

6:40devices. We've heard the story over and

6:42over again. The difference this time is

6:45that the speed of technology advance in

6:47AI is an order of magnitude faster than

6:49anything else I've ever seen. And it's

6:51more universal. E-commerce only affected

6:53people buying things in retail. This

6:55affects everything, every job and every

6:57activity. So, of course, people are

6:58afraid and ignorant because, you know,

7:00the smartest people in the field of AI

7:02don't understand all the implications,

7:03let alone some person who's like, "Oh,

7:05yeah, I heard that it does this thing."

7:07Uh, and this is something I've been

7:08saying literally since the beginning,

7:11right? Um, this is no different than any

7:14technological advancement before. And

7:16there will come a time when people will

7:19scratch their heads on why anybody had

7:21any problem with this technological

7:22advancement when it came. But that's

7:24probably years down the line before we

7:26get to that point. Um, but we are

7:28getting to that point like every

7:30technological advancement has faced the

7:33same skepticism. But he's right in the

7:35fact that the advancement the level of

7:38advancement happening this time is much

7:40much faster. And so that makes it even

7:43scarier than in the past. But I don't

7:46think it changes the fact that

7:49this has happened before and it'll all

7:50happen again and it's not going to

7:53change much in the long term. Um, we're

7:56just going to see the we're going to see

7:58some instability while things normalize

8:02and while industries normalize to these

8:04things, but eventually we'll reach

8:06another stable plane where like we're

8:09all just using these tools and it's just

8:11normal, right? and then we'll be

8:14spending much more of our time doing

8:16things that we couldn't do before

8:17because we were too tied up doing the

8:19things that AI is now doing for us. That

8:21sort of thing. This quote was also very

8:23interesting. He says, "There has to be

8:25an enormous amount of effort put into

8:26the smart ways, the right ways to use

8:29this. We'll get there, but it's going to

8:31be ugly, especially for content

8:32organizations, for publishers. There's

8:34evidence that they're basically just

8:36throwing AI at the problem in hopes that

8:37it will make everything more efficient,

8:39and that's a terrible idea. There has to

8:41be a real reckoning with what is the

8:42right way for creative people to use

8:43these tools. And this is what I've been

8:45trying to do ever since I started this

8:47channel was to teach people the right

8:49way to use these tools. Ways that

8:51harness your creativity instead of

8:53trying to replace them. That using it as

8:55a productivity tool and not as a

8:57replacement tool. Uh that's that's been

8:59my whole dream, my whole goal from the

9:02very beginning. And I think we have

9:04found a lot of good ways uh what I would

9:07call what he would call the right ways

9:08for creative people to use these tools.

9:11And we're still figuring it out. So

9:12we're certainly not going to be perfect,

9:13but uh that has always been the goal.

9:16All right, so let's talk about the the

9:18increase in income for people who have

9:21who are using AI. Um so Jane says, "The

9:25other standout finding for me was that

9:26the most advanced AI users have higher

9:28incomes than non-users. Why do you think

9:30that is?" And then he says, "That's a

9:32really hard question. You know, this is

9:33a classic example of correlation is not

9:35causation." I'm speculating here because

9:38it's difficult to tease this kind of

9:39information out of the survey data, but

9:41I think that if you are a freelance

9:43writer or a freelancer doing content

9:45marketing or a business author or

9:46anybody who is now making 120,000 or

9:49150,000 or 180,000 as a writer, at that

9:52level, things that can make you more

9:54efficient are extremely valuable. So

9:58yes, it's not surprising to me that

10:00those people would look and say, "Oh,

10:01well, if I can get really good at this,

10:03I can save myself time and energy in the

10:04work that I'm doing. I'm ghostwriting a

10:06book right now with an expert on a

10:08startup company." So, he's very forward

10:10focused on technology. And when we have

10:12a task to do and I do not use AI, he

10:14gets upset about how wasteful I'm being

10:16of my time. He's like, "You could have

10:18just had chat GBT or Claude give you the

10:20answer to that." uh which definitely we

10:22don't want to overuse AI in cases where

10:24the human can can and should be doing it

10:27better but there are more ways that

10:30people realize that AI can do just fine

10:34and when you use it it frees up your

10:36time to do other things to continue on

10:38he says a significant finding though is

10:40that most intense users of AI are the

10:42most likely to say that it has increased

10:44their income these people are certainly

10:46telling you that this is a tool that has

10:48made it possible for them to make more

10:49money for anyone one who's wondering if

10:51they should be trying this out. That's a

10:52pretty important finding and I agree.

10:54The people who are really good at the

10:56work they do as writers can now be more

10:58efficient. And the people who weren't

10:59that good and weren't doing the work

11:00that was relatively wrote work, well,

11:03you know, it's not going to be a really

11:04good time for these folks. And again,

11:05I've been saying this, oh my gosh, I've

11:08been saying this for uh at least a year

11:10or two. I've said it in presentations

11:13that the the people who are hard workers

11:16and uh are dialed into their creativity

11:19and have practice and experience versus

11:22a person who has none of those things.

11:24If they both use AI, the person with all

11:27of the experience and the creativity and

11:29all of that is always always going to do

11:33better than the person who doesn't even

11:35if they're using the same tools. Like

11:37it's just it's just I don't know why

11:38people don't get this. Like it it's

11:41obvious to me like if you're a level 10

11:43writer versus a level two writer and you

11:46use AI, AI might be able to double your

11:49input and your and um and your u ability

11:53as a writer, but that means you're now a

11:55level 20 writer and the other person is

11:56a level four writer. You know, like it's

11:59still important to get that experience

12:02and to spend time doing creative tasks

12:05and all of that stuff because it will

12:06help you in the long term. But AI is

12:08just there to make you more efficient at

12:10what you already do. So those were the

12:12highlights from uh from this newsletter

12:15and the interview there. I wanted to

12:16actually look at the actual survey here.

12:19Um so I'll link to this down below. You

12:20can go and look through it. One of the

12:23interesting things for me with this

12:25graph which showed how people were using

12:27it. Um so the number this is of course

12:30among the people the the 60 plus percent

12:33of people that were using AI. this is

12:36how they were using it. Um, number one

12:39was to suggest possible titles or

12:41headings, which I thought was

12:42interesting. Uh, number two was as a

12:45replacement for web search, which 71%.

12:48Uh, and I got to admit, like although I

12:51use AI for a lot of things, as a

12:53replacement for web search is probably

12:54the number one thing, the thing that I

12:57am using most often. Uh, to brainstorm

13:00is very high, which makes sense. uh to

13:02find appropriate words or phrases for a

13:03concept you're describing also makes

13:05sense for other forms of research to

13:07generate text content that you then edit

13:09further. And this is probably what in in

13:12our story hacker community and in the

13:15methods that I teach, this is probably

13:16what we do the most when writing uh

13:19books is that it's not again it's a

13:22productivity tool, not a replacement

13:23tool. We we are trying to get ideas and

13:27have it get 80% of the way there so we

13:30can then efficiently take it the the

13:32remaining 20%. To summarize articles and

13:34papers or other content. Yep. That's

13:36something AI is really good at. To

13:37generate outlines also. Well, AI is not

13:41as good at that, but it it can do okay

13:44when when prompted correctly by someone

13:46who knows what they're doing and who uh

13:49gives it plenty of guidance to find

13:51flaws and inconsistency in what you

13:52write. Yep, it can do that. to generate

13:54article or blog post ideas. So, more on

13:57the brainstorming there. As a devil's

13:59advocate, to find weaknesses in what you

14:01write, which I thought was an

14:02interesting one, particularly if you're

14:03into some kind of like business or

14:04persuasive writing. That could be really

14:06interesting. For deep research reports,

14:09to analyze numerical or quantitative

14:11data. Yeah, it's really great for that

14:13kind of stuff. To analyze textual data,

14:15aka survey responses. Yeah, that's

14:18great. To assess the reading level of

14:20what you have written. to create

14:22illustrations or artwork to accompany

14:24what you write. To manage and or format

14:26sources, links, and footnotes, to do

14:29numerical calculations, and now we're

14:30getting into stuff that not a lot of

14:31people are doing, to create software

14:33code or apps. To create text content

14:34that's then published without

14:36significant editing, which is only 1%.

14:38So, a lot of people think that when we

14:41talk about writing a book with AI, they

14:43they think that it's a button that we

14:45push and then we publish the results and

14:46that's what we're done with. Only 1% are

14:49doing that. and and and I would not

14:51advocate for that at all because like I

14:53said, anybody with the experience who

14:56actually applies their craft to the use

14:58of AI, they're always going to do better

15:01than the Joe Schmo who's just pumping

15:04out content with AI and then publishing

15:06it. You're you're never going to get

15:08good results out of that compared to the

15:10person who actually puts in a little

15:11effort, even a little effort.

15:13So, it's nice to see that of all of

15:15these people who are using AI, most of

15:16them are using AI in genuinely helpful

15:19ways and not in the what I would

15:22describe here as you know generating

15:24content without specific without

15:26significant editing. Like that's the

15:28kind of thing uh that people are doing

15:30that are not going to find success and

15:32it looks like most of the people who are

15:34using AI are not doing that. So, that's

15:36good. So, there's a lot of interesting

15:37things in here like AI powered writers

15:39are sure they're more productive. a lot

15:41of cool findings. Heavy AI users have

15:43more positive attitudes toward it. So,

15:45yeah, I definitely recommend that you

15:46check that out and uh see what you can

15:49find in there that that's interesting.

15:51It's not all, you know, roses and

15:54everything cuz um there are some things

15:56in there. There there's definite

15:57concerns even among those people that

15:58are using AI to who who think that there

16:02are potential problems in the future. I

16:04find it best not to speculate about the

16:05future. I know that in terms of uh the

16:08way markets work and everything,

16:09everything always equals out eventually

16:11and you just kind of the the best way to

16:14be able to uh insulate yourself against

16:17the shaky time before we get to market

16:20stabilization

16:22is to actually embrace these tools and

16:24become an expert in them because that

16:25makes you it gives you a much higher

16:28likelihood that you'll be employable,

16:31right? So, that's just my thoughts

16:33there. Uh, hopefully this was

16:35interesting to you.

More from The Nerdy Novelist

Recently added transcripts

Browse the whole transcript library

This transcript was generated from the captions YouTube publishes for this video. Get the transcript of any YouTube video atfreeyoutubetranscribe.com, free, unlimited, no sign-up.