Free YouTube Transcribe

Video transcript

ALAA Summer Book Launch Event - Alfredo Jaar: Decolonial Time and the Aesthetics of the Unfinished

Association for Latin American Art · 11,380 words · 52 min read

Want to search this transcript, jump the video from any line, or download it as TXT, SRT, or VTT?

Open in the transcript tool

Full transcript

0:07Okay, welcome everyone.

0:10As people are signing on and settling

0:13in, I just uh want to thank everyone for

0:16your patience. I know we're a few

0:18minutes after the hour. We are just

0:21trying to connect to the audio for Lucy

0:24Lupard and it's just taking a few

0:26minutes. We're still working on it, but

0:28we will get it all set up uh

0:30momentarily. And in the meantime, we're

0:33going to go ahead and get started.

0:36All right. Um

0:38well, welcome.

0:43And on behalf of the Association for

0:45Latin American Art, known as ALA, I want

0:49to extend a very warm welcome to our

0:52members, to everyone who's joining us

0:54today. Um, thank you all so much for

0:57being here. We have a wonderful program

0:59in store for you. Um, my name is Lesie

1:03Wolf. I'm the president of ALA and it's

1:06my great pleasure to welcome you to this

1:08third and final program in this year's

1:10book launch summer series. These virtual

1:13events are an opportunity for us to

1:15celebrate the breadth of new scholarship

1:17being published by our members and to

1:20engage in dialogue about how their

1:22research expands Latin American art

1:24history in exciting new directions. If

1:27you weren't able to join us for the

1:29first two book launches that we had uh

1:31previously this summer, I warmly invite

1:34you to watch the recordings on our new

1:36YouTube page. And I really hope that

1:38you'll take a moment to subscribe and

1:40stay a breast of all the resources that

1:42we'll continue to add to the page. And

1:45if you're not already a member of Allah,

1:47I encourage you to join the association.

1:50Um we offer various programs virtual and

1:52in person throughout the year in

1:54addition to networking opportunities and

1:56many awards. And coming up this October

1:598th through 11th, our 7th trienal

2:02conference will be taking place at the

2:04University of Washington in Seattle. I'm

2:07also going to share a link to that in

2:09our chat in case you're interested in

2:12joining us. The conference is free to

2:14attend. Um, and everyone is very warmly

2:19invited. Um, we have a wonderful program

2:22lined up that includes keynote lectures

2:24from art historian Ananda Kona Ponte and

2:26artist Shory Manaya and a host of uh,

2:29wonderful presentations from our

2:31members. But we're here today to

2:34celebrate the final book launch event in

2:36our summer series. And we are honored to

2:38feature the new monograph Alfredo Jar

2:41decolonial time and the aesthetics

2:43[clears throat] of the unfinished which

2:44was published very recently by Duke

2:47University Press just last month in July

2:50by art historian Florencia San Martin

2:52who joins us today. And we invite you to

2:54purchase the book directly from Duke

2:56using the coupon code that I will also

2:59share in the chat in just a moment. and

3:01that will save you 30% off of the book's

3:04uh price. So, I'll introduce Florencia

3:07and other panelists in just a moment,

3:10but first I briefly want to just

3:13overview the program. We'll begin with a

3:15presentation by the author, Florencia

3:18Martin, followed by a conversation with

3:21our esteemed panelists. We have Lucy

3:23Leard and Maris Vila Badama joining us

3:27today. And then at the end, we'll open

3:29it up to discussion. um with the

3:31audience, a Q&A session. And so we

3:34encourage everyone to share questions,

3:37comments, thoughts in our chat

3:40throughout the program. Um and we'll

3:42return to those questions at the end of

3:45our program for the Q&A. Um and now let

3:49me introduce our speakers.

3:52Florencia San Martin is assistant

3:54professor of art history at Lehigh

3:56University. She's the author of Alfredo

3:59Jar, Decolonial Time and the Aesthetics

4:01of the Unfinished, the book we'll

4:03discuss today, and co-editor of the

4:05volumes The Rutled Companion to

4:07Decolonizing Art History, published in

4:102024, and Dismantling the Nation:

4:13Contemporary Art in Chile, published by

4:15Amherst College Press in 2023.

4:19She's also the editor of Somosia

4:25Gulp, the catalog accompanying the

4:27exhibition she co-curated in 2023 at the

4:31invitation of the Chilean government to

4:33commemorate the 50th anniversary of the

4:35military coup. Lucy R. Leard is a

4:39freelance writer, activist, and sometime

4:41curator, author of 30 books, including

4:44an experimental novel and a fiction

4:47collection. Among them are Ava Hessa,

4:50Six Years, Overlay, Contemporary Art and

4:53the Art of Prehistory, Mixed Blessings,

4:56New Art in a Multicultural America,

4:58Partial Recall, Photographs of Native

5:01North Americans, The Lore of the Local,

5:04Senses of Place in a Multi-ensor

5:06Centered Society, Down Country, The Tano

5:09of the Galiso Basin, 1250 to 1782, and

5:13most recently, Undermining, a wild ride

5:16through land use, politics, and art in

5:18the changing west and stuff instead of a

5:21memoir. She's also co-founder of several

5:24activist artist organizations including

5:27heresies, printed matter, political art

5:30documentation distribution, artists call

5:32against US intervention in Central

5:34America and impact art lab. And for 29

5:38years she has edited the monthly

5:39newsletter Elent de Galisto for the

5:42rural New Mexico village where she has

5:45lived for 33 years. We are so deeply

5:48honored to have you with us today,

5:50Maestra. And finally, Mariso Viea

5:53Bramama is an assistant professor of art

5:56history at Trinity University in San

5:58Antonio, Texas. She is a scholar of

6:01trans-Pacific art, and her research

6:03explores the artistic exchanges between

6:06Latin America and East Asia after World

6:08War II via international leftist

6:10networks. Her current book project

6:12examines Chilean artist Jose

6:14Venturelli's murals and prints in Chile,

6:18China, Cuba, East Germany, and

6:20Switzerland from the 1940s until the

6:221980s. Thank you all so much for being

6:25with us today. And with that, I will

6:27turn it over to Florencia to share a bit

6:30about her recent publication.

6:33Thank you so much to the [clears throat]

6:35Association of Latin American Art for

6:38inviting me today to present the book.

6:40Thank you Leslie, Marisol, Gabriella,

6:42and Joanna. And I want to also offer my

6:46deep, deep, deep gratitude to the

6:49amazing Lucy Leard for being here today.

6:52Um, I became aware of Lucy's writing

6:55when I was an art student in Chile and

6:58her theories on dematerialization and

7:00her very famous trip to Argentina were

7:02sort of a topic of conversation in the

7:05hallway in a sort of conceptually driven

7:07school such as the one that I attended.

7:09But it was really in the 2017 2018

7:13academic year when I had the immense

7:16privilege to spend

7:18>> not only um days um by multiple weeks

7:23with Lucy's archive and that archive in

7:26that archive I was able to find this

7:28very rich immense material on

7:31transnational solidarity which was which

7:33was super important for the debates on

7:36the book. So um very um very very uh

7:41briefly the book um in the book I

7:43examine the work of Alfredo Jar through

7:46the um the paradigm of the colonial time

7:50and what I call the aesthetic of the

7:51unfinished. What I try to do in the book

7:54is to um talk about the ways in which

7:56the military coup in Chile affect Jar's

7:59art but also the imposition of

8:01neoliberalism which was first

8:04implemented in Chile as the laboratory

8:06of the world and then all over the

8:07world. So how that neoliberal model

8:11therefore how that war um has been

8:14informing Jar to create his work not

8:17only in relationship to Chile and the

8:18Americas but also the world. So I'm

8:21going to start by reading um a fragment

8:24from the conclusion. The book has three

8:27chapters uh morning accountability and

8:30failure and a conclusion that is titled

8:32the end of the world. But I wanted to

8:34start with the conclusion because

8:35there's nothing really conclusive in the

8:37conclusion which is titled the end of

8:39the world but it's sort of an invitation

8:41for a new beginning.

8:44Um so I'm going to read for about uh 8

8:47minutes and then we're going to start

8:48the conversation.

8:50Um, in the fall of 2024, while working

8:53on revisions for this book, I met with

8:56German human rights attorney Wolf Gang

8:58Khal at a small cafe in Berlin. Best

9:02known for representing the former

9:03national security agency intelligence

9:06contractor and whistblower Edward

9:08Snowden. Khal has been prosecuting war

9:11criminal through universal jurisdiction

9:13for more than 30 years.

9:16Considering his collaboration with

9:18Alfredo Jar in 2012 when they printed

9:21the phrase arrest Kissinger in three

9:23major newspapers,

9:25I wanted to learn more about the

9:27intersection of culture and justice from

9:29the perspective of the law and about

9:31Chile's historical and symbolic role in

9:34this context. There is a before and an

9:37after Pinot's arrest in London for

9:40crimes against humanity in 1998. He told

9:43me at the beginning of our meeting that

9:46marked an important present for what

9:48many human rights lawyers are doing

9:50today. He said that present mean hope. I

9:55thought hope for instance. Um but that

10:00hope had a um it wasn't complete.

10:04Pinoted, for instance, the famous

10:06fascist general that led the Chilean

10:08dictatorship, managed to avoid a trial

10:10in Europe and he died in Santiago in 20

10:13in 2006 without being condemned. He was

10:1792 years old and while the government in

10:19office um denied him a state a state

10:23funeral, he was still mourned with the

10:25symbolic honors of an army general by

10:28nearly 60,000 tearful Chileans.

10:31>> [snorts]

10:31>> Meanwhile, at Pinotet's wake, the

10:33Cardinal Archie Bishop of Santiago,

10:35Francisco Havier Rasuri, state, and I

10:38quote, "We thank God for all the

10:40qualities he gave to the general and all

10:42the good that Pino did for our country."

10:45End quote. In the unchanged narrative of

10:48modernity or in a world of lineal times,

10:52so the story goes, only those who France

10:54Fannon called the ratchet of the earth

10:57are subject to the punishments of the

10:59law. And in Latin America specifically,

11:02as the uh um Argentinian writer Horgeis

11:05Bourhees says, apherisms such as Hegel's

11:08the state is the reality of the moral

11:10ideals strike us as sinister jokes,

11:14[snorts] centering our conversation in

11:16such irony. Khal, who is also the

11:19founder and general secretary of the

11:20European Center of Constitutional and

11:22Human Rights, continued, "This is why we

11:26call the work that we do at the center

11:28as interventions. We know that we are

11:30not achieving victory, but we also know

11:33that small achievements such as binoted

11:35arrest in London can do much to inform

11:38our work as lawyers and keep up soci

11:40society's hope for accountability.

11:43Accountability in the minds and hearts

11:45of anti-imperialist lawyers and

11:47resistant fighters extends beyond the

11:50court and into the public space where

11:53performativity and artistic

11:54interventions can also criminalize

11:57perpetrators in society. This is what

12:00Jar aimed in his newspaper intervention

12:03calling for the arrest of Henry

12:05Kissinger. And this is also why Khal, as

12:08he told me in our meeting, I'm

12:09interested in collaborating with artists

12:11such as Alfredo.

12:13In this book, I have argued that while

12:15justice is bound to fail, failure does

12:18not mean giving up, but continue in the

12:20struggle for accountability through

12:22interventions shaped by collective

12:24efforts and sustained by hope. I have

12:28also argued that such hope arise from

12:30those who mourn in emancipatory

12:32temporalities and those who stand in

12:34solidarity with them as well as from

12:37those with shared histories of

12:39liberation. As the Syrianborn author

12:42Shifra Safatti state in 2024,

12:45all our liberations are tied together.

12:48We are filled with hope. Or as Khal also

12:52told me in our meeting, only through the

12:55spirit of global solidarity can the

12:58fight for human rights generate the

13:00possibility of their enforcement.

13:03This conceptualization of the

13:05relationship between human rights,

13:07transnational solidarities, and

13:09transdisciplinarity

13:10recalls the three main concepts of my

13:13book. Mourning or the enacting of

13:16decolonial past, presents, and futures.

13:20accountability or the search for

13:22reciprocal enforcement and failure or

13:25what Khal called interventions in

13:28plural. They all overlap. It also

13:31recalled the work of so many poets,

13:33artists, intellectuals, activists and

13:35scholars whose theories accompanied me

13:37in the writing of this book. It recalls

13:40for instance the Chilean poet Gabriela

13:43Mistral whose poem anniversary

13:46dismantled the clock time of Gregorian

13:48calendar or the time of Kronos in Greek

13:50mythology and thus the foundation of

13:53universal history with the verse and we

13:56go on and we go on isimos isimos

14:00and it also recalls the work of Alfredo

14:02jar which I have conceptualized in this

14:05book through what I call the aesthetic

14:06of the unfinished and this is one

14:08example.

14:09a work that is titled the end of the

14:12world.

14:13At the center of the Kellis house, the

14:15main space at the Kindle, which is a

14:17contemporary art space in Berlin, is a

14:20small cube made by Jar in 2024. The cube

14:24is only 4 cm in each direction,

14:27contrasting with the colossal dimension

14:29of the space of 20 square m

14:33illuminated by multiple red uh uh uh

14:37bulbs line up along the ceiling. uh the

14:40diffused lighting of the space contrast

14:42with the single direct hard and bright

14:45source illuminating the small space or

14:47let's say the cube which is made of 10

14:51thin slides of metals including among

14:53others copper, lithium and rare earth.

14:57These metals are essential for the

14:59manufacturing and maintainance of our

15:01digital life. the production of computer

15:03chips, cables, screens, and so forth,

15:05and renewable technologies such as solar

15:08solar panels and electric vehicles, all

15:11which are connected to computers. The

15:14drive to extract precious minerals is

15:16contributing to displacement and murder.

15:19[snorts] Mining companies are profiting

15:21from ecological destruction and the

15:23devastation of black, brown, and

15:25indigenous communities. The energy

15:27transition is a contemporary form of

15:29colonialism, writes the um political

15:33geologist Adam Babed [snorts] with the

15:36cube of 10 critical minerals in Jar's

15:38work standing for the planet and the

15:40vast emptiness of the red space

15:42emphasizing the seriousness of our

15:44planet's collapse. Bavet continues, the

15:47extraction of each is the end of the

15:50world. Considering however that such

15:53extractivism has been ongoing happening

15:56in this low violence of the capital

15:59scene, the end of the world remind us of

16:02Anal Khano's statement about coloniality

16:05and the colonial resistance that I quote

16:07literally all over the bookimos

16:11advent

16:14and against he said acknowledging the

16:17ongoing catastrophe that is the world

16:19and the task of challenging this by for

16:21a means as Jar does in his project of

16:24the colonial time. From this

16:26perspective, the end of the world um

16:30affirms not so much the end of the

16:32planet and thus the end of resistance,

16:34but is a denunciation of our present

16:36global crisis.

16:39And yet, as Jar writes in an

16:42installation from 2019, we must prepare

16:45to leave again. that is to continue

16:48mourning, failing and creating in the

16:51search for accountability inhabiting the

16:54ongoing practice of hope that drives

16:56collective efforts for liberation.

16:59This is what Khal meaned at the end of

17:01our meeting in that small cafe in Berlin

17:04when he told me about the concept of

17:06concrete utopia which he developed in a

17:092024 book of the same name.

17:12Advocating for the potential of human

17:15rights to intervene in our current

17:17global crisis if they are reinvented

17:19through the re-examination of their

17:21utopian roots through feminist

17:24decolonial and echocritical

17:25interventions. Khal said and I quote,

17:28"Utopia is the right to hope." Utopia

17:33from this perspective means a way of

17:35thinking, being, and relating that

17:37acknowledges the relationalities between

17:40past, presents, and futures. Harken back

17:43to Jar's work and to the work of so many

17:46artists, writers, poets, scholars,

17:48architects, activists, stu students, and

17:51lawyers.

17:52>> [snorts]

17:52>> It recalls and honors all of those in

17:54cultures of resistance that create,

17:57remember, and imagine a world in

17:59becoming or a world in the colonial

18:02time. So that's the end of the book, but

18:05it's also an invitation to think about

18:07the book not as a book with a beginning,

18:09a middle, and an end.

18:11>> Yeah. Thank you everyone for being here.

18:14And I this reminds me to the one of the

18:16works that um Florencia discusses in

18:19this um in this book that I en enjoy

18:21reading so much um in which Jar talks I

18:25don't know if you can bring one of the

18:26slides when you show I can't go on I

18:30will go on which is one of the works

18:34that I get the most inspired with when I

18:36see know that um Jar brings us to us um

18:41from the Italian Marxist philosopher

18:42Antonio Garci

18:44via Samuel Beckett from his 1953

18:46unnameable novel and it's how um

18:51intellectuals and people are reacting

18:54towards a fascism in Italy at that time

18:56right so it's like how can we stand the

18:59situation it's impossible but we

19:01actually have to continue so for me

19:03reading this book really helped me to

19:06apply it to my situation as a personal

19:09um

19:10a personal level but also in a society

19:12so I think That's one of the main takes

19:15away that I can I can see from from

19:17reading this book and engaging with um

19:19what um Florencia uh has um investigated

19:23so well. So

19:26some of our questions uh from with Lucy

19:29were about the

19:31international solidarity networks and I

19:34think we maybe we can start from there

19:36and Florencia you mentioned at the

19:37beginning that looking at Lucy's archive

19:40was uh such a change in how you created

19:42this project and how I wonder if you can

19:45talk about how you saw that uh network

19:49in the archive if that's something that

19:50you can um share with us while we get

19:54Lucy back.

19:55>> Sure. Um, thank you so much for your

19:58words, uh, Marisol. Um, but these are

20:01some of the, uh, images that I found in

20:03the archive that really helped me to

20:05understand the fact that the coup in

20:08Chile, which happened in 1973, was not

20:12seen in the United States and the world

20:14as a sort of um, nation state event, but

20:18it was a hemispheric event. It was a

20:20global event and it was um protested

20:23from the United States as something that

20:26people thought that they also belong to.

20:29So um early on I found for instance this

20:33um archive at Luces again very vast

20:36documentation documenting different

20:38chapters of solidarity all over uh the

20:41east coast. And here we see, and this

20:44might be Lucy at the center, um how uh

20:48cultural workers in New York gather in

20:50Soho to repaint a mural that had been

20:54erased in Chile right after the coup. So

20:57right after the coup, um the you know

21:01murals made by the brigades were painted

21:05were erased with many paints, right? uh

21:08a lot of like all the literature that

21:10the left-wing literature was burned, all

21:13the poems by radical poets, all those

21:16books were burned. Uh the universities

21:19are being controlled by the military,

21:21everything was destroyed in order to

21:23start something new. The plan was to

21:25start from zero. And that's the

21:27narrative of modernity. Uh when you know

21:30the new world was discovered, uh the

21:33plan was to destroy it all so this new

21:36institution could be built. So in order

21:38to start something new, you have to

21:39destroy the past. And the book is sort

21:41of a response to that that the fact that

21:44the past can never really be deleted,

21:47can never really be erased. And that's

21:49that's why cultures of resistance are

21:52leaving that mourning in that sort of um

21:55uh ongoing remembering of the past

21:58because the past always exists even

22:00beyond the debris, right, of progressive

22:02time. So this is a great example that

22:04shows how cultures of resistance in New

22:07York even when the mural was deleted in

22:10Chile they are painting it again in New

22:13York and not um directly in the wall but

22:16in different panels. Um, so this mural

22:19was originally made by Deigriar

22:21Ramonapara and then they painted again

22:24in uh New York but in panels so that

22:26then they could all walk together as a

22:29collective and they all stand in front

22:32in the in front of the headquarters of

22:34ITT which was this telephone

22:37multinational company that had a lot to

22:39do with the um coup in the first place

22:42because their business was being

22:44threatened right with agenda revolution.

22:47So um in New York the reenactment the uh

22:52of the mural as a collective sense of

22:55solidarity for a event that was

22:58happening in our hemisphere and I'm

23:00quoting directly from Leart's archive.

23:03She mentioned this is our hemisphere. We

23:05have to do something because this is

23:07also happening here right it's a

23:09hemispheric problem. So um finding all

23:13those archives really was really

23:15illuminating to think about the global

23:18aspect of the coup and the fact that you

23:21know Chile was not this isolated case in

23:23global politics but was something that

23:26uh obviously was this would serve as as

23:28this laboratory for neoliberalism in the

23:30world but also artists knew artists knew

23:33it and they were making that visible and

23:35this is another work that I find at the

23:37archive here you have a yende this was a

23:40mural made by a collective called

23:42people's painter, a collective form in

23:44New Jersey that actually learned about

23:47the brigades by going to Till in 1972.

23:50Uh and then they came back to the United

23:52States and in Ruckers they made this

23:55mural in which you see a yende here

23:58accompanied by students and the worker

24:01and then you read you can kill a man but

24:03not an ideal like you can kill the like

24:07you can destroy the world but memory

24:09still resist. So that understanding of a

24:12decolonial time is really present in all

24:15these archives. And then I also found uh

24:18a really rich you know again and vast

24:21documentation of different exhibitions

24:23that Lucy organized uh to help victims

24:26of the regime. And here in the left this

24:28is the um poster of an exhibition

24:31organized by Lucy at the Ivankarp

24:33Gallery in Soho New York. It was titled

24:35the Chile Emergency Exhibition and it

24:39gathered uh multiple artworks and then

24:42you know from very famous artists at the

24:43time and then with that money that it

24:46was the equivalent of almost $220,000

24:50today they actually help victims of the

24:52regime to escape Chile. So these are

24:55concrete action that actually help

24:57artists that were in detention camps to

24:59leave the country. There was this is

25:02another very interesting event that

25:04happened organized by Lucy as well at uh

25:07Leon Galoop studio in LaGuardia in which

25:10people gathered to talk about what was

25:13happening in Chile. So the notion of

25:14this kind of dialogic right

25:17understanding of what was happening is

25:19super relevant also. And then not only

25:23in the 70s, so the dictatorship started

25:25in 1973, but also in the 80s when Lucy

25:29organized alongside um uh uh a cultural

25:34worker from El Salvador this massive

25:35exhibition that was called artist

25:37against us US intervention in Central

25:39America in the 80s. One of the main

25:41exhibition in the context of Ronald

25:43Reagan's war in Central America. So, one

25:46of the main exhibitions was titled La

25:48Vera America, the true avenue of the

25:51Americas. And then there were a lot of

25:53banners in the street. And one of those

25:56banners shows um sorry, I'm trying to

25:59move my my uh So, one of these banners

26:01shows uh the portrait of

26:05um Orlando

26:07um Salvador Yende at the center and

26:11Paulo Nera to the right. And Orlando

26:14Leeier was a very famous politician who

26:17during Agenda was um the cult the the

26:20ambassador of Chile in the United

26:23States. And then he went back to serve

26:25in Agenda's um government and then he

26:29was tortured and then he had he he was

26:31able to exile. He came back to the

26:33United States. Um he had a lot of tie to

26:37Congress and in 1976

26:40he was assassinated in Washington DC in

26:43the biggest international crime in the

26:44United States before 911

26:47and um he was assassinated through

26:50direct orders of Austino and actually

26:53Kissinger as recent declassification

26:56documents have shown us Kissinger knew

26:58it and he didn't prevent it. So the fact

27:01that in the 80s Lucy's organizing a show

27:05in which not only the subject matter of

27:07Central America but Central America in

27:09relationship to Chile are shown speaks

27:12about that sort of hemispheric and

27:14global history, right? That shared

27:17histories of solidarity that I try to

27:19trace.

27:20>> I mean all these things that you were

27:21telling me about like how this archive

27:24is telling a story that is so difficult

27:26to actually find now in Chile, it's

27:28incredible. So some of the um scholars

27:32working and researching in Chile often

27:34tell me that trying to do any type of

27:36research before 1973 look is similar to

27:39do archaeology work because so much has

27:42been destroyed by I mean was by by the

27:46military regime and also by people that

27:49were scared of having documents that

27:51could be um um problematic if they found

27:55them at their homes. Right. So it is

27:57really hard to to find ways of

28:00documenting these movements in Chile. So

28:05I think that this archive is a very

28:07clear example of like how can we

28:08reconstruct a story a history of another

28:10place from other places right in this

28:12case one of these will be the archive um

28:15in the US but I'm sure that similar

28:17archives can be found in other places of

28:19the world. And I also uh I mean I have a

28:23question about Chile specifically

28:24because like the the work that you do

28:26here in this is in this book. It's um so

28:30novel in the sense that is centering

28:31Chile in in the global context. It's a

28:35country that often is considered like

28:37the end of the world. Uh so different

28:39from other parts of Latin America and um

28:42very isolated too by its landscape. So

28:44we have Chile has um some people

28:46describe it as an island, right? With

28:48with the desert in the north uh with the

28:50border of the Andes on the east and um

28:54the Pacific on ocean on the west and

28:57then the glaciers even on the on the on

29:00the very south. So

29:03I want I mean for me it's a such a

29:04specific case on how

29:07an isolated place can be so connected to

29:09the world and I wonder if this this is

29:12just a a case study that could be

29:14applied to other places of to show the

29:16networks of solid solidarity around the

29:18world during the 20th century or if

29:21there's something specific in Chile that

29:23you think it's unique within these

29:25networks

29:27>> and also in the work of DAR of course.

29:31So um I have a friend and colleague uh

29:34Carl Fischer who teaches at for them

29:36that wrote a book in which he um uh

29:41conceptualize that sort of isolation in

29:43Chile or that uniqueness in Chile as a

29:45sort of a form of exceptionalism. Uh

29:48Chile is you know has the desert in the

29:50north, the Pacific Ocean and then the

29:52mountain and then the Antarctica making

29:55itself so unique. Um but that's also uh

30:00a form of exceptionalism in the sense

30:02that it tries to kind of be different

30:04than its others and there's sort of also

30:06this sort of uh racial pro problem in

30:09Chile. Um but I think that um and then

30:14there's a super interesting uh verse by

30:17the poet Nigor who said very famously

30:24we think that we are country but we are

30:25all the landscape and I think that there

30:27is an irony in that anti poem as well by

30:29the great anti poet Nikon

30:32uh that sort of uh im incons like that

30:36immense landscape that seems to sort of

30:39erase the political contingency. It's

30:42sort of a sort it's also sort of a

30:45authoritarian you know poetic that

30:48invisibleize really the polit the

30:51political contingency of the masses of

30:53the people uh in the immensity of the

30:56landscape and I think that the fact that

31:00so historically of course Chile is

31:03important in terms of neoliberalism. It

31:06was Chile where Milton Friedman, the um

31:10economist from the University of Chicago

31:12who ended up getting the Nobel Prize of

31:14economy exercised, experimented, rehears

31:19this model of neoliberalism in Chile.

31:21Like Chile was the laboratory of the

31:23world. Latin America is the United

31:25States backward backyard and um Chile in

31:29this case served as the laboratory to

31:33exercise this model and the only way in

31:35which that model could be exercised was

31:38through a harsh military regime and

31:40that's what and that's why Leelier was

31:45killed in the first place because he

31:46wrote this very famous piece at the

31:48nation and he said um repression for the

31:52majority and economic freedom, economic

31:54freedom, right? Neoliberalism for only a

31:56few are two sides of the same coin. Uh,

32:00in order to implement this new economic

32:02system, you have to kill them all. You

32:04have to make them disappear. You have to

32:06stop political descent. You have to

32:09implement a dictatorial regime.

32:10Therefore, you can start from scratch.

32:12You can start from zero. So Chile is of

32:15course important historically in that

32:18narrative but it's not more important

32:20than let's say other places in the world

32:23uh because everything at the end is

32:25connected and that's why the poetry or

32:29the theory of Gizan the poetics of

32:32relation is so important in the book as

32:33well sort of located the Caribbean in

32:35this global context in which we live in

32:38this uh interwe relationality

32:42there's nothing really that has more

32:44important than other thing but

32:45historically the case of Chile was

32:47significant in that in that specific

32:51case which is the implementation of

32:52neoliberalism. So it started in Chile,

32:55then it um in the 80s it was spread in

32:58the United States and in the UK during

33:01Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher and

33:03then in the '9s sort of all over the

33:05world and those countries that have

33:06resisted neoliberalism

33:09are accused by you know we know um so

33:14yeah Chile is important historically and

33:18then Jar happened to lead that when he

33:20was an a student of architecture.

33:23uh in 1972. So he grew up not in Chile

33:28but in the Caribbean island of MCI and

33:31he only went back to Chile in 1972 and

33:34then he applied to college and he

33:37performed well enough to enter into one

33:39of the most prestigious universities in

33:41architecture in Chile Lonia Chile and it

33:44was there that as a you know student of

33:47architecture where where he experienced

33:48the cool. So that experience of the

33:51ghoul really marked his career and then

33:53how that experience sort of was linked

33:57to other experience of neoliberalism all

33:59over the world and then that's

34:03an important um point also in the book

34:07is that the year 1992 which is of course

34:10the celebration of the 500 anniversary

34:13of the infamous you know discovery of

34:15the Americas uh but it's only there when

34:18neoliberalism became really global when

34:20discourses on globalization started

34:22emerging and it is only then is it is

34:25also then or in the years leading up to

34:28the early 90s when Jar started sort of

34:30expanding his work to this global

34:32context so with kind of like handinhand

34:35with the expansion of neoliberalism

34:40well I want to share this is a perfect

34:42moment because um I yesterday I started

34:45teaching a class on South American art

34:47and I use some of the quotes from your

34:49book from the students and uh to think

34:52about like the invention of the Americas

34:54instead of uh discovery and um the idea

34:58of like col coloniality and being and

35:01modernity being the same side of the uh

35:03two sides of the same coin right was

35:05something that for my students was very

35:07clear that they could see them and they

35:09never even thought about it some of them

35:11told me right so um thank you again for

35:14bringing that in like I think it's a

35:15very from my point of view a very useful

35:18tool to for for teaching what I'm doing

35:20right now and to bring it um in a

35:23historical context that bring us all the

35:25way until today you know and how um art

35:28from this part of the world and other

35:30parts is like responding to uh events uh

35:33500 years ago and um and how sometimes

35:36that is one of the characteristics of um

35:38art that comes from a region that called

35:41South America.

35:43>> Wonderful. Yeah, thank you so much and

35:45thank you also Marisol for teaching some

35:47parts of the books to to your students.

35:49Um that uh very famous quote on um

35:53coloniality and modernity being two

35:55sides of the same coin is actually I

35:57take that quote from the uh Argentinian

35:59symmetrician u um Walter Molo uh but

36:03it's really present in the work of

36:05Alfredo Jar as well. So hi Lucy can you

36:09hear us? Hi. Yes. Not too well, but I

36:13can hear you.

36:14>> Wonderful. I mean, I'm so happy that you

36:15were able to connect through the phone

36:17and thank you, Leslie. So, I don't know,

36:19maybe if you want to just um uh offer

36:23some I you know, responses to the book.

36:26You read the book. Uh I was talking

36:28about how important was your archive for

36:31the writing of this book. all the things

36:34that I found in your archive, the

36:36exhibition

36:38America and how that also include that

36:40beautiful banner I think made by May

36:42Steven with Aendier Nera. Um if you

36:47could just maybe talk about the um your

36:50role in the international solidarity

36:53movement with artist.

36:55>> Yes. Do you want me to just talk about

36:56artist call?

36:58>> Yes.

36:59>> Okay. Um I one thing that did I I Dory

37:02Ashton was not one of the founders of

37:04artists Doug Ashford they have the same

37:07initials

37:09that's up but anyway um we Daniel put

37:16and I and Doug as who is an artist

37:19activist

37:21uh really started the whole thing and it

37:24was an amazing process. It went all over

37:27the country. It went I think to Canada

37:29as well and we just put out a call that

37:32got a huge amount amount of response. It

37:35was called artist call against US

37:37intervention.

37:39The whole name could really be used

37:41because that's what it was.

37:43>> It was very interesting to see how your

37:46archive how these works were exhibited

37:50not only in one place but in multiple

37:52places that sort of mobility of the work

37:55as well.

37:57Um,

37:59do you remember that exhibition, the

38:02emergency Chile emergency exhibition? If

38:04you can see the

38:07Colby.

38:09>> Yeah.

38:10>> Yeah. No, I think I co-curated that with

38:12with Jerry Karns and they asked us to do

38:15an artist call show and they were they

38:17were sort of horrified by the politics,

38:19I think, told me, but they didn't take

38:22it down anyway.

38:23>> Yeah.

38:26I guess um if you could say anything

38:29about uh the art of Alfredo Jar today

38:33and if you have any insight of his art

38:36overall that would be great.

38:38>> So I mean I he's an extremely important

38:41artist like I don't know anybody who

38:43combined so well the the uh public and

38:47and community input and and uh

38:49collaboration with very important art of

38:53his own. I think he's done an amazing

38:55job. I don't know anybody else who can

38:56do that.

38:58>> Thank you so much.

39:01>> Thanks very much for trying to include

39:03me.

39:04>> Thank you very much.

39:07>> Let's continue the conversation and um

39:10Florencia Marisol and I want to just

39:13encourage people also to share comments,

39:16questions in the chat as well.

39:20>> Yes, thank you. Thank you, Leslie, for

39:21helping with that logistic. And um I

39:24mean, it feels a little bit like I was

39:25in a performance right now, you know.

39:27So, I I I'm so glad we we got to see uh

39:30hear a little bit of um Lucy's thoughts

39:33and memories and um such a a gift. Thank

39:37you, Florencia also for inviting her.

39:39And so one of the questions that I had

39:42also for both of you and now Florencia

39:45if you want to share more about um the

39:48role of poetry and especially radical

39:50poetry in Alfredo Jar's work and um also

39:54in uh some of his um interlocators like

39:58Edward Lissand that really mark um it

40:02had an impact on his work and u and how

40:05how is that linked to

40:07to an action in the world and and and

40:11then his own uh use of words and images.

40:14>> Mhm. Um thank you so much for bringing

40:17the issue of poetry to the conversation.

40:20So the work of Jar has typically been

40:23analyzed in terms of um his use of

40:26photography and photojournalism more

40:29specifically. But there was also in my

40:31research I um learned that there was not

40:34really anything about poetry. And this

40:37is an artist that describes himself as a

40:40frustrated poet. And that this is an

40:42artist that reads a lot of poetry. And

40:45this is an artist that also use poems to

40:48create works as well. The um the um for

40:53instance the uh the the the the work

40:55that I showed you before. No yet. uh we

40:59have to prepare to leave again that's

41:01taken from a Russian poet and uh one

41:05important poet in Jar's uh art and

41:08thinking is Pablo Nerula and this is an

41:11early work that he did here in the

41:12scream I'm showing you the very first

41:15work that he did in his career the one

41:18in the left in he in which he simply

41:20writes the number 11 over and over again

41:23until exhaustation and he writes and

41:26writes and writes because after that day

41:29September 11 everything changed forever

41:32time never really continue being the

41:34same there is a drastic shift so it's a

41:36sort of conceptual piece right that

41:38marked that sort of interruption of time

41:41in lineal modernity and then he has

41:44another piece and very early piece and

41:46this is 1974

41:48he's still a student of architecture at

41:51University Chile and he writes four

41:54times the Spanish name Pablo

41:57So four Pablo that died for different

42:00circumstances in 1973. One is Picasso.

42:05The other one is Pablo Casal the chist

42:08Spanish um the musician and um and Pablo

42:13Neruda who was killed by the

42:16dictatorship only two weeks after the

42:18coup. So Neruda was 69 years old. He was

42:21sort of um you know in public. He has he

42:25he has been praised by uh you know

42:29rightwing circles for being the poet of

42:32Chile, the poet of landscape, the poet

42:34you know of uh poor

42:38the same with the poet of you know

42:41beautiful children but in reality they

42:43were like radical poets and that's

42:46something that of course fascism that

42:49doesn't want to doesn't really want to

42:50see. So um the last poet that Nera wrote

42:55um just before his death was a very long

42:59poem that was titled um Nixonio

43:04um like a an Alansa revolena.

43:08So he wrote that poem informed by the

43:11declassification of uh the ITT documents

43:14in 19 in 1972 which literally exposed

43:18the real aim of the cool which was the

43:21implementation of neoliberalism again

43:24which is when multinational companies

43:25will control the state which is what we

43:27are now seeing all over the world. So

43:30Nerda informed by the declassification

43:33of that company that was saying we need

43:36the cool we need to prevent Agenda to

43:38became president because if Agenda

43:40becomes president then our own interests

43:42right our multinational will lose you

43:46know its uh power in Chile and this can

43:49replicate in other nations in the

43:50Americas. So that was the main purpose

43:53of the cool. was not ideological

43:55necessarily, but it was economic. And uh

43:58the declassification of the of that very

44:01important archive was then published by

44:03the uh state sponsored uh publishing

44:07press Kimu which means son um of

44:10knowledge in Mapun which is the language

44:12of the Maput. And then Nerdula is

44:16reading that and then informed by that

44:18Nerdula wrote his last poem which is

44:20really this uh weapon against fascism,

44:24this weapon against uh multinational

44:28you know injection in world politics and

44:30in the in world in world culture and

44:33after that he died. The same with

44:36Leelier. After Leelier said um

44:39repression for the majority and economic

44:41freedom for a minority are two sides of

44:43the same coin after that he's been

44:45killed. So everyone that was like openly

44:48saying that the actual meaning of the

44:52catastrophe was an economic you know

44:54this new this advanced form of

44:56capitalism is killed. Then the same

44:58happened with Aende where because Aende

45:01came to the United Nations in 1972 and

45:04he provide a pretty good idea of what is

45:06neoliberalism and then he's killed. So

45:10um Nera was battling cancer. Yes. He's

45:13in his house in Lac Crues in the coast

45:16of Chile and then by very very very

45:20strange circumstances he's dead. Uh and

45:24then but he's he and then you know

45:26recent archives have you know tell us

45:28that he was poisoned and it is

45:31interesting because two three years ago

45:33with the annivers with the 50th

45:35anniversary of the coup um the case of

45:38Nulla was closed as if you could even

45:42close a case as if by closing a case

45:46people won't stop fighting for justice.

45:50So um the that sort of um that that the

45:56the presence of universal jurisdiction,

45:59the presence of the law, I realized by

46:01the end of the writing of the book that

46:03was it was really present all over

46:05[snorts] the book. And that's why I

46:06ended up writing the conclusion

46:08interviewing this lawyer. Um I'm like

46:12all over the world [laughter] with what

46:14I'm saying, but that's sort of the

46:16spirit of the book as well.

46:19Well, thank you, Florence. Yeah, I have

46:21so many other questions that I would

46:22like to ask you, but I also think we

46:25have like 30 minutes for questions from

46:26the audience. So, I invite people to

46:29write them on the chat or also to um

46:33raise your hand, I think. and and we can

46:35uh collect them too all to first maybe

46:38if you if um you

46:42want to use your voice or write down or

46:46we are open to different modalities.

46:50Well, I I I'll give people time to uh

46:53ponder and then I will continue with

46:55some of my um questions. Fencia, if

46:58that's all right. I don't I don't see

47:00any or like you see them.

47:01>> I think Yeah, I think that there's

47:02question the time. Okay.

47:06>> Um I found the concept of the colonial

47:09time to be powerful. If you can say more

47:12about that and perhaps with another

47:13example. Yeah. So um thank you for that

47:17question Gina. Um and here I have

47:21another example. So um the question of

47:24the colonial time started uh with the

47:27very invention of the Americas. uh

47:30Edmund Mundo Gorman the Mexican scholar

47:33would coin the discovery of the Americas

47:36the invention of the Americas. the

47:37Americas were not discovered but were

47:39invented and when that happened there is

47:42an imposition of a new space the

47:44so-called new world and I and and also

47:46an idea of a time that is lineal that is

47:49progressive that it it again erase the

47:52past right um so

47:56what is at stake in memory studies and I

47:58also come from a tradition of studying

48:00you know memory um like memory objects

48:03as well is the issue of the past right

48:07how the past can be remembered uh

48:10through memorials, through literature,

48:12through poetry, through memory studies.

48:15So the question of the colonial time

48:16really brings memory study and our

48:19history together and and kind of uh

48:22helped me to understand the work of jar

48:25uh as something that is um as something

48:28that is always pointing to the present,

48:30the past and the future together. So

48:32this is an example. This is a very

48:34famous work by Jar uh made uh between

48:371971 1979 and 1981 in Chile in which he

48:43intervene different um um um uh you know

48:49um uh billboards in Santiago with the

48:53very kind of um innocent question but

48:55also very charged question about

48:57happiness. Eselis he wrote are you

49:00happy? And then obviously in a country

49:04under a dictatorial regime people was

49:07not allowed to vote. So people were not

49:10allowed to say yes or no. But the very

49:12question of happiness was something that

49:14people this this question sort of invite

49:16people to actually um uh intervene right

49:20in that censorship uh of a dictatorial

49:23regime. So uh there has been multiple

49:26studies about this work. there's uh uh

49:29and then you know it's one of the most

49:31famous works by jar but what I what what

49:34I found interesting about this work and

49:36I what what I sort of offer in the book

49:38which is different than previous

49:39scholarship is that it's not so much

49:42saying no I'm not happy because I feel

49:45all this censorship or yes I'm happy

49:48because I agree with the dictatorship

49:50um is saying yes I'm happy because uh my

49:56struggle is my Right. So, uh there is a

49:59very important um uh thinker in Chile in

50:04this um in the in 1977

50:08and 74. Miguel Enriquez, he was the

50:11founder of the Moto Revolutionario and

50:14he was killed in 1974 and he was um he

50:18he thought about his happiness as his

50:20struggle as his fight. his happiness was

50:23what kept what kept his struggle on

50:26going and he and he sort of took that

50:28from Markx which wrote in his confession

50:31my happiness is my fight. So what is art

50:35that deals with sort of these

50:37complicated questions can also means

50:39happiness. What is happiness? H

50:41happiness is not necessarily something

50:44that relate directly to this kind of

50:46political binomial spectrum but it

50:48relates to how do we position ourselves

50:51in relationship to our different

50:53different fights. What is interesting

50:55about this piece is that it was made in

50:58Chile in the 70s and then it has been

51:01reproduced over and over by Jar not only

51:03in Chile but in multiple places in the

51:05world in Mexico in the United States in

51:08many many places in the world like

51:10asking the question about happiness not

51:12only in Chile as the birth of

51:14neoliberalism but all over the world uh

51:17neoliberalism continues neoliberal

51:20neoliberalism is today even more um

51:24blatant right with um you know um uh new

51:29technologies.

51:30So are we happy? Maybe we are happy

51:34because we are against it. And then all

51:37of this again relates to that major

51:39statement by the Peruvian sociologist

51:42Analo.

51:44He said

51:46we live in this world in which we are

51:48not happy but we are against and by

51:50being against we perhaps are happy. Um

51:53Khano very famously said we don't live

51:56in Mars. We don't live in Jupiter. We

51:58live in the earth like this is the

52:00earth. We live in colonialism. The earth

52:02is colonialism. We live in a world the

52:05world is war. But we can be against. So

52:08what does it means to be against? How do

52:10we position ourel in relationship to our

52:12happiness by being against? So this is a

52:16work that was made again in the context

52:18of the dictatorship in Chile in the late

52:20'7s. But then the artists have

52:22reproduced the work over and over again

52:25over and over again in multiple places

52:26in the world with that repetition

52:29meaning the fight must continue. the

52:32question of happiness is not resolved

52:35and I'm going to fail and fail again and

52:37fail again and continue failing because

52:40perhaps that happiness will never come

52:42but I can um fight back. So that's

52:46another example.

52:50Well, Roencia, there are more questions,

52:51but I also wanted to say about uh if I

52:53wanted to add from the from reading the

52:55book and and seeing how like you all I

52:59mean Jar and other people are fighting

53:02against you say imperialism,

53:03neoliberalism,

53:05uh also Kant and universal aesthetics

53:08and also a vision of um

53:11South America or Latin America as a pass

53:14through like the lens of magical realism

53:16and thinking about like how many other

53:19authors

53:20are fighting against that uh and you

53:22bring them so well in connection in

53:24conversation in your book. So I I really

53:26appreciate that and it's a a great

53:28source of um of references for for

53:31understanding the colonial and

53:33aesthetics too. Um so there are several

53:36questions. Um so I'm going to read them

53:38all maybe and then can um well I'll read

53:42some of them and then see if we can um

53:44connect and you can answer them

53:46together. So from um Nicole Nadesh um

53:51Dr. San Martin I enjoyed your notes

53:53about the movement of the banners to a

53:56different exhibit. Would you say that

53:57mobility is one of the most important

53:59factors in expanding the international

54:01solidarity uh movement

54:04then from Himeme Gonzalez and for um

54:09there I mean he says uh there are a lot

54:11of texts around Alfredo's work what I

54:13have been hearing in the talk actually

54:15brings lots of other links of the

54:18specific uh trajectories of Alfredo in

54:20the United States and in the link with

54:22the colonial questions in the 70s. So

54:24the question is what guided you first uh

54:27your first interest in Alfredo's work

54:29and how did you face the enterprise to

54:32write about this referential artist and

54:34his work?

54:36>> I think that I'm going to respond that

54:37one first and then we can continue. So,

54:39but the first one, yes, it's super

54:41interesting the fact that the same

54:43banner was then exhibited somewhere

54:45else. And I think that that's connected

54:46to the fact that for instance, this work

54:49has been reproduced over and over like

54:51the work of art is not finished in the

54:54walls of a specific museum or in a

54:57specific time because time, you know, is

54:59not linear because perhaps a work of art

55:03is not only limited to a specific epoch

55:06because modernity is quite larger. So

55:08that's a great um thing u you know a

55:11great to think about the mobility of

55:13works. Um and then thank you Hime for

55:16that for that question. Yeah there is a

55:19lot written on Alfred uh there's there

55:22more than uh 80 monograph on the artist

55:26multiple interviews. Um

55:30I uh you know I learned about Jar when I

55:34was a student in Chile when I was like

55:3718 years old. he's always been there as

55:40uh as a example that teachers will bring

55:43you know to our classes and yes so the

55:47uh the the challenge was uh huge and uh

55:52I remember um so I wrote the first piece

55:56on jar in 2014. Uh he uh reenacted this

56:01work uh one of his most famous pieces.

56:05This is um the first time that he did

56:07this piece in 1987. The p the piece is

56:10titled a logo for America. This is Times

56:12Square in New York. And he was invited

56:16by um you know um to um project an

56:20animation and he wrote this is not

56:22America uh in connection to the map of

56:26the United States and then he said this

56:28is not the American flag and then he put

56:30the United States flag. So what really

56:32is America for someone that was coming

56:34from Chile and was super shocked to

56:36learn that everybody called him

56:38themsself America but he also called

56:40himself America someone from the

56:41American hemisphere. So that work was

56:44reenacted in 2014

56:47in conjunction with an exhibition titled

56:49Under the Same Sun cured by Pablo Leon

56:52Deavar at the Guenai Museum in New York

56:54and it was reenacted in more than 30

56:56billboards and more than 40 signs in

56:59Time Square and I remember I had the

57:02opportunity to go to the opening we were

57:04all there I remember even France Hans

57:07Hake was there who is an old friend of

57:08Alfredo and everybody's like seeing this

57:11the the very first time that this work

57:13was reenacted and it was so so so um

57:16special to for the very for the very

57:18first time to see a work by Jar in

57:20Chile. This was also the first work that

57:22I saw in Chile by Jar in the context of

57:24the art and politics conference that

57:26took place in 2004 at Uncia Arcis uh

57:30back you know in Chile. Um and then I

57:34wrote a piece about this uh work and I

57:37remember that my advisor um at the time

57:40Tatiana Flores from Rucker she told me

57:43you have to write your dissertation on

57:45jar because you understand Chile you

57:47understand photography so do it and I'm

57:49like well but so difficult there's so

57:51much written about him and we were

57:54reading a lot about you know the

57:55colonial theory we were reading um about

57:58the idea of of Latin America minos and

58:01Khano and Then I just wrote a

58:04dissertation on but that it was titled

58:06the decolonial project of Alfredo Jar

58:09and that's how how it started and

58:11Alfredo was super super generous uh has

58:14been super generous throughout the

58:15process. I went to his studio on 26 uh

58:19and 10th Avenue in New York and I

58:21remember going there and I said hey I

58:23want to write a dissertation about your

58:24art and and then he's like why like what

58:27are you going to why what are you going

58:29to say? And then I explained him the the

58:31method which was this sort of decolonial

58:33approach and he gave me a tower of books

58:35that I remember. I then walked to my

58:38apartment at the time that was really

58:40close by the studio and that's how

58:43everything started. But it changed a lot

58:45from the dissertation to the book. Uh,

58:48but it's been I I I have felt it it's

58:52been a joy to work with someone that him

58:54and to actually have access to his

58:56memories, his archive, his his

58:58solidarity with with the project. It's

59:01been a marvelous uh a marvelous uh

59:05experience. Thank you for that question.

59:09>> Okay, I'll continue with other questions

59:11here. uh from Ali Herin. I am interested

59:14in your point uh about Paris poem and

59:17how Jarus deals or pushes against the

59:20landscape in his work. The use of texts

59:23but also the of contrast and framing

59:25that makes the landscape simultaneously

59:27backdrop and out of place is very

59:30interesting. Can you speak more about

59:32Dar's interaction with landscape

59:34imaginary and the idea of landscape in

59:37Chile and Latin America more broadly

59:39imaginary?

59:41That's a really great question, Alise,

59:43and I'm sure that we can talk more about

59:45that when you come and visit my class uh

59:47later this this uh this fall. Um so,

59:52Nikon Par, he um is this very famous

59:56poet. He died a few years ago and he had

59:59a daughter. Her name is uh he's alive.

1:00:02He lived in the United States, Catalina

1:00:04Parra. And actually Catalina Par also

1:00:08exhibited also shown an animation in

1:00:11Times Square based on a poem by her

1:00:15father and the poem the anti poem again.

1:00:18So Nikonor Par is this um it's the

1:00:20brother of Vleta par you know it's a

1:00:22kind of very important family in Chile

1:00:25um he's he developed this idea of

1:00:28antipoetry and um he wrote a poem saying

1:00:31that the United States where the statue

1:00:33with the liberty is actually a statue so

1:00:35it's a kind of an irony right like in

1:00:37the United States the notion of liberty

1:00:39is a statue it doesn't really move so

1:00:42Catalina para simply wrote that in the

1:00:45same screen this is the um spectacle

1:00:47color screen in time square. So um Jar

1:00:52um is in conversation with Catalina Par

1:00:55in that sort of this is not in in the

1:00:57negation right uh of um what the United

1:01:01States you know the exceptionalism in

1:01:04other words so uh there are some works

1:01:07involving landscape and perhaps the most

1:01:10famous one at least in Chile is that one

1:01:12in which he puts all the Chilean banners

1:01:14and it's called antart before I leave

1:01:18the country and he sort of um lead that

1:01:21nation right leave the the the the

1:01:24isolation of the nation. Um and that's

1:01:27interesting. So in that in that um in in

1:01:31that series of photograph we see the

1:01:33Pacific Ocean and the sand and the

1:01:36immensity of that you know sort of

1:01:39liberty that is not really what it

1:01:41really sense within the country within

1:01:44the restrictions of neoliberalism and

1:01:46the dictatorship. Right? So we have the

1:01:48ocean, we have this immensity but there

1:01:50is nothing really immense in what we can

1:01:53do as humans in the conditions of a

1:01:55dictatorial regime. But in the case of

1:01:58Jar uh the nation the idea of the nation

1:02:01which is of course a colonial idea right

1:02:04uh the the Chilean nation became a

1:02:06nation when they got their independence

1:02:08from from Spain but then internal form

1:02:11of colonialism obviously continued and

1:02:14the perhaps the most famous example is

1:02:16the ongoing you know conflict with the

1:02:18Mapuche and all the other indigenous

1:02:20communities in Chile. Um but Jar decided

1:02:25to leave to it because he was isolated

1:02:28not only in the claustrophobic

1:02:30you know land non- landscape of the

1:02:33dictatorship but also from the art scene

1:02:35at the time. So I think that um

1:02:39landscape in jar is more like um uh a

1:02:44metaphor to accompany other you know um

1:02:49uh concepts in in Jar's art specifically

1:02:52but landscape as something related to

1:02:55the nation because the sea for instance

1:02:58the ocean is something that he uses in

1:03:00multiple works to talk about the issue

1:03:02of colonization expansionism this

1:03:04transatlantic you

1:03:06project that was colonization and then

1:03:08the ocean as that sort of connectivity

1:03:11in relationship to um globalization but

1:03:14in reality it is the opposite right so I

1:03:17don't think that in Jar's work landscape

1:03:19is sort of restricted to the nation

1:03:21state because he's very critical to the

1:03:23notion of the nation state in the first

1:03:25place but it's more something

1:03:27allegorical to sort of um uh raise other

1:03:31questions like larger questions about

1:03:33colonization and incarceration and so

1:03:35forth

1:03:40So we have uh one other question um from

1:03:43Nate Nikolov. Um Jar studied

1:03:45architecture at the University of Chile

1:03:47during the early years of the Pino

1:03:49dictatorship. Um memorial at the museum

1:03:53of member and human rights in Santiago

1:03:54uses architectural containment, darkness

1:03:57and illuminated silhouettes to force a

1:03:59physical and collective recogning uh

1:04:02with the dictatorship's victim. Chile

1:04:05consistently produces top architectural

1:04:07talent and example of soft of

1:04:10contemporary work. Uh are there any

1:04:13widely acknowledged influences of jar on

1:04:16architecture at large? And I think this

1:04:18is something that you really discuss in

1:04:19the book and I really wanted to hear

1:04:20from you also.

1:04:22>> Yeah, thank you so much Nick for that

1:04:24question and Nick is an architect so

1:04:26it's great coming from from you. Um I'm

1:04:28showing here and this image is not

1:04:30included in the book unfortunately. This

1:04:32was uh this came to me from the archive

1:04:34of um Isabel Deves who was a classmate

1:04:37of Alfredo Jar at Univers Chile. So Jar

1:04:40um was an architecture student on

1:04:43Univers Chile. And at the time at that

1:04:46university there were two different kind

1:04:48of studios, the creative studio and the

1:04:51more technical studio. and he enrolled

1:04:53in the creative studio with um and then

1:04:56in that creative studio at stake in the

1:04:59teaching was uh that idea that things

1:05:03are never finished

1:05:05uh that things can be made collectively

1:05:08um that um a building can perhaps be

1:05:13something else. And here we see how the

1:05:16students are working together in the

1:05:18building of this chapel

1:05:20uh in the top of this um uh hill in

1:05:24Chile. And it's a chapel that is not

1:05:26aimed to be permanent. It's a chapel

1:05:28that is not aimed to be there forever,

1:05:31but it's something that is meant to be

1:05:34built collectively and then exist, you

1:05:36know, in the transition of time. So uh a

1:05:40lot of his teachers and classmates

1:05:43define their training as an open book.

1:05:46So in the book I I interview a lot of

1:05:49these architects and his classmates and

1:05:52they were all sort of agreeing in the

1:05:53fact that architecture can also be an

1:05:55open book that there is the possibility

1:05:57of urgency, the possibility of this sort

1:06:00of uh ongoing temporal continuity with

1:06:03architecture that in a way contrast with

1:06:07the monumental architecture of the

1:06:09regime. And it was interesting because

1:06:12they were being very critical to the

1:06:15dictatorship but not with an open

1:06:16language. Therefore, they were not

1:06:19punished. Um, creativity in the eyes of

1:06:22the uh military was not seen as a threat

1:06:26because creativity was seen as something

1:06:28you know unrelated to the political. But

1:06:31here if we see this um shape there's

1:06:35nothing really that everything here is

1:06:38sort of a rejection to that fixed

1:06:41mentality of the authoritarian regime

1:06:44and then he finished his studies in

1:06:48architecture. He moved to New York in 19

1:06:51uh 82 thanks for he got a scholarship

1:06:54for the studies of happiness project. He

1:06:57moved to New York. His idea was actually

1:06:59to go to France but he stayed in New

1:07:01York and he started working in an

1:07:02architectural office in New York called

1:07:04site and then after 1985 he got a

1:07:08Guingham fellowship that allowed him to

1:07:10be like a full-time artist and um many

1:07:15of his works as Nick is mentioning are

1:07:19very architectural indeed his own um way

1:07:22of thinking

1:07:24uh comes after that notion that Context

1:07:28is everything for an architect. He says

1:07:30context is everything. So I respond to

1:07:32context to the political context to

1:07:34social context to the urban context to

1:07:37the architectural context. So he built

1:07:39this um environment this buildings in

1:07:42relationship to context. And this is the

1:07:45memorial that Nick is mentioning. Um

1:07:48this is the museum of memory and human

1:07:50rights which was built in Chile um in

1:07:532010 under the um the the presidency of

1:07:57the socialist um uh m Michelle Vachellet

1:08:01and she invited Jar to create a memorial

1:08:03to the victims of the regime and this is

1:08:06what he did. So here you see again this

1:08:10architectural space that is composed of

1:08:13two um mirrors in the continuous walls

1:08:16and then you see all these silhouettes

1:08:19of people that um he you know

1:08:23photographs that he takes from either

1:08:25archives of people who disappeared or

1:08:27died but also from people that are still

1:08:30alive. talking about the fact that

1:08:32victims are not all like talking about

1:08:34that kind of broad understanding of vict

1:08:37of the victim in which um it's an entire

1:08:41nation that is mourning right it's not

1:08:44um kind of all in located in the in the

1:08:47fate of those who die but also in the

1:08:50mothers of the disappeared in the in in

1:08:53in in in human rights organizations in

1:08:55the daughters in the granddaughters in

1:08:58people that are born now. So um here

1:09:00that idea of collective memory is at

1:09:03stake and is um um kind of uh

1:09:07exacerbated with the fact that he placed

1:09:09these two mirrors in the contiguous

1:09:12wall. So those faces, those silhouettes,

1:09:15those

1:09:17those persons are multiplied to

1:09:19infinity. Thinking not only about the

1:09:21collective notion of victimhood, but

1:09:24also the fact of that the dictatorship

1:09:27continued, right? The dictatorship ended

1:09:30formally in the year 1990 when uh

1:09:34Patricio Elwin was elected president

1:09:36formally and everybody always say that

1:09:39the transition in Chile was so

1:09:40democratic because Pinoet gave you know

1:09:44uh the presidency to uh to to to Elwin.

1:09:48But in in indeed and this is something

1:09:50that I learned a few years ago from

1:09:52Peter Conru the journalist who have

1:09:54written extensively about the condor

1:09:56operation and the Pinoet's file. Pinocch

1:09:59was actually planning a coup in 1988

1:10:01when he lost the referendum and he

1:10:04wanted a coup but he didn't have the

1:10:05support of the other military. So that's

1:10:08why he ended up, you know, saying,

1:10:11"Okay, I'm not going to continue, you

1:10:13know, this is dictator, this

1:10:14dictatorship, but I'm going to still be

1:10:17senator per life." Like Pino appointed

1:10:19himself senator per life. So therefore,

1:10:22he will never really be punished because

1:10:25he was protected, right, by by that um

1:10:28by that title. But this is an

1:10:30architectural space, a very minimal

1:10:32architectural space that is um

1:10:34multiplied to infinity through those um

1:10:38mirrors. And the viewer actually um

1:10:41access to that space by um going down 30

1:10:4633 steps. So there's also this sort of

1:10:48construction of different hallways that

1:10:50he always create. There's always this

1:10:52con construction of a theaterlike

1:10:55installation in which the viewer is led

1:10:58to all these spaces and then uh is

1:11:00confronted to different images that

1:11:02sometimes make yourself feel blind

1:11:04because of the the um the the the the

1:11:08the light right that come from those

1:11:10images. So, uh, it's spatial,

1:11:13uh, it's it's a it's a spatial word, but

1:11:16it's also temporal, right, in the in the

1:11:18sort of in the in the in the symbolic

1:11:20meaning of the work.

1:11:24>> Well, thank you, Florencia, for

1:11:25answering these questions. And um we

1:11:28have only a few minutes left. So I

1:11:30wonder if you can if you want to do a

1:11:33final remarks on the book or something

1:11:35that you want to share before we uh

1:11:38depart.

1:11:40Uh no I mean thank you so much Marisol

1:11:43for um uh being in this conversation

1:11:46with me. Thank thank you so much Leslie

1:11:48and thank you Lucy for agreeing to uh

1:11:51come. I'm so sorry that the technology

1:11:54is not always that easy. uh but um she

1:11:57was very helpful in the process of

1:11:59writing the book uh and I am very

1:12:02grateful for the opportunity to talk

1:12:04about the book here uh in the space of

1:12:07Latin American art. Uh it's a book that

1:12:10uh starts from the Americas to think

1:12:12about the world. So I'm very grateful

1:12:15that this is the space in which I can

1:12:17talk about the book.

1:12:21Thank you so much Florencia. If I can

1:12:24just briefly hop on to say this was a

1:12:27wonderful conversation. Thank you for

1:12:30sharing your book with us and with our

1:12:32members. It's I think a an incredibly

1:12:35important and impactful work and I

1:12:37congratulate you on the publication and

1:12:40look forward to hearing about more uh

1:12:42book presentations and um seeing the

1:12:45impact of this work as it unfolds over

1:12:48the years. Um, and thank you so much to

1:12:51Lucy who obviously had we had some

1:12:54difficulties bringing her voice into

1:12:56this mix, but I'm glad that we were at

1:12:58least able to hear a few words from her.

1:13:00Um, and I know how impactful her work

1:13:03has been um to your work, Florencia, and

1:13:06to so many of us. So, it was wonderful

1:13:08to have her be part of this, however

1:13:10briefly. And Marisol, huge gratitude.

1:13:13Thank you so much for joining us and

1:13:15being in conversation with Florenzia.

1:13:17We're so fortunate to have you on our

1:13:19Alla executive committee. Um, and I want

1:13:22to thank everyone who's been here today

1:13:24joining us. We will have the recording

1:13:26of this event up on our YouTube page. If

1:13:28you would like to use it as a reference

1:13:30in the future, we warmly invite you to

1:13:32do so. Please join us for further

1:13:35events. Uh, join Allah. Um, and thank

1:13:38you everyone. Have a wonderful day.

1:13:40>> Thank you.

1:13:42>> Thank you.

Recently added transcripts

Browse the whole transcript library

This transcript was generated from the captions YouTube publishes for this video. Get the transcript of any YouTube video atfreeyoutubetranscribe.com, free, unlimited, no sign-up.