Free YouTube Transcribe

Video transcript

Will AI Replace Lawyers? Harvard Professor on the Future of Law

IE Insights · 1,849 words · 9 min read

Want to search this transcript, jump the video from any line, or download it as TXT, SRT, or VTT?

Open in the transcript tool

Full transcript

Introduction

0:00Democracy and the rule of law is a relatively recent

0:03and always fragile enterprise.

0:06Dictators and autocrats have figured out that they can use the rule of law

0:12to their advantage.

0:20Hello, David.

0:21Good afternoon.

0:22It's a pleasure to have the opportunity to chat with you today.

0:25And I'd like to take this opportunity to talk about the trends in the legal market.

0:31And there are three items, three things that I would like to comment with you.

0:35The first one, of course, is AI,

0:38the second one is the rule of law,

0:41and the third one is legal education.

AI's Impact on Legal Services

0:45So starting with the most obvious one,

0:48AI, how do you think AI will impact two different things:

0:53one is the demand, the need, the request for legal services.

1:00Will we see in the future

1:02higher or less need for legal services?

1:06And the second one is who will deliver these legal services?

1:10Will the law firms the general functions that

1:13the lawyers or what is your opinion on this.

1:16So thank you, Soledad.

1:17It's a great pleasure to be here.

1:19And if I knew the answers to those questions, I would be extremely rich.

1:24The fact of the matter is, no one really knows the answers

1:27to those questions.

1:28We are in the Stone Age of what,

1:32by almost any definition, is going to be the most transformative

1:37technological revolution I don't know, since

1:41electricity or something like that, and maybe even more.

1:45In the short term,

1:48generative AI and these new technologies will be,

1:53roughly speaking, a welfare act for lawyers.

1:56Which means every single aspect of these

2:01new technologies will be litigated.

2:04Right?

2:04Intellectual property: who owns the content?

2:08Who's responsible for hallucinations?

2:11It will be regulated at multiple levels and conflicting levels, in which only

2:17lawyers will be able to figure out and help clients to sort through.

2:23So this is going to create

2:27an explosion of demand around legal services

2:32relating to these new technologies.

2:35That's a kind of short term first order effect.

2:39Second, people are already

2:43and will increasingly look for ways

2:46to use these new technologies

2:50to both supplement

2:53and replace demand.

2:56That is, you will see lots of legal services

3:01providers, they've gone from a posture of banning everyone from

3:05using them to now trying to figure out how to use them

3:09to increase their efficiency, their productivity,

3:12their profitability.

3:15There is no question that, like all technologies,

3:19they will also replace

3:22the need for some human work

3:26that is currently done by human legal professionals, the kinds of tasks

3:32that, quite frankly, you never needed a law degree to do anyway, like reading

3:37documents, doing basic kinds of drafting, basic kinds of research.

3:42Who are most at risk are not junior level people,

3:46but there are mid-level partners

3:51who do not have their own book of business

3:54and who do narrow technical specialties.

3:58Because ChatGPT is already

4:00very good at that, and it will only get exponentially better.

4:05Last point, who will do these services?

4:09As the provision of services

4:12moves to what can be learned from

4:16crunching large amounts of data

4:19by sophisticated and capable machines.

4:25That is not the exclusive

4:27province of people who go to law school,

4:31and therefore we are going to see

4:34an explosion of the providers who are providing services

4:40at the intersection of law, technology, strategy,

4:43psychology, human resources.

4:46All of these things are now an increasingly contested

4:50domain with lots of potential providers.

4:53So I guess that as we have seen before,

4:57every revolution, every relevant transformation of society has had,

5:02as a result, a demand and a request for more legal services.

5:07Uncertainty calls for more demand of legal services.

Will Lawyers Benefit From AI?

5:11Now, the question with this AI revolution is

5:14how will the legal services providers

5:17benefit from the use of this technology in order to still be the ones

5:22who provide these services_ So that's one way to look at the problem.

5:26A different way to look at the problem is how are individuals

5:31and organizations of all kind going to deal with increasing

5:34uncertainty, of which law is a piece but only a piece?

5:38And so I think just like you have seen in lots of other fields,

5:42you're going to see an explosion in what you might call do-it-yourself services.

5:48Direct access, direct business-to-consumer access to services.

5:53You're likely to see big organizations

5:57wrapping legal into other products they provide.

6:02Like you want a mortgage.

6:03Well, right now you go to a bank and then you go to a lawyer.

6:07Why is it that you might not be able to have the legal services around

6:12buying and selling real estate wrapped into products

6:15that are sold by mortgage companies or banks?

6:19Now there's a regulatory set of questions that sits on top of that.

6:24But as we have found out over time, regulation

6:28rarely stops innovation.

6:31It may slow down the pace of it.

6:33It may divert it.

6:34when back to your first point, there's a big demand

6:39for not only a particular service,

6:42but managing complex transactions in an increasingly complex

6:48and volatile world as quickly and efficiently as possible.

6:52So law is not the only solution, but it's part of the solution.

6:56I believe that law should be at the center

6:59of the debate around the use of AI, the ethical use of AI

7:04and the use of AI in the benefit of society.

7:08Lawyers, law students and legal academics should not wait

7:12for the big tech companies to make all the decisions.

7:15They should be more at the forefront of the debate.

7:19And this drives me to the second point, which is the rule of law,

7:24what we are seeing around the world now and what we have seen in in

7:28several regions is that the situation, the respect of the rule of law,

Can the Rule of Law Protect Democracy?

7:33can change in a shorter period of time than we would have thought of.

7:38And we have seen governments take over and regimes take over.

7:43We have seen decisions being made around institutions,

7:47and we have seen how fast these can have an impact in society,

7:52in the lives of citizens and human rights.

7:56What do you think is at risk here?

7:58What do you think is the responsibility of law schools,

8:01and how far should law schools and legal academics go?

8:05Democracy, the rule of law, is a relatively recent

8:09and always fragile enterprise.

8:13Most of the world, for most of humankind, has been ruled

8:17by kings and dictators and other forms of autocrats.

8:21The difference, I think, today is that

8:24we associate autocracy with the opposite of the rule of law,

8:30that dictators don't want law.

8:33But in fact, what we have seen

8:36is that dictators and autocrats have figured out

8:40that they can use the rule of law to their advantage.

8:44So legal autocracy used to be an oxymoron.

8:49It's now something that we have seen

8:52in various places in Europe, in Latin America,

8:56and certainly the risk of it

8:59in my own country at the moment.

9:02So the rule of law

9:07is an understanding about

9:11the use of law and legal institutions,

9:15which can be put to many different purposes.

9:18As legal educators, we are used to thinking of ourselves

9:24as the first line and last important line of defense of the rule of law.

9:30And that is true.

9:32But it's also true that we have seen lawyers

9:35undermining the very rule of law that they were designed to protect.

9:40The third point is

9:43what is the role of legal education

9:49in an environment in which law is a part,

9:54but only a part of the complex

9:57web of large-scale

10:00trends like technology and globalization and demographic

10:05change and geopolitical instability.

10:09Law schools need to be much more engaged

10:14in helping their graduates and their faculties

10:21and the society as a whole

10:24understand the complex interdependence

10:27of these large-scale forces for the preservation

10:32of democratic values and the rule of law.

10:35So it's like there's a malpractice of the rule of law first.

10:39And this

10:40takes me, David, to my last topic, which is legal education.

10:45The recent responsibility, which is also an opportunity

10:49among law schools currently because the world needs

What Is The Future of Law Schools?

10:53professionals and needs graduates who are trained in the values of law,

10:58professionals who research on ethics of AI.

11:02Where do you see the opportunity as well as the challenge?

11:06The biggest one probably is the regulation of the access to the legal profession.

11:10Another one is the not always easy path to global

11:15and international legal education, the extremely regulated,

11:20academic content.

11:21But still, I think this is a very important moment

11:24and a moment

11:25where there are big opportunities for law schools to be heard out there.

11:29What is your opinion?

11:31So I tell my students that this is both

11:36the most

11:37terrifying and the most exciting time to become a lawyer.

11:42There was a very set,

11:46well known, longstanding understanding of what

11:50the purpose of law schools were, what we were supposed to be teaching,

11:54what our graduates were expected to do when they graduated.

11:58Almost none of that is true today.

12:01And that is scary because many of the things that we took

12:07for granted about how we were preparing our students has been destabilized.

12:13And much of what we thought was true may no longer be true.

12:17And many things we never thought about before.

12:21But it's also really exciting.

12:23There is much more of an opportunity

12:26to make your own way, to remake

12:30what the fundamental fabric of institutions

12:36we took for granted could never change are now changing before our eyes.

12:40I don't know, take remote work.

12:43You have to be in-person five days a week.

12:45And then suddenly, within an instant, everybody was online.

12:48Now, the challenge for us is that law schools

12:53and the people who run them and teach in them,

12:57have been trained in disciplinary silos, which aren't even just about law but

13:02your particular area in the law, private law, public law, international law.

13:07And the problem is that we are increasingly

13:11being asked to be a part of solving sociology and psychology

13:17and economics and computer science and globalization and many other things.

13:23That's a challenge for us to figure out

13:26how do we reconfigure our institutions

13:29to prepare people to live in this kind of world?

13:34Much of what we used to train them for

13:38is already well done by ChatGPT and other AI, and will be more so.

13:44We can be a part, but only a part of what is going to be

13:50one of the most important transformations, in human history.

13:55Well, let's hope for a

13:56positive future for law schools in the benefit of society,

14:00for a successful establishment of the rule of law worldwide.

14:05And let's hope for legal services providers

14:07to know how to use AI in the benefit of the clients,

14:11in the benefit of efficiency and in the benefit of society.

14:15Thank you very much, David.

14:16It has been a pleasure. Thank you. Thank you.

Recently added transcripts

Browse the whole transcript library

This transcript was generated from the captions YouTube publishes for this video. Get the transcript of any YouTube video atfreeyoutubetranscribe.com, free, unlimited, no sign-up.