Free YouTube Transcribe

Video transcript

Europe's Best Intentions Have Backfired Dangerously | Eva Vlaardingerbroek

The Rubin Report · 13,026 words · 60 min read

Want to search this transcript, jump the video from any line, or download it as TXT, SRT, or VTT?

Open in the transcript tool

Full transcript

0:00Ladies and gentlemen, Mr. Dave Rubin and

0:01Miss Eva Fladingabrooke.

0:04>> [applause]

0:21>> Um

0:22So, Eva, you've achieved a distinction

0:24that even the IRGC hasn't yet managed in

0:26Britain. You've been prescribed.

0:28You may no longer enter the United

0:30Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern

0:32Ireland. Why?

0:34Yeah, that's correct. Well, the official

0:36reason that I've been given is that I'm,

0:39quote, not conducive to the public good.

0:42>> [laughter]

0:43>> Unquote.

0:45Uh that is also the only reason that

0:47I've been given. Cuz for those of you

0:49who don't know, I received an email a

0:53couple of Now Now two months ago or so,

0:55out of the blue, from the United Kingdom

0:58government saying that I was no longer

1:00welcome in the UK and that they had

1:02revoked my ETA. So, obviously now as

1:04Europeans, we need an ETA, similar to an

1:06ESTA, you know, for the US, to go to the

1:09UK. And I had gone to the UK in

1:11September to attend the Unite the

1:14Kingdom rally where I spoke

1:16predominantly about remigration.

1:19And now we we all know the stories of

1:21people getting arrested in the UK. Thank

1:24God that didn't happen to me. Um but

1:26obviously what they could do, and they

1:28did it now, is revoke my um travel

1:31authorization.

1:33And uh this happened 3 days after I

1:36criticized Keir Starmer on X.

1:40And that ironically, I criticized him

1:42about the attacks on freedom of speech

1:45in the UK. Um and specifically

1:48criticized him for allowing the ongoing

1:50rape of British girls um and not doing

1:53anything about these these migrant rape

1:56gangs.

1:57And so

1:583 days later, I received that email. And

2:00it was just a couple of lines saying,

2:02not conducive to the public good, bye.

2:04You don't have the right to appeal. And

2:06that was it.

2:08We mentioned uh while discussing things

2:10before the uh uh the outset of this

2:12event, Dave, that you too fear that you

2:15could be arrested should you go to

2:16Britain. Um why do you think that would

2:19be?

2:20Well, I must say I'm wondering what I'm

2:22doing wrong that I haven't been banned

2:24yet. Um

2:25every time I go, I mean, I'm not

2:27kidding. It It sort of sounds funny, I

2:29suppose, but every time I go when I hand

2:30my

2:32I think, boy, is is this the last time

2:34I'm going to go there? And actually, the

2:35last time that I saw Eva was at Jordan

2:38Peterson's art conference in February of

2:392025. And I had dinner with about 10 of

2:43the panelists, many of whom you know are

2:45are well-known American Some American

2:47and some British speakers whose names

2:50not be mentioned at the moment, but we

2:51sat at a dinner

2:53all talking about the fact that for the

2:56first time in our lives, we were

2:57somewhere where there was some concern

3:00about what we might tweet. Uh you know,

3:02I wanted to tweet about what I saw on

3:05the streets. This was, you know, a year

3:07after October 7th or so. And you know,

3:09there were I called them Hamas rallies.

3:11They were all over Britain. I did not

3:13feel safe on the street. I had armed

3:15security with me the entire time. Uh and

3:18I wanted to tweet about that. And I

3:19thought, I also want to get out of this

3:22country without an international

3:23incident. And I wasn't the only person

3:25uh that felt that. And these are highly

3:28influential people who are accustomed

3:30them to saying whatever they want and

3:31taking the the slings and arrows for it.

3:34So, uh I suspect Well, look, first off,

3:38with all of the problems that the UK

3:40has, if this is your number one problem,

3:43um then, you know, their their math

3:46equation is is slightly off. I That's

3:49number one. Um but also

3:52uh

3:53silencing people from being able to say

3:56things, in most cases, which are true or

3:59vitally important to say,

4:02is the point of what J.D. Vance said

4:05when he gave that important speech. You

4:07will ultimately upend everything else.

4:10And that really is what could take down

4:12Europe. I don't think it's going to be a

4:13military takedown. It could just be a

4:15slow rotting from the inside. So, it's

4:18it That's one of the reasons why uh this

4:20is my third year here in Hungary. And I

4:22love everyone here at the Danube

4:23Institute. And I'm and CPAC. Yeah.

4:27>> [applause]

4:29>> And and I genuinely mean that. I I

4:30travel all over the world. I go to all

4:32different countries and cities where you

4:34can just see that so many things are

4:36wrong across the West. You all know

4:37that. And it's not here. And uh you

4:40know, I know there's an election in a

4:41few weeks. And you know, hopefully it

4:43will it will go okay. But you know, one

4:45of the functions of success uh is that

4:48you you don't realize how good you have

4:49it. And um

4:51we'll we'll see what the future is here.

4:53But but we must just keep saying what we

4:55think. Otherwise Otherwise the rest is

4:57is gone already.

4:59Would you extend that right to say the

5:03unsayable and to uh protest your belief

5:06in public too? For instance, what we saw

5:08the other day in Trafalgar Square where

5:10you had thousands of Muslims engaged in

5:12an act of public prayer, which by its

5:13very nature is one calling for the

5:16downfall of Christianity.

5:18All right. So, well, there's a couple of

5:19things here. You know, there's a there's

5:21a fundamental difference between saying

5:24what you want to say as a

5:27private person and constantly as a group

5:30of people taking over the public uh

5:34the public utilities. And taking, you

5:36know, we see this now in Times Square in

5:38New York City praying in the middle of

5:40the street. You know, at some point, if

5:43you do not There's a difference between

5:45saying something. You want to pray,

5:46that's fine. You want to have your

5:47mosque, that's fine. You want to wander

5:48down the street and mutter whatever you

5:50want, that's fine, too. There's

5:52something else that is being weaponized

5:54against us in the West, which is that

5:56they are now coming to take over all of

5:58our public spaces. And we're going to

6:01have to grapple with that because I

6:03Look, I'm an American and I have the the

6:05most liberal, in the right sense of the

6:07word liberal, uh

6:09uh interpretation of free speech. People

6:11should be allowed to pray. They should

6:12be allowed to say whatever they want.

6:14There's very slim exceptions to direct

6:16calls for violence. And then from an

6:17American perspective, libel and slander,

6:19which are laws that are almost never

6:20used, which I think is good. Um but

6:24especially in the last 2 years, as we've

6:26seen mass movements of people who just

6:28take over Fifth Avenue or take over

6:30Trafalgar Square or take over every

6:33public park, at some point, that is

6:36stopping other people from their right

6:38to assembly. It's a stopping other

6:40people from their right to speak

6:42themselves. Um and and we're going to

6:45have to grapple with that. That in some

6:47sense is more of a right to assembly

6:48issue than a than a right to free speech

6:50issue. Eva, Istvan mentioned Isabel

6:54Vaughan Spruce, who was arrested many

6:55times for her silent prayer in Britain.

6:58It does seem to me uh I mean, you and I

7:00are both Catholics, so perhaps we have a

7:02particularly partial view on this. But

7:03it does seem that there is an intense

7:05hypocrisy in my home country about which

7:07religions are allowed to demonstrate

7:09themselves in public and which are not.

7:11How would you respond to that and to

7:12Dave's points about assembly? Well, I

7:15think the the issue that we see in

7:17general in Europe is that the concept of

7:19human rights is one that only seems to

7:22apply to foreigners and not to the

7:26native population and not to the

7:28original culture or the original

7:30tradition that is the foundation of

7:31Europe, which is Christianity. So, every

7:34single time We all know this, right?

7:35Every single time we talk about human

7:37rights treaties, they are used against

7:39us. And it's never discussed, okay, but

7:42what are the rights of the native

7:43people? What, you know, how should we

7:44protect those? In fact,

7:46there are these types of of treaties and

7:49these laws are used against us to limit

7:52our freedom of speech, which happens all

7:53of the time. So, I wouldn't argue for

7:56stricter uh laws to restrain the freedom

8:00of speech of groups that might be

8:02against us, because those laws are just

8:03going to be used against not against

8:05them, but against us, obviously. So, I

8:07don't want to give our establishment any

8:09more tools in that sense. I think that

8:11the answer to the problems that we're

8:12facing now um and to the abuse that

8:15we're seeing of these treaties is

8:17remigration. So, we need to make sure

8:20that our culture becomes that our

8:22nations become culturally uh homogeneous

8:24again. Otherwise, you cannot have that

8:26type of social contract contract. It

8:29doesn't work. Um so, you know, for that,

8:32we will probably have to leave a lot of

8:34these human rights treaties as well. Um

8:36I I really don't see how we can operate

8:39within a system that is so corrupted,

8:41that is being abused and used against us

8:44so deeply anymore.

8:46If I could add to that for a moment,

8:48this is why it's interesting the to

8:50whittle down the difference between free

8:51speech and right to assembly. So, one of

8:53the problems we're having in New York

8:54City right now, for example, is they

8:56have all of these pro-Palestinian Again,

8:59I call them pro-Hamas protesters, who

9:01are specifically going to synagogues and

9:03protesting outside synagogues. Now, I

9:06will defend their right to free speech

9:08as protesters. Now, do they do they use

9:11that in in the most uh specific way

9:15against against us? The answer is yes,

9:17because there are often actual calls to

9:19violence and genocide and things of that

9:20nature. Now, I don't want the police

9:22coming in and grabbing these people uh

9:24for several reasons. I think it

9:25amplifies it. There's There's all sorts

9:27of reasons you don't. However, if we

9:28consistently let these people Okay, you

9:31are allowed to at any time when you

9:33want, you are allowed to have hundreds

9:35of people outside a synagogue

9:37protesting, outside a church protesting,

9:39et cetera, et cetera. Ultimately, the

9:41societal contract that Eva's talking

9:43about will start crumbling. People will

9:45not be able to go to places of worship.

9:47Eventually, they'll hunt you down at

9:49your business, which we've seen a lot of

9:50these types of things as well. And

9:51that's been happening across Europe. So,

9:53that's what we're going to grapple with.

9:54We have a We have a set of people that

9:57have a certain set of ideas that are

9:59completely counter to everything the

10:01West is about. We brought them in or I

10:04would say I'm an American, so in Europe

10:06I would say you guys brought them in. We

10:08have a We have a We have a version of it

10:10in America.

10:11But you guys brought them in and now

10:13will you do the things that are probably

10:16necessary to save your country. That

10:18That's the ultimate question.

10:20It does strike me that there's an

10:21inherent difference though here between

10:24Britain and America in that America is

10:25founded on the idea of E pluribus unum,

10:27that from the many you gain one, one

10:30people, one culture, one language. Uh

10:33specifically non-religious. Uh so how it

10:36Do you think it would be possible to

10:37implement? We're seeing a little of this

10:39with ICE, but how do you think it would

10:40be possible to implement the policies

10:42that are necessary to reverse the

10:44takeover of the public square by these

10:46hostile elements and yet retain uh a

10:48fidelity to the spirit of America?

10:50>> Well, on the re-immigration issue, I

10:52mean we have a huge problem in America

10:54that Europe has, which is that in the

10:55Biden administration alone in those four

10:57years

10:58it's unclear how many people came in,

11:00but most estimates say 15 to 20 million

11:03people. Now that's on top of we probably

11:05had about 12 million illegals before

11:07that and there are the dreamers, you

11:08know, there are people who were born

11:09here. So we don't know what the numbers

11:11are, but let's say 20 million people.

11:12We're a country of 350 million people.

11:15Um does anyone here know how many people

11:16Donald Trump has deported through ICE?

11:19Does anyone know the number by chance?

11:213 million?

11:223 million? I wish it was 3 million.

11:24Anyone want to take another guess? You

11:26know it's the cell deportation. What's

11:28that? Two. Two million? No, I wish it

11:30was two. How many cells?

11:32Yeah, it's about 800,000.

11:34It's about 800,000 people in the years

11:37since ICE has been on the street. So if

11:39you take roughly 20 million people and

11:42if only 10 million of them are truly

11:44nefarious, put aside that they broke the

11:46law by coming in. But if 10% of them

11:50have anti-Western views or doing truly

11:53illegal things beyond just coming into

11:54the country. Uh well, you can do the

11:56numbers on that. That's 2 million people

11:58and if 2 million and if 10% of those 2

12:01million are the worst thing that you can

12:04imagine, we can do the numbers on that.

12:06And will we have the strength and the

12:09fortitude

12:10to get rid of these people? The answer

12:13probably is no. I mean no one really

12:15wants to think about that, but would we

12:17really do it? I mean look at the

12:18pushback that Donald Trump got just by

12:21going into one city in Minnesota where

12:23it was pretty clear that these people

12:25should not be here. Eva.

12:28We can't allow ourselves to think that

12:29way.

12:31I I mean if we do it, then it's over,

12:33especially here in Europe because our

12:34situation is I would argue worse.

12:36It's worse.

12:38Uh I I I can see the faces now in the

12:40audience when you guys heard the

12:41800,000. We were like, "Oh, we wish."

12:44Like [laughter] no, you know? I mean

12:47here, I mean we have millions coming in

12:49every year uh still. So, you know, I'm

12:52talking and I'm arguing for a

12:54re-migration, but we haven't even closed

12:55the borders yet. So that is like, you

12:58know, we're count your blessings, Dave,

13:00but I understand what you mean though.

13:02We need We need harsher action and I've

13:05also seen of course the pushback in

13:06Minnesota. Um

13:08but we we here in Europe, we have really

13:11no time to lose. Like we are as as you

13:14said, obviously the history of our

13:17continent is different. Um our ethnic

13:19makeup is historically different. You

13:22know, this country was not a

13:23predominantly white continent. It wasn't

13:25essentially an entirely white continent

13:27and that has changed over the time span

13:29of what, two generations. And now we're

13:31coming close to the point where we are

13:33becoming a minority in our own

13:35homelands. And that was not something

13:38that we could even discuss as much as

13:39five years ago, but we can now and that

13:43is something that I do take, let's say

13:46some some I I get I I gain some hope

13:48from that fact, not because of the

13:51political action, because there is only

13:53political inaction and uh unwillingness

13:55to do anything about this in most

13:57Western European countries.

13:59But there is something

14:01I think tangible changing with the

14:03European population. And that brings me

14:06back to what you said earlier, Dave. You

14:08said, "You let them in." But we have to

14:11remember that the European people

14:14consistently

14:16say that they are against mass

14:17migration. Like the most recent numbers

14:19that came out were, you know, if you see

14:21the different European countries

14:23it's between what, 60 and 80% of almost

14:26every single Northwestern European

14:27country that says, "I'm not in favor of

14:29mass migration." And you know, this is

14:31not a democratically made decision. This

14:34wasn't We weren't asked. You know, in

14:362015 when Merkel decided to open the

14:39borders to more than 2 million

14:40immigrants, we were not asked. There was

14:43emotional warfare being waged against

14:45the European population with sad imagery

14:48and of course calling us a racist,

14:50fascist, Nazi every single time that we

14:52said, "Hmm, maybe this is not a great

14:54idea." And you know, as much as yes

14:58it's gone downhill from there, it's also

15:01gone uphill in the sense that now at

15:03least there is a discussion possible

15:04about it. And I think that a lot of

15:05people have stopped caring about being

15:08called a racist for wanting their own

15:11homelands to remain their homelands. And

15:13that's where I see the true

15:15possibilities and that's why the

15:16censorship is so important and of course

15:20why it centers, I think, around two

15:22subjects most harshly, let's say,

15:25immigration. Right? There's almost no

15:28right-wing activist left in Europe that

15:30is not facing legal charges because of

15:33their anti-immigration or

15:35pro-re-migration stance. Um I have just

15:37personally been banned, as you know,

15:39from the United Kingdom mostly for that,

15:41of course. Um

15:43social media censorship I've personally

15:45experienced myself. My phone is under

15:48mercenary spyware attack. I mean, what

15:51do we you know, what's next? All of

15:53these things are happening and it

15:54centers especially on those two subjects

15:56because on immigration and abortion.

15:59Because I think the agenda is native

16:02European population has to be replaced

16:04and they can't have children. So what

16:07are you going to do? You're going to

16:08promote abortion. You're going to make

16:10it incredibly difficult for Europeans to

16:12have children. That's of course

16:13happening as a result also of mass

16:15migration. Uh the unsa- the insecurity,

16:18uh the the economic pressure

16:21uh and also the demoralization of our

16:23population. And and and in in sheer

16:26numbers. And so that's I think exactly

16:28why the censorship centers around those

16:31two subjects the most. And what can we

16:34do about that?

16:35Well, we have to of course continue to

16:37speak out as much as we can still. We

16:40have a platform where we can do it on X.

16:42Uh and they can't put us all in jail.

16:45So that's why pushing the Overton window

16:47is so important.

16:51>> [applause]

16:54>> Dave,

16:55Eva makes a compelling case to what has

16:57been called the great replacement

16:58theory.

17:00And um it is a compelling case. You

17:02argue it with passion and

17:04uh with great logic. Do you agree though

17:07that it is a reality or is it merely

17:09merely a case of correlation leading

17:11some to believe in causation?

17:13>> Right. Well, first off, I do want to

17:14fully clarify that when I say you,

17:17Europe, I mean the leaders of Europe and

17:19that not the people because you are

17:21completely right about that. This was

17:23done with very little oversight. And And

17:26again, that's also what we saw in

17:27America. The average American during the

17:29four years of Biden allowing these

17:31people in and these insane videos that

17:33we saw of people just flooding our

17:35country. There is one I will answer your

17:36question, but very quickly. There was

17:37one video

17:41that I think really changed the course

17:43of American politics and probably the

17:45entire world, which is that when Bobby

17:47Kennedy, who was running as a Democrat,

17:50he had never really said anything about

17:53uh the border or immigration. That

17:54obviously wasn't his thing. Health was

17:56his main issue. He went to the border

17:58and I'm sure some of you saw this video.

18:00He stood there and he just started

18:02asking people where they were coming

18:04from and it was Pakistan and India and

18:06Africa and Chad and all these and it and

18:08you could see his mind being blown right

18:11at that very moment. So nobody asked for

18:13any of this. Whether it was planned and

18:15is there an actual replacement theory?

18:18You know, I would say my my favorite

18:21quote from the great Carl Sagan is

18:22extraordinary claims require

18:24extraordinary evidence. So I don't know

18:26that it was fully planned. Are there

18:28plans in Brussels to ultimately replace

18:30all these people and they just see no

18:32utility for the native populations and

18:34they don't want borders or sovereign

18:36nation states? That kind of does sound

18:38right to me. So I would say it probably

18:41was at least directionally planned and I

18:45think they unfortunately saw Europeans

18:47fold very quickly. You know, on my show

18:50almost every day we discuss some of this

18:52from a European perspective because I

18:54want Americans to see what is coming.

18:57You know, I I don't want the strife that

19:00you guys have. We have versions of it.

19:01We've had four Islamic terrorist attacks

19:03in the United States in the last month

19:05in New York City in

19:07in Austin, Texas. We had two others. And

19:09what's interesting is these things

19:11happen and then they're gone. They're

19:13out of the news within 24 hours. So will

19:16we just start having the situation that

19:19much of Europe has, which is, "Oh yeah,

19:20there was an explosion over there and

19:23and the you know, people don't go in the

19:24trains over here anymore and everything

19:25else." So I use Europe as a warning and

19:28I and I'm I would say as an American,

19:31um

19:31there's a way to take the things that

19:35you guys have been talking about and

19:36dealing with and and kind of show we

19:39this isn't what we want America to turn

19:41into. We also have other

19:42uh defenses because we have states'

19:44rights and uh we we are a much better,

19:47more armed uh civilization. We have more

19:49guns than people, quite literally. So

19:51there's other protections, thankfully.

19:53Um

19:54there's other protections that we have

19:56uh that the Europeans don't have. But,

19:58yeah, I I don't know if it's exactly

20:00planned down to the minute with you

20:02know, crossed uh crossed tees and all

20:04that, but it feels that way.

20:06I think one of the things we'd all agree

20:08on is that this is essentially an elite

20:10set of beliefs, an elite project.

20:12You, Dave, a man formerly of shall we

20:15say the progressive left, if not a

20:16leftist, the old saw goes that a

20:19conservative is merely been mugged by

20:21reality. How much mugging by reality do

20:24the elites of Europe and of the wider

20:27West require

20:28>> Yeah.

20:29Well, people used to mean it

20:31figuratively, now they literally mean

20:32it. There are people in New York who get

20:34mugged and they register Republican the

20:36next day. Um

20:39I don't know. I don't know. You know, in

20:41the in the Western world, we we are so

20:43advanced, we are so free, we are so

20:45distracted by our phones and the all of

20:48the beauties of modern life and video

20:51games or whatever it is that we do that

20:54we we slowly let go of everything,

20:56right? You know, uh

20:58good men create hard times and it seems

21:01to I'm sorry, uh hard times create good

21:04men, good men create soft times, you got

21:07it. And and that seems to me where we're

21:09at right now. We may not have enough

21:11people, but I will give you a a white

21:13pill version of this would be how does

21:16it all turn around? Well, America is

21:17clearly exerting itself on the world

21:19stage again. And if, and this is a big

21:22if, but if the midterms go well for the

21:25Republicans, which you know, by

21:26conventional wisdom, the incumbent

21:28president's party loses 70% of the time.

21:30Obviously, we have a war right now.

21:31There's plenty of reasons to argue that

21:33maybe it will not go well. We have huge

21:34problems with the election integrity,

21:36etc. But, if it goes well, Donald Trump

21:40will be completely unchained in a way

21:42that we've never seen. If you Yeah, if

21:44you think

21:46if you think you've seen this man

21:47unchain unchained, like wait till you

21:50see what Donald Trump, knowing that he's

21:52never running again, knowing he doesn't

21:53have to worry about midterms, and he

21:56might actually do some of the things

21:58that need to be done from an American

22:00perspective in terms of getting more

22:01people out. He's hampered right now.

22:03It's true.

22:05>> [applause]

22:07>> It's true. If you saw what happened in

22:08Minnesota, you know, they went in, they

22:11sent all these ICE agents there. They

22:13were getting rid of all sorts of people.

22:14Then, there were two incidences uh where

22:17American citizens were killed. One was

22:19in a car and she hit She quite literally

22:21hit an ICE agent. The other guy had a

22:23gun and was wrestling with ICE agents.

22:25But, Trump is sensitive to media still.

22:27So, when it started getting a little

22:29hot, he did pull back a bit. But, Trump,

22:32if he has the House and the Senate and

22:35never has to run again, I think there's

22:37a chance he really goes all in on this,

22:39particularly if the Iran war ends well,

22:42which my suspicion is it will.

22:44Um and then and then hopefully that's

22:46the signal for Europe to do what it

22:48needs to do.

22:50I'm glad you mentioned the Iran war,

22:51because that allows me to jump to

22:52Ukraine.

22:53Um

22:54We We cannot, I think, moan about the

22:57decline of Western civilization and our

22:59need to protect it whilst

23:01simultaneously, as some on the right do,

23:03saying that Ukraine should be left to

23:05the wolves. Now, I know that Dave,

23:07you've had a variety of opinions on this

23:08subject and on your program I've hosted

23:11many people with the breadth of opinion.

23:13Eva, I think you have a rather more

23:14rigid view of the situation. Um Given

23:16your beliefs, and perhaps Eva, you'll

23:18start and then Dave would follow, how do

23:20you justify your various positions on

23:22this matter?

23:23Well, I would I would immediately

23:26disagree with the idea that

23:28first of all, they're not being left to

23:29the wolves at all. It's like the

23:32the opposite is exactly what is

23:33happening now. And there's only one

23:36country, in fact, that is keeping some

23:38sort of level head headedness when it

23:39comes to this and we're in it right now.

23:41That's Hungary. And they've had

23:45>> [applause]

23:49>> Prime Minister Orbán, I think, has had

23:50the only sensible and the only morally

23:53correct position on this and that is

23:54that he's pro-peace and he doesn't want

23:57to further this and doesn't want to send

24:00neither billions of of euros over the

24:03border, which is happening, as we know,

24:05200 200 billion euros have already been

24:08sent to Ukraine. Now, there's the 90

24:11billion question. Uh he's the only one

24:14saying no to that. And what happened?

24:16Zelenskyy said essentially that he

24:19wanted to send his soldiers over to to

24:21Viktor Orbán's house. I mean, you know,

24:23we're dealing with extreme political

24:24blackmail here from a bunch of people

24:27that I would say are the wolves. That's

24:30the European Union.

24:32So, yes, I I have a a bit more of a

24:35rigid position on that, I suppose, it's

24:37because I see that

24:39really quite literally the opposite is

24:40happening of what you are saying. And

24:42it's not to say that I am therefore

24:44pro-Russia or anti-Ukraine,

24:48but there's never been even the latest

24:50normal debate possible on this without

24:53being called, you know, a a Putin

24:55puppet. If you say, "Oh, I really don't

24:58think that the EU should be so deeply

25:00involved in this." Or, "Oh, why are they

25:02arguing so staunchly for membership of

25:05Ukraine to the European Union?" Because

25:07that was clearly the goal from the very

25:09beginning. And look what is happening

25:11now. You know, Ursula von der Leyen is

25:12the president of the European

25:14Commission. Her banner on X is a

25:16Ukrainian flag. Ukraine is not a member

25:18state of the European Union yet. I mean,

25:21that's ridiculous, no? That shows her

25:23That shows us where her alliances lie

25:25and they're not with the European people

25:28and the member states that are actually

25:29a part of this union. So, you That's

25:32where I see the biggest problem in this

25:34is that the people who are most in favor

25:37of sending

25:38money that they don't have, because who

25:40is paying for those loans? We and our

25:43children to the end of their days,

25:45to send that money out to a foreign

25:47nation that doesn't serve necessarily

25:50our interests and they are not in favor

25:52of normal peace negotiations. They're

25:54trying to block all of that. What do

25:55they want? Do they want this to go on

25:57forever? You know, I am I'm someone who

25:59likes to see things realistically.

26:01Um and I think that they have not done

26:03that with regards to this conflict.

26:06I also, maybe this, you know, I will go

26:08back for a second to the question of

26:10immigration because it ties into it.

26:12When we are talking about things like

26:13intent, for example. Like I'm someone

26:16who likes to look at the situation maybe

26:20some might say, you know, too too

26:22simply. But,

26:24if you don't know exactly why someone is

26:26doing something, and this is a quote

26:28that I always like to say, look at the

26:30consequences and infer the motive.

26:32That's the same That's the thing that I

26:33do when it comes to mass immigration.

26:35You know, they've been seeing the

26:36consequences, for example, the terror

26:39attacks in Europe that happened almost

26:41on a daily basis and we've gotten

26:42totally numb to that as well back in

26:442014.

26:45But, you know, if we think about it, I

26:47don't think you have forgotten that. Uh

26:50we we know the safe the the the the the

26:53concerns of safety that we have.

26:55Budapest is the only city in Europe that

26:57I visit and I come to every year and

26:59say, "Hmm, this seems to get better by

27:01the year."

27:02Every other city just deteriorates.

27:05That's our status quo.

27:07You know, if they knew this, they saw

27:09it, like I said, are they doing anything

27:11to to reverse it? No, borders are still

27:13open.

27:14So, you know, that's why I can't look

27:17away from that without concluding that

27:20there is true true intent.

27:22Because otherwise, you would do

27:23something about it, no? At a certain

27:25point, you would say, "Okay, enough boys

27:27and girls have been killed and raped."

27:29It's It's It's enough now.

27:30They're not doing it.

27:35>> [applause]

27:38>> Well, I'll say two things quickly about

27:40about Ukraine. One, from an American

27:42perspective, it really is off the media

27:44map right now. And it's been that way

27:46for quite some time, almost with the

27:49exception of the the White House visit

27:52where Trump and uh J.D. Vance

27:54smack-downed Zelenskyy, it's pretty much

27:56been off the map. I mean, nobody's

27:58really talking about it, mainstream or

28:00online media.

28:02My position on Ukraine has been

28:04basically the same if you go back from

28:05the day it all started. It's exactly

28:07what I've said, which is that you have

28:09to show me. How could Ukraine win the

28:12war? What would be enough that we could

28:14give them? Okay, so tell me the amount

28:15of tanks, tell me the amount of weapons,

28:18tell me the amount of rockets and

28:20soldiers and all and the amount of

28:21money. Tell me what that is and explain

28:23to me how that will have them win the

28:25war. And no one has been able to explain

28:27that. So, I think it's basically I mean,

28:30I actually agree with probably

28:31everything that Eva said right there.

28:33We've now created this sort of endless

28:35boondoggle and I don't see, unless I'm

28:38missing something, I don't see a great

28:39desire for Ukraine to negotiate at this

28:43point. And that in no way is a defense

28:45of Putin. It's no way a defense of

28:47invading another nation's sovereign

28:48borders.

28:49Um

28:50but again, from an American perspective,

28:52it it

28:53it's like ninth out of the top 10 things

28:55that people are talking about right now.

28:57And what position in the public mind

28:59would you say that the conflict in Iran

29:00holds?

29:02Well, right now, it's probably number

29:03one. If you would have asked me for the

29:04first year of the Trump presidency, it

29:06was all border and deportations, 100%.

29:09Now, I would say the Iran thing looms

29:12large over everything. You know, we're

29:13in day 21 or 22 of it right now and and

29:16that's that's leading everybody's, you

29:18know, coverage of everything. Now,

29:20talking of how a conflict ends, I

29:22believe that America has now sent 5,000

29:24missiles into Iran at a cost of 16

29:26billion dollars and the stockpiles are

29:28simply running out. How does President

29:30Trump conclude this this uh this war

29:32without ignominy? Well, it's been

29:34interesting because

29:37from a a military perspective, it's gone

29:39unbelievably well. I mean, in 20 days,

29:41Trump promised to get out of forever

29:42wars. And obviously, you guys know

29:45there's a contingent of people on the

29:46right, largely led by Tucker Carlson who

29:48are radically anti-war and anti that are

29:51isolationist and isolationism is a

29:53completely

29:54perfectly legitimate political position

29:56to hold. I think there's some other

29:58things going on with Tucker but that's a

30:00that's a different topic altogether.

30:03Which we probably don't have time for

30:04and I'd need a drink for.

30:07However,

30:10I would say militarily look we took out

30:12their navy. We took out their air force.

30:14There's complete air domination. Their

30:16ballistic missile program is completely

30:18gone. They cannot produce a ballistic

30:19missile anymore. The nuke program is

30:22gone. So militarily this thing has gone

30:25extremely well and 20 days certainly is

30:27not a forever war. Donald Trump never

30:29said he he didn't want any war to do

30:32anything. He said he was against forever

30:34wars and my general sense is and and

30:37this has been made very clear by Trump

30:39and particularly Marco Rubio and Pete

30:42Hegseth from the Department of War as we

30:44now call it that we are going to

30:47decapitate this regime. We are going to

30:49stop their proxies all over the Middle

30:51East and Europe from spreading terror

30:53which is gone as far as Latin America. I

30:55think that that is working. We're seeing

30:58new alliances in the Middle East.

30:59Suddenly all the Gulf countries are

31:02going boy it's Iran shooting rockets at

31:04us and it's Israel actually defending

31:06us. So I think there is going to be a

31:08figurative rewriting of the map and all

31:10sorts of peace deals after. And of

31:12course the the million dollar question

31:13on all of this is what can the Iranian

31:15people do after?

31:17I don't know the answer to that but I

31:19suspect that clearly Trump and Netanyahu

31:22and others they this this has been

31:24planned for quite some time. You you

31:26aren't able to do something so

31:28overwhelmingly miraculous

31:30militarily so quickly and efficiently

31:33without a secondary plan. So I don't

31:35know if that's bringing back Pavlovi

31:36back. I don't know I don't know what

31:37that rebuilding of the institution of

31:39the country looks like but it seems to

31:41me there has to be a plan for it. And

31:43again that's still to the backdrop of

31:44the midterm elections which Trump knows

31:46he needs he needs a win before that. And

31:49and that could be his

31:52Even the European countries have for the

31:53most part been if not just reticent

31:56outright hostile to joining in the

31:58American Israeli war against Iran which

32:00I agree entirely with Dave is the

32:02progenitor of most Islamic terrorism in

32:04the world.

32:05Given your views on

32:07Islam it's inherent character do you not

32:09think that we should have gone full

32:11square behind America behind Israel and

32:13try to wipe out this evil regime

32:16forever.

32:17Well I think what we see in Europe is

32:19that same as in America it's something

32:21that's splitting the right, right? I

32:23mean it's less of an a subject here.

32:25It's not our number one priority I would

32:27say if I talk to people

32:29in our sphere not even dominating the

32:32media as much as it is in America

32:33obviously cuz we're not so deeply

32:36involved.

32:37I once again I think our leadership has

32:41extremely but always you know this is no

32:43exception this time always has bad

32:46judgment. So I really wouldn't even want

32:50to waste too many words talking about

32:52that so much. I think what is really

32:55important though is that we on the right

32:56try to stay united on the subject

32:58especially if what this means for

33:00Europe. I see a lot of people for

33:01example argue oh but this is going to

33:03cause new waves of mass migration to the

33:07to Europe to the continent because we've

33:09seen that in the past and that is of

33:10course true. We have seen how

33:12destabilization of the Middle East has

33:15caused mass immigration. But then we

33:17come back and this is what I really

33:19would like Europeans to you know to

33:21remember is that falls or stands not

33:24with what happens in the Middle East but

33:25it falls or stands with what happens

33:27with our leadership. So you know no

33:30matter how bad the turmoil is in other

33:34parts of the world if we would have

33:36people in power who would stand for our

33:39people our continent and our religion

33:43then that wouldn't really matter so

33:45much. You know just keep the border

33:46shut. That's the answer and that is not

33:50happening and I think that we as

33:52Europeans should keep that in the

33:53forefront of our mind at all costs. And

33:56then we can have debates and we can have

33:58discussions and we can disagree all we

34:01want on how we think that other parts of

34:03the world should be run and whether

34:04America should get involved or not but

34:07for our nations the most important thing

34:09is that we make sure that our leadership

34:10is in order and it's not. So you know

34:12again maybe it's boring cuz I'm getting

34:13back to the same thing over and over

34:15again but we seem to get distracted so

34:17easily when our problems here at home

34:19are really really large. If I could add

34:21it quickly not only do I agree with that

34:23I think Donald Trump agrees with that. I

34:24don't think Donald Trump cares what the

34:26Europeans think largely. I think he

34:29cares what Orban thinks actually but I

34:31know it is a good thing. I think Donald

34:33Trump clearly not I think I know Donald

34:36Trump would way more respect European

34:39leaders who were standing up for their

34:41country even if he didn't agree with the

34:42exact policy. If he saw people if he saw

34:45Keir Starmer or any European leader that

34:48was genuinely standing up for their

34:50country

34:51if he had a policy disagreement Trump

34:53loves that and that would be fine. But

34:55what he sees are a bunch of weak

34:57feckless people that will not stand up

34:59for their own countrymen and who who

35:02actually are afraid of the people

35:04they've imported. I don't know if you

35:06saw I just saw it this morning so it

35:08probably happened in the last few hours

35:09but even in Australia where I was just a

35:11few months ago and I was I was shocked

35:14by the immigration system there and they

35:16don't have illegal they don't have an

35:17illegal problem they have a legal

35:18problem obviously because of their

35:20geography but the Prime Minister

35:23Albanese went to a mosque. I mean this

35:24is a guy who has placated and pandered

35:27to the leftists his entire career and he

35:30basically got booed out of the mosque

35:32because he hasn't offered enough to

35:34these people. So what's happening is the

35:35left the left always eats its own and

35:38they think I think Starmer and Albanese

35:40and several of these Macron

35:43they think oh if they play nice with the

35:44Islamists I think they basically think

35:47they'll get beheaded last and they're

35:48realizing it's the window the window is

35:51not so long open anymore.

35:54Well I think in the case of Keir Starmer

35:56everything comes down to the fact that

35:58he's an international human rights

35:59lawyer and therefore there is no such

36:01thing as national sovereignty there's no

36:02such thing as belonging there is no such

36:04thing as our people or their people or

36:06our religion or their culture. It is

36:08entirely explicable by this as with most

36:10of his cabinet. Um

36:12The the third topic we are to discuss is

36:14the left and I want to begin this by

36:16asking is there such a thing any longer

36:18as the good left? Um I think we can all

36:21point to figures in all of our country's

36:22histories who we would say we disagreed

36:24with politically but were undoubtedly

36:26patriots of good faith and good

36:27character who wanted their nations to

36:29succeed. Is that still the case would

36:31you say?

36:34You know what the thing is is I really

36:36haven't given the concept of the left

36:38sounds weird but that much thought

36:40lately

36:42because I feel like they're becoming

36:43more and more relevant especially here

36:45in Europe in the sense that

36:47you know the

36:49the really idiotic leftist ideas that

36:52we've seen

36:53emerge especially 10 years ago you know

36:55wokeism etc. I feel like that's really

36:58on the way out even with the left kind

37:02of you know of course it's still very

37:03present in in the institutions and in

37:05the at the universities which is

37:07important to fight but if I see the

37:10younger generations like Gen Z is not

37:12buying the idea that there are 73

37:14genders. Like you know you're not you

37:16they're not really thinking about that

37:18that much at least here in Europe. The

37:20question is more identitarian. Feel like

37:22that is the thing that is on our minds

37:25and that's something that we see a big

37:26split sadly in between especially

37:29females and males. So young boys are

37:33very right wing becoming increasingly

37:36right wing the younger they go and the

37:38girls not so much.

37:41But so yeah the left I mean the the

37:43European Union to me is a bigger problem

37:47even than our national leftist parties

37:50because no matter you know what our

37:52coalitions end up becoming. Now in the

37:54Netherlands we have a new leftist

37:55government which is horrible and you

37:57know I I can't stand them and I can't

38:00stand what they're what they're voting

38:01for but even if we don't have a leftist

38:04government as we didn't have the last

38:06two years or so we still have that

38:09monstrous institution the European Union

38:11that is making laws that have precedence

38:13over our national laws. So that's where

38:16I really see the biggest issue because

38:18our democracy does not function. It

38:21really doesn't exist this way and the

38:24fact that Trump is making fun of the the

38:27Eurocrats you know

38:29I think that's glorious.

38:31We need that so desperately and it's

38:34such a positive development that this

38:37administration is very vocal about the

38:40injustices that is that are happening in

38:42Europe that Rubio is talking about it.

38:45Vance is talking about it. Trump is

38:46talking about it. He said it now just

38:48this week for the I think the third time

38:50like oh Europe is really not going on

38:52the right path. Soon there will be no

38:53Europe if you go on this way. You know

38:55how of such crucial important that is

38:58important that is for us Europeans

39:00because we have this institution that we

39:03have no democratic means to fight

39:05really. You know you can't vote people

39:08out that you never voted in in the first

39:10place and that's that's the case with

39:12Ursula von der Leyen. So

39:14this type of political pressure like we

39:17really need that to come from the United

39:19States because they are as we've seen

39:22with this censorship and with all of the

39:24other madness coming from the European

39:26Union you're they're just doubling down.

39:28So I really see America in that sense as

39:32our only hope because it's the only

39:35political counterweight

39:37to the European Union that's actually

39:39going to make them you know in Dutch we

39:41would say sing a little less loudly, you

39:44know? You know what I mean?

39:46So, I I see that as a great great great

39:49development and I can I only hope that

39:51they're going to do more of that because

39:52they those people really need to be put

39:54in their place a bit.

39:56So, there's a couple things here when it

39:58comes to is there anything left on the

40:00left? Well, first of all, I was glad to

40:03hear Ishaan even use the word liberal in

40:06the proper sense of classical

40:08liberalism. You know, my first book was

40:11was the best-selling book about

40:12classical liberalism, I think in the

40:13last like 40 years in America and I'm

40:15not saying that to pat myself on the

40:16back as much as the word liberal has

40:19been so

40:20dragged through the mud that I don't

40:23even even though I do believe in

40:25classical liberal values, which was what

40:27the whole book was about. Those are the

40:28things that I think lead to flourishing

40:30societies rooted in the individual, it's

40:32impossible really outside of very

40:34specific places, probably like this

40:36room, for me to say I'm a liberal

40:38without people thinking I'm insane. So,

40:40so that's

40:42I'm always glad when I'm in a space

40:44where there are people that still

40:45acknowledge the the value of of

40:47classical liberalism. Now,

40:48unfortunately, there are virtually no

40:51classical liberals in the Democrat Party

40:53as it stands in 2026. Really, the only

40:56two people from a from let's say a

40:59leftist perspective or a Democrat Party

41:01perspective in America who are defending

41:03liberalism are John Fetterman, who's the

41:07senator from Pennsylvania, who quite

41:09literally was a leftist and had brain

41:11damage and as his brain has healed, he's

41:13become more conservative. So, that

41:15>> [laughter]

41:17>> that tells you something.

41:19But he's still wearing those hoodies, I

41:20don't know why. That'll be the final the

41:22final move for him. He's going to say,

41:23"You know what? I'm pro-life and I'm

41:24putting on a suit and that's it." Um

41:27but it's him and Bill Maher, of course,

41:28who's been the standard-bearer for true

41:30liberalism in America. But

41:32interestingly, and I have said this to

41:34Bill Maher on air several times and and

41:36the first time I said it to him was

41:38about 4 years ago and and you can watch

41:39it. It was on his Club Random show and

41:40you can see him light up because he I

41:42don't think he had quite heard it so

41:44granularly. This is well before he had

41:46broke bread with Trump, you know, about

41:48a year ago and it was before the

41:50re-election of Trump. And I said, "Bill,

41:52tell me this. Where do you think you

41:54would go and be responded better to?

41:56Would it be if you went to an AOC rally

42:01or a Trump rally?"

42:03And suddenly, you can you can literally

42:04see his eyes open up because he realized

42:07the people that hate Bill Maher, that

42:09are going after liberalism,

42:12the idea to think differently rooted in

42:14the individual, they're all on the left.

42:16They want you to think what they think

42:18the second they think it and that's it.

42:21And I would also add

42:22that even though I think Abe was right

42:24that wokeism in a certain sense,

42:26particularly the gender stuff, has sort

42:28of burned itself out. I think the thing

42:30that we're seeing is that it's actually

42:32now taking its final form and its final

42:34form is the marriage with Islam and

42:37that's what we have with Zohran Mamdani

42:39in New York and that obviously you have

42:42I mean, many senses has taken over many

42:44cities in in the UK particularly. So,

42:48the state of the left, I would say, is

42:51disastrous. In America, the fact that

42:54I'm sure many of you saw it when Donald

42:56Trump gave the State of the Union and

42:57all he asked everyone in that chamber to

43:00do was stand up if you think that you

43:03are here to protect Americans' rights

43:05first and not one Democrat stood up. I

43:08mean, that was a really good the guy

43:10understands television and he

43:12understands moments and his pause and

43:14the way he stepped away from the mic and

43:16he just looked at them and pointed.

43:18And I think Americans are realizing that

43:20and and again, that's why I'm not as

43:22negative on the midterms as as most

43:24people are. However, the marriage now of

43:28the woksters

43:30with the Islamists is the great

43:32challenge and and it's the challenge

43:34that Europeans have been dealing with

43:36that now we are going to see. But the

43:38woke the purely woke bananas part of it,

43:41I think is now going to be hidden under

43:42something else that will be much more

43:44wrapped in just outright communism. You

43:46know, years ago, Bernie Sanders used to

43:48always say he's a Democrat Socialist.

43:51They don't say Democrat anymore. They

43:52just now they say they are socialists,

43:54right? Zohran Mamdani is a socialist. He

43:56ran on a socialist platform. He's really

43:58a communist, which he'll say in about 2

44:00years, but it's it's a slow unmasking

44:03and I do think people see it.

44:06I feel like that marriage is going to be

44:08short-lived though.

44:09Obviously.

44:10>> Oh, yeah. Well, Cuz the moment that they

44:12outnumber you, they'll push you off the

44:14building first, right? That's it.

44:15>> Well, queers

44:16queers for Palestine is very different

44:18than Palestine for queers and

44:22Exactly.

44:23>> [applause]

44:26>> But fortunately, there are less high

44:28roofs to throw them off in Gaza now, so,

44:30you know.

44:31Oh.

44:33Wow, I could work blue in here. Okay.

44:35Good. Good.

44:38Wokeism, it was said by the historian

44:39Tom Holland in Dominion is a warped form

44:41of Christianity. Um one of the things

44:45we've mentioned a couple of times in

44:46this debate so far is abortion. It seems

44:48to me

44:49pretty unarguable that the absence of

44:51Christianity from society has completely

44:53removed our moral foundation. And that

44:56if there is to be a resumption of

44:58Western civilization along the lines

44:59that we all hope, it cannot be done

45:02without God. We sit in the nation where

45:03the first thing you see as you enter the

45:05airport is the slogan of God, family and

45:08country. They are absolutely

45:10unapologetic about this.

45:12As a whereas as a friend of ours text

45:14today from me the other day, you land in

45:15London, you could be in Cairo or

45:16anywhere because you see

45:18a multicultural nation with absolutely

45:20no

45:21adhesion to its Christian past.

45:23I think it's fair to say that Dave that

45:26you have a

45:27a less a strong adherence to

45:29Christianity than we do.

45:31Would you agree with my analysis though

45:33that without God, there can be no

45:35resumption of the West?

45:36>> Oh, absolutely. I mean, I can give you

45:38a purely secular argument for that,

45:40which is that our founders

45:42enshrined in the Bill of Rights the

45:44defense of what they called our

45:46God-given rights, right? I mean, a lot

45:49of people this it was a constant debate

45:51years ago that Jordan Peterson and Sam

45:52Harris had, you know, did all of the

45:54flourishing of the Western world come

45:56from the Enlightenment or really did

45:59year did generations and centuries of of

46:04religious texts and belief get us to the

46:07Enlightenment so that we could then have

46:08this expansion of true liberalism. The

46:11answer to that is obviously yes.

46:14I I happen to be Jewish, but I agree

46:16with everything that you said there

46:17absolutely and I'm blessed and thrilled

46:20to live in a Christian nation and I

46:22would hope that it will stay that way

46:23100%.

46:25Avi, you mentioned earlier

46:27the demographic

46:28bomb coming up that young men are

46:30becoming more conservative and more

46:32religious. Young women are adhering as

46:34it dies ever more strongly to

46:35progressivism. Should this trend

46:38continue, how do we get young women such

46:40as yourself back to God?

46:45I don't know

46:47specifically for for

46:49girls or for boys if the approach should

46:51be any different because the truth is

46:52the truth.

46:54And I think that's exactly what we need

46:55to be saying. And the truth can be found

46:58found in Jesus Christ.

47:00That's my my foremost belief and I know

47:04that this society and its flourishment,

47:07the greatness and its beauty

47:09comes from that.

47:11You you know, it's it's a cliche, but

47:13you can't have that house without a

47:15strong foundation. It's going to

47:17crumble.

47:19And so,

47:20you know, classic liberalism, we talk

47:22about the Enlightenment, you know, I

47:23think it's you know, like a joke that's

47:25the Enlightenment is where I went wrong.

47:28Um

47:29of course, that's that's partially true,

47:31but the problem with liberalism, maybe

47:34with classical liberalism, is that it

47:36never stays there.

47:38If your

47:40value system, your main value system is

47:42that everything revolves around freedom

47:44and equality,

47:46you know, you only need a couple of bad

47:48actors who are going to tell you exactly

47:51what that is, enforce that down your

47:53throat and say that you can choose

47:56whatever you think is right

47:59and you can just follow that and that

48:00can be at your own whims and that there

48:02is no such thing as the truth. And I

48:05think that's the main issue in the West

48:08is exactly that relativism

48:11that has become dominant as a result of

48:13the loss of God because we are not God.

48:17We cannot decide what the truth is, you

48:21know, like, "Oh, you have your truth and

48:23I have my truth." That's the problem.

48:25Like, we all need to know and our

48:27political establishment, I think, has

48:29totally forgotten that. That they are

48:32not God.

48:35I think for So, this is something that

48:37works on all levels, right? Not just in

48:39politics, it's a personal thing. It's

48:42something that works that way in a

48:43family, all institutions. If you have

48:46people who are God-fearing,

48:49who know what the teachings of Christ

48:51are, deeply live it, then that is the

48:55best type of world that you could have

48:57here on Earth. That that is I think that

49:00is the truth and we've seen that

49:02throughout history. That's where

49:04humanity flourishes.

49:06And so, knowing knowing that we as

49:09individuals are not God, that we are

49:11sinners, but that we can be that we are

49:13forgiven if we turn to Christ

49:17and ask him for that forgiveness.

49:20That

49:21that is not if you really deeply believe

49:23that, that doesn't

49:25that's not a great breeding ground for

49:27dictators, let's say.

49:29Or for

49:31>> [applause]

49:33>> or for people who think that little boys

49:36can become girls or little girls can

49:38become boys or that you can kill a baby

49:41in the womb because you just don't want

49:43it or because maybe it's not the right

49:46time, you know?

49:48And those are the

49:49the

49:50deepest evils that we see in this world

49:52like every single day.

49:55So,

49:56again, I'm

49:57this is for me this is not a that's not

49:59a political speech, you know, I I

50:02as much as I believe that my faith is at

50:04the at the heart of everything I believe

50:07so therefore also my politics,

50:10when I'm asked about it, I don't like to

50:14I don't like to speak and impose as if I

50:17am the one who knows the truth, you

50:19know, I I became a Catholic just a

50:21couple of years ago

50:23and I really would prefer to be on the

50:26humble side in that and not tell people,

50:30you know, exactly how they should live

50:32their lives but I would rather say I'm

50:34not I'm not I don't know everything but

50:37turn turn to those who do don't turn to

50:40the one who does and that's that's

50:41Christ. So, again, this is not a

50:44politically rehearsed answer that I'm

50:46giving you. It's just my personal deep

50:48feelings. They're intimate, you know,

50:50they're

50:51they're my own

50:52but I think that if we were to all do

50:54that and and

50:55be humble in that sense that the world

50:57would be a much much much better place.

51:00If I could just give you a sort of

51:02bumper sticker maybe more simplistic

51:04political answer on that which is that

51:07um I agree actually begrudgingly I've

51:10come to this over the years that

51:11liberalism in and of itself cannot

51:14defend itself and I think that that's

51:16what the progressives realized. They

51:17realized that the soft underbelly of

51:19tolerance that liberals tend to put at

51:21the top of the hierarchy was going to be

51:23the easiest way to usher in all of the

51:25bad things and that really explains the

51:27alliance between the progressives and

51:29the Islamists. You have the people who

51:30are the most you know, quote unquote

51:33progressive allying with the least

51:34progressive people and in all of their

51:36minds it seems to make sense and it's

51:38obviously because the Islamists are are

51:40using the progressives to get into the

51:43system. So, the bumper sticker version

51:45of it would be

51:46to me

51:48liberals need conservatives to guard the

51:51door. Liberals need conservatives to

51:55guard the things that are eternal so

51:57that the whims of the day the crazier

52:00whims of the day things can be pushed

52:02aside and unfortunately liberals from an

52:05American perspective I think and many of

52:07them I think regret it. I think if you

52:09were to talk to Bill Maher was he

52:10probably too harsh on George W. Bush or

52:14on some of the kind of

52:16middle of the road Republicans over the

52:18years for maybe some of their beliefs on

52:20social issues or on religion or

52:22something like that. I think the decent

52:24liberals would probably say yes because

52:26the decent liberals they aren't the ones

52:28that want to have to defend the borders

52:30and make some hard decisions on things

52:32and and that is that may to you is a

52:35critique of liberalism that took me a

52:37long time to realize but I would also

52:39say it's an it's also an argument for

52:41Trump again because Trump really I think

52:44has defended both conservatism and

52:46liberalism in the in at the highest

52:48level that you can do it as an American

52:51politician, you know, he's a

52:52conservative for obvious reasons. Let's

52:54say putting you know, justices on the

52:56Supreme Court who reversed Roe v. Wade.

52:58That's obvious. He's a conservative and

53:00that he's defended the border. Um but

53:02does Trump

53:03does Trump the private man

53:06do you think he's radically against

53:07abortion? The answer probably is no.

53:10Donald Trump was the first incoming

53:12first time president to be for marriage

53:14equality. Not even Barack Obama was.

53:16That's not even an issue in America. So,

53:18Donald Trump has done this incredible

53:21dance to bring together all of these

53:23people and the real question for the

53:25future of American politics is will

53:27anyone be able to do that again?

53:30I'm not so sure what the answer is.

53:33Uh the great Maurice Glasman just your

53:34point British Labour peer says the one

53:37word you never want to hear in an

53:38oncologist's office is progression. Why

53:40should it be the case in politics that

53:41we do want to hear it?

53:43Um ladies and gentlemen, it's now time

53:45for you who have had an hour to think of

53:48wonderful questions for our brilliant

53:50duopoly to put those questions. So, I

53:52think and I hope we have a microphone

53:54somewhere that shall be circulating.

53:57Uh and I shall begin with the uh lady

54:00gesturing vociferously at the top here

54:02and then move down to the left because

54:04we never like to be at the left unless

54:05move to the right after that.

54:09Madam, please.

54:10Thank you so much. Thank you, Melissa,

54:12for uh

54:13this wonderful

54:15Danube Institute. God bless you. My name

54:18is Mona Zaki. I'm a professor of

54:21strategic thinking.

54:23I'm Coptic Orthodox

54:25Egyptian.

54:27I live in Cairo

54:29and I'm really impressed by Eva. God

54:34bless you.

54:36I have to tell you

54:37that

54:39the panel is impressive because as an

54:41Egyptian myself

54:43we live in the middle of the crisis

54:46surrounded by crazy neighborhoods.

54:48So, you can imagine the fire we go

54:50through around starting Gaza, Libya

54:55Syria, please have Syria in your mind.

54:58Iraq, Sudan, Yemen. All this area it's

55:00crazy around. So, my question here when

55:04you say do we really need God?

55:07This is our only way to survive.

55:11I always say

55:12safety is not in the absence of danger.

55:16It's in the presence of God.

55:20This [applause]

55:21Thank you.

55:22This what made Copts live up till now

55:26with the head high

55:28with a very strong martyr history

55:31including the 2015

55:3420 Egyptian martyrs in Libya who

55:37insisted on sticking to the religion,

55:40sticking to Christianity and really

55:42losing their lives after a terrible

55:44torture in modern history. So, my

55:48question is

55:50Trump is doing a great job trying to

55:54save the world against Islamists.

55:58He's doing a great job trying to save

56:00his own country.

56:02But

56:03what about the victims of the wars? What

56:07about those the the Christians in Iran,

56:10the converted Christians in Iran? What

56:13about the

56:14the Christians in Syria who are really

56:16slaughtered down and Syria is moving

56:19moving into this problem like

56:22Taliban and Afghanistan. Syria is in a

56:25really bad shape. What about the

56:27Christians in the Middle East? So, the

56:30Christians in Sudan. So, the Christian

56:32in in Gaza. So, this is as a Christian

56:35myself with a Catholic education of

56:38Orthodox origin

56:41as a real real authentic Copt who comes

56:44from the ancient Egyptians that was

56:46originally a Coptic country before the

56:50uh the Arabs' intervention. So, what

56:53about those Christians around the Middle

56:55East? Are they in their in the minds and

56:58the prayers of the politics the high

57:01leaders' politics? Thank you very much.

57:03Dave, do you want to take that one?

57:05Well, first I would say that the

57:07I I've been to Cairo once. It was 1997

57:10so it was a long time ago and I visited

57:12the Coptic quarter over there and as you

57:14point out I mean there there were

57:16a tremendous amount of Coptic Christians

57:18in Egypt and there's almost nobody left

57:20at least in a in a functioning sense

57:23anymore and I would say Europeans might

57:25want to take that as a warning that what

57:27will happen as you import more people

57:29who will bring in an ideology and a

57:31religion that will subjugate you and

57:33ultimately

57:35either kill you or force you to leave.

57:37So, from a political perspective

57:39everything you said about Trump and I

57:41think his vision is is completely right.

57:43Um there isn't a great discussion about

57:47that happening nationally at the moment.

57:49A little bit with what happened in Sudan

57:51over the last month or two leaked into

57:53the mainstream media.

57:55Um there's a little bit mostly mostly

57:59because Tucker Carlson actually

58:00completely lied about the Christian

58:02situation in Israel and said that they

58:04were diminishing in Israel which was a

58:05100% lie. It's the only place in the

58:07Middle East that Christian numbers are

58:08actually going up. Mostly because he did

58:10that it did shine a light on some

58:12Christian communities in the Middle East

58:14but no, unfortunately it's not top of

58:17mind what's happening across the board.

58:20Uh we should say that one government

58:21that does help the persecuted church is

58:23Hungary with Hungary Helps. As far as

58:25I'm aware the only government department

58:26in the world specifically with that

58:28mission.

58:29Uh

58:30>> [applause]

58:31>> the gentleman in the second row here I

58:33believe was next with his hand up with

58:36the pale coat.

58:44Can I add something about the the

58:45European establishment? Obviously

58:48to the question of the of the woman in

58:49the back.

58:51Sadly

58:52here in Europe our establishment doesn't

58:55even care about the Christians here.

58:58So, you know, and you know this.

59:01So, this is a this is the biggest issue

59:03is that they are the ones actively also

59:06in the documentation of the European

59:08Union in

59:10defining what it means to be European,

59:13they wrote that out. So, I earlier I

59:16earlier I made a joke about the

59:17enlightenment, you know,

59:19they they named the enlightenment.

59:22They talk about that. They talk about

59:24liberalism. They talk about freedom.

59:26They talk about equality. Christianity

59:28was never mentioned once.

59:30It's the foundation of this continent.

59:32You know, so that shows you again, that

59:33shows you their intent, right?

59:36If you take that out,

59:38okay, who do you stand for then instead?

59:41Good evening.

59:42Uh Andre Kolarik, uh Ladislav Hanus

59:44Institute, Slovakia.

59:46Um my question is more specifically to

59:50uh Eva.

59:51Uh you are speaking much about

59:53remigration. Um my question is

59:56if there is a genuine person who wants

59:59to who is from a different continent,

1:00:01wants to come to Netherlands and become

1:00:03Dutch,

1:00:04or wants to come to some other country

1:00:07and become genuinely, I don't know,

1:00:09Frenchman, German, whatever.

1:00:11Um

1:00:12the the current governments don't define

1:00:14it.

1:00:15What would it take

1:00:18for a citizen of, let's say, Oman

1:00:21to become a Dutchman,

1:00:23to be accepted by you as a Dutchman?

1:00:26Thank you.

1:00:27Thank you. I appreciate that question

1:00:29because there is a lot of debate about

1:00:32this going on right now

1:00:34because it's a tricky question for the

1:00:37obvious reason that the

1:00:40the debate right now about what it means

1:00:43to be a Dutchman or what it means to be

1:00:45a Brit, we've seen it in especially now

1:00:48with Restore Britain with Rupert Lowe.

1:00:50There is there are

1:00:52different [snorts] opinions on that,

1:00:53whether that should be only a cultural

1:00:56question. Of course, then you come into

1:00:58the the sphere that say of the um the

1:01:01civic nationalists

1:01:03or if there is also a component of

1:01:06ethnicity, of your ancestry, right?

1:01:09And now that debate has been shunned for

1:01:12as long as we can remember because if

1:01:14you even dared to suggest that yes, also

1:01:18ethnicity

1:01:19is a part, you know, of that equation,

1:01:23then you were branded a white

1:01:25supremacist.

1:01:26Now, obviously, no one is saying that or

1:01:29I am at least not saying that if you are

1:01:32white that you are superior to any other

1:01:34person of any other ethnic background. I

1:01:37am a Christian. I believe that we are

1:01:38all made in the image of God. So,

1:01:40therefore, I would never say something

1:01:42like that or believe it or think it.

1:01:45To the question of what it means,

1:01:47though, to be a Dutchman or a Frenchman

1:01:50or a German, can you become Dutch coming

1:01:54from Oman?

1:01:55I mean,

1:01:56I think if we were turn the question

1:01:58around and, you know, I would like you

1:02:00to think about that maybe as well. I am

1:02:02I am, for example, I'm married to the

1:02:04most wonderful Italian man who's sitting

1:02:05right here.

1:02:08I

1:02:10I could say that I integrated

1:02:13a bit quite well into Italian society. I

1:02:16speak the language. I know all of their

1:02:18gestures, you know.

1:02:20I uh

1:02:22no, I will not incriminate myself now,

1:02:23but

1:02:24>> [laughter]

1:02:24>> you know, I know a thing or two about

1:02:27about Italian culture, let's say. Am I

1:02:29Italian? No.

1:02:32I'm not Italian. But I have the same

1:02:35religion.

1:02:36I'm a Catholic as the leading religion

1:02:39in Italy. I speak the language. I live

1:02:41there. I'm integrated. But I wouldn't

1:02:43call myself Italian because I'm not. I'm

1:02:45Dutch.

1:02:46You know, I was born in the Netherlands.

1:02:48I have ethnically Dutch ancestry for as

1:02:52long as you could probably um go back,

1:02:56we we know that. You know, therefore,

1:02:58I'm Dutch. Does that mean that

1:03:01I should be treated badly or differently

1:03:05in Italy? No.

1:03:07Not if I adapt myself to that society.

1:03:10So, of course, to answer your question

1:03:13once again, there

1:03:15absolutely can be immigration possible

1:03:18from other parts of the world

1:03:21if the people that come choose your

1:03:24society, adapt themselves, and are of

1:03:27benefit to the host land. And the latter

1:03:30is basically not happening with the

1:03:32immigration that we have right now. The

1:03:34doctors and the engineers are not

1:03:35coming.

1:03:36I'm sorry. You know, so, you know,

1:03:39that's the thing. We can have

1:03:41discussions all we want about

1:03:43integration, but it's too late for that.

1:03:45It's too late for that because we let

1:03:47too many people in, and that's why now

1:03:50we are forced, which, you know, if it

1:03:53didn't happen, I would have never had to

1:03:54and I would have never wanted to, but

1:03:56now we are forced to go back to the

1:03:57question, what does it mean to be

1:03:58European? What does it mean to be

1:04:00French? What does it mean to be German?

1:04:02And I do think that your ethnicity plays

1:04:04a role in that.

1:04:05And that we also, as the native people

1:04:08of Europe, and that's why I constantly,

1:04:10you know, reiterate that, have a right

1:04:13to remain the majority in our own

1:04:14country cuz you cannot just magically

1:04:16separate the two completely. It's not

1:04:18realistic. It's not realistic. Doesn't

1:04:21mean that it's not possible for the

1:04:23individual.

1:04:25>> [applause]

1:04:26>> But with the numbers that we are looking

1:04:27at right now,

1:04:29we need to have another type of debate.

1:04:31So, I hope that answers your question

1:04:33enough. Dave. I would just add in in 10

1:04:35seconds, I would say three words to that

1:04:37person, not right now. These countries

1:04:41have to deal with all of their internal

1:04:43issues and let them deal with that first

1:04:45as Eva just pointed out, and then there

1:04:48can be that discussion. But I mean that

1:04:49from an American perspective, too, not

1:04:51right now.

1:04:54Uh the gentleman in the Corvette uh on

1:04:57the top row there.

1:05:00Hi. Uh my name is Eugene Haller and I'm

1:05:02an independent thinker.

1:05:04Um since we're on the subject of

1:05:07censorship, why is it that anybody who

1:05:10questions Israel is automatically

1:05:13considered an anti-Semite?

1:05:17Specifically Tucker Carlson.

1:05:21Well, I don't think anyone is. I'm going

1:05:22to guess that you're not an anti-Semite,

1:05:24but I suspect you question Israel. So,

1:05:26you can have Of course, you can have

1:05:27legitimate

1:05:29uh questions about any nation-state and

1:05:31any leader or anything else. Tucker has

1:05:33done something completely, completely

1:05:36different uh to go to Israel and not get

1:05:38off the plane and ask Mike Huckabee, an

1:05:41evangelical Christian, uh why Israelis

1:05:44shouldn't, like Bibi Netanyahu shouldn't

1:05:46have DNA tests. Uh there's something

1:05:49that maybe is a little anti-Semitic

1:05:51about that. You know, he does a lot of

1:05:53trickery. Al- almost everything Tucker

1:05:54does has become some sort of verbal

1:05:57trickery. One of the things he does when

1:05:58he's criticizing Israel from one side is

1:06:01he'll say the secular state of Israel,

1:06:03implying that it's not a religious

1:06:05state, which it it blends both religious

1:06:08uh nature and and secularism. So, he'll

1:06:11attack it on one side for being secular

1:06:13in in that somehow that it shouldn't

1:06:15have this land because if it's a secular

1:06:17state, they shouldn't be in this place

1:06:18that was promised in the Bible. And then

1:06:21quite literally uh 2 weeks ago on his

1:06:23show, he said that Chabad, which is

1:06:25basically just a Jewish outreach

1:06:27program, he made it uh he basically

1:06:30called them akin to a terrorist

1:06:32organization that was going to blow up

1:06:33Al-Aqsa Mosque to build the Third

1:06:35Temple. So, he wants to hit it from the

1:06:37secular side and the religious side. So,

1:06:40it's one of it's one of those things

1:06:42that it's why anti-Semitism is the

1:06:44oldest hatred, I would say. When Jews

1:06:46have power, people say, "Oh, we hate

1:06:48them cuz they have power." When they

1:06:49don't have power, "Oh, look at them.

1:06:51They're they're less than. They're

1:06:53pathetic." So, it's a it's a constant

1:06:56shell game that he is playing. But

1:06:58believe me, you can criticize Israel.

1:07:00I've been there many times. There's no

1:07:01one that criticizes Israel more than

1:07:02Israelis. So,

1:07:04uh

1:07:05I wouldn't worry about it.

1:07:06>> that is true. Uh

1:07:08in for in in Israel, you can criticize

1:07:10them, but in the United States, when the

1:07:11first thing you say to them, uh you

1:07:14start questioning Israel, all of a

1:07:15sudden out of the woodwork comes

1:07:17everybody piling on.

1:07:19>> think that's more of a I think that's

1:07:20more of a canard than reality. I I think

1:07:23people Yeah, I think people criticize

1:07:26Israel. I mean, look, there's a cottage

1:07:27industry of podcasters right now making

1:07:30a living criticizing Israel, saying, "I

1:07:32can't say this." Then they say it. They

1:07:34make money. They say it again. They make

1:07:36more money. So, I I I don't think it's

1:07:38true. Now, is it possible that the the

1:07:40word or the phrase uh anti-Semitism has

1:07:42been used too much? Sure. Sure. Uh I

1:07:45that's why I try not to attack people's

1:07:47motives. I try to attack uh what they

1:07:49say. So, I I think a a little bit of

1:07:52that is uh I mean, for example, what

1:07:54what would you like to criticize Israel

1:07:56over? Let's see if it's anti-Semitic.

1:07:57>> the thing is that I follow Alan

1:07:59Dershowitz. Yeah.

1:08:00>> And I I follow him.

1:08:02And of course, with the the Kent thing,

1:08:04the first thing is vehemently

1:08:07he it was it was almost vulgar uh the

1:08:10the the podcast that he put out about

1:08:13Kent. And I'm like and I wrote I wrote I

1:08:16I wrote into him and I said, you know,

1:08:17it's like, you know, maybe you should

1:08:19tone it down a little bit. Um

1:08:22but um you know,

1:08:23>> Sure. Well, I can't I can't speak to

1:08:24that comment specifically cuz I I didn't

1:08:26see his show about that. Um but I would

1:08:29say if you want to criticize guys Kent,

1:08:30what should peop- what people should be

1:08:31doing, uh which we shot my show in this

1:08:33very room this morning, what you should

1:08:34be criticizing is that like putting

1:08:37aside that he has completely

1:08:38flip-flopped all his positions on Iran

1:08:40over the years because he was completely

1:08:42behind Trump doing military action in

1:08:44Iran as much as 2 years ago or as little

1:08:46as 2 years ago, that's one thing. Uh but

1:08:48what people should be criticizing him is

1:08:50he likely was a leaker who has been

1:08:52kicked out of White House meetings for

1:08:54months.

1:08:54>> Well, that's the but that's a separate

1:08:55issue. That's likely. We don't have

1:08:57proof of that.

1:08:57>> Sir, I'm going to allow Eva to put the

1:08:59case to Tucker Carlson's defense.

1:09:02Yeah, well, you know, the thing is um

1:09:04this is a very tricky one. And

1:09:09to that I will I will agree with you.

1:09:12I personally know this, for example,

1:09:14because I'm simultaneously called a

1:09:16Zionist

1:09:17and an anti-Semite all of the time.

1:09:21This is true. And I'm not somebody who's

1:09:23particularly outspoken, for example,

1:09:26about that region of the world because

1:09:29as I've told you basically the entire

1:09:31time that we've been talking, I'm

1:09:33someone who focuses on Europe first and

1:09:37on the issues that I actually know a lot

1:09:40about that I have historical ties to,

1:09:43but I do agree with you that it's an

1:09:44extremely explosive subject that also

1:09:47maybe more so maybe in Europe than in

1:09:49America.

1:09:51>> [snorts]

1:09:52>> There are very strong reactions to

1:09:56criticism of even the government of

1:09:59Israel which I think should be allowed

1:10:01and shouldn't be equated to

1:10:03anti-Semitism.

1:10:05Of course,

1:10:06you know, this goes absolutely both

1:10:08ways. Um

1:10:10I see rampant anti-Semitism in Europe

1:10:13and it comes predominantly from people

1:10:15that we have let in in very very very

1:10:18large numbers.

1:10:19Uh it doesn't come from someone like me

1:10:21yet I also get called an anti-Semite

1:10:24by people on the left or people more so

1:10:28in the center and that is that is

1:10:30something that I find problematic. As to

1:10:32Tucker Carlson personally, um he is

1:10:35someone that I've known for many years.

1:10:38I think, you know, I think loyalty is

1:10:40something that is incredibly important

1:10:42in my personal life. I stand by that all

1:10:43the time so you will never hear me say

1:10:45anything bad about him.

1:10:46Um as a man, I think that he has done

1:10:49incredible work also for the

1:10:51conservative movement in America and

1:10:53that on this subject you know, you can

1:10:56have he has strong opinions and you can

1:10:57differ

1:10:59with him, but that's the beauty of I

1:11:01think American society is that you have

1:11:02that that right and it's enshrined in

1:11:05your

1:11:06in your constitution much more

1:11:09than it is here. And by the way, I'll

1:11:11I'll defend that all day long. Tucker

1:11:12and I used to be good friends. He

1:11:13blurred my book. We were on each other's

1:11:15shows all the time. We have

1:11:16and for the record, um I tried to solve

1:11:19a lot of this with him privately before

1:11:22a lot you know, much of this burst forth

1:11:24publicly, but 100% I would back all

1:11:26that. I'm not for Tucker being kicked

1:11:27off YouTube or any other platform. He's

1:11:29welcome to to spout uh you know, his

1:11:32what I think is conspiratorial nonsense.

1:11:34He He can He can He can do it all day

1:11:37long and then it's my right to to uh

1:11:39push back on that with my free speech.

1:11:41All right, but you know, let's get back

1:11:42to that Well, I'm afraid so. We shall

1:11:44get back because We we got a lot of

1:11:45hands here. With regret, ladies and

1:11:47gentlemen, lucisti saltiest

1:11:49all games must end. It is for me to

1:11:52thank you for attending, but most of all

1:11:54for me to thank Eva Vlaardingerbroek and

1:11:56Dave Rubin for this most fascinating

1:11:58evening. Thank you so much.

1:12:00>> [applause]

1:12:05[applause and cheering]

More from The Rubin Report

Recently added transcripts

Browse the whole transcript library

This transcript was generated from the captions YouTube publishes for this video. Get the transcript of any YouTube video atfreeyoutubetranscribe.com, free, unlimited, no sign-up.