Free YouTube Transcribe

Video transcript

"HO SPARATO A MR. THOMPSON" - IL CASO MANGIONE - PARTE 2

Elisa True Crime · 12,938 words · 59 min read

Want to search this transcript, jump the video from any line, or download it as TXT, SRT, or VTT?

Open in the transcript tool

Full transcript

| Introduzione

0:13Welcome back to my channel , friends , or

0:15if you're new , welcome . I'm Elisa , and

0:17like every Monday , I'm here with you

0:19today to tell you a True Crime story . I

0:22also remind you that the purpose of my

0:24videos and my channel is always to

0:26speak out , raise awareness , but above

0:28all , to remember the victims of these

0:29stories . Before starting with today's

0:33case , however , friends , give me just a

0:35minute to tell you about the sponsor of

0:37this video , WeRoad . I don't know about

0:40you , but this happens to me very often .

0:42I get the urge to leave . I start

0:44looking at a thousand destinations ,

0:46flights , beautiful places , and in my

0:47head , I'm already there . By now you

0:49know me ; you know how much I love to

0:51travel . But then I have to come back

0:54down to earth and face the less fun

0:55part : organizing travel , finding places

0:57to sleep , getting everyone I'm

0:59traveling with to agree . Let's say the

1:02idea of being able to skip all that

1:04doesn't bother me at all , and in fact ,

1:06it's one of the things I love most

1:08about WeRoad . You choose the trip and

1:11they take care of all the organization .

1:15You can choose from over 1,000

1:17itineraries all over the world , and the

1:19best thing is that WeRoad is a real

1:20community . You travel in small groups

1:24of people roughly the same age and with

1:26a travel mood similar to yours . Maybe

1:28you leave not knowing anyone and come

1:30back with a group of people with whom

1:31you've shared an incredible experience .

1:34So , if you too have that folder in your

1:36head full of " places I'd like to go

1:38sooner or later , " I highly recommend

1:40taking a look at their site . You can

1:44find all the available itineraries , and

1:46if it's your first trip with them , use

1:49the discount code in the description

1:51for 150 off your booking . Thanks to

1:54WeRoad for sponsoring this video , but

1:56above all , friends , thank you for your

1:58support of the channel . And now , let's

2:00begin with today's case . Yes . In the

| La situazione a New York

2:30city of New York . At a certain point ,

2:32flyers start appearing . They are

2:35attached to walls , light poles , and

2:37outside offices . On these papers , there

2:41is a huge word written in red : " WANTED .

2:45" And underneath are photos and names

2:49of healthcare executives : Thomas

2:52Halloran , Eder Cianfrocco , Andrew Witty

2:55, and then a sentence : " No healthcare

2:58CEO is safe . " There is also one with

3:02the face of Brian Thompson , but over

3:05his face is a big red X. After his

3:07murder , therefore , someone starts

3:10pointing fingers at other faces , as if

3:12to say , " You could be next . " In a short

3:17time , panic spreads within the

3:18companies , and security measures are

3:20increased . Some CEOs are taking their

3:23photos down from official websites ,

3:25while others are even hiring personal

3:28bodyguards . But at the same time ,

3:30something singular is happening .

3:33According to lawyer Joseph Seideman ,

3:35after the murder of Brian Thompson ,

3:37there is an atmosphere of fear inside

3:39UnitedHealthcare , and not only there .

3:42Some employees , he declares , are even

3:45afraid to sign the letters denying

3:48insurance coverage . No one wants to

3:52take responsibility for saying no

3:53anymore . And so , a specific question

3:56has started circulating on the web . If

4:00for a period no one wants to put their

4:03name under a denial , if this has made

4:06it harder to deny care , is it possible

4:09that Luigi Mangione saved more lives

4:12than he took ? So , this episode is part

| I tre procedimenti giudiziari

4:18two of the series on the Luigi Mangione

4:21case . If you haven't seen the first

4:24part , I suggest you do because

4:26otherwise you'll have a hard time

4:28understanding , as I won't be doing a

4:30summary and we will pick up exactly

4:32where we left off , namely that Luigi

4:35Mangione has been arrested and the

4:37charges against him are brought by

4:39three different entities , let's say .

4:43The state of Pennsylvania for firearm

4:46possession and the issue of the fake

4:48document , because he was there when he

4:51showed the fake ID to the police ; New

4:54York State regarding the murder charges

4:57; and the U.S. federal government

4:59regarding practically the same things ,

5:02charges of murder and stalking

5:04resulting in death . This means that

5:08three different trials will take place

5:10against him . This is causing a lot of

5:14debate because it is not something very

5:17common , or rather , it is true that

5:19every state has its own laws and he

5:22committed some crimes in the state of

5:24New York and others in Pennsylvania ;

5:27the fact that he crossed state lines

5:29while committing a crime , or with the

5:32intent to commit a crime , plus the

5:34terrorism charges , categorize it as a

5:36federal case . But a trial is a

5:40significant drain on resources , time ,

5:43but above all , money . Many think that

5:46it is not necessary to have three

5:49separate trials for what is essentially

5:51a single matter , especially when the

5:53New York State charges and the federal

5:56ones are so incredibly similar , as they

5:58concern the same crime . According to

6:02some , in fact , it is as if they are

6:05fighting over Luigi Mangione , as if

6:07everyone wants a piece of him , as if

6:09they have to prove something to someone

6:12. On December 19 , 2024 , Luigi is

| Tutti vogliono Luigi

6:26extradited from Pennsylvania to New

6:28York and his arrival in Manhattan is

6:31nothing short of cinematic . A " perp

6:35walk " is actually organized for him .

6:39Let me explain what that is because I

6:41only discovered its existence with this

6:43case . I had never seen one before . "

6:47Perp walk " is short for perpetrator

6:49walk , a parade for the accused , even

6:52though at this point in the story , no

6:55one has been found guilty yet .

7:00Basically , it’s a show , a show for

7:02the media and the public , where the

7:05detainee is marched out in handcuffs ,

7:08usually surrounded by armed guards , to

7:11show everyone they’ve been arrested

7:14and that justice is working . It’s a

7:18way to send a message , and yes , it is

7:20exactly as trashy as it sounds . Luigi

7:23Mangione , in fact , gets off the

7:26helicopter dressed in an orange prison

7:28jumpsuit , handcuffed and surrounded by

7:31a phalanx of armed officers . Even the

7:36mayor of New York at the time , Eric

7:38Adams , attended this parade , which is

7:40strange , because usually , mayors don't

7:43attend these things or supervise the

7:45transfer of prisoners , but Adams wanted

7:48to make an exception for Mangione , and

7:51there’s a reason for that . He says it

7:54himself in an interview with WPIX News .

8:00He says , " I wanted to look him in the

8:01eye and say , ' You committed this

8:03terrorist act in my city , the city New

8:05Yorkers love , ' and I wanted to be there

8:08to show the symbolic meaning of this

8:10gesture . " Afterward , Mayor Adams even

8:32posted images of the perp walk on his

8:35social media , writing that those who

8:38bring illegal weapons into our city

8:40will face justice . But as noted in a

8:44New York Times article , this initiative

8:47drew a lot of criticism , especially

8:49considering the fact that he himself

8:52was under federal indictment at the

8:54time and even had to appear before the

8:57same judge that Mangione later appeared

9:00before , Judge Katherine Parker , to

9:02defend himself against corruption and

9:05fraud charges . But setting that aside ,

9:10I tried looking for other photos of

9:13other perp walks , and I couldn't find a

9:16single one of this magnitude — I mean ,

9:19with all these armed guards around the

9:22perp . There’s a Reddit thread that

9:28points out how Luigi had many more

9:31armed guards around him than Timothy

9:34McVeigh , who , with his 1995 Oklahoma

9:38City bombing , took the lives of 168

9:41people , including 19 children .

9:57Regardless of everything , the perp walk

9:59is just something that , in my opinion ,

10:01is wrong for so many reasons . First of

10:03all , it’s something born in a

10:06different era , a time when the idea was

10:08to exhibit the criminal , humiliate them

10:11publicly , and show that the state was

10:14stronger . Today , however , something

10:17like this is extremely risky and

10:20prejudicial , especially because we live

10:22in a world where an image is worth more

10:25than any verdict , where a photograph

10:28circles the globe in minutes , where

10:30public perception can decide a person's

10:33fate before the trial even begins . The

10:37presumption of innocence is a legal

10:39principle . Everyone is innocent until

10:42proven guilty . But if you parade an

10:45alleged innocent person in handcuffs ,

10:47dressed as a prisoner with 800 machine

10:49guns around him , you are sending a

10:51visual message that says exactly the

10:52opposite . But all of this only

10:56strengthens the support that has now

10:59been created around Luigi Mangione .

11:13Guys , this is the craziest thing I've

11:15ever seen in my life . I know . Oh my god

11:21. These windows are so dirty . See him

11:26in the orange jumpsuit ? He's in the

11:27orange jumpsuit . Oh my god . You're

11:29doing great , baby . Oh , we love you . If

11:34I knew I would have mad I know .

11:37Seriously . Oh my god . Supporters , in

11:55fact , are growing in number and they

11:57are not just girls , as some tend to

11:59simplify , and they don't support him

12:01for aesthetic reasons . The truth , as we

12:05explained at length in the first part ,

12:08is that healthcare in the United States

12:10is a deeply felt , complex issue , loaded

12:13with frustration and anger accumulated

12:15over the years . In this context , the

12:26support arising around Mangione is not

12:29necessarily about the act he is accused

12:32of ; it is about the idea of a system

12:34perceived as unfair , about the desire

12:37for change and , obviously , the media

12:40perp walk . The mayor right there in the

12:45middle and the three different

12:47proceedings don't help , that is , they

12:49lead people to think that when the

12:52victim is a powerful billionaire ... the

12:54State's response is of a certain type ,

12:57more immediate , more visible , stronger ,

12:59and this is not fair because in the

13:02United States murders happen every day ,

13:05brutal murders , women killed by

13:07partners , people who disappear in total

13:09silence , and you rarely see a spectacle

13:13of this kind . Rarely is there a mayor

13:16walking behind the defendant . Rarely is

13:18such a powerful , symbolic image created

13:22. And it is precisely in those

13:25differences that support is born , and

13:27as I was saying , it is not necessarily

13:29support for the act , it is support for

13:31what that story represents for those

13:34who have felt ignored , crushed , for the

13:37invisibles for years . issue there are

13:57377 homicide cases that happened in New

13:59York City in 2024 and this is the only

14:02one involving the death penalty , you

14:04wait until Luigi does that in order to

14:07talk about how many people are in need

14:09and dying because of health , you wait

14:12for him . The media , let's go , tell the

14:16truth . Stop gaslighting people . We

14:19don't know what the evidence says . We

14:21don't know if he did this . Sometimes

14:23when people come out to support this ,

14:25they try to turn this misogynistically

14:27into some sort of fandom . Um , what we

14:30have here are two distinct battles , and

14:31the prosecution is trying to confuse

14:33them . The first one is the right to a

14:36fair trial , right , inalienable human

14:38rights . The second part that we're

14:39dealing with is health , and that is the

14:41right to life that we have here in

14:42America . Living in a country without

14:44public healthcare , yeah , how is it ?

14:48It's , it's horrible . I mean , like my

14:50dad still pays for my insurance .

14:53Finding care , medical care , is like

14:55impossible if you don't have good

14:57insurance . Yeah . Normal people . Other

15:15countries , United Nations . We have , we

15:21are the only highly developed nation

15:24without public health . Hear me ,

15:28Americans , what human rights are we

15:30really fighting for , and what kind of

15:32country do we want to continue to see ?

15:37Just . Accepting a government just

15:41waiting for all of us to die is not

15:43correct . Then , when the photos of

16:01Mangione's arrest are released , the

16:03situation does not improve . In the

16:07photo , in fact , you can see a large

16:09stain on his jeans as if he had

16:11urinated on himself . Supporters react

16:14immediately . According to many of them ,

16:17it is yet another demonstration of

16:19inhumane treatment towards him . As we

16:21know , Luigi suffered from spondylitis ,

16:24a back condition that can also cause

16:27incontinence problems . The comments

16:31multiply . There are those who talk

16:33about abuses of power , those who claim

16:36that in certain cases the police use

16:38humiliation as a tool of pressure

16:40during interrogations , leading people

16:42to beg to be allowed to go to the

16:44bathroom and then denying it to them .

16:47In a few hours , that image becomes yet

16:49another element around which the debate

16:51polarizes . In any case , the lawyers who

16:54will follow Luigi's trials in New York

16:56are appointed , and they are Mark and

16:58Karen Agnifilo and Jacob Kaplan . And if

17:02you think you've already heard the name

17:04Agnifilo , which I would pronounce

17:07Agnifilo , but they pronounce it

17:08Agnifilo , so I'll say it the way they

17:11say it , it's probably because you

17:13followed the P. Diddy case , because

17:15Mark Agnifilo specifically was his

17:17lawyer . An official website is also

17:21created , managed by the defense team ,

17:23where you can find updates on hearings ,

17:26documents filed in court , official

17:28press releases , and clarifications

17:30regarding the information circulating

17:33online — a sort of narrative control

17:35center — and on this site , we also find

17:38a " contribute " section . In fact , a

17:42legal fund is created where people can

17:45donate money so that Luigi can pay for

17:48his lawyers and cover the defense costs

17:51for the three ongoing proceedings . And

17:55you might say , " But why set up a fund ?

17:57Wasn't his family super wealthy ? " Well ,

| Il rapporto con la famiglia

18:02the situation regarding his family is

18:03not clear . Nothing is known , in the

18:06sense that his parents have never

18:08attended his hearings , and it is

18:10unclear if they are in contact , if they

18:13go to visit him , and consequently , if

18:15they are paying for his lawyers . The

18:19only public statement his parents

18:21released after his arrest was through

18:23their lawyer , and they stated these

18:25words . Our family is shocked and

18:28devastated by Luigi's arrest . We offer

18:31our prayers to Brian Thompson's family

18:33and ask everyone to pray for all those

18:35involved . But it doesn't matter if the

| Il supporto popolare

18:38family is paying for his lawyers or not

18:40, because do you know how much money

18:42supporters have donated to Luigi

18:44Mangione's Legal Fund ? I'll look it up

18:48live with you today , and by today , I

18:51mean the moment I am recording this

18:54part , so August 20th , if I'm not

18:57mistaken . As of today , the figure they

19:03have reached is 1,567,403 . Needless to

19:11say , in addition to receiving a lot of

19:14money , Luigi also receives many , many

19:16letters from his supporters . He

19:19receives hundreds every single day , and

19:22to ensure people know he has received

19:25them all , he keeps a kind of catalog , a

19:28binder where he basically logs every

19:31letter he receives ; that is , he writes

19:34down the zip code and the initials of

19:37the sender for each one , and he updates

19:40this catalog every so often , which can

19:42always be found in a dedicated section

19:45on his site . As of today , there are

19:50about 80 , perhaps more than 80 pages of

19:53this catalog , and each of these pages

19:55contains at least a hundred logged

19:57letters , so you do the math . Anyway ,

| Metropolitan Detention Center

20:09let's get back to our story . Luigi

20:11Mangione is in prison ; he is held at

20:14the MDC , the Metropolitan Detention

20:16Center , the prison that , by the way ,

20:19holds all the most famous criminals in

20:21the world , practically , because P.

20:23Diddy , Maduro , the former president of

20:26Venezuela , Ghislaine Maxwell are

20:28detained there , and as I told you ,

20:30Luigi has some of the best lawyers one

20:33could have . He has pleaded not guilty .

20:38So now we just have to enter the cycle

20:40of the various hearings where things

20:41will come out that were not known

20:43before . So , let's talk about the

| L’iter delle udienze

20:47federal trial , which is , let's say , the

20:49most important one , if only because

20:51it's the trial where Luigi risks the

20:53death penalty if he were to be

20:54convicted . The death penalty , in fact ,

20:58is not provided for in the New York

21:01trial nor in the Pennsylvania one ,

21:03because in both states the death

21:05penalty is not legal . At the federal

21:09level , however , the death penalty is

21:12still provided for , and that is why

21:14this proceeding is considered the most

21:17delicate and important ; in particular ,

21:20in this case against Luigi Mangione ,

21:23the death penalty was requested by the

21:25U.S. Attorney General , Pamela Bondi ,

21:28who incidentally , to date , has been

21:31fired by Trump and is no longer

21:34Attorney General due to alleged

21:36mismanagement regarding the files . The

21:40official document requesting the death

21:43penalty states that according to the

21:45United States government , the

21:47circumstances of the crime alleged in

21:49count 3 , namely murder by use of a

21:51firearm , are such that in the event of

21:53a conviction , a death sentence would be

21:56justified . And the aggravating factors

22:00of the count are also specified , which

22:02are those that would justify the death

22:05sentence . I will list them for you ,

22:07there are five . The first is grave risk

22:09of death to other persons . Mangione , in

22:12committing the crime , allegedly

22:13knowingly created a grave risk of death

22:16for one or more persons other than the

22:18victim of the crime . This means that ,

22:21having killed Brian Thompson in the

22:23middle of the street , he could have

22:24wounded other people . Two , substantial

22:27planning and premeditation . Mangione

22:30allegedly committed the crime after

22:32substantial planning and premeditation

22:34to cause the death of a person . Three .

22:37Impact on the victim . Mangione

22:39allegedly caused injury , harm , and loss

22:41to the family , friends , and colleagues

22:43of Brian Thompson . Four . Selection of

22:46the location and the victim for an act

22:48of violence . Mangione allegedly

22:51intentionally killed Brian Thompson ,

22:54CEO of a health insurance company ,

22:56while the victim was heading to an

22:59investor conference to amplify an

23:01ideological message , to maximize the

23:04visibility and impact of the victim's

23:07murder , and to provoke broad resistance

23:09to the health industry . The fifth is

23:13future danger . Mangione allegedly poses

23:17a future danger because he expressed an

23:20intention to target an entire industry

23:23and to rally political and social

23:25opposition to that industry , engaging

23:28in an act of lethal violence , taking

23:30steps to evade law enforcement , fleeing

23:33New York City immediately after the

23:35murder , and crossing state lines armed

23:38with a firearm and a privately made

23:41silencer . Now , obviously , the first

23:45thing Mangione's defense does is

23:48attempt to prevent the government from

23:51seeking the death penalty , and it does

23:54so with a very long motion filed on

23:57April 11 , 2025 , in which it first

23:59points the finger directly at U.S.

24:02Attorney General Pamela Bondi , arguing

24:05that the way the government acted , but

24:08especially communicated , compromised

24:12his right — Luigi's right — to a fair

24:15trial . The central point is this .

24:18According to the defense , Bondi turned

24:21a judicial decision into a political

24:24statement . On April 1 , 2025 , in fact ,

24:44Bondi held a press conference where she

24:47announced , in no uncertain terms , that

24:50she had ordered federal prosecutors to

24:53seek the death penalty against Mangione

24:56, stating she was doing so : " As we

24:58carry out President Trump's agenda to

25:01stop violent crime and make America

25:03safe again . " Make America safe again .

25:09The problem for the defense is that in

25:11all of her speech , a fundamental thing

25:14was never mentioned : the presumption of

25:16innocence . Mangione , at this point in

25:20the story , has not yet been convicted

25:22of anything ; he is a defendant .

25:25Technically and legally , he is innocent

25:27until proven guilty , but this is not

25:29even hinted at , and the press

25:30conference was not an isolated incident

25:33. Just shortly after , on April 6 , 2025 ,

25:37Bondi appeared on Fox News Sunday and

25:40reiterated everything , maintaining the

25:42exact same tone . She says President

25:46Trump's directive is clear : seek the

25:49death penalty whenever possible , and

25:51adds that if there have ever been death

25:54penalty cases , this is undoubtedly one

25:56of them . She also speaks of Mangione as

26:01a man who hunted down and executed a

26:03CEO , a father of two , and adds that she

26:06has received threats herself for

26:08seeking the death penalty , but assures

26:11she will not be stopped or intimidated .

26:20ever a death case . This is one this guy

26:23is charged with hunting down a CEO , a

26:26father of two , a married man , hunting

26:29him down and executing him . Yeah , I

26:33feel like these young people have lost

26:34their way . I was deaths for the death

26:38on someone who is charged with a CEO .

26:43Again , no reference to the presumption

26:46of innocence , only this very strong

26:48language that takes his guilt for

26:51granted . As if that weren't enough ,

26:54Bondi also opened an Instagram account

26:57and , in her first posts , shared a photo

26:59in front of the Department of Justice

27:01seal , writing once again what she had

27:04repeated in previous days : that the

27:06premeditated , cold-blooded murder of

27:08Brian Thompson shocked America and that

27:11, after careful evaluation , she ordered

27:13them to seek the death penalty , in line

27:15with the presidential agenda to stop

27:18violent crime . For Mangione's defense ,

27:22all of this reinforces the idea that

27:25the choice to pursue capital punishment

27:27was presented as a political move , and

27:30such a clear , public , and loaded

27:32communication obviously risks

27:34influencing any potential juror . And

27:38here , friends , the issue goes beyond

27:41Mangione's case ; the point isn't even

27:43whether Mangione is guilty or not ,

27:46because anyone could be in his place —

27:49any citizen could be . The issue , the

27:52real question for American citizens , is

27:54something else and is much bigger . If a

27:58defendant is publicly labeled guilty ,

28:00if the request for the death penalty is

28:02announced as part of a political agenda

28:05, if Mangione cannot have a fair trial ,

28:07can we really be sure that we would

28:09have one ? Luigi’s defense also

28:12insists on another point that is less

28:14high-profile , but very important . At

28:16the beginning , they say , Mangione

28:18wasn't even in the feds ' crosshairs .

28:21The proceedings started only at the

28:23state level , but then something

28:25happened . On December 19 , 2024 , the day

28:29of the famous " perp walk , " instead of

28:31being taken before the New York State

28:34Supreme Court , Luigi was taken — to the

28:36surprise of his lawyers , especially

28:38given the extremely tight timeframe —

28:41before the Federal Court . And look at

28:45that : just the day before , a federal

28:47judge had signed an indictment with

28:49four counts , including the third and

28:52fourth , which are the crucial ones that

28:54carry the death penalty as the maximum

28:56sentence . So , Mangione's defense is

29:00insinuating that the case was pushed to

29:03the federal level precisely to make the

29:05death penalty possible , because at the

29:08state level , as we’ve seen , it would

29:10never have been an option . And since

29:14the new Trump administration has openly

29:17declared that it wants to seek capital

29:19punishment whenever possible , the

29:21defense’s suspicion is this : that the

29:23move to the federal level wasn't

29:25accidental , but a way to reach a result

29:27that New York State alone could never

29:30have achieved , because , as I told you

29:32before , in New York State the death

29:34penalty doesn't exist ; it's illegal .

30:07Then the defense continues by writing

30:09that , according to the law , to justify

30:11the death penalty at the federal level ,

30:14aggravating factors must far outweigh

30:16mitigating ones , and in Mangione’s

30:18case , according to the defense , this is

30:20not the case . The only plausible

30:24aggravating factor , according to the

30:26defense , would be substantial planning

30:28and premeditation . Because the other

30:31alleged aggravating factor , that of

30:33having created a grave risk of death

30:35for other people , is described as

30:37baseless . Mangione allegedly shot at

30:41close range on a semi-deserted street

30:45and is accused of stalking only one

30:48person . On the mitigating side , however

30:51, the defense lists an absolutely

30:53positive personal background for

30:55Mangione . We talked about it in the

30:58first part : a balanced private life , an

31:00excellent academic path , etc. , and they

31:03argue that the case has nothing to do

31:05with other federal capital proceedings

31:07that involve murders committed , for

31:10example , within the scope of drug

31:12trafficking organizations , racketeering

31:14, or terrorism . On May 1st , the defense

31:18then filed a new motion asking that the

31:21murder charge filed by the state grand

31:23jury be dismissed due to double

31:25jeopardy . Double jeopardy is what we

31:29call " ne bis in idem " in Italy , a

31:31principle according to which no one can

31:34be tried twice for the same crime . As I

31:38was saying , in fact , some state and

31:40federal charges are almost identical ,

31:42and therefore two separate trials would

31:44be held . Practically for the same

31:47charges , which not only makes no sense ,

31:49but is also unconstitutional . Karen

31:52Agnifilo writes a very strong statement

31:54: she writes that in 2024 there were

31:57377 murders in New York , but only one ,

32:00that of the UnitedHealthcare CEO , has

32:03generated this tug-of-war between state

32:05and federal prosecutors who seem to be

32:08fighting over the fate of a

32:10twenty-year-old . Furthermore , the

32:14defense also asks that two other

32:16charges against Mangione be dropped ,

32:18namely those of terrorism , because to

32:21speak of terrorism , there must be an

32:23intent to intimidate the civilian

32:25population or influence government

32:27policies . And according to them , the

32:31evidence does not demonstrate this ,

32:33also because the terrorism charge

32:35exists only due to the existence of

32:37that notebook we talked about in part

32:39one , to which the name " manifesto " has

32:42been attributed . A manifesto , let's

32:45remember , is a written declaration that

32:47publicly sets out the intentions ,

32:49motives , or views of the issuer . But

32:53that notebook was found in Mangione’s

32:56backpack and was leaked illegally ; that

32:58is , Luigi did not leak it . Some police

33:02officer photographed the pages and sold

33:05the photos to the press , you see ? He

33:07did not , in fact , leak it . So , as far

33:09as we know , that notebook would have

33:11always remained private . Consequently ,

33:14one cannot speak of a manifesto , and if

33:16one cannot speak of a manifesto , one

33:19cannot speak of terrorism ; one can

33:21speak of murder . On September 16 , 2025 ,

| THE PEOPLE VS MANGIONE

33:28a state hearing takes place at the New

33:31York County Supreme Court , a very

33:33important hearing during which Judge

33:36Gregory Carro dismisses the two

33:38terrorism-related charges , deeming them

33:41legally insufficient . He explains that

33:47the evidence shows , at most , a desire

33:49to send a message against the

33:51healthcare industry , not to intimidate

33:54a population or influence the

33:56government . He even cites his writings ,

33:59the things written in that notebook

34:01where , if you remember , Mangione

34:03explicitly distinguishes himself from

34:05terrorists like the Luna Bomber .

34:08However , the other charges remain ,

34:10including second-degree intentional

34:12murder and weapons-related offenses .

34:15And the Double Jeopardy motion is also

34:18denied . You remember that rule stating

34:21you cannot be tried twice for the same

34:24act , because the defense argued that ,

34:26in essence , the state of New York and

34:29the federal government were trying

34:31Mangione for the same incident . But

34:35this is rejected because in the United

34:38States there is a principle called dual

34:41sovereignty . It means that the state

34:45and the federal government are two

34:47distinct sovereign entities . Each has

34:50its own laws , its own interests to

34:52protect , and its own authority .

34:54Therefore , if the same act violates

34:57both state and federal laws , it can be

35:00prosecuted in both systems without this

35:03being considered an illegitimate double

35:06trial . In other words , it is not the

35:09same trial twice , but two different

35:12trials before two different

35:13sovereignties . And that is why Judge

35:16Carro denies the defense's request . So

35:20there will effectively be two separate

35:22trials plus the one in Pennsylvania ,

35:24making it three . Let's talk instead

| COMMONWEALTH DELLA PENNSYLVANIA VS MANGIONE

35:29about the trial in Pennsylvania , which

35:31we haven't discussed yet , but there is

35:33a reason for that . As I was telling you

35:36, Mangione is in New York , currently

35:38detained at the MDC in Brooklyn , and

35:40the hearings for the Pennsylvania trial

35:43, for obvious reasons , take place in

35:45Pennsylvania , and Luigi Mangione wants

35:47to be physically present at these

35:50hearings , as is right . In the United

35:54States , the defendant's right to be

35:56present at their own trial and hearings

35:59is guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment ,

36:01which protects the right to a fair

36:03trial . And it is also guaranteed by the

36:07Due Process Clause of the Fifth and

36:09Fourteenth Amendments . Translated ,

36:11connecting remotely is not the same

36:14thing . Being in the courtroom means

36:16being able to speak with your lawyer

36:18without filters , observe reactions , and

36:20understand the atmosphere . In short , it

36:24is something else entirely ; otherwise ,

36:25there wouldn't be an amendment

36:27guaranteeing this right . Yet , in

36:30Mangione's case , for some reason , the

36:32federal government refused his transfer

36:35for that hearing , proposing virtual

36:37participation instead . And this creates

36:41a stalemate , because the defense

36:43maintains that physical presence is

36:44indeed a constitutional right . The

36:47government , on the other hand , says

36:48that a remote connection should be

36:50sufficient . It’s unclear why . Because

36:52, in fact , this is also

36:53unconstitutional . Regardless , as of

36:55today , this issue has not yet been

36:57resolved . Mangione continues to refuse

37:00to follow the hearings remotely . They

37:03continue to deny him the right to be

37:05transferred , so until they come to an

37:07agreement , the proceedings in

37:09Pennsylvania remain stalled and on hold

37:11. But the fact that they continue to

37:15deny his rights and treat him in an

37:17unconstitutional manner only

37:19strengthens the support network that

37:21has formed around him . But it doesn't

37:23end there . On September 23 , 2025 ,

37:26Luigi's defense filed a letter with the

37:29Court pointing out new public

37:31statements by members of the government

37:34. Specifically , on September 18 , Donald

37:38Trump stated the following on Fox News :

37:41" The fact that Mr. Mangione shot

37:43someone in the back is as clear as I am

37:46looking at you right now . " " He shot him

37:49right in the middle of the back ,

37:50killing him instantly . " And once again ,

38:03the defense returns to the same point :

38:05the presumption of innocence . When the

38:09highest political authorities speak

38:11like this about a defendant before a

38:13conviction , they are practically

38:14stripping all citizens of the right to

38:17a fair trial , not just Mangione . And as

38:20if that weren't enough , during the

38:22subsequent hearings , something comes

38:24out that truly infuriates Mangione’s

38:26supporters and others . It emerges how

| L’arresto

38:32his arrest actually unfolded , and the

38:35version that comes out in court is very

38:38different from the one told for months

38:41— the one where these almost heroic

38:43agents had stopped a dangerous

38:46terrorist — because the footage and

38:49testimony show that , once again , the

38:51police acted in a way that the defense

38:54openly defines as unconstitutional . On

38:59October 10 , 2025 , in fact , Mangione's

39:01defense formally filed a motion in

39:03court , asking the Court for a series of

39:06very serious measures . Essentially ,

39:09they argue that the arrest and the

39:11initial stages of the interrogation

39:13were handled illegitimately and ask

39:15that a fundamental portion of the

39:17evidence be excluded from the trial . In

39:21the document filed in court , the

39:22lawyers make three main requests . The

39:26first is the dismissal of two counts

39:29contained in the indictment , counts 3

39:31and 4 , which are two charges related to

39:34the use of a firearm and stalking

39:36during the alleged crimes . And the

39:40reason why the defense is asking for

39:42these two counts to be dismissed is

39:44very simple . These are the very counts

39:48that make the case eligible for the

39:51death penalty . If the judge decides to

39:55remove them from the indictment , the

39:57death penalty would automatically be

39:59off the table , and Mangione would no

40:01longer risk being sentenced to death .

40:05The second request the defense is

40:07making concerns the evidence found in

40:10Mangione’s backpack , which they claim

40:12was searched without a warrant .

40:15Therefore , they are asking to exclude

40:17this evidence for that reason . And not

40:20only was Mangione supposedly searched

40:22without a warrant , but according to

40:25this document , on the day of his arrest

40:27, he was allegedly questioned by the

40:30Altoona police without being read his

40:32rights — or rather , they were read to

40:34him after more than 20 minutes . In fact

40:38, the defense's third request is that

40:41the statements made by Mangione during

40:43those 20 minutes also be excluded from

40:46the trial . But I want to go into the

40:48details of this document and the

40:50dynamics of the arrest because it will

40:52be extremely important in the trial . So

40:55, the document describes step by step

40:57what really happened during Mangione's

40:59arrest . And at this point in the story ,

41:03this is the first time these details

41:05have been released , obviously thanks to

41:08the police bodycam footage that

41:10recorded everything . Of course , they

41:13record everything when they aren't

41:14covered or turned off for no apparent

41:16reason , but that is another matter we

41:18will get to shortly . Anyway , this is

41:20the actual sequence of events . As we

41:24already mentioned in the first part ,

41:26the Altoona police were called by the

41:28manager of the Altoona McDonald's , who

41:30reported the presence of a suspicious

41:32man who looked like the wanted suspect

41:34who shot Brian Thompson . Officers

41:37Joseph Detweiler and Tyler Fry appeared

41:40on the scene and approached Mangione ,

41:42who was sitting at a tucked-away table

41:45eating his hash browns . A table

41:48positioned against two walls . So

41:51Mangione had the table in front of him ,

41:53and then behind him and to his left , he

41:55had the wall . He had literally cornered

41:58himself . I’ll read verbatim from the

42:01document so I can't distort anything .

42:03Officers Detweiler and Fry positioned

42:05themselves to the right of Mr. Mangione

42:07, blocking his only exit from the table

42:09, given that he was already surrounded

42:11by two walls and a table . Officer

42:13Detweiler first asked Mr. Mangione to

42:15lower his mask , then asked for his name

42:17. Detweiler told him that someone had

42:19called the police because they found

42:21him suspicious . Both officers were

42:23fully armed , and their weapons were

42:25clearly visible . After asking to see

42:27identification , Mangione allegedly

42:29handed over a New Jersey driver's

42:31license in the name of Mark Rosario ,

42:33and Detweiler asked him if he was from

42:35New Jersey and if he had recently been

42:37to New York . As Mangione prepares to

42:39eat his food , Detweiler moves even

42:41closer and asks him what he was doing

42:43in New York . But before Mangione can

42:45even respond , Detweiler orders him to

42:47stand up and put his hands over his

42:49head , grabbing his right wrist and

42:50pulling him up . Detweiler asks him why

42:53he is nervous while searching him . He

42:55then orders him to sit back down at the

42:58table and tells Officer Fry to talk to

43:00Mangione , gesturing for him to move in

43:02closer to reinforce that Mangione

43:05cannot leave . But as the videos show ,

43:07Mangione is cooperative and complies

43:09with every request . While Officer Fry

43:12effectively keeps Mangione in custody

43:14by standing next to him and blocking

43:16any possible exit , Officer Detweiler

43:18goes outside to call another officer ,

43:21telling him he is 100 % sure that

43:22Mangione is the person wanted in

43:24connection with the December 4 , 2024 ,

43:27shooting in New York . Detweiler

43:30re-enters the McDonald's and continues

43:32questioning Mangione , asking him again

43:34if he is from New Jersey , what he is

43:35doing in Altoona , and if he has been in

43:37New York recently . Although Detweiler

43:41has already decided that Mangione is

43:43the New York shooting suspect , he tells

43:44Mangione , as a pretext for the police

43:46interaction , that they are there

43:48because Mangione has been at the

43:50McDonald's for 40 minutes . Fry remains

43:53in his strategic position blocking the

43:55exit , while Detweiler continues the

43:57interrogation . At 9:41 , 12 minutes

43:59after the first contact with Mangione ,

44:01Detweiler moves a backpack from the

44:03floor where Fry is blocking the passage

44:06, taking it to a spot out of Mangione's

44:08reach . Over the next minute , five more

44:11armed , uniformed officers enter the

44:13back area of the McDonald's where

44:15Mangione is now trapped . Detweiler

44:18orders another officer to position

44:20himself next to Fry , forming a kind of

44:22armed human wall that traps Mangione in

44:24the back of the restaurant . He then

44:28goes back outside to talk to other

44:29officers and confirm that Mangione

44:31matches the description of the New York

44:32suspect . When Detweiler re-enters the

44:36McDonald's at 9:45 , three officers are

44:37surrounding Mangione , and his backpack

44:39is about 2 meters away from him on a

44:41table , with two officers positioned

44:43between Mangione and the backpack . At

44:469:46 , with eight officers now present ,

44:48another officer asks Detweiler if he

44:51has read Mangione his rights , as

44:53required by the 1966 Supreme Court

44:55decision in Miranda v . Arizona . And

44:59when Detweiler replies that he has not ,

45:01the other officer tells him to inform

45:03Mangione that he is under official

45:05investigation and to read him his

45:06rights . Detweiler tells Mangione that

45:09he is under official investigation and

45:11that he will be arrested for providing

45:13false information if he provides a fake

45:15ID again . However , he does not read him

45:17his rights despite the instructions

45:20received . Detweiler then continues the

45:22interrogation without reading his

45:24rights , asking if his name is Mark

45:25Rosario . Mangione answers no . Detweiler

45:29then asks for his real name and date of

45:31birth , which Mangione provides . Another

45:33officer asks him twice why he lied

45:35about his name . Here , although it is

45:38not written in the document , it seems

45:40that Luigi answered this question by

45:42saying he clearly shouldn't have done

45:44it . Meaning , he replies something like :

45:45" I clearly shouldn't have lied . " At

45:47that point , nine officers surround

45:49Mangione and block his exit from

45:51McDonald's . At 9:48 , nearly 20 minutes

45:54after the first police contact and

45:56after numerous interrogation questions ,

45:58Officer Steven Fox finally reads

46:00Mangione his rights . After explaining

46:03his constitutional right to remain

46:05silent , Fox asks if he wants to talk to

46:07the police , but Mangione exercises his

46:09right to silence and says he does not

46:11want to speak with law enforcement . Fox

46:14tells him he is not in custody at this

46:16moment , despite there being 10 officers

46:18in the back of the McDonald's and

46:20Mangione clearly being surrounded and

46:22not free to leave . Fox then asks him

46:25why he has a false identity . Mangione

46:27does not respond . Fox orders him to

46:30stand up and put his hands against the

46:32wall to be searched , and as the videos

46:34show , Mangione obeys all directives . At

46:379:50 , about 90 seconds after telling

46:40Mangione he is not in custody , Fox

46:42handcuffs him and searches him

46:44thoroughly again . Mangione remains

46:47standing , handcuffed and surrounded by

46:49officers , while they wait for his

46:50identity to be verified . At 9:54 ,

46:53Detweiler leaves McDonald's to discuss

46:55the identification with another officer

46:57. During this conversation , he covers

47:00the bodycam with his hand for about 20

47:02seconds , preventing the camera from

47:04recording . At 9:58 , some officers begin

47:07searching Mangione's jacket and pockets

47:10again . At the same time , Officer

47:12Christi Wasser and Officer Fox begin

47:15searching the backpack that the police

47:17had moved to a table out of Mangione's

47:19reach over 17 minutes earlier . During

47:23this warrantless search , Wasser opens

47:25the backpack and fully checks all of

47:27its compartments and contents ,

47:29including closed bags inside the

47:31backpack , while Mangione is handcuffed

47:33and surrounded by officers . Fox finds a

47:36small object wrapped in cardboard and

47:39duct tape . He opens it with a knife and

47:41finds a computer chip . The officers

47:44continue the warrantless search of the

47:46backpack , even after Mangione is taken

47:48away from McDonald's and transferred to

47:49the police station . During this search ,

47:54Wasser finds a pistol magazine with

47:56rounds and , realizing the potential

47:58mistake of searching a murder suspect's

48:01backpack without a warrant , Wasser

48:03suddenly declares that she is checking

48:05it to make sure there isn't a bomb or

48:08something similar . Shortly after ,

48:11another officer says : " Now that we

48:13found this , let's take it to the

48:15station . " Wasser puts the items back in

48:17the backpack and stops the search . At

48:2010:04 AM , Wasser leaves McDonald's with

48:22the backpack . But something very

48:26important happens here , because for 11

48:29minutes there is no bodycam footage of

48:32Officer Chrissy Wasser while she drives

48:36to the police station . So the officers ,

48:40while transporting Mangione's backpack

48:42to the police station , turned off their

48:45bodycams for 11 minutes . At 10:16 AM ,

48:48one minute after arriving at the

48:50station , Wasser resumes the warrantless

48:53search of the backpack . She opens a

48:56compartment , closes it , and opens the

48:58front one as if she were looking for

48:59something specific , and finds a gun

49:01there . After finding the weapon , Wasser

49:05says again that at the McDonald's she

49:06was checking the backpack to ensure

49:08there were no bombs , but she does not

49:10explain why she didn't request a

49:11warrant once she arrived at the station

49:13. She then continues to search the

49:17backpack in the station hallway without

49:19a warrant , finding a silencer , a red

49:21notebook with personal writings , other

49:23documents , a computer chip , an iPhone ,

49:25and several USB drives . More than 7

49:29hours later , at 5:14 PM , the Altoona

49:32police finally request a search warrant

49:35. They request authorization to search

49:39and seize the same items that the

49:41police had already searched and seized

49:44that morning . So the gun , the silencer ,

49:47the notebook that was defined as a

49:50manifesto , and the other items like the

49:53USB drives and the iPhone — the

49:55contents of which are still unknown to

49:58this day — were found primarily

50:00illegally , as the result of a

50:02warrantless search , but above all , they

50:05were found after the police bodycams

50:07had been turned off . And I remind you

50:11that bodycams exist for a reason ; they

50:14serve to record interactions between

50:16police and citizens , creating video

50:18evidence of what happens during

50:20encounters . They are for transparency ,

50:23evidence collection , and accountability

50:26, so that facts can be reconstructed

50:28and disputes over what really happened

50:30can be avoided . Therefore , as is to be

50:33expected , Mangione's defense is asking

50:35to exclude from the trial the contents

50:37of the backpack found by searching it

50:39without a warrant , but especially after

50:41the cameras were , in fact , turned off

50:43for 11 minutes . Because what happened

50:46in those 11 minutes ? Who can tell us ,

50:48and how can we be sure it's the truth ?

50:52Meanwhile , while newspapers and

50:54politicians describe Mangione as a

50:56monster , a dangerous terrorist , and a

50:59cold-blooded killer , a very different

51:01image of him is emerging from inside

51:03the prison . In fact , it is reported

51:08that Mangione is a model prisoner , a

51:10point of reference for other inmates

51:13and even the guards , so much so that he

51:16earned the nickname " The Ambassador , "

51:19because , apparently , he helps new

51:21inmates when they arrive : he explains

51:24how prison life works , how to get food ,

51:27how to use the phone , and what

51:30behaviors to avoid . This brings us to

| Le ultime udienze

51:54the latest hearings we attended , which

51:57were actually suppression hearings —

52:00preliminary hearings where the judge

52:02decides whether certain evidence can be

52:05used in the trial or not . So , in this

52:10hearing , they are theoretically

52:13supposed to decide the start date of

52:16the trial and discuss ... ... basically

52:21excluding or dismissing two charges

52:23against Mangione , count 3 and count 4 .

52:26The defense will have 30 minutes , and

52:28the prosecution will have 30 minutes .

52:30This is a federal hearing for the

52:31federal trial , which therefore includes

52:32the possibility of the death penalty .

52:34So , the death penalty is still on the

52:35table .

52:37Yes , the death penalty is still on the

52:38table , and that is why they are trying

52:40to dismiss these charges . They let in a

52:43group of the public , some supporters .

52:47Press access is separate ; there is a

52:50separate hallway . We arrived early ,

52:52registered at 7:00 AM , and now , at

52:5410:30 AM , we will go in ourselves .

52:57The first hearing we attended was on

52:59January 9 , 2026 , and it concerned the

53:02famous illegally searched backpack .

53:09During the hearing , Luigi's defense

53:11explains to Judge Margaret Garnett that

53:14the backpack and consequently its

53:16contents , as we mentioned before ,

53:19should not be admitted as evidence at

53:21trial . Remember , these are preliminary

53:25hearings ; the trial has not started yet

53:27because , specifically , it was seized

53:29and searched illegally . However , the

53:33judge reasons with them and says that

53:35it is normal that they took and

53:37searched the backpack , because what

53:39were they supposed to do ? Leave it

53:41there ? I mean , Mangione was alone ,

53:43there was no one else to leave this

53:45backpack with . The backpack was his ; he

53:47was asked about it . And from the moment

53:50he was placed under arrest , it is

53:52normal that the backpack was also

53:54recovered and searched by the officers .

53:57There is a bit of back-and-forth

53:59between the defense and the judge on

54:01this point , but no real decision is

54:03reached . In fact , the defense proposes

54:07setting a hearing dedicated exclusively

54:09to the backpack issue , and at that

54:11moment , Judge Garnet doesn't say yes or

54:13no , but reserves the right to think

54:15about it . Then we move on to the famous

54:19charges 3 and 4 , the ones that bring

54:22the case under capital punishment ,

54:24which the defense asked to have

54:26dismissed . From here , the hearing

54:30becomes very , very technical because

54:32you should know that in American trials

54:35, there's this practice of continually

54:38citing past cases similar to the one

54:41being discussed . In the United States .

54:43Indeed , the legal system functions

54:45largely through so-called precedents .

54:48In practice , they look at decisions

54:50made in similar cases in previous years

54:52to understand how the law should be

54:54interpreted in the current case as well

54:56. That is , past rulings become binding

55:00for cases of the present and the future

55:02. So , if in similar past cases that

55:05specific charge was not brought or the

55:08death penalty was not deemed applicable

55:10, then it becomes much harder to argue

55:13that it should be in the Mangione case .

55:17So for hours , let's say the defense and

55:19the prosecution went back and forth

55:21with the judge , citing various past

55:23cases and various past rulings . And it

55:27was obviously all very technical and

55:29difficult to follow , not just for me ,

55:31but actually also for many journalists

55:33present whom I chatted with in the

55:35bathroom after the hearing . But

55:38surprisingly , a few days later , Judge

55:40Garnet agrees to add an extra hearing

55:43to discuss the backpack issue . Do you

55:46remember ? She had said : " I'll think

55:47about it " and . Then , a few days later ,

55:50she decided yes , and decided to call an

55:52Altuna police officer to testify ,

55:55almost in the capacity of a consultant :

55:57that is , an officer from that police

56:00department , but obviously unrelated to

56:02the case and not present on the day of

56:05Mangione's arrest to avoid conflicts of

56:07interest , who can explain in detail the

56:10correct procedures to follow during an

56:12arrest , so as to determine once and for

56:16all whether the officers behaved

56:18according to the rules that day or not .

56:22So , it's 0 ° C , feels like -8 ° C .

56:27This morning we went to register to be

56:29able to enter the courtroom , and there

56:32was actually no one outside , whereas

56:34last time on the 9th , when it was

56:36definitely warmer , there was already a

56:39line of people who had slept there in

56:41front . I passed by last night and there

56:44was no one there anyway , because the

56:46temperature this morning was 8 , feels

56:47like , last night it was minus 11 . It

56:52was truly impossible to think about

56:53spending the night out there with the

56:55cold there was .

56:59This hearing takes place on January 23 ,

57:012026 . We also attended this one , and

57:05Officer Nathan Snyder , deputy chief of

57:07the Altuna police , is called to the

57:09stand to testify . His task is precisely

57:13, uh , to explain to the Court what the

57:16standard police procedures are when an

57:18arrest is made , particularly when a

57:21suspect has personal items with them ,

57:23as in the case of Mangione and his

57:25backpack . Snyider , uh , then describes

57:28the rules that officers should , in

57:31theory , follow . An arrested person's

57:34belongings must be secured , cataloged ,

57:37and registered , and in many cases , they

57:39cannot be searched in detail without a

57:42warrant , unless there are immediate

57:44security concerns . And it is precisely

57:48on this point that the defense focuses ,

57:50because according to them , what

57:52happened with Mangione's backpack did

57:54not follow these procedures . The

57:56hearing , however , concludes after a

57:58couple of hours , and obviously , the

58:00judge makes no decision right then and

58:02there . The last federal hearing is held

58:07on January 30th , the most important one

58:09. In fact , we extended our stay in New

58:12York just to be able to attend . So , the

58:16hearing starts at 11:00 in the morning ,

58:18okay ? But we head over around 7:30 to

58:21get on the , uh , press list to secure a

58:24decent seat in the courtroom . And

58:27around 9:00 in the morning , while we

58:30are still waiting there , I get a

58:32notification because I have alerts set

58:35for the Mangione case . Judge Margaret

58:39Garnett has just filed a document , a

58:42document announcing that she has

58:44officially dismissed counts 3 and 4

58:47against Luigi Mangione , and this means

58:50something very simple . The death

58:54penalty in the federal trial is

58:55officially off the table , but she made

58:57this decision and filed the document

58:59before the start of the hearing , like 2

59:01hours earlier . When we arrive at the

59:04courthouse , in fact , the atmosphere is

59:06very tense . By the way , we went through

59:09security to enter the courthouse

59:11alongside Karen Agnifilo and Mangione's

59:14entire defense team , who , while waiting

59:16in line , shared that they also received

59:18the judge's notification while they

59:21were on their way to court — meaning

59:23not even they knew anything . And while

59:27we were talking about this , we hear

59:30Mangione's supporters cheering at the

59:32news . But only for a second . And one

59:36thing I noticed is that they are keen

59:38on being very respectful precisely

59:40because they want to be taken seriously

59:42, so they cheer in unison for a second

59:44inside the courthouse and then that's

59:46it , silence returns . The hearing begins

59:50at 11:00 , and Luigi Mangione is always

59:52very calm in every hearing . These are

59:56federal hearings , so cameras are not

59:57permitted . There are no photos of him

1:00:00in these hearings , but his demeanor is

1:00:03calm ; he is very serious , attentive ,

1:00:05sometimes takes notes , and is serious

1:00:07even in this specific hearing , despite

1:00:09the fact that there is great news for

1:00:12him , because he no longer faces the

1:00:14death penalty , but he never loses his

1:00:16composure . The judge , during the

1:00:19hearing , reiterates her decision .

1:00:22Counts 3 and 4 against Mangione have

1:00:24been dismissed , so unless the

1:00:26prosecution files an appeal regarding

1:00:29this decision , this is no longer a

1:00:31capital case . To date , the prosecution

1:00:34has not appealed , so it is official

1:00:36that Mangione no longer faces the death

1:00:38penalty ; even if he were to be

1:00:39convicted , the death penalty is simply

1:00:41no longer on the table . The judge also

1:00:44announces her decision regarding the

1:00:46backpack . On this point , she

1:00:49establishes that the backpack and all

1:00:51its contents will be admitted as

1:00:54evidence in the trial , and finally , she

1:00:56also sets possible dates for the start

1:00:59of the trial . Now that the death

1:01:01penalty is off the table , the entire

1:01:03process becomes much faster because

1:01:05capital trials are much more complex

1:01:06and require months of additional

1:01:08preparation . Judge Garnett therefore

1:01:10sets a schedule . Jury selection will

1:01:13begin on September 8 , 2026 , while

1:01:15opening arguments for the trial are

1:01:18scheduled for October 13 , 2026 . There

1:01:22is just one problem , because as soon as

1:01:24Judge Garnett sets these dates for the

1:01:26federal trial , the State of New York

1:01:28intervenes and says , " Wait a minute ,

1:01:30wait a minute , we were here first . "

1:01:35According to state prosecutors , in fact

1:01:37, the state trial must take place

1:01:39before the federal one , remaining

1:01:41perfectly in line with the feeling we

1:01:44have had for months , which is that the

1:01:46two prosecutors are arguing over this

1:01:48case a bit like it were a toy .

1:01:53Initially , Judge Carro , the judge for

1:01:55the state trial , had decided that the

1:01:57state proceedings would begin on June 8

1:02:00, 2026 ; but for Mangione's defense , it

1:02:02would have been humanly impossible to

1:02:05prepare for this trial , the state one ,

1:02:07and then the federal one only a few

1:02:09months later : the state one in June and

1:02:12the federal one in September . So Judge

1:02:16Carro decided on a new schedule . The

1:02:20state trial , or rather , jury selection

1:02:22for the state trial , will begin on

1:02:25September 8 , 2026 , and during this

1:02:27hearing , the one in which Judge Carro

1:02:29established that the state trial will

1:02:32begin in September , Luigi Mangione

1:02:34spoke before being taken out of the

1:02:36courtroom ; he said : " It's the same

1:02:39trial twice , 1 + 1 equals 2 , and double

1:02:41jeopardy by any definition of common

1:02:44sense . " You always remember this double

1:02:48jeopardy , the principle that you cannot

1:02:50be tried twice for the same crime . Then

1:03:08, on May 18 , Judge Carro decided which

1:03:11evidence will be admitted at the state

1:03:14trial : the gun , the famous notebook ,

1:03:17and other items found inside the

1:03:19backpack after Luigi's arrest ; but he

1:03:22excludes from the trial all items found

1:03:25before Luigi was taken away , namely the

1:03:28gun magazine , the cell phone , the

1:03:31passport , and the wallet . Then , in June

1:03:36of this year , 2026 , something bizarre

1:03:40happened that no one really understood :

1:03:43Judge Carro declared that Mangione

1:03:46intends to present a psychiatric

1:03:49defense in the state trial , meaning his

1:03:52lawyers will use the defense that he

1:03:56acted under extreme emotional

1:03:58disturbance at the time of the crime .

1:04:04Too bad that just the next day his

1:04:06lawyers backtracked and informed the

1:04:08same judge that no , they had changed

1:04:10their minds . Mangione does not intend

1:04:13to pursue a psychiatric defense .

1:04:16People's reactions to this somewhat

1:04:18confusing change of direction are

1:04:20equally confused . People do not

1:04:23understand what is happening . On forums

1:04:26like Reddit , people are exchanging

1:04:28opinions on the matter . They wonder why

1:04:31they wanted a psychiatric defense ,

1:04:34since that would still mean assuming

1:04:36Luigi committed the act , essentially an

1:04:39admission of guilt , while he has

1:04:42pleaded not guilty . Many speculate that

1:04:46the defense wants to try to obtain a

1:04:49lighter sentence , such as manslaughter

1:04:51instead of murder , but many are

1:04:53reflecting on something that will be

1:04:55useful shortly , so follow me . Many

1:04:59wonder , if you build a defense in the

1:05:02state trial that basically starts from

1:05:04the assumption that Luigi killed

1:05:07Thomson , what consequences could this

1:05:09have in the federal proceeding and vice

1:05:12versa ; I mean , he has to face two

1:05:15trials with more or less the same

1:05:17charges , right ? But if in one he

1:05:20defends himself by basically saying yes

1:05:23, I did it because I was extremely

1:05:24disturbed , then won't that be used

1:05:26against him in the other trial ? And

1:05:30this is not just paranoia born on

1:05:33Reddit , because Karen Agnifilo herself ,

1:05:36Luigi's lawyer , later raised this issue

1:05:38in court , arguing that making materials

1:05:41related to a possible psychiatric

1:05:44defense public could prejudice Luigi in

1:05:47the other federal trial . In any case ,

1:05:51when the defense suddenly backtracked

1:05:53the following day and announced that ,

1:05:55precisely , they will no longer use this

1:05:58strategy , people inevitably all ask

1:06:00themselves the same question . What

1:06:03happened in those 24 hours ? Did the

1:06:06lawyers change their minds ? Did Luigi

1:06:07change his mind ? Did they face pressure

1:06:10from somewhere ? We don't know . But the

1:06:13real plot twist , friends , happens on

1:06:15August 14th . Essentially , on August

| I shot Mr. Thompson

1:06:2212th , Luigi's defense and the federal

1:06:25prosecution jointly filed a rather

1:06:27unusual , and above all , sudden request .

1:06:32They asked Judge Margaret Garnett , the

1:06:35federal trial judge , to schedule a new

1:06:37hearing just two days later , on August

1:06:4014th at 11:00 a.m. They did not

1:06:42publicly explain the reason nor why the

1:06:45request came with such short notice .

1:06:49Obviously , speculation immediately

1:06:52began regarding a possible deal , a plea

1:06:55bargain , and especially a change in

1:06:59Luigi's plea . And indeed , friends , on

1:07:06August 14th Luigi Mangione enters that

1:07:09courtroom and does something he had

1:07:11never done until that moment . He pleads

1:07:15guilty to both federal counts of

1:07:18stalking . At the federal level , he was

1:07:22charged with two counts of stalking

1:07:24resulting in the death of Brian

1:07:26Thompson , but above all , before the

1:07:28judge , he explicitly admits that he was

1:07:31the one who killed him . I will read his

1:07:34exact words to you because , since it is

1:07:36a federal hearing , no videos exist as

1:07:38cameras are not allowed in the

1:07:39courtroom . Luigi asks to remain seated

1:07:43and says these words . After years spent

1:07:47enduring severe pain caused by a back

1:07:49problem , dealing with the obstacles of

1:07:51the health insurance system , and

1:07:54witnessing the similar experiences of

1:07:56countless other people , I discovered

1:07:58that UnitedHealthcare would hold its

1:08:01annual investor conference in New York

1:08:03on December 4 , 2024 , although the

1:08:05precise location had not been made

1:08:07public . I then did some research online

1:08:11about the event . I noticed that the

1:08:14annual conference of the largest

1:08:15American healthcare organization , whose

1:08:18stated mission is to make the

1:08:19healthcare system work better for

1:08:21everyone , would be attended by company

1:08:23executives , the board of directors , and

1:08:25hundreds of investors , not doctors ,

1:08:27nurses , and patients . In November 2024 ,

1:08:31I arrived in Manhattan from outside New

1:08:33York state . I then sent an email to

1:08:37UnitedHealth executives , posing as an

1:08:39investor from a firm managing over 50

1:08:41billion dollars in assets , and asking

1:08:43for information about the conference .

1:08:47Unlike my previous interactions with

1:08:49insurance companies , I received an

1:08:50immediate response within an hour .

1:08:54Before traveling to New York , I used a

1:08:563D printer to make a part for a gun and

1:08:58equipped the weapon with a silencer and

1:09:00a magazine . I traveled to New York and

1:09:04sent that email to UnitedHealthcare

1:09:06with the intention of shooting Brian

1:09:07Thompson . On the morning of December 4 ,

1:09:112024 , I shot Mr. Thompson in Manhattan ,

1:09:14and he died . In doing so , I was aware

1:09:17that my actions would cause him to fear

1:09:20for his life or suffer serious physical

1:09:22injury . I knew what I was doing was

1:09:25illegal . And then the judge asks him : "

1:09:29Mr. Mangione , how do you plead now to

1:09:31counts one and two of the indictment ? "

1:09:34And he answers : " Guilty . " The judge

1:09:38then informs him that the sentence for

1:09:40this type of crime starts at 292 months

1:09:42, or 24 years and 4 months , and

1:09:44declares she will issue the sentence on

1:09:47December 18th . Luigi Mangione therefore

1:09:51pleads guilty to federal charges of

1:09:54stalking resulting in death . People's

1:09:57reactions are mixed because his

1:10:00confession doesn't end the polarization

1:10:03that has always surrounded him . Some

1:10:07simply see it as the definitive

1:10:10confirmation of his guilt . For others ,

1:10:14it's a desperate or extremely

1:10:16calculated courtroom scene ; but there

1:10:18are those who , even with Luigi

1:10:21explaining in his own words that he

1:10:23planned and committed the murder ,

1:10:25continue to claim he's innocent :

1:10:27arguing he confessed only as part of a

1:10:30strategic move we don't yet know , or

1:10:33worse , because he was forced by

1:10:35pressure from above , political pressure

1:10:37. We've seen how this case has also

1:10:40become a political matter . Hard to like

1:11:04it . First of all , no remorse whatsoever

1:11:07. You know , I'm a human . I'm empathetic

1:11:09. I feel really bad that somebody has

1:11:12to really feel bad for the Thomson

1:11:13family . Um , but you know , it's just

1:11:16unfortunate that , you know , Bri Thomson

1:11:18a system in place and you know , we just

1:11:20need a better system . Do you feel like

1:11:24Bri Thomson's life was the for better

1:11:26use of words like this whole thing come

1:11:29out of it like this the protesting and

1:11:31all that against the health system ? Do

1:11:34you think his life was worth that ? Um

1:11:36in a way it's really unfortunate that

1:11:38someone had to die to spark the

1:11:39conversations that we're now having but

1:11:41unfortunately that's the way it is . His

1:11:44death resulted in us having these tough

1:11:46conversations about health inequality

1:11:48and people suffering in Amer . You feel

1:11:51like it was worth it on that sense ? Not

1:11:53necessarily worth it , but I can

1:11:54understand like the effects that have

1:11:56come from it . But we live in a civil

1:11:58society governed by the rule of law . We

1:12:02debate , we disagree , we protest murder .

| La pistola

1:12:19I read a comment , right under my own

1:12:22post on the topic , in which this person

1:12:24wrote that it's impossible for Luigi to

1:12:27have created the gun with a 3D printer ,

1:12:30because the 3D printer , or at least the

1:12:32software for designing objects to print

1:12:35, has security blocks that prevent the

1:12:37creation of dangerous items , such as

1:12:40weapons . And I'll take this opportunity

1:12:43to explain something I found

1:12:45interesting . The Wired Investigation

1:12:49YouTube channel created the exact same

1:12:52weapon in the exact same way Luigi did .

1:12:56In fact , Luigi didn't print the whole

1:12:58weapon , he says so himself . I printed

1:13:00part of the weapon . He only printed a

1:13:03part , or rather two , because he also

1:13:05printed the silencer . The silencer and

1:13:08then the frame , which is the grip

1:13:11structure , the very part , by the way ,

1:13:13that normally allows for the legal

1:13:16identification of a weapon through the

1:13:19serial number ; so , by 3D printing it ,

1:13:21the gun cannot be traced via a standard

1:13:24serial number . The other parts , all the

1:13:28mechanisms and so on , he simply ordered

1:13:31online from various sites that sell

1:13:33them as spare parts and then assembled

1:13:35everything together . In fact , a gun

1:13:39assembled this way functions

1:13:41differently from a normal weapon . A

1:13:45weapon assembled this way , especially

1:13:48with the silencer , jams . Indeed , if you

1:13:51recall in the video of the Brian

1:13:53Thompson murder , the attacker , whom we

1:13:56now know to be Luigi Mangione , has his

1:13:58gun jam the first time he fires , and he

1:14:00makes a very specific movement with his

1:14:03hands to make it work . It's as if he

1:14:05were giving it a boost , I don't know

1:14:07how else to explain it to you . Well , in

1:14:09the video I mentioned earlier by Wired

1:14:11Investigation , the exact same thing

1:14:12happens to him . The gun jams in the

1:14:16exact same way and it needs to be used ,

1:14:19let's say , in a particular way , exactly

1:14:21as Luigi does in that video ; which

1:14:24would also demonstrate that in order to

1:14:26use it , to still fire five shots in a

1:14:29row after the first jam , he must have

1:14:31trained , he must have practiced a lot ,

1:14:34he must have greatly premeditated this

1:14:36crime . In any case , returning to

| Double Jeopardy

1:14:43Luigi's confession , after the hearing

1:14:44ended , his lawyer Karen Agnifilo issued

1:14:46a statement outside the courthouse . I

1:14:49will quote her exact words . Today is a

1:14:52solemn and important day . With

1:14:54today’s guilty plea , Mr. Mangione has

1:14:56taken full responsibility for the death

1:14:58of Brian Thompson . It was a single

1:15:02tragic event , yet he is being tried

1:15:05twice for the same conduct . As Luigi

1:15:09explained in court today , for years he

1:15:11suffered from severe and debilitating

1:15:14pain following a back problem , while

1:15:16trying to navigate our healthcare and

1:15:18health insurance system . Like the

1:15:22thousands of people who contacted us

1:15:24after this tragedy to share their own

1:15:26experiences , he too felt that the

1:15:28system had abandoned him and destroyed

1:15:30his life . Even though this was a single

1:15:33, isolated incident , Mr. Mangione has

1:15:36been treated unfairly from the

1:15:37beginning in every respect . He managed

1:15:41to get the terrorism charges dropped

1:15:43and avoid the death penalty , while at

1:15:45the same time finding himself facing

1:15:47two parallel proceedings in two

1:15:49different jurisdictions that are trying

1:15:51to punish him twice for exactly the

1:15:53same conduct . He has been treated

1:15:56differently than any other defendant

1:15:58accused of this crime in the state of

1:15:59New York . Fortunately , however , New

1:16:02York law does not allow this . New York

1:16:06law does not permit a person to be

1:16:08tried and punished twice for the exact

1:16:10same crime under a rule governing

1:16:12successive prosecutions , also known as

1:16:14the Double Jeopardy law . Today's guilty

1:16:18plea triggers the application of this

1:16:21rule , and we have just filed a motion

1:16:23in State Court explaining why the state

1:16:26charges must be dismissed by virtue of

1:16:28the protections provided by the State

1:16:30of New York against Double Jeopardy .

1:16:34Here we are . So Luigi Mangione pleaded

1:16:37guilty in federal court to get the

1:16:40state charges dropped , avoid the state

1:16:42trial , and therefore be convicted only ,

1:16:45in quotes , of stalking resulting in

1:16:48death . So there is no plea deal as was

1:16:52initially thought . This is a strategy ,

1:16:56but a very risky strategy , friends ,

1:16:58because do you remember when Karen

1:17:01herself said that revealing their state

1:17:04defense strategy publicly could have

1:17:06compromised Mangione's federal trial ?

1:17:10Well , now she is doing practically the

1:17:12same thing herself . Mangione is charged

1:17:15federally with stalking resulting in

1:17:17death , so not with murder . In state

1:17:20court , he is charged with murder . The

1:17:23problem is that by pleading guilty to

1:17:25the stalking charges , he has

1:17:27essentially confessed to the murder ;

1:17:29that is , he didn't say , " Yes , I

1:17:31followed Mr. Thompson , I sought out the

1:17:33conference , I posed as an investor , but

1:17:35then I did nothing . " He said , " I went

1:17:38there , I shot him , I knew he would fear

1:17:41for his life , I was conscious of what I

1:17:43was doing . " So , if Judge Carro , the

1:17:47state judge , does not agree to drop the

1:17:49charges , if he does not believe the

1:17:51case falls under Double Jeopardy law ,

1:17:54not only will Luigi go to trial , but

1:17:56his confession will , in all likelihood ,

1:17:59be used against him in that trial ,

1:18:01because he has already confessed to

1:18:03what he is accused of in a trial that

1:18:06has yet to take place ; but , in reality ,

1:18:08it might not be that way . Or rather ,

1:18:13according to Niama Ramani , who is an

1:18:15attorney and former American federal

1:18:17prosecutor , this strategy might not

1:18:20actually be a winning one . Moreover ,

1:18:24according to him , Luigi's defense has

1:18:26completely cornered the federal

1:18:28prosecutors . Rami literally says the

1:18:31defense set a trap for the feds and

1:18:34they fell for it hook , line , and sinker

1:18:36. And he goes as far as to say this

1:18:40could go down as one of the

1:18:41worst-handled federal prosecutions in

1:18:43American history , because normally in

1:18:45the U.S. there is nothing stopping the

1:18:48state and the federal government from

1:18:50trying someone separately for the same

1:18:52facts . I explained this to you in this

1:18:55very video , right ? There is this dual

1:18:57sovereignty that allows exactly that .

1:19:00But New York State is different ; it

1:19:03works differently because it has a

1:19:05state law that prevents a second

1:19:08prosecution in the state for the same

1:19:11criminal episode . And so , this is the

1:19:13point . The federal stalking charge

1:19:15Luigi just pleaded guilty to is part of

1:19:18the same criminal episode as the murder

1:19:20charge brought by New York State . So

1:19:23those state charges , now that the

1:19:25federal case has concluded because he

1:19:28pleaded guilty , must be dismissed .

1:19:32According to Rami , the feds ' mistake

1:19:34was letting the federal proceeding

1:19:36reach a guilty plea first , because , as

1:19:39he explains , if the state had gone

1:19:41first and then the feds , this double

1:19:43jeopardy problem wouldn't have existed .

1:19:48By letting the federal proceeding go

1:19:50first , they essentially created the

1:19:53problem the defense is now using to try

1:19:56and throw out the murder trial .

1:19:59Obviously , the murder charges are more

1:20:01serious than the stalking charges . And

1:20:03Rami also adds something important .

1:20:06Even if Judge Carro were to reject this

1:20:09motion and the trial were to go ahead

1:20:11anyway , the problem has now been

1:20:14created because if Luigi were convicted

1:20:17, the double jeopardy issue could be

1:20:19raised again on appeal . Anyway , I'm

1:20:23recording this video on August 20th , I

1:20:25think it's the 20th or the — ah no ,

1:20:27it's the 21st . Earlier I said the 20th .

1:20:29It's August 21 , 2026 , and as of today ,

1:20:32this is the information we have . A few

1:20:34days ago , Judge Carro announced he will

1:20:37respond to the defense's motion by

1:20:40October 9th regarding the request to

1:20:43dismiss the charges due to double

1:20:45jeopardy and . Defense attorneys will

1:20:48have until October 30th to respond in

1:20:50turn , and as things stand , the next

1:20:53hearing is set for December 10th ; so he

1:20:56pushed back the hearing , which was

1:20:58scheduled for September 8th , by two

1:21:01months . Today , friends . This is all the

1:21:04information I had on this case .

1:21:07Obviously , new information comes out at

1:21:08any moment , so if there are any updates

1:21:10, I will keep you posted as always . If

1:21:13this trial happens , I will go , we will

1:21:15go . There is no way , apparently , that I

1:21:20can go to New York in months that

1:21:22aren't the coldest in the world , but

1:21:24that's fine . That said , friends , I

1:21:28thank you for spending all this time

1:21:30with me again today and I'll see you in

1:21:32the next video . Bye

More from Elisa True Crime

Recently added transcripts

Browse the whole transcript library

This transcript was generated from the captions YouTube publishes for this video. Get the transcript of any YouTube video atfreeyoutubetranscribe.com, free, unlimited, no sign-up.