Full transcript
Intro
0:03It's time to save the hand for
0:05tomorrow's future. [music]
0:14[music]
0:15It really cannot be overstated how crazy
0:17this is. This is like out of a Hollywood
0:19movie. [music]
0:22Someone typed these questions into chat
0:24GPT. What happens if you take sleeping
0:27pills and alcohol together?
0:30How much would be considered dangerous?
0:37Could it kill someone?
0:50The person who typed those questions
0:52read the answer. Then a few days later
0:55on February 9th, 2026 at 20 to 9 that
0:58evening, a couple checked into a motel
1:01in Suyu Dong in the north of Seoul.
1:05Just under 2 hours later, the woman
1:07walked out alone carrying black plastic
1:10bags.
1:11Shortly afterwards, she got into a white
1:13car. The following evening at around
1:166:00, the man was found dead in that
1:19motel room. The chat GPT conversation
1:23wouldn't become public knowledge until
1:24weeks later. When it finally did, it
1:28made headlines across South Korea.
1:31[music]
The Discovery
1:42Gangbuk, which literally means north of
1:45the river, is a district that sits above
1:47the Han River on the northern side of
1:49Seoul, South Korea. It's an older,
1:52quieter part of the city with narrow
1:54streets, small businesses, and countless
1:57restaurants. And it was here that on
2:00February 10th, 2026,
2:03police entered a local motel after
2:05receiving a report of an unresponsive
2:07man. The staff had gone into the room at
2:09around 6:00 that evening. The guest,
2:12whose identity has never been made
2:14public, had checked in the previous
2:16night, but hadn't checked out or
2:19responded to repeated attempts to
2:20contact him. I'll refer to him as Mr. B.
2:24They found him lying in bed, not
2:26breathing. His body had already become
2:29stiff. Bodily fluids were present, and a
2:32can of beer sat on the bedside table.
2:36There were no signs of a struggle and no
2:38obvious cause of death. And as strange
2:41as the scene was, it wasn't entirely
2:44unfamiliar to investigators.
2:49Just 11 days earlier, on January 29th,
2:52police had responded to another call
2:54from a motel less than a kilometer away.
2:57Another man in his 20s had been found
3:00dead in his motel room in almost
3:02identical circumstances.
3:05South Korean media follows strict victim
3:07anonymization guidelines, so neither
3:10victim's name has been released
3:11publicly. To keep things simple, I'll
3:15refer to the first victim as Mr. A and
3:17the second as Mr. B.
3:20Two young men, both in their 20ies, both
3:23strangers to each other, died within 11
3:26days in the same part of Seoul. And
3:29there was one person connected to both
3:31of them. A young woman in her 20s
3:34captured on CCTV entering both motel
3:37alongside the victims and leaving alone
3:40shortly afterwards. [music]
3:47[music]
Eight Days. Behind
3:54The investigation that would eventually
3:56identify Kim So Young as a suspect did
3:59not begin with the second death.
4:01It actually began with the first.
4:04When Mr. A was found dead on January
4:0729th, police didn't immediately treat
4:09the case as a [music] homicide.
4:11Like I mentioned earlier, there were no
4:13obvious signs of foul [music] play. Even
4:16so, they opened an investigation. What
4:19followed was effectively a race [music]
4:21against time that they would ultimately
4:23lose.
4:25It took investigators 8 days of
4:27reviewing CCTV footage before they
4:29finally
4:29>> [music]
4:30>> identified the young woman who had
4:31entered the motel with Mr. A. Once they
4:34had a face, they ran it through police
4:36records and quickly discovered that Kim
4:38Soong's name was already familiar to
4:41them.
4:51Back in August 2025, an unnamed man had
4:55reported her for theft. Then on December
4:5814th, 2025, just 6 weeks before the
5:02first murder, another complaint was
5:04filed at a police station in Namyangju.
5:08This time it came from Kim's boyfriend
5:10of 1 month. The two had met outside a
5:13cafe where Kim handed him an energy
5:15drink in the car park. A few minutes
5:18after they went inside, he suddenly
5:20collapsed. He was rushed to hospital and
5:23diagnosed with toxic encphylopathy,
5:25a form of brain injury caused by toxic
5:28substances. By the time Mr. A died on
5:31January 29th, that investigation still
5:34hadn't progressed far enough to justify
5:36an arrest. [music] However, with CCTV
5:39now linking Kim to the first motel death
5:42and these reported incidents, police
5:44contacted her on February 2nd and asked
5:47her to come in for questioning. She
5:49agreed. The interview was scheduled for
5:52February 9th, but in the meantime,
5:55investigators received the toxicology
5:57results from Mr. A's postmortem.
6:00Believing they needed more time to
6:01prepare, they postponed the interview
6:04and told Kim she could come in at a
6:06later date. But that delay would have
6:08serious consequences.
6:10While detectives were finalizing the
6:12paperwork, a second man was dying in
6:15another motel room. [music] The second
6:18death, if anything, accelerated the case
6:20decisively.
6:22CCTV from the second motel matched the
6:25first. Same woman, same method, and same
6:29district.
6:31Within hours of discovering Mr. V's
6:33body. Police arrested Kim So Yong
6:35outside her home in Gangbook on February
6:3810th, 2026.
6:40When officers searched her flat, they
6:43found exactly what they'd been looking
6:44for. A large collection of prescription
6:47psychotropic medication,
6:49numerous empty hangover drink bottles
6:52identical to those believed to have been
6:54used during the crimes, and perhaps most
6:57importantly,
6:58her mobile phone.
The Making of a Killer
7:10Born in 2005, Kim So Yong was just 20
7:14years old when she was arrested in
7:15[music] February of 2026.
7:18Soon afterwards, prosecutors took the
7:20unusual step of publicly releasing her
7:23identity. Her name, age, and photograph
7:26were published on the prosecution's
7:28official website, where under Korean
7:31procedure, they remained available for
7:3330 days.
7:35Under Korean law, the public disclosure
7:37of a criminal suspect's identity is
7:40reserved for cases of sufficient
7:41gravity, where the evidence is strong
7:44and the public interest is deemed to
7:46outweigh the suspect's right [music] to
7:48anonymity.
7:49The authorities decided this case met
7:52that threshold.
7:57Long before anyone died, Kim had already
8:00developed a pattern of how to exploit
8:02every system around her. She dropped out
8:05of middle school, was later expelled
8:07from secondary school, and was
8:09eventually evicted from a youth support
8:10facility after repeated thefts.
8:13Acquaintances described her as
8:15attractive and described a pattern of
8:17behavior that was, in retrospect,
8:20distinctly alarming.
8:22She would approach men and get
8:24everything she wanted from them with her
8:25charm and persistence.
8:27Her history of manipulation stretched
8:29back well before the murders.
8:32The very first man who reported her for
8:34theft back in August 2025 experienced
8:38that firsthand.
8:40After he went to police, Kim retaliated
8:43by accusing him of sexual assault. She
8:45claimed he had forced her into a motel
8:47and assaulted her against her will. By
8:50that point, she'd already obtained a
8:52prescription for bzzoazipines after
8:55telling a psychiatrist she was suffering
8:57from PTSD,
8:58and she submitted that prescription as
9:00supporting evidence for her allegation.
9:03The case was eventually dropped for lack
9:05of evidence.
9:07While seeking treatment for what she
9:08claimed was post-traumatic stress, Kim
9:11So Yong visited another psychiatric
9:13clinic and obtained additional
9:15prescriptions for sleeping pills and
9:17tranquilizers.
9:19She took them herself and soon felt her
9:22whole body go limp. She had a
9:24realization.
9:25If the drugs could do that to her, they
9:28could do that to anyone. And a young
9:31woman who could control what a man drank
9:33would be able to overpower him
9:35completely.
9:37The clinics she subsequently visited had
9:39no means to disprove a self-reported
9:41trauma history. Her fabricated
9:44victimhood became a clinical record and
9:46her clinical record became a
9:48prescription.
9:50She then began visiting multiple
9:52clinics, a practice called doctor
9:54shopping. She visited at least five
9:57different psychiatric clinics across
9:58Seoul, presenting different symptoms to
10:01different doctors. Panic disorder here,
10:04insomnia there, depression and
10:06arrhythmia elsewhere. Each doctor
10:09prescribed medication based on the
10:11symptoms they were presented with. Over
10:13time, Kim accumulated large quantities
10:16of prescription drugs, stored them, and
10:19crushed them into a fine powder for
10:20later use. [music] The fact that she
10:23spent months fabricating psychiatric
10:25illnesses purely to obtain drugs capable
10:27of killing someone tells you something
10:29about the level of planning involved.
10:32Then she started testing them.
The Trial Runs
10:40By this point, Kim Soyong had developed
10:43two main ways of finding victims.
10:46The first was through what South Koreans
10:48call a hunting botcher.
10:50These are social venues where single men
10:52and women, typically in their 20s, are
10:55seated separately and encouraged to
10:57approach one another. The exact format
11:00varies from place to place, but the idea
11:02is always the same. strangers, alcohol,
11:07and the expectation that conversations
11:09might turn into dates.
11:11The second was through social media. Kim
11:14was particularly active on platforms
11:16like Instagram, where she would message
11:18men and arrange to meet them and
11:20gradually persuade them to pay for
11:22meals, drinks, and entertainment. And
11:25part of what made her so effective on
11:27Instagram was that she didn't really
11:29look like her Instagram photos.
11:32She had been using May 2, a Chinese AI
11:35photo editing app to smooth her skin,
11:37reshape her face, and layer soft,
11:40flattering filters across her images.
11:43When her real appearance was eventually
11:45made public, many who had seen her
11:47photos online or even exchanged messages
11:50with her were genuinely taken aback.
11:53Well, the photos had done pretty much
11:55what she needed them to do. They got
11:58people's attention, and she took it from
12:00there. She would eventually persuade
12:02some guys online to give her money
12:04directly through charm, manufactured
12:06emotional dependency, and outright
12:08requests.
12:10She was by multiple accounts very good
12:12at it. None of this was new, though.
12:16This is what she had been doing for
12:17years. But at some point during the
12:20autumn of 2025, the dynamic shifted. The
12:24goal was no longer just money. It became
12:27a sort of experimentation. Her first
12:30known drugging attempt took place in
12:32October 2025, which had been a partial
12:35success. While having wine with a man at
12:38a restaurant, she secretly gave him one
12:40of her drug mixtures. He collapsed, but
12:44he recovered sooner than she'd expected.
12:47For Kim, that meant the dosage wasn't
12:49strong enough, so she began adjusting
12:51the formula, varying the types and
12:54quantities of drugs. She also wanted to
12:57know whether alcohol amplified the
12:58effect. To find out, she used her own
13:02boyfriend of 1 month as a controlled
13:04variable who was given the drugs
13:06dissolved in an energy drink, no alcohol
13:08at all, allowing her to compare the
13:11effects directly.
13:13The result of that we already know. Her
13:15boyfriend was hospitalized and remained
13:18unconscious for 2 days before eventually
13:20recovering.
13:22But even that wasn't enough. On January
13:2524th, 2026,
13:27another man collapsed after drinking
13:29with Kim at a karaoke bar. She called an
13:32ambulance herself. According to
13:34emergency dispatch records, she told the
13:37operator, "Some guy got drunk and won't
13:40wake up when I try to wake him. He can't
13:42handle alcohol."
13:44He also survived.
13:46There was another incident earlier in
13:48January where another man at a motel in
13:50Jong Nugu was found unconscious but
13:53survived. Another data point in a
13:56pattern that was escalating steadily
13:58deliberately.
14:08After four test runs, one lesson stood
14:10out. In public venues like restaurants,
14:13cafes, [music] karaoke bars, witnesses
14:16could intervene.
14:18People would stop her leaving and she
14:20couldn't control what happened next. If
14:23she wanted to complete what she had
14:24started without interruption, she needed
14:27to be somewhere private. From then on,
14:30she only chose motel.
The Search History
14:38When Kim Soong was arrested, police
14:40seized her mobile phone. What
14:43investigators found on that device was
14:44something that had to [music] this point
14:47never been introduced as murder evidence
14:48in a South Korean courtroom. A
14:51conversation with Chat GPT.
14:55According to South Korean police, Chat
14:57GPT played a direct role in the murders.
15:01I won't spend too much time covering the
15:03first murder because in many ways it
15:05closely mirrors what happened to the
15:07second victim and we simply have far
15:09more information about that case. There
15:12is however one detail that's worth
15:15mentioning.
15:16After leaving the motel while Mr. A lay
15:18unconscious inside, Kim sent him a
15:21message that read, "You're too drunk.
15:24Keep falling asleep."
15:26As though nothing had happened, she then
15:28left South Korea on a short trip to
15:30Japan just a few days later. She was now
15:33outside the country beyond the immediate
15:36reach of investigators.
15:38According to Korean news reports, she
15:41showed no signs of distress whatsoever.
15:44In fact, while she was in Japan, she was
15:46already messaging another man about what
15:48they should eat together. That man would
15:52become her next victim.
15:54On the evening of the second murder,
15:56February 9th, Kim messaged her date.
16:00Well, her victim, Mr. B. Hey, remember
16:04you said we'd eat meat next time. I know
16:07a good place, but it happens to be
16:09delivery only food. So, should we drink
16:12in the room? Or if that feels awkward,
16:15we could drink somewhere else and eat
16:17there, too. We drink at a bar first
16:19round. Then, for round two, wouldn't it
16:22be better to have drinks in the room?
16:24I know a good meat place, so we buy
16:27alcohol at a convenience store and eat
16:29there rather than heading in right away.
16:33Kim had everything planned out. At
16:36around 20 to 8 in the evening, CCTV
16:39captured her inside a small convenience
16:41store alongside Mr. B. He watched her
16:44get 35,0001 worth of drinks, roughly $18
16:48or $24. and he ended up footing the
16:51entire bill after she claimed she didn't
16:54have enough money. At 9:23 that evening
16:58inside the motel room, Mr. B drank from
17:01the drugged bottle and gradually lost
17:03consciousness.
17:04Once he was no longer responsive, Kim
17:07used his debit card to order 22 items of
17:10food costing around 130,0001,
17:14roughly £72 or $90.
17:17The delivery driver arrived at around
17:1910:11 that night. According to
17:21investigating [music] authorities, the
17:23driver noted she opened the door just
17:25enough to stick her hand out. A few
17:28minutes later, at around 10:19, she
17:31left. She took the drugged bottle with
17:34her, left behind an empty can of beer
17:37and a clean hangover drink.
17:41[music]
17:45She sent a photo of the inside of the
17:47taxi. Then a message. I'm in a taxi
17:52heading home. I really did want to stay
17:54and share the room with you, but I got
17:57my period, so I had to go. I didn't even
18:00have pads on me. Thank you for the cash
18:03for the taxi and for buying me all that
18:05lovely food. I'm a little sad you fell
18:08asleep on me. Then came a longer
18:11message.
18:12When I said my stomach had suddenly gone
18:14and I needed to get home, you gave me
18:16the cash for the taxi. There was
18:19something tucked in with it. I'll give
18:21that back next time. Anyway, thank you
18:24for worrying about me getting home safe.
18:27You ordered fried chicken on my phone.
18:29We watched a film together. You were
18:31even moved to tears. And then you just
18:34fell asleep. When the food was about to
18:37arrive, I tried to wake you and you
18:39handed me your card to pay.
18:41I told you not to sleep, but you were so
18:44tired. I asked what to do with the food,
18:47and you said just eat it or take it
18:49home. So, I took it with me since eating
18:53alone there felt too lonely.
18:56Next time, let's go for Korean beef.
18:59Every message [music] was creating an
19:00alibi. The food was his idea. The card
19:04was his choice. Going home was his
19:06suggestion.
19:08She was composing in real time a version
19:11of events that would explain away every
19:13[music] piece of evidence.
The Reasons Why
19:27The trial began on April 9th, 2026 at
19:31the 14th criminal division of Soul
19:33Northern District Court. Prosecutors
19:36presented toxicology reports showing
19:38that the amount of medication found in
19:40both victims bodies exceeded what
19:42experts described as the lethal
19:44threshold.
19:45They presented the chat GPT logs as well
19:48as the CCTV [music] footage. Now, there
19:51is however one important detail that's
19:54worth mentioning here as well. By the
19:56time the trial began, almost every
19:59report covering the case, from South
20:01Korean newspapers to major international
20:03outlets, [music] had paraphrased Kim's
20:05conversation with Chat GPT in roughly
20:08the same way. Many reports gave the
20:11impression that Kim had specifically
20:13asked about mixing sleeping pills with
20:15alcohol from the very beginning, but
20:17that isn't what she actually [music]
20:19typed. Her first question was simply,
20:23"What happens if you overdose on
20:24sleeping pills?"
20:26Then, "Will a person die if they take a
20:29lot of sleeping pills?"
20:32It was chat GPT that introduced alcohol
20:34into the conversation.
20:36While answering a question about
20:38sleeping pill overdoses, the model
20:40explained that combining certain
20:42medications with alcohol significantly
20:44increased the risk of respiratory
20:46failure.
20:47Open AAI, the company behind ChatGpt,
20:51later issued a statement explaining that
20:53Kim's questions were factual in nature
20:56and therefore did not trigger any of the
20:58platform safety filters. The AI hadn't
21:01told her how to poison someone. It
21:04hadn't given her a method or a recipe.
21:06She already had the method. She
21:09basically wanted to find out whether it
21:11could be fatal.
21:13For investigators though, the more
21:15important question wasn't whether chat
21:17GPT had influenced the murders. It was
21:20whether those conversations demonstrated
21:22that Kim herself [music] understood the
21:24consequences of what she was doing.
21:27Prosecutors believed they did. Alongside
21:30the criminal proceedings, Kim also
21:32underwent extensive psychological and
21:34cognitive assessments.
21:36One of those assessments involved the
21:38hair psychopathy checklist revised,
21:40[music] better known as the PCLR,
21:44the most widely used diagnostic tool to
21:46measure psychopathic [music] traits. Kim
21:49scored 25 out of 40. In South Korea, a
21:54score of around 25 is generally
21:56considered the threshold for a clinical
21:57designation of psychopathy.
22:00She sat precisely on that line. To put
22:03that into perspective, it is the fifth
22:05highest psychopathy score ever recorded
22:07in a South Korean criminal case, placing
22:10her alongside names such as Yu Yong Ch,
22:14a serial killer responsible [music] for
22:1520 deaths, and Jong Yu Jong, who gained
22:19international notoriety for the 2023
22:22murder of her tutor.
22:25But the psychopathy score was only part
22:27of the picture [music]
22:28because there had always been another
22:30question.
22:31How did someone methodical enough to
22:33conduct months of drug trials simply
22:36fail to account for the CCTV cameras?
22:39How did she not see the trail she was
22:41leaving? Why leave behind text messages?
22:45Why continue using the same approach
22:47after her own boyfriend had already
22:49reported her to the police?
22:51The IQ assessment provided the answer.
22:55Kim so young has an IQ of between 70 and
22:5880, placing her in what psychologists
23:00call the borderline range, the bottom
23:0310% of the population.
23:05Criminal psychologist Professor Lee Su
23:08Jang of Kyongi University stated that an
23:11IQ in this range makes meticulous
23:13sequential planning cognitively
23:15difficult.
23:16And combined with her psychopathic
23:18profile, the criminal psychologists
23:20arrived at an unusual combination.
23:24someone capable of extraordinary
23:25emotional detachment, but without the
23:28cognitive ability to fully think several
23:30steps ahead. Her defense pointed to her
23:33childhood. Her father was violent and
23:36struggled with alcoholism, regularly
23:38beating her mother before eventually
23:40abandoning the family while Kim was
23:42still in primary school. They also
23:45pointed to her cognitive diagnosis,
23:47arguing that the instability she
23:49experienced during those early years may
23:52have affected her neurological
23:53development during a critical period of
23:55childhood.
23:57According to the defense, the
23:58deprivation she experienced [music]
24:00growing up, both physical and emotional,
24:03had eventually hardened into something
24:05she could no longer control. But the
24:08victim's families weren't persuaded. 94
24:11petitions from the victim's families
24:13demanding the death penalty was
24:15submitted to the court. She and her
24:18parents are being sued for 1.1 billion1
24:21by the victim's families around $600,000
24:25or $810,000.
24:28Kim stated that she can't repay this
24:30even if she works her whole life. She
24:33also argued that her parents should not
24:35be held liable and asked the families to
24:37reduce the amount. As of July 15th,
24:402026, according to a report by YTN, she
24:45continues to deny any intention to kill
24:47either victims.
24:49Her defense is that she administered
24:50drugs to the men to prevent them from
24:52sexually assaulting her. She basically
24:54wanted to prevent unwanted sexual
24:56contact. Later, that argument became
24:59even more specific.
25:01Rather than presenting it as a general
25:03precaution, Kim alleged that particular
25:06victims had previously forced her into
25:08unwanted sexual acts and that drugging
25:10those men was a targeted response to
25:12those specific incidents.
25:15Prosecutors rejected that explanation
25:17entirely.
25:18Messages showed Kim suggesting they go
25:20to motel.
25:22CCTV also captured her willingly holding
25:25the men's hands on the way there and
25:27behaving affectionately throughout their
25:28dates. In court, prosecutors presented
25:32additional footage showing her smiling
25:34and appearing visibly excited. Taken
25:37together, it painted a very different
25:39picture from the one she was presenting
25:41in her defense, and the court did not
25:43treat her as a victim.
25:46In March 2026, a five-page handwritten
25:50letter from Kim Soyong written from Soul
25:52Detention Center was made public.
25:55Someone had written to her asking about
25:57the case and she'd written back. I have
26:00access to four of those five pages.
26:02[music]
26:03I'm not going to go through it line by
26:05line, but a few things stood out. In her
26:08own [music] words, she wrote, "I can't
26:11sleep. I cry every day. I'm exhausted."
26:17and elsewhere in the letter. Being
26:19separated from my family, my heart
26:22crumbles and tears apart a little more
26:24each day. She wrote that she was afraid
26:27she'd never leave and die in prison. To
26:31the victims and their families, she
26:32wrote, [music]
26:34"I'm sorry.
26:36I know I can't be forgiven. I will spend
26:39my life in reflection."
26:41while in the same letter claiming she'd
26:43given the drugs out of fear after
26:45memories of being sexually assaulted
26:47came back to her. She also complained
26:50that there was too much media coverage
26:52and that having her identity disclosed
26:54meant everyone recognized her. The
26:57letter ended with a call for better
26:59psychological treatment of suspects and
27:01for their side of the story to be
27:03properly heard.
27:07Korean online communities erupted in
27:09debate. Was the identity disclosure
27:12appropriate? Did Kim Soyong's youth make
27:15the publication of her photograph a
27:17violation of her rights?
27:19The consequences of the case's notoriety
27:22spread further than the online debate.
27:25In early March 2026, a Korean broadcast
27:28network's investigative program,
27:30Unanswered Questions, displayed Kim's
27:33drug names on screen. Within hours,
27:36users had reconstructed and circulated
27:38what they were calling [music] a recipe.
27:41On X, it reached 2 million views and
27:4424,000 likes. [music]
27:47A professor of criminal psychology
27:49appeared on television to warn that this
27:51kind [music] of viral dissemination had
27:53lowered the barrier to copycat crime.
27:56The warning would prove legitimate. In
27:59May 2026, a taekwondo gym director was
28:03arrested for attempting murder using the
28:05same class of drugs.
28:08Kim herself addressed the disclosure
28:10directly. In the same handwritten
28:12submission to the civil court, where she
28:14pleaded poverty over the damages claim,
28:17she also wrote about the prosecutor's
28:19decision to publish her name and face.
28:22It had destroyed her life. She said she
28:25could not even dream now.
28:31I'll leave it here for today. If this
28:34video was worth your time, a like and a
28:36subscribe go a long way. Keep vigilant
28:40and as always, thanks for watching.