Free YouTube Transcribe

Video transcript

30分钟带你看懂人民币汇率 | 巴拿马运河理论 | 人民币汇率是如何控制的?#金融 #人民币汇率

跟着大佬学金融 | 老王来了 · 5,371 words · 25 min read

Want to search this transcript, jump the video from any line, or download it as TXT, SRT, or VTT?

Open in the transcript tool

Full transcript

0:00If an expert explains a concept or

0:01something unfamiliar to you , and the

0:03more they talk , the more complicated it

0:05gets — to the point where you can't

0:06grasp it in three days , or even three

0:08years — there are two possibilities .

0:10First , the expert is an idiot who

0:11doesn't understand it themselves ;

0:12they're just reciting textbook jargon ,

0:14knowing the ' what ' but not the ' why , '

0:16which is why they make it so complex .

0:18It’s all just theoretical knowledge .

0:20The second possibility is that the

0:22expert is a crook . They want to scam

0:24you out of your money , keep you paying

0:25tuition , and fool you for a lifetime .

0:27Think of those self-proclaimed Tai Chi

0:29masters ; even if you go to Chenjiagou ,

0:31you'll never learn , and why ? Why is

0:33that ? Either they are stupid , or they

0:36are malicious . There are only these two

0:38possibilities , no third . All major

0:40principles and theories can be

0:42explained simply . As long as someone is

0:44a true master in their field , they can

0:47explain it in a few sentences and make

0:49it clear with just one example .

0:51Everything works this way . To get to

0:54the bottom of the RMB , we must first

0:56look at the current management

0:58mechanism of the RMB exchange rate .

1:01Where does its origin lie ? The origin

1:03actually dates back to the era of Zhou

1:06Xiaochuan and Dai Xianglong ,

1:07specifically the decade between 1995

1:09and 2005 , when the People's Bank of

1:12China and the State Administration of

1:14Foreign Exchange gradually formed a

1:16mature foreign exchange system . The

1:18modern management system currently in

1:21operation did not exist before 1995 .

1:24Before 1995 , the Chinese RMB had a

1:27completely non-convertible settlement

1:30system , known as mandatory settlement .

1:34Mandatory settlement meant that for any

1:37individual , business , or entity —

1:39public or private — if you engaged in

1:42international trade and sold goods ,

1:44whatever currency you received , be it

1:46US Dollars or Japanese Yen , the

1:48People's Bank of China would take it

1:51all and forcibly convert it into RMB at

1:53the official exchange rate . That was

1:56called mandatory settlement . What if

1:58you needed to go abroad to purchase

2:00goods ? If you needed raw materials ,

2:02technical equipment , lathes , machine

2:04tools , or aircraft , you had to get

2:06foreign currency , and people wouldn't

2:07sell to you otherwise . You had to apply

2:10for foreign exchange and get approval

2:11before you could exchange it . For

2:13individuals going abroad , if you wanted

2:15to exchange currency — for example , as

2:17a government-sponsored student — you

2:19needed an application for the state to

2:21release foreign currency to you . For an

2:23ordinary person , it was basically

2:25impossible . So , in that era before 1995

2:27, what did individuals do when going

2:29abroad ? In Beijing , there was a place

2:32called Chenmen . Somewhere on that

2:34street near Fuchengmen — I forget if it

2:36was inside or outside the gate — within

2:38a range of a few kilometers , there was

2:40a Bank of China branch . That branch was

2:42the biggest hub for black-market

2:44currency exchange . Before 1995 , and

2:46even up to 2000 , these people who

2:48swapped currency were all authentic

2:50locals from Beijing . They were like

2:53street punks ; today , we would call them

2:55marginalized members of society . But

2:57they earned a lot of money . Because

2:59they had access to channels for foreign

3:01currency . If the People's Bank of

3:03China's official rate was , say , 1 to

3:068.5 , you could get 1 to 9 or even 1 to

3:0810 from them . They would exchange money

3:11with you at a spread much higher than

3:13the official rate . You’d give them

3:16RMB , and they would hand you cash US

3:18dollars on the spot . That’s what we

3:20called " cutting " or swapping currency .

3:22If you walked down the street near that

3:24branch , within about 100 to 200 meters ,

3:26there were many of them — just like

3:27ticket scalpers — asking , " Need foreign

3:29exchange ? " " Need US dollars ? " Now , you

3:32could say this business was illegal .

3:34But everyone knows that " illegality " is

3:36just like the saying : the commoners

3:38can’t light a lamp , but the officials

3:39can set the whole place on fire . These

3:41currency scalpers were all in cahoots

3:43with the local police station and

3:45organized crime , so essentially , no one

3:47ever bothered them . During " strike hard

3:49" campaigns , they would hide , but once

3:51it passed , they’d be back at it every

3:54day . The police would definitely

3:56collect protection money , and because

3:58these scalpers and currency swappers

4:00were illegal and operated underground ,

4:03they often pulled some nasty tricks .

4:05For instance , they would use sleight of

4:07hand like a magic trick . You’d

4:09exchange 1,000 dollars , they’d count

4:10it out right in front of you , but when

4:11you got home and counted it yourself ,

4:12it might be 200 or 800 . Some would be

4:14missing . Or they would hand you

4:16something that looked like US dollars ,

4:18but turned out to be Nigerian or

4:20Ethiopian currency that resembled them .

4:22Since not many Chinese spoke English or

4:25knew what dollars looked like back then

4:27, people were often cheated . You would

4:30often see this in the newspapers . This

4:33was the reality of China’s foreign

4:35exchange system at the time , because

4:37the people were bound to the land by

4:40strict exit and passport controls ,

4:42restricted to their local areas , unable

4:44to move freely , let alone travel abroad

4:47. Therefore , the people had no real

4:50need to exchange foreign currency . So ,

4:52for the whole of Beijing — Beijing is

4:54still the center — and the southern

4:56centers are undoubtedly Guangzhou and

4:58Shanghai . Looking at the data , I

5:00believe the daily personal demand for

5:01foreign currency exchange in Beijing ,

5:03Shanghai , and Guangzhou combined does

5:05not exceed $ 100,000 . Beijing alone

5:07won't exceed $ 100,000 , nor will

5:09Shanghai or Guangzhou . This means that

5:11for all of China , based on the data ,

5:13the daily volume of personal foreign

5:15exchange won't exceed $ 300,000 . You

5:18might ask where this data comes from .

5:20I’m estimating it , but it’s

5:22definitely reliable . If any of my

5:23viewers or their fathers were currency

5:25brokers , they would know it’s

5:27accurate . Why ? Because the most an

5:29average person exchanges in a day or at

5:31one time is a few thousand dollars at

5:33most . If a big player said they wanted

5:35to exchange $ 50,000 in Beijing in one

5:37day , I’m not joking — the currency

5:39brokers across the entire city might

5:41not even have $ 100,000 on hand . If you

5:43try to exchange $ 50,000 , it would

5:45actually affect the black market

5:47exchange rate . So , the total daily

5:49personal exchange volume across these

5:51three major cities and all of China

5:53definitely won’t exceed $ 300,000 ;

5:55it’s likely far lower . It could even

5:58be as low as $ 30,000 . The total volume

6:00for all of China is just that small .

6:01Why ? Either people are using official

6:04channels . Or , it's just individual

6:06students studying abroad . Back in the "

6:09Beijingers in New York " era , students

6:11like Wang Qiming would leave with only

6:14$ 400 or $ 500 in their pockets . They

6:16couldn't even scrape together $ 1,000

6:19or $ 2,000 . It’s not like today ,

6:21where people think you can’t go

6:23abroad without a million dollars .

6:24That’s not the concept at all , which

6:26is why my younger viewers might not

6:28understand . It’s like how you can

6:30travel to Thailand or the Maldives now

6:32and just swipe your UnionPay card — how

6:35elegant and normal that seems . The fact

6:37that UnionPay is accepted worldwide is

6:39actually a very recent phenomenon , with

6:41a history of less than 20 years . How

6:43did people go abroad before that ?

6:45Before , you used traveler’s checks ,

6:48cash , or you would go abroad and then

6:50apply for a local bank card . If you

6:53tried to apply for a credit card , they

6:55simply wouldn’t give you one .

6:57Applying for a credit card at a major

6:59domestic commercial bank — like Bank of

7:02China or CITIC Bank , which were among

7:04the first to handle foreign exchange —

7:06they were the ones that had the

7:08earliest co-branded Visa and Mastercard

7:10with UnionPay . But back then , the

7:14requirements for being issued a Visa or

7:17Mastercard were extremely high . It

7:20wasn't like just anyone could get one .

7:23If you had a W-card or a M-card back

7:25when we old-timers hung out at the

7:27Kunlun Hotel , you’d have so much face

7:29— even the waitresses would want to

7:31give you their phone numbers . That’s

7:34no exaggeration at all ; this was only

7:36twenty years ago . So , I say in the era

7:39of Dai Xianglong and Zhou Xiaochuan ,

7:41the People's Bank of China faced the

7:44issue of how to handle massive foreign

7:46exchange reserves . I mean , from the

7:49time China truly opened up — post - 1990

7:51— to joining the WTO in 2000 , during

7:54that decade from 1990 to 2000 , " Made in

7:57China " evolved from shoes and shirts to

8:00more complex goods . With massive

8:03exports came huge amounts of foreign

8:05exchange that the People’s Bank had

8:08to settle , pushing our reserves to 100

8:11billion , 200 billion , 300 billion , and

8:14even 400 billion US dollars . This was

8:16unprecedented ; we used to have only

8:19tens of billions or even less , so we

8:21had never seen figures like 100 or 200

8:23billion dollars before . They were real

8:27country bumpkins back then — the

8:28People’s Bank of China had no foreign

8:31exchange function ; it was managed by

8:33the Bank of China , which was a

8:35commercial bank , until we hit those

8:37hundreds of billions . Only then did

8:39they realize a commercial bank couldn't

8:41handle it , so the central bank took

8:43back the power and established the

8:45State Administration of Foreign

8:46Exchange . The SAFE was a department

8:48extracted from the commercial structure

8:51of the Bank of China to manage things

8:53centrally . Under this system , every

8:55commercial bank could handle foreign

8:56exchange businesses , but all were

8:58managed uniformly by the SAFE . How did

9:00they manage it ? Actually , they had no

9:02experience ; in the beginning , it was

9:04mainly just foreign exchange settlement

9:05. But as I’ve said , you all know the

9:07result of settling forex is that you

9:09end up with more and more foreign

9:10currency , because , damn it , it’s all

9:12been settled into your accounts . Since

9:14you’re holding onto all this cash ,

9:16you have to put it to use ; you have to

9:18spend it because you’re a bank —

9:20otherwise , you’d have to pay interest

9:22on those deposits . If you don't use it ,

9:24what can you do ? You buy US Treasury

9:26bonds ; it’s the simplest way , which

9:29is why China became the largest

9:31purchaser of US debt , forming a pattern

9:33that has continued ever since . Around

9:361998 , a major event occurred : the Asian

9:39Financial Crisis . That had nothing to

9:42do with China ; the crisis began when

9:43Thailand suddenly abolished the Thai

9:45baht’s peg to the US dollar , causing

9:47the baht to plummet and triggering a

9:49wave of currency devaluations across

9:51Asia . At that time , Soros had a very

9:53keen sense of smell for this , so he

9:55took down the Thai baht in one fell

9:57swoop , and then the Philippine peso .

9:59Soros then turned his sights to Hong

10:01Kong , aiming to break its linked

10:03exchange rate system between the US

10:05dollar and the Hong Kong dollar . Once

10:07broken , because Thailand only announced

10:09it was unpegging after he broke them —

10:10otherwise , he would have bought up all

10:12of Thailand's US dollar foreign

10:13exchange reserves ; after all , you were

10:15pegged , weren't you ? So that is why he

10:17went to break it . By the same logic , he

10:19could break Hong Kong , because Hong

10:21Kong didn't have too many foreign

10:22exchange reserves either . So Soros did

10:24the math : he leveraged his way into

10:25Hong Kong , selling off Hong Kong

10:27dollars to buy up US dollars . Just how

10:29many US dollars does the Hong Kong

10:30government have ? With your linked

10:32exchange rate , you are obligated to

10:33sell to me at this price . I will keep

10:35buying , buying , buying , until you can't

10:37hold on , you run out of dollars , and

10:38you announce a de-pegging . Then , the

10:40Hong Kong dollar rate crashes , and I

10:42eat you alive . This was Soros's main

10:44strategy when attacking Hong Kong at

10:46the time . When the Hong Kong dollar was

10:48under attack , the central government

10:50attached great importance to it . Those

10:52in charge at the time were Jiang Zemin

10:53and Zhu Rongji ; both were from Shanghai

10:55and understood some economics , but they

10:57didn't understand foreign exchange . How

10:59could Jiang Zemin understand it ? And

11:02Zhu Rongji didn't either . So , Jiang and

11:04Zhu urgently notified the People's Bank

11:06to report to them on exactly what was

11:08happening in Hong Kong . We had just

11:10taken back Hong Kong for less than a

11:11year . If the Hong Kong dollar became a

11:13useless currency like the Thai baht ,

11:14then the Chinese Communist Party's " one

11:16country , two systems " would have failed

11:17. How could it be so good when it was

11:19in the hands of the British , but end up

11:21in shambles as soon as it reached the

11:22hands of the Communist Party ? So , Jiang

11:24and Zhu took this matter very seriously

11:26and notified the People's Bank to

11:28report . The entire People's Bank

11:30couldn't find anyone who understood it ,

11:32and even Zhou Xiaochuan didn't really

11:34grasp it . But Zhou Xiaochuan knew who

11:36did — a man named Yi Gang , who

11:38eventually became Zhou Xiaochuan's most

11:40valued successor . He was a cadre being

11:42groomed for important roles because Yi

11:44Gang had returned from studying in the

11:46United States . During his studies , Yi

11:48Gang had genuine contact with the

11:50Federal Reserve and top American

11:52economists . Jiang Zemin gave them half

11:54an hour to explain it clearly . Jiang

11:56Zemin and Zhu Rongji listened to them

11:59together . It terrified those two guys ,

12:01but Yi Gang and Zhou Xiaochuan were the

12:03ones who truly understood . They

12:04explained it to old Jiang in just 20

12:06minutes . I don't know how they

12:08explained it , because I only heard this

12:09story after they came back , feeling

12:11quite triumphant . Old Jiang made the

12:12decision right then and there ; Old Zhu

12:13and Old Jiang agreed together to back

12:15Hong Kong and support Hong Kong . After

12:16they finished speaking , Jiang asked a

12:18question , and they both knew he

12:20understood . Jiang asked in his Shanghai

12:22dialect , " So , all this back and forth ,

12:23does it just come down to who has more

12:25money ? " " So , in the end , do we have more

12:28money or does Soros have more money ? "

12:30Yi Gang made precise calculations .

12:33Soros was using leverage , but we could

12:35use leverage too . Moreover , our

12:37principal was far greater than his ; our

12:40leverage could exceed his many times

12:42over . Then Jiang said , " Let's give it a

12:45go . " " We must win . " A decision was made

12:48right then . Jiang Zemin and Zhu Rongji

12:50heard the reports from Yi Gang and Zhou

12:52Xiaochuan and understood everything .

12:53This was what Soros hadn't anticipated .

12:56He thought that with the Communist

12:57Party's few hundred billion in foreign

12:59reserves — about 400 billion at the

13:00time — they would be reluctant to use

13:01it . He didn't think they would actually

13:03take it out . Furthermore , he believed

13:05the mainland and Hong Kong financial

13:06systems were separate , so he didn't

13:08prepare the ammunition for that front ,

13:09and his forces were wiped out . If Soros

13:11were born in today's era and tried to

13:13attack Hong Kong , if the Soros of that

13:15decade were in today's world , perhaps

13:16he would have won . But Soros is old now

13:19, and that era has passed . So , that

13:21time in Hong Kong , Soros basically lost

13:23all the money he had earned in Thailand

13:25, along with his own assets . That

13:27single blow made Soros very difficult

13:30to deal with . After Yi Gang and Zhou

13:32Xiaochuan gained the full trust of

13:34Jiang and Zhu , it was because they were

13:36pragmatists who understood American

13:38rules and could speak in a way that

13:40Americans understood . That is why Zhou

13:43Xiaochuan was able to hold the helm of

13:45the People's Bank of China for 15 , or

13:47even 16 years , making him the

13:49longest-serving central bank governor

13:51in the history of the Republic and

13:53China . Otherwise , given his background

13:55— his father , Zhou Jiannan , was only a

13:56ministerial-level official — there was

13:58no reason he could have served for over

14:00a decade and eventually retired at the

14:01vice-national rank . In the position of

14:03central bank governor , it is very

14:05difficult to reach such a height .

14:07Xiaochuan became famous in that one

14:09battle under the Zhu and Jiang

14:11administration , establishing his

14:13absolute technical authority . Under the

14:16governance of experts like Zhou and Yi ,

14:19who were equipped with purely

14:20American-style training , they managed

14:23the People's Bank of China's foreign

14:25exchange reserve system . This was the

14:29so-called " pool theory " that Xiaochuan

14:31later promoted externally , which is the

14:33Panama and Management Bureau theory I

14:36mentioned to you . To put it simply ,

14:38this theory is actually quite

14:40straightforward : it means taking the

14:42previous system of mandatory foreign

14:44exchange settlement by the People's

14:46Bank of China and placing it into a

14:47relatively freer " pool . " In the past ,

14:50every single transaction was settled

14:52precisely for you . All currency usage ,

14:54receipts , and purchases required

14:56individual approval for each

14:57transaction . But as China's economic

15:00scale grew , its GDP increased , and

15:02foreign trade surged , this management

15:04style became outdated , wasteful of

15:06human and financial resources , and

15:08technically difficult to implement . So ,

15:11what could be done ? They simply opted

15:13for a closed environment ; I stop caring

15:15about the details and only manage the

15:17inflow and outflow of this pool —

15:19controlling the total volume . As for

15:21this black box , I don't care what

15:23happens inside it . First , I still

15:25strictly regulate capital-account RMB ,

15:28but for trade-account RMB — that is ,

15:30import and export-related currency — I

15:32basically only manage the total inflow

15:35and total outflow of this pool . As long

15:37as the total inflow and outflow remain

15:40unchanged , I adopt a relatively free

15:42market pricing for the RMB exchange

15:44rate within this pool . I don't announce

15:47daily prices myself ; instead , several

15:49overseas market makers in Hong Kong ,

15:51along with a few authoritative

15:53institutions under the People's Bank of

15:56China , automatically form a

15:58semi-marketized daily RMB exchange rate

16:00quote . That is basically the status quo

16:03. The current RMB exchange rate market

16:05quoting system is based on market

16:07makers , and these market makers are

16:08actually " Central Mom , " the People's

16:10Bank of China . The officials at the

16:12People's Bank of China are very savvy

16:14about this . Under this sophisticated

16:16management system — this very

16:18reasonable and scientific management

16:20system — the People's Bank of China's

16:21foreign exchange system and its

16:23mechanisms are the most advanced . Apart

16:25from the U.S. Federal Reserve , it is

16:27the most advanced in the world , and it

16:29is completely different from the Fed .

16:31The Federal Reserve can regulate the

16:34global foreign exchange market , but it

16:36cannot control the RMB in China . I once

16:38nicknamed the People's Bank of China in

16:41my early blog posts as the " Federal

16:44Reserve's Beijing Office . " I gave them

16:47that name , and later , some of those old

16:50leaders even accepted it themselves .

16:52Why didn't Greenspan bother Zhou ? It's

16:55because of their mutual synergy ; the

16:57U.S. also wanted China to have such a

16:59pool . It’s beneficial and harmless

17:01for the U.S. , China , and Wall Street .

17:03Therefore , everyone has a tacit

17:05understanding , which formed this model

17:07where " the U.S. allows China to

17:08maintain its own private army . " So , the

17:10comprehensive RMB buffer pool

17:12management system established by Zhou

17:15Xiaochuan was very scientific and

17:17reasonable , operating until the 2010s ,

17:19reaching its peak in 2012 and 2013 .

17:22Before appearing out of thin air , this

17:25operation was so incredible that they

17:28even started giving the People's Bank

17:30of China top management the position of

17:33Deputy Managing Director at the IMF ,

17:35granting the RMB reserve currency

17:38status . This was something you couldn't

17:40obtain without going to war in the past

17:42; how would they give a Chinese person

17:44the number two spot at the IMF during

17:46peacetime ? How could they let a Chinese

17:48person hold that role ? How is that even

17:50possible ? Who do you think you are ? But

17:52the leaders of the People's Bank of

17:55China did indeed become top leaders ,

17:57rotating leaders , at the IMF during

18:00those years , around 2011 , 2012 , and

18:022013 . A major breakthrough for the

18:05internationalization of the currency .

18:07And for the average person , because

18:09this pool was growing larger and more

18:12abundant — I remember back in 2013 and

18:142014 . It had already surpassed $ 4

18:17trillion in total foreign exchange

18:19reserves ; of course , the buffer wasn't

18:21that large , but a $ 4 trillion total

18:23foreign exchange reserve is still quite

18:26a significant buffer . The cash portion

18:28of US dollars in the pool was at least

18:30several hundred billion , making the

18:32People's Bank of China absolutely the

18:33wealthiest institution in the world . So

18:35many foreigners wanted to follow you ,

18:37fawn over you , and borrow from you

18:39through financial means . The People's

18:42Bank of China felt good about itself

18:45too , so that era , around 2013 , was

18:47China's most open period . People could

18:50freely exchange $ 50,000 annually with

18:52just their ID , and without needing a

18:55reason ; any Chinese citizen just had to

18:57say " I want to travel abroad " at a bank

18:59window to get that $ 50,000 . In that

19:02era , underground banks in places like

19:04Vancouver and Los Angeles had to keep

19:06their fees very low , because it was so

19:09easy for regular people to exchange

19:11currency that underground banks had no

19:13profit margins . They could only add one

19:16percent or 1.5 percent . What does this

19:19mean ? With so much money in RMB , the

19:22U.S. hoped that the RMB would

19:24appreciate . Because the Americans

19:26understood that once the RMB

19:27appreciates , your trade competitiveness

19:29is no longer as strong , and the speed

19:31at which dollars flow into China would

19:33not be as fast . The U.S. didn't want

19:35China to grow too large , so they

19:37exerted mild pressure for the Renminbi

19:39to appreciate . The " Beijing office of

19:41the Federal Reserve " in China was very

19:43cooperative with this mild appreciation

19:45. If you ask me to rise by 1 , I rise by

19:470.1 , " Dad , " I won't make you lose face ,

19:49I've risen , and " Dad " was very

19:51understanding , " Okay , good son , rise by

19:53another 1 , " " Okay , I'll rise by another

19:550.1 . " Just like that , the RMB to USD

19:57exchange rate climbed step by step from

19:58over 1 : 7 to 1 : 5 . Wait , was it 1 : 5 ? 1

20:01: 6 ? Over 1 : 6 ? At its peak , the RMB

20:05reached over 1 : 6 , did it ever break

20:07through to 5 point something ? I forget ,

20:09it seemed to break through 6 for a

20:12moment . I’ve forgotten , but those

20:14interested can look up the RMB's peak

20:16against the USD in 2017 or 2018 . Under

20:19the management of Zhou Xiaochuan and Yi

20:21Gang's " Pool Theory , " the Renminbi

20:23formed its own automatic adjustment

20:25mechanism . This mechanism could

20:27actually have functioned very well , to

20:29the point that Alibaba and Tencent both

20:32started opening overseas payment

20:34services for Alipay and WeChat , because

20:36they also wanted a slice of the

20:38overseas payment pie . This means that

20:40every Chinese person living in

20:42Vancouver can use their own Alipay ,

20:44even today , at places like T & T

20:46Supermarket or Chinese restaurants .

20:49When paying for a meal , you just scan

20:51the code , exactly like in China , and

20:53boom , it settles the bill directly at

20:56the current exchange rate . However , the

20:59restaurant owner or the T & T owner

21:01doesn't receive Renminbi ; they have it

21:03converted into Canadian dollars or US

21:06dollars by China's foreign exchange

21:08management department . This means that

21:10the People's Bank of China must have

21:12enough US dollars in its " pool " to be

21:15able to do this . So today , when I talk

21:16to everyone about " Financial Censorship

21:18, " it's that the moment Taobao and

21:20WeChat stop overseas payments , when

21:21overseas retail payments stop , your "

21:23Financial Censorship " is triggered . Why

21:25? Let the data speak for itself . Taking

21:28Canada as an example , the largest

21:30Chinese supermarket that accepts Alipay

21:32and WeChat Pay is the biggest merchant

21:34called T & T Supermarket . T & T has about a

21:36dozen , fewer than 20 large supermarkets

21:39across Canada , and its total annual

21:41sales are roughly in the range of 1

21:43billion to 2 billion Canadian dollars

21:46— within that 1 to 2 billion range per

21:49year . This is the largest Chinese

21:50supermarket chain in Canada , and its

21:52revenue won't exceed 2 billion Canadian

21:54dollars . Because it's a public company ,

21:56it was acquired by Loblaw , that is , the

21:58owner of Superstore . T & T is the largest

22:01Chinese customer base ; no other Chinese

22:03retail group or sales unit has a higher

22:06overseas transaction volume than T & T .

22:08That is to say , T & T has a maximum

22:10annual revenue of 1 to 2 billion CAD ,

22:13and it's impossible for all of that to

22:15be paid via WeChat Pay or Alipay . Most

22:18customers are still local Canadians .

22:20For example , we use local Canadian

22:22credit cards or debit cards to pay ; we

22:25wouldn't use RMB for these payments .

22:28Let me put it this way : according to

22:30scientific statistics , about a third or

22:32a quarter of customers use WeChat Pay

22:35or Alipay , while the rest pay with

22:37local Canadian currency . If a quarter

22:39of the annual sales is 2 billion — and

22:42that’s an upper limit — at 2 billion

22:44a year , what is a quarter of that ? A

22:46quarter is 500 million CAD , meaning the

22:49total annual demand for RMB foreign

22:52exchange for all T & T stores in Canada

22:55is only about 500 million CAD . Los

22:57Angeles is about the same , though the

22:59retail food and beverage sector is

23:01actually smaller than the grocery

23:03sector . Even if we estimate the dining

23:05sector as equal to T & T , it still

23:07wouldn't reach 500 million CAD , because

23:09Chinese restaurants in Canada aren't on

23:11that scale . Let's be generous and say 1

23:14billion CAD , which covers the entire

23:16Canadian demand . The US is ten times

23:18the size of Canada , but the number of

23:20Chinese in the US and Canada is about

23:22the same , so let's be generous and

23:24double the US estimate . That would be 2

23:26billion USD for the US . With 2 billion

23:29USD for commercial retail and dining

23:32demand for RMB payments , 3 billion USD

23:34for the US and Canada combined is more

23:37than enough . You couldn't even spend 3

23:39billion USD ; Europe , Japan , and Oceania

23:41combined would total less than 5

23:43billion USD for the entire year . So ,

23:45for China's foreign exchange reserve

23:48pool and the administration , don't you

23:50think 5 billion USD is just a drop in

23:53the bucket ? Exactly , it’s like a

23:55little finger ; it has no real impact on

23:58the whole , but it gives you a very good

24:01feeling . That’s why all Chinese

24:03people feel that the motherland is so

24:05powerful . The motherland is amazing ; I

24:07can now use WeChat Pay and Alipay to

24:09buy things in Canada whenever I want .

24:11I’m so awesome . It gives you this

24:14illusion , making you feel particularly

24:16secure inside . So this $ 5 billion is

24:18money well spent , and it accounts for

24:21less than 5 % of their total capital

24:24regulation pool , so they absolutely

24:26should pay it because it yields returns

24:29ten times over , not just a tenth . It

24:31can have a hundredfold effect in

24:33boosting confidence , establishing faith

24:35in the RMB overseas , and strengthening

24:38the cohesion of overseas Chinese . It

24:40buys the support and confidence of

24:42overseas Chinese in their motherland ,

24:45so when they can no longer pay this $ 5

24:47billion , it’s the first thing they

24:50cut — but why ? This $ 5 billion is

24:52purely for show and is dispensable , so

24:54they will certainly cut it first ; once

24:57this $ 5 billion is cut , it shows they

24:59are in big trouble . They can’t even

25:01coordinate $ 5 billion in cash — and

25:04this is over a year , not just a day —

25:06so we can accurately conclude that the

25:09RMB can't hold up , and this pool must

25:11absorb more US dollars and foreign

25:14exchange . Therefore , the RMB must be

25:17devalued . Devalued to the next order of

25:19magnitude , the next level down ; it’s

25:20like losing one defensive line and

25:22retreating to the next . Because once

25:24the RMB devalues , the export

25:25competitiveness of all goods

25:26strengthens again , a large amount of

25:27foreign exchange flows in , and once

25:29it's in , there’s water in their pool

25:30again , so that’s how they manage it

25:32in stages . Did everyone understand ?

25:34This is the RMB exchange rate , broken

25:36down and explained in detail . Leave

25:37plenty of comments , goodbye .

Recently added transcripts

Browse the whole transcript library

This transcript was generated from the captions YouTube publishes for this video. Get the transcript of any YouTube video atfreeyoutubetranscribe.com, free, unlimited, no sign-up.