Free YouTube Transcribe

Video transcript

Rep. Dave Min: "We should be leading the future, not subsidizing the horse and buggy."

Rep. Dave Min · 645 words · 3 min read

Want to search this transcript, jump the video from any line, or download it as TXT, SRT, or VTT?

Open in the transcript tool

Full transcript

0:00I'm sure you're all aware of this, but

0:01uh the Chinese are going around the

0:02world right now selling out of the box

0:05solutions, renewable energy plus

0:06batteries to countries in Africa, Asia,

0:09South America. And these countries you

0:11talk if you talk to their leaders, they

0:12don't necessarily want to take Chinese

0:14technology. They're concerned about

0:15China's influence. Uh but they're so

0:17much cheaper than the oil and gas

0:19infrastructure that we are providing,

0:20that we're offering, that they take

0:21these. And that is a national security

0:24threat to the United States of America.

0:25So, if my Republican colleagues are so

0:27concerned about national security, they

0:28should be doubling down on this because

0:30China right now is eating our lunch

0:31around the world. They're developing a

0:32lot of influence because of their

0:34emphasis on renewables.

0:36Now, um I wanted to ask another couple

0:38questions. Um you mentioned the massive

0:41subsidies for oil and gas, which

0:42includes not only tax credits, but much

0:44of our military expenditures. But I want

0:45to talk about the oil and gas

0:46infrastructure. How does gas get

0:48delivered to our homes, Dr. Wakoff?

0:49>> It gets delivered through pipes.

0:51>> And are those pipes free to install?

0:53>> No. In fact, it used to be that when you

0:55bought gas as a homeowner in Minnesota

0:57to heat, which is how most of us heat,

1:00um about a third of the cost was the

1:03pipes. Now, it's more

1:04>> those pipes last

1:05>> Now, it's more than two thirds of the

1:06cost is

1:07>> Yeah. And how do those pipes last

1:08forever?

1:09>> Nope.

1:09>> Uh they have to be repaired and replaced

1:12periodically, right?

1:13>> Yes.

1:13>> I'm going to just note that um I passed

1:16I know something about this because I

1:17passed legislation in the state of

1:18California, SB 1220 uh 1221, uh which

1:22dealt with this issue. And I talked with

1:23a number of utility companies uh in the

1:25state of California that noted that in

1:27many areas replacing the natural gas

1:29infrastructure was so much more

1:30expensive than moving to all electric

1:33that they could literally replace all of

1:35the uh gas burning appliances, home

1:37heating, uh ranges, stoves, etc. with

1:40all electric. They could replace that

1:42for free. The consumer would actually

1:43have a lower cost. So, free appliances,

1:46lower cost utilities, that sounds like a

1:48great deal, right?

1:49>> Sounds good to me.

1:50>> But the reason that they couldn't do

1:51this was because that they have a duty

1:53to serve. And do you do you know what

1:54the duty to serve is? Could you explain

1:55that briefly?

1:56>> So, the idea is that if you have a gas

1:59facility or your gas company in your

2:01area, it needs to be serving every

2:03customer. If you have an electric

2:04company in your area, it needs to be

2:06willing to serve every customer.

2:07>> And so, that means that they're required

2:09right now under existing law in all 50

2:11states to replace that oil and gas

2:13infrastructure, even if it's more

2:14expensive, even if it doesn't make

2:15economic sense. Uh and so, this is um

2:18crazy. Uh and I would just note that

2:20right now what what these witnesses on

2:22the Republican side are proposing is

2:24reinvesting in aging technology that is

2:26becoming more and more expensive day by

2:28day. As we move forward, it is clear

2:30that renewable energy is the future. It

2:31is going to be cheaper in many places or

2:33is it already is cheaper. And and

2:35doubling down on aging oil and gas

2:36infrastructure is like doubling down on

2:38the horse and buggy or wood burning

2:40stoves. And I'm sure that if this

2:41hearing were taking place in 1926

2:43instead of 2026, these witnesses would

2:45probably be testifying in favor of wood

2:47burning stoves right now. With that, I

2:48yield back.

Recently added transcripts

Browse the whole transcript library

This transcript was generated from the captions YouTube publishes for this video. Get the transcript of any YouTube video atfreeyoutubetranscribe.com, free, unlimited, no sign-up.