Full transcript
0:00King Charles has worked to get away with as much as possible to position the throne so it is not
0:08a casualty when the Islamic takeover happens. Not my words, the words from Dr. Gavin Ashendon,
0:16the Queen's former chaplain. What I am going to share with you in this episode is truly
0:24the biggest royal bombshell I have ever come across. Dr. Gavin shares with me that
0:32Charles has been and will continue to undermine Christianity on purpose working for and with,
0:42as Dr. Gavin claims, the feckless elite. Dr. Gavin believes we are heading towards
0:50a partitioned state and that King Charles set up the UK to seed political Islam.
0:58Dr. Gavin then goes further and watch till the very end because he then discusses the
1:06fact that not only does he think we are heading for civil war and this should be a warning to all
1:13of our friends and allies in the west but that through Charles's permissive role as defender
1:24or non-defender of the faith. This is why we are heading towards civil war. I have never done an
1:34interview like the one I am going to share with you between myself and Dr. Gavin Ashendon. What
1:40makes this interview even more extraordinary is the fact that Gavin has been at the center of
1:48the establishment. We know he was one of the late queen's chaplain. He holds the late queen in very
1:56very high regard. He knew that she always defended the faith. And insiders, you will know I have been
2:03steadfast in my commitment to bringing you the story that many will not discuss. Over time,
2:11Charles has watered down his constitutional oath. He has watered down Christianity. And it is my
2:18belief that wherever in the world you are watching from, this will directly impact you. Watch to the
2:27very end because every single thing Dr. Gavin exclusively reveals to me in this interview
2:36is absolutely mindblowing. And none of which the mainstream media would ever run because Dr. Gavin,
2:46the facts and the truth don't fit the narrative. The trajectory of this was already set. I'm sure
2:54it was set by Charles. Charles has made no secret of this. And uh he's escalated his interest and
3:02uh and the opportunities he's he's given. Um and I I suppose I would say he's I don't like the phrase
3:08done what he can get away with. That sounds a bit a bit bit rude, but I'm I'm sure he's maximized
3:14his opportunities in a way that he hoped would not produce any adverse effects, which is a posh
3:20way of saying the same thing. I I think it's more sinister than that, Gavin. Only Yes. No, I know. I
3:26know you do. And I'm I'm Go explain why you think so. You could be right. Because when you look
3:32back, it's very very calculated from 1993 onwards. And the way he's spoken about Christianity,
3:43I think, is very rude. I feel that each year it's chipped away a little bit. So he's been pushing
3:51Islam up, Christianity down, and now people become outraged a Christmas message when it,
3:59you know, he's speaking about many other faiths. I feel like saying, "Good grief, it's going to be
4:04worse every Christmas because this Charles has very much actually echoed the Fabians and their
4:13slowly slowly approach and that is how I feel. It's sinister. It's not like he's suddenly had
4:20an awakening about Islam. [snorts] All of his movements have coincided with very questionable
4:26meetings with the Qataris and with with the Saudis and we know they are also behind the Muslim
4:32Brotherhood. But Gavin, you know, I've had people on the channel from the royal, [snorts] you know,
4:38other royal presenters who have looked at me like I am [clears throat] nuts when I've spoken
4:44about this. But now, you know, these are the same people that are saying, "Oh, King Charles didn't
4:49know Harry was coming back. He's blindsided." I mean, you can lead a horse to water. I can't
4:54make it drink. But I I feel that Charles is very, very dangerous. Um, that's my belief. And he has
5:02echoed Fabianism, which wants to destroy us. So, so let me disagree with you. I mean, if only to
5:09give our listeners an an enjoyable conversation. What do you mean disagree with me? [laughter]
5:15Well, so I'm I'm about to try and write something that I think puts the same things in context. So
5:20there's something called essentialism. Um there was a while ago when I when I was much more
5:25involved in the in the other side of the philos philosophical stream, so to speak. Um so Lawrence
5:31Vanderost uh was a was a a very interesting man. He he was involved with Kathleen Rain and a and
5:39part of the Yungian culture that saw essentially what they believe is a kind of they have a
5:44philosophy where there's a a single there's a mind behind the universe. It's not the god of the Jews
5:49and and of Jesus Christ. It's a kind of almost like a gnostic god uh and an an intelligence that
5:57um that is bigger than any world religion. It's bigger than the picture of God that
6:02Jesus presents. Rather, it's different bigger and different to Muhammad. Bigger and different to the
6:08the quasi non- good of Buddhism. Essentially, it's a kind of nonaligned uh picture of of a god of the
6:16intellectuals uh that has um and and there's a bit of him in everything. So, you find a bit of this
6:23god in Islam, a bit of this god in Christianity, a bit in Judaism. and and and this is partly
6:29what Jung picked up and ran with and you vent vanderapost and Kathleen Rain are all part of this
6:34and they they have this idea that well there is a god um I mean almost I was going to say go back
6:40to the Freemasons but that's complicated and they have very different pictures depending on where
6:44you are in the degree of things but they like the idea of God but not go a god run by um a religion
6:52with uh affiliations because they're intellect uals. They're bigger than that. It's a God made
6:59in their own image. And essentially, they like a mixture of Islam, Christianity, and Judaism,
7:05and Zoroastriism, and nosticism. It's it's a kind of poperri of godishness that that that
7:13they're on top of, and they're too big to belong. It sounds bloody awful, Gavin. Well, well, it may
7:18sound bloody awful, but it it was exactly what Jung taught and believed and Kathleen Reign did
7:24and Lawrence Vanderpost and Charles fell in with this group. And so I think his view of religion
7:30is he he wants to see a mixture of religions. Uh and this partly involves actually uh undermining
7:38and destroying the claims of Christianity which are non-negotiable. Jesus basically said you
7:45either believe in me or you reject me. You either accept me as God in the flesh come to save you
7:52or I'm wrong and I'm and I'm deceitful. One of the things CS Lewis always said was there's no
7:58middle way with Jesus. He didn't he didn't allow us a middle way. His claims were so absolute that
8:03if you don't accept them, you reject him. And these people do reject Jesus. They do reject his
8:08claims to be the living son of God. They think he they they see him more as a kind of gnostic
8:13figure who had overinflated views of himself or whose followers overinflated but they don't
8:18accept him as as the Christian church has always practiced a relationship with him. So in that
8:24sense Islam is quite useful to the essentialists because it undermines Christianity and presents
8:31uh a a complex religious picture that nobody's in control of but that they get to promote. So I
8:38think this is I I don't think Charles is a Muslim at all in in the sense that he would make himself
8:43accountable to the hadith uh or to the Quran. I think he's above that or these people see
8:49themselves as as beyond a simple religion but they don't like Christianity and they're quite
8:55pleased to be able to to diminish its power. And for those who don't like Christianity, and this
9:00applies to the left as well, the best way of doing it is picking is using Islam because the stronger
9:06you make Islam, the weaker Christianity gets. They don't realize they're dealing with something much
9:11bigger than they can control. I mean, so for example, I I can't well, it's hard to know what
9:17is if and when Islam begins to step up and take political control. I mean my own view is that
9:25we will be partitioned and that um part of the country will become under Islamic political and
9:31cultural control. What will they do with the king then? That makes that just breaks my heart. Well,
9:38it's I think it's it's obvious. I don't see any any alternative. But that's what scares me
9:42because I tr I trust you implicitly with what you think will happen. I I've never, you know, you've
9:50never been wrong. Well, the one of the reasons I say this, and again, I apologize to people
9:55if this sounds um too much to believe um and and it is secondhand in the sense that I'm reporting
10:04what my Muslim colleague said to me. But in about 2005, I was talking to the particular academic who
10:12um who treated me to the inside story uh because he thought I was absolutely on their side and
10:19could be relied on to be sympathetic. Uh and so one of the things that he talked about was I mean
10:25what happened was we had a we had a I planned a big a big symposium at the university. He was the
10:32climactic speaker and he wanted to go home early and so because he didn't want to get caught up
10:37in a traffic jam. He's about 75. So he said, "G I I'm not, you know, we're running behind.
10:42I I don't want to be here for another 3 hours. I want to get home. Put my feet up. So I'm over I'm
10:47going home." I said, "Well, that's that's that's terrible. That that's really pulls the carpet out
10:52from underneath, you know, this this event." Well, he said, "Look," he said. It's a bit like this.
10:57Now I really am quoting because I it's absolutely raised into my memory. He said the thing is I've
11:02been here for 40 years and I've and effectively I've achieved everything I wanted to. I came here
11:08in the 1970s to facilitate the Islamic Republic of Great Britain and I've done it. I can go home now
11:15and put my feet up. And I said like what what do you mean? I mean I had no idea about any of this
11:21stuff just 2005. It's a long time ago. And he said, "Well, the thing is, um, there are about
11:26eight northern connibations where the majority of people under 16 are Muslim." And he said, "So in
11:3320 years time, they'll be voting. And when they vote, they'll vote for Muslim politicians. And
11:39you've kindly helped us enormously by moving the concept of mayor to the center stage of things.
11:44So there will be Muslim mayors. We'll have lots of Muslim mayors. and they'll be voted for and then
11:50they they will have uh there'll be a demographic pressure to um uh to have lots of Muslims and
11:57democratically we will then elect them and we'll ask for Sharia law and we'll have to get Sharia
12:02law because we'll have a demographic mandate and a democratic mandate. So he said, "So confident are
12:09we of this that a group of us have already been to see Tony Blair. Uh or rather we went to see Tony
12:15Blair because he he was no longer in power. And we asked him to seed the political [clears throat] um
12:21these political authorities to Islamic influence because we said um if you do this, you'll be seen
12:28as the politician who made the transfer possible into the Islamic Republic of Great Britain.
12:35you'll be the great hero of it in the same way that other politicians are seen as the kind of
12:40the midwives of the new regime. Um, and if you don't do it, we'll take it anyway without you. So,
12:47so why so why don't you do it? Then then the man, do you know he refused? We're taking it anyway,
12:56but it won't be until 2030. So now the the so the and then that was I then rushed away and
13:02did some googling and discovered that there were indeed five to eight northern connibations where
13:07everyone under 15 the majority was Muslim. And I then realized that there comes a point in 25 years
13:13time when the majority of the of the voters are then Muslim. And when the majority of the voters
13:18are Muslim, they will indeed vote for well first of all mayors but you know soon independent MPs
13:25and then as Hulbeck showed in his book submission in France an Islamic party. We'll have an Islamic
13:32party in the next election almost certainly as the as the stress between Labor and the
13:37independent MPs. So the independent is obviously everyone can see they are the new Islamic party.
13:43People can see that I'm sure they're just calling themselves independent so as not to frighten the
13:47horses. They'll drop the label independent and they'll call themselves the Islamic party of Great
13:51Britain. Um and [laughter] and and then and at that point they'll then say well uh these areas of
13:58the country have have voted for us. So effectively we they will ask for some kind of delegation a bit
14:06like local authority delegation uh for to for Islamic law and Islamic culture. After what's
14:12happening already the Sharia courts are all in full operation. The police are two-tier policing
14:18in favor of Islam. It's all it's all in place. Uh it's just not been formally recognized. So then
14:24the question to my mind is what will the position of the royal family be when that happens? because
14:31parliament is still uh parliament is still in charge and the king is responsible is answerable
14:37to parliament. He's not he's not above parliament. He's under parliament. Well, at that point
14:42Charles I think will say well look I've laid the groundwork for this. I'm king of everybody. I'm
14:46I'm king of Muslims. There's there's been a Muslim element in my coronation. I made it perfectly
14:51clear to everyone. I wanted to include Islam in in in the way I wanted to be king. We don't need to
14:57change anything. They don't they can make a royal oath of of of um uh of obedience to me. They're
15:04they're their their king because I'm an interfaith king. So nothing needs to be changed. The whole
15:09thing's been set up so that at least in terms of the way the crown works and parliament works,
15:14they just seed political power to Islamic culture. And so that's that's what's going to happen.
15:21Now to to my mind when that happens and when I don't know a quarter a third of the country
15:27gets seeded to political Islam I mean all Islam is always political but you know what I mean
15:33I mean it gets gets seeded to Islam to exercise political influence the real question for my mind
15:39is what happens to the nonp part of the of of the Islamic uh part of Great Britain um and you there
15:48we fight for it the the left will want will want some of it. Anglicanism will want some of it. Um
15:55I personally think that the only philosophy and religion that's capable of standing up to Islam
16:00is Catholicism. Catholicism built the west. Catholicism fought Islam at the battle of T,
16:06the battle of Leanto at the gates of Vienna. Um Catholicism understands Islam. I'm just very sorry
16:12that the leaders of of the Catholicism haven't haven't seen the way in which the trajectory is
16:20developing. On on the other hand, maybe they have and they don't feel they can talk about
16:24it because if you talk about it, you might go to prison. Um uh it's it's problematic. But anyway,
16:32um I I don't think Charles needs to be Muslim. He just needs to do exactly what he's done to be an
16:36essentialist to draw to to to act in the name of all religions, diminish the power of Christianity,
16:42raise Islam, and then uh at some point we'll find ourselves in a well effectively um a northwestern
16:50European island that behaves like Lebanon does. Lebanon's had exactly this trouble. uh and and
16:56then we'll have the struggle and the fight and the civil war uh and the that that Lebanon has
17:02as well because that's what happens when you get the mixed religious and political economy that
17:07we have had forced on us. Do you think Charles is aware of what he's doing and what he's done
17:13for so long? Yes, of course. Yes, of course he's completely aware. Of course he is. He's I mean he
17:19may not be the sharpest knife in the box but he's not but nor is he stupid and and he's got lots of
17:24advisers. Um yes I mean one of the things Charles has has pos has done is to position the the the
17:30the throne not to not to become um a casualty of the civil disorder that professor David Betts who
17:41I think is one of the most helpful voices on this has been talking about. So, Professor David Bett,
17:46who's professor of war studies at King's College London, has for the last three or four years,
17:53I think, taken his life into his hands really by being very clear indeed that we that civil war is
18:00inevitable. If you go on to YouTube and you Google him, you'll say that you'll see all his thumbnails
18:05have now moved. Uh so so Bets's I bet Bets's theory is that when he's talking about civil war,
18:12he's not talking about the American situation or the situation in England in the 18th century.
18:19This is an entirely new kind of civil war and it's made up of six stages and he thinks we're
18:23between stages four and five at the moment. Uh and uh that six is just round the corner. Um and so
18:32um and what does stage six look like? Well, stage looks stage six looks like Lebanon. It looks like
18:40um uh it looks like Gaza and Israel. It it it looks like civil it looks like different groups
18:50within society fighting each other on the streets and in and the infra and state infrastructure
18:56being held hostage by one group or another as they destroy it in order to weaken society to
19:02to leave influence. Essentially, it's it's a slow movement into into anarchy with a very
19:10bloody path towards it. And that's I mean, Betts is saying, and I think he's right, that that's
19:16it's now unstoppable. And we will find that's what we'll find ourselves caught up in, I don't know,
19:22anywhere from next week to to five, six, seven years time. I mean it's just unbelievable when
19:29when we also go back and we think we are in this position and largely King Charles has played a
19:41pivotal role in this. Yes, absolutely. He's played a he's played a permissive role in it. Yes. I mean
19:46that's all he needed to do in that. So I mean my great as you know my great criticism of it
19:50were all he needed to do was to keep his oaths. Um uh but but actually I think more was required
19:56of him in fact uh and what was required of him was to defend his people because that's what a
20:03king's basic job is and the two ways in which he should have defended his people in the last
20:095 years since his reign began really effectively were to put his weight behind free speech against
20:16the government to whom he's accountable. I mean again people forget that the government makes
20:20the monarchy. Government chose which family to ask to be king and queen in 1688. They went to
20:27William of Orange and Mary. The government chose to make the monarchy conditional upon supporting
20:32the established Protestant church. Wanted to keep the Catholics out above all. It should have
20:37should have wanted to keep Muslims out, but the Catholics were the four guys then. Um and so um
20:44uh so so Charles's um what he should have done was to defend free speech and defend those with
20:52subjects who were being raped by people who didn't belong in our culture. Um and we know they don't
20:58belong in our culture because they rape the local women. And Betts talks about three groups. He
21:03talks about the effectless elite, Charles, the EU, [clears throat] uh the international financers. He
21:10talks about the nivists. That's us people who live in a place and who can't move because we live here
21:16and we're not rich enough to move if we wanted to. And then of course he talks about Islam.
21:20And so the triangular the triangular conflict is between the feckless elite Islam and the
21:25nativists. And effectively the feckless elite have used Islam and used migration at un unbelievable
21:34levels in order to disaccommodate the nivists, us, uh in order to take our countries from us,
21:40take our communities from us, and to do it in a way just like boiling the frog. There was never
21:46a point at which we would stand up and say we're not we're not having this anymore. And that's and
21:51that's a problem. And so one of the reasons why they they're so ruthless over Southport and why
21:57we've heard nothing more about Am Whitikam's death is because the the the transcript of the
22:02feckless elite mustn't allow us to suddenly say in shock they've taken away our country. They've
22:10taken away our homes. They've taken away our daughters. We're not going to we're not going
22:15to stand for that anymore. That's the point they want to keep postponing as long as possible. And
22:20the difficulty with programs like like yours and voices like mine is that we're saying to people,
22:25look, this is what they're doing to you. Uh when are you going to defend yourselves in some form or
22:31another? So much of the defense that we're doing is by telling the truth. That's that's you know,
22:35you and I can do that. Uh I'm I'm a bit old to to man the barricades at the moment. But but
22:42um on the other hand, I can try and use my what I would call my integrity or my or my my voice or
22:49my insight. Um you're you probably wouldn't be much better on the barricades than I would be,
22:53but you're doing the same thing. You're lending your voice to telling the truth. Well,
22:58um all we can do is tell the truth and hope that people will at some point say to the feckless
23:03elite, "Enough. We're not having this anymore." The problem with Charles is he's on the side of
23:08the feckless elite, not on the nativists, but his coronation promises were made to us. I would love
23:16to hear what you thought of that interview. I have watched it over and over again. And the
23:23reason being is this. Months and months ago, Dr. Gavin told me exactly what would be happening in
23:31the UK. and every prediction he has made has absolutely come to light. I was particularly
23:40interested to hear from Gavin regarding the feckless elite. We know the World Economic Forum,
23:48the World Health Organization, all of these 1% corporate frameworks, they don't work in our
23:57interests. And we know that Charles is heavily in bed metaphorically with them all. So to hear Gavin
24:07so eloquently summarize who the feckless elite are, what they're doing, and how he believes they
24:14are working against us. That was a very sobering takeaway for me. I would love to hear which part
24:22of the interview you found most surprising. And as always, thank you for supporting my journalism.
24:30My aim is always to bring you the full truth and the nuanced conversations that you are never ever
24:38given by your mainstream media. If you are not already subscribed, please hit that subscribe
24:44button. And if you want more of me, head over to my Substack, Lauren the Insider. Thank you.