Free YouTube Transcribe

Video transcript

Russia Is Planning To Beat America To Bitcoin (CLARITY Act)

Joe Consorti · 4,194 words · 20 min read

Want to search this transcript, jump the video from any line, or download it as TXT, SRT, or VTT?

Open in the transcript tool

Full transcript

Russia Moved. America Has 15 Days.

0:00Earlier this week, the Russian

0:01Parliament passed a law making Bitcoin

0:03legal for foreign trade. So, the country

0:05under the heaviest sanctions regime in

0:07modern history now has a legal route for

0:09cross-border trade that runs outside of

0:12the US dollar system. And 2 days later,

0:14the United States Senate released its

0:16own version of that law, but within 6

0:18hours, the senators whose votes decide

0:20whether it passes or not said it that it

0:22wasn't good enough. While Washington

0:24spent this week arguing over who gets to

0:25sue the president, Russia quietly built

0:27a legal channel for moving money across

0:29borders without asking for the United

0:31States permission. And that may end up

0:33mattering more to Bitcoin over the next

0:35decade than anything that the Senate

0:37does in the next couple of weeks.

0:39Because this week, the president of the

0:40United States went on camera and said

0:43this.

0:43>> The United States never settles for

0:45second, and we don't under this

0:47administration, I can tell you that. You

0:49see that cuz we have the hottest country

0:51right now anywhere in the world. We live

0:52by the motto, "America first." That's

0:54what's made us very strong, and we're

0:56leading China and all other countries by

0:58a lot in AI and just about every other

1:01category, including crypto. We want to

1:03stay in front in crypto. They'd love to

1:05take that over.

1:06>> We want to stay in front. That is the

1:08sitting president framing Bitcoin as a

1:10race against China and all of our other

1:12enemies out loud on tape while the

What This Video Covers

1:15Senate spends its last two working weeks

1:17of the year fighting over who gets to

1:19enforce an ethics rule against the

1:20president who already agreed to it.

1:22Here's what nobody covering this is

1:24telling you, and it's the whole reason

1:26that I'm actually making this video.

1:27What happens in the next 15 days decides

1:30whether America writes the rules for

1:32Bitcoin or spends the next 4 years

The Starting Gun

1:35living with somebody else's. And for

1:36Bitcoin specifically, it matters far

1:39more than anyone is telling you. So, by

1:41the end of this video, you're going to

1:42understand exactly what Russia did this

1:44week, why the seven votes that decide

1:46this bill are being held over a rule

1:48that expires in 2029, and why one number

1:51in the president's own financial

1:53disclosure explains Bitcoin better than

1:55any bill that Congress could write. And

1:57you're going to understand why this

1:58could very well be the starting gun for

2:00Bitcoin's next bull market. Three

2:02things. First, what actually happened in

2:05Washington because the headline and the

2:07reality are two different stories.

2:09Second, what Russia did and why the

2:11world's most sanctioned economy just

2:13made a move that should make every

2:15American policy maker nervous. And

2:16third, the part that actually matters

2:19for your portfolio, which is what

2:21Bitcoin does regardless of which way

2:23this vote goes. Let's get into it. So, I

2:25want to give you a frame before I give

2:27you a single number because without it

2:28the next 15 minutes are just political

2:30noise. Back in June, Senator Cynthia

2:32Lummis, the woman who has been

2:33negotiating this bill since Labor Day of

2:35last year, and the woman responsible for

2:37trying to purchase 1 million Bitcoin for

2:39the US strategic Bitcoin Reserve, said

2:41something that almost nobody picked up

2:42on. She said that the Clarity Act is not

2:45the finish line. It is the starting gun.

2:48I want you to sit with that for a second

2:49because she was more right than she knew

2:51and probably not in the way that she

2:52meant it. A starting gun doesn't

2:53actually decide who wins. It doesn't

2:55decide who's fastest or who trained

2:57hardest or who's got the better shoes.

2:59All it does is tell you that the race

3:01has begun. And here's the thing about a

3:03starting gun. It fires whether or not

What Actually Dropped This Week

3:05you're at the line. And Russia heard it

3:07this week. Asia is at the blocks and the

3:09United States is still in the locker

3:11room arguing about the rule book.

3:13Remember that image because I'm going to

3:14come back to it a couple of times

3:15throughout this video and when I do,

3:17it's going to mean something completely

3:18different than it might to you right

3:19now. So, here's what actually happened

3:22and why it's so important for Bitcoin.

3:23Senate Republicans released updated text

3:25of the Clarity Act. This is the market

3:27structure bill. It's the thing that

3:28decides whether the SEC or the CFTC

3:31regulates Bitcoin and whether you have a

3:33codified legal right to actually hold

3:35your own Bitcoin and whether the last

3:36decade of regulation by enforcement

3:38actually gets replaced with actual law.

3:41The House passed its version a year ago,

3:43294 to 194, and it's been sitting in the

3:46Senate ever since. The single thing

3:48blocking it has been ethics.

3:50Specifically, whether a sitting

3:52president who personally earned more

3:54than $1.4 billion

3:56from crypto ventures in 2025 should be

3:59allowed to keep doing that. That number

4:00deserves a second glance. $1.4 billion.

4:04For context, Coinbase, the largest

4:06publicly traded crypto company in

4:08America, earned $1.6 billion in net

4:11income the same year. So, the president

4:13personally outearned the entire company.

4:16And this week, the bill was revised with

4:18ethics language in it. And guess what?

4:20The president signed off on it himself.

4:22It bans any covered individual, and that

4:24explicitly includes the president, and

4:26vice president, members of Congress, and

4:27federal judges from issuing or

4:29sponsoring a digital asset for

4:31consideration. It imposes a $250,000

4:34fine per violation per day for exchanges

4:37that list one, as well as full

4:39disgorgement of profits plus a penalty

4:41equal to 10% of everything received. So,

4:43the long and the short of it is that it

4:45basically bans politicians from issuing

4:47crypto. The Polymarket odds that the

4:49crypto the act passes this year ran all

4:51the way up to 70%. And as a result,

4:54Bitcoin jumped roughly 3% on the day

4:56yesterday. But then, that same night,

4:58seven Democrats killed momentum. And

5:01this is the part that requires you to

5:02understand one piece of Senate

5:04machinery. And I'm going to make it as

5:05painless as I can because everything

5:07downstream that's going to happen to

5:09Bitcoin over the next several months

The Seven Votes That Decide It

5:10might depend on it. To pass anything in

5:12the Senate, you don't need 51 votes. You

5:15need 60. 60 votes to end debate and to

5:18get an actual vote. That procedure is

5:20called cloture. And it is the reason

5:22that almost nothing passes the Senate.

5:24Republicans don't have 60, which means

5:26that this bill needs at least seven

5:28Democrats. And the seven who were always

5:30going to be those Democrats named

5:32themselves in a joint statement opposing

5:34the bill. Angela Also Brooks, Cory

5:36Booker, Catherine Cortez Masto, Ruben

5:38Gallego, John Hickenlooper, Mark Warner,

5:40and Raphael Warnock. Their statement

5:42said that the Republican text, as it

5:44currently stands, falls short. And that

5:46ethics, consumer protection, illicit

5:48finance, conflicts of interest, and

5:50market integrity all have to be

5:52strengthened. Three specific problems,

5:54and each one is very real. The ethics

5:56ban has a sunset date written into it.

5:58So, the provision has no effect after

6:01noon on January 20th, 2029. It expires

6:04the day that this administration ends.

6:06And Republicans are calling that a

6:07voluntary standard the president chose

6:09to hold himself to, but Democrats are

6:11reading it as a ban with a timer on it.

6:14Second is that enforcement runs through

6:16the Department of Justice. Senator also

6:18Brookes, who is one of only two

6:19Democrats who actually voted this bill

6:21out of committee, says that she'll

6:22oppose it unless state attorney generals

6:24get concurrent authority. Senator Lummis

6:26went on Fox and explained exactly why

6:28that is a non-starter for her side. Take

6:30a listen.

6:31>> You had several Democrats yet last night

6:33voicing concerns about about the updated

6:35tax, particularly around the bill's

6:37enforcement mechanism. That places

6:39responsibility on the attorney general.

6:42Is that the issue right now?

6:43>> That is kind of a bright line. You know,

6:46we had worked until there was an impasse

6:49with Democrats earlier this month

6:51because they want state attorneys

6:54general to be able to sue elected

6:57officials that are subject to this

6:59ethics law. And so, that would allow,

7:02for example,

7:04an an attorney general from another

7:06state to sue me if they thought I

7:09violated the ethics law. So, when I ran

7:12that by senators, uh they said, "We

7:15don't want that."

7:16Uh and so, this this ethics provision is

7:20not just applicable to the president and

7:24the vice president. It's applicable to

7:26every house member, every senator, and

7:28every federal judge. So, we're trying to

7:32not plan legislation around one person

7:36who holds one office for the next 2

7:39years, but rather over time that will

Why The Money Is Real

7:42serve the House, the Senate, the

7:44Judiciary, and the Executive Branch in a

7:47fair way. I think uh

7:51it's going to be a struggle.

7:52>> The third is illicit financing. There's

7:54a section of the bill called the

7:55Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act,

7:57Section 604. That protects developers

8:00and node operators from being treated as

8:02unlicensed money transmitters for

8:04writing code. Senate Judiciary

8:05leadership on both sides oppose it.

8:07Backed by the National Sheriffs'

8:09Association, it survived the text drop,

8:11but unfortunately it's back on the

8:12table. So, if you add it all up, this is

8:14why the Clarity Act hasn't passed yet.

8:16Ethics is publicly rejected by the exact

8:18seven votes needed, enforcement is an

8:20open demand that hasn't been granted,

8:22and illicit finance is being attacked

8:24from three directions at once. And every

8:26one of those has to be resolved before

8:28senators leave town in just 15 days.

8:31Now, I know what some of you are

8:32thinking. Joe, this is Washington. This

8:34is process. Why are you spending 5

8:35minutes of my life on Senate floor

8:37mechanics before you actually get into

8:38the point of this video? Well, because

8:40the money on the other side of this is

8:41not small, and because the read that

8:43almost everyone has on it is wrong. The

8:46crypto industry is projected to

8:47contribute more than $55 billion to the

8:50American economy this year and support

8:51over 266,000

8:53jobs. Coinbase's vice chair went on CNBC

8:56and called it the one yard line. Goldman

8:58Sachs, the $3.6 trillion asset manager,

9:01publicly came out in support. And Mike

9:04Novogratz, the CEO of Galaxy Digital,

9:05said that Trump signs with it. Anthony

9:07Scaramucci says that if it reaches the

9:09floor, it passes. And that's because

9:11young Democrats don't want to run

9:13against pro-crypto packs in November.

What Russia Actually Legalized

9:15And here is the number that should make

9:17every politician in that building pay

9:18attention. More Americans now own

9:21Bitcoin, 18.6% than own gold at 10.8%.

9:25That is not a niche constituency

9:27anymore. That is a massive voting block

9:29during a midterm election year. So, the

9:31pressure is real, the money is real, and

9:33the deadline is extremely real. But

9:35that's the American story, and the

9:37American story is only half of what

9:39actually happened this week. While the

9:41United States spent the week arguing

9:42about who gets to sue who, Russia

9:45already signed this into law. A

9:47comprehensive framework covering

9:48exchanges, depositories, custodians, the

9:50whole apparatus. And most of it takes

9:52effect on September 1st. And here's the

9:55part that matters for you, because on

9:57its face this law looks pretty

9:58restrictive. Retail investors are capped

10:01at roughly $38,000 a year per

10:03intermediary. You still can't buy

10:04groceries with Bitcoin in Russia. Banks

10:06are banned from advertising crypto

10:08payments. So, why does any of this

10:09matter? Because of the exception that is

10:12written into it. Digital currencies,

10:14Bitcoin specifically, are explicitly

10:16permitted for settlement under foreign

10:18trade contracts between Russian

10:19residents and non-residents. Listen to

10:22that again. Retail gets a leash, but

10:24cross-border trade gets unlocked and

10:26Bitcoin is the currency underlying it.

10:29This is not just Russia embracing

10:30Bitcoin. This is Russia building a legal

10:32sanctions evasion lane and putting it

10:35into law. The European Union's April

10:37sanctions package specifically targeted

10:39Bitcoin with the EU stating plainly that

10:42Russia is becoming increasingly reliant

10:44on cryptocurrencies for international

10:45transactions. Russia's answer, 3 months

10:48later, was to make it legal. And Russia

10:50isn't alone in this.

10:51>> I'm still optimistic that if it doesn't

10:53happen by the August recess, it'll

10:55happen this year. I do think um the

10:58regulators now, with the CFTC and the

11:00SEC, can probably rule write most of

11:04what we need. The problem with rule

11:06writing is it's much more reversible

11:09than um

11:10than what you see when it joins statute.

11:12I've been spending a lot of time in

11:13Asia. I've been in Korea and Hong Kong

11:16four times in the last 9 months. They,

11:18on the one hand, been waiting for the

11:20Clarity Act. I actually think if it's

11:22not passed, you're going to see Asian

11:25local governments pass equivalents to

11:27try to catch up and even get ahead of

11:29the US. So, I'm long-term very

11:32optimistic. I just think we need, no pun

11:34intended, a lot more clarity, not just

11:36about US regulation, about global rates,

11:40and about the geopolitics.

11:42>> That was BlackRock, the world's largest

11:44asset manager, saying the quiet part on

11:45camera. If America stalls, Asia passes

11:49its own version and moves ahead, like we

11:50just saw in Russia, and we're about to

11:52see in China. Sooner or later, every

The Chart That Settles It

11:55country writes Bitcoin legislation into

11:57law. They embrace the currency. And the

11:59country that writes it first sets the

12:01terms that everyone else has to live

12:02with. That is the starting gun. It's

12:04already been fired. Russia moved this

12:06week. Asia is at the blocks getting

12:08ready, and the most powerful legislature

12:10on Earth has just 15 days and cannot

12:13agree on who enforces an ethics rule

12:15that expires in 2029, anyway. So, real

12:17quick, before you go any further, I want

12:19to know where you guys land on this.

12:20Drop one word in the comments. If you

12:22think that the Clarity Act passes before

12:23the August recess, comment pass. But if

12:26you think that it dies on the calendar

12:27yet again, comment nope. One word, I

12:30read all of these, and I'm genuinely

12:32curious how this audience is

12:33handicapping it. Because the prediction

12:34markets and the people actually in

12:36Washington are miles apart right now.

12:38And while you're down there, if you're

12:40getting value out of this, hit

12:41subscribe, drop a like, and turn on

12:42notifications. It helps the channel a

12:44ton, and it's the only reason I get to

12:45keep making these. Okay, now, back to

12:47it. Now, for the part you actually came

12:49for. I'm not just going to tell you what

12:51this means for Bitcoin, I'm going to

12:52show you the receipts. Because there's a

12:55chart that settles this argument

12:56completely, and almost nobody puts it

12:58next to a regulatory story. Take a look

13:00at this chart right here. This is the

13:01five-year performance of Bitcoin against

13:03every other major digital asset. As you

13:06can see, Bitcoin is up 81% over five

13:08years, and literally everything else on

13:10that chart is down. Many of them down

13:1280, 90, and in some cases nearly 100%.

13:15Now, hold that chart in your head, and

13:17go back to the ethics fight that we just

13:19spent six minutes on. What is that fight

13:22actually about? Well, it's about the

13:23president earning $1.4 billion. dollars.

13:25where did that money come from? Roughly

13:27594 million from World Liberty

13:30Financial, 636 million from a meme coin

13:32booked as royalties on a licensing

13:34agreement, and 197 million from a stable

13:37coin holding company. 1.5 million

13:40wallets bought that meme coin. Two out

13:42of three are underwater. And if you

13:43combine the realized and the paper

13:45losses on it, that's 3.8 billion dollars

13:48after it fell roughly 97% from its high.

13:51And across every single wallet that ever

13:53touched it, winners and losers together,

13:55the entire group is net positive about

13:57236 million. Well, the president

14:00reported 636 million from it. The token

14:03generated nearly three times as much for

14:05one person as it did for every buyer on

14:07Earth combined. Now, here's the part

14:09that got almost no coverage, and it's

14:11the number that I promised you at the

14:12start of this video. That same

14:14disclosure showed that the president

14:15also holds more than 50 million dollars

14:18of Bitcoin in a cold wallet. So, think

Issuer Risk

14:20about those two things side by side. The

14:22tokens that he launched, printed out of

14:24nothing, made him a billion dollars and

14:26cost retail 3.8 billion, but the Bitcoin

14:28that he holds, he just holds in cold

14:30storage, same as you, because there's

14:32nothing to launch. There's no pre-mine,

14:34there's no insider allocation, no

14:35licensing deal. There is no version of

14:38Bitcoin where somebody prints more of it

14:39and sells it to you. There's a whole

14:41phrase for what this whole ethics fight

14:43is actually about and why we're falling

14:45behind the rest of the world when it

14:46comes to Bitcoin. And once you have it,

14:48you're going to see it everywhere. And

14:49that is issuer risk. Issuer risk is the

14:51danger that comes from the fact that

14:53somebody controls the supply of the

14:55thing you own. Somebody can make more.

14:57Somebody knows things that you don't.

14:59Somebody decides when to sell. Every

15:01single asset with an issuer carries it.

15:02Stocks have it. Bonds have it. Every

15:04fiat currency on Earth has it, and every

15:07crypto token launched by a president, a

15:09celebrity, a founder, all of them have

15:11it in the most concentrated form.

15:13Bitcoin is the one monetary asset with

15:16no issuer at all. And that is what this

15:18entire 15-day fight is about. And

15:20nobody's saying it plainly. Congress is

15:22trying to write the rules governing what

15:24happens when powerful people can create

15:26assets out of nothing and sell them to

15:28you. That is a real and serious problem

15:30and requires real and serious law.

15:33But Bitcoin solved it in 2009 by not

15:35having anyone who could do that in the

15:37first place. By the way, I run a

15:39community for serious Bitcoin investors

15:40called the Hard Money Room. Weekly live

15:42discussions with me plus a live

15:44dashboard I built that scores exactly

15:46where we are in the cycle. Link for that

15:47is at the top of the description. And

15:49now for a quick word from this show's

15:50sponsor, skip ahead to this timestamp if

15:52you'd like. You know how I feel. I don't

Sponsors

15:54think that you should be selling your

15:56Bitcoin, but sometimes you need cash.

15:58You got a bill, a tax hit, an

15:59opportunity, and that's why I teamed up

16:01with Salt. Instead of selling, you

16:03borrow against your Bitcoin. No credit

16:05checks and you keep it every sat. These

16:07guys are the original Bitcoin back

16:09lenders since 2016. Battle-tested

16:11through every cycle and still standing

16:13while a lot of crypto lenders blew up. I

16:15worked out an exclusive deal just for

16:17you. A rate discount on a new loan plus

16:19a free Bitcoin borrowing playbook at

16:21saltlending.com/show. That's Never sell,

16:24borrow against it. And if you want to

16:26retire soon, but you're unsure how to

16:27manage volatility, avoid selling

16:31Bitcoin, and draw income from your

16:33portfolio, you don't have to wing your

16:35retirement or settle for some trad-fi

16:37guy that just doesn't get it. Because

16:38Stronghold was built for retiring

16:40Bitcoiners like you. Picture heading

16:42into retirement with an advisor who

16:44shares your worldview, a plan designed

16:46around your Bitcoin, and a portfolio

16:48strategy that adapts to the current

16:49market regime. So, no matter what

16:51Bitcoin does next, your retirement is

16:54built for it. Book a free discovery call

16:55at stronghold.net/show. Go to

16:57stronghold.net/show.

16:59Special thanks to Salt and Stronghold

17:01for sponsoring the video. And now, back

What It Means For Your Bitcoin

17:03to the show. So, what does this actually

17:04mean for the Bitcoin in your portfolio

17:07over the next 2 weeks and the rest of

17:08the year? Let me be honest with you in a

17:10way that most people covering this won't

17:12be. If clarity passes before August 7th,

17:14it's genuinely a good thing. Banks get a

17:16clearer path to custody Bitcoin, execute

17:19trades, and integrate it into lending

17:20and prime brokerage. Institutions that

17:22dipped a toe get regulatory scaffolding

17:25to commit fully to the asset. And most

17:27importantly, it replaces rules that flip

17:30with every administration with actual

17:32law, which is much harder to reverse.

17:35But if it fails, comprehensive federal

17:36Bitcoin regulation slides to September

17:39and realistically to 2027 given the

17:41midterms. The SEC and CFTC keep making

17:44policy through rule making instead of

17:46actual law, which makes it reversible

17:48and temporary and prevents a lot of

17:50people from buying Bitcoin and building

17:52infrastructure around it. Here is the

17:54admission that I will make and it's very

17:56real. That difference matters enormously

17:58for exchanges, for stablecoin issuers,

18:00for tokenization platforms, for the

18:02entire regulated crypto complex. If you

18:05hold CoinDesk or Circle stock, the next

18:0715 days are one of the biggest binary

18:09events over your year. But for Bitcoin,

18:12you got to understand what's actually on

18:13the table. Bitcoin is already treated as

18:15a commodity by the United States

18:16government. It already has regulated

18:18futures. It already has spot ETFs. The

18:21CFTC has already been building the

18:23plumbing anyway, legalizing perpetual

18:25futures and clearing the way for Bitcoin

18:27to be posted as margin collateral. None

18:29of which required a single vote in the

18:31Senate. So, the Clarity Act doesn't

18:33decide whether Bitcoin is legal. It just

18:35decides how comfortable a bank feels

18:37holding it. So, three forces are

18:39converging here and none of them are on

18:40the Senate calendar.

18:42Number one is sovereign competition.

18:43Russia legislated Bitcoin this week.

18:45Asia moves next and every jurisdiction

18:47that writes these rules pulls Bitcoin

18:49further from any single government's

18:51control, which is the entire point of

18:53the asset. Number two is the ownership

18:55base. 18.6% of Americans hold Bitcoin,

18:58more than gold. That happened without

19:00federal market structure legislation.

19:02Every year that number grows regardless

19:04of what Washington D.C. does. So, the

19:06political cost of moving against that

19:09rises, making legislation inevitable. If

19:11it doesn't happen this year, it's going

19:12to happen at some point. And number

19:14three, the issuance problem is permanent

19:16and the solution is already deployed.

19:19Every ethics fight, every insider

19:21trading bill, which they also just

19:22passed by the way, every conflict of

19:24interest hearing is the government

19:25slowly discovering that assets with

19:27issuers inherently create corruption.

Nothing Is Coming To Save It

19:30Bitcoin's answer to that has been

19:31running every 10 minutes since January

19:332009 and newsflash, it doesn't require

19:35anyone's permission or anyone's vote.

19:38Nobody is coming to save Bitcoin. Not

19:40this bill, not a strategic reserve, not

19:42an ETF approval, not a rate cut, not a

19:44president. The asset has to survive on

19:46its own merits, get bought for what it

19:48actually is, and climb from there.

19:50That's exactly how it's always worked.

19:52That's how it worked in 2015, in 2019,

19:54in 2023, and every single time the

19:57people waiting for permission missed the

19:59move entirely. And I'd argue it's

20:01actually the most bullish structural

20:03fact about Bitcoin. Every other asset in

20:06this space needs Washington. It needs

20:08lawmakers to come in and support it.

20:11Bitcoin is the only one that doesn't.

20:12I'll show that chart up on screen again.

20:14The proof is in the performance. The

20:16market has spent two years waiting for

20:18permission, but permission was never the

20:20constraint. And the moment that enough

20:22buyers figure that out is the moment

20:24that Bitcoin finally moves. And nothing

20:26on the Senate calendar is going to tell

20:28you when that happens. Lawmakers and

20:30regulators have always been playing

20:31catch up to Bitcoin, but Bitcoin

20:33continues producing a block every 10

20:35minutes. Nothing can stop it. Senator

20:37Lummis was right. This is not the finish

20:39line. It is the starting gun. But here's

Close

20:42what she missed and here's what I need

20:43you to take away from this video.

20:45Bitcoin didn't wait for the gun. It's

20:48been running since 2009 through four

20:50administrations, from $0 all the way to

20:52$1.5 trillion in value, through two SEC

20:55chairs who tried to kill it, and a

20:56decade of regulation by enforcement.

20:59Russia can legislate, Asia can

21:00legislate, the Senate can fail to

21:02legislate for the fourth year running,

21:03but Bitcoin still works. That's the

21:06entire point. The race that everyone is

21:08watching in Washington is a race to

21:10catch up to something that is already

21:12won. If you want the deeper macro

21:14picture underneath all of this, go and

21:15watch my last video on the business

21:17cycle turning and what that actually

21:18means for where Bitcoin bottoms. You

21:20could watch that one next and I'll see

21:21you over there. Channel members also got

21:23this video early, so hit the join button

21:25down below to support the channel and

21:26become a member. And if you haven't

21:27already, subscribe to the channel and

21:29hit the bell to get notified whenever a

21:30new video goes live and join the hard

21:32money room at the link in the video

21:33description. I'll see you in the next

21:35one.

More from Joe Consorti

Recently added transcripts

Browse the whole transcript library

This transcript was generated from the captions YouTube publishes for this video. Get the transcript of any YouTube video atfreeyoutubetranscribe.com, free, unlimited, no sign-up.