Full transcript
Hint İrfanı
0:02***translated by Prof.Dr. Nükhet Kardam*** Çilingir Sofrası 14 / Indian Wisdom, Vedanta
0:04Let’s see how we might be inspired by ancient Indian wisdom.
0:10I hope it won’t be boring.
0:12Sinan: Of course not.
0:15I did some research, distilling some of these teachings.
0:20We already know that there are many
0:23different kinds of Thought around the world.
0:26There is no culture that doesn’t have its own Thought.
0:28Thinking is the basis of culture.
0:33There are also many different philosophical perspectives
0:37Some complement each other, others are opposites.
0:41One of the most ancient Wisdoms come from India
0:50And has influenced others that came after it.
1:01It has its own myths. It is a major culture.
1:06It has a basic teaching,
Veda Öğretisi, Vedanta
1:18It is known as Veda.
1:23Or Vedas in plural
1:29The basic concept of this teaching is ‘Vedanta’.
1:37This is the basic concept and I will explain why.
1:43This philosophy might seem rational,
1:47but its main focus is mystical.
1:50It is mystical because it is based on mystical experiences.
1:54Philosophy is generally understood through concepts, through thinking,
2:00what we call logos.
2:03Anyone can explore these concepts and can learn from them.
2:11But there is also mystical thought.
2:13How can something be both mystical and experienced as thought?
2:18Mystical means something that cannot be expressed by words
2:21The word comes from “Mysterion’
2:26There is the ‘Three monkeys’
2:30I didn’t see,
2:31I didn’t hear,
2:32I didn’t speak.
2:35Mysterion is symbolized by these Three Monkeys.
2:41There is an experience where I don’t see, I don’t hear, or I cannot speak of it
2:47But it exists. We live it in the darkness of the night.
2:56That’s what we call mystical experience.
3:02Our existence is based on our senses,
3:06we speak
3:08then we create knowledge.
3:13Of course, the five senses contribute to creating knowledge.
3:18But can we abnegate sensate experience and go beyond it?
3:23Yes, and that is what we call mystical experience.
3:28The function of Vedanta emerges from mystical experience.
3:34In the West, they call this ‘Meditation’.
3:37We use this word (Meditasyon) in Turkish as well.
3:42It is used in French and English and is equivalent to ‘Tefekkür’ meaning thought processes.
3:50But in the Vedanta teaching,
3:55Mystical experience does not use thought processes or cannot be expressed in speech.
3:59It is the kind of experience that cannot be explained in words.
4:03So ‘tefekkür’ would not be the right word to define mystical experience.
4:08Buddha has called it Nirvana
4:11Or it has been called ‘Moksha’ meaning freedom,
4:16or ‘Diana’ translated as meditation,
4:19but it doesn’t correspond to the mystical experience we are talking about.
4:21This experience is not sensate.
4:25There are no images.
4:29It seems like such an experience would be impossible.
4:33It goes beyond thought, beyond the mind,
4:37Mind needs speech. If we can’t speak, how can we express thoughts?
4:42So how is this possible?
4:48Is there any awareness in mystical experience?
4:50Or what do we mean by awareness?
4:51It may be too early to discuss these questions
4:54Since we just started exploring this ancient Wisdom.
4:59Let’s first look at what they mean by mystical experience.
5:02We said there is no perception in mystical experience.
5:07That means there is an experience but there is no awareness. But is that true?
5:12There must be more to it.
Mistik Felsefe, Mistik Deneyimin Ussal Yorumu
5:15We can use the term “mystical philosophy” here.
5:19Mystical philosophy means that we carry
5:25the mystical experience to our consciousness and interpret it.
5:31Interpretation of the mystical experience in the mind
5:35This is very interesting.
5:41Even though we said mystical experience excludes sensate experience,
5:48there is darkness, blindness,
5:53like a black hole,
5:55it is still valuable to find ways of comparison.
5:58For example, we have dreams, and in our dreams we have sensate experiences
6:04We perceive things in dreams. So it seems there is no comparison to mystical experiences.
6:13We have a will in our dreams, we see different desires in dreams,
6:20but what we don’t have is an awareness or a consciousness.
6:24We can’t say, let me stop this dream and restart it somewhere else.
6:29I heard that some people are capable of doing this, but I am talking about general experiences.
6:32Sinan: So you don’t have any control over your dreams
6:34When we are dreaming we see what is projected on the screen.
6:39It is like being in a movie theater.
6:44Then we wake up
6:46And leave the movie theater and ask each other how the movie was.
6:50This time, we are not interpreting the movie simultaneously as we are watching it
6:56Instead, we are now outside the theater, and someone asks us what we thought of the film.
7:02Now we are talking about reinterpreting the film, thinking about the images we saw
7:10Almost like creating our own film, we start to tell a story,
7:15This happened, that happened etc.
7:18In a logical fashion.
7:21Just like dreams may be translated into stories that we tell
7:34In the same way we can talk about our mystical experiences afterwards.
7:39Where is the problem?
7:41In dreams, there are visions, there are sensate experiences,
7:43so that when I talk about them,
7:46I can compare it to something that exists.
8:04Such as I can tell you that I saw a flower
8:07The flower was yellow.
8:08And you would know because you have probably seen a yellow flower.
8:10I can tell you I saw water, and you know water.
8:13But in a mystical experience, there is darkness.
8:16No images.
8:21How can I talk about that?
8:23I can’t talk about it.
8:27Then you would say:
8:28how do you know that you lived this experience?
8:32There are certain symptoms of experiences
8:38But they are just symptoms.
8:40If you ask, how did they come into being? I would say I don’t know.
8:44Something appeared but you don’t know about it.
8:48So clearly, mystical experiences cannot be put into a rational structure.
8:54It can’t be transferred into literature or books.
8:58That’s why those who live mystical experiences say that
9:01those experiences are wordless.
9:04How can we call it knowledge if it can’t be expressed in words?
9:10We only know one kind of knowledge and that is rational knowledge,
9:14the kind that can be tried by others, that can be repeated,
9:22but mystical experience is not like that.
9:24So what is its purpose?
9:26What is this?
9:28Those who have mystical experiences say that
9:32this is a kind ‘soyutlanma’ (isolation)
9:35Not ‘soyutlama’ (abstraction)
9:36‘Soyutlama’ is an abstract thought process such as in mathematics.
9:41Not related to senses.
9:47This is not it.
9:49'Soyutlanma’ is different.
9:51That is an experience that is isolated from all senses.
9:54A purifying experience.
9:58Why would you be interested in such an experience?
10:03Because such an experience breaks the force or influence of sensate experiences.
10:09We are breaking down illusions.
10:15We are not talking about illusionists or magicians.
10:21Here illusions are about being fooled.
Duyularımız Bizi Aldatıyor.
10:25Illusions are about being deluded. Our senses delude us.
10:31Like a mirage
10:33Like a mirage
10:36For example, let’s check out how films are made.
10:41Films are simulations of reality.
10:44Whatever we see is a simulation. If for instance someone is riding a horse,
10:50That means someone riding a horse was filmed at some point and now we are showing it on screen.
10:53But the reality of actually riding a horse is not there.
10:57The simulation is the same as the reality.
11:03The behavior, the colors, the images,
11:06How the horse is trotting
11:08Serhan: It was real when it was filmed.
11:10That’s what I mean. We filmed a reality
11:13And now we are reflecting it on screen.
11:15Are we reflecting that reality one to one? Yes.
11:20But it is not real, it is only real in the sense of cinematography. It is a different kind of reality.
11:29Tarkovski calls this “Sculpting in Time”
11:33We take time with cameras and transfer it into the movie.
11:41Movies have their own internal time.
11:44In fact, we cut scenes, edit out some scenes, add others.
11:50So we create a new version of time
11:53We think what we are watching is real,
11:59but turn off the TV or click the off button and it is gone.
12:02It disappears, It is not there anymore.
12:08Turn it on again, and you see all these activities,
12:11You see someone riding a horse, drinking water etc.
12:18It reflects reality
12:22And yet it is not real.
12:26I remember something right now.
Cenab-I Nebii Mekke’de Baskı Görüyor, Medine’ye Göçüyor.
12:33So Prophet Muhammed was being oppressed by deniers in Mecca.
12:43As you know, the deniers wanted to kill him
12:44Each tribe choose a gunman
12:48and said if we do it all together, no one can be blamed.
12:52We need to kill the person who is threatening
12:54Our existence, our freedom, our riches, our livelihood.
12:59He wants to take all of this away.
13:02At that time there were very few believers.
13:06Prophet Muhammed and his followers hear about this plan and decide to leave Mecca.
13:11They decide to move, to leave Mecca.
13:17And go to Yesrib, which is close and safer.
13:22They think that there are Jews, Christians and others in Yesrib who may protect them.
13:33So they move from Mecca
13:34to the town of Yesrib.
13:38In Arabic, Yesrib comes from the word ‘Serap’ (Mirage)
13:45A place where one sees a Mirage.
13:50‘Serap’ is not an illusion.
13:52What is the difference between an illusion and a mirage?
13:57You can imagine something that is not there.
14:05But ‘Serap’ or Mirage like a simulation,
14:08Taking a reality that exists in one place and
14:12Reflects it by the light in the atmosphere to somewhere else.
14:14Like a hologram.
14:18And you see an Oasis, you see water.
14:21And when you get there,
14:24You find out that there is nothing there.
14:26Interesting. Is this in my imagination? Did I dream about it?
14:31No, it is a physical event.
14:37So what we call simulation is exactly like ‘Serap’.
14:44In that region, in Saudi Arabia
14:46seeing an oasis was common,
14:50that means the atmosphere was conducive to it.
14:54They go to Yesrib, and settle there, and the deniers send their armies after them.
14:59These are well-known events,
15:02but what interests us is the aspect of ‘Mirage’.
15:05Prophet Muhammed is received well at Yesrib, and his wisdom and understanding is much appreciated.
15:12Yesrib has a king, but at that time king didn’t mean king of a whole country but more like a mayor of a small town.
15:26The king tells Prophet Muhammed that he would like to transfer his position to him
15:31because he is such a dependable, honest, knowledgeable person.
15:38He thanks him for coming to their town.
15:41And says that he would like to give up his position as king and transfer it to the Prophet.
15:49He knows that he is not as knowledgeable as the Prophet, but clearly he had discernment.
15:57But the Prophet says no.
16:01He says, you should continue being King.
16:05But I can be in charge of Justice. Like a Minister of Justice.
16:15The king accepts.
16:18***translated by Prof.Dr. Nükhet Kardam*** Çilingir Sofrası 14 / Indian Wisdom, Vedanta