Free YouTube Transcribe

Video transcript

Así se inventó la ESCUELA OBLIGATORIA: el secreto mejor guardado de la educación. #documental

Liberalístico · 6,331 words · 29 min read

Want to search this transcript, jump the video from any line, or download it as TXT, SRT, or VTT?

Open in the transcript tool

Full transcript

Origen de la escolarización obligatoria: Lutero y su carta de 1524.

0:31Wittenberg, 1524. An Augustinian monk writes a letter that will

0:40mark a turning point in the history of education. “Dear rulers of the German lands… I maintain that

0:51civil authorities are under obligation to compel the people to send their children to

0:56school. (…) If the government can compel such citizens as are fit for military service to

1:02bear spear and rifle, to mount ramparts, and perform other martial duties in time of war,

1:10how much more has it a right to compel the people to send their children to school, since

1:16in this case we are warring with the devil…” — Martin Luther, Letter to the Councilmen

1:21of All Cities in Germany (1524) Words signed by Martin Luther—words

1:24that spoke not of literacy or freedom,

1:28but of a real war for the ideological control of the people from their earliest childhood.

1:37Luther did not propose to educate. He proposed to FORCE schooling. To compel every parent

1:46to send their children to school under the threat of fines, punishment, or even prison.

1:54If we can force them to bear arms… we can also force them to bear an idea.

2:03This was how the first system of compulsory public schooling began to take shape.

2:09An extension of military service—designed to mold subjects who were loyal, docile, and obedient.

La Educación en la Grecia Clásica: Atenas vs. Esparta.

2:37The history of the school system is, in reality, the story of how the State managed to take away

2:42from parents and families the control over their own children’s education.

2:50The first signs of compulsory education go back to Ancient Greece. There were two very different

2:55models: on the one hand, Athens, where public schooling did exist, but access was voluntary

3:01and always depended on the decision of each family—an idea in line with Athens’ democratic

3:07spirit. But truly democratic, not like today! On the other hand, there was Sparta, which took

3:15the idea of control to the extreme. There, children were considered outright property of

3:20the State. At the age of seven, families handed them over to the system, which raised them in

3:26what were basically barracks, through a rigid and uniform program. Unlike Athens, in Sparta every

3:32child was treated exactly the same, given the same opportunities, regardless of their background.

3:41The thirst for control always lurks where freedom exists.

3:47And in Athens, it did not take long for voices to rise,

3:51praising the virtues of the Spartan model: a public, equal, compulsory,

3:58and uniform education. One of its most fervent defenders was none other than the brightest

4:05and most ambitious architect of utopias in Athens: Aristocles, better known as Plato.

4:21So captivated was he by order and control that he could not help but envy Sparta’s iron discipline.

4:33But in a society like Athens—where critical thought upheld the very foundations of its

4:38democracy—they soon understood that freedom cannot survive within a system built on coercion.

5:04In his works The Republic, and also The Laws, Plato imagines his “perfect State.” What he

5:10actually describes is basically Sparta… only a bit more refined: a system of compulsory

5:15instruction where people belong to the State, private property doesn’t exist, and personal

5:21ties are suppressed—especially the family, which he saw as a threat to political unity. He wanted

5:31to dissolve the family, to eliminate loyalties and affections that could compete with the State.

5:36Everything—absolutely everything—had to serve a single goal: shaping citizens trained in the civic

5:44values the State itself defined as desirable. And here’s the thing: for Plato, anything the

5:50State did was justified. Even lying. Yes, yes… lying as an educational method seemed entirely

5:59legitimate to him. According to Plato, to educate was to create convincing narratives

6:04that justified the State’s impositions—even if they weren’t true. He called them “noble

6:08lies” (γενναῖον ψεῦδος, gennaion pseudos). For him, the important thing was not truth,

6:12but maintaining control and order.

6:21The Spartan model—rigid, equal, and compulsory—could

6:25not withstand the passage of time. The human soul, born for freedom,

6:34cannot long endure the chains of imposed duty. It was the Athenian model—free, voluntary,

6:42and unequal—that survived, crossing centuries of empires, wars, and doctrines. And despite

6:51the many attempts to subjugate it, education remained free for more than two thousand years.

Educación en la Edad Media: familias, gremios e Iglesia.

7:05It was conceived as a profoundly human act… the purest expression of freedom:

7:12to decide which learnings had shaped your life, to pass them on to your children,

7:18and to trust others to transmit those things you yourself might have wished to receive.

7:28During the Middle Ages, schools were mainly in the hands of the Church or of private teachers

7:28who offered their services in exchange for money, of course. Anyone with knowledge could

7:28teach children in a neighborhood or a village to read and write—as long as their parents wanted it,

7:28of course. No state permission or diploma was needed. Kings and

7:28governments didn’t interfere in education. Wealthier families would hire a teacher for

7:28their own children, while poorer families would organize in groups of neighbors,

7:28or a single teacher might teach all the children in a village. But there were also works of charity

7:28that offered free instruction in parishes and convents. In fact, it was very common

7:28for poor or orphaned children in the cities to receive basic education without paying,

7:28as part of Christian charity. That’s why teachers were often priests, monks, or nuns, who saw this

7:29work as part of their religious vocation. Most often, families contributed to their

7:29children’s education as much as they could. But never by imposition—always by choice.

7:29It’s true that education wasn’t compulsory, but it wasn’t guaranteed either. It was up

7:29to parents or students themselves to work, to look for alternatives, ask for favors,

7:29and take on commitments in return. Lives became intertwined through voluntary

7:29commitments and reciprocal favors. Human networks forged in trust, in the shared value of knowledge,

7:29and in the genuine desire to learn. There were no universal rights or

7:29obligations—only free agreements, sealed by a word, between those who offered their knowledge…

7:29and those willing to strive to receive it. There were as many possibilities as there

7:29were voluntary agreements to be made. During the Middle Ages, schools were mainly run

7:32by the Church, or by private teachers who offered their services for money — obviously. Anyone with

7:39knowledge could teach children in a neighborhood or a village how to read and write, as long as

7:43their parents agreed, of course. But there was no need for a royal permit, or a government license.

7:50Kings and rulers didn’t interfere in education. Wealthier families would hire a teacher for

7:56their children, while poorer families would pool resources with neighbors,

8:00or bring in a teacher for all the children in the village. There were also charitable

8:06works that offered free instruction in parishes and convents. In fact, it was very common for

8:12poor or orphaned children — especially in the cities — to receive basic education for free,

8:18as part of Christian charity. That’s why so many teachers were priests, monks, or nuns, who saw

8:24this task as part of their religious vocation. Most often, families contributed to their

8:32children’s education as best they could. But never by imposition — it was always voluntary!

8:39It’s true that education wasn’t compulsory… but it also wasn’t guaranteed. Parents and

8:45students had to find solutions, ask for help, make deals, and commit to exchange favors in return.

9:56In the poorest areas, many parents didn’t want to send their children to school. Kids were a

10:01source of labor — sometimes essential for the family’s survival. It was common for children

10:07to attend classes only on certain days, or in certain seasons, when there was no work

10:12in the fields or the workshop. Many learned the family trade from an early age, especially among

10:18artisans or merchants. That way, they inherited the tools, the shop, the clientele, and the

10:24family’s reputation — which was no small thing. And if a child showed talent for something else,

10:30or wanted to learn a different craft, there was the path of the apprentice. They lived and

10:35worked with a master craftsman in exchange for food, lodging, and training — and, of course,

10:41guaranteed hands-on practice. For many young people, it was the way out of the countryside:

10:52you could apprentice as a seamstress, a midwife, a clockmaker, a carpenter…

10:56you could even apprentice to a notary. In the end, everyone carved out a path

11:01as best they could, according to their skills, their abilities, and the opportunities they could

11:05grasp. But there were also many children who never escaped absolute poverty — orphans in rural areas,

11:13or kids from families with no land. For them, the only way out was for parents to give their

11:19children to the Church, into a monastery or convent, where they would be trained

11:24and educated… in exchange for a lifetime of service. They gave away the only thing

11:31they had — their time, their life. But it’s important to understand:

11:36for people in the Middle Ages, “lack of education” was not really the problem. That’s something we

11:42only see as a problem today. For them, the real problem — with capital letters — was

11:48the lack of food and resources. It would take centuries, until human ingenuity made

11:54food more abundant… and literacy stopped being a privilege, to become a useful tool for everyone.

12:11In the Middle Ages, family, survival, and defense were the pillars of life. Time was

12:19a precious good, and every hour had to be spent working… just to stay alive.

12:28Knowledge was not measured in titles or diplomas, but in something far simpler:

12:34useful or useless. And only each person could know what was truly useful in their own circumstances.

12:43Learning to read or write was not valuable in itself; it was so only for a few. For most,

12:53it was far more urgent to learn how to build a house, to sew, to fish, or to cultivate the land.

Educación medieval: hombres vs. mujeres.

13:04Reading and writing were useful skills on three fronts: in religious life,

13:09as a strategic resource in war, and for practicing certain trades—notaries,

13:14officials, merchants… In all these cases, men had the advantage.

13:19In the Church, men could rise higher in the hierarchy. In the army, a soldier who

13:24could read and write was far more valuable, which increased his chances of survival. Rulers knew it:

13:31they could trust him with orders, reports, or maps… and that could decide the outcome of a war.

13:38Women, who neither went to war nor worked in the hard trades of the time—many of which depended

13:44on sheer physical strength—found more use in other kinds of learning: managing the household economy,

13:50raising children, and running an efficient home. Back then, domestic tasks were not seen

13:56as minor at all. Not to mention bearing children, which was their main work. And

14:03that’s exactly how society understood it. Keep in mind that child mortality in those days was around

14:0950% in the first five years. The survival of the family—and education too—depended on women.

14:20In medieval Europe, wherever records exist, male literacy doubled—and even tripled—that of women.

14:28A difference marked not by intelligence, but by necessity and by the usefulness of

14:35a resource that was exceedingly scarce. But among the elites, the story was very

14:43different. The gap between men and women narrowed dramatically. Wealth and economic prosperity were

14:52the keys that opened the doors of knowledge. Many noble women—such as Hildegard of Bingen,

14:59Christine de Pizan, Matilda of Canossa, Héloïse of Argenteuil, or Eleanor of Aquitaine,

15:06among many others—received an extraordinary education for their time. They became physicians,

15:13politicians, composers, writers, theologians… advisors to popes, kings, and emperors.

15:22In their world, the true limit was not sex… it was scarcity.

15:33Basic education meant teaching children to read, write, and do simple arithmetic. But

Datos de alfabetización en Europa.

15:39as knowledge became more specialized—like Latin, logic, philosophy, or law—the cost rose sharply,

15:46because very few people could teach it, and books, ink, parchment… all of that was expensive.

15:54By the late Middle Ages, in the 15th century, the average literacy rate in Europe was around 15%

16:00for men in urban areas, and barely 5% for women. In very prosperous cities like Florence, Venice,

16:07or Bruges, the numbers were higher: nearly 30% of men and around 10% of women could read and write.

16:14But in rural areas, literacy barely reached 2%. Where there was more economic activity,

16:21there was more wealth—and it was that wealth that made education possible.

16:25And look here: in this chart you can clearly see how, starting in the 16th century,

16:30literacy rates in Europe began to rise… until they reached the 99% we have today.

16:46Sometimes, great changes do not begin with plans or strategy, but with a small gesture

El contexto de Lutero y la Reforma.

16:52that no one deems significant… until it completely transforms a society.

17:02On All Hallows’ Eve of 1517, in the silence of Wittenberg, an Augustinian monk approached

17:10the church door with a parchment in one hand and a hammer in the other.

17:18Martin Luther nailed there his 95 Theses: they were not mere complaints… they were a direct

17:25challenge to the greatest authority of his time—the Catholic Church.

17:32In them he not only denounced the sale of indulgences and the corruption of

17:36high offices… he dared to defy the Pope of Rome himself, questioning his authority and

17:46denying his right to grant God’s forgiveness. Even before the Protestant Reformation broke out,

17:55Europe was already steeped in a strong climate of criticism toward the Church. Corruption was

18:00obvious: ecclesiastical offices were bought and sold, and everybody knew it. On top of that,

18:06the clergy lived in great ostentation while demanding tithes and charity from believers.

18:12But the trigger that would finally provoke the rupture was the sale of indulgences:

18:16granting forgiveness of sins… in exchange for money. At that point, indulgences had turned into

18:22a multimillion-dollar business for the Church. According to historians like Köhler or Cameron,

18:29at the start of the 16th century indulgences made up around 10% of the Church’s total income. In

18:36some campaigns they even surpassed the annual revenues of the tithe.

18:40But the most scandalous case took place in the two years before Luther published

18:46his 95 Theses. Between 1515 and 1517, Pope Leo X authorized a massive indulgence campaign in the

18:54Holy Roman Empire to finance the construction of St. Peter’s Basilica… and, incidentally, to

19:00settle some of his personal debts. That campaign ended up representing between 40 and 50% of the

19:08Church’s income during those two years, collecting tens of thousands of florins across the Empire.

19:14And as in every big business, there were bankers behind it. Families like the Fuggers, the Welsers,

19:21and the Medicis managed the flow of money—and of course, took their share. Because indulgences

19:26had very little left of a spiritual act; they were, in fact, a first-rate financial operation.

19:35In a world where money could not be conjured out of nothing, selling God’s forgiveness was an

19:41immensely lucrative business—for those who held the monopoly on truth and the keys to heaven.

19:48But at the University of Wittenberg, a young professor and Augustinian monk, concerned for

19:54the salvation of his soul, chose not to take part in the business—and to protest instead.

20:05After earning a doctorate in theology and years of studying the Holy Scriptures,

20:10he reached a conviction that clashed head-on with Rome: salvation and God’s forgiveness could not be

20:17bought with gold or with a handful of florins… they could only be attained through faith.

20:24Martin Luther dared to do the unthinkable: to think for himself, to question dogmas, and to

20:32defy the most powerful authority of his age. By nailing his 95 Theses to the door of the

20:40Wittenberg church, he opened a debate that would set Europe ablaze… and he did so by

20:47using precisely what, years later, he himself would try to prevent others from using again:

20:57the ability to question the established order. No one understood better than

21:04he the reach and the immense power of free thought—nor the magnitude of the earthquake

21:11that disobedience could unleash in the foundations of any structure of power.

El primer Sistema Educativo Estatal.

21:17In 1524, he wrote a letter to the rulers of the Holy Roman Empire to persuade them

21:23to impose public schools with compulsory attendance. There, every child would learn

21:30to read and write… but above all, they would be indoctrinated to fight the “ideas of the

21:36devil,” to think as good Christians, and to serve as loyal subjects of the Empire.

21:48Thus began a new chapter in the history of humanity: education as a tool of state

21:55control—a story of imposition, uniformity, and the repression of that which the powerful fear

22:05above all else: independent thought. Despite what people might think,

22:16the roots of all modern state school systems are not in Sparta or in classical Greece.

22:22The current model was born in the 16th century, with Luther and, especially, with his right hand,

22:29Philip Melanchthon. They were the ones who designed the first modern state education plan.

22:35And we have no evidence whatsoever to suggest that either of them might have

22:38taken the Spartan model as a reference or inspiration—though the similarities are striking.

22:44The historical continuity of the Prussian model of education, from Luther’s time until today,

22:50is perfectly documented. In both Europe and America, the traceability of the model

22:55can be followed without interruption or gaps—and we can also track it into Asia.

23:01Japan imported the model in the late 19th century during the Meiji Restoration, fascinated by the

23:08discipline, obedience, and military efficiency it produced. Soon after, following the fall of

23:14the Qing dynasty, China imported it as well. And many other Asian countries adopted it

23:20through European colonization—by the British, French, or Dutch—or simply by copying Japan.

23:27In every case we find the same system, with slight adjustments but no substantial changes. Even the

23:35so-called “modern methodologies” or “active pedagogies” sold to us today as educational

23:42innovation are nothing new… they’ve been on the table for over two centuries.

23:47In fact, their origin goes back to the 18th century, when Rousseau and Pestalozzi fiercely

23:53criticized the state model and defended an education focused on the integral development of

23:59the individual—placing the child at the center of learning, fostering active participation,

24:05and encouraging autonomy. And I’m not putting this in modern words… those were their very words.

La educación al servicio del Estado.

24:22From the days of Athens to the dawn of the sixteenth century, education was a

24:27responsibility shared by families, communities, and teachers. A pact of trust… not of coercion.

24:39Luther realized something very important: that if he had the coercive power of the

24:39State on his side, he could confront—and even defeat—the Pope of Rome himself. Keep in mind,

24:39we’re talking about the early 16th century, when the Church held the monopoly on good and evil.

24:39And of course, this was deeply troubling for rulers, who wanted to govern in their own way.

24:39But if Rome withheld its blessing, they had a huge problem—because the Pope could declare them

24:39traitors, tyrants, or, even worse, heretics. And that was practically a death sentence.

24:39The Church acted as a counterweight, as a brake on the power of rulers. And

24:39Luther saw the chance to tip that balance. Luther offered princes and kings something

24:42irresistible: the fall of the Pope of Rome… and with it, absolute control

24:50over the legitimacy of their actions. The power to control truth, good, and evil.

24:58Absolutism was beginning to take shape. He promised to forge loyal, obedient,

25:04and disciplined subjects—men and women who would not only pay more taxes… but do so willingly,

25:14convinced it was their duty as good citizens. He offered rulers the most efficient armies ever

25:21seen, able to communicate in writing—a formidable tactical advantage at that

25:28time—and a meticulously ordered society, where everyone shared a single story:

25:37a convincing narrative proclaiming the State as the only source of legitimacy.

25:44Luther saw in compulsory schooling the tool of social and ideological control he needed

25:50to domesticate thought, to standardize belief, and to command the human will.

26:06The princes accepted the deal. They gave Luther resources, inspectors, soldiers… and, of course,

26:13a share of the new taxes they would collect thanks to the “brand-new” schools. Because

26:18with the Church out of the way, if the State was now offering Public Education, taxes had

26:24to go up. Whether people were forced into it or had never asked for it—that was beside the point…

26:30At first, they sold it as just a simple change of hands: what was no longer paid

26:35to Rome would now be paid to the State—plus “a little extra” to cover education.

26:40But in practice, taxes went up dramatically. We don’t have exact figures, since there weren’t

26:45yet officials recording everything, but there’s more than enough historical evidence to say that

26:51setting up this whole system brought an enormous extra cost to the State—and that meant constant

26:58tax hikes and more than one peasant revolt. And while Luther would rather have burned at

27:04the stake the parents who refused to send their children to school, the princes—being

27:09more “practical”—chose to keep them alive and fine them with ever-higher penalties. They were

27:15only killed if they failed to pay their taxes. Basically, people were told they were being freed

27:20from the chains of Rome so they could save their souls and reach heaven. They were forced to send

27:26their children to school to save them from the devil. And their taxes were raised. They were

27:31freed from Rome and bound to the State—but that last part was not in the official narrative.

27:37And then, year after year, taxes kept going up, to pay for more inspectors and more administrators,

27:44who could issue more fines and coordinate the whole system. And everyone was happy,

27:47because that was what it meant to be a “good” citizen—and nobody wants to be a “bad” one.

27:54In 1524, the very year Luther wrote his letter, the first Lutheran public schools were founded

28:02in Gotha. In the autumn of 1528, Luther and his disciple Philip Melanchthon published the

El primer Plan Educativo Estatal: Lutero y Melanchthon

28:13Saxon School Plan: the first fully systematic program of education, planned and designed to

28:20educate the entire population equally. From then on, it would be the State that

28:29determined what must be learned, who could teach it, how, when, where, for what purpose,

28:38and with what arguments it should be justified. The gears of the first state education system were

28:46already in motion. All that remained was to impose it by force on the whole population.

28:55And they did not have to wait long. In 1529, at the castle of Stuttgart, the Duke of Württemberg

29:04enacted the first education law requiring all boys to attend school. From then on, schools began to

29:14keep attendance records, educational inspectors were appointed to oversee the enforcement of

29:21content, and parents who failed to comply with their duty were fined or even imprisoned.

29:34School became a civic duty, a political obligation that came before military service. In the years

29:45that followed, public schools were created in every town and village of the Holy Roman Empire.

29:52The public and compulsory school system designed by Luther and Melanchthon began

29:58to spread and take root throughout the empire… like a web woven from power.

30:14Melanchthon was the first to talk about curriculum design and to build an entire pedagogy that was

30:22completely systematized—very, very similar to what we have today in any school system,

30:27even the Finnish one that gets so much praise. In reality, they’re all extremely similar,

30:32because they’re systems for “educating”… which, I think, should already sound

30:37pretty disturbing, to be honest! But anyway… What Melanchthon did to design his education

30:42system was to structure all the content into subject-based curricula, exactly as we do now.

30:50Each subject was organized and sequenced into different courses based on the students’ age,

30:55and on the learning objectives that had been previously defined for each age.

31:03Melanchthon was the first to imagine something that until then would have seemed unthinkable:

31:11a fully systematic program of education, carefully planned and designed to educate

31:17the entire population equally. Everyone, without exception. An education system

31:25capable of uniting all under the same values and, of course, the same faith: the Lutheran one.

31:34Both Melanchthon and Luther didn’t see people—they saw a collective, a mass. They weren’t thinking

31:40about the well-being of children as individuals; they saw them as cogs in a system, as if they

31:46were screws. So he thought that if he applied the same education plan to all children, even though

31:53they were different, he would manage to implant a single system of moral and civic values that,

31:58for the first time, would be under control. Under the control of the State, to be precise.

Absolutismo: todo bajo control del Estado.

32:09CONTROL was the real problem. A problem Luther understood to perfection. He himself had managed

32:19to dethrone the Supreme Pontiff, fracture Europe, and forever alter the rules of the

32:24political game… armed only with critical thought and the audacity to question established power.

32:33That is why what had given him victory… was also what he feared the most.

32:40How could one dominate a system of social values that, by nature,

32:44is diverse, unpredictable, and decentralized? The only way was to chain it: to turn it into

32:53a single, uniform model, subjected to an official morality that guaranteed blind

32:59obedience to the laws dictated by power. Thus, all dissent—political, religious,

33:06or personal—could be stifled before it was even born.

33:12The State and the Lutheran Church were then welded together into a

33:16single structure of power… two faces of the same coin, inseparable and indivisible.

33:25“The lasting value of Luther’s appeal of 1524 was not so much its direct effect,

33:31as the sacred associations which it established in Germany between national religion and the

33:36educational duty of the individual and the state. Thus, without doubt,

33:41there was created that sound public opinion which made the principle of compulsory school

33:45attendance easy of acceptance in Prussia.” — A.E. Twentyman, “Education; Germany”,

33:50Encyclopaedia Britannica, 14th ed., vol. 7, pp. 999–1000.

33:52That was the very goal pursued by the world’s first systems of state schooling:

33:57the school as a lever of social control, a tool of the State to shape consciences and guarantee the

34:04religious and political unity of the nation. The underlying message was simple: be quiet,

34:11obey… and send your children to school so they can learn to be quiet and obey even better.

34:17Anyone who has kids knows this: children are the strictest guardians of the rules they’ve

34:22been taught. If you tell them “you don’t cross on red,” and one day you do it in front of them,

34:27you don’t need the police to stop you—the child will scold you. For him, that rule is absolute,

34:33because that’s how you passed it on: without nuance, without context.

34:38Adults, on the other hand, know that some rules depend on circumstances: if the street is empty,

34:43crossing on red might not be dangerous. But the child’s prefrontal cortex—the part of the

34:49brain responsible for analyzing, evaluating, and making decisions—is not yet fully developed. So

34:56they interpret the world in a rigid, literal way. Learning up to the age of eight is based mainly

35:02on the internalization of rules, learned through imitation, repetition, and emotional association.

35:08The child learns: “red = don’t cross.” To educate would be to teach them why the

35:14traffic light exists, and to help them assess when the rule is useful and when it isn’t. To

35:20indoctrinate is simply to say: “don’t cross because it’s red,” and leave it at that.

35:25And that’s what happens: when you teach only to obey rules, and not to understand them,

35:31dogmas are built generation after generation—dogmas that, over time,

35:36become unquestionable. Each generation ends up a little more submissive than the

35:40last. There comes a point when obedience turns into an automatic act, and questioning becomes

35:45uncomfortable—because we’ve been taught to avoid debate, instead of seeing it as

35:49the most natural way to learn. In fact, that’s what it means to think critically:

35:55to put your own ideas to the test, to see if they really hold up against external criticism.

36:06Melanchthon’s idea was masterful: he designed a system in which citizens had to be convinced

36:13that education is the highest priority… and that, above all, they must trust the system,

36:22trust the institutions of the State, and follow the rules.

36:30“Only obedience to the laws ordained by the state will

36:34protect you from chaos and savagery.” — Martin Luther, Temporal Authority:

36:40To What Extent It Should Be Obeyed (1523), trans. W. I. Brandt, Fortress Press, 1962.

36:40Once the system was set in motion, it no longer needed to be enforced by force:

36:47the machinery would move on its own. The school would produce docile citizens and

36:54faithful Lutheran subjects, convinced that they were freely choosing what was right.

37:00Thus, the system perpetuated itself, generation after generation… with citizens

37:07ever more obedient, more compliant, and—paradoxically—far more educated.

37:18“Luther stamped upon his party that character of political dependence

37:23and that habit of passive obedience to the State which it has ever since retained.”

Consecuencias de la escolarización: pros y contras.

37:31— John, Lord Acton, The Protestant Theory of Persecution, in Essays on Freedom and Power

37:31(Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press, 1948), p. 94. The consequences of Luther’s system were

37:33enormous. It took off like a rocket. In rural areas of the Holy Roman Empire,

37:38where barely 2% of the population could read and write at the start of the 16th century,

37:44literacy rose to nearly 35% by the mid-17th. And in the cities, which started around 25%,

37:51it wasn’t unusual to see rates above 60% by the early 18th century. And they

37:57kept climbing to levels never seen before. And that had an immediate effect on the army.

38:03Suddenly, soldiers could read orders, interpret maps, and coordinate far more efficiently. They

38:08no longer depended so much on a captain shouting what they had to do—they could receive detailed

38:13instructions in writing, even from a distance. The result was that the armies of the Holy Roman

38:19Empire, and later of Prussia, became far more precise and lethal machines. An educated soldier

38:26doesn’t just shoot better—he obeys better. And for those in power… that was pure gold.

38:42The establishment of the school system also worked its magic on the economy:

38:47revenues grew enormously, wealth multiplied, and the productivity of each worker reached

38:54new heights. But none of this escaped the watchful eye of the State… which,

39:00like a jealous guardian, kept every fruit of that progress under its control.

39:08Keep in mind that, almost overnight, peasants could read and write. They had access to

39:13technical manuals, could measure land, calculate proportions… Apprentices in workshops could now

39:19follow written instructions and replicate designs directly from a sheet of paper.

39:24This new ability to communicate in writing, and to do so asynchronously,

39:28not only improved agriculture and multiplied the productivity of craft workshops, it also

39:33laid the foundation for a transition toward far more complex industries.

39:37In the Holy Roman Empire, large textile industries began to flourish, iron

39:41foundries started producing standardized parts, printing presses expanded, and shipyards

39:46multiplied. Over time, this entire productive fabric gave rise to machinery industries,

39:51to engineering — and, in later centuries, to the manufacture of vehicles and advanced weaponry.

40:00As the spoken word was replaced by the written word, the power of the State grew. Now everything

40:08was recorded and signed. Taxes were collected with precision, fraud and evasion reached historic

40:16lows. And it became ever harder to escape the gaze—and the collecting hand—of the State.

40:28Tax revenues kept climbing nonstop through the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries… and

40:33the nineteenth and twentieth were worse. Meanwhile, the State kept growing. As it

40:39expanded and took on more roles, it had to hire more officials.

40:43Soon there was an army of bureaucrats who, of course, needed

40:46their diplomas certified by the State itself. And to keep them all on the payroll… more taxes.

40:53And that’s how this loop began — the one we’re still in today.

Sistema prusiano: escuela, burocracia y ejército.

41:02In 1763, Frederick the Great extended compulsory primary education to girls as well. He conceived

41:10education and the army as the two great pillars upon which Prussian identity had to be built.

41:20Prussia achieved something unprecedented: a national, centralized, and perfectly articulated

41:28system, where school, bureaucracy, and army were interwoven like the gears of a single machine

41:35of discipline. A model carefully designed and coordinated to maintain control over the moral

41:45values that govern society, to align wills, to standardize thought, and to turn each citizen

41:54into a functional piece of the state apparatus. Education thus became the factory of citizens

42:05in the service of the State. “An instructed and literate

42:11people can be governed with greater ease.” — Frederick II of Prussia (Frederick the Great),

42:21Political Testament (c. 1752–1768) But this domination had to be presented

42:23as an act of benevolence. The State did not only demand obedience… it needed you to believe that

42:31you obeyed for your own good, that you should even end up thanking them for it. After all,

42:40they were the wise ones—the ones who had taught you how to think, the ones who had shaped every

42:47idea that inhabits your mind. If everything you knew had been taught to you by them,

42:52if everything you are today you owed to them… how could you ever think they might be wrong?

43:00How could you even doubt that they had the right—and the duty—to decide for you?

43:06The perfect trick: to convince you that your

43:11freedom was safer in their hands than in your own.

43:17"The prince is to the nation he governs what the head is to man; his duty is to see,

43:24think, and act for the whole community." — Frederick the Great, Political Testament (1752)

43:33After Prussia’s defeat at the hands of Napoleon in 1806, Frederick William III

43:38interpreted the disaster as a warning. If the State wished to be strong again,

43:45it had to start at the root: education. That same year, his minister vom Stein

43:54pushed through a radical reform. He abolished all remaining private schools

44:01and placed all education under the direct control of the Ministry of the Interior.

44:09In 1810 it was decreed that all teachers had to pass an official State exam,

44:18and in 1812 a compulsory graduation test was established for children to leave the school

44:24system—if they failed, they could not exit the system. The body of school inspectors was also

44:36expanded, charged with ensuring that everything conformed exactly to what the State dictated.

44:45In 1814, after Napoleon was defeated, Prussia introduced, for the very first time, compulsory

44:52service for all young men. But since they could not go beyond the official cap of forty-two

44:57thousand soldiers set by the Congress of Vienna, they created a system known as the Krümpersystem.

45:05Every year they trained forty-two thousand recruits, kept them in service for twelve months

45:09— just enough to prepare them fully — then sent them home as reservists, bringing in a new batch.

45:16In just a few years they had hundreds of thousands of men well trained and ready for mobilization

45:22at any moment. The Prussian model of schooling acted as the antechamber of the army. From the

45:30classroom they instilled discipline, obedience, loyalty to the nation, history, mathematics,

45:36and practical skills useful for artillery, logistics, or engineering. The schoolroom was,

45:43in truth, the first barracks. By 1834, no one in Prussia

45:53could access a skilled job without the corresponding diploma issued by the State.

46:03It was even forbidden for a company or a family to hire a professional without State approval. From

46:11that moment on, they would not only control the future soldier, but also the future judge, notary,

46:18teacher, doctor, lawyer, civil servant… The future of every citizen lay in their hands. And

46:28submission to the State was no longer a virtue—it became the only condition for social existence.

46:41People’s lives got much better, at least when it came to money—no question about that.

46:46But the cost was high: every day they were under tighter control, with less

46:51room to decide and less freedom to live. The ones who reaped the real rewards were

46:55the rulers—more wealth, more power, more than ever before.

47:01The results looked so impressive that others rushed to copy them.

Calvino y la expansión del modelo en Europa y América.

47:05The first was Calvin, who in 1536—just ten years after Luther launched his

47:11Saxon Education Plan—built in Geneva a system almost the same, only tougher and stricter.

47:23Calvin’s influence spread even further than Luther’s, weaving a network that reached

47:29every corner of Europe. Geneva became the beating heart of Calvinism, a beacon that drew students,

47:39scholars, and the curious from across the continent. With every traveler who

47:45returned home, his educational model spread. In Scotland, John Knox founded the Presbyterian

48:05Church and sought to build a network of schools in every village; in France, the Huguenots demanded

48:15universal education; and in Navarre, Queen Jeanne d’Albret imposed it by decree. Calvinist

48:26Holland followed the same path in 1609. But Calvin’s mark did not stop in Europe.

48:39It crossed the ocean with the Puritans to New England, where the first public and

48:44compulsory education system of America took root… a model that, from there,

48:50would expand until it embraced the entire world. Today, the State claims full control of education,

Reflexión final.

49:02even calling it a “lever of social change,” with all the risks that such power brings. A lever,

49:10after all, exists to multiply the force behind it. The danger is clear:

49:18if only the State holds that lever, then it holds the moral ground itself, and we must remember, the

49:27will of the State is nothing more than the will of those few who seize and steer its machinery.

49:35We have let the debate on education shrink into arguing which system to impose on everyone,

49:42instead of realizing that such an imposition is not only needless, but deeply dangerous.

49:49This is no small matter, for once we surrender the right to teach our own children,

49:57what remains to be done when the State, quite simply, fails to teach?

Recently added transcripts

Browse the whole transcript library

This transcript was generated from the captions YouTube publishes for this video. Get the transcript of any YouTube video atfreeyoutubetranscribe.com, free, unlimited, no sign-up.