Full transcript
0:01The most important subject , which is
0:03about saving money . How do you operate
0:07in terms of smart taxation on stocks ?
0:09I’ll say it right now , not the most
0:11interesting broadcast , but one of the
0:13most important . You are welcome to join
0:15us . Everything about capital market
0:18taxation and how to reduce it .
0:21Investing for beginners . Avner Stepak
0:24and Omer Avinovich help with the first
0:26steps in the world of investing . Okay ,
0:33so today we will talk about a super
0:35important topic . I truly recommend
0:38taking this broadcast we’re doing now
0:40and even listening to it twice . And
0:43it’s not only important for high
0:45amounts . I will tell the person today :
0:47I’ll give a quick demonstration for
0:50someone with 100,000 shekels , and
0:51you’ll realize that for a person with
0:54100,000 shekels , these tips can save
0:56hundreds of thousands of shekels over a
0:58lifetime . Anyone who has more —
1:00sometimes it's millions , sometimes it's
1:03tens of millions . And to understand how
1:05important this is , I will give a small
1:07demonstration for someone with 100,000
1:10shekels at age 18 : let's take a
1:12conservative assumption that every year
1:14that same person buys stocks , sells all
1:16their stocks , swaps their portfolio ,
1:18and therefore makes the same form of
1:20stock returns at 10 % per year . Only
1:23every year , that 25 % is deducted from
1:25them . A tax . Let's take it to
1:31retirement . Meaning , over ah . 47 years ,
1:36for that same person in terms of return
1:39, how do I do the calculation that you
1:41can do yourselves ? You multiply by
1:441.075 . To the power of 47 . And you get
1:52a million , 3 million shekels , which is
1:54very nice . Those same 100,000 shekels
1:57turned into 3 million shekels . If I
2:00take that same number , exactly the same
2:03thing , only instead of saying 7.5 % per
2:06year , meaning I won't multiply it by
2:091.075 , I will multiply it by 1.1 , the
2:1210 % , and pay tax at the end . Meaning we
2:15won't pay every year but will act with
2:17tax deferral . Then we will get instead
2:20of 3 million shekels . 8.8 . Million
2:24shekels . That’s a difference of 5.8
2:27million shekels . From that 8.8 million
2:31shekels we need to deduct 25 % tax . So we
2:34will deduct 2 . Ah , 2.2 % tax . And then we
2:40will get a difference of more than
2:41double the money . Now , for most people
2:44listening to this podcast , for most of
2:47them , I say at least half the listeners
2:49here and now , 3 million shekels is not
2:51a little money . And that’s when you
2:54started with 100,000 shekels . I tell
2:56you , I did this calculation with people
2:58, it comes out to many millions and
3:00tens of millions . Of course , those who
3:02are young have less money . But those
3:05who are older — cheer up , you have more
3:07money , but you have fewer years to live
3:09, so it balances out , so it’s the
3:11same in that regard . And the State of
3:15Israel is a very , very , very friendly
3:18country in terms of taxation for those
3:20who work smart , and very unfriendly for
3:22those who don't work smart . So what we
3:26will do over the next 20 minutes , we
3:28will provide all the tips on how to do
3:30it smartly . Why do I recommend doing
3:33this ? Listening to this podcast twice .
3:36I’m telling you , I speak with , and
3:38high-level clients from the market have
3:40arrived , the most senior you can
3:42imagine in the market here . Ah , people
3:44from high-tech , people who have been
3:46following the podcast for just half a
3:48year , and also those who have been
3:50following the podcast and YouTube for
3:52five years . There are few people ,
3:57almost individuals , who have managed to
3:59do what I will say today ; even though
4:01it is quite clear analytically what
4:03needs to be done , few people actually
4:05do it , and therefore . A : It is
4:10recommended to come for planning in
4:12order to do it , and B. It is
4:13recommended to hear this twice in order
4:15to increase the chance that you will do
4:17some of it on your own . So let's begin :
4:21Why is the State of Israel such a tax
4:24paradise ? Let’s go back to the 80s .
4:29Back then we had inflation of hundreds
4:31of percent per year , meaning a bit like
4:33what is happening in Iran . You start
4:36the month , say a loaf of bread cost 10
4:38NIS , at the end of the month a loaf
4:41cost 13 NIS , the next month it cost 16
4:44NIS , at the end of the year it already
4:46cost 30 NIS , meaning there was 100 %
4:49inflation . As a result , they said wait ,
4:51how do you tax such a thing ? And
4:54therefore it was determined that in the
4:56State of Israel , taxation is real
4:58taxation . What does that mean ? If you
5:01earned , you had 100 NIS , you earned 10
5:04NIS , and the inflation was 4 NIS , you
5:06won't pay tax on the entire 10 NIS , you
5:09will pay only on the 6 NIS , on this gap
5:12, adjusted for inflation , but , and here
5:15is a big but , a terrible but . It does
5:19not apply to dollar investments , and
5:21that means if you earned , you invested
5:23100 dollars , you earned 10 dollars , and
5:26the inflation was in that same period
5:28say 10 % . You won't ... you will still pay
5:34tax from the first shekel on the entire
5:3610 dollars , and therefore Israel is
5:38less encouraging of dollar investments
5:40and less friendly . But we are the State
5:45of the Jews and the wisdom of the Jews ,
5:47it is known like in the Gemara , we are
5:49smart , and every problem has a solution
5:51. So let’s talk about a solution for
5:57those who have dollar investments , but
5:59before we talk about the solution ,
6:00another problem : the State of Israel is
6:03a country that needs money . Okay ? By
6:07the way , it does it well , it takes
6:09money , there is a low deficit here , and
6:11that is a good thing , and so on . And
6:16like in many places in the world , there
6:18is also a " mis-kara , " a wealth tax , or
6:21some refer to it as a surtax . Meaning ,
6:25for anyone who has an income above
6:28721,000 shekels , they don't pay like
6:30what I said , 25 % real tax if it is on
6:33shekel investments — shekel investments
6:36meaning a mutual fund , a training fund
6:38beyond the ceiling , an Israeli stock ,
6:41an Israeli index — they won't pay 25 %
6:43inflation-adjusted , they will pay 30 %
6:46inflation-adjusted or 30 % from the first
6:49shekel if we are in a dollar investment
6:51. Meaning , meaning I invested in Amazon
6:55100 dollars , Amazon went from 100
6:57dollars to 200 dollars , and hello to
6:59Avner , the direct one from the Harvard
7:02program somewhere or there , all there
7:04in Boston . Let me set the background
7:07and I’ll be with you right away . Yes .
7:10That ... so . Wait .
7:15Ah , I know .
7:19Okay .
7:20Okay , let’s continue .
7:22Hello to Avner who joined us from
7:24somewhere from . Harvard or some fancy
7:28academic concept .
7:29Ah , we’ll reach you in a moment , just
7:31in the middle of the explanation . So ,
7:33the same thing , we explained the surtax
7:35.
7:3630 % on the real profit , or 30 % from the
7:38first shekel if it’s a dollar-based
7:41investment . Now , some say , " Okay ,
7:43you're giving an example here of Nvidia
7:46, it was 100 and now it's worth 200. " I
7:48want to give you an improvement : two
7:51clients , two clients started with a
7:53million-shekel portfolio — both ... you
7:56have two clients , not " two " [ feminine ] ,
7:58you know , but two [ masculine ] .
8:01I was waiting , I said , " You're on the
8:03Arvad show and I want you to feel smart
8:05. " I said , " Let's make a mistake at the
8:07beginning , I'll let you be so smart ,
8:09you understand ? Here . "
8:11Nice .
8:11Alright , let's move on .
8:13Anyway , nice . Both started with a
8:16portfolio of a million-something
8:17shekels , pretty similar , and both
8:19reached the 14-15 million range . Now ,
8:21in situations like this , it’s always
8:24a time effect — you've had the
8:26portfolio for a long time , okay ? But
8:28it’s always related , when something
8:30like this happens , to some stock that
8:32made many , many multiples on the money .
8:36In this case , both of them bought
8:39Nvidia back in the day , who knows when ,
8:41and there’s nothing to do ; when a
8:43stock does 20 or 30 times your money ,
8:46even if you invested 200,000 shekels ,
8:48it turns into 6 million , okay ? Of
8:51course , there were other companies . One
8:54difference between the clients : one did
8:56it inside a tax-deferred platform . Both
9:00realized Nvidia was half their
9:02portfolio — one did it in a
9:03tax-deferred platform and one didn't .
9:06The one who did it in a tax-deferred
9:08platform — we'll talk in a moment about
9:10what a tax-deferred platform is — had
9:12zero tax at the sale . The one who did
9:14it in a dollar-based platform not only
9:17paid 30 % tax ( because it's all subject
9:19to surtax , meaning he didn't pay 25 %
9:21from the first shekel , he paid 30 % ) ,
9:24and they didn't deduct inflation , but
9:26worse than that : the dollar also
9:28dropped during that period , and they
9:30don't deduct the dollar's decline .
9:34Meaning , let’s say , let’s say the
9:36person made 5 million shekels on a
9:38200,000 shekel investment — because
9:41those are the numbers , I know it sounds
9:43wild , but it just made imaginary
9:45numbers ( doesn't happen often in life ,
9:47it just needs to happen once ) . So , the
9:525 million he earned , let's say in
9:54dollars — let's say it was two million
9:57dollars — but in shekels it’s only 5
9:59million shekels because the dollar also
10:01fell . Anyway , astronomical gaps in
10:05their wealth , because one had zero tax
10:08and one had 30 % tax , and they didn't
10:10deduct inflation and didn't deduct the
10:13dollar's devaluation . Meaning , the
10:16actual bite was much more than 30 % ,
10:18because in shekel terms let's say he
10:20earned only a certain X , and I
10:22understood , the shekel profit was much ,
10:24much lower than the dollar profit held
10:27in dollars until the end . Therefore , in
10:30the State of Israel , there are all
10:32kinds of options for tax-deferred
10:34platforms that not only defer the tax ,
10:36they also allow you to pay on the real
10:38profit and not on the nominal profit .
10:41The dollar-based one , and it splits —
10:43the investing public is divided into
10:46two : one , those who say " I don't know
10:48how to pick the winning stock " ( by the
10:50way , that’s the vast majority , and
10:52rightly so ) . Okay , chasing stocks —
10:54that was indeed a cool and full story I
10:57told , but let’s put it this way : for
10:59every such story , there are also many
11:01other stories that are less good . And
11:03they say : I will manage the money with
11:05the institutional investors . So here
11:07are some highly recommended
11:09tax-deferral platforms : first , the
11:11investment provident fund — an
11:13excellent product , limited to 80,000 ,
11:16with 25 % tax on real gains after
11:18inflation . And the big bonus is that I
11:22know that a person aged 30 , 35 , or 40
11:24when they deposit into an investment
11:27provident fund gives it almost zero
11:29probability , but the years pass and the
11:31profit grows and grows and grows , and
11:34at age 60 , if you take the money as an
11:36annuity , you can withdraw the money at
11:390 % tax . Now , that sounds like a big
11:45benefit to him , but let’s take this
11:47benefit so you understand the numbers :
11:49just on 80,000 shekels that you
11:51deposited once at age 20 , so the 80,000
11:53shekels at age 20 — after all , we said
11:55in stocks in recent years they doubled
11:58the money every five years , but let’s
12:00assume they double the money every
12:02seven years according to the historical
12:04average , that’s the average . This
12:09means that at the person's age of 27 ,
12:12the 80,000 shekels are 160 , at the
12:15person's age of 35 , the 160 are 320 , at
12:19the person's age of 42 , the 320 are 640
12:22, at the age — where were we ? Because
12:27every seven years you double the money .
12:29You know what ? Times 2 every seven
12:30years you double the money . At what age
12:32were we ? 3 , 42 , 49 , the 640 becomes 1
12:37million 280 . At age 640 , 1 million 280 ?
12:45Yes , I was right . At age 40 , 56 we are
12:48already at 2.5 million . At the age of
12:52... no , we said 49 . At age 56 We are
12:57over 2.5 million . At age 62 we are
13:00already over 5 million . At age 60 we
13:03are already reaching those amounts .
13:05At age 120 we are billionaires , moving
13:07on .
13:08Uh , and now as time goes by you say :
13:10wait , a large tax has already
13:11accumulated , if I cash out all the
13:13money I’ll also pay a high-income tax
13:15. And maybe you won't take that money
13:17out , and you will decide to take that
13:19money as an annuity , because as an
13:21annuity everything is completely exempt
13:22. That is one way , and anyone who is a
13:25licensed dealer , or exempt dealer , can
13:27take the training fund and not just
13:29deposit 20,000 at the end of the year .
13:33You can deposit beyond the ceiling , you
13:35can deposit 100 , 50,000 , a million . The
13:38largest deposit that was made with me
13:40was several tens of millions into a
13:41training fund beyond the ceiling . There
13:43is no limit . And the best plan of all ,
13:47there is a program called Amendment 190
13:49. Listen carefully , even those for whom
13:53this is not relevant , it might be very
13:55relevant to mom and dad , because your
13:57mom and dad are over the age of 60 .
14:00This is a program that will usually be
14:02relevant from age 50 or 55 , unless you
14:04really have a lot of money , and then it
14:06is from a younger age too , because
14:08there is one drawback to the program :
14:10the money is not liquid until age 60 .
14:13But why this drawback ? Amendment 190 is
14:16the best program because you pay 25 % tax
14:19overall . You pay a 15 % nominal tax ,
14:21correct , not inflation-adjusted , but it
14:25is still a 15 % tax . You can switch
14:27tracks , switch institutions , switch
14:29plans , you can do whatever you want ,
14:31and it is not a taxable event . Let's
14:33return for a moment to the beginning ,
14:35the story about stocks abroad . Think
14:38about that Nvidia , or that Amazon , or
14:41that Google : whoever buys it personally
14:44will pay 25 % or 35 % or 30 % with the surtax
14:51– tax at source , with no way to
14:53account for the dollar . Those same
14:56stocks in general , we said , there are
14:58plans at the institutions where you can
15:01choose the track : dollar S & P , shekel ,
15:03shekel Nasdaq , general track – everyone
15:05in the track that suits them . But there
15:09is also an additional plan called [ IRA ]
15:11where you can actually choose the
15:13stocks yourself , and you could buy that
15:15Google , Meta , Amazon , Nvidia , the
15:17Nasdaq index , the S & P index , which is
15:20the holy of holies of the ... I don't
15:22know , high-tech of various kinds ,
15:24although if you sanctify the S & P so
15:26much – it made only half the return of
15:28the Nasdaq , so that's also a point to
15:31think about . But the exact same stocks ,
15:34when you have them , you have zero tax ,
15:37and when you withdraw the money , you
15:39have 15 % tax . For those who have parents
15:41already 60 years of age . Actually , at
15:43age 60 you are already exempt , assuming
15:45you are age 60 and have a pension of
15:47105,000 NIS , and then there are many
15:49parents for whom this is very strange .
15:51They buy stocks in a portfolio when
15:53they could buy stocks in Amendment 190 ,
15:55which is also a portfolio at the bank .
15:57Think , you have a portfolio at Meitav
16:00Dash , one with tax at source , or at
16:02Meitav Dash without tax at source .
16:06Usually in the current , and when you
16:08withdraw 15 % , or a portfolio at Leumi
16:10with tax at source , or at Leumi through
16:13Amendment 190 , then it's the same – you
16:16have no tax at all on buying and
16:18selling . And when you withdraw the
16:20money , it's only 15 % tax , provided you
16:23have two conditions combined : one , that
16:26you don't have ... uh , let's say you are
16:28age 60 and have a pension of 5,000 NIS .
16:32I will pass the floor in a moment to
16:33Avner , but I just want , can I say the
16:35following thing ? A moment before , in
16:37the world of investments , it's what to
16:40invest in . But what I want to say in
16:42this broadcast is that it's no less
16:44important which platform to invest
16:46through . Where does this Sudoku become
16:48complex ? I see it with us . You say ,
16:53wait , I have one platform , the worst is
16:55when they take tax at source , that's
16:57the worst , but I have one platform
16:59where I pay 25 % , correct , it's
17:01inflation-linked like in a study fund
17:04beyond the ceiling for someone who is
17:06self-employed , there is an option for a
17:08platform where perhaps we pay zero tax ,
17:11an investment provident fund or
17:13Amendment 190 , and where is it worth
17:15putting things with the highest return ,
17:17more to where we will pay zero tax or
17:20little tax ?
17:22To where you pay the least tax . Okay ,
17:24now I also feel smart , I corrected
17:27Avner the genius .
17:28Oh boy , oh boy , straight from ... some
17:31kind of university lecture hall . So I
17:35say , you have to match what you invest
17:37in and which platform you choose to
17:38invest through . Those who do it right ,
17:43I tell you , I’ve seen differences of
17:45millions of shekels on the same
17:46investments . Now , who is this for ? For
17:49whom is this most important ? Even more
17:51so . It's important to everyone , but
17:53there are some for whom it's a must .
17:55Who are the folks for whom it's even
17:57more important ? Hi-tech workers with
18:00RSUs . Why is it so important for
18:03hi-tech workers with RSUs ? The State of
18:06Israel has been good to you ; it told
18:08you , " It's on me . " When you received
18:12your vested shares — that is , the
18:13moment the shares are yours and you can
18:15sell them and do whatever you want — I
18:17don't tax you like the United States ,
18:19Ireland , or Europeans do . I only tax
18:23you when you sell the stock , which is a
18:25benefit Israelis have that doesn't
18:26exist abroad . Abroad , usually , the
18:30moment you receive the shares , you're
18:32hit with tax , so you have to sell them .
18:36However , because of this , many Israelis
18:38— you can argue whether it's justified
18:40or not , it obviously depends on the
18:42company — decide not to sell the shares
18:44, and the shares grow and grow and grow
18:46, and these are people who , by
18:47definition , will be in a high tax
18:49bracket when they sell . But wait , what
18:53then ? If you took care to manage your
18:55taxes properly yesterday — meaning ,
18:57you’re listening to this podcast ,
18:59you’re doing exactly what I say
19:01immediately , and you’re working with
19:02tax-deferred platforms . Meaning those
19:05that defer tax so that when you buy and
19:07sell there or change tracks , it’s not
19:09a taxable event . So let's say I
19:12profited , I made a million shekels in a
19:14tax-deferred platform ; for income tax
19:16purposes , it’s as if I earned zero .
19:19Why ? Because everything that happens
19:21inside the world of tax deferral is
19:23irrelevant . Okay ? It's not a taxable
19:27event . And then , if you want to sell
19:29your RSUs , those same shares you
19:31received ( and it doesn't matter if you
19:33work at Google , Amazon , or any other
19:35company ) , you could sell 721,000
19:37shekels worth without having to pay
19:39that excess tax ( high-bracket tax ) . So ,
19:42if you aren't working at all , then on
19:45that , on the full 721 ; and if you do
19:47have an income , there's a 3 % and 5 %
19:49excess tax ( that’s not our main topic
19:52, but it’s good to know — 1,721,000
19:54shekels of annual income ) , you will pay
19:57an extra 5 % on the excess amount .
19:59Meaning , the 3 % excess tax plus another
20:022 % . 721 , that's what it will save you .
20:05But if you aren't working at all or
20:07you're between jobs and you're selling ,
20:09you can literally sell 721,000 shekels
20:11without paying that 5 % . In other words ,
20:13for hi-tech workers , it’s not just
20:15tax-deferred instruments — that is , tax
20:17deferral — it’s not just real
20:19taxation instead of nominal ( if it’s
20:20a study fund ) , it’s not just
20:22tax-exempt ( if it’s Amendment 190 ) ;
20:27It additionally allows them to sell
20:28those same RSUs without the excess tax .
20:33Therefore , for high-tech workers or
20:34people who hold shares or companies ,
20:36who today , according to the law , anyone
20:38who owns a company must distribute a
20:40dividend to themselves , these are
20:42people , because a law was passed that
20:44anyone who owns a company has 6 percent
20:46of a dividend they must distribute .
20:48People like Avner are an example , ah no
20:50, Avner , you are a large company .
20:52Not really , yes , I am forced to pull
20:54out a dividend even when I don't want
20:56to , yes , because of that .
20:58Okay , that too , so .
21:02So these are people for whom tax
21:04deferral is even more important ,
21:06because this dividend is actually
21:08income , and then if they work with tax
21:10deferral , at least 721,000 shekels out
21:13of this dividend will not be subject to
21:15surplus tax , which is an advantage ; if
21:17you didn't work with tax deferral , the
21:20entire dividend would probably be taxed
21:22with surplus tax . Meaning , business
21:27owners , people from high-tech , things
21:29like that , it's even more important for
21:31them to be careful about the worlds of
21:33tax deferral . And the State of Israel
21:36is kind and generous and allows for
21:38multiple and different platforms , also
21:40for the self-employed , also for this .
21:44And and because of that , all those who
21:46are complaining now , because they
21:48taught us to say : " Ah , the State of
21:50Israel is cruel . " Wow , the State of
21:53Israel is good for high-tech people !
21:56There is no tax on wealth , we don't
21:58have inheritance taxes here , there is
22:00no tax on a first apartment . It is
22:01possible to work on platforms with tax
22:03deferral . You just have to be smart and
22:07do it . And I tell you , in our planning
22:10meetings — even when you listen to this
22:13episode — usually I invite you to come
22:15to us . Even until you come and do it
22:17with someone specifically , many times
22:19it simply doesn't happen . It surprises
22:21me anew , but that is the reality . Avner
22:23, where are you ? Where are you
22:25broadcasting from ? Tell everyone .
22:28I am in a CEO course at Harvard , really
22:30in Boston at the university , I returned
22:32to boot camp , student dorms behind me ,
22:35can you believe it ? So yes , actually
22:38it's fun here .
22:39Give us an insight already from the
22:41course , it's very intensive , I know , I
22:43know , they study from morning to night ,
22:45six days a week , no discounts , only on
22:47Sunday they don't study , and even then
22:50you have to study everything you have
22:52for the next week , but ah , it's fine .
22:54One that you want to share already .
22:56Wow , that's not for now , let's do that
22:58maybe , let me think , in the next
23:00episode , so to speak , something else ,
23:02something else that is important , but I
23:04have a lot to say about taxes .
23:06You arrived in all the pension worlds ,
23:08tricks and shticks for high-tech people
23:10or just people who want to defer taxes ,
23:12tax-deferral tools like investment
23:14provident funds and so on . I want to
23:16talk for a moment about the basics of
23:18people who just buy stocks or index
23:20funds through tracking funds like that ,
23:22and they have an account at the bank or
23:24an account at Meitav Dash or anywhere
23:26else . And I want to mention , actually ,
23:28the basic principles of taxation . We
23:30talked about the fact that there is a
23:32tax , in 90 - something percent of the
23:34products the tax is 25 percent on your
23:36real profit . You bought a Check Point
23:39stock on the stock market , you made
23:41money , you sold it , you paid a tax of a
23:43quarter of the real profit , meaning for
23:45.
23:46Wait , wait , if it's an Israeli-American
23:48stock , it's 25 percent nominal , meaning
23:50.
23:52We are talking about an Israeli stock
23:53here , let’s say for simplicity that
23:55you bought Bank Hapoalim .
23:58You earned 8 % per year for three years .
24:02You have to pay tax . How much tax ? A
24:04quarter of the real profit . Let's do a
24:06simple calculation : suppose in a
24:08certain year you sold that stock and
24:10you are in profit , and you held it for
24:12exactly a year . You made an 8 % profit on
24:14the stock — the nominal rate , as it's
24:16called , before adjusting for inflation .
24:18But in those 12 months that you held
24:21Bank Leumi — I mean Bank Hapoalim ,
24:23sorry — inflation rose by 3 % . Meaning ,
24:27for tax purposes , your profit isn't the
24:298 % nominal , but 5 % , which is the real
24:32profit — 8 minus 3 for inflation . And
24:35you need to pay a quarter of that 5 % ,
24:38which is 1.25 % . What are you left with
24:40in your hand ? 6.75 % . 6.75 % , which is
24:45the 8 % gross you made minus the tax . It
24:50turns out effectively that what we call
24:53a 25 % real tax is roughly 15 % — it's not
24:55exact , it depends on inflation , of
24:57course , on your profit . Basically you
25:01made eight , you stayed with 6.75 , okay ?
25:04Now , in principle , any losses you have
25:07— and again , when I say profits and
25:09losses , we are not talking about on
25:11paper ( you didn't buy a stock that
25:13dropped 90 % but you didn't sell ) — these
25:15are realized losses . Remember that for
25:18income tax , both for profits and losses
25:20, all the accounting is based on
25:22profits and losses that were actually
25:24realized . Okay , for that matter , and I
25:27will say one more thing : the accounting
25:29is indeed within a calendar year , which
25:31is the automatic calculation the bank
25:33or the brokerage firm like Meitav Trade
25:35will do for you . But theoretically , if
25:39you are in a situation where you paid
25:41excess tax , the accumulated losses you
25:43have for tax purposes , this tax shield
25:45goes with you to the next year and
25:46beyond , and there is always the option ,
25:49if the amount is significant to you , to
25:51go to the tax authority proactively and
25:53receive a refund . I will give a
25:57practical example : wait , we are in 2026
26:00, but this is true every year , you are
26:02now ... in all the months from January to
26:04September you earned 70,000 shekels
26:07realized . Okay ? You might have a profit
26:12of 200,000 in your portfolio , but
26:1470,000 of it is actually from stocks
26:16you sold during this year . And then
26:20suddenly in the last months of the year
26:21there are heavy losses , and I see a lot
26:23of what remains in your portfolio . Many
26:26of them recorded a loss , okay ? A
26:29historical loss , not just in those
26:31three months but since you bought them .
26:34Okay , and now you will sell that same
26:36stock that lost value , let's say you
26:38are down 50,000 shekels on it . I
26:40deliberately want to give relatively
26:42dramatic examples . Okay , on the 70,000
26:44you already paid tax . The bank or trade
26:47firm already collected from you in
26:49April , May , June , and on all the sales ,
26:51you already paid tax . At the end of
26:55that calendar year you have losses . In
26:57principle , if we were to look at the
26:58whole year together , it could be that
27:00you pay tax only on 20,000 shekels
27:02profit , right ? Because you earned 70
27:05realized , and lost 50 realized . Okay ,
27:08so you're left with a net profit of
27:09only 20 , but the profits came before
27:11the loss ; the profits were already
27:13taxed , and now you have a loss . In such
27:16a situation , you can proactively go to
27:18the tax authority at the beginning of
27:20next year , at the start of '27 , and say
27:22: " Guys , you taxed me this year on 50
27:24or 70 thousand in profit , even though I
27:27actually only earned 20 ; refund the
27:29excess tax to me . " That is an option .
27:32Another option is simply to say : " Okay ,
27:34the tax shield is these losses I had in
27:36... "
27:37You carry it over automatically in a
27:39master account ; it’s an eternal , it's
27:41not ...
27:43But my recommendation is , often if you
27:45have a large loss in some stock , sell
27:47it before all the profitable papers you
27:50have .
27:52Buy it back .
27:53Yes .
27:54And then when you sell , first of all ,
27:55you'll feel good because you won't see
27:57it in the red anymore , and then you'll
27:59receive ... ...
28:00In retrospect , the question is whether
28:02I want to buy them back or not . If the
28:05answer is — look , this is a trick that ,
28:07psychologically , is not bad . When you
28:11see a security at a loss , you don't
28:12want to sell it because you don't want
28:14to realize the loss .
28:16Until it returns to the principal .
28:17This tax , right now , is often a reason
28:19why it's not a good security . This tax
28:22is essentially your way to emotionally
28:24justify to yourself why you are selling
28:25it now . Now , if you sell it and you
28:28feel in your gut : " Wow , I need to buy
28:30this , " then it's probably a good buy .
28:33But often you'll feel : " So I sold it ,
28:34fine , let's not buy it back , " and
28:36you've done yourself a double favor . We
28:38need to .
28:39We are already towards the end , so I
28:41want to say two last things .
28:43One , as I said , forget the psychology
28:45behind it for a moment . Essentially ,
28:49you have stocks at a significant loss ;
28:51you can sell them and buy them back .
28:53True , it involves a small , negligible
28:55commission , but you are basically
28:57resetting the tax basis , locking in the
28:59loss for tax purposes so you can offset
29:01it later against profits that were made
29:04or will be made going forward . And two ,
29:07you are now starting the tax only from
29:09the lower level , but again , until you
29:12sell the stock the second time , you
29:14obviously won't pay on it . Second issue
29:17, do you go to the tax authority or not
29:19? Again , it's just a function of the
29:22size of your profit . Because if it's
29:25significant , you might say : " I don't
29:27want to wait for the future when I can
29:30offset the excess tax they collected
29:32from me ; I want it now , a few months
29:34into '27 . " If it's not significant ,
29:37don't bother with the tax authority ;
29:39it's not worth it . You don't lose
29:41anything by it ; your tax balances
29:43continue with you . And Yoav , not now ,
29:45Irit is writing here that you don't
29:47need to go to the tax authority unless
29:49you are investing in more than one bank
29:51; the bank itself constantly offsets
29:53losses against profits throughout the
29:55year . But it's the same question again :
29:57if you had a profit earlier , the bank
29:58already offset it , I don't know if it
30:00can refund it or not . Honestly , that's
30:01a good question that needs checking . I
30:03mean Avner , if the bank sold something
30:05at a profit and already transferred the
30:07money to the tax authority , does the
30:09bank automatically refund it when you
30:11sell at a loss ?
30:13No , no , I was saying if , if in the
30:15first eight months , for example , you
30:17had tax and then a loss occurred .
30:21Your only way is either to carry the
30:23loss forward or to the tax authority ,
30:25right . And yes , you can sell and buy a
30:29day later ; it's hard for the tax
30:31authority to claim it's a fictitious
30:33transaction . Again , if you did it in
30:35the exact same second , then maybe ,
30:36second after second , perhaps yes .
30:38I also haven't seen him claim , like
30:40anyone else , this thing , this one . In
30:42general , we need to wrap up , but listen
30:45carefully : for those who join us at "
30:47Mashki'anim , " today we will talk about
30:49how it happens that even though
30:51interest rates keep rising in the
30:53United States — at least the long-term
30:55rates , which makes debt more expensive
30:57and everything — the market keeps going
30:59up . And does it have the potential to
31:02keep rising , or will the party come to
31:03an end ? So you are welcome to join us ,
31:06we have to move on .
31:07And I'll just say to Tzvika Arnik who
31:09asked us about offsets for the disabled
31:11, I left you a private message , respond
31:13to it , you'll see it in the chat , ah ,
31:15and we'll answer you separately . It
31:17doesn't justify a podcast , let's call
31:19it that , but definitely for the
31:21disabled , you should know there are
31:23more tax benefits , and now we're moving
31:25on .
31:25Okay .