Triple Captain Palmer!? 🥶 | BigManBakar's Gameweek 4 Team Reveal! | Fantasy Premier League 2026/27

0:00Welcome to the Fantasy Football Hub

0:01YouTube channel. Today I'm joined by the

0:03big man BAR to preview gameweek 4 where

0:06BAR might be playing another chip. Back

0:09to back chips. BAR triple captain. Is

0:12that an option this week?

0:15Hello Jack. Hello. Welcome to all the

0:16listeners and viewers. Uh yeah, I mean

0:18it's it's under consideration for sure.

0:20I'm currently on this fence uh as to

0:22whether or not I play it. Uh I've not

0:24had enough time to think about FPL

0:26actually, which is good after a very

0:27tough week. It's it's been a bit of a

0:29non-event game three uh in terms of uh

0:31you know for most wild carders and not

0:33not anyone popular scored many points. I

0:36guess the main players I was missing

0:38from mine were were the city ones and

0:40I'm actually glad that I didn't go there

0:41because at this point in time apart from

0:42Harlem none of them looked like being

0:44realistic options for the for the long

0:46term. Uh the minutes are are just too uh

0:49let's say dodgy or shaky to predict. So

0:52I ended up on I think 36 points which

0:54was okay. Overall, I I feel still quite

0:56content with where I'm at with my rank

0:58uh with my wild card team. It was built

1:00with the idea of making a robust team

1:02which was going to enable me to save as

1:05many transfers as possible for a while.

1:07And I think that purpose can be achieved

1:09quite comfortably for the next 2 to 3

1:11weeks and I can just be on on autopilot.

1:14It'll give me six or seven and then I

1:16can just decide where to use my

1:18transfers at that point. But for now, I

1:20I think uh you know, some bad varian

1:22said they scored an own goal. I was

1:24quite mad when that happened. But uh I

1:27mean it is what it is. We go with the

1:30with the flow and trust the process.

1:32>> Yeah, it happens, doesn't it? Um I had

1:34quite a few comments on our last video

1:35where people were saying, "I've never

1:36seen Jack as as strong as this or as

1:39like uh not aggressive, but you know, I

1:42was quite ant I was I was trying to I

1:45well, I don't know how to describe it. I

1:46was anti- wild card last week. Do you

1:49think I've been vindicated by this score

1:51or

1:53does it not really matter one game week

1:55being completely honest? And final

1:57question, if you could have saved the

1:59wild card last week, like being

2:01completely objective and honest, do you

2:03do you back the decision-m process

2:05there? Do you back the decision is what

2:06I should say?

2:10>> Yes. I mean, you look at my team and

2:12compare it to the non- wildcard team. I

2:14mean, Enzola scored a penalty which no

2:16one would have predicted. I mean the

2:18main risk was the United guys going big

2:20and I guess and Bulma scored but

2:21Fernandez did nothing, Muire did

2:22nothing. Uh I mean it was it was the

2:25sort of team where yes my initial non-

2:27wildard team probably outscored my

2:29current team but it was it was not an

2:31outcome to be expected. So I don't

2:33regret the wild card decision at all

2:34really because I I think for my team it

2:36made a lot of sense and uh I guess some

2:39of the free hitters did well but even

2:40even with the exception of Isac none of

2:42them really did do much because for

2:45blanked, Cherokee blank, the Brenford

2:46defense blanked so there were not too

2:48many high scores across the horizon. It

2:50was just that sort of a week which was a

2:52non-event for pretty much everyone

2:53across the board. So I I don't want to

2:56assess my decision uh in one week and

2:58and like generally I don't look at

3:01outcome as a way of mating the success

3:04or failure of my decision. I just think

3:06that at that point in time before the

3:08deadline it made too much sense for me

3:10not to go there. I think the debate for

3:13me in hindsight, if you insist, for me

3:16to sort of go back and reconsider, maybe

3:19I could have gone with a different draft

3:21where I had Gabrielle over over Saka,

3:23but even even then, I mean, there was

3:26not much difference in terms of that in

3:27this. So, um, yeah, I mean, overall, I'm

3:30happy to have a robust draft ac across

3:32the horizon, and I'm glad to have

3:33avoided City. I'm glad not to have poked

3:36in a transfer to bring any of uh the new

3:39guys in. And I think as far as um I'm

3:42concerned, I have a very boring robotic

3:45and um I I I would say borderline

3:50um I mean robotic I think is the right

3:53word. Robotic way of playing. And uh I I

3:56can I I already know a lot of people in

3:58the comments will be like why did you

3:59pick double Newcastle defense? Why Saka?

4:01And I did change from a Cali and um

4:05Elliot Anderson draft in the previous

4:07video to this one. Yeah, I was going to

4:09say I didn't realize you didn't end up

4:10with Cal Fury. That's quite bold.

4:13>> Yeah, I mean the reason being that I did

4:14not want um O'Reilly. So before the

4:17deadline, I I made my mind up. I spoke

4:19to a few City fans that I trust and they

4:21were of the opinion that O'Reilly may or

4:23may not play. And yes, he he ended up

4:25starting got uh injured in in the

4:28warm-up, but I think I can say this with

4:30full confidence that there's no sort of

4:31guarantee that he plays in the coming

4:33weeks. So if if I was not able to use

4:37the California cash to get O'Reilly, I

4:39thought I might as well go with either a

4:41Sak or Gabriel draft. And that's where I

4:42was before the deadline. So I kept

4:44swapping back and forth between the two.

4:46And then I just ended up on the Saka

4:48draft because I thought that um I can

4:51potentially cover the Arsenal defense

4:52with Ryan Cona and maybe then later go

4:55to Celiba if needed. So I did not invest

4:56the cash in Gabriel and I thought that

4:58Saka would be a nice way of parking the

5:00cash and he would enable me to get Bruno

5:01Fernandez comfortably later if need be

5:03as well. So that's where I ended up and

5:06no regrets honestly in respect to

5:07whatever outcome I face uh in the coming

5:10weeks.

5:10>> Yeah, fair enough. I will say I'm I'm

5:1290% going to wild card this week. Uh and

5:15my team doesn't look too dissimilar to

5:17yours at all. It's like there's probably

5:19like five or six differences I would

5:22say. Maybe more, but like the key

5:23players are the same. Like I think I'll

5:25have Saka Palmer obviously Harland

5:28obviously well not obviously but J Pedro

5:31is in there as well. Apart from that

5:32it's it's not too dissimilar. Sort of

5:34the fringe players are are the different

5:36ones. So in terms of the outcome of one

5:39week I didn't go your way but I think

5:42that happens doesn't it? Anyway let's um

5:44let's [clears throat]

5:44>> Where did it end up with your team? How

5:45how many points did you get last week? I

5:47assume it was

5:48>> I got 56. So you saying it's a non-event

5:50when I've gained 20 points on you? I'd

5:52have to disagree with that because, you

5:53know, 20 points on on any given week is

5:55is quite a lot of points.

5:56>> Oh, wow. That's a lot. I thought I

5:58thought it would be plus 10 or

5:59something. I did not realize it would be

6:00that much.

6:01>> I did triple the main difference. So,

6:02that there was there's

6:05>> Yeah. I mean, that that sort of explains

6:07uh my thinking really. If you take that

6:09nine extra points out of the equation,

6:11it's plus 10 essentially.

6:12>> Yeah. And if I if I if you didn't wild

6:14card, then you'd have a wild card chip,

6:17>> you know.

6:17>> Well, true. But I don't think that if I

6:19was wild carding this week, I would I

6:21would field a very dissimilar team to my

6:23team as as you said. So,

6:24>> no, that's true.

6:25>> I mean, I I have a couple of free

6:26transfers on you as well. So, I I could

6:28argue differently,

6:29>> but um I mean, I also have the triple G

6:32on you, which I'm considering using this

6:34week, so let's come to that.

6:36>> Let's talk about that. How how have you

6:37come how have you come to that in your

6:39mind? So, I've seen that a little bit on

6:40Twitter. I quite like it. I do quite

6:42like it. Assuming this is going to be on

6:44on Palmer, right?

6:48Yes, I mean I'm going to be captaining

6:49Palmer for sure because he's on pens and

6:51the fixture against Hal City is fine. I

6:53mean yes, Hal City have not conceded a

6:55goal so far but when you look at the

6:57underlying metrics they're not that

6:59amazing and it suggests extreme level of

7:01overperformance. So I'm expecting things

7:03to revert to the mean very soon starting

7:05this week probably with with Chelsea.

7:08I'm going to monitor Palmer's minutes

7:10tonight. I mean Chelsea are playing

7:11leads United uh in the EFL Cup. So if

7:13Palmer does not get too many minutes, I

7:16think there's it's a decent chance that

7:18I go with Palmer trip to capacity. Now I

7:20have to weigh this up with some of the

7:21other weeks as well. And that's an

7:23interesting debate because currently I'm

7:24on the fence. I'm not really sure which

7:26way I'm going because you have to look

7:28at Holland in game week 7 against

7:29Ipsswish at home or game week 16 at Hull

7:31at home as being the realistic windows.

7:34Um, look, triple cabinet is a chip which

7:38I mean we've discussed this at length

7:40over the previous seasons as well and I

7:42don't sort of give it too much

7:44importance in terms of the weight it

7:46carries. I think if you can get let's

7:47say anywhere between seven to 10 points

7:49out of it that's that's fine. Um,

7:53because essentially you're just gaining

7:54a player over the field because you're

7:56going to captain him anyway. I'm looking

7:58at uh gameweek four or seven more

8:00realistically because by gameweek 16 I'm

8:02not going to be sure whether I own

8:03Harland at that point. I might want to

8:05let's say u move back to Bruno Fernandez

8:09in gameweek 8 in which case I might look

8:10at selling Harland. So I don't want the

8:14triple capy to be a factor at that point

8:16when I'm making that decision on whether

8:18or not to swap from Holland to

8:20Fernandez. So taking AMX16 out of the

8:22equation, I'm looking at four and seven

8:24as more realistic windows and I think

8:26there's nothing much between the split

8:28the two of them. The thing with seven is

8:30that Holland has if at home

8:33>> but it's it's sort of either side of two

8:35games um in in Europe. One I think is

8:38against PSG, the other is against

8:39Athens. I would expect a rest against

8:41Athens probably, but but you never know.

8:43And Mesa's comments regarding managing

8:46Holland's minutes u I'm not so sure. I

8:49mean, I'm I'm fully sure he's going to

8:50start in the Premier League, but I mean,

8:52any early sub um is going to be a

8:55massive um sort of spanner in the works

8:57when it comes to the triple captaincy.

8:59So, I mean, there's a chance to take

9:02some some potential points um for Palmer

9:05at home to Hull. That's the positive,

9:07but I'm always wary of going against

9:09Holland. That's why I'm 50/50 on a

9:11decision. Let's say if you flip things

9:13around if Holland had Hall at home this

9:15week and Palmer was the game week seven

9:17choice at home too if I'm almost certain

9:19I would have captain Holland this week

9:21but

9:22>> that's the thing with Holland you just

9:23get that sort of comfort blanket with

9:25him and I assume this is exactly why you

9:27played the chip last week as well.

9:29>> Yeah I I um I want to ask you if any

9:33part of you is thinking because Palmer

9:36is not going to be anywhere near as

9:37captained as Harland was. I don't I

9:39don't know what Harland's effective

9:40ownership was. I think it was like 220%

9:42or something. It was above 200 last

9:44week.

9:45>> Does that does that entice you a little

9:46bit?

9:46>> 35 I think.

9:48>> Was it 235? Okay. Well, so just to

9:50explain what that means, um he was owned

9:52by effectively 235%

9:55of people. If you captain him, he's

9:57200%. So that means that there were more

9:59people that had triple captain. Like if

10:02if even if you'd captained him, you

10:04didn't necessarily want him to do well

10:06because there were so many triple caps

10:08on him. for example, people like me. Um,

10:10relative points obviously are very

10:12important. Does part of you think

10:14because Palmer is not going to be I mean

10:15I don't know what Palmer's effective

10:16ownership is going to be, it won't be

10:18more than 200. His ownership right now

10:20is 22%. It might not be above 100 to be

10:23fair. It might not be above 100. I think

10:26he he'll be brought in by quite a lot of

10:27people, but because of his price, it's

10:29not a guarantee. Also, blanking last

10:31game doesn't doesn't help. And Hull have

10:33been decent in terms of well goals

10:35conceded obviously. Does that does that

10:37entice you a little bit more knowing

10:39that say he's at like 60% EO and you

10:42have him at 300 you have 300% of his

10:44points that could be a crazy hall if it

10:48comes in.

10:50>> Yes, of course. And I think a lot of

10:52people will resort to Holland against

10:53Man United because you know Man United's

10:56defense isn't all that great. A lot of

10:57people go Ja Pedro instead because J

10:59Pedro has looked quite good this season

11:00as well.

11:01>> So there are alternatives credible

11:02alternatives available to Palmer which

11:04is why some people will go differently.

11:06So yeah, I mean that does tempt me for

11:08sure. I mean if I'm getting a [snorts]

11:10potential differential triple gap and

11:12that's that's not bad. But as I say,

11:14it's just the Holland factor

11:16which is making me reconsider because

11:18Holland can just get a random hat-tick

11:20in any fixture at home to Har at home to

11:23you know Ipsswitch for example. Um

11:26>> he scored two away at Porto last night.

11:30But at the same time uh I also get the

11:33feeling and it has been the case in

11:35recent years as well where I always feel

11:37slightly more let's say comfy uh having

11:40a um having a midfield midfielder as a

11:44as a triple captain because I just think

11:45have more ways of points essentially

11:47you're looking at two goals from Holland

11:49to to get to 30 13 points whereas with

11:52with Palmer even with one goal he can

11:54reach 12 or 13 fairly easily. all he

11:57needs is like a clean sheet and three

11:59bonus and he can get there. So that's

12:02one thing that that's there at the back

12:04of my mind where I just think that the

12:06ceiling for a midfielder is generally

12:08higher compared to a forward. But it's

12:13just that it's Holland. That's the only

12:15factor that's stopping me from actually

12:17activating the chip right now because I

12:19haven't activated it yet. I think it's

12:21it's tough with when you have someone

12:23like Harland because you you know that

12:25he is likely to score in like I switch

12:29at home he is likely to score. Palmer is

12:32Palmer likely to score at home? You'd

12:34say yes, but in terms of the actual

12:36stats and if you were to play that game

12:39a 100 times, Harland would score in more

12:43games than than Palmer would. So you're

12:46you're rolling the dice a little bit

12:47there. But I do agree with you. I think

12:50Harland's potential scores are more um

12:55concentrated than Palmer's. I think I

12:57feel like Harland's flaw is higher for

13:00like Coventry at home. Yeah, that he's

13:02not always going to score in that game,

13:03but you would bet quite a decent amount

13:06that he would he was he's more likely to

13:08score in that game than any other player

13:09in the league. Palmer could easily not

13:11score against Hull. I think that's I

13:13think that's very feasible. Um, but he

13:15also could do really well and as you

13:17said, if he scores a couple of goals,

13:19you know, that's or gets an assist or

13:21something. Harland is struggling to get

13:23out to those numbers. So, could be

13:25unbelievable. I I kind of back it. If it

13:27was me, I I I

13:30just feel like I know the the expected

13:33numbers against Hull are not good from a

13:36whole perspective, but I do feel like

13:38they are just in in bit form right now.

13:42uh playing well. Obviously, everyone is

13:44is behind the manager who's had a really

13:46good start. Managers just signed a new

13:48contract.

13:49I feel like there might be better

13:50opportunities and and as you said,

13:54Harland is is scary not to triple

13:55captain Harland in a single game week,

13:58but what would you say? How likely are

14:00you to do it right now?

14:02>> I'm generally 50/50 as of now. The thing

14:05is with Palmer, I'm going to benefit

14:06anyway if he if he holds and he's my

14:09right.

14:10>> You might as well extra benefit.

14:13See that's the thing and it comes to

14:14being uh it comes to risk appetite

14:16actually at the end of the day if you're

14:17prepared to let's say swallow or stomach

14:19a Harlem 17 pointer against the switch

14:21when like you mentioned Palmer could

14:23realistically blank against all I mean

14:25that's so you lose 15

14:27>> yeah I mean that's the risk reward that

14:29you have to weigh up and that's the

14:30worst worst worst case scenario we're

14:32talking about that's like you know a

14:34Palmer blanks and Holland goes mental

14:36that's what we're sort of considering

14:39[sighs]

14:39I will assess closer to the deadline

14:41Man, I mean unfortunately if anyone

14:43wants a final answer, I don't have it

14:44right now because um it is just that

14:47sort of a decision which can go either

14:49way.

14:50>> Well, you have to sign up to Fantasy

14:51Football Hub to see BAR's final team.

14:54Link is down below. Um but it's still,

14:57by the way, 50% off still even this far

14:58into the season. We've only had three

15:00game weeks. There's still 35 left. If

15:02you haven't yet signed up to Fantasy

15:03Football Hub, you need to do that. What

15:06I'm going to show now is because

15:07recommended transfers. Now, this is

15:10something else that you get if you sign

15:11up to Fantasy Football Hub. Completely

15:13personalized to your team. You have two

15:16free transfers per car. AI is

15:19recommending you make none, which is

15:20exactly what you want to see given that

15:22you've just wild carded. And you said

15:23already that you don't want to make any

15:25transfers. So, there you go. You got to

15:28be happy with that.

15:28>> Exactly. I mean, I want to roll I want

15:30to roll till eternity. And that's that's

15:32my point. I mean, you can

15:35>> I know that's I know that is your

15:36strategy. You did very well last year.

15:38Where'd you come last year again? 800

15:39and something

15:41>> 837

15:43I think.

15:45>> So yeah, I mean that's that's exactly

15:46what I'm

15:46>> You're like the

15:50>> Yeah, exactly. I mean I'm going to jam

15:52some one nil wins in some of the

15:54difficult games game weeks of the season

15:57and hopefully get get a bit of luck on

15:59the way and and you know just play

16:02solidly throughout.

16:05>> Yeah. I mean, but also it will require a

16:07bit of luck and that's something that

16:09did not fall my way in the previous game

16:11week. But anyway, I mean coming to the

16:12team, if you look at pick team, uh I I

16:15think the team picks itself this week.

16:16I'm very glad that Concorded

16:19the previous game, he's going to be a

16:20genuine option for me. I can't bench the

16:22Kyper against Coventry and obviously Van

16:24Heeka is looking like a decent uh pick

16:26at home to Everton. Everton's attack, I

16:29think, is is not going to be as as good

16:31in the absence of um Enjoy and Spurs are

16:34looking okay. Okay. I mean, um, they got

16:36a decent result of way to Nottingham

16:38Forest. So, I'm going to go with the 343

16:41formation. Singar is the only one out of

16:43my front eight that I am generally

16:45concerned about. And I'm not sure

16:46whether his early substitution was down

16:48in the fact that he was on on a yellow

16:49card or whether it was just really bad

16:51because he did not really have a good

16:53game. So, he's going to be on the bench

16:55and obviously I can bench double

16:56Newcastle away to leads as well because

16:58I would expect leads to score. Leads are

17:00quite good. So 343 with with Palmer

17:03captain, no transfers, and then come

17:05back to, you know, things in gameweek

17:08five. But I might as well record my team

17:12video for game week five as well because

17:13we're going to have be having a very

17:14similar conversation.

17:15>> Okay, let's do it now.

17:17>> Now, Jake,

17:19>> I will say like the the reaction to

17:20Sangar has been so interesting. Like the

17:22overreaction to him playing well was

17:24yeah, he had a couple good games. He got

17:27the assists were were impressive, but

17:29like all the defensive stuff, we knew he

17:30was going to do that. He's a he's a

17:32beast at that. The then the overreaction

17:35to him being subbed on a yellow card,

17:37like it happens. It happened to Solace.

17:40He then played really well against

17:42Chelsea. Sangari is going to be in the

17:43team. I wouldn't worry about that. Maybe

17:45he's not going to be a 90-minute man and

17:47that that is an issue for someone that

17:49we have for defcons, but he's shown

17:50that. I mean, his defcon per 90 is

17:52ridiculous and I think it will continue

17:54to be. He's still very much in in

17:56consideration for me on my wild card. I

17:58think he's he's going to be a great FPL

18:00asset. Um I do want to ask you what

18:02would what would the differences be if

18:03you were wild carding this week? What

18:05would the diff what differences would

18:07you have compared to last week? It's a

18:09big thing we talked about.

18:12>> Yeah, I mean that's a good question. Uh

18:14I think I would probably go with less

18:16reliance on Newcastle for for once.

18:18Maybe uh maybe pick one defender over

18:21two potentially. I would probably go

18:23with Muhamer as well from leads. I quite

18:25like the look of him.

18:27>> Apart from that, you have to go with the

18:28Harlem team in my opinion. Um

18:31>> and and I think you could probably go

18:33Rogers over uh over Saka and maybe go

18:37with um a triple Arsenal defense

18:39instead.

18:40>> I think that's something I would

18:41consider because one one of the reason

18:44why I picked Saka over Turkey was the

18:46fact that I not wanted to book in an

18:48additional transfer. But let's say if I

18:49was using a chip this week, I would

18:50probably go with Rogers and use the cash

18:52to get an Arsenal defender. I think

18:54that's quite workable.

18:56>> But I don't think I would change much

18:59apart from that. I think the Kyper and

19:00Gross are excellent enablers. I think

19:03so. Bosage or Pedro need to be there.

19:05Holland of course. Zangari I think is

19:07still fine as a as an eighth attacker. I

19:09don't think there's anything wrong with

19:10that. Apart from that, Ryan Con have to

19:13be there. So essentially I'd still be

19:15picking like 11 or 12 of the ones that I

19:17have.

19:18Yeah, I I will say so my differences

19:20that I have on my current wild card and

19:22I'll do a video talking about mine is I

19:24have uh Rogers instead of Sangari

19:28and Barry instead of Whissa. That's the

19:30only differences in the front eight and

19:33then I have um Verbugen instead of Rya,

19:37Califuriori instead of Malikchow and

19:40then Hall and Vaneka are the ones that

19:42I'm considering with like Vuskovic,

19:43Maharmmovic uh also Hall also Vaneka.

19:46So, it's not too dissimilar at all to be

19:48fair and you made quite a lot of money.

19:50>> There we go. Anything else you want to

19:51touch on this week? Anything any any key

19:54players this week? Like Rogers, for

19:55example, is I mean, what do you think?

19:58Do you think we need to triple up on

19:59Chelsea this week if we can? How key is

20:01Palmer? Obviously, you've talked about

20:02triple captain. A lot of people are

20:04probably thinking, well, I've got Jar

20:05Pedra already. I'm going to captain him.

20:08Do I need Palmer? Do I need Rogers? What

20:09do you think to that? Final question.

20:12>> Yeah, I think that's a good question. I

20:13think if anyone has a city mid I think

20:15Turkey or for Rogers is an excellent

20:17answer to me. I think it's something

20:18that

20:19>> yes I think it's something that I would

20:21definitely do after the EFL Cup game if

20:23not done already and I don't think my

20:26decision would um would necessarily

20:30involve thinking or overthinking too

20:32much about the triple up because I try

20:33try and look at things in isolation. I I

20:36mean I have no problems hesitating on

20:39tripling up on a defense for example the

20:40Arsenal fans had so early in the season.

20:42So I think you should look at the same

20:43way for the attack as well. And I think

20:45Rogers at 7.5 or 7.6 is actually quite a

20:48good pick because he's not u he's not

20:51risky for minutes. He's going to play

20:53every game. There's no European threat.

20:55There's no Champions League etc. So he's

20:57just fine at that price. I don't think

20:59there's anything wrong with it. And I

21:00think you need to look at your decision

21:02to captain or triple captain Palmer in

21:04isolation as well. Just because you have

21:05triple Chelsea tag does not mean that

21:07you should not captain or triple captain

21:09Palmer. I think this is a very common

21:11mistake that a lot of people make

21:12>> uh and they sort of don't want to sort

21:15of believe in coariance or don't want to

21:18put too many eggs in one basket. I think

21:19it's you should look at each decision on

21:23merit and if in isolation it makes sense

21:26it's fine. For example, you should be

21:27comparing the Palmer triple captaincy to

21:29the Harland triple captaincy in seven.

21:31It has nothing to do with whether or not

21:32you have triple Chelsea attack in your

21:34team. That's the way at least I would

21:35look at it.

21:37But yeah, I mean those are my thoughts.

21:39I think triple up is is absolutely fine.

21:42>> If I was to ask you now, triple captain

21:44or not, what would you say? Yes or no?

21:49>> Uh

21:51I think if if Palmer gets a rest

21:52tonight, I think I will be there.

21:54>> Okay.

21:56Rest is in comes off he's definitely

21:58going to start.

22:00I mean if he comes off at the hour mark

22:02that I would still count that as a bit

22:04of a rest. if he plays like let's say

22:06above 80 minutes that would be a red

22:08flag in my opinion.

22:09>> I expect him to play the majority of the

22:10game. We'll see. We'll see how the game

22:12goes, but I really expect him to. Let's

22:13see. Let's see. Anyway, thank you very

22:15much, my friend. As always, um this

22:18video won't be coming out too much

22:19before that game so we can uh we can

22:22find out the lineups together. Thank you

22:24guys for watching and listening. As

22:25always, remember, go and sign up to

22:27Fantasy Football Hub right now. Go and

22:29get your AI your AI recommended

22:30transfers. You can have a look at the

22:31optimal wild card team, optimal free hit

22:34team, everything else you could possibly

22:36want to do. Get your team rated for

22:38free. It's all down below.