Full transcript
| Introduzione
0:13Welcome back to my channel , friends , or
0:15if you're new , welcome . I'm Elisa , and
0:17like every Monday , I'm here with you
0:19today to tell you a True Crime story . I
0:22also remind you that the purpose of my
0:24videos and my channel is always to
0:26speak out , raise awareness , but above
0:28all , to remember the victims of these
0:29stories . Before starting with today's
0:33case , however , friends , give me just a
0:35minute to tell you about the sponsor of
0:37this video , WeRoad . I don't know about
0:40you , but this happens to me very often .
0:42I get the urge to leave . I start
0:44looking at a thousand destinations ,
0:46flights , beautiful places , and in my
0:47head , I'm already there . By now you
0:49know me ; you know how much I love to
0:51travel . But then I have to come back
0:54down to earth and face the less fun
0:55part : organizing travel , finding places
0:57to sleep , getting everyone I'm
0:59traveling with to agree . Let's say the
1:02idea of being able to skip all that
1:04doesn't bother me at all , and in fact ,
1:06it's one of the things I love most
1:08about WeRoad . You choose the trip and
1:11they take care of all the organization .
1:15You can choose from over 1,000
1:17itineraries all over the world , and the
1:19best thing is that WeRoad is a real
1:20community . You travel in small groups
1:24of people roughly the same age and with
1:26a travel mood similar to yours . Maybe
1:28you leave not knowing anyone and come
1:30back with a group of people with whom
1:31you've shared an incredible experience .
1:34So , if you too have that folder in your
1:36head full of " places I'd like to go
1:38sooner or later , " I highly recommend
1:40taking a look at their site . You can
1:44find all the available itineraries , and
1:46if it's your first trip with them , use
1:49the discount code in the description
1:51for 150 off your booking . Thanks to
1:54WeRoad for sponsoring this video , but
1:56above all , friends , thank you for your
1:58support of the channel . And now , let's
2:00begin with today's case . Yes . In the
| La situazione a New York
2:30city of New York . At a certain point ,
2:32flyers start appearing . They are
2:35attached to walls , light poles , and
2:37outside offices . On these papers , there
2:41is a huge word written in red : " WANTED .
2:45" And underneath are photos and names
2:49of healthcare executives : Thomas
2:52Halloran , Eder Cianfrocco , Andrew Witty
2:55, and then a sentence : " No healthcare
2:58CEO is safe . " There is also one with
3:02the face of Brian Thompson , but over
3:05his face is a big red X. After his
3:07murder , therefore , someone starts
3:10pointing fingers at other faces , as if
3:12to say , " You could be next . " In a short
3:17time , panic spreads within the
3:18companies , and security measures are
3:20increased . Some CEOs are taking their
3:23photos down from official websites ,
3:25while others are even hiring personal
3:28bodyguards . But at the same time ,
3:30something singular is happening .
3:33According to lawyer Joseph Seideman ,
3:35after the murder of Brian Thompson ,
3:37there is an atmosphere of fear inside
3:39UnitedHealthcare , and not only there .
3:42Some employees , he declares , are even
3:45afraid to sign the letters denying
3:48insurance coverage . No one wants to
3:52take responsibility for saying no
3:53anymore . And so , a specific question
3:56has started circulating on the web . If
4:00for a period no one wants to put their
4:03name under a denial , if this has made
4:06it harder to deny care , is it possible
4:09that Luigi Mangione saved more lives
4:12than he took ? So , this episode is part
| I tre procedimenti giudiziari
4:18two of the series on the Luigi Mangione
4:21case . If you haven't seen the first
4:24part , I suggest you do because
4:26otherwise you'll have a hard time
4:28understanding , as I won't be doing a
4:30summary and we will pick up exactly
4:32where we left off , namely that Luigi
4:35Mangione has been arrested and the
4:37charges against him are brought by
4:39three different entities , let's say .
4:43The state of Pennsylvania for firearm
4:46possession and the issue of the fake
4:48document , because he was there when he
4:51showed the fake ID to the police ; New
4:54York State regarding the murder charges
4:57; and the U.S. federal government
4:59regarding practically the same things ,
5:02charges of murder and stalking
5:04resulting in death . This means that
5:08three different trials will take place
5:10against him . This is causing a lot of
5:14debate because it is not something very
5:17common , or rather , it is true that
5:19every state has its own laws and he
5:22committed some crimes in the state of
5:24New York and others in Pennsylvania ;
5:27the fact that he crossed state lines
5:29while committing a crime , or with the
5:32intent to commit a crime , plus the
5:34terrorism charges , categorize it as a
5:36federal case . But a trial is a
5:40significant drain on resources , time ,
5:43but above all , money . Many think that
5:46it is not necessary to have three
5:49separate trials for what is essentially
5:51a single matter , especially when the
5:53New York State charges and the federal
5:56ones are so incredibly similar , as they
5:58concern the same crime . According to
6:02some , in fact , it is as if they are
6:05fighting over Luigi Mangione , as if
6:07everyone wants a piece of him , as if
6:09they have to prove something to someone
6:12. On December 19 , 2024 , Luigi is
| Tutti vogliono Luigi
6:26extradited from Pennsylvania to New
6:28York and his arrival in Manhattan is
6:31nothing short of cinematic . A " perp
6:35walk " is actually organized for him .
6:39Let me explain what that is because I
6:41only discovered its existence with this
6:43case . I had never seen one before . "
6:47Perp walk " is short for perpetrator
6:49walk , a parade for the accused , even
6:52though at this point in the story , no
6:55one has been found guilty yet .
7:00Basically , it’s a show , a show for
7:02the media and the public , where the
7:05detainee is marched out in handcuffs ,
7:08usually surrounded by armed guards , to
7:11show everyone they’ve been arrested
7:14and that justice is working . It’s a
7:18way to send a message , and yes , it is
7:20exactly as trashy as it sounds . Luigi
7:23Mangione , in fact , gets off the
7:26helicopter dressed in an orange prison
7:28jumpsuit , handcuffed and surrounded by
7:31a phalanx of armed officers . Even the
7:36mayor of New York at the time , Eric
7:38Adams , attended this parade , which is
7:40strange , because usually , mayors don't
7:43attend these things or supervise the
7:45transfer of prisoners , but Adams wanted
7:48to make an exception for Mangione , and
7:51there’s a reason for that . He says it
7:54himself in an interview with WPIX News .
8:00He says , " I wanted to look him in the
8:01eye and say , ' You committed this
8:03terrorist act in my city , the city New
8:05Yorkers love , ' and I wanted to be there
8:08to show the symbolic meaning of this
8:10gesture . " Afterward , Mayor Adams even
8:32posted images of the perp walk on his
8:35social media , writing that those who
8:38bring illegal weapons into our city
8:40will face justice . But as noted in a
8:44New York Times article , this initiative
8:47drew a lot of criticism , especially
8:49considering the fact that he himself
8:52was under federal indictment at the
8:54time and even had to appear before the
8:57same judge that Mangione later appeared
9:00before , Judge Katherine Parker , to
9:02defend himself against corruption and
9:05fraud charges . But setting that aside ,
9:10I tried looking for other photos of
9:13other perp walks , and I couldn't find a
9:16single one of this magnitude — I mean ,
9:19with all these armed guards around the
9:22perp . There’s a Reddit thread that
9:28points out how Luigi had many more
9:31armed guards around him than Timothy
9:34McVeigh , who , with his 1995 Oklahoma
9:38City bombing , took the lives of 168
9:41people , including 19 children .
9:57Regardless of everything , the perp walk
9:59is just something that , in my opinion ,
10:01is wrong for so many reasons . First of
10:03all , it’s something born in a
10:06different era , a time when the idea was
10:08to exhibit the criminal , humiliate them
10:11publicly , and show that the state was
10:14stronger . Today , however , something
10:17like this is extremely risky and
10:20prejudicial , especially because we live
10:22in a world where an image is worth more
10:25than any verdict , where a photograph
10:28circles the globe in minutes , where
10:30public perception can decide a person's
10:33fate before the trial even begins . The
10:37presumption of innocence is a legal
10:39principle . Everyone is innocent until
10:42proven guilty . But if you parade an
10:45alleged innocent person in handcuffs ,
10:47dressed as a prisoner with 800 machine
10:49guns around him , you are sending a
10:51visual message that says exactly the
10:52opposite . But all of this only
10:56strengthens the support that has now
10:59been created around Luigi Mangione .
11:13Guys , this is the craziest thing I've
11:15ever seen in my life . I know . Oh my god
11:21. These windows are so dirty . See him
11:26in the orange jumpsuit ? He's in the
11:27orange jumpsuit . Oh my god . You're
11:29doing great , baby . Oh , we love you . If
11:34I knew I would have mad I know .
11:37Seriously . Oh my god . Supporters , in
11:55fact , are growing in number and they
11:57are not just girls , as some tend to
11:59simplify , and they don't support him
12:01for aesthetic reasons . The truth , as we
12:05explained at length in the first part ,
12:08is that healthcare in the United States
12:10is a deeply felt , complex issue , loaded
12:13with frustration and anger accumulated
12:15over the years . In this context , the
12:26support arising around Mangione is not
12:29necessarily about the act he is accused
12:32of ; it is about the idea of a system
12:34perceived as unfair , about the desire
12:37for change and , obviously , the media
12:40perp walk . The mayor right there in the
12:45middle and the three different
12:47proceedings don't help , that is , they
12:49lead people to think that when the
12:52victim is a powerful billionaire ... the
12:54State's response is of a certain type ,
12:57more immediate , more visible , stronger ,
12:59and this is not fair because in the
13:02United States murders happen every day ,
13:05brutal murders , women killed by
13:07partners , people who disappear in total
13:09silence , and you rarely see a spectacle
13:13of this kind . Rarely is there a mayor
13:16walking behind the defendant . Rarely is
13:18such a powerful , symbolic image created
13:22. And it is precisely in those
13:25differences that support is born , and
13:27as I was saying , it is not necessarily
13:29support for the act , it is support for
13:31what that story represents for those
13:34who have felt ignored , crushed , for the
13:37invisibles for years . issue there are
13:57377 homicide cases that happened in New
13:59York City in 2024 and this is the only
14:02one involving the death penalty , you
14:04wait until Luigi does that in order to
14:07talk about how many people are in need
14:09and dying because of health , you wait
14:12for him . The media , let's go , tell the
14:16truth . Stop gaslighting people . We
14:19don't know what the evidence says . We
14:21don't know if he did this . Sometimes
14:23when people come out to support this ,
14:25they try to turn this misogynistically
14:27into some sort of fandom . Um , what we
14:30have here are two distinct battles , and
14:31the prosecution is trying to confuse
14:33them . The first one is the right to a
14:36fair trial , right , inalienable human
14:38rights . The second part that we're
14:39dealing with is health , and that is the
14:41right to life that we have here in
14:42America . Living in a country without
14:44public healthcare , yeah , how is it ?
14:48It's , it's horrible . I mean , like my
14:50dad still pays for my insurance .
14:53Finding care , medical care , is like
14:55impossible if you don't have good
14:57insurance . Yeah . Normal people . Other
15:15countries , United Nations . We have , we
15:21are the only highly developed nation
15:24without public health . Hear me ,
15:28Americans , what human rights are we
15:30really fighting for , and what kind of
15:32country do we want to continue to see ?
15:37Just . Accepting a government just
15:41waiting for all of us to die is not
15:43correct . Then , when the photos of
16:01Mangione's arrest are released , the
16:03situation does not improve . In the
16:07photo , in fact , you can see a large
16:09stain on his jeans as if he had
16:11urinated on himself . Supporters react
16:14immediately . According to many of them ,
16:17it is yet another demonstration of
16:19inhumane treatment towards him . As we
16:21know , Luigi suffered from spondylitis ,
16:24a back condition that can also cause
16:27incontinence problems . The comments
16:31multiply . There are those who talk
16:33about abuses of power , those who claim
16:36that in certain cases the police use
16:38humiliation as a tool of pressure
16:40during interrogations , leading people
16:42to beg to be allowed to go to the
16:44bathroom and then denying it to them .
16:47In a few hours , that image becomes yet
16:49another element around which the debate
16:51polarizes . In any case , the lawyers who
16:54will follow Luigi's trials in New York
16:56are appointed , and they are Mark and
16:58Karen Agnifilo and Jacob Kaplan . And if
17:02you think you've already heard the name
17:04Agnifilo , which I would pronounce
17:07Agnifilo , but they pronounce it
17:08Agnifilo , so I'll say it the way they
17:11say it , it's probably because you
17:13followed the P. Diddy case , because
17:15Mark Agnifilo specifically was his
17:17lawyer . An official website is also
17:21created , managed by the defense team ,
17:23where you can find updates on hearings ,
17:26documents filed in court , official
17:28press releases , and clarifications
17:30regarding the information circulating
17:33online — a sort of narrative control
17:35center — and on this site , we also find
17:38a " contribute " section . In fact , a
17:42legal fund is created where people can
17:45donate money so that Luigi can pay for
17:48his lawyers and cover the defense costs
17:51for the three ongoing proceedings . And
17:55you might say , " But why set up a fund ?
17:57Wasn't his family super wealthy ? " Well ,
| Il rapporto con la famiglia
18:02the situation regarding his family is
18:03not clear . Nothing is known , in the
18:06sense that his parents have never
18:08attended his hearings , and it is
18:10unclear if they are in contact , if they
18:13go to visit him , and consequently , if
18:15they are paying for his lawyers . The
18:19only public statement his parents
18:21released after his arrest was through
18:23their lawyer , and they stated these
18:25words . Our family is shocked and
18:28devastated by Luigi's arrest . We offer
18:31our prayers to Brian Thompson's family
18:33and ask everyone to pray for all those
18:35involved . But it doesn't matter if the
| Il supporto popolare
18:38family is paying for his lawyers or not
18:40, because do you know how much money
18:42supporters have donated to Luigi
18:44Mangione's Legal Fund ? I'll look it up
18:48live with you today , and by today , I
18:51mean the moment I am recording this
18:54part , so August 20th , if I'm not
18:57mistaken . As of today , the figure they
19:03have reached is 1,567,403 . Needless to
19:11say , in addition to receiving a lot of
19:14money , Luigi also receives many , many
19:16letters from his supporters . He
19:19receives hundreds every single day , and
19:22to ensure people know he has received
19:25them all , he keeps a kind of catalog , a
19:28binder where he basically logs every
19:31letter he receives ; that is , he writes
19:34down the zip code and the initials of
19:37the sender for each one , and he updates
19:40this catalog every so often , which can
19:42always be found in a dedicated section
19:45on his site . As of today , there are
19:50about 80 , perhaps more than 80 pages of
19:53this catalog , and each of these pages
19:55contains at least a hundred logged
19:57letters , so you do the math . Anyway ,
| Metropolitan Detention Center
20:09let's get back to our story . Luigi
20:11Mangione is in prison ; he is held at
20:14the MDC , the Metropolitan Detention
20:16Center , the prison that , by the way ,
20:19holds all the most famous criminals in
20:21the world , practically , because P.
20:23Diddy , Maduro , the former president of
20:26Venezuela , Ghislaine Maxwell are
20:28detained there , and as I told you ,
20:30Luigi has some of the best lawyers one
20:33could have . He has pleaded not guilty .
20:38So now we just have to enter the cycle
20:40of the various hearings where things
20:41will come out that were not known
20:43before . So , let's talk about the
| L’iter delle udienze
20:47federal trial , which is , let's say , the
20:49most important one , if only because
20:51it's the trial where Luigi risks the
20:53death penalty if he were to be
20:54convicted . The death penalty , in fact ,
20:58is not provided for in the New York
21:01trial nor in the Pennsylvania one ,
21:03because in both states the death
21:05penalty is not legal . At the federal
21:09level , however , the death penalty is
21:12still provided for , and that is why
21:14this proceeding is considered the most
21:17delicate and important ; in particular ,
21:20in this case against Luigi Mangione ,
21:23the death penalty was requested by the
21:25U.S. Attorney General , Pamela Bondi ,
21:28who incidentally , to date , has been
21:31fired by Trump and is no longer
21:34Attorney General due to alleged
21:36mismanagement regarding the files . The
21:40official document requesting the death
21:43penalty states that according to the
21:45United States government , the
21:47circumstances of the crime alleged in
21:49count 3 , namely murder by use of a
21:51firearm , are such that in the event of
21:53a conviction , a death sentence would be
21:56justified . And the aggravating factors
22:00of the count are also specified , which
22:02are those that would justify the death
22:05sentence . I will list them for you ,
22:07there are five . The first is grave risk
22:09of death to other persons . Mangione , in
22:12committing the crime , allegedly
22:13knowingly created a grave risk of death
22:16for one or more persons other than the
22:18victim of the crime . This means that ,
22:21having killed Brian Thompson in the
22:23middle of the street , he could have
22:24wounded other people . Two , substantial
22:27planning and premeditation . Mangione
22:30allegedly committed the crime after
22:32substantial planning and premeditation
22:34to cause the death of a person . Three .
22:37Impact on the victim . Mangione
22:39allegedly caused injury , harm , and loss
22:41to the family , friends , and colleagues
22:43of Brian Thompson . Four . Selection of
22:46the location and the victim for an act
22:48of violence . Mangione allegedly
22:51intentionally killed Brian Thompson ,
22:54CEO of a health insurance company ,
22:56while the victim was heading to an
22:59investor conference to amplify an
23:01ideological message , to maximize the
23:04visibility and impact of the victim's
23:07murder , and to provoke broad resistance
23:09to the health industry . The fifth is
23:13future danger . Mangione allegedly poses
23:17a future danger because he expressed an
23:20intention to target an entire industry
23:23and to rally political and social
23:25opposition to that industry , engaging
23:28in an act of lethal violence , taking
23:30steps to evade law enforcement , fleeing
23:33New York City immediately after the
23:35murder , and crossing state lines armed
23:38with a firearm and a privately made
23:41silencer . Now , obviously , the first
23:45thing Mangione's defense does is
23:48attempt to prevent the government from
23:51seeking the death penalty , and it does
23:54so with a very long motion filed on
23:57April 11 , 2025 , in which it first
23:59points the finger directly at U.S.
24:02Attorney General Pamela Bondi , arguing
24:05that the way the government acted , but
24:08especially communicated , compromised
24:12his right — Luigi's right — to a fair
24:15trial . The central point is this .
24:18According to the defense , Bondi turned
24:21a judicial decision into a political
24:24statement . On April 1 , 2025 , in fact ,
24:44Bondi held a press conference where she
24:47announced , in no uncertain terms , that
24:50she had ordered federal prosecutors to
24:53seek the death penalty against Mangione
24:56, stating she was doing so : " As we
24:58carry out President Trump's agenda to
25:01stop violent crime and make America
25:03safe again . " Make America safe again .
25:09The problem for the defense is that in
25:11all of her speech , a fundamental thing
25:14was never mentioned : the presumption of
25:16innocence . Mangione , at this point in
25:20the story , has not yet been convicted
25:22of anything ; he is a defendant .
25:25Technically and legally , he is innocent
25:27until proven guilty , but this is not
25:29even hinted at , and the press
25:30conference was not an isolated incident
25:33. Just shortly after , on April 6 , 2025 ,
25:37Bondi appeared on Fox News Sunday and
25:40reiterated everything , maintaining the
25:42exact same tone . She says President
25:46Trump's directive is clear : seek the
25:49death penalty whenever possible , and
25:51adds that if there have ever been death
25:54penalty cases , this is undoubtedly one
25:56of them . She also speaks of Mangione as
26:01a man who hunted down and executed a
26:03CEO , a father of two , and adds that she
26:06has received threats herself for
26:08seeking the death penalty , but assures
26:11she will not be stopped or intimidated .
26:20ever a death case . This is one this guy
26:23is charged with hunting down a CEO , a
26:26father of two , a married man , hunting
26:29him down and executing him . Yeah , I
26:33feel like these young people have lost
26:34their way . I was deaths for the death
26:38on someone who is charged with a CEO .
26:43Again , no reference to the presumption
26:46of innocence , only this very strong
26:48language that takes his guilt for
26:51granted . As if that weren't enough ,
26:54Bondi also opened an Instagram account
26:57and , in her first posts , shared a photo
26:59in front of the Department of Justice
27:01seal , writing once again what she had
27:04repeated in previous days : that the
27:06premeditated , cold-blooded murder of
27:08Brian Thompson shocked America and that
27:11, after careful evaluation , she ordered
27:13them to seek the death penalty , in line
27:15with the presidential agenda to stop
27:18violent crime . For Mangione's defense ,
27:22all of this reinforces the idea that
27:25the choice to pursue capital punishment
27:27was presented as a political move , and
27:30such a clear , public , and loaded
27:32communication obviously risks
27:34influencing any potential juror . And
27:38here , friends , the issue goes beyond
27:41Mangione's case ; the point isn't even
27:43whether Mangione is guilty or not ,
27:46because anyone could be in his place —
27:49any citizen could be . The issue , the
27:52real question for American citizens , is
27:54something else and is much bigger . If a
27:58defendant is publicly labeled guilty ,
28:00if the request for the death penalty is
28:02announced as part of a political agenda
28:05, if Mangione cannot have a fair trial ,
28:07can we really be sure that we would
28:09have one ? Luigi’s defense also
28:12insists on another point that is less
28:14high-profile , but very important . At
28:16the beginning , they say , Mangione
28:18wasn't even in the feds ' crosshairs .
28:21The proceedings started only at the
28:23state level , but then something
28:25happened . On December 19 , 2024 , the day
28:29of the famous " perp walk , " instead of
28:31being taken before the New York State
28:34Supreme Court , Luigi was taken — to the
28:36surprise of his lawyers , especially
28:38given the extremely tight timeframe —
28:41before the Federal Court . And look at
28:45that : just the day before , a federal
28:47judge had signed an indictment with
28:49four counts , including the third and
28:52fourth , which are the crucial ones that
28:54carry the death penalty as the maximum
28:56sentence . So , Mangione's defense is
29:00insinuating that the case was pushed to
29:03the federal level precisely to make the
29:05death penalty possible , because at the
29:08state level , as we’ve seen , it would
29:10never have been an option . And since
29:14the new Trump administration has openly
29:17declared that it wants to seek capital
29:19punishment whenever possible , the
29:21defense’s suspicion is this : that the
29:23move to the federal level wasn't
29:25accidental , but a way to reach a result
29:27that New York State alone could never
29:30have achieved , because , as I told you
29:32before , in New York State the death
29:34penalty doesn't exist ; it's illegal .
30:07Then the defense continues by writing
30:09that , according to the law , to justify
30:11the death penalty at the federal level ,
30:14aggravating factors must far outweigh
30:16mitigating ones , and in Mangione’s
30:18case , according to the defense , this is
30:20not the case . The only plausible
30:24aggravating factor , according to the
30:26defense , would be substantial planning
30:28and premeditation . Because the other
30:31alleged aggravating factor , that of
30:33having created a grave risk of death
30:35for other people , is described as
30:37baseless . Mangione allegedly shot at
30:41close range on a semi-deserted street
30:45and is accused of stalking only one
30:48person . On the mitigating side , however
30:51, the defense lists an absolutely
30:53positive personal background for
30:55Mangione . We talked about it in the
30:58first part : a balanced private life , an
31:00excellent academic path , etc. , and they
31:03argue that the case has nothing to do
31:05with other federal capital proceedings
31:07that involve murders committed , for
31:10example , within the scope of drug
31:12trafficking organizations , racketeering
31:14, or terrorism . On May 1st , the defense
31:18then filed a new motion asking that the
31:21murder charge filed by the state grand
31:23jury be dismissed due to double
31:25jeopardy . Double jeopardy is what we
31:29call " ne bis in idem " in Italy , a
31:31principle according to which no one can
31:34be tried twice for the same crime . As I
31:38was saying , in fact , some state and
31:40federal charges are almost identical ,
31:42and therefore two separate trials would
31:44be held . Practically for the same
31:47charges , which not only makes no sense ,
31:49but is also unconstitutional . Karen
31:52Agnifilo writes a very strong statement
31:54: she writes that in 2024 there were
31:57377 murders in New York , but only one ,
32:00that of the UnitedHealthcare CEO , has
32:03generated this tug-of-war between state
32:05and federal prosecutors who seem to be
32:08fighting over the fate of a
32:10twenty-year-old . Furthermore , the
32:14defense also asks that two other
32:16charges against Mangione be dropped ,
32:18namely those of terrorism , because to
32:21speak of terrorism , there must be an
32:23intent to intimidate the civilian
32:25population or influence government
32:27policies . And according to them , the
32:31evidence does not demonstrate this ,
32:33also because the terrorism charge
32:35exists only due to the existence of
32:37that notebook we talked about in part
32:39one , to which the name " manifesto " has
32:42been attributed . A manifesto , let's
32:45remember , is a written declaration that
32:47publicly sets out the intentions ,
32:49motives , or views of the issuer . But
32:53that notebook was found in Mangione’s
32:56backpack and was leaked illegally ; that
32:58is , Luigi did not leak it . Some police
33:02officer photographed the pages and sold
33:05the photos to the press , you see ? He
33:07did not , in fact , leak it . So , as far
33:09as we know , that notebook would have
33:11always remained private . Consequently ,
33:14one cannot speak of a manifesto , and if
33:16one cannot speak of a manifesto , one
33:19cannot speak of terrorism ; one can
33:21speak of murder . On September 16 , 2025 ,
| THE PEOPLE VS MANGIONE
33:28a state hearing takes place at the New
33:31York County Supreme Court , a very
33:33important hearing during which Judge
33:36Gregory Carro dismisses the two
33:38terrorism-related charges , deeming them
33:41legally insufficient . He explains that
33:47the evidence shows , at most , a desire
33:49to send a message against the
33:51healthcare industry , not to intimidate
33:54a population or influence the
33:56government . He even cites his writings ,
33:59the things written in that notebook
34:01where , if you remember , Mangione
34:03explicitly distinguishes himself from
34:05terrorists like the Luna Bomber .
34:08However , the other charges remain ,
34:10including second-degree intentional
34:12murder and weapons-related offenses .
34:15And the Double Jeopardy motion is also
34:18denied . You remember that rule stating
34:21you cannot be tried twice for the same
34:24act , because the defense argued that ,
34:26in essence , the state of New York and
34:29the federal government were trying
34:31Mangione for the same incident . But
34:35this is rejected because in the United
34:38States there is a principle called dual
34:41sovereignty . It means that the state
34:45and the federal government are two
34:47distinct sovereign entities . Each has
34:50its own laws , its own interests to
34:52protect , and its own authority .
34:54Therefore , if the same act violates
34:57both state and federal laws , it can be
35:00prosecuted in both systems without this
35:03being considered an illegitimate double
35:06trial . In other words , it is not the
35:09same trial twice , but two different
35:12trials before two different
35:13sovereignties . And that is why Judge
35:16Carro denies the defense's request . So
35:20there will effectively be two separate
35:22trials plus the one in Pennsylvania ,
35:24making it three . Let's talk instead
| COMMONWEALTH DELLA PENNSYLVANIA VS MANGIONE
35:29about the trial in Pennsylvania , which
35:31we haven't discussed yet , but there is
35:33a reason for that . As I was telling you
35:36, Mangione is in New York , currently
35:38detained at the MDC in Brooklyn , and
35:40the hearings for the Pennsylvania trial
35:43, for obvious reasons , take place in
35:45Pennsylvania , and Luigi Mangione wants
35:47to be physically present at these
35:50hearings , as is right . In the United
35:54States , the defendant's right to be
35:56present at their own trial and hearings
35:59is guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment ,
36:01which protects the right to a fair
36:03trial . And it is also guaranteed by the
36:07Due Process Clause of the Fifth and
36:09Fourteenth Amendments . Translated ,
36:11connecting remotely is not the same
36:14thing . Being in the courtroom means
36:16being able to speak with your lawyer
36:18without filters , observe reactions , and
36:20understand the atmosphere . In short , it
36:24is something else entirely ; otherwise ,
36:25there wouldn't be an amendment
36:27guaranteeing this right . Yet , in
36:30Mangione's case , for some reason , the
36:32federal government refused his transfer
36:35for that hearing , proposing virtual
36:37participation instead . And this creates
36:41a stalemate , because the defense
36:43maintains that physical presence is
36:44indeed a constitutional right . The
36:47government , on the other hand , says
36:48that a remote connection should be
36:50sufficient . It’s unclear why . Because
36:52, in fact , this is also
36:53unconstitutional . Regardless , as of
36:55today , this issue has not yet been
36:57resolved . Mangione continues to refuse
37:00to follow the hearings remotely . They
37:03continue to deny him the right to be
37:05transferred , so until they come to an
37:07agreement , the proceedings in
37:09Pennsylvania remain stalled and on hold
37:11. But the fact that they continue to
37:15deny his rights and treat him in an
37:17unconstitutional manner only
37:19strengthens the support network that
37:21has formed around him . But it doesn't
37:23end there . On September 23 , 2025 ,
37:26Luigi's defense filed a letter with the
37:29Court pointing out new public
37:31statements by members of the government
37:34. Specifically , on September 18 , Donald
37:38Trump stated the following on Fox News :
37:41" The fact that Mr. Mangione shot
37:43someone in the back is as clear as I am
37:46looking at you right now . " " He shot him
37:49right in the middle of the back ,
37:50killing him instantly . " And once again ,
38:03the defense returns to the same point :
38:05the presumption of innocence . When the
38:09highest political authorities speak
38:11like this about a defendant before a
38:13conviction , they are practically
38:14stripping all citizens of the right to
38:17a fair trial , not just Mangione . And as
38:20if that weren't enough , during the
38:22subsequent hearings , something comes
38:24out that truly infuriates Mangione’s
38:26supporters and others . It emerges how
| L’arresto
38:32his arrest actually unfolded , and the
38:35version that comes out in court is very
38:38different from the one told for months
38:41— the one where these almost heroic
38:43agents had stopped a dangerous
38:46terrorist — because the footage and
38:49testimony show that , once again , the
38:51police acted in a way that the defense
38:54openly defines as unconstitutional . On
38:59October 10 , 2025 , in fact , Mangione's
39:01defense formally filed a motion in
39:03court , asking the Court for a series of
39:06very serious measures . Essentially ,
39:09they argue that the arrest and the
39:11initial stages of the interrogation
39:13were handled illegitimately and ask
39:15that a fundamental portion of the
39:17evidence be excluded from the trial . In
39:21the document filed in court , the
39:22lawyers make three main requests . The
39:26first is the dismissal of two counts
39:29contained in the indictment , counts 3
39:31and 4 , which are two charges related to
39:34the use of a firearm and stalking
39:36during the alleged crimes . And the
39:40reason why the defense is asking for
39:42these two counts to be dismissed is
39:44very simple . These are the very counts
39:48that make the case eligible for the
39:51death penalty . If the judge decides to
39:55remove them from the indictment , the
39:57death penalty would automatically be
39:59off the table , and Mangione would no
40:01longer risk being sentenced to death .
40:05The second request the defense is
40:07making concerns the evidence found in
40:10Mangione’s backpack , which they claim
40:12was searched without a warrant .
40:15Therefore , they are asking to exclude
40:17this evidence for that reason . And not
40:20only was Mangione supposedly searched
40:22without a warrant , but according to
40:25this document , on the day of his arrest
40:27, he was allegedly questioned by the
40:30Altoona police without being read his
40:32rights — or rather , they were read to
40:34him after more than 20 minutes . In fact
40:38, the defense's third request is that
40:41the statements made by Mangione during
40:43those 20 minutes also be excluded from
40:46the trial . But I want to go into the
40:48details of this document and the
40:50dynamics of the arrest because it will
40:52be extremely important in the trial . So
40:55, the document describes step by step
40:57what really happened during Mangione's
40:59arrest . And at this point in the story ,
41:03this is the first time these details
41:05have been released , obviously thanks to
41:08the police bodycam footage that
41:10recorded everything . Of course , they
41:13record everything when they aren't
41:14covered or turned off for no apparent
41:16reason , but that is another matter we
41:18will get to shortly . Anyway , this is
41:20the actual sequence of events . As we
41:24already mentioned in the first part ,
41:26the Altoona police were called by the
41:28manager of the Altoona McDonald's , who
41:30reported the presence of a suspicious
41:32man who looked like the wanted suspect
41:34who shot Brian Thompson . Officers
41:37Joseph Detweiler and Tyler Fry appeared
41:40on the scene and approached Mangione ,
41:42who was sitting at a tucked-away table
41:45eating his hash browns . A table
41:48positioned against two walls . So
41:51Mangione had the table in front of him ,
41:53and then behind him and to his left , he
41:55had the wall . He had literally cornered
41:58himself . I’ll read verbatim from the
42:01document so I can't distort anything .
42:03Officers Detweiler and Fry positioned
42:05themselves to the right of Mr. Mangione
42:07, blocking his only exit from the table
42:09, given that he was already surrounded
42:11by two walls and a table . Officer
42:13Detweiler first asked Mr. Mangione to
42:15lower his mask , then asked for his name
42:17. Detweiler told him that someone had
42:19called the police because they found
42:21him suspicious . Both officers were
42:23fully armed , and their weapons were
42:25clearly visible . After asking to see
42:27identification , Mangione allegedly
42:29handed over a New Jersey driver's
42:31license in the name of Mark Rosario ,
42:33and Detweiler asked him if he was from
42:35New Jersey and if he had recently been
42:37to New York . As Mangione prepares to
42:39eat his food , Detweiler moves even
42:41closer and asks him what he was doing
42:43in New York . But before Mangione can
42:45even respond , Detweiler orders him to
42:47stand up and put his hands over his
42:49head , grabbing his right wrist and
42:50pulling him up . Detweiler asks him why
42:53he is nervous while searching him . He
42:55then orders him to sit back down at the
42:58table and tells Officer Fry to talk to
43:00Mangione , gesturing for him to move in
43:02closer to reinforce that Mangione
43:05cannot leave . But as the videos show ,
43:07Mangione is cooperative and complies
43:09with every request . While Officer Fry
43:12effectively keeps Mangione in custody
43:14by standing next to him and blocking
43:16any possible exit , Officer Detweiler
43:18goes outside to call another officer ,
43:21telling him he is 100 % sure that
43:22Mangione is the person wanted in
43:24connection with the December 4 , 2024 ,
43:27shooting in New York . Detweiler
43:30re-enters the McDonald's and continues
43:32questioning Mangione , asking him again
43:34if he is from New Jersey , what he is
43:35doing in Altoona , and if he has been in
43:37New York recently . Although Detweiler
43:41has already decided that Mangione is
43:43the New York shooting suspect , he tells
43:44Mangione , as a pretext for the police
43:46interaction , that they are there
43:48because Mangione has been at the
43:50McDonald's for 40 minutes . Fry remains
43:53in his strategic position blocking the
43:55exit , while Detweiler continues the
43:57interrogation . At 9:41 , 12 minutes
43:59after the first contact with Mangione ,
44:01Detweiler moves a backpack from the
44:03floor where Fry is blocking the passage
44:06, taking it to a spot out of Mangione's
44:08reach . Over the next minute , five more
44:11armed , uniformed officers enter the
44:13back area of the McDonald's where
44:15Mangione is now trapped . Detweiler
44:18orders another officer to position
44:20himself next to Fry , forming a kind of
44:22armed human wall that traps Mangione in
44:24the back of the restaurant . He then
44:28goes back outside to talk to other
44:29officers and confirm that Mangione
44:31matches the description of the New York
44:32suspect . When Detweiler re-enters the
44:36McDonald's at 9:45 , three officers are
44:37surrounding Mangione , and his backpack
44:39is about 2 meters away from him on a
44:41table , with two officers positioned
44:43between Mangione and the backpack . At
44:469:46 , with eight officers now present ,
44:48another officer asks Detweiler if he
44:51has read Mangione his rights , as
44:53required by the 1966 Supreme Court
44:55decision in Miranda v . Arizona . And
44:59when Detweiler replies that he has not ,
45:01the other officer tells him to inform
45:03Mangione that he is under official
45:05investigation and to read him his
45:06rights . Detweiler tells Mangione that
45:09he is under official investigation and
45:11that he will be arrested for providing
45:13false information if he provides a fake
45:15ID again . However , he does not read him
45:17his rights despite the instructions
45:20received . Detweiler then continues the
45:22interrogation without reading his
45:24rights , asking if his name is Mark
45:25Rosario . Mangione answers no . Detweiler
45:29then asks for his real name and date of
45:31birth , which Mangione provides . Another
45:33officer asks him twice why he lied
45:35about his name . Here , although it is
45:38not written in the document , it seems
45:40that Luigi answered this question by
45:42saying he clearly shouldn't have done
45:44it . Meaning , he replies something like :
45:45" I clearly shouldn't have lied . " At
45:47that point , nine officers surround
45:49Mangione and block his exit from
45:51McDonald's . At 9:48 , nearly 20 minutes
45:54after the first police contact and
45:56after numerous interrogation questions ,
45:58Officer Steven Fox finally reads
46:00Mangione his rights . After explaining
46:03his constitutional right to remain
46:05silent , Fox asks if he wants to talk to
46:07the police , but Mangione exercises his
46:09right to silence and says he does not
46:11want to speak with law enforcement . Fox
46:14tells him he is not in custody at this
46:16moment , despite there being 10 officers
46:18in the back of the McDonald's and
46:20Mangione clearly being surrounded and
46:22not free to leave . Fox then asks him
46:25why he has a false identity . Mangione
46:27does not respond . Fox orders him to
46:30stand up and put his hands against the
46:32wall to be searched , and as the videos
46:34show , Mangione obeys all directives . At
46:379:50 , about 90 seconds after telling
46:40Mangione he is not in custody , Fox
46:42handcuffs him and searches him
46:44thoroughly again . Mangione remains
46:47standing , handcuffed and surrounded by
46:49officers , while they wait for his
46:50identity to be verified . At 9:54 ,
46:53Detweiler leaves McDonald's to discuss
46:55the identification with another officer
46:57. During this conversation , he covers
47:00the bodycam with his hand for about 20
47:02seconds , preventing the camera from
47:04recording . At 9:58 , some officers begin
47:07searching Mangione's jacket and pockets
47:10again . At the same time , Officer
47:12Christi Wasser and Officer Fox begin
47:15searching the backpack that the police
47:17had moved to a table out of Mangione's
47:19reach over 17 minutes earlier . During
47:23this warrantless search , Wasser opens
47:25the backpack and fully checks all of
47:27its compartments and contents ,
47:29including closed bags inside the
47:31backpack , while Mangione is handcuffed
47:33and surrounded by officers . Fox finds a
47:36small object wrapped in cardboard and
47:39duct tape . He opens it with a knife and
47:41finds a computer chip . The officers
47:44continue the warrantless search of the
47:46backpack , even after Mangione is taken
47:48away from McDonald's and transferred to
47:49the police station . During this search ,
47:54Wasser finds a pistol magazine with
47:56rounds and , realizing the potential
47:58mistake of searching a murder suspect's
48:01backpack without a warrant , Wasser
48:03suddenly declares that she is checking
48:05it to make sure there isn't a bomb or
48:08something similar . Shortly after ,
48:11another officer says : " Now that we
48:13found this , let's take it to the
48:15station . " Wasser puts the items back in
48:17the backpack and stops the search . At
48:2010:04 AM , Wasser leaves McDonald's with
48:22the backpack . But something very
48:26important happens here , because for 11
48:29minutes there is no bodycam footage of
48:32Officer Chrissy Wasser while she drives
48:36to the police station . So the officers ,
48:40while transporting Mangione's backpack
48:42to the police station , turned off their
48:45bodycams for 11 minutes . At 10:16 AM ,
48:48one minute after arriving at the
48:50station , Wasser resumes the warrantless
48:53search of the backpack . She opens a
48:56compartment , closes it , and opens the
48:58front one as if she were looking for
48:59something specific , and finds a gun
49:01there . After finding the weapon , Wasser
49:05says again that at the McDonald's she
49:06was checking the backpack to ensure
49:08there were no bombs , but she does not
49:10explain why she didn't request a
49:11warrant once she arrived at the station
49:13. She then continues to search the
49:17backpack in the station hallway without
49:19a warrant , finding a silencer , a red
49:21notebook with personal writings , other
49:23documents , a computer chip , an iPhone ,
49:25and several USB drives . More than 7
49:29hours later , at 5:14 PM , the Altoona
49:32police finally request a search warrant
49:35. They request authorization to search
49:39and seize the same items that the
49:41police had already searched and seized
49:44that morning . So the gun , the silencer ,
49:47the notebook that was defined as a
49:50manifesto , and the other items like the
49:53USB drives and the iPhone — the
49:55contents of which are still unknown to
49:58this day — were found primarily
50:00illegally , as the result of a
50:02warrantless search , but above all , they
50:05were found after the police bodycams
50:07had been turned off . And I remind you
50:11that bodycams exist for a reason ; they
50:14serve to record interactions between
50:16police and citizens , creating video
50:18evidence of what happens during
50:20encounters . They are for transparency ,
50:23evidence collection , and accountability
50:26, so that facts can be reconstructed
50:28and disputes over what really happened
50:30can be avoided . Therefore , as is to be
50:33expected , Mangione's defense is asking
50:35to exclude from the trial the contents
50:37of the backpack found by searching it
50:39without a warrant , but especially after
50:41the cameras were , in fact , turned off
50:43for 11 minutes . Because what happened
50:46in those 11 minutes ? Who can tell us ,
50:48and how can we be sure it's the truth ?
50:52Meanwhile , while newspapers and
50:54politicians describe Mangione as a
50:56monster , a dangerous terrorist , and a
50:59cold-blooded killer , a very different
51:01image of him is emerging from inside
51:03the prison . In fact , it is reported
51:08that Mangione is a model prisoner , a
51:10point of reference for other inmates
51:13and even the guards , so much so that he
51:16earned the nickname " The Ambassador , "
51:19because , apparently , he helps new
51:21inmates when they arrive : he explains
51:24how prison life works , how to get food ,
51:27how to use the phone , and what
51:30behaviors to avoid . This brings us to
| Le ultime udienze
51:54the latest hearings we attended , which
51:57were actually suppression hearings —
52:00preliminary hearings where the judge
52:02decides whether certain evidence can be
52:05used in the trial or not . So , in this
52:10hearing , they are theoretically
52:13supposed to decide the start date of
52:16the trial and discuss ... ... basically
52:21excluding or dismissing two charges
52:23against Mangione , count 3 and count 4 .
52:26The defense will have 30 minutes , and
52:28the prosecution will have 30 minutes .
52:30This is a federal hearing for the
52:31federal trial , which therefore includes
52:32the possibility of the death penalty .
52:34So , the death penalty is still on the
52:35table .
52:37Yes , the death penalty is still on the
52:38table , and that is why they are trying
52:40to dismiss these charges . They let in a
52:43group of the public , some supporters .
52:47Press access is separate ; there is a
52:50separate hallway . We arrived early ,
52:52registered at 7:00 AM , and now , at
52:5410:30 AM , we will go in ourselves .
52:57The first hearing we attended was on
52:59January 9 , 2026 , and it concerned the
53:02famous illegally searched backpack .
53:09During the hearing , Luigi's defense
53:11explains to Judge Margaret Garnett that
53:14the backpack and consequently its
53:16contents , as we mentioned before ,
53:19should not be admitted as evidence at
53:21trial . Remember , these are preliminary
53:25hearings ; the trial has not started yet
53:27because , specifically , it was seized
53:29and searched illegally . However , the
53:33judge reasons with them and says that
53:35it is normal that they took and
53:37searched the backpack , because what
53:39were they supposed to do ? Leave it
53:41there ? I mean , Mangione was alone ,
53:43there was no one else to leave this
53:45backpack with . The backpack was his ; he
53:47was asked about it . And from the moment
53:50he was placed under arrest , it is
53:52normal that the backpack was also
53:54recovered and searched by the officers .
53:57There is a bit of back-and-forth
53:59between the defense and the judge on
54:01this point , but no real decision is
54:03reached . In fact , the defense proposes
54:07setting a hearing dedicated exclusively
54:09to the backpack issue , and at that
54:11moment , Judge Garnet doesn't say yes or
54:13no , but reserves the right to think
54:15about it . Then we move on to the famous
54:19charges 3 and 4 , the ones that bring
54:22the case under capital punishment ,
54:24which the defense asked to have
54:26dismissed . From here , the hearing
54:30becomes very , very technical because
54:32you should know that in American trials
54:35, there's this practice of continually
54:38citing past cases similar to the one
54:41being discussed . In the United States .
54:43Indeed , the legal system functions
54:45largely through so-called precedents .
54:48In practice , they look at decisions
54:50made in similar cases in previous years
54:52to understand how the law should be
54:54interpreted in the current case as well
54:56. That is , past rulings become binding
55:00for cases of the present and the future
55:02. So , if in similar past cases that
55:05specific charge was not brought or the
55:08death penalty was not deemed applicable
55:10, then it becomes much harder to argue
55:13that it should be in the Mangione case .
55:17So for hours , let's say the defense and
55:19the prosecution went back and forth
55:21with the judge , citing various past
55:23cases and various past rulings . And it
55:27was obviously all very technical and
55:29difficult to follow , not just for me ,
55:31but actually also for many journalists
55:33present whom I chatted with in the
55:35bathroom after the hearing . But
55:38surprisingly , a few days later , Judge
55:40Garnet agrees to add an extra hearing
55:43to discuss the backpack issue . Do you
55:46remember ? She had said : " I'll think
55:47about it " and . Then , a few days later ,
55:50she decided yes , and decided to call an
55:52Altuna police officer to testify ,
55:55almost in the capacity of a consultant :
55:57that is , an officer from that police
56:00department , but obviously unrelated to
56:02the case and not present on the day of
56:05Mangione's arrest to avoid conflicts of
56:07interest , who can explain in detail the
56:10correct procedures to follow during an
56:12arrest , so as to determine once and for
56:16all whether the officers behaved
56:18according to the rules that day or not .
56:22So , it's 0 ° C , feels like -8 ° C .
56:27This morning we went to register to be
56:29able to enter the courtroom , and there
56:32was actually no one outside , whereas
56:34last time on the 9th , when it was
56:36definitely warmer , there was already a
56:39line of people who had slept there in
56:41front . I passed by last night and there
56:44was no one there anyway , because the
56:46temperature this morning was 8 , feels
56:47like , last night it was minus 11 . It
56:52was truly impossible to think about
56:53spending the night out there with the
56:55cold there was .
56:59This hearing takes place on January 23 ,
57:012026 . We also attended this one , and
57:05Officer Nathan Snyder , deputy chief of
57:07the Altuna police , is called to the
57:09stand to testify . His task is precisely
57:13, uh , to explain to the Court what the
57:16standard police procedures are when an
57:18arrest is made , particularly when a
57:21suspect has personal items with them ,
57:23as in the case of Mangione and his
57:25backpack . Snyider , uh , then describes
57:28the rules that officers should , in
57:31theory , follow . An arrested person's
57:34belongings must be secured , cataloged ,
57:37and registered , and in many cases , they
57:39cannot be searched in detail without a
57:42warrant , unless there are immediate
57:44security concerns . And it is precisely
57:48on this point that the defense focuses ,
57:50because according to them , what
57:52happened with Mangione's backpack did
57:54not follow these procedures . The
57:56hearing , however , concludes after a
57:58couple of hours , and obviously , the
58:00judge makes no decision right then and
58:02there . The last federal hearing is held
58:07on January 30th , the most important one
58:09. In fact , we extended our stay in New
58:12York just to be able to attend . So , the
58:16hearing starts at 11:00 in the morning ,
58:18okay ? But we head over around 7:30 to
58:21get on the , uh , press list to secure a
58:24decent seat in the courtroom . And
58:27around 9:00 in the morning , while we
58:30are still waiting there , I get a
58:32notification because I have alerts set
58:35for the Mangione case . Judge Margaret
58:39Garnett has just filed a document , a
58:42document announcing that she has
58:44officially dismissed counts 3 and 4
58:47against Luigi Mangione , and this means
58:50something very simple . The death
58:54penalty in the federal trial is
58:55officially off the table , but she made
58:57this decision and filed the document
58:59before the start of the hearing , like 2
59:01hours earlier . When we arrive at the
59:04courthouse , in fact , the atmosphere is
59:06very tense . By the way , we went through
59:09security to enter the courthouse
59:11alongside Karen Agnifilo and Mangione's
59:14entire defense team , who , while waiting
59:16in line , shared that they also received
59:18the judge's notification while they
59:21were on their way to court — meaning
59:23not even they knew anything . And while
59:27we were talking about this , we hear
59:30Mangione's supporters cheering at the
59:32news . But only for a second . And one
59:36thing I noticed is that they are keen
59:38on being very respectful precisely
59:40because they want to be taken seriously
59:42, so they cheer in unison for a second
59:44inside the courthouse and then that's
59:46it , silence returns . The hearing begins
59:50at 11:00 , and Luigi Mangione is always
59:52very calm in every hearing . These are
59:56federal hearings , so cameras are not
59:57permitted . There are no photos of him
1:00:00in these hearings , but his demeanor is
1:00:03calm ; he is very serious , attentive ,
1:00:05sometimes takes notes , and is serious
1:00:07even in this specific hearing , despite
1:00:09the fact that there is great news for
1:00:12him , because he no longer faces the
1:00:14death penalty , but he never loses his
1:00:16composure . The judge , during the
1:00:19hearing , reiterates her decision .
1:00:22Counts 3 and 4 against Mangione have
1:00:24been dismissed , so unless the
1:00:26prosecution files an appeal regarding
1:00:29this decision , this is no longer a
1:00:31capital case . To date , the prosecution
1:00:34has not appealed , so it is official
1:00:36that Mangione no longer faces the death
1:00:38penalty ; even if he were to be
1:00:39convicted , the death penalty is simply
1:00:41no longer on the table . The judge also
1:00:44announces her decision regarding the
1:00:46backpack . On this point , she
1:00:49establishes that the backpack and all
1:00:51its contents will be admitted as
1:00:54evidence in the trial , and finally , she
1:00:56also sets possible dates for the start
1:00:59of the trial . Now that the death
1:01:01penalty is off the table , the entire
1:01:03process becomes much faster because
1:01:05capital trials are much more complex
1:01:06and require months of additional
1:01:08preparation . Judge Garnett therefore
1:01:10sets a schedule . Jury selection will
1:01:13begin on September 8 , 2026 , while
1:01:15opening arguments for the trial are
1:01:18scheduled for October 13 , 2026 . There
1:01:22is just one problem , because as soon as
1:01:24Judge Garnett sets these dates for the
1:01:26federal trial , the State of New York
1:01:28intervenes and says , " Wait a minute ,
1:01:30wait a minute , we were here first . "
1:01:35According to state prosecutors , in fact
1:01:37, the state trial must take place
1:01:39before the federal one , remaining
1:01:41perfectly in line with the feeling we
1:01:44have had for months , which is that the
1:01:46two prosecutors are arguing over this
1:01:48case a bit like it were a toy .
1:01:53Initially , Judge Carro , the judge for
1:01:55the state trial , had decided that the
1:01:57state proceedings would begin on June 8
1:02:00, 2026 ; but for Mangione's defense , it
1:02:02would have been humanly impossible to
1:02:05prepare for this trial , the state one ,
1:02:07and then the federal one only a few
1:02:09months later : the state one in June and
1:02:12the federal one in September . So Judge
1:02:16Carro decided on a new schedule . The
1:02:20state trial , or rather , jury selection
1:02:22for the state trial , will begin on
1:02:25September 8 , 2026 , and during this
1:02:27hearing , the one in which Judge Carro
1:02:29established that the state trial will
1:02:32begin in September , Luigi Mangione
1:02:34spoke before being taken out of the
1:02:36courtroom ; he said : " It's the same
1:02:39trial twice , 1 + 1 equals 2 , and double
1:02:41jeopardy by any definition of common
1:02:44sense . " You always remember this double
1:02:48jeopardy , the principle that you cannot
1:02:50be tried twice for the same crime . Then
1:03:08, on May 18 , Judge Carro decided which
1:03:11evidence will be admitted at the state
1:03:14trial : the gun , the famous notebook ,
1:03:17and other items found inside the
1:03:19backpack after Luigi's arrest ; but he
1:03:22excludes from the trial all items found
1:03:25before Luigi was taken away , namely the
1:03:28gun magazine , the cell phone , the
1:03:31passport , and the wallet . Then , in June
1:03:36of this year , 2026 , something bizarre
1:03:40happened that no one really understood :
1:03:43Judge Carro declared that Mangione
1:03:46intends to present a psychiatric
1:03:49defense in the state trial , meaning his
1:03:52lawyers will use the defense that he
1:03:56acted under extreme emotional
1:03:58disturbance at the time of the crime .
1:04:04Too bad that just the next day his
1:04:06lawyers backtracked and informed the
1:04:08same judge that no , they had changed
1:04:10their minds . Mangione does not intend
1:04:13to pursue a psychiatric defense .
1:04:16People's reactions to this somewhat
1:04:18confusing change of direction are
1:04:20equally confused . People do not
1:04:23understand what is happening . On forums
1:04:26like Reddit , people are exchanging
1:04:28opinions on the matter . They wonder why
1:04:31they wanted a psychiatric defense ,
1:04:34since that would still mean assuming
1:04:36Luigi committed the act , essentially an
1:04:39admission of guilt , while he has
1:04:42pleaded not guilty . Many speculate that
1:04:46the defense wants to try to obtain a
1:04:49lighter sentence , such as manslaughter
1:04:51instead of murder , but many are
1:04:53reflecting on something that will be
1:04:55useful shortly , so follow me . Many
1:04:59wonder , if you build a defense in the
1:05:02state trial that basically starts from
1:05:04the assumption that Luigi killed
1:05:07Thomson , what consequences could this
1:05:09have in the federal proceeding and vice
1:05:12versa ; I mean , he has to face two
1:05:15trials with more or less the same
1:05:17charges , right ? But if in one he
1:05:20defends himself by basically saying yes
1:05:23, I did it because I was extremely
1:05:24disturbed , then won't that be used
1:05:26against him in the other trial ? And
1:05:30this is not just paranoia born on
1:05:33Reddit , because Karen Agnifilo herself ,
1:05:36Luigi's lawyer , later raised this issue
1:05:38in court , arguing that making materials
1:05:41related to a possible psychiatric
1:05:44defense public could prejudice Luigi in
1:05:47the other federal trial . In any case ,
1:05:51when the defense suddenly backtracked
1:05:53the following day and announced that ,
1:05:55precisely , they will no longer use this
1:05:58strategy , people inevitably all ask
1:06:00themselves the same question . What
1:06:03happened in those 24 hours ? Did the
1:06:06lawyers change their minds ? Did Luigi
1:06:07change his mind ? Did they face pressure
1:06:10from somewhere ? We don't know . But the
1:06:13real plot twist , friends , happens on
1:06:15August 14th . Essentially , on August
| I shot Mr. Thompson
1:06:2212th , Luigi's defense and the federal
1:06:25prosecution jointly filed a rather
1:06:27unusual , and above all , sudden request .
1:06:32They asked Judge Margaret Garnett , the
1:06:35federal trial judge , to schedule a new
1:06:37hearing just two days later , on August
1:06:4014th at 11:00 a.m. They did not
1:06:42publicly explain the reason nor why the
1:06:45request came with such short notice .
1:06:49Obviously , speculation immediately
1:06:52began regarding a possible deal , a plea
1:06:55bargain , and especially a change in
1:06:59Luigi's plea . And indeed , friends , on
1:07:06August 14th Luigi Mangione enters that
1:07:09courtroom and does something he had
1:07:11never done until that moment . He pleads
1:07:15guilty to both federal counts of
1:07:18stalking . At the federal level , he was
1:07:22charged with two counts of stalking
1:07:24resulting in the death of Brian
1:07:26Thompson , but above all , before the
1:07:28judge , he explicitly admits that he was
1:07:31the one who killed him . I will read his
1:07:34exact words to you because , since it is
1:07:36a federal hearing , no videos exist as
1:07:38cameras are not allowed in the
1:07:39courtroom . Luigi asks to remain seated
1:07:43and says these words . After years spent
1:07:47enduring severe pain caused by a back
1:07:49problem , dealing with the obstacles of
1:07:51the health insurance system , and
1:07:54witnessing the similar experiences of
1:07:56countless other people , I discovered
1:07:58that UnitedHealthcare would hold its
1:08:01annual investor conference in New York
1:08:03on December 4 , 2024 , although the
1:08:05precise location had not been made
1:08:07public . I then did some research online
1:08:11about the event . I noticed that the
1:08:14annual conference of the largest
1:08:15American healthcare organization , whose
1:08:18stated mission is to make the
1:08:19healthcare system work better for
1:08:21everyone , would be attended by company
1:08:23executives , the board of directors , and
1:08:25hundreds of investors , not doctors ,
1:08:27nurses , and patients . In November 2024 ,
1:08:31I arrived in Manhattan from outside New
1:08:33York state . I then sent an email to
1:08:37UnitedHealth executives , posing as an
1:08:39investor from a firm managing over 50
1:08:41billion dollars in assets , and asking
1:08:43for information about the conference .
1:08:47Unlike my previous interactions with
1:08:49insurance companies , I received an
1:08:50immediate response within an hour .
1:08:54Before traveling to New York , I used a
1:08:563D printer to make a part for a gun and
1:08:58equipped the weapon with a silencer and
1:09:00a magazine . I traveled to New York and
1:09:04sent that email to UnitedHealthcare
1:09:06with the intention of shooting Brian
1:09:07Thompson . On the morning of December 4 ,
1:09:112024 , I shot Mr. Thompson in Manhattan ,
1:09:14and he died . In doing so , I was aware
1:09:17that my actions would cause him to fear
1:09:20for his life or suffer serious physical
1:09:22injury . I knew what I was doing was
1:09:25illegal . And then the judge asks him : "
1:09:29Mr. Mangione , how do you plead now to
1:09:31counts one and two of the indictment ? "
1:09:34And he answers : " Guilty . " The judge
1:09:38then informs him that the sentence for
1:09:40this type of crime starts at 292 months
1:09:42, or 24 years and 4 months , and
1:09:44declares she will issue the sentence on
1:09:47December 18th . Luigi Mangione therefore
1:09:51pleads guilty to federal charges of
1:09:54stalking resulting in death . People's
1:09:57reactions are mixed because his
1:10:00confession doesn't end the polarization
1:10:03that has always surrounded him . Some
1:10:07simply see it as the definitive
1:10:10confirmation of his guilt . For others ,
1:10:14it's a desperate or extremely
1:10:16calculated courtroom scene ; but there
1:10:18are those who , even with Luigi
1:10:21explaining in his own words that he
1:10:23planned and committed the murder ,
1:10:25continue to claim he's innocent :
1:10:27arguing he confessed only as part of a
1:10:30strategic move we don't yet know , or
1:10:33worse , because he was forced by
1:10:35pressure from above , political pressure
1:10:37. We've seen how this case has also
1:10:40become a political matter . Hard to like
1:11:04it . First of all , no remorse whatsoever
1:11:07. You know , I'm a human . I'm empathetic
1:11:09. I feel really bad that somebody has
1:11:12to really feel bad for the Thomson
1:11:13family . Um , but you know , it's just
1:11:16unfortunate that , you know , Bri Thomson
1:11:18a system in place and you know , we just
1:11:20need a better system . Do you feel like
1:11:24Bri Thomson's life was the for better
1:11:26use of words like this whole thing come
1:11:29out of it like this the protesting and
1:11:31all that against the health system ? Do
1:11:34you think his life was worth that ? Um
1:11:36in a way it's really unfortunate that
1:11:38someone had to die to spark the
1:11:39conversations that we're now having but
1:11:41unfortunately that's the way it is . His
1:11:44death resulted in us having these tough
1:11:46conversations about health inequality
1:11:48and people suffering in Amer . You feel
1:11:51like it was worth it on that sense ? Not
1:11:53necessarily worth it , but I can
1:11:54understand like the effects that have
1:11:56come from it . But we live in a civil
1:11:58society governed by the rule of law . We
1:12:02debate , we disagree , we protest murder .
| La pistola
1:12:19I read a comment , right under my own
1:12:22post on the topic , in which this person
1:12:24wrote that it's impossible for Luigi to
1:12:27have created the gun with a 3D printer ,
1:12:30because the 3D printer , or at least the
1:12:32software for designing objects to print
1:12:35, has security blocks that prevent the
1:12:37creation of dangerous items , such as
1:12:40weapons . And I'll take this opportunity
1:12:43to explain something I found
1:12:45interesting . The Wired Investigation
1:12:49YouTube channel created the exact same
1:12:52weapon in the exact same way Luigi did .
1:12:56In fact , Luigi didn't print the whole
1:12:58weapon , he says so himself . I printed
1:13:00part of the weapon . He only printed a
1:13:03part , or rather two , because he also
1:13:05printed the silencer . The silencer and
1:13:08then the frame , which is the grip
1:13:11structure , the very part , by the way ,
1:13:13that normally allows for the legal
1:13:16identification of a weapon through the
1:13:19serial number ; so , by 3D printing it ,
1:13:21the gun cannot be traced via a standard
1:13:24serial number . The other parts , all the
1:13:28mechanisms and so on , he simply ordered
1:13:31online from various sites that sell
1:13:33them as spare parts and then assembled
1:13:35everything together . In fact , a gun
1:13:39assembled this way functions
1:13:41differently from a normal weapon . A
1:13:45weapon assembled this way , especially
1:13:48with the silencer , jams . Indeed , if you
1:13:51recall in the video of the Brian
1:13:53Thompson murder , the attacker , whom we
1:13:56now know to be Luigi Mangione , has his
1:13:58gun jam the first time he fires , and he
1:14:00makes a very specific movement with his
1:14:03hands to make it work . It's as if he
1:14:05were giving it a boost , I don't know
1:14:07how else to explain it to you . Well , in
1:14:09the video I mentioned earlier by Wired
1:14:11Investigation , the exact same thing
1:14:12happens to him . The gun jams in the
1:14:16exact same way and it needs to be used ,
1:14:19let's say , in a particular way , exactly
1:14:21as Luigi does in that video ; which
1:14:24would also demonstrate that in order to
1:14:26use it , to still fire five shots in a
1:14:29row after the first jam , he must have
1:14:31trained , he must have practiced a lot ,
1:14:34he must have greatly premeditated this
1:14:36crime . In any case , returning to
| Double Jeopardy
1:14:43Luigi's confession , after the hearing
1:14:44ended , his lawyer Karen Agnifilo issued
1:14:46a statement outside the courthouse . I
1:14:49will quote her exact words . Today is a
1:14:52solemn and important day . With
1:14:54today’s guilty plea , Mr. Mangione has
1:14:56taken full responsibility for the death
1:14:58of Brian Thompson . It was a single
1:15:02tragic event , yet he is being tried
1:15:05twice for the same conduct . As Luigi
1:15:09explained in court today , for years he
1:15:11suffered from severe and debilitating
1:15:14pain following a back problem , while
1:15:16trying to navigate our healthcare and
1:15:18health insurance system . Like the
1:15:22thousands of people who contacted us
1:15:24after this tragedy to share their own
1:15:26experiences , he too felt that the
1:15:28system had abandoned him and destroyed
1:15:30his life . Even though this was a single
1:15:33, isolated incident , Mr. Mangione has
1:15:36been treated unfairly from the
1:15:37beginning in every respect . He managed
1:15:41to get the terrorism charges dropped
1:15:43and avoid the death penalty , while at
1:15:45the same time finding himself facing
1:15:47two parallel proceedings in two
1:15:49different jurisdictions that are trying
1:15:51to punish him twice for exactly the
1:15:53same conduct . He has been treated
1:15:56differently than any other defendant
1:15:58accused of this crime in the state of
1:15:59New York . Fortunately , however , New
1:16:02York law does not allow this . New York
1:16:06law does not permit a person to be
1:16:08tried and punished twice for the exact
1:16:10same crime under a rule governing
1:16:12successive prosecutions , also known as
1:16:14the Double Jeopardy law . Today's guilty
1:16:18plea triggers the application of this
1:16:21rule , and we have just filed a motion
1:16:23in State Court explaining why the state
1:16:26charges must be dismissed by virtue of
1:16:28the protections provided by the State
1:16:30of New York against Double Jeopardy .
1:16:34Here we are . So Luigi Mangione pleaded
1:16:37guilty in federal court to get the
1:16:40state charges dropped , avoid the state
1:16:42trial , and therefore be convicted only ,
1:16:45in quotes , of stalking resulting in
1:16:48death . So there is no plea deal as was
1:16:52initially thought . This is a strategy ,
1:16:56but a very risky strategy , friends ,
1:16:58because do you remember when Karen
1:17:01herself said that revealing their state
1:17:04defense strategy publicly could have
1:17:06compromised Mangione's federal trial ?
1:17:10Well , now she is doing practically the
1:17:12same thing herself . Mangione is charged
1:17:15federally with stalking resulting in
1:17:17death , so not with murder . In state
1:17:20court , he is charged with murder . The
1:17:23problem is that by pleading guilty to
1:17:25the stalking charges , he has
1:17:27essentially confessed to the murder ;
1:17:29that is , he didn't say , " Yes , I
1:17:31followed Mr. Thompson , I sought out the
1:17:33conference , I posed as an investor , but
1:17:35then I did nothing . " He said , " I went
1:17:38there , I shot him , I knew he would fear
1:17:41for his life , I was conscious of what I
1:17:43was doing . " So , if Judge Carro , the
1:17:47state judge , does not agree to drop the
1:17:49charges , if he does not believe the
1:17:51case falls under Double Jeopardy law ,
1:17:54not only will Luigi go to trial , but
1:17:56his confession will , in all likelihood ,
1:17:59be used against him in that trial ,
1:18:01because he has already confessed to
1:18:03what he is accused of in a trial that
1:18:06has yet to take place ; but , in reality ,
1:18:08it might not be that way . Or rather ,
1:18:13according to Niama Ramani , who is an
1:18:15attorney and former American federal
1:18:17prosecutor , this strategy might not
1:18:20actually be a winning one . Moreover ,
1:18:24according to him , Luigi's defense has
1:18:26completely cornered the federal
1:18:28prosecutors . Rami literally says the
1:18:31defense set a trap for the feds and
1:18:34they fell for it hook , line , and sinker
1:18:36. And he goes as far as to say this
1:18:40could go down as one of the
1:18:41worst-handled federal prosecutions in
1:18:43American history , because normally in
1:18:45the U.S. there is nothing stopping the
1:18:48state and the federal government from
1:18:50trying someone separately for the same
1:18:52facts . I explained this to you in this
1:18:55very video , right ? There is this dual
1:18:57sovereignty that allows exactly that .
1:19:00But New York State is different ; it
1:19:03works differently because it has a
1:19:05state law that prevents a second
1:19:08prosecution in the state for the same
1:19:11criminal episode . And so , this is the
1:19:13point . The federal stalking charge
1:19:15Luigi just pleaded guilty to is part of
1:19:18the same criminal episode as the murder
1:19:20charge brought by New York State . So
1:19:23those state charges , now that the
1:19:25federal case has concluded because he
1:19:28pleaded guilty , must be dismissed .
1:19:32According to Rami , the feds ' mistake
1:19:34was letting the federal proceeding
1:19:36reach a guilty plea first , because , as
1:19:39he explains , if the state had gone
1:19:41first and then the feds , this double
1:19:43jeopardy problem wouldn't have existed .
1:19:48By letting the federal proceeding go
1:19:50first , they essentially created the
1:19:53problem the defense is now using to try
1:19:56and throw out the murder trial .
1:19:59Obviously , the murder charges are more
1:20:01serious than the stalking charges . And
1:20:03Rami also adds something important .
1:20:06Even if Judge Carro were to reject this
1:20:09motion and the trial were to go ahead
1:20:11anyway , the problem has now been
1:20:14created because if Luigi were convicted
1:20:17, the double jeopardy issue could be
1:20:19raised again on appeal . Anyway , I'm
1:20:23recording this video on August 20th , I
1:20:25think it's the 20th or the — ah no ,
1:20:27it's the 21st . Earlier I said the 20th .
1:20:29It's August 21 , 2026 , and as of today ,
1:20:32this is the information we have . A few
1:20:34days ago , Judge Carro announced he will
1:20:37respond to the defense's motion by
1:20:40October 9th regarding the request to
1:20:43dismiss the charges due to double
1:20:45jeopardy and . Defense attorneys will
1:20:48have until October 30th to respond in
1:20:50turn , and as things stand , the next
1:20:53hearing is set for December 10th ; so he
1:20:56pushed back the hearing , which was
1:20:58scheduled for September 8th , by two
1:21:01months . Today , friends . This is all the
1:21:04information I had on this case .
1:21:07Obviously , new information comes out at
1:21:08any moment , so if there are any updates
1:21:10, I will keep you posted as always . If
1:21:13this trial happens , I will go , we will
1:21:15go . There is no way , apparently , that I
1:21:20can go to New York in months that
1:21:22aren't the coldest in the world , but
1:21:24that's fine . That said , friends , I
1:21:28thank you for spending all this time
1:21:30with me again today and I'll see you in
1:21:32the next video . Bye