Full transcript
Can you learn calculus in 3 hours?
0:03can you learn calculus in the time it
0:04takes to watch a long movie yes you can
0:08my name is Dennis Davis I'm an engineer
0:11not a mathematician I try to make my
0:14videos visually enlightening and
0:16fast-paced but this video is very long
0:19because it covers almost the entire
0:21first year of calculus using visuals
0:24graphs and
0:27diagrams I'd rather show you calculus
0:29visual then just tell you the rules and
0:31formulas if you see where the rules and
0:34formulas come from that can help you
0:36understand remember and make use of them
0:39to become truly proficient at calculus
0:41you'll need practice which you won't get
0:44just by watching this video in the
0:46description I'll link to some helpful
0:48practice oriented videos by
0:51others whether you're new to calculus
0:53studying it now or just want a refresher
0:56I hope you'll find this video
0:58informative and engaging my only
1:00assumptions are that you're already
1:02familiar with functions and algebra so
1:05here we
1:06go calculus is the study of change and
1:09rates of change of mathematical
1:11functions when we use calculus we
1:14perform operations on functions that
1:17result in different functions this isn't
1:20a new idea at all we perform operations
1:23such as addition on numbers to get new
1:27numbers we operate on sets to get new
1:30sets on matrices to get new
1:34matrices and we can operate on functions
1:37to get new functions in fact you've
1:40probably already done this in algebra
1:42when you had a function and found its
1:44inverse we start with a function f ofx
1:48and write out F in terms of X and Y so
1:51that y equals some function of X then we
1:54rewrite the equation switching X and Y
1:58then solve the second equation for y and
2:01that's the inverse of the first
2:04function so we start with a
2:07function perform an operation on it and
2:10get a new function the point is taking
2:13an existing function and Performing some
2:16operation on it to get a new function
2:18isn't a new or advanced math concept and
2:21that's really what calculus is in fact
Calculus is all about performing two operations on functions
2:24calculus is all about performing two
2:27operations on functions that's it that's
2:30calculus the first operation is called
2:34differentiation when we differentiate a
2:36function the new resulting function is
2:38called the derivative of the first
2:40function the derivative is the first
2:43topic we'll cover learning to take the
2:45derivative of a wide variety of function
2:47types is roughly the first semester of
2:51calculus the second calculus operation
2:54is called integration when we integrate
2:56a function the new resulting function is
2:59called the integral of the first
3:01function integration is roughly the
3:04second semester of
3:06calculus and there's a wonderful
3:07relationship between these two
3:09operations that we'll get to at just the
3:11right
3:12time when functions are simple these
3:15operations are simple and calculus is
3:17simple it's when the functions we
3:20operate on get complex that calculus
3:22seems complex so if calculus has a
3:25reputation for being a difficult subject
3:28it's not really calculus
3:30fault we'll start with the derivative
Rate of change as slope of a straight line
3:33and consider a simple function f ofx = x
3:37-1 this is a linear function so its
3:40graph is a straight line I said calculus
3:43was the study of change and rates of
3:45change and the rate of change of a
3:47straight line is its slope rise over run
3:51deltay over Delta
3:53X I like to color code things in my
3:56videos I'm using blue for x coordinates
3:58and distances and yellow for y and I'll
4:02use pink for slope or rates of change I
4:05won't draw a lot of attention to the
4:06colors and may not mention them again
4:09but their consistent use may let you see
4:11some apparent order or pattern that
4:13might not otherwise be
4:15clear for a straight line it's easy to
4:18find the slope just pick any two points
4:20and subtract their y and x coordinates
4:23to get Delta y over Delta X Delta Y is 3
4:27- 0 this distance the difference between
4:30the yellow y-coordinates and Delta X is
4:344 min-1 this distance the difference
4:37between the blue x coordinates so for
4:40this linear function the slope is 3 over
4:433 or POS 1 for every unit X changes y
4:48changes by one times that amount since
4:50the slope is
4:51one if the slope were positive 1/2 then
4:55when X changes by some amount y changes
4:58by positive 1/2 as much if the slope
5:01were -2 then when X changes y changes by
5:05-2 times as much that is two times as
5:08much but in the opposite direction y
5:11would get smaller as X gets
5:14larger when the graph line is horizontal
5:17the slope is zero because y never
5:19changes so Delta Y is zero when the
5:23graph line is vertical the slope is
5:25undefined because X never changes Delta
5:28X is zero so Delta y over Delta X is
5:31undefined since the denominator is
5:35zero everything's nice and simple when
The dilemma of the slope of a curvy line
5:37the function is linear but what about
5:39the function FX = x^2 - 2x + 1 the graph
5:45of this function is a parabola so now
5:47the question what's the slope prompts a
5:50new question in response where do you
5:53mean because the slope is smoothly
5:56changing it's different at different
5:58points
6:04suppose we want to define the slope of
6:06the function at xals 1.6 here now if you
6:10know calculus or more specifically the
6:12rules of differentiation that we'll
6:14cover soon then within a few seconds you
6:17can figure out that the slope at x = 1.6
6:20is
6:211.2 if you don't know calculus yet I
6:24promise that soon you'll know how to do
6:26this but without calculus it's not easy
6:29f after all slope is rise over run
6:31deltay over Delta X but with just one
6:34point where does Delta Y come from or
6:37Delta X slope is the rate of change and
6:40there's no change at a single point
6:42there's only a change between two points
6:45so it's a tricky question we could
6:48eyeball it by drawing our best attempt
6:50at a line tangent to the curve at x =
6:531.6 then measure the slope it won't be
6:56very accurate it's not always easy to
6:58draw an accurate tangent line but
7:01without calculus that might be an option
7:03but let me show another way in the 1600s
The slope between very close points
7:06the great minds that developed calculus
7:09approach the problem this way I'll zoom
7:12in on our grid at the red point of
7:14Interest where x equals
7:161.6 we want to know the slope at the red
7:19point I warnant you I like to color code
7:21things let's choose a nearby Point green
7:25and find the slope deltay over Delta X
7:28between red red and green so we estimate
7:32the slope at red as the slope of the
7:35pink line between red and green Delta y
7:38over Delta X it'll be pretty close and
7:41the closer green is to Red the better
7:43the
7:45estimate this is the approach that will
7:47lead us to the derivative the x value of
7:49our red point where we want to know the
7:51slope is
7:531.6 we find the Y value by plugging 1.6
7:57into the function and we get 0.
8:0036 let's choose a nearby x value for the
8:03Green Point let's say
8:061.61 so we find the yvalue for the
8:09nearby Green Point by plugging
8:121.61 into our function to get 361
8:161201 remember here's our function y =
8:20x^2 - 2x + 1 we can easily find the
8:24slope deltay over Delta X between two
8:27points given their coordinates
8:34and we get
8:351.21 the slope between red and green
8:39which is our estimate for the slope at
8:41Red calculus will tell us I promise that
8:45the slope at Red is 1.2 so our estimate
8:48is very close the closer we let green
8:51get to Red the closer the estimate will
8:53get to
8:551.2 so let's prove it we'll still choose
8:58a nearby Green Point point but now
9:00instead of choosing an actual small
9:02distance away from Red such as
9:040.1 or
9:07.001 we'll use a variable for the tiny X
9:10distance to green and call it
9:12h the coordinates of the red Point are
9:15still 1.6 comma
9:180.36 but let's consider the coordinates
9:21of the Green Point its x coordinate is
9:231.6 + H and its y-coordinate is the
9:27function's value when we plug in 1.6 + H
9:32for
9:33X now let's find the slope as Delta y
9:36over Delta X Delta Y is the y-coordinate
9:40of the Green Point F of 1.6 + H minus
9:44the y-coordinate of the red point which
9:46is still
9:480.36 I'm shading the components to the
9:50color of the corresponding point and
9:53Delta X is the x coordinate at Green 1.6
9:56+ H minus the x coordinate at red
10:001.6 the denominator Delta X looks pretty
10:04easy to simplify 1.6 + H - 1.6 is simply
10:09H this makes sense we chose H over here
10:13to be Delta X so to find Delta y over
10:16Delta X we'll need to expand this
10:18expression by taking our function f ofx
10:21and rewriting it substituting 1.6 + H in
10:25for
10:26X this is just algebra so I'm showing it
10:30quickly pause if you want to step
10:32through the
10:35details we end up with this expression
10:38for the yalue of the nearby Green Point
10:41so we can now find deltay over Delta x
10:4536 + 1.2 H + h^ 2
10:50-36 all over
10:53H the +36 and minus. 36 cancel leaving
10:58us with 1.2 H + h^2 over H as long as H
11:04is not zero which it's not it's some
11:07tiny tiny change but not zero then we
11:10can cancel an H from each term and the
11:13slope Delta y over Delta X is 1.2 + H
11:18let's remember that we said H was an
11:20arbitrarily small number we're going to
11:22find the limit of Delta y over Delta X
11:25as H approaches zero you may be familiar
11:28with the concept of the limit from
The limit
11:30studying discontinuous functions in
11:33algebra we write the limit like this l i
11:36m and underneath a variable right arrow
11:40and a literal value we read this as the
11:43limit as H approaches zero in our case
11:46the limit of 1.2 + H as H approaches
11:50zero as H gets closer and closer to zero
11:54the expression 1.2 + H gets closer and
11:57closer to 1.2
11:59so the limit is 1.2 and that's deltay
12:03over Delta X the slope at the red point
12:06or at least the slope as Delta X we
12:09called it h approaches
12:13zero and now we can continue our
12:16dialogue what's the slope where do you
12:19mean at x =
12:211.6 the slope there is 1.2 that we found
12:25by taking the slope between two very
12:27close points at the limit as the
12:29difference between their x coordinates
12:31approach
12:33zero I want to review this equation
12:36again which is how we estimate the slope
12:38of a function at a point using algebra
12:41you'll see this important expression in
12:43the first chapter of every single
12:45calculus textbook we're going to use it
12:47several more times and I want to make
12:49sure you're comfortable with it it's the
12:52algebra behind estimating the slope at
12:54the red Point as the slope between the
12:56red point and the nearby Green Point the
12:59Delta y over Delta X the difference
13:02between the y-coordinates is Delta y the
13:04numerator of our slope estimate the
13:07difference between the x coordinates is
13:09Delta X the denominator of our slope
13:12estimate we just need to come up with
13:14expressions for these differences the x
13:17coordinate of the red point is simply X
13:20so the red y-coordinate is the
13:22function's value at x f
13:25ofx the x coordinate of the nearby Green
13:28Point is X x + H H is the small Delta x
13:32amount we added to X to get a nearby
13:34point so the green y coordinate is the
13:37function's value at x + h f of X+
13:42H so for the numerator we can plug in
13:44the difference F ofx + hus F ofx I can
13:49include the green and red memory aid y
13:51coordinate of green minus y coordinate
13:54of red for the denominator we get x + H
13:57- x green x coordinate minus red x
14:02coordinate well it doesn't get written
14:04out this way very often since x + H - x
14:07so obviously simplifies to H and H is
14:11the small distance we deliberately chose
14:13for Delta X in the first place so the
14:15denominator is usually just H same thing
14:19so when you see this expression please
14:22think of this triangle and the rise
14:24overrun slope it represents Delta y over
14:27Delta X two quick points first I'm
14:31illustrating a positive slope but if the
14:33slope were negative the expression will
14:35correctly result in a negative estimate
14:37for the slope since f ofx is greater
14:40than F ofx + H subtracting a larger
14:43number from a smaller will result in a
14:45negative number H is always positive
14:48since it's the small Delta X we added to
14:51X so the equation works for positive and
14:54negative
14:55slopes the second point is the key idea
14:58that uses this expression as the
14:59entryway into calculus let me make a
15:02copy of the diagram and expression the
15:05top and bottom start out identical but
15:07I'm going to make changes to the bottom
15:09to transform it step by step into the
15:12key Foundation of
15:14calculus we used the limit a moment ago
15:16to find that the slope of our function
15:18was
15:191.2 when we take the limit as Delta X
15:22approaches 0 something very special
15:24happens first the nearby Green Point
15:27approaches the red Point that's pretty
15:29obvious since H is the distance between
15:31their x coordinates and it's approaching
15:34zero second the expression is no longer
The derivative (and differentials of x and y)
15:37an estimate of the slope it is the slope
15:40or what we call the derivative so let me
15:42change the header the expression at the
15:45limit isn't the algebraic estimate of
15:47the slope it's the algebraic definition
15:50of the derivative and there's one more
15:52important change at the limit Delta Y
15:55and Delta X get new names and symbols
15:57they're called Dy Y and DX the d stands
16:01for differential we'll talk more about
16:03it soon on the top is the estimated
16:06slope of a curve based on nearby points
16:09on the bottom is the definition of the
16:11derivative at the limit is the
16:13horizontal distance between the two
16:15points approaches
16:17zero so here's how we use the limit to
16:20find the derivative at
16:221.6 there was a lot of algebra involved
16:24to get to our answer 1.2 but no calculus
16:28yet
16:29you might not believe me but you will
16:31soon calculus is easier than taking
16:34limits taking limits with algebra is
16:37tedious this is tedious certainly not
16:41difficult but timec consuming and prone
16:43to errors if you're not careful and when
16:46I promised to show you how you could
16:47know almost immediately that the slope
16:49at 1.6 was 1.2 I was not talking about
16:53doing all this algebra in your head
16:56calculus is easier than this and I'll
16:58show you there's just one more key step
17:01the destination will make the journey
17:03worth it so we just found the slope of
17:06the function at x = 1.6 by plugging 1.6
17:10into the function and finding the slope
17:12to a nearby Green Point now let's see
17:15what happens when we generalize we'll
17:18algebraically evaluate Delta y over
17:20Delta X at the variable value X instead
17:24of the specific value 1.6
17:29the Delta y over Delta X formula has the
17:32same Parts the y-coordinate of the
17:34nearby Green Point is f ofx + H the
17:37y-coordinate of the red point is f
17:40ofx the x coordinate of the Green Point
17:43is x + H and the x coordinate of the red
17:46point is X the denominator of course
17:49simplifies to
17:51H so when we expand f of x + H we get x
17:55+ h^ 2 - 2 * x + h H + 1 and you can see
18:01the correspondence to the terms in the
18:04function we just plug in x + H for X
18:08expand and simplify using algebra so
18:11here's the x coordinate of the Green
18:13Point in terms of X it's the first term
18:16in the numerator of our deltay over
18:19Delta X slope
18:21expression next we need to subtract F
18:23ofx which is right here minus f ofx
18:32three terms
18:35cancel and we're left with these terms
18:38as Delta y h^2 + 2 xh - 2
18:43H the denominator is H the arbitrarily
18:47small number we chose for Delta
18:49X we cancel an H from each term and get
18:53Delta y/ Delta x = h + 2x - 2 let's let
18:58take the limit as H approaches Z we get
19:012x -
19:032 now let's pause for a moment and
19:06appreciate what we've just done we have
19:09an expression for the slope of the
19:11function y = x^2 - 2x + 1 in terms of X
19:18have we just found a function that
19:19Returns the slope of another
19:22function let's call the second function
19:25fime of X and try it out more on this
19:28prime notation
19:30shortly a moment ago we found that the
19:32slope at x = 1.6 is 1.2 so let's try out
19:37our new general function frime of X at
19:411.6 we get 2 * 1.6 - 2 3.2 - 2 yes we
19:49get 1.2 just like before let's try this
19:53point at the vertex of the parabola
19:55where xal 1 it looks like the slope we
19:58get should be zero frime of 1 = 2 * 1 -
20:032 yes it's zero and we have indeed found
20:07the function frime of X that Returns the
20:10slope of f ofx for any value of x and
20:14now we can finish our dialogue with the
20:16broader question what's the slope of
20:19this function at any X and the answer
20:22for this function is 2x - 2 because this
20:25will return the slope of x^2 - 2x + 1
20:29for any
20:30X so we've just performed the first
20:33calculus operation
20:35differentiation we started with a
20:37function f ofx = x^2 - 2x + 1 and we
20:42performed an operation on it to yield a
20:44new function the first function's
20:46derivative fime of x = 2x - 2 the
20:50derivative of a function evaluates to
20:53the slope of that function at every x
20:56value we found the derivative the hard
20:59way by taking limits and crunching
21:01through algebra I'll show a simpler way
21:03in a moment but regardless of the method
21:06we've just performed the differentiation
21:08operation to get the derivative of a
21:12function since the derivative of a
21:14function is just another function we can
21:17graph it also the pink line is fime of X
21:21= 2x -
21:222 frime of X is a common notation for
21:26the derivative of f ofx I'll cover some
21:29notation conventions in a moment the
21:32pink line represents the derivative of
21:34the white Parabola so of course the
21:36derivatives value at x = 1.6 is 1.2 the
21:42slope of the parabola at x =
21:461.6 let's go over some vocabulary and
Differential notation
21:49notation concerning derivatives with
21:51slopes we quite naturally speak of Delta
21:54y over Delta X the slope between two
21:57points this ratio gets closer and closer
22:00to the slope at X as Delta X gets closer
22:03and closer to zero in calculus we
22:06introduced new terms for Delta X and
22:08Delta y that have the limit as Delta X
22:11approaches zero concept built in we say
22:15that the limit as Delta X approaches
22:17zero of Delta X is DX we use lowercase D
22:21instead of the Greek letter Delta as
22:23calculus shorthand that means at the
22:26limit so when you see D it means means
22:28at the limit as the change to the
22:30independent variable often X approaches
22:34zero one more time instead of writing
22:36all this you can just write this which
22:39means the same thing it's common to
22:42think of DX as the slightest tiniest
22:44change in X and this thought might serve
22:46you well but DX is really whatever Delta
22:49X becomes as it gets closer and closer
22:51to zero it's an idea that we treat like
22:55a number DX is called the different
22:58differential of X I'll have to draw it
23:00with some sort of thickness so we can
23:02see it but it's actually unimaginably
23:06narrow Dy is the differential of Y which
23:09is Delta Y at the limit but it's not the
23:12limit as Delta y approaches zero like DX
23:15it's also the limit as Delta X
23:17approaches zero Dy is the interesting
23:20thing we observe as Delta X gets closer
23:23and closer to
23:25zero so at the limit as Delta X
23:27approaches zer our ratio Delta y over
23:30Delta X becomes dy/ DX this is the
23:34derivative the ratio Dy / DX is the
23:38differential of Y with respect to X it's
23:42often set out loud as Dy by DX or simply
23:47dydx let me show you some other ways you
23:49might see the derivative
23:52represented this notation denotes a
23:54differential change in something with
23:56respect to X we can pull the something
23:59out of the ratio it means the same thing
24:02this part means the change or derivative
24:04with respect to X and this part is what
24:07we're taking the derivative
24:09of since yal F ofx we could also write d
24:13by DX of f ofx it means the same thing
24:17and since F ofx = x^2 - 2x + 1 we could
24:21also write d by DX of x^2 - 2x + 1 they
24:26all mean the same thing hopefully the
24:29symbology is
24:30clear differential of something with
24:34respect to the corresponding
24:36differential of
24:38X I mentioned this one earlier but
24:40derivatives of functions can also be
24:43represented with the prime or single
24:45quote character fime of X is the
24:48derivative of f ofx so these are all
24:51different representations of the same
24:53calculus concept the derivative of f ofx
24:56with respect to X
24:59we've been using X and Y as our
25:01independent and dependent variables
25:03which is quite natural considering these
25:04are the standard cartisian coordinate
25:06system variables and we often represent
25:09the dependent variable y as a function
25:11of the independent variable X like this
25:14but you should know that other variables
25:16can be used for example in physics and
25:18Engineering the independent variable is
25:21often time if the function we're
25:23operating on represents something that
25:25can change over time for example s equal
25:28F of T could represent the displacement
25:30of a particle from a starting point at
25:32time
25:34T in this case the derivative of the
25:37function is DS by DT not Dy by DX I just
25:42don't want you to get locked into X and
25:43Y and not recognize calculus Concepts
25:46when you see them referencing different
25:49variables as it happens the independent
25:51variable t for time is so common that
25:54there's an additional shorthand
25:55representation for the derivative of a
25:58function function with respect to time F
26:00dot a function label with a DOT over it
26:04represents the derivative of that
26:05function with respect to
26:08time now let's go over the basic rules
26:11of differentiation which are rules and
26:14techniques to find the derivative of
26:16various types of functions and the big
26:18payoff is that the rules will let us
26:20find the derivatives without the timec
26:22consuming process of taking
26:25limits covering the rules of
26:27differentiation will take some time as
26:29this is essentially the entire first
26:31semester of calculus and I'm going to
26:34take limits to show you that the rules
26:35are true and correct and give you
26:37insight into why they
26:40work on the left are five types of
26:43functions each rule is a special
26:45shortcut for taking the derivative of
26:47that function type the shortcuts are a
26:50result of observing the pattern that
26:52reveals itself when we take the limit
26:55you'll see what I mean on the right side
26:57are the the rules or shortcuts for how
26:59to find the derivatives of combinations
27:02of function Types on the left so that
27:05you don't give up hope let me tell you
27:07exactly what we'll be doing I'll start
27:09with these four rules on the top then
27:12I'll show you some super shortcuts
27:13involving these four rules at this point
27:17I'll keep my promise because you'll be
27:19able to differentiate x^2 - 2x + 1
27:22almost instantly in your head and you'll
27:25know that the derivative at x = 1.6 is
27:28is
27:291.2 by this time we'll know enough
27:31calculus to set up and solve some
27:33interesting problems then I'll introduce
27:35the second derivative and higher order
27:37derivatives and then we'll finish the
27:39rules of differentiation with these last
27:42five rules I'll show this agenda again
27:44so we can keep track of our progress
27:46covering these topics we'll finish the
27:48first calculus operation differentiation
27:52after that we'll learn the second
27:53calculus operation integration so let's
27:56Dive In we'll start with the derivative
The constant rule of differentiation
27:59of a constant if we have a function f
28:02ofx equals a constant such as 3 its
28:05graph would be a horizontal line I'm
28:07going to make constants green no matter
28:10what value we choose for X on the
28:12horizontal axis the function returns
28:14three and the slope is zero this is true
28:17for any constant C since there's no
28:20change to the function's value as X
28:22changes the derivative is
28:25zero we write the generalization like
28:27this
28:28d by DX of C equals 0 where C is any
28:32constant it says that the derivative of
28:35a constant is zero and that's the
28:37constant rule we're not cheating or
28:39saying anything new if we were to again
28:42let two points get closer and closer to
28:44each other and apply the limit to the
28:46slope expression we would get zero we'd
28:49get zero every time because we'd always
28:51get C minus C
28:54here all of these rules of
28:56differentiation are General ations of
28:58what happens to the slope as we take the
29:00limit we simply notice the pattern like
29:03we did here for constants and then use
29:06the pattern instead of taking limits and
29:09that's why calculus at least
29:11differentiation is easier than
29:14algebra the next pattern or rule of
The power rule of differentiation
29:16differentiation is called the power rule
29:19heads up the power rule is a big part of
29:22how you can take the derivative of x^2 -
29:242x + 1 in your head I'll the rule with
29:28some examples then I'll show how it can
29:30be visualized I'll tell you the power
29:33rule first then I'll prove it's true in
29:35a few minutes the power rule is applied
29:38the powers of X like X2 X cubed x 4th
29:43and so on it says that the derivative of
29:46x the N is n * X
29:49nus1 it looks horrible but every
29:52calculus student in history just
29:54remembers this about the power rule
29:56bring the exponent downstairs
29:58and subtract one so to find the
30:01derivative of x cubed we take the
30:03exponent 3 and bring it downstairs in
30:06front of X then we subtract one from the
30:09exponent and get 3 x^2 can you see how
30:12that matches the power rule
30:15shortcut what's the derivative of
30:18X2 well we bring the two downstairs to
30:21get 2x to the something for the exponent
30:24we subtract one from the original
30:26exponent two 2 - 1 is 1 and X to ^ of 1
30:31is just X so the derivative of x^2 is
30:362x can you see on your own that the
30:38derivative of x
30:404th is 4X cubed yes the power rule is
30:45pretty easy I'm arranging the exponents
30:48in numerical order so let's go back up
30:50top for the derivative of x to the first
30:53Power bring the one downstairs and the
30:56exponent becomes zero since x to the 0
30:59is 1 the derivative is 1 * 1 which is 1
31:03so the derivative of x is 1 this one's
31:07easy to see on a graph the line
31:09representing yal X is a straight line
31:12whose slope is obviously 1 it all works
31:14out let me scooch over here to get more
31:17room I'll sketch in x to the 0o and x to
31:20the first power so you can see that the
31:22pattern is kept and speaking of pattern
31:25let's go up top again to find the
31:26derivative of x to the 0 the 0er comes
31:29downstairs and the exponent becomes -1
31:33well 0 * anything is 0o so the
31:35derivative is zero and let's notice that
31:38x to the 0 power is 1 so this is a
31:41special case of the constant rule which
31:43says that the derivative of any constant
31:46such as one is zero so the power rule
31:49and constant rule give us the same
31:51derivative for exponent zero pretty neat
31:53it all works together and the rules are
31:56consistent how about this one what's the
31:59derivative of the square < TK of X well
32:02remember that the < TK of X is X raised
32:04to the2 power the power rule isn't
32:07limited to integer exponents we bring
32:10the 1/2 downstairs and subtract one from
32:131/2 to get an exponent of
32:15-2 since x^ -2 is 1 / < TK X this gives
32:21us 12 * 1 the < TK X or 1 / 2 < TK X the
32:28fraction has a radical in the
32:30denominator so we can rationalize by
32:32multiplying the numerator and
32:33denominator by squ < TK of x to get < TK
32:37X over 2X and that's the derivative of
32:40the squ < TK of X using the power rule
32:42which works for all real exponents not
32:45just
32:46integers well I've told you the power
32:48rule but I haven't proven that it's true
32:50now I'll prove it with limits let's take
32:53the derivative of x to the n as the
32:55limit of Delta y over Delta X like this
32:58as H approaches zero just like before we
33:01have our green and red y values the most
33:05tedious part of this proof is expanding
33:07the green binomial in this video's
33:10description I put some links to videos
33:12that go into more detail on the binomial
33:15expansion in short when the green x + H
33:18to the N is expanded the first green
33:21term will always be x to the n and the
33:24last green term will always be H to the
33:26N then moving towards the middle the
33:29second term is X to the n minus1 and H
33:32to the 1st prefixed with the binomial
33:34coefficient which for the second term is
33:36always n none of the other coefficients
33:39are important for this proof but it's
33:41interesting how the coefficients of each
33:43green term follow a pattern revealed by
33:46Pascal's triangle but that's not what
33:48this video is about so see the links in
33:49the description for more information
33:52math is so interesting and easy when you
33:54can see how it all fits together the
33:57second to last screen term will always
33:59have X and H to the N minus1 along with
34:02the binomial coefficient which is also n
34:05for the second to last term all the
34:08terms in the middle denoted by The
34:09Orange Box are the remaining binomial
34:12expansion terms and will have factors of
34:14H to a power of two or greater that will
34:17be important for our proof in a moment
34:20in fact all the green terms except the
34:22first two will have H factors raised to
34:25a power of two or more and there're
34:27still still the Red X to the end term we
34:29subtract at the end let's bring
34:32everything down and encapsulate the
34:34orange we'll always have positive and
34:36negative x to the N so they'll cancel
34:39every time every remaining term will
34:42always have at least one H since the
34:45denominator is H we can cancel an H from
34:48each remaining term this leaves n * x n
34:53-1 plus the orange terms which initially
34:56all had factors of h^2 or higher and now
35:00since we divided three by H they all
35:03have factors of H or higher when we take
35:06the limit as H approaches Z all of these
35:08terms approach zero and we're left with
35:11n * x n -1 and so we've proven the power
35:17rule once more the rule comes from the
35:20slope expression and is the pattern we
35:22notice every time we take the limit so
35:24when we do calculus we don't need to
35:27take the limit we just use the pattern
35:29and the pattern for the derivative of x
35:32the N is n * X
Visual interpretation of the power rule
35:36nus1 let me show you a visual
35:38interpretation of the power rule that
35:41should build your intuition the power
35:43rule tells us that the derivative of x^2
35:46is 2x let's consider the function x^2 to
35:49be the area a of an actual square with
35:53sides of length x the derivative of X2
35:56with respect to X X is the amount the
35:59area changes per change in X so if we
36:02let X Change by this differential amount
36:05DX by how much does the area of the
36:08square change well it changes by the
36:11area of these two narrow
36:13strips this one has an area of its
36:16height x * its width DX so X
36:21DX this one on top also has an area of
36:24its height DX times its width X so its
36:29area is also
36:31xdx for the sake of completeness let me
36:34point out this tiny corner piece whose
36:36area is dx^ s it's one of the orange
36:39terms from the binomial expansion that
36:41goes to zero as Delta X approaches zero
36:45so at the limit as Delta X approaches
36:47zero the change in the blue squares area
36:50the differential of a is the
36:52differential of our function x^2 this is
36:55the added area to X DX so the derivative
37:00of x^2 the change in x^2 per change in X
37:04is indeed
37:062x let's look at the derivative of x
37:09cubed visually the power rule tells us
37:12that its derivative is
37:143x^2 let's visualize the function X
37:17cubed as the volume of an actual Cube
37:19whose sides have length x when we
37:22increase X by the tiny differential DX
37:26what happens to the volume of the the
37:28cube when we add DX over here we get
37:31this new volume a thin slab on this face
37:34his volume is the area of the face X2
37:38time its thickness DX so the additional
37:42volume is x s DX you might see where
37:45we're going we get the same additional
37:48volume on these other two faces for a
37:50total of three x^2
37:53DX because I've drawn DX with some
37:56visible thickness you might know notice
37:57these three thin regions having volume X
38:00their length time dx^ 2 their
38:03cross-sectional area so the added volume
38:06is 3 x dx^ 2 this last tiny volume has
38:11sides equal to DX so its volume is DX
38:14cubed these orange terms all go to zero
38:17at the limit but it's interesting to see
38:20that even they have a visual
38:21interpretation on the
38:23diagram so the differential change in
38:25the volume X cubed is 3 x^2 DX this
38:30means the derivative of x cubed is the
38:32change in X cubed per change in X which
38:35is indeed 3x^2 as the power rule tells
38:38us to illustrate the usefulness of the
38:41power rule consider finding the
38:43derivative of x to the 4th with
38:49limits as you can see the power rule is
38:52so much simpler and always gives the
38:54same answer once more when we do
38:56calculus we use these shortcut rules we
38:59don't take limits in a calculus course
39:02or textbook you'll take limits only for
39:04the first week or two to demonstrate
39:06what the derivative means but once you
39:08learn the rules of differentiation
39:10you'll use them and you won't find
39:12limits anymore but I will still find
39:15limits in this video to prove the rules
39:17and illustrate some
The addition (and subtraction) rule of differentiation
39:19points now we'll go over ways to take
39:22the derivative of combinations of
39:24functions the first is the addition rule
39:27it says that the derivative of the sum
39:29of two functions is the sum of their
39:31distinct derivatives or in terms easy to
39:34remember the derivative of the sum is
39:37the sum of the
39:38derivatives here I'm using f and g as
39:41the two functions and the prime symbol
39:44to denote their derivatives an example
39:46should make this simple let's find the
39:48derivative of x^2 + x first the
39:52derivative of x^2 is 2X and the
39:55derivative of x is is 1 so the
39:59derivative of x^2 + x is 2x + 1 the
40:03derivative of the sum equals the sum of
40:06the
40:08derivatives let's look at the graph and
40:10see why this makes sense here are the
40:12two functions we're adding y = x^2 in
40:15white and Y = X in green and the blue
40:19curve is their sum y = x^2 + x let's
40:24take two nearby X values and look look
40:27at the corresponding Delta Y's for the
40:29three
40:30curves here's Delta y for white the
40:33change in X2 over our small Delta X and
40:36here's Delta y for green the change in
40:39green y over our small Delta X and
40:42finally here's Delta y for blue the
40:44change in x^2 + x over our small Delta X
40:49can you see that since blue equals y
40:51plus green that Delta y for blue equals
40:54the sum of the white and green Delta y's
40:57since blue equals white plus green
40:59everywhere any difference in blue must
41:02be equal to the corresponding difference
41:04in white plus green remember as Delta X
41:07approaches zero we use the word
41:09differential to describe the changes so
41:11the differential of the sum equals the
41:13sum of the differentials and that's the
41:16addition rule without elaboration I'll
41:18assert that the same relationship holds
41:20with subtraction that the derivative of
41:23the difference between two functions
41:25equals the difference of their
41:26respective derivatives so I'll write the
41:29addition rule with plus or minus since
41:31it works for addition and
41:33subtraction next is the product or
The product rule of differentiation
41:36multiplication rule it says the
41:38derivative of the product of two
41:40functions is the first function times
41:42the derivative of the second plus the
41:44second times the derivative of the
41:47first so the pattern is different than
41:50the addition rule because the derivative
41:52of the product is not the product of the
41:55derivatives like we did for the the
41:57power rule let's visualize the product
41:59rule by considering the product of the
42:01two functions to be a rectangle whose
42:03area is the product f *
42:06G on this graph the axes represent the
42:09values of the functions not the
42:11independent variable X at least not
42:14directly when we increment X by its
42:16differential DX F ofx increases by its
42:20own derivative DF by DX and the area of
42:23the rectangle increases slightly by this
42:26thin strip
42:27at the same time G ofx increases by its
42:30own different derivative DG by DX and
42:33the area of the rectangle increases
42:35slightly by this thin
42:37strip the area of this first strip is
42:40its height G of x times its width DF by
42:45DX and the area of the second strip is
42:48its height DG by DX times its width F
42:52ofx so the derivative of the product of
42:55the two functions is the addition area
42:58of the two rectangular strips and their
43:00dimensions are each function times the
43:03derivative of the other and that's a
43:05nice visual interpretation of the
43:07product
Combining rules of differentiation to find the derivative of a polynomial
43:09rule now we can look back at our sample
43:12function x^2 - 2x + 1 and consider which
43:16of these rules we'll need to use to find
43:18its
43:18derivative well it's the sum of three
43:21simpler functions so let's start with
43:23the addition rule the derivative of x^2
43:26is 2X X by the power rule for the next
43:29term we need to subtract the derivative
43:31of 2x which is the product of 2 and X so
43:35we'll need the product rule we'll get
43:37back to it in a second and the
43:39derivative of one is zero by the
43:41constant rule interesting to take the
43:43derivative of a simple polinomial we
43:46need all four of the rules we've covered
43:48so far now let's use the product rule to
43:51find the derivative of 2x the product
43:54rule says that the derivative of the
43:55product is the first function times the
43:58derivative of the second plus the second
44:00function times the derivative of the
44:02first the first function is two and the
44:05second function is X the derivative of
44:082x is 2 * the derivative of X Plus x *
44:12the derivative of two the derivative of
44:15x with respect to X is 1 by the power
44:18rule so the first term becomes 2 * 1 the
44:22derivative of two a constant is zero so
44:25the second term becomes x * 0 this all
44:28simplifies to two so the derivative of
44:312x is 2 which makes the derivative of
44:34our original function x^2 - 2x + 1 = 2x
44:39- 2 of course this is the same answer we
44:43got when we took the limit well this is
44:45the function I promised you'd be able to
44:47differentiate in a few seconds but using
44:50these four rules certainly took more
44:51than a few seconds let me show you a
Differentiation super-shortcuts for polynomials
44:54calculus super shortcut based on the
44:56product rule the derivative of any
45:00constant K * x with respect to X is
45:03simply the constant K because when we
45:05use the product rule we get K * the
45:08derivative of x + x * the derivative of
45:11K the derivative of x with respect to X
45:15is always one so the first term will
45:17always be K and the derivative of K with
45:20respect to X is always Zero by the
45:23constant rule so the second term will
45:25always be zero this pattern occurs every
45:28time the product rule is applied to KX
45:31so the derivative of any constant K * X
45:35is always
45:36K this is the kind of pattern the rules
45:39of differentiation let us exploit now
45:42let's go back and find the derivative of
45:44x^2 - 2x + 1 at x = 1.6 by
45:48differentiating left to right 2x - 2
45:53with practice you learn to ignore
45:55constants plug Again The Chosen x value
45:58of 1.6 to get 3.2 minus 2 so 1.2 and
46:04that's how with practice you can know
46:07almost immediately that the derivative
46:09or slope of x^2 - 2x + 1 at x = 1.6 is
46:171.2 okay now for another great shortcut
46:20which is a generalization of the first
46:22one for KX this time we'll take the
46:25derivative of KX to to the N so we have
46:28a power of X with some constant
46:31coefficient K so this is the product of
46:34two functions K and x to the N let's use
46:38the product rule again and see where
46:40this leads us we have the first * the
46:43derivative of the second plus the second
46:45* the derivative of the first the
46:48derivative of x to the N is straight
46:50from the power rule n * X nus1 and the
46:54derivative of constant K is a of course
46:57zero so the second term becomes zero
47:00this leaves the derivative as K * n x
47:04nus1 at first this new shortcut looks a
47:07little cumbersome like the power rule
47:09did but look at What it lets us do when
47:12we bring the exponent downstairs we can
47:14just multiply it by whatever coefficient
47:16is already there so the derivative of 4X
47:20cubed is 12 x^2 we bring the three down
47:24stairs multiply it by the co efficient
47:27of four that's already there to get 12
47:30and then we subtract one from the
47:31exponent this simple super shortcut has
47:34the product rule power rule and constant
47:37rule built in it automatically follows
47:40all the rules so knowing this super
47:43shortcut and using the addition rule we
47:46can easily take the derivative of long
47:48polom we just work left to right
47:51differentiating one term at a time pols
47:54are incredibly simple to
47:58differentiate I need to finish the rules
48:00of differentiation but first we actually
Solving optimization problems with derivatives
48:03know enough calculus to solve some
48:05interesting problems known as
48:07optimization problems they involve
48:09finding the local minimum and maximum
48:12values for a function for example
48:14suppose this curve represents the net
48:17profit our company would make by
48:19manufacturing and selling X number of a
48:21particular item if we make and sell too
48:24few our profit will be limited by the
48:26low number if we make and sell too many
48:29our supply might exceed the demand and
48:31our extra cost for running more machines
48:34and hiring more people won't be offset
48:36by the higher volume there's some
48:38independent variable here that will
48:40maximize the profit function how do we
48:43find it let's notice that at the maximum
48:46the slope of the function is zero lucky
48:49for us we know calculus we can take the
48:51derivative of the profit function and
48:54find the equation for its slope anywhere
48:57when we set the derivative function
48:59equal to zero we can solve for x to get
49:02the exact point at which the original
49:04function is at its
49:05maximum our profit function f ofx in
49:08thousands of dollars is
49:120.012 x^2 + 9.8 x
49:17-500 where X is the number of units we
49:19manufacture and sell to find the value
49:22for x that maximizes the function we
49:25take the derivative of the function
49:26function and set it equal to Z and solve
49:29for x we know how to take the derivative
49:32of polom we have
49:340.024 x +
49:379.8 set this equal to zero and solve x =
49:4348.3 so we should make 408 units to
49:46maximize our profit if your problem
49:48statement asks you for the profit amount
49:51plug 48 into the original profit
49:53function to get the maximum profit
49:55amount F of 48 equals
49:595.8 and we're told this is in thousands
50:02of dollars so the maximum profit is
50:06$5,800 when we make and sell 48
50:10units let's do another problem suppose
50:13we have a rectangular sheet of metal
50:15that measures 32 CM by 24 cm we want to
50:19make a box by cutting squares out of the
50:22corners and folding the resulting sides
50:24up the box won't have a lid
50:27the shapes we cut out of the corners
50:29need to be squares so that when we fold
50:31the sides up they'll all have the same
50:33height what are the dimensions of the
50:35Box having the greatest volume and what
50:38is the
50:39volume okay we need to express the
50:41volume v as some function of a variable
50:44let's use the length of the square sides
50:46that we cut out of the corners and call
50:48it X of course all of these distances
50:51are X the volume of the Box will be its
50:55width times its depth times its height
50:58the width is this distance which in
51:00centim is 32 minus
51:032x the depth is 24 -
51:082x so when we multiply these Expressions
51:11that gives us 4X cubed - 112 x^2 + 768 x
51:18I'm skimming over the algebra so we can
51:19focus on the calculus to find the x
51:22value that maximizes this function we'll
51:24take the derivative set it equal to 0
51:27and solve for x the derivative of the
51:30polom is 12 x^2 -
51:34224x +
51:37768 this is a quadratic equation and
51:39there are several ways to solve it I
51:42used but won't show the quadratic
51:44formula to get two possible solutions X
51:47= 14.1 cm and X = 4.53 CM we need to
51:53check these numbers for feasibility the
51:55short side of the metal sheet is 24 cm
51:59so we can't cut out squares greater than
52:0112 CM there's not enough metal on that
52:03edge so that leaves 4.53 CM as our
52:06answer for X but that's not the answer
52:10to our problem we're asked for the
52:11dimensions that maximize the Box's
52:13volume and for that maximum volume so we
52:17plug in 4.53 cm for X into our width and
52:21depth formulas we get a width of 22.9 4
52:25cm and the depth depth of
52:3214.94%
52:34so multiplying these Dimensions yields a
52:37volume of
52:381,552 cubic cm any other value for the
52:42square size X will result in a lower
The second derivative
52:46volume let's look at a different
52:48function this curve has two points where
52:51the slope is zero a local maximum here
52:54and a local minimum here when we use the
52:57word local to describe a minimum or
52:59maximum we mean compared to the points
53:01nearby for example the local maximum
53:04identified here isn't the function's
53:07maximum it has higher values out to the
53:09right and similarly there are lower
53:12values closer to the y- axis than the
53:14local minimum identified Here Local
53:17means higher or lower than nearby points
53:19on either side anyway when we set the
53:23derivative equal to zero and solve for x
53:25we get these values but it's important
53:28to be able to tell the difference
53:29between a minimum and a maximum if our
53:32management team wanted to maximize
53:34profits and we recommended action
53:36corresponding to this point that could
53:38be a disaster or if they wanted to
53:40minimize budget or time and we chose
53:43this point setting the derivative equal
53:45to zero and solving for x will give us
53:47the points where the slope is zero which
53:49could be a local maximum or minimum but
53:52how can we know
53:54which let's color code the function
53:56slope green for positive here to the
53:59left of the first zero point the slope
54:01is zero at the maximum of course and
54:04then negative red between the two zero
54:06points then the slope is zero again at
54:09the minimum and positive beyond the
54:11second zero point so the slope changes
54:14signs at the Minima and Maxima this
54:17makes sense if it's zero at a point it
54:19must be passing from positive to
54:21negative or from negative to positive
54:25but notice that at the maximum point the
54:27slope is changing from positive to
54:29negative and at the minimum point the
54:31slope is changing from negative to
54:33positive let's plot the function's
54:37derivative of course it's zero at the
54:39two points where the function slope is
54:41zero at the local Maxima the slope of
54:44the pink derivative will always be
54:46changing from positive to negative which
54:49means its slope is negative as you can
54:51see here and at local Minima the slope
54:54of the pink derivative will always be
54:56changing from negative to positive which
54:59means its slope is positive as you can
55:01see here the slope of the derivative is
55:04positive at locom Minima so what do we
55:07mean by the slope of the derivative
55:09remember in calculus we're just
55:11performing operations on functions that
55:13result in different functions when we
55:16differentiate a function f ofx to get
55:18its derivative fime of x frime of X is
55:22just a new function that we can in turn
55:24differentiate to get it derivative the
55:27derivative of a derivative is called the
55:30second derivative or depending on the
55:32variables the second derivative of y
55:35with respect to
55:36X I'll show more notation in a moment
55:39but F Prime of X is a common way to
55:42denote the second derivative the second
55:45derivative of a function tells us the
55:46rate of change of the slope of that
55:49function and as you might guess the
55:51derivative of the original function is
55:53called the first
55:55derivative here here are six examples of
55:57Curves from various functions f ofx for
56:01this first one the slope frime of X is
56:04positive since the function's value is
56:06increasing and since the rate of change
56:08of the increase is not changing that is
56:11it's a steady increase the second
56:13derivative is
56:15zero in this example the first
56:18derivative fime of x is again positive
56:21since the function value is increasing
56:24and since the rate of increase is itself
56:26increasing the second derivative is also
56:30positive in this example the slope is
56:33increasing but it's changing from a
56:35steep High slope to a shallow low slope
56:38so the second derivative is negative can
56:41you see how these two functions have
56:43different behaviors even though they
56:45both have a positive slope for one the
56:48slope is increasing at an increasing
56:50rate for the other the slope is
56:52increasing but at a decreasing rate
56:57down here the slope frime of X is
57:00negative and since the slope is constant
57:02the second derivative is
57:04zero this function has a negative slope
57:07but the slope is getting less and less
57:09negative so the second derivative is
57:11increasing
57:13positive and this last curve also has a
57:16negative slope and its slope is getting
57:18more and more negative so the second
57:20derivative is decreasing
57:23negative since the first derivative can
57:25be thought of is the rate of change the
57:27second derivative is essentially the
57:29rate of change of the rate of change the
57:32second derivative is useful because it
57:34helps describe the behavior of functions
57:37and it's especially useful in
57:39minimization and maximization problems
57:41to distinguish between local Minima and
57:44Maxima at points where frime of X is
57:47zero X represents a minimum point where
57:50the second derivative is positive and X
57:52represents a maximum point where the
57:54second derivative is negative
58:00now for some second derivative notation
58:02the derivative of the derivative is the
58:04second derivative fpre of x since the
58:08derivative is dy by DX we can write the
58:11second derivative as d by DX of Dy by DX
58:15let's move the function up to the
58:17numerator now what follows is symbolic
58:20shorthand not true algebra we take the d
58:23and Dy at the top and combine them to
58:26get d^2 y because there's two D's and
58:29one y and when we take the two DXs and
58:32combine them we get dx^ 2 so the
58:35symbolic representation of the second
58:37derivative of y with respect to X is d^2
58:41y by DX squared I'm not saying it makes
58:44pure algebraic sense maybe a
58:46mathematician can tell us in the
58:48comments if there's a deeper meaning
58:49behind the symbol I'm just an engineer
58:52and I don't
58:53know there are higher order derivatives
58:55of course of course the derivative of a
58:57function second derivative is the
58:59function's third derivative it's easy to
59:01extend the D by DX pattern to see third
59:04derivative as D cubed y by DX cubed fle
59:09Prime is another representation of the
59:11third
59:12derivative please don't think that
59:14higher order derivatives are any more
59:17difficult or complicated than the first
59:18derivative it's the same differentiation
59:21operation following the same rules of
59:24differentiation well let's get back to
59:26the remaining rules of differentiation
59:29but first let's check our progress we've
59:31covered four important rules of
59:34differentiation the constant rule the
59:36power rule the addition subtraction Rule
59:39and the product rule then we covered
59:41some super shortcuts involving polom
59:44solved two problems and learned about
59:47the second and higher order derivatives
59:50now we'll cover the last five rules of
59:52differentiation in this order
59:57first s and
Trig rules of differentiation (for sine and cosine)
59:59cosine here's a sine wave the plot of y
1:00:02equal s of theta you don't need to be an
1:00:05expert at trigonometry to differentiate
1:00:07s and cosine but if anything I'm about
1:00:10to say seems unfamiliar I have a YouTube
1:00:12trigonometry course if you want to brush
1:00:14up Linked In the
1:00:16description let's draw the sign
1:00:18function's derivative by plotting a few
1:00:20points and seeing what patterns arise
1:00:23we'll start with a local Minima and
1:00:24Maxima there always easy to see so the
1:00:27derivative will be zero and intersect
1:00:30the Theta axis at these blue
1:00:33points at these points where the sine
1:00:35wave crosses the Theta axis in an
1:00:37upwards Direction the slope is one using
1:00:41the expression for the slope again let
1:00:43me demonstrate quickly and without
1:00:45elaboration that Delta y over Delta
1:00:47Theta we've made Theta our independent
1:00:50variable not X is very close to one when
1:00:53Green Delta Theta is very close to zero
1:00:58the slope at these points is one so
1:01:00we'll plot the blue derivative points
1:01:02here at y equal 1 the y-coordinate of
1:01:06each Blue Point represents the slope of
1:01:08the red sign curve at that value of
1:01:11theta the slope at these points is -1 so
1:01:15the Blue Points go down here we could
1:01:18plot more points but let me jump to the
1:01:20answer and plot the derivative of sin
1:01:22Theta it's this smooth curve
1:01:26if you're familiar with trigonometry
1:01:28you'll recognize this curve as cosine
1:01:30Theta the derivative of sin Theta is
1:01:33cosine Theta pretty neat let me show you
1:01:37a proof it assumes a little trigonometry
1:01:39knowledge but I'll go quickly we'll
1:01:41consider a unit circle and focus on the
1:01:44first quadrant let's put angle Theta in
1:01:46standard position since we're on the
1:01:48unit circle this yellow length the
1:01:51radius of the circle is one this
1:01:53horizontal length is cine Theta and this
1:01:56vertical length is sin Theta it's this
1:01:59vertical red length we're interested in
1:02:01as Theta changes ever so slightly by D
1:02:04Theta what's the change to the red
1:02:06length D sin Theta let's find
1:02:09out the pink Arc has length Theta which
1:02:12seems strange because green Theta
1:02:15represents an angle the number of
1:02:16radians and pink Theta represents a
1:02:19distance the number of radi but since
1:02:22the radius of the circle is one the
1:02:24numbers for Theta green GRE and pink are
1:02:27the same let's see what happens near
1:02:29this point and note that this segment of
1:02:31the circle circumference is very nearly
1:02:33a straight line as our focus of
1:02:35attention get smaller and
1:02:37smaller the derivative of sin Theta is
1:02:40how much this vertical distance changes
1:02:42as Theta changes by the tiny
1:02:44differential of theta D Theta and since
1:02:47pink Theta and green Theta have the same
1:02:50measurement I'm going to make the D
1:02:51Theta label green to match our formula
1:02:54to find the change sin Theta let's draw
1:02:57this right triangle and we can see that
1:02:59red Sin Theta changes by this amount
1:03:02that we can call D sin Theta so in this
1:03:05small triangle we have representations
1:03:07for D sin Theta and D Theta which are
1:03:10the numerator and denominator of the
1:03:12derivative we're trying to find since
1:03:15the trig ratios are the ratios between
1:03:17the various sides of a right triangle
1:03:19our derivative ratio is one of the six
1:03:21trig functions this angle is congruent
1:03:24to Theta I'm telling you this without
1:03:26proof and so D sin Theta and D Theta are
1:03:29the adjacent and hypotenuse of the small
1:03:32triangle respectively and adjacent over
1:03:34hypotenuse corresponds to cosine and so
1:03:37we've shown graphically that the
1:03:39derivative of s is cosine be careful
1:03:43because the opposite is not true the
1:03:45derivative of cosine is not s since the
1:03:48blue cosine curve has the exact same
1:03:51shape as the sign curve it seems
1:03:53reasonable to deduce that the derivative
1:03:55of cosine will also have this shape and
1:03:58let's note that the cosine is out of
1:04:00phase with s to illustrate I'll add
1:04:03Theta axis markers at every pi/ 2
1:04:06radians and we can see that the cosine
1:04:08curve the derivative of s is always pi
1:04:11over two radians to the left of s this
1:04:14is easiest to see by comparing peak-to
1:04:17Peak points where the functions have
1:04:18their maximum
1:04:20values since the derivative of s is out
1:04:23of phase to it by Pi / 2 does it it make
1:04:26sense that the derivative of cosine
1:04:28would be out of phase to it well yes
1:04:30indeed it actually is but as you can see
1:04:33we don't have a function with these Peak
1:04:35values but if we flip the sign curve by
1:04:38taking its negative we get the curve we
1:04:40seek and the derivative of cosine Theta
1:04:44is indeed negative sin
1:04:46Theta so it's the derivative of negative
1:04:49sin Theta but looking at the curve you
1:04:51may see what's coming next the
1:04:53derivative of negative sin Theta is
1:04:56cosine Theta and taking the derivative
1:04:59of cosine Theta gets us back to sin
1:05:02Theta and this four-step cycle comprises
1:05:05the trig related rules of
1:05:08differentiation it might help to
1:05:09remember that the trig functions
1:05:11alternate that is taking the derivative
1:05:13of a sign yields a cosine and vice versa
1:05:17then it's easy to remember that the
1:05:19derivative of s keeps the sign so the
1:05:22derivative of positive sign is positive
1:05:24cosine keep the S and the derivative of
1:05:27negative sin Theta is negative cosine
1:05:30Theta the derivative of s keeps the S on
1:05:34the other hand the derivative of a
1:05:35cosine function flips the sign the
1:05:38derivative of positive cosine Theta is
1:05:41negative sin Theta and the derivative of
1:05:43negative cosine Theta is positive sin
1:05:47Theta as you may know there are four
1:05:49more trig functions but we'll have to
1:05:51skip them for now and cover their
1:05:53derivatives later let's test our
Knowledge test: product rule example
1:05:56knowledge what's the derivative of x Cub
1:05:58* sin x well we have the product of two
1:06:02differentiable functions we can call f
1:06:05and g so we'll use the product
1:06:08rule the derivative of the product
1:06:10equals the first times the derivative of
1:06:12the second plus the second * the
1:06:15derivative of the first so it's simple
1:06:18there's really no intermediary steps
1:06:20just write down the components and
1:06:22that's the derivative of the product X
1:06:25cubed cine x + sin x *
1:06:313x^2 now for the chain
The chain rule for differentiation (composite functions)
1:06:35Ru the chain rule is how we
1:06:37differentiate composite functions a
1:06:40composite function is a function whose
1:06:42argument includes another function you
1:06:45can think of composite functions as
1:06:47embedded functions where one function is
1:06:49embedded in the other for example sin 2x
1:06:54is a composite function because s is a
1:06:56function and its argument 2x is another
1:07:00function the 2x function is embedded in
1:07:03the sign function as its argument this
1:07:06is very common in math science and
1:07:08engineering so you'll use the chain rule
1:07:10a lot probably more than any other
1:07:13rule let's see why we need the chain
1:07:16rule when we find the derivative of sin
1:07:182x first we know the derivative of sin x
1:07:21with respect to X is cosine X it's true
1:07:25it's one of of our rules of
1:07:26differentiation the one we just covered
1:07:29but we cannot say that the derivative of
1:07:31sin 2x with respect to X is cosine 2X
1:07:35that's false it's close we'll need to
1:07:38adjust a bit with the chain rule to get
1:07:40the derivative of sin 2x but this isn't
1:07:43right here's the pattern the derivative
1:07:46of s something with respect to that
1:07:48something equals cosine of that
1:07:50something all three terms need to match
1:07:53for the differentiation rule to apply
1:07:56and when we try to apply the rule to sin
1:07:582x you can see that they don't match I'm
1:08:01illustrating this with the trig rule but
1:08:04the pattern applies to all the
1:08:06rules if we were to modify the equation
1:08:09to be the derivative of sin 2x with
1:08:11respect to 2x then the derivative would
1:08:14be cosine 2X because all the terms would
1:08:18match but in calculus were not asked
1:08:20very often to find the derivative with
1:08:22respect to a function of X just with
1:08:25respect to X so we need to dig a Little
1:08:28Deeper to differentiate composite
1:08:30functions we can write composite
1:08:32functions like this F of G of x g is
1:08:37called the inner function because it's
1:08:39inside the argument for function f which
1:08:41is the outer function the derivative
1:08:44we're seeking is DF by DX the derivative
1:08:47of the outer function with respect to
1:08:50the argument of the inner function our
1:08:52independent variable X here's the key to
1:08:55to understanding the chain rule a
1:08:57differential change in X will result in
1:09:00a differential change to G DG by
1:09:04DX that differential change to G in turn
1:09:07causes a differential change to F DF by
1:09:12DG and that change to function f DF that
1:09:15occurs as a result of the differential
1:09:17change to X DX is the derivative we want
1:09:21DF by
1:09:23DX this is where the chain rule gets its
1:09:26name the differential change to X
1:09:29ripples out in a chain reaction to cause
1:09:31the differential change in the outermost
1:09:34function here's the chain rule for
1:09:36differentiation the derivative of f of g
1:09:39ofx equals the derivative of f with
1:09:42respect to G times the derivative of G
1:09:45with respect to X it should look
1:09:47familiar it's the Chain Reaction we just
1:09:50traced from the independent variable X
1:09:52Out to the outermost function and it
1:09:55makes sense algebraically because
1:09:57there's a clear cancellation chain that
1:09:59makes the chain rule a lot easier to
1:10:01visualize and
1:10:03understand so let's find the derivative
1:10:06of sin 2x for the first Factor DF by DG
1:10:10we need the derivative of the outer sin
1:10:132x with respect to the inner 2x let's
1:10:16notice that these terms match you'll
1:10:19always get a match like this when you
1:10:20use the chain rule we can use the trig
1:10:23rule that the derivative is cosine of
1:10:25the matching term so DF by DG equal
1:10:28cosine 2X by the way this is the answer
1:10:32we said was not right a moment ago to
1:10:34get the correct answer we need to
1:10:35multiply by the last term DG by DX G is
1:10:402x so we get the derivative of 2x with
1:10:43respect to X it doesn't get much easier
1:10:46than this we have a super shortcut that
1:10:48tells us the derivative of 2x with
1:10:50respect to X is 2 so we use the chain
1:10:53rule to determine that the D derivative
1:10:55of sin 2x is 2 cosine
1:10:592X let's do another problem and find the
1:11:02derivative of the sare < TK of 5x^2 +
1:11:063 the inner function is 5x^2 + 3 the
1:11:10outer function is the square root let's
1:11:13rewrite the expression using an exponent
1:11:15of 1/2 to represent the square root this
1:11:18should make it clear which function is
1:11:20the inner function and which is the
1:11:23outer the first Factor we need to find
1:11:25find is DF by DG the derivative of the
1:11:28outer function with respect to the inner
1:11:30the outer function is 5x^2 + 3 to the 1/
1:11:3412 the inner function is 5x^2 + 3 when
1:11:38you use the chain rule you'll always
1:11:40have matching terms and can use the
1:11:42appropriate rule of
1:11:44differentiation in this case the power
1:11:46rule with exponent
1:11:481/2 with the power rule we bring the
1:11:51exponent downstairs and subtract one
1:11:53from it we get 1/2 times the matching
1:11:56expression which turns out to be the
1:11:58inner function G raised to the -2 and
1:12:02that's the first term in the chain rule
1:12:04DF by DG the second Factor DG by DX is
1:12:09simple too it's the derivative with
1:12:11respect to X of 5x^2 + 3 we use the
1:12:15power rule again for this one 10 x you
1:12:19can simplify the expression using
1:12:21algebra and we found the derivative of
1:12:23this composite function
1:12:26let's do one more chain rule example
1:12:28this time with a composite of three
1:12:30functions so we want to find the
1:12:32derivative of f of G of H of X let's set
1:12:37up the chain the derivative of f with
1:12:40respect to G times the derivative of G
1:12:43with respect to H times the derivative
1:12:45of H with respect to x three functions
1:12:48makes the chain concept even more
1:12:51obvious algebraically the dgs cancel and
1:12:54the DH is cancel leaving us with DF by
1:12:57DX the derivative of the outermost
1:13:00function with respect to the independent
1:13:02variable
1:13:03X so let's find the derivative with
1:13:06respect to X of cine 2 4X let's rewrite
1:13:10the function as cosine of 4x^ squared
1:13:13because cosine squar argument means the
1:13:16cosine of the argument
1:13:18squared the inner function is 4X the
1:13:21middle function is cosine and the outer
1:13:24function is power of two let me expand
1:13:27the derivative chain and show you again
1:13:29how simple this
1:13:32is the chain always starts with the
1:13:35differential of the given outermost
1:13:37function as the numerator of the first
1:13:39factor for this problem the given
1:13:42function is cine of 4x^ 2 so D cosine
1:13:474x^
1:13:48SAR the denominator of the first factor
1:13:51is DG the differential of the middle
1:13:54function which is cosine so D cosine
1:13:57forx as usual when we use the chain rule
1:14:01we have matching terms and the
1:14:03derivative with respect to something of
1:14:04something squared is two of that
1:14:06something so the first term in the chain
1:14:09DF by DG is 2 cosine
1:14:124X the numerator of the second factor is
1:14:15the denominator of the first that's how
1:14:18the chain Works D cosine 4X the
1:14:21denominator of the second factor is DH
1:14:24the differential of the inner function
1:14:26which is 4X so
1:14:29d4x again our terms match and we have
1:14:31the derivative of cosine of something
1:14:34with respect to that something the
1:14:36something is 4X and the derivative of
1:14:38cosine is negative s so the second term
1:14:41DG by DH is NE sin
1:14:454X following the pattern the numerator
1:14:48of the third factor is the denominator
1:14:50of the second differential of
1:14:524X and finally at the end of the chain
1:14:55is the differential of the independent
1:14:57variable X DX the last Factor will be a
1:15:00straightforward derivative the
1:15:02derivative of 4X with respect to X is 4
1:15:05so the last Factor DH by DX is
1:15:094 rearrange the terms if you like and we
1:15:12found the derivative of cosine 2 4X and
1:15:15that's the chain rule the one you'll use
1:15:18most often in real life and very easy
1:15:20with
The quotient rule for differentiation
1:15:23practice next is the quo rule where
1:15:25we'll find the derivative of one
1:15:27function divided by another put
1:15:29differently we're finding how the ratio
1:15:31between two functions of X changes as X
1:15:34changes first the derivative of the
1:15:36ratio is not the ratio of the
1:15:39derivatives that might remind you of the
1:15:41product rule since the derivative of the
1:15:43product is not the product of the
1:15:45derivatives the quotient rule says that
1:15:47the derivative of the ratio is the
1:15:50denominator time the derivative of the
1:15:52numerator minus the numerator times the
1:15:55derivative of the
1:15:57denominator all over the denominator
1:16:00squared we can prove it's true using the
1:16:02product rule and chain rule first we
1:16:05rewrite the quotient as a product with a
1:16:08denominator raised to the -1 power so we
1:16:11have d by DX of f ofx * G ofx
1:16:16the1 so we use the product rule the
1:16:19first * the derivative of the second
1:16:21plus the second * the derivative of the
1:16:24first the derivative has four components
1:16:27each straightforward except this one is
1:16:29a composite of a function raised to a
1:16:31power so we'll just need to apply the
1:16:33chain rule we have the derivative of
1:16:36some function raised to the -1 so the
1:16:38power rule tells us that's -1 * the
1:16:41function raised to the -2 then to finish
1:16:44the chain rule we multiply by the
1:16:46derivative of the function G Prime of X
1:16:49now let's
1:16:52simplify on the left side we have f
1:16:55ofx * G Prime of
1:16:58X all over G of x^2 then we add the
1:17:03right
1:17:04side fime of
1:17:06X over G
1:17:08ofx so we're adding two fractions but
1:17:11their denominators don't match if the
1:17:14denominators matched we could add their
1:17:16numerators if we multiplied the right
1:17:18denominator by G of X then they'd both
1:17:21be g^ 2 of X so let's multiply the right
1:17:24term by G of X over G
1:17:28ofx and that's it if we swap the left
1:17:30and right terms the format will match
1:17:32the quotient rule stated above so we've
1:17:35derived the quotient rule from the
1:17:37product rule and chain
1:17:39rule to remember the chain rule I start
1:17:42with the denominator squared then the
1:17:44numerator expression starts with the
1:17:46denominator not squared then like the
1:17:49product rule we multiply one by the
1:17:52derivative of the other but unlike the
1:17:54product rule we subtract instead of add
1:17:57then the right term is opposite
1:17:59derivative Wise from the left term frime
1:18:02becomes f and g becomes G Prime write it
1:18:05from scratch a few times and you'll know
1:18:07it let's find the derivative of a
1:18:10quotient 3x Cub - x^2 + 2 / cosine
1:18:16X we'll start with the denominator squar
1:18:19cine 2qu of X then for the numerator
1:18:22expression we start with the denominator
1:18:24again not squared cine X then multiply
1:18:28by the derivative of the numerator by
1:18:30the power rule the derivative of 3 x Cub
1:18:33- x^2 + 1 is 9 x^2 -
1:18:382x then we subtract the right expression
1:18:41which is the numerator 3x Cub - x^2 + 1
1:18:46* the derivative of the denominator the
1:18:49derivative of cine X is sinx that's
1:18:53pretty much it these negative signs undo
1:18:55each other and with some trig
1:18:57substitution you can get rid of the
1:18:58cosine ^ 2qu x in the denominator and
1:19:01that's the quotient
The derivative of the other trig functions (tan, cot, sec, cos)
1:19:04rule speaking of trig now that we know
1:19:06the quotient rule we can find the
1:19:08derivative of the other four trig
1:19:10functions because they can all be
1:19:11expressed as fractions involving s and
1:19:14cosine I'm using the color coding from
1:19:17my trigonometry series just for this
1:19:19chart for the derivative of tangent
1:19:22Theta the quotient rule is the
1:19:23denominator time the derivative of the
1:19:25numerator minus the numerator * the
1:19:28derivative of the denominator all
1:19:30divided the denominator squared this
1:19:33simplifies to cosine 2 thet plus sin s
1:19:36Theta which is 1 over cosine s thet
1:19:40which is secant squ thet since secant is
1:19:431/
1:19:44cosine I'll show the derivation of the
1:19:46other trig functions using the quotient
1:19:48rule but won't step through the details
1:19:51you might need to know these check with
1:19:53your instructor if you know the quotient
1:19:55Rule and the circle trig identities you
1:19:57can figure these out as you need them
1:20:00practice builds confidence here are the
1:20:03derivatives of the six trig
1:20:08functions let's check our agenda we
1:20:11covered the four-part trig cycle for the
1:20:13derivatives of s and cosine we covered
1:20:17the chain rule to find the derivative of
1:20:19composite functions the role you're
1:20:21likely to use more than any other then
1:20:23we went over the quotient Rule and
1:20:25actually derived it from the product
1:20:27rule and the chain rule we use the
1:20:29quotient rule to show the derivatives of
1:20:31the remaining trig functions since
1:20:33they're all ratios that include s and
1:20:36cosine the last rules of differentiation
1:20:39are for exponentials and
1:20:41logarithms please note that all these
1:20:43Atomic function types can be combined
1:20:46and used in all of these rules that
1:20:48allow us to combine functions in various
1:20:51ways so the next rules are for
1:20:54exponential and
Algebra overview: exponentials and logarithms
1:20:57logarithms these rules are some of the
1:21:00simplest well they've all been pretty
1:21:01simple right but there's a lot of
1:21:03background to review for it all to make
1:21:05sense exponentials and logarithms are
1:21:08usually covered in Algebra 2 or
1:21:10pre-calculus but I'll do a thorough
1:21:12review of the topics needed to
1:21:14understand the rules of
1:21:16differentiation exponential functions
1:21:18have their independent variable X up in
1:21:21the exponent the number on bottom is
1:21:23called the base I'm color coding the
1:21:25base green as a reminder that it's not a
1:21:28variable like X it's a constant such as
1:21:312 don't confuse the exponential function
1:21:342 ra the power of X with the polom or
1:21:38power function x raed to the power of
1:21:40two they're different functions with
1:21:43different graphs and different
1:21:44derivatives you can remember that
1:21:46exponential functions have their
1:21:48variable in the
1:21:49exponent and in short B to the X means
1:21:53multiply con base B by itself x
1:21:58* let's assume we have B raised to the
1:22:017th power as shown the associative
1:22:03property of multiplication says that we
1:22:06can group The B's together like this and
1:22:08get the same result so B 7th = B 3r * B
1:22:144th in general when their bases are the
1:22:17same we can multiply exponentials by
1:22:21adding their exponents let's graph some
1:22:24exponential
1:22:25when the base B is greater than one the
1:22:27exponential function value gets bigger
1:22:29and bigger as X increases the slope is
1:22:32always positive functions like these are
1:22:35used to model exponential
1:22:37growth when the base B is one the
1:22:40exponential function value Y is always
1:22:43one because one to any exponent is one
1:22:46because 1 times itself any number of
1:22:48times is always going to be
1:22:51one and when the Bas is between zero and
1:22:54one the function value gets smaller and
1:22:56smaller as X increases functions like
1:22:59this are used to model exponential
1:23:02decay an exponential function with base
1:23:05B will always be symmetrical across the
1:23:07y AIS to an exponential function whose
1:23:10base is the reciprocal of B like this
1:23:13example of 2 and/
1:23:1612 all the graphs of y equal sum base B
1:23:19to the X pass through the very busy
1:23:22Point 0a 1 because any base B raised to
1:23:26the zeroth power will always equal
1:23:29one here's an animation showing various
1:23:32exponential curves as the green base B
1:23:34changes when B is greater than one the
1:23:37curve is always increasing the higher
1:23:40the base B the faster the increase and
1:23:43as I mentioned every curve passes
1:23:44through the circled point 0 comma
1:23:471 when base B is 1 the curve flattens
1:23:51out because 1 raised to any power x will
1:23:54always
1:23:55B1 and when B is between 0 and 1 the
1:23:58curve is always decreasing lower base
1:24:01values B decrease
1:24:03faster so we have an exponential
1:24:05function y = b to the X where B is a
1:24:08constant and X is the independent
1:24:10variable so given b x and a calculator
1:24:14we can find
1:24:16y but what if we know Y and B and want
1:24:19to find X for any function when we find
1:24:23x given y instead of Y given X that's
1:24:26called taking the inverse of the
1:24:28function suppose we knew Y =
1:24:315.89 and wanted to find X how would we
1:24:34do it the inverse of the exponential
1:24:37function is the logarithm the logarithm
1:24:40answers the question what's the exponent
1:24:43we write and say the logarithm function
1:24:46like this x = log base 1.47 3 of
1:24:515.89 it means X is the expon onent on
1:24:551.47 3 that results in
1:24:595.89 these equations aren't solved by
1:25:01hand we use a calculator and before
1:25:04calculators slide rules let me show you
1:25:07this again emphasizing the inverse
1:25:09relationship to solve this equation for
1:25:12x we need to isolate X to get x equals
1:25:15something but X is in the exponent how
1:25:18do we get x out of the exponent how do
1:25:21we undo
1:25:23exponentiation by taking the logarithm
1:25:26we'll take the logarithm of both sides
1:25:28making sure that the bases match to undo
1:25:31an exponent of Base 1.47 3 we need to
1:25:35take the logarithm base 1.47 3 let's
1:25:39look at the right side of the equation
1:25:41remember the log function answers the
1:25:43question what's the exponent let's
1:25:46transliterate the right hand side what's
1:25:48the exponent on 1.47 3 that results in
1:25:531.4 473 to the X well the answer is X
1:25:58this is rather like asking what's half
1:26:00of twice X the half and the twice undo
1:26:03each other leaving X and the logarithm
1:26:05base 1.47 3 undo exponentiation base
1:26:101.47 3 so we get X on the right hand
1:26:13side which is exactly why we took the
1:26:15logarithm to isolate the exponent x to
1:26:19keep things even and balanced we need to
1:26:21take the logarithm of the left side too
1:26:24and we get log base 1.47 3 of 5.89 which
1:26:29our calculator will tell us is
1:26:334.58 since exponentials and logarithms
1:26:35are inverse functions of each other
1:26:37their graphs are symmetrical across the
1:26:39line yal
1:26:41X the exponential of Base B is a miror
1:26:44reflection of the logarithm base B
1:26:47across the dotted diagonal line Y = X
1:26:51all inverse function pairs share this
1:26:53characteristic not just exponentials and
1:26:56logarithms so naturally since all
1:26:59exponential graphs pass through the
1:27:00point 0 comma 1 because any base raised
1:27:04to the 0 power is 1 all logarithmic
1:27:07graphs pass through the point 1 comma 0
1:27:10because the exponent to any base that
1:27:12results in one is
1:27:17zero the associative property of
1:27:19multiplication tells us that b 7x can be
1:27:22expressed as B 3x * B 4X let's see what
1:27:27happens when we take the logarithm base
1:27:29B of both sides log base B of 7x is
1:27:34simply 7x like before the log base B and
1:27:38the exponent on B cancel out leaving
1:27:41just the exponent and log base B of
1:27:44these two terms are 3x and 4x
1:27:47respectively so the three terms we get
1:27:49after taking log base B are the three
1:27:52exponents of B 7x 3x and 4x and to write
1:27:57the resulting equation we need to
1:27:59combine these terms by adding not
1:28:01multiplying that shouldn't be surprising
1:28:04logarithms effectively bring exponents
1:28:06down and we already observed this
1:28:08property about multiplying
1:28:11exponentials let's go to an extreme and
1:28:13write B 7x as b x multiplied by itself
1:28:187even times now when we take the
1:28:20logarithm base B of both sides we get
1:28:23seven distinct in log base B of B to the
1:28:26X terms that means that log base B of B
1:28:297x is 7 log Bas B of B to the x or in
1:28:34general log base B of B to the NX is n
1:28:39logs Bas B of B to the X we can take the
1:28:42coefficient of x in the exponent and
1:28:45move it to the coefficient of the
1:28:47logarithm we're almost ready for the
1:28:49rules of differentiation but first
1:28:52another important property of
1:28:53exponential
1:28:54functions any exponential function can
1:28:57be expressed as an equivalent
1:28:59exponential function with any other
1:29:01base so here's the graph of y = 2 to the
1:29:05X again we can get the exact same graph
1:29:07from an exponential equation that has
1:29:09another base such as 3 so Y = 2 x can be
1:29:14expressed as y = 3 raised to the
1:29:17something let's find the something by
1:29:20setting the Expressions equal to each
1:29:22other 3 raised to the Something = 2
1:29:25raised to X let's take the logarithm of
1:29:28both sides to isolate the red something
1:29:31variable we need to be careful which
1:29:33base to use for the logarithm we want to
1:29:36isolate the red something so we'll take
1:29:38the log base 3 of both sides since three
1:29:41is the base whose exponent we want to
1:29:43isolate the left side simplifies to our
1:29:46red variable on the right side we take
1:29:48the exponent out and give us X logs base
1:29:513 of 2 and that's the answer 2 the x is
1:29:55the same function as 3 raised to the log
1:29:58base 3 of 2 * X and the calculator will
1:30:01tell us that log base 3 of 2 is about
1:30:040.63
1:30:09093 here's the pattern for switching
1:30:12bases the old base raised to the X power
1:30:15equals the new base raised to the power
1:30:18of log base new base of old base * X so
1:30:23these are the same functions and the
1:30:25point is it's not the base that
1:30:27determines the shape of the exponential
1:30:29function but a combination of the base
1:30:32and whatever coefficient the independent
1:30:34variable has in the
1:30:36exponent the same curve can be described
1:30:39by lots of exponential functions having
1:30:41whatever base you choose however there's
1:30:45a very special exponential base his
1:30:47value is about
1:30:502.718 it's so special that it has its
1:30:53own symbol lowercase e I'll use green as
1:30:56a reminder that e is a constant like two
1:30:59or three not a
1:31:01variable it's kind of a surprise that
1:31:03the constant e pops up in some simple
1:31:08formulas it's a constant of nature like
1:31:11pi and I'll show you in a moment why e
1:31:14is so useful in calculus and why it's
1:31:16called the natural base here's a graph
1:31:19of the exponential function y = 2 X and
1:31:24here's y = 3 x since e is between 2 and
1:31:283 it shouldn't be too surprising that y
1:31:31= e to the x is between them it's a very
1:31:34special Base number but its curve looks
1:31:37just like any other exponential
1:31:40curve if we have a function y = e to X
1:31:44we can find y given X like any other
1:31:47function and we can invert it to express
1:31:49X in terms of Y using the
1:31:52logarithm if y = e to X then X = log
1:31:56base e of Y well the logarithm base e is
1:32:01also special and it has a special symbol
1:32:04and name the natural logarithm or
1:32:07natural log and for its symbol instead
1:32:09of writing L base e we write Ln I know
1:32:14that seems backwards but it's from the
1:32:16Latin Ln means natural
1:32:19log so log base e of Y is equivalent to
1:32:22this expression which can be pronounced
1:32:25as natural logarithm of Y natural log of
1:32:29Y Ln of Y or even Ln y so once more Ln
1:32:35is a mathematical shorthand for log base
1:32:38e the natural log also pops up
1:32:41surprisingly in some simple
1:32:44formulas we'll see this limit again in a
1:32:47moment when printed Ln can look like one
1:32:51n so when handwritten you'll often C Ln
1:32:54written in script or cursive with a
1:32:56loopy L like this here are some examples
1:33:00I found online it's not a big deal I
1:33:02just don't want you to be confused when
1:33:04you see the style and I suggest you use
1:33:07it just write Ln in cursive like it was
1:33:10a
Differentiation rules for exponents
1:33:12word now we're ready for the
1:33:14differentiation rules for
1:33:17exponentials as usual we'll find the
1:33:19slope at a red Point by finding the
1:33:21slope between the red point and a nearby
1:33:23Green Point whose x coordinate is x + H
1:33:28then we'll take the limit as H
1:33:29approaches zero and see what we
1:33:32get our function is 2 X so we plug that
1:33:36into our limit equation note that we
1:33:38have 2 raised to x + H
1:33:41power we can rewrite this as 2 x * 2 H
1:33:47remember now we have 2 to the X twice in
1:33:50the numerator which we can factor out to
1:33:53get 2 x * 2 H -1 all over H remember
1:33:59we're taking the limit as H approaches 0
1:34:02and 2 to the X won't change as H changes
1:34:05because there's no h in it so we can
1:34:07pull it out of the limit now I told you
1:34:10earlier that this limit is the natural
1:34:12log of this number like
1:34:17this and so the derivative of 2 x is 2 x
1:34:23* the natural logarithm of 2 and in
1:34:26general the derivative of B to the x is
1:34:29the natural log of B * B to the X and
1:34:33that's a differentiation rule for
1:34:35exponents we'll make it stronger in a
1:34:38moment but it's good to know that the
1:34:39derivative of B to the x is the natural
1:34:42log of B times the original exponential
1:34:45function B to the
1:34:47X quick what's the derivative of 7 to
1:34:50the x
1:34:53it's the natural logarithm of the base 7
1:34:57times the original exponential function
1:34:597 to the X
1:35:02easy now what if the base were the
1:35:04natural base e same thing the derivative
1:35:08of e to the x is the natural log of e
1:35:11times the original exponential function
1:35:13e to the X well what's the natural log
1:35:17of e Ln e means the exponent on base e
1:35:22remember the base of the natural
1:35:23logarithm Ln is always e that results in
1:35:27E so Ln e is one because E rais power of
1:35:32one is e this is not a special rule for
1:35:35E any log base B of B that is the
1:35:39logarithm of any number to its own base
1:35:42is one because B raised to the power of
1:35:44one is
1:35:46B so log base e of e is one we just have
1:35:51a special symbol for log base e Ln so Ln
1:35:55E equals 1 we substitute the natural log
1:35:59of e which is one into our derivative
1:36:01and simplify to get the derivative of e
1:36:04to the x is e to the X the only function
1:36:08that's its own derivative pretty neat
1:36:11and that's why e is such a special
1:36:13exponential
1:36:15base now on the screen are two equations
1:36:18or rules for derivatives of exponentials
1:36:21the bottom is just a special case of the
1:36:23top for base e since Ln e is one but
1:36:27there's one more variation to consider
1:36:29and then we'll have a single robust rule
1:36:32that will help us find the derivative of
1:36:34all exponential
1:36:36functions often the exponent will not
1:36:38simply be X but some function of X this
1:36:41is very common in real world
1:36:43applications of exponentials we can't
1:36:46use the highlighted rule above it
1:36:48applies only when the exponent matches
1:36:50the independent variable for B raised to
1:36:53a function of X they don't match so the
1:36:55first rule won't work we need to use the
1:36:58chain rule because we have a function f
1:37:00ofx embedded within an exponential since
1:37:04we just covered the chain Ru I hope
1:37:05you'll excuse me if I jump straight to
1:37:07the conclusion here and say that we
1:37:09account for the daisy chained functions
1:37:11by multiplying by the derivative of the
1:37:14exponent so the derivative with respect
1:37:16to X of B raised to some function of X
1:37:19has three factors the derivative of the
1:37:22exponent
1:37:23times the natural logarithm of the base
1:37:26B times the original exponential
1:37:29function and this is the differentiation
1:37:32rule for exponentials to know because it
1:37:34will work for any base e or otherwise
1:37:38and for any exponent x or some function
1:37:41of X let me build a chart to show this
1:37:43is true we'll put the general
1:37:46exponential function in this cell it
1:37:48corresponds to any base meaning not
1:37:51necessarily the natural base e and a
1:37:54function of X in the exponent as opposed
1:37:56to an exponent of Simply X as you'll see
1:38:00the other three cells are simpler cases
1:38:02of this
1:38:04one in the cell above the base isn't
1:38:07necessarily e and there's no function in
1:38:09the exponent meaning the exponent is
1:38:12simply X this cell represents the
1:38:14special case where the Bas is e and the
1:38:17exponent is a function of
1:38:19X and finally this cell represents the
1:38:22special case where the base is e and the
1:38:25exponent is simply
1:38:27X we're going to find the derivative of
1:38:30each of these exponentials using the
1:38:33differentiation rule for exponents the
1:38:36three Factor derivative from a moment
1:38:38ago I'll step through the rule for each
1:38:40cell and you'll see why we only need one
1:38:43rule we'll start here with the most
1:38:45general form the derivative of the
1:38:48exponential is always the derivative of
1:38:50the
1:38:51exponent times the natural log of the
1:38:54base times the original exponential
1:38:57function and that's the three Factor
1:38:59solution that will always work let's
1:39:02apply the same rule to y = b to X it's
1:39:06essentially the same function except the
1:39:08exponent is X instead of f ofx no
1:39:11problem we just write the three factors
1:39:13one at a time we start with the
1:39:16derivative of the exponent well the
1:39:18derivative of x is one so we can ignore
1:39:21the first Factor the second factor is
1:39:24the natural log of the base B and the
1:39:27last factor is simply the original
1:39:29exponential function B to the
1:39:33X so the derivative of B to the x is lnb
1:39:37* B to X we used the same three-part
1:39:40rule but the first Factor went to one
1:39:42since the derivative of the exponent x
1:39:45is one now let's find the derivative of
1:39:48e raised to the F ofx the derivative of
1:39:51the exponent
1:39:53times the natural log of the base since
1:39:56the base is e Ln e is 1 so the second
1:39:59factor is ignored and the third factor
1:40:02is again the original exponential
1:40:04function so the derivative of e to the f
1:40:07ofx is frime of X time e to the F ofx we
1:40:12Ed the same three-part rule but the
1:40:14second Factor went to one since L and E
1:40:16is
1:40:181 now let's find the derivative of e to
1:40:21the X using the same three-part Factor
1:40:24the derivative of the exponent the
1:40:26exponent is X and the derivative of x is
1:40:291 so the first Factor goes to one the
1:40:32second factor is the natural log of the
1:40:34base the base is e and Ln e is one so
1:40:38the second Factor also goes to one the
1:40:41third factor is the original exponential
1:40:43function e to the X so the derivative of
1:40:46e to the x is e to the X the only
1:40:50function that's its own derivative we
1:40:52use the same same three-part rule but
1:40:54the first Factor went to one since the
1:40:56derivative of the exponent x is one and
1:41:00the second Factor also went to one since
1:41:02Ln e is one and that just left the third
1:41:05factor which is the original exponential
1:41:08function the point of this chart is that
1:41:10exponential functions come in several
1:41:12varieties but you don't need to know
1:41:14several rules just this one it will give
1:41:18you the correct derivative for all
1:41:20exponentials as long as you know that
1:41:22the derivative with respect the x is one
1:41:25and that L and E is one one rule to ring
1:41:29them
Differentiation rules for logarithms
1:41:33all next is logarithms the rules for
1:41:37logarithms can also be derived with the
1:41:39chain rule but again for the sake of
1:41:41expediency please excuse me if I jump to
1:41:44the rules like we did for exponentials
1:41:46we'll use the most general form of the
1:41:48logarithm function having any base B not
1:41:52necessarily e
1:41:53and the argument can be some function of
1:41:55X not necessarily plain
1:41:58X the general differentiation rule for
1:42:01logarithms also has three factors that
1:42:03kind of correlate to the factors for
1:42:05exponentials the first factor is the
1:42:08derivative of the function that's the
1:42:10same the second factor is one over the
1:42:13natural log of the base this is the
1:42:16reciprocal of the factor for
1:42:17exponentials and the third factor is one
1:42:20over the argument function f ofx the
1:42:23third Factor isn't really that similar
1:42:25to the third factor in the exponential
1:42:27rule but with practice you'll get it the
1:42:30fractions are often combined so you
1:42:32might see the rule like this I'll keep
1:42:34it as three separate factors in the
1:42:36logarithm chart so you can see each
1:42:38factor
1:42:39clearly we'll start with the general
1:42:41cell again in the lower leftand corner
1:42:44and apply the new three Factor rule for
1:42:46logarithms the derivative of the
1:42:48logarithms argument frime of
1:42:51x * 1 over the natural log of the
1:42:55base * 1 over the argument like before
1:42:59we'll use this rule as our pattern it'll
1:43:02work for all the logarithm
1:43:04Expressions let's apply it to Y = log
1:43:07base B of X here the logarithms argument
1:43:10is X not a function of X the first
1:43:13factor is the derivative of the argument
1:43:15the derivative of x is one so we can
1:43:18ignore this
1:43:19Factor the second factor is one over the
1:43:22natural log of the base 1 / L and
1:43:26B and the third factor is the reciprocal
1:43:29of the argument 1
1:43:31/x so the derivative with respect to X
1:43:34of log base B of X is 1 / natural log of
1:43:38B *
1:43:39X let's apply the rule to this cell and
1:43:42find the derivative of the natural log
1:43:44of some function of X the first factor
1:43:47is the derivative of the argument frime
1:43:50of
1:43:50X the second factor is 1 over the
1:43:53natural log of the base the base of Ln
1:43:56the natural log is e and 1 / Ln e is 1
1:44:01so the second Factor goes to
1:44:03one and the third factor is one over the
1:44:07argument so the derivative of the
1:44:09natural log of some function of X is the
1:44:12derivative of the function divided by
1:44:14the
1:44:16function now let's apply the rule to the
1:44:18derivative of Ln X the first factor is
1:44:22the derivative of the argument X so it's
1:44:24one and can be
1:44:26ignored the second factor is one over
1:44:28the natural log of the base the natural
1:44:31log of Base e is one so the second
1:44:33Factor can also be ignored this leaves
1:44:36the third Factor one over the argument
1:44:39so the derivative of Ln X is 1
1:44:43/x so once again a single rule for the
1:44:46most General logarithm will work for any
1:44:49of these special cases and these are the
1:44:52differentiation rules for exponentials
1:44:54and logarithms that you should
1:44:58know and so finally we've covered all
1:45:01these rules of differentiation it's a
1:45:04lot of material it's pretty much the
1:45:06entire first semester of calculus
1:45:08remember calculus is all about
1:45:10performing two operations on functions
1:45:13and we've just covered the first
1:45:14operation
1:45:16differentiation when we differentiate a
1:45:18function the result is the function's
1:45:21derivative the other operation is called
1:45:23integration when we integrate a function
1:45:26the result is the function's
1:45:28integral as a preface to start learning
1:45:30about integration I need to introduce
The anti-derivative (aka integral)
1:45:32the
1:45:37anti-derivative suppose we're given a
1:45:39function and told that it's a derivative
1:45:41fime of x what then is f ofx in other
1:45:45words what's the function whose
1:45:47derivative is fime of x if frime of X is
1:45:52the derivative of f ofx then f ofx is
1:45:55the anti-derivative of frime of X the
1:45:58second calculus operation integration
1:46:01depends on being able to find
1:46:03anti-derivatives in fact the integral is
1:46:06the
1:46:07anti-derivative this is the important
1:46:09topic for the second half of calculus
1:46:11because differentiation and integration
1:46:14are almost exact opposites of each other
1:46:18but let's start simply suppose fime of X
The power rule for integration
1:46:21= x^2 how can we find out what f ofx is
1:46:25just to be clear we're not trying to
1:46:27find the derivative of X2 the power rule
1:46:30tells us the derivative of x^2 is 2x
1:46:33easy instead we need to use the power
1:46:36rule backwards we're looking for the
1:46:38function whose derivative is x^2 or the
1:46:41anti-derivative of
1:46:43x^2 as a reminder here's the power rule
1:46:46shortcut for when X the N has a
1:46:48coefficient K the derivative with
1:46:50respect to X of K * X the N is KNN * X
1:46:56nus1 remember we bring the exponent
1:46:58downstairs multiply by any coefficient
1:47:01that's already there and then reduce the
1:47:03exponent by one so imagine that we did
1:47:07this to some function f ofx and the
1:47:09result was frime of X =
1:47:12x^2 what function f ofx did we start
1:47:16with let's muscle through the power rule
1:47:19backwards to take the derivative of a
1:47:21power weed reduce the exponent by one so
1:47:24to take the anti-derivative of a power
1:47:27we'll need to increase it by one so we
1:47:29have something X cubed let's use our
1:47:32imaginations for a moment and see what
1:47:34happens when the green question mark is
1:47:36one that would make F ofx = to X cub and
1:47:40fime of X the derivative of x cubed = to
1:47:453x^2 hm 3x^2 is 3 times larger than
1:47:49frime of X we're targeting so we need a
1:47:52factor factor that will reduce it by 1/3
1:47:55so the green coefficient must be 1/3
1:47:58it's always easy to check
1:47:59anti-derivatives just take its
1:48:01derivative and see if you get the
1:48:02function you started with in this case
1:48:05the derivative of 1/3 x cubed does
1:48:08indeed equal x^2 so the anti-derivative
1:48:11of x^2 is 1/3 x
1:48:14cub in general the anti-derivative of k
1:48:17x n is x n + 1 * the coefficient k / n
1:48:24+1 you may see this written as k x n + 1
1:48:29all over n +1 same thing now there's
The power rule for integration won't work for 1/x
1:48:33just one glaring challenge staring right
1:48:35at us this formula won't work when the
1:48:38denominator of the fraction is zero let
1:48:41me build a chart that shows the
1:48:43anti-derivatives of simple powers of x
1:48:45to highlight the pattern and challenge
1:48:48let's start with the derivative of x
1:48:50cubed to find the anti-derivative we add
1:48:53one to the exponent and then divide by
1:48:55that new number 1/4 x 4th in a few
1:48:59moments we're going to make a small
1:49:00adjustment to this expression and the
1:49:02others on this chart so the
1:49:04anti-derivative of X cubed isn't exactly
1:49:071/4 x to 4th but you still need to know
1:49:10this anti-derivative formula for Powers
1:49:13if the derivative is x^2 then the
1:49:15anti-derivative must be 1/3 x cubed plus
1:49:19the adjustment we'll cover it soon I
1:49:21won't mention it again until then this
1:49:24anti-derivative 1/3 x cubed was the
1:49:27example we mused through to get our
1:49:28anti-derivative formula next is the
1:49:31derivative of x to the first Power which
1:49:33is just X following the formula the
1:49:37anti-derivative of X must be 12 x^2 so
1:49:41far so good here the derivative is X to
1:49:44the 0 which is 1 the anti-derivative of
1:49:471 is X since the derivative of x is 1 of
1:49:52course using the formula yields X since
1:49:541 1 * x 1 is simply
1:49:57X now when the derivative is X the ne 1
1:50:01then this is the same as 1 /x and here's
1:50:04where the formula breaks down because it
1:50:06results in a denominator of zero so this
1:50:09is an undefined expression we'll come
1:50:12back to it but let me add a few more to
1:50:13the chart to show that the
1:50:14anti-derivative formula for Powers works
1:50:17for every other power positive or
1:50:19negative it also works for fractional
1:50:21Powers but I don't show any on the chart
1:50:24it works for everything except when the
1:50:26exponent is -1 which corresponds to 1 /x
1:50:29we cannot use this formula to find the
1:50:31anti-derivative of 1
1:50:33/x but 1 /x does have an anti-derivative
1:50:37what is it you might remember this chart
1:50:40where we covered the differentiation
1:50:42rules for logarithms here we showed that
1:50:45the derivative of the natural log of x
1:50:47was 1 /x that must mean that the
1:50:50anti-derivative of 1 /x is the natural
1:50:53log of x almost this one needs another
1:50:56slight adjustment in addition to this
1:50:58slight adjustment but we'll cover the
1:51:01special natural logarithm adjustment
1:51:03right now here's the graph of frime of X
1:51:06as x^ -1 or 1/x I graphed it in pink
1:51:11because it's the slope the slope of what
1:51:14it's anti-derivative which is the
1:51:15natural log of x shown in the white
1:51:18curve here's where the challenge arises
1:51:21the natural log function is the defined
1:51:23only for positive X values the right
1:51:25half of the graph but 1 /x is defined
1:51:28for positive and negative values but not
1:51:31zero so we need a white function curve
1:51:34on the left side of the graph that
1:51:36answers the anti-derivative question
1:51:38what function has this
1:51:40derivative let's note that the pink
1:51:42curve 1 /x is symmetrical across the
1:51:45origin and so can be spun around 180°
1:51:48without changing this means that every
1:51:51pink Point has a twin across the origin
1:51:54with opposite coordinates and so the
1:51:56white function will have reflected
1:51:57points across the y AIS with the same
1:52:00slope thus our white function the
1:52:02anti-derivative of 1 /x is the natural
1:52:05log of the absolute value of x this
1:52:09function is the anti-derivative that
1:52:10works perfectly for both positive and
1:52:13negative X values so here's the general
1:52:16anti-derivative rule for Powers the top
1:52:19rule the bump up the exponent rule works
1:52:22all the time except when n the exponent
1:52:25on X is -1 when n is -1 then that's the
1:52:29anti-derivative of K overx which is K *
1:52:33the natural log of the absolute value of
The constant of integration +C
1:52:37x we still have this adjustment I
1:52:39promised so let me explain what it is
1:52:41and why it's needed I'll illustrate by
1:52:44taking the anti-derivative of a polom
1:52:47we're starting with pols because they're
1:52:49easy and straightforward we'll cover the
1:52:51anti-derivative of other function types
1:52:54later the additional rule for
1:52:56differentiation says that the derivative
1:52:58of the sum is equal to the sum of the
1:53:00derivatives and the same rule applies to
1:53:02anti-derivatives the anti-derivative of
1:53:05the sum is equal to the sum of the
1:53:07anti-derivatives so we can find the
1:53:09anti-derivative of this function term by
1:53:12term we'll go through these quickly the
1:53:14anti-derivative of 8X cued is something
1:53:17X 4th coefficient 8 / 4 is 2 so 2 x x 4
1:53:23it's always easy to check by going
1:53:25backwards the derivative of 2x 4 is
1:53:28equal to 8 x Cub so we can be confident
1:53:31that the first term is right next term
1:53:34the anti-derivative of 3x^2 is something
1:53:37X cubed coefficient 3 over the new
1:53:40exponent 3 is 1 so the second term is
1:53:43plus X cubed the term minus 6X has
1:53:47anti-derivative something
1:53:49x^2 -6 / the new exponent 2 is -3 so the
1:53:54third term of the anti-derivative is
1:53:57minus
1:53:583x^2 and the last term is 1 which we can
1:54:01think of as 1 x to the 0 so the exponent
1:54:04of the anti-derivative is 1 and the
1:54:06coefficient is 1 over 1 or 1 so just
1:54:09plain X and this checks out the
1:54:11derivative with respect to X of X is 1
1:54:15well it looks like we're done we know
1:54:17that frime of X is the derivative of F
1:54:19ofx and that f ofx is the
1:54:21anti-derivative of frime of X here's the
1:54:25anti-derivative we found and we can
1:54:27validate by taking the derivative term
1:54:29by
1:54:32term perfect we nailed it but now let's
1:54:35consider the same function f ofx except
1:54:38it has + one all the derivative terms
1:54:41are the
1:54:43same and we add the derivative of one
1:54:46but the derivative of one is zero by the
1:54:48constant rule so the derivative of this
1:54:51new f ofx is the same as the previous
1:54:54one and it's the same if we add two or
1:54:58subtract one or add or subtract any
1:55:01constant all of these functions have the
1:55:04same derivative the derivative we
1:55:06started with 8X Cub + 3x^2 - 6X +
1:55:111 here's what's going on here's a graph
1:55:15of the anti-derivative we found 2 x 4 +
1:55:19x Cub - 3x^2 + x X and here's the graph
1:55:23of the derivative we started with 8 x
1:55:26Cub + 3x^2 - 6X + 1 remember we started
1:55:32with this pink derivative and we backed
1:55:33into the white equation by taking the
1:55:36anti-derivative the pink derivative
1:55:38curve looks reasonable it says the
1:55:40derivative is zero at these three points
1:55:43where the white slope is
1:55:44zero now let's look at the next equation
1:55:47up the one that ends with + one note
1:55:51that this simply translates the white
1:55:53curve straight up by one unit the slopes
1:55:56don't change everything is just shifted
1:55:58up this makes sense both equations yield
1:56:02the same pink derivative same with the
1:56:04plus two
1:56:05version and the
1:56:07minus1 we can add any positive or
1:56:10negative constant to a function without
1:56:12changing its derivative because adding a
1:56:15constant just moves the entire curve up
1:56:17or down without changing its slope
1:56:20anywhere thus each member of this family
1:56:23of functions has the same
1:56:26derivative so when we find the
1:56:28anti-derivative of the right function
1:56:30which one do we choose well we designate
1:56:33the whole family by adding plus C where
1:56:37Capital C represents any constant and is
1:56:40called the constant of integration this
1:56:42is true for all anti-derivatives not
1:56:45just the anti-derivative of powers and
1:56:47polinomial every function has exactly
1:56:50one derivative but every function has an
1:56:52infinite number of anti-derivatives
1:56:54because they can be shifted up or down
1:56:57by constant C and still have the same
1:57:00derivative so we specify the whole
1:57:02family of functions by including the
1:57:04plus C constant of integration when we
1:57:06find anti-derivatives so the adjustment
1:57:10I promised is the constant of
1:57:11integration plus C it should always be
1:57:14included in anti-derivative functions
1:57:17and so our general anti-derivative rule
1:57:19for Powers needs to be updated to
1:57:21include the constant of
Anti-derivative notation
1:57:26integration regarding anti-derivative
1:57:28notation when we're given a function
1:57:30called fime of X it seems pretty clear
1:57:33that its anti-derivative would simply be
1:57:35the function name f without the prime
1:57:38indicator since taking the derivative
1:57:41adds a prime symbol taking the
1:57:43anti-derivative reasonably it seems
1:57:45removes a prime
1:57:47symbol but when a function doesn't have
1:57:49a prime symbol how do we denote its
1:57:51anti- derivative well the convention is
1:57:54that we capitalize the function letter
1:57:57so capital F ofx is the anti-derivative
1:58:00of lowercase f ofx and the derivative of
1:58:03capital F ofx is lowercase f
1:58:07ofx when we intend to denote the
1:58:09derivative of a function f ofx we're
1:58:12already familiar with expressing this as
1:58:14frime of X and as d by DX of f
1:58:18ofx for the anti-derivative of f ofx we
1:58:21can Express this as uppercase F ofx as
1:58:24already mentioned or we can use this new
1:58:27calculus
1:58:31notation this is the integral symbol
1:58:34it's not a Greek letter it's an
1:58:35elongated s for some we'll get into the
1:58:38details in a few minutes the function
1:58:41whose anti-derivative we're finding is
1:58:43called the integrant when I introduce
1:58:46the anti-derivative concept I called
1:58:48this function frime of x to emphasize
1:58:50that it's already the Der ative and that
1:58:52we are going backwards from
1:58:54it when you see an integral expression
1:58:57the integrant won't have a prime symbol
1:58:59as a reminder the integral symbol means
1:59:02find the anti-derivative of the
1:59:04integrand and the differential DX
1:59:07denotes the variable of integration this
1:59:10expression has an intuitive
1:59:11interpretation that we'll be ready for
1:59:13in just a
1:59:14moment here's our sample function and we
1:59:16were asked what function has this
1:59:18derivative we applied the power rule for
1:59:21anti-derivative term by term and got
1:59:23this function the anti-derivative we
1:59:26express the anti-derivative operation
1:59:28with the integral symbol like
1:59:34this the
1:59:35integral of a function yields its
1:59:40anti-derivative remember to include the
1:59:42constant of
1:59:45integration so the second calculus
1:59:47operation integration is finding the
1:59:50anti-derivative but it's so much more
1:59:52more than that and has interesting
1:59:53applications that make it suitable for
1:59:55solving lots of real world
1:59:58problems I want to show you another more
The integral as the area under a curve (using the limit)
2:00:01insightful interpretation of integration
2:00:04but I need to start in kind of a strange
2:00:06way I'll draw a coordinate system where
2:00:09the horizontal axis denotes time in
2:00:11seconds and the vertical axis denotes
2:00:14velocity in meters per
2:00:16second suppose we have a particle
2:00:19physicists and Engineers use particles
2:00:21in thought EXP experiments like this so
2:00:23they don't have to worry about measuring
2:00:24from the front edge or back Edge it's
2:00:27just a dimensionless spec so they're all
2:00:29the same so this particle is moving at a
2:00:32constant velocity of 2 m/s for 8 seconds
2:00:36what's the particle's displacement after
2:00:38these 8 seconds displacement is the
2:00:41vector form of distance so for this
2:00:43example you can think of displacement as
2:00:45distance since the particle is moving in
2:00:47One Direction along a straight line this
2:00:50is a pretty easy problem 2 m/s * 8
2:00:54seconds the unit seconds cancels leaving
2:00:5716 M as it turns out the area under a
2:01:00velocity curve is always equal to the
2:01:02displacement 2 high * 8 wide
2:01:0616 now to illustrate the points I'm
2:01:09making I'm using displacement and
2:01:11velocity but there are many phenomena
2:01:13that fit this model for example I could
2:01:16have used total electrical charge and
2:01:18electric
2:01:19current or population and and growth
2:01:23rate or energy and
2:01:26power but I chose displacement and
2:01:28velocity because people have an
2:01:30intuitive understanding so please don't
2:01:32think we're just learning how to solve
2:01:34distance problems the Calculus Tools
2:01:36we're learning can be applied to many
2:01:38types of
2:01:39situations so this red area representing
2:01:42displacement is intuitively simple when
2:01:45the velocity doesn't change like in this
2:01:47example but what if the particle started
2:01:49at 2 m/s and accelerated smoothly to 4
2:01:53m/s not as straightforward unless you
2:01:56realize all you have to do is find the
2:01:58area then it's still simple because the
2:02:00velocity line is straight and you can
2:02:02use Simple geometry to find the
2:02:04displacement for this graph is 24 M this
2:02:08area is still 16 and this triangle is 8
2:02:11that's geometry not
2:02:13calculus okay what if the velocity over
2:02:16time is described by a curvy line now
2:02:19we've got a challenge we know the
2:02:21function f of T it tells us the
2:02:23particle's velocity at any point in time
2:02:26and there must be some other function
2:02:28I'll call it capital A of T that tells
2:02:30us the red area up to any point in time
2:02:33T the a stands for area but we don't
2:02:36know what function a is well we still
2:02:40want to know the area so here's one way
2:02:42to attack the problem we'll start by
2:02:44estimating the red area under F of T by
2:02:47dividing it into vertical rectangles
2:02:49it's easy to find the area of a
2:02:51rectangle
2:02:52then we'll add up all the rectangular
2:02:54areas and that will be our estimate of
2:02:56the red area for the sake of convenience
2:02:59let's make the width of each rectangle 1
2:03:01second so delta T equals 1 and we'll
2:03:04draw eight rectangles since the motion
2:03:07lasted 8 seconds for clarity and
2:03:10consistency we'll make the height of
2:03:12each rectangle be the function's value
2:03:14at the rectangle's left Edge here's what
2:03:17I mean for the first rectangle its
2:03:19height is this distance which is f of 0
2:03:23because its left Edge is at time t equal
2:03:260 the width is delta T so the
2:03:29rectangle's area is f of 0 * delta T
2:03:33height * width the second rectangle will
2:03:36have height F of 1 its left Edge its
2:03:39area is f of 1 * delta T and so on for
2:03:43the other six
2:03:45rectangles each rectangle is an estimate
2:03:48of the red area over its width delta T
2:03:52the height of each rectangle is the
2:03:54function's value F of T so the total
2:03:57area of the eight rectangles which is
2:03:59our estimated area for red is the sum as
2:04:02T goes from 0 to 7 of f of T delta T add
2:04:07up all eight of the height times
2:04:10widths we end with seven and not eight
2:04:13because we started counting at zero
2:04:15eight rectangles 0 through
2:04:187 well that might be a pretty good
2:04:20estimate but each rectangle fits the
2:04:22curve imperfectly so there's going to be
2:04:24some error in our estimate more narrower
2:04:28rectangles will more closely fit the
2:04:30curve and provide a better estimate so
2:04:33we'll let delta T get smaller and
2:04:35smaller maybe this made you think of the
2:04:38method we use to estimate the slope of a
2:04:40curve at a point we let the distance
2:04:42between two points get smaller and
2:04:44smaller all the way down to the
2:04:45differential DX and that's what we'll do
2:04:48with these
2:04:49rectangles we'll make the area in our
2:04:52estimate approach Zero by using a larger
2:04:54and larger number of rectangles having
2:04:57narrower and narrower widths until we
2:04:59get to the Limit as the width approaches
2:05:01zero the
2:05:03differential in this example our
2:05:05independent variable happens to be T
2:05:07instead of X so the differential will be
2:05:10DT adding up an infinite number of
2:05:13things isn't easy it could take all day
2:05:16when we had eight rectangles
2:05:17corresponding to time t = 0 through 7 we
2:05:21use this
2:05:22but calculus has some special notation
2:05:24to add up a Continuum of differentially
2:05:27small numbers it's the integral symbol
2:05:30from the
2:05:31anti-derivative as you'll see we treat
2:05:33it a lot like the summation symbol for
2:05:35example the summation expression above
2:05:38includes the lower and upper bounds of
2:05:39the summation here and the integral
2:05:42symbol gets lower and upper bounds also
2:05:45for our example we're starting at time
2:05:47tal 0 and going all the way through to
2:05:50tal 8 this represents adding up all the
2:05:53infinitely many differential rectangles
2:05:55between 0 and 8 in the summation
2:05:58expression we're adding up all the
2:06:00rectangular areas which are height time
2:06:02width F of T * delta T and we do the
2:06:06same thing in the integral expression
2:06:08except the width is DT instead of delta
2:06:12T we only apply the integral operation
2:06:15to differential widths and this integral
2:06:17is equal to the function a of T the
2:06:20equation says the area under the curve
2:06:23of f of T up to tal 8 is the integral of
2:06:27f of T DT from 0 to
2:06:308 I'm telling you this is true but I
2:06:33want to convince you I think this will
2:06:35give you a better understanding of this
2:06:37extremely important calculus concept
2:06:40let's consider our velocity curve again
2:06:42we know the function f of T describes
2:06:44the particle's velocity at any time T
2:06:47here's our function a of T that
2:06:49represents the area under the curve up
2:06:52to T it looks like T is three but it
2:06:54doesn't matter it's got to be something
2:06:57now suppose I draw our very thin
2:06:59rectangle here its width is DT the
2:07:02differential change in time T I'm
2:07:05drawing the rectangle kind of thick so
2:07:07we can see it but its width DT is
2:07:09approaching zero so invisibly thin its
2:07:13height is f of T the velocity of the
2:07:16particle at time T and the thin
2:07:18rectangle's area is Da the differential
2:07:21change in area due to the differential
2:07:24change in time
2:07:25DT now if your attention is drifting
2:07:28please perk up this could be the most
2:07:30important minute in the entire video we
2:07:33can write an equation relating these
2:07:35three variables da equals F of T DT or
2:07:39area of rectangle equals height * width
2:07:43now let's divide both sides by DT to get
2:07:46da by dtal F of T so we have an unknown
2:07:51function a of T we like to know what it
2:07:54is but we don't however we know its
2:07:57derivative is f of T so if F of T is the
2:08:01derivative of a of T then a of T must be
2:08:05the anti-derivative or integral of f of
2:08:08T we find the cumulative area under a
2:08:11function curve using the anti-derivative
2:08:13of the function and that's the second I
2:08:17think more insightful interpretation of
2:08:19integration finding the area under a
2:08:22function's curve let's try this out with
2:08:24our earlier examples now I'm going to be
2:08:27a little sloppy because I'm anxious to
2:08:29show you how well this works but I'll
2:08:31clean up the sloppiness afterwards
2:08:34here's the constant velocity example F
2:08:36of T equals 2 since the velocity is a
2:08:39constant 2
2:08:40m/s the area function a of T we just
2:08:44discovered is the anti-derivative of f
2:08:46of T So a prime of T equals F of T and
2:08:50we want a of T so let's take the
2:08:53anti-derivative of both sides and we get
2:08:55a of tal 2T the anti-derivative of 2
2:08:59remember is 2 * the independent variable
2:09:02T So
2:09:032T as always it's easy to check by going
2:09:06backwards using the power rule that the
2:09:08derivative with respect to T of 2T gets
2:09:11us back to two and the derivative of a
2:09:14of T is a prime of T so we're all
2:09:18balanced so we have a function for a of
2:09:20T let's plug in 8 and we get 16 M which
2:09:24is the same answer we got earlier
2:09:25through algebra now let's try the
2:09:28velocity line with the nonzero slope by
2:09:31inspection we can see that the function
2:09:32for the line is f of T = 1/4 t + 2 this
2:09:37is from algebra y = Mt + b the slope is
2:09:41rise over run or 1/4 and the Y intercept
2:09:44is 2 this is algebra not calculus so I'm
2:09:47not covering the details F of T is equal
2:09:49to a prime of T but we want a of T so
2:09:53let's take the anti-derivative of both
2:09:55sides to get a of T = 1/8 T ^2 + 2T
2:09:59using our power rule for
2:10:01anti-derivatives plug in 8 and we get
2:10:041/8 of 64 which is 8 + 16 so 24 M like
2:10:10before okay we should be convinced that
2:10:13given a function f of T it's
2:10:15anti-derivative will yield the function
2:10:17denoting the area under its
2:10:20curve now now in my enthusiasm to show
2:10:22you the relationship between a
2:10:24function's anti-derivative and the area
2:10:26under the function's curve you may have
2:10:28noticed that I sloly skipped over two
2:10:30important details we'd mentioned earlier
2:10:33first the constant C we add to the
2:10:35anti-derivative to show that there are a
2:10:37multitude of functions all having the
2:10:39same
2:10:40derivative second the lower and upper
2:10:42limit we added to the integral symbol to
2:10:45denote the range over which we were
2:10:46summing up the anti-derivatives
2:10:48differential
2:10:49rectangles let me address the these
2:10:51considerations by modifying our problem
2:10:53slightly suppose now we're interested in
2:10:56the area under F of T between tal 2 and
2:10:59T = 8 this would represent just the
2:11:02particle displacement that occurs
2:11:04between 2 and 8 seconds how can we find
2:11:08this new smaller red area well it's this
2:11:11larger red area that we've already found
2:11:14a of 8 minus this smaller red area a of
2:11:18two the difference is the area we wanted
2:11:21to find eight is the upper bound and two
2:11:24is the lower bound the notation means
2:11:26we're going to start with a differential
2:11:28rectangle at tal 2 and sum up all the
2:11:32rectangular areas up to T = 8 and we
2:11:35accomplish this by taking the
2:11:37anti-derivative of the function f of T
2:11:40we already did this we relabeled F of t
2:11:42as a prime of T to emphasize that it's
2:11:45anti-derivative was a of T the function
2:11:47that Returns the cumulative area under F
2:11:50of t and the anti-derivative of f of T
2:11:53is 1/8 T ^2 + 2T + C we evaluate this
2:11:58anti-derivative at T = 8 and subtract
2:12:01the value we get at T = 2 here's how we
Evaluating definite integrals
2:12:05write the expression this vertical bar
2:12:07is called the evaluation bar and when
2:12:09solving an integral it means to plug the
2:12:12upper limit into the expression to the
2:12:14left of the bar then subtract the
2:12:16expression's value at the lower limit
2:12:18the expression to the left of the
2:12:20evaluation bar must be the
2:12:22anti-derivative of the integrant the
2:12:24function whose area we're evaluating so
2:12:27let's find the area between tal 2 and 8
2:12:29by solving this integral first we plug
2:12:32in t = 8 then we subtract for T = 2 the
2:12:37top expression is 8 + 16 + C so 24 + C
2:12:43the bottom expression is 1 12 + 4 + C so
2:12:484 and 1/2 + C when when we subtract we
2:12:52get 192 please notice the constant of
2:12:55integration C cancels since we subtract
2:12:58one from the other and so the answer to
2:13:01our question what's the red area between
2:13:03t = 2 and 8 is 192 which represents 19 1
2:13:0812 m in the context of our velocity
2:13:10problem now let's put everything
Definite and indefinite integrals (comparison)
2:13:13together and add some Precision to our
2:13:15calculus vocabulary when an integral
2:13:18expression has no upper or lower bounds
2:13:20that's called called an indefinite
2:13:22integral that's easy to remember because
2:13:24we're indefinite about what the
2:13:25boundaries might be an indefinite
2:13:28integral is equal to the anti-derivative
2:13:30of the specified function and includes
2:13:33plus C the constant of
2:13:35integration an indefinite integral is
2:13:38like the answer to a quiz question what
2:13:41function has f ofx as its derivative
2:13:44since every function has infinitely many
2:13:46anti-derivatives we specify the entire
2:13:48family of functions by including the
2:13:50Plus C constant of integration when
2:13:53solving indefinite
2:13:54integrals when an integral expression
2:13:57has boundaries it's called a definite
2:13:59integral a definite integral is equal to
2:14:02the anti-derivative of the specified
2:14:04function at the upper limit minus the
2:14:07anti-derivative of the function at the
2:14:09lower limit we can write this difference
2:14:11these two ways they mean the same
2:14:15thing so when we solve a definite
2:14:17integral of a function f ofx the first
2:14:20step is to find the indefinite integral
2:14:23that is the anti-derivative of f ofx
2:14:25because we have to evaluate it at the
2:14:27upper and lower boundary to solve the
2:14:30definite integral and as we've already
2:14:32seen the constants of integration plus C
2:14:35always cancel when we subtract so it's
2:14:38okay if you leave them off of your
2:14:40definite integral expression like
2:14:43this and so while the indefinite
2:14:46integral is a function with plus c a
2:14:49definite integral is a number the number
2:14:51that represents the area under the curve
2:14:53F ofx between the lower and upper
2:14:56boundary and of course to find the
2:14:58number you need the function here's a
2:15:01summary chart the indefinite integral is
2:15:04a function a function having the
2:15:06integrand as its derivative it includes
2:15:08the constant of integration the definite
2:15:11integral has bounds and is a number the
2:15:14anti-derivative evaluated at the upper
2:15:16bound minus the anti-derivative at the
2:15:18lower bound so to calculate the definite
2:15:21integral of a function you first need to
2:15:23know the indefinite integral of the
2:15:25function which is the function's
2:15:29anti-derivative let's do another problem
The definite integral and signed area
2:15:32here's a function f ofx = 0.1 x^2 - 1.5x
2:15:38+ 4 we're just using polom for now
2:15:41because they're so easy we'll get to
2:15:43other types of functions
2:15:45later suppose we need to know the area
2:15:48beneath the curve between x = 2 and X =
2:15:519 when we examine the area a question
2:15:54immediately presents itself what happens
2:15:56when the function has a negative value
2:15:59I've been saying area beneath but that's
2:16:01not literally the case as we'll see the
2:16:04integration operation will treat areas
2:16:07corresponding to negative function
2:16:08values as negative areas between the
2:16:11function curve and the x-axis like this
2:16:14so the green area is positive and the
2:16:16red area is negative so to be precise we
2:16:19can say that the definite an integral
2:16:21yields the signed area such that areas
2:16:24above the x-axis are considered positive
2:16:27and areas below the x-axis are
2:16:29considered
2:16:30negative okay let's find the signed area
2:16:33we need to start with the indefinite
2:16:35integral of f ofx its anti-derivative we
2:16:38call capital F
2:16:40ofx we use the same rule as before for
2:16:43each term bump up the exponent and
2:16:45divide any coefficient by the new bumped
2:16:47up
2:16:48exponent we write the definite inte with
2:16:51its boundaries 2 and 9 and write the
2:16:53anti-derivative with the evaluation bar
2:16:55having the same
2:16:57boundaries please don't put F ofx in
2:17:00here and evaluate it at the boundaries
2:17:02you've got to use the anti-derivative of
2:17:04f ofx to find the area under F ofx
2:17:08that's why the first step of any
2:17:09integration problem is to find the
2:17:11anti-derivative capital F ofx of the
2:17:14integrant lowercase f ofx and that's the
2:17:18function we evaluate to find the area
2:17:20without the plus C I apologize if I'm
2:17:23overe explaining I don't want anyone to
2:17:26struggle with the parts of calculus that
2:17:28I struggled with if I repeat something
2:17:30it's probably because I wish it had been
2:17:32repeated more than once to me anyway
2:17:35we're ready to find the area we evaluate
2:17:38the anti-derivative at the upper
2:17:40boundary 9 it's just algebra so I won't
2:17:43show
2:17:43details
2:17:450.45 next we evaluate the
2:17:47anti-derivative at the lower boundary
2:17:49two it's
2:17:525.27 then subtract upper minus lower
2:17:570.45 minus 5.27 =
2:18:025.72 and that's the signed area of f ofx
2:18:05between 2 and 9 that we needed to find
2:18:09this application of definite integrals
The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus visualized
2:18:11that we've already seen several times is
2:18:13so important that it has a special name
2:18:16the fundamental theorem of calculus in
2:18:19plain English it says that the definite
2:18:21integral of f ofx from A to B is equal
2:18:25to the difference between the
2:18:26anti-derivative of f ofx evaluated at B
2:18:30and the anti-derivative of f ofx
2:18:32evaluated at
2:18:34a it's interesting and insightful to see
2:18:37why this works here's our original
2:18:39function I'm making the lowercase f pink
2:18:42to easily identify it as a pink
2:18:44derivative curve here's the
2:18:46anti-derivative we found capital F ofx
2:18:49and here's the graph of of the
2:18:51anti-derivative white well as I keep
2:18:54saying there are many functions having
2:18:56the pink derivative the one I plotted is
2:18:58the one where the constant of
2:18:59integration C is zero so the pink curve
2:19:03is the derivative of the white curve
2:19:06that looks reasonable the white curve is
2:19:08flat here with zero slope and the pink
2:19:10derivative is
2:19:12zero in the first half of this video
2:19:15when we found the derivative we started
2:19:17with white and found pink now in the
2:19:20second half when we find the integral
2:19:22we're starting with pink and finding
2:19:25white and calculus tells us the value of
2:19:27the white curve at a point represents
2:19:30the area under the paint curve up to
2:19:32that point at least when the white curve
2:19:34crosses the origin so the area starts
2:19:36with 0 at x equal 0 okay let's try it
2:19:40out by visual inspection let's look at x
2:19:43= 1 capital F of 1 is about 3.28 just
2:19:47plug one into capital F ofx to get 3
2:19:51.28 let's eyeball the area under the
2:19:53pink curve up to x = 1 there's 1 2 we're
2:19:59missing a little bit of three but we
2:20:01have this extra up here I hope it seems
2:20:04reasonable that the area of green is
2:20:083.28 now let's look at x = 2 capital F
2:20:12of 2 is about
2:20:145.27 we found this a few moments ago by
2:20:16plugging two into capital F ofx this
2:20:19one's a little tricky to estimate but
2:20:22you can pause if you'd like to convince
2:20:24yourself that 5.28 is a reasonable value
2:20:27for the green area between x = 0 and
2:20:312 when we go up to x = 3 capital F of 3
2:20:36=
2:20:376.15 between two and three this white
2:20:40value went up by a small amount
2:20:420.88 and that corresponds to this new
2:20:45area under the curve between x = 2 and 3
2:20:490.88
2:20:52where the slope of capital F ofx is
2:20:54negative the value of pink f ofx is
2:20:56negative of course because the pink
2:20:58function is the derivative of the white
2:21:00function for example between x = 7 and 8
2:21:04capital F ofx decreases 1.06 - 2.68 is
2:21:101.62 which corresponds to the negative
2:21:13area between 7 and
2:21:158 this is how we were able to integrate
2:21:18pink F ofx between 2 and 9 by simply
2:21:21evaluating the anti-derivatives value at
2:21:24x = 2 and 9 and
2:21:30subtracting the difference in the
2:21:31anti-derivatives is the definite
2:21:33integral of the function I confess I was
The integral as a running total of its derivative
2:21:37confused and amazed in high school when
2:21:39I learned this how can evaluating a
2:21:42white function at only two points tell
2:21:44me everything that's gone on with
2:21:46another pink function between those two
2:21:48points the explanation that I wish I'd
2:21:51understood back then is that a key
2:21:54property of the anti-derivative function
2:21:56is that it's like a running total of its
2:21:58derivative here's an example suppose you
2:22:01ran your own business for a very long
2:22:04time and you have a business bank
2:22:05account whose balance increases or
2:22:08decreases daily here I'm illustrating a
2:22:11multitude of green and red rows each
2:22:14representing the daily change to the
2:22:16account balance Green for positive red
2:22:18for negative let's imagine you need need
2:22:20to determine how the balance has changed
2:22:22between two far apart dates A and B you
2:22:26have to add up all the hundreds of daily
2:22:28changes that occurred between those two
2:22:31dates but you've also kept the running
2:22:33total of your bank balance at the end of
2:22:35each day so with this you just need to
2:22:38find the two balances on the boundary
2:22:40days and subtract to determine the
2:22:42cumulative change that occurred between
2:22:44the two dates that's how definite
2:22:46integrals work and why the fundamental
2:22:48theorem of calculus is true
2:22:51since the anti-derivative is a literal
2:22:53running total of its derivative you just
2:22:56need to find the anti-derivatives value
2:22:58at the two boundary points and their
2:23:00difference will be the cumulative sum or
2:23:02area of the original function and that
2:23:05brings us to the third interpretation of
2:23:07integration adding up a lot of tiny
2:23:10amounts using the running total
2:23:12characteristic of the
2:23:14anti-derivative this is a lot like
2:23:16interpretation number two finding the
2:23:18area under a curve since it's adding up
2:23:20a lot of tiny rectangular areas but
2:23:23adding up a lot of tiny things is a bit
2:23:25more General and I think if you keep
2:23:27this interpretation in the back of your
2:23:29mind you'll be well served by
2:23:31recognizing when calculus can be used to
2:23:33solve a problem you're
2:23:36facing I'd like to formalize our
2:23:39progress so far and plot out the
2:23:40remainder of our calculus Journey here's
2:23:43a somewhat cramped summary of the rules
2:23:45of differentiation we covered in the
2:23:47first half I'll just note that the first
2:23:50five represent distinct Atomic function
2:23:52types the last three represent the ways
2:23:55in which functions can be combined
2:23:58adding multiplying and
2:24:00compositing many of these
2:24:02differentiation roles have corresponding
2:24:04integration roles for example we
2:24:06reversed the power rule for
2:24:08differentiation and figured out the rule
2:24:10to find the integral of a power function
2:24:13so given a power function we can find
2:24:15its derivative or integral this is why
2:24:18all of the examples so far have been Pol
2:24:20omals because the power function is so
2:24:22easy for both calculus
The trig rule for integration (sine and cosine)
2:24:25operations the trig functions are also
2:24:27easy when graphing the S and cosine
2:24:30functions the derivative of a function
2:24:32is the curve to that function's left so
2:24:34naturally the anti-derivative is the
2:24:36curve to the function's right just
2:24:39remember the constant of
2:24:41integration there's also a constant rule
2:24:43for integration it says that for a
2:24:45constant times a function like k f ofx
2:24:49the integral is the constant times the
2:24:51integral of the function we usually
2:24:53remember pull the constant out of the
2:24:56integral and the additional rule has an
2:24:59application for integrals it says the
2:25:01integral of the sum is equal to the sum
2:25:03of the integrals this is similar to the
2:25:06differentiation rule that says the
2:25:08derivative of the sum is the sum of the
2:25:11derivatives for exponentials it's easy
2:25:14to integrate a simple function such as B
2:25:16to the X the integral is B to X over The
2:25:20Natural log of B plus the constant of
2:25:23integration I'd be remiss if I didn't
2:25:25point out that for the special case of
2:25:27the general rule e to X the derivative
2:25:30is e to the X and so the integral of e
2:25:33to X is e to x + c e to X is its own
2:25:37derivative and therefore its own
2:25:41integral but from here integration gets
2:25:43much less straightforward in contrast to
2:25:46differentiation the truth is finding
2:25:48derivatives is easy
2:25:50if you're watching this video before
2:25:52taking Calculus class good for you get
2:25:54prepared you can be an expert on
2:25:56derivatives before your class even
2:25:58starts because taking derivatives is so
2:26:01easy it just takes practice which you
2:26:04won't get from this video I'm trying
2:26:06hard to show the fundamentals of
2:26:08calculus in a visual interesting
2:26:10memorable way but you're not going to
2:26:12get the practice you need for
2:26:13proficiency just by watching me I'll
2:26:16mention some practice resources at the
2:26:18end of this video and provide links in
2:26:20the
2:26:21description so finding derivatives is
2:26:24easy but finding integrals isn't always
2:26:27easy we'll do a few more easy
2:26:29integration problems and then I'll show
2:26:31you some difficult integrals and
2:26:32describe some of the techniques used to
2:26:34solve them there's a technique called
2:26:36integration by parts that roughly
2:26:38corresponds to trying to apply the
2:26:40product rule in reverse and another
2:26:43technique called U substitution that
2:26:45tries to apply the chain rule in reverse
2:26:48because so many real world engine
2:26:50engineering science and finance problems
2:26:52involve function products and composits
2:26:55these rules are used a lot and you
2:26:57should become familiar with them and
2:26:59comfortable using them I'll cover these
2:27:01techniques after a few simpler
2:27:06problems let's solve a simple definite
Definite integral example problem
2:27:09integral the integran consists of three
2:27:12terms so we'll apply the addition rule
2:27:14to integrate each term separately
2:27:21each mini integral has the same limits
2:27:24of integration as the original integral
2:27:26-1 to 2 the middle integrant 2x^2 has a
2:27:31constant so we'll apply the constant
2:27:33Rule and pull the coefficient out of the
2:27:35integral like this actually the third
2:27:38integral also has a constant because we
2:27:40can consider the function 4 to be 4X to
2:27:430 but an anti-derivative shortcut you
2:27:46should be familiar with is to multiply a
2:27:48standalone constant like four by the
2:27:51variable of integration X so the
2:27:53anti-derivative of 4 with respect to X
2:27:56is
2:27:574X let's go ahead and start with the
2:27:59third integral we'll evaluate 4x from -1
2:28:03to
2:28:042 the middle term becomes twice the
2:28:06integral of x^2 which is 1/3 x cubed
2:28:10evaluated from -1 to
2:28:132 and the anti-derivative of sin x is
2:28:17cine X evaluated from -1 to 2
2:28:20the rest is just arithmetic but please
2:28:23proceed carefully and deliberately I
2:28:25didn't intend it when I made up this
2:28:27problem but there are several
2:28:29opportunities to get confused with
2:28:31positive negative signs the second term
2:28:33is subtracted the first anti-derivative
2:28:36has a negative sign one of the
2:28:38boundaries is negative and of course
2:28:41when we evaluate the integral we
2:28:43subtract the lower value from the upper
2:28:45so let's go slowly left to right we'll
2:28:48plug in the upper boundary 2 into a
2:28:51cosine X and get approximately 0.41 61
2:28:56the cosine of two radians is actually
2:28:59Nega
2:29:010.416 but we've got the negative sign
2:29:03here so the expression is positive when
2:29:06we plug in the lower boundary we get.
2:29:10543 the cosine of -1 is approximately
2:29:15543 but again we have the negative sign
2:29:17so negative 54 three and we need to be
2:29:21careful because when we subtract bottom
2:29:23from Top subtracting a negative is the
2:29:26same as adding a positive so the
2:29:28difference is positive.
2:29:3019564 to four decimal
2:29:32places let's go on to the second
2:29:34integral plug in 2 and we get -2 * 1/3 2
2:29:39cubed this turns out to be -2/3 of 8
2:29:43which is approximately - 5.33 3 I'm
2:29:47carrying four digits after the decimal
2:29:49when we plug in -1 we get postive
2:29:520.666 7 and when we subtract these terms
2:29:56we get
2:29:57-6 now for the last term 4X evaluated
2:30:01from -1 to 2 is 8 - -4 which is 12 to
2:30:06any number of
2:30:07decimals now we just add up the three
2:30:09subtotals and since we've already been
2:30:11careful with the signs we add across to
2:30:14get
2:30:1569564 and that's the value of the
2:30:18definite integral let me point out some
2:30:21slightly different mechanics that result
2:30:23in the same answer instead of using the
2:30:25addition rule for integrals to break the
2:30:27problem into three distinct smaller
2:30:29integrals like we did each having its
2:30:31own expression to evaluate at the upper
2:30:33and lower bounds of integration we can
2:30:36simply add the addition rle for
2:30:38integrals to the terms one at a time
2:30:40into one expression and evaluate the
2:30:42entire expression from the lower to the
2:30:44upper bound like this when evaluating an
2:30:47expression with multiple terms a
2:30:49shortcut you might see is to use square
2:30:51brackets around the expression and place
2:30:53the bounds on the right square bracket
2:30:55and omit the valuation bar it means the
2:30:58same thing when we evaluate at the
2:31:00bounds we get the same numbers as before
2:31:03we just do the arithmetic in a different
2:31:05order it's the same answer of
2:31:08course we can use the same technique to
2:31:10specify indefinite integrals remember
2:31:13this means no upper or lower bounds so
2:31:15the answer is going to be a function not
2:31:17a number since we won't be plugging any
2:31:19bounds boundary values into the
2:31:21anti-derivative simply find the
2:31:23anti-derivative of each term one at a
2:31:25time and remember the constant of
2:31:27integration which is needed for every
2:31:29indefinite
2:31:30integral to finish the topic of
2:31:33integration we need to cover these last
2:31:35two integration techniques we use them
2:31:37for integrands for which there's no
2:31:38straightforward rule to apply usually
2:31:41when the integrand is a product of
2:31:43functions or as a composite function
2:31:45these are usually more challenging
2:31:47integrals to solve and in the real world
2:31:50more commonly
2:31:51encountered let's look at a different
2:31:53problem we did earlier where we found
2:31:55the derivative of the square root of
2:31:575x^2 + 3 using the chain rule we use the
2:32:01chain rule because we have a composite
2:32:03function a function 5x^2 + 3 within
2:32:06another function square root I'm
2:32:09rewriting the square root of 5x^2 + 3 as
2:32:125x^2 + 3 to the 1/2 power and as a
2:32:15reminder here's the chain
2:32:17rule the inner function G of X is the
2:32:20polom the outer function f ofx is the
2:32:23square
2:32:25root we started with the derivative of
2:32:28the square root outer function to get 12
2:32:315x^2 + 3 to the -2 this is the power
2:32:35rule for derivatives and the result is
2:32:37DF by DG then we need to multiply by the
2:32:40derivative of 5x^2 + 3 which is 10x this
2:32:44is DG by
2:32:46DX we can combine terms and then if you
2:32:49like exchange the - 1/2 exponent for 1
2:32:52/are < TK and that was our derivative
u-Substitution
2:32:55now suppose we want to go backwards and
2:32:58find the
2:32:58integral well nothing we've covered so
2:33:01far comes close to helping us solve this
2:33:03integral we know what the answer should
2:33:05be this function that we started with
2:33:07plus C as I've said finding derivatives
2:33:10is always easy but finding integrals can
2:33:13often be difficult let me show you an
2:33:15approach to solving difficult integrals
2:33:17called U substitution use substitution
2:33:20is a good technique to consider if the
2:33:22integrant is a product of
2:33:25functions we choose an expression within
2:33:28the integrand and replace it with a new
2:33:30expression called U I'm not sure why the
2:33:32letter U was chosen but that's what
2:33:34everybody uses so we should get used to
2:33:36it there are two expressions to choose
2:33:39from 5x and 5x^2 + 3 I'll mention
2:33:43strategies for how to choose you in a
2:33:45moment but for now I want to show you
2:33:47the mechanics of the technique and
2:33:49will'll use U = 5x^2 + 3 now our
2:33:53short-term goal is to rewrite the
2:33:55integrant in terms of U without any
2:33:58references to variable X after you write
2:34:01down your U equal statement write the
2:34:03expression for du by taking the
2:34:05derivative of both sides with respect to
2:34:07X du = 10x DX then rewrite that equation
2:34:12to isolate DX DX = du/ 10 x now let's
2:34:18plug what we know back into to the
2:34:19integral we still have 5x we haven't
2:34:22done anything with it yet next we
2:34:25multiply by U to the -2 Since U = 5x^2 +
2:34:293 and in place of DX we substitute its
2:34:33equivalent in terms of du du over 10 x
2:34:37well our 5x and 10 x can reduce to 1 12
2:34:41which is a constant we can pull out of
2:34:42the integral so we have 12 * the
2:34:45integral of U -2 du great we don't have
2:34:50any more X's everything is in terms of U
2:34:53so we can integrate with respect to U
2:34:55using the power rule for integrals we
2:34:58bump up the exponent by one and divide
2:35:00by the new exponent we have 1/2 * U to
2:35:04the 1/2 over 1/2 these 1 halfes cancel
2:35:07and that leaves us with u to the
2:35:091/2 now let's reverse the U substitution
2:35:13and plug 5x^2 + 3 back in for you we get
2:35:17the < TK of 5x^2 + 3 +
2:35:21C which is indeed the function we
2:35:23started with adding the plus C for the
2:35:25indefinite
2:35:27integral so on the top line we use the
2:35:29chain rule to find the derivative of the
2:35:31square < TK of 5x^2 + 3 then on the
2:35:34second line we used U substitution to
2:35:37integrate the derivative and as expected
2:35:39we got back to the function we started
2:35:41with plus
2:35:43C I'll walk through the steps for you
2:35:46substitution but first please notice
2:35:48this pattern when we differentiate using
2:35:50the chain rule we multiply by the
2:35:52derivative of the inner function so the
2:35:55derivative of sin 2x is 2 cosine 2X
2:35:59remember the derivative of s something
2:36:01is cosine something but the chain rule
2:36:03reminds us that we need to also multiply
2:36:06by the derivative of that
2:36:08something let's look over at the U
2:36:10substitution problem there's not always
2:36:12an inner and outer function but rather
2:36:14an expression we choose for U at this
2:36:18step where we isolate DX X will always
2:36:20get du ided the derivative of the U term
2:36:23with respect to X just to help you
2:36:26remember differentiating with the chain
2:36:28Rule and integrating using U
2:36:30substitution are opposite operations
2:36:33since we multiply by a derivative with
2:36:35the chain rule remember that we divide
2:36:37by a derivative with u
2:36:39substitution so we choose the expression
2:36:42for U knowing that we're going to divide
2:36:44by its derivative and by doing so
2:36:46hopefully make the function simpler let
2:36:49me walk through the steps for use
2:36:51substitution then we'll solve another
2:36:52problem with practice you can do some of
2:36:55these in your head but writing them down
2:36:57is good for starting out and gaining
2:36:59confidence first choose a function in
2:37:01the integrand to replace with you choose
2:37:04a function whose derivative will help
2:37:05simplify the integrand when you divide
2:37:07by it you'll get better and develop an
2:37:10instinct for what works with
2:37:12practice then differentiate the function
2:37:14you chose for you and isolate DX
2:37:17actually this step will always yield d U
2:37:19ided the derivative of U with respect to
2:37:22X this is why many calculus students
2:37:25just remember to divide by the
2:37:26derivative of U when using U
2:37:29substitution the next step is to rewrite
2:37:32the integral plugging in U for its
2:37:33function and replacing DX with its
2:37:36expression in terms of du the goal is to
2:37:39remove X entirely from the integrant so
2:37:41the integrant is in terms of U this
2:37:44should result in a simpler integration
2:37:46problem if you cannot get rid of all the
2:37:49X's then make a different choice for you
2:37:51please note that there's no guarantee
2:37:53you have substitution will work unlike
2:37:55differentiation where there are always
2:37:57straightforward rules to follow
2:37:59integration often requires some
2:38:01imagination and the flare for Creative
2:38:03problem
2:38:04solving next go ahead and integrate the
2:38:07new integrant with respect to U if
2:38:09possible we started with an integral of
2:38:11a function of X with respect to X after
2:38:14U substitution we have a function of U
2:38:16and want to integrate with respect to
2:38:18you it should be a simpler
2:38:20integral if you can't integrate then
2:38:23make another choice for you or perhaps
2:38:25the problem can't be solved with the U
2:38:27substitution method if you can integrate
2:38:30the result do so and replace U with its
2:38:32original X function and that's the
2:38:34answer to the original integration
2:38:36problem plus C let's do another problem
2:38:40let's find the integral of 4X e to the
2:38:43x^2 interesting the exponent has an
2:38:46exponent well let's dig in there are
2:38:48several choices for you that include x
2:38:514x e to x^2 or just x^2 remember that
2:38:56we're going to end up dividing by our
2:38:58choices derivative that's really what
2:39:00you should be thinking about when
2:39:01choosing you when I divide by its
2:39:03derivative will that help me get rid of
2:39:05x's choosing four or 4X won't help e to
2:39:09the x^2 that's a composite function that
2:39:11will need the chain R to differentiate
2:39:14not impossible we'll come back to it if
2:39:16we need to hm X2 looks promising its
2:39:20derivative is 2x which will cancel
2:39:22nicely with the 4X so we'll start by
2:39:24trying U =
2:39:26x^2 step two is to differentiate U we
2:39:30get du = 2x DX we do this step so that
2:39:34we can isolate DX because we'll need it
2:39:36in step three DX = du/ 2x as we'll see
2:39:40this is why we always end up dividing
2:39:42the integrant by the derivative of our
2:39:44choice for
2:39:45U step three is to rewrite the integral
2:39:48and remove X X we have the integral of
2:39:514X e to the U since we substituted U for
2:39:54x^2 and we'll replace DX with du over 2x
2:39:58from step two well we still have some
2:40:01x's but due to our careful choice for
2:40:03you and our for knowledge that we would
2:40:05divide by its derivative 2x the X's
2:40:08cancel out nicely 4X over 2x is 2 so we
2:40:11have the integral of 2 e to the U du
2:40:15well this is great we don't have any X's
2:40:17left and the U substitution method
2:40:18resulted in an integral that's much
2:40:20easier than the one we started with
2:40:22that's the point of U substitution make
2:40:25a choice for you that results in a
2:40:26simpler integral in terms of U so we can
2:40:30pull the constant 2 out of the integral
2:40:32and get 2 * the integral of e to the U
2:40:35du step four is to integrate with
2:40:38respect to U the integral of e to the U
2:40:41du is e to the U + C this is a
2:40:45definitive property of the exponential
2:40:47function so we have two e the U + C good
2:40:51work but we're not done step five is to
2:40:54replace U with our chosen X function
2:40:57which was
2:40:58x^2 so we end up with 2 e to x^2 + C and
2:41:04that's our integral the answer to our
2:41:06original integration problem it's easy
2:41:08to check our work by taking the
2:41:10derivative of the integral which I'll do
2:41:12at full speed using the chain rule since
2:41:14the derivative with respect to U of K e
2:41:17to the U is k e to the U
2:41:19that's the same definitive property of
2:41:21the exponential function but in reverse
2:41:24the derivative of 2 e to x^2 is 2 e to
2:41:27x^2 and by the chain rule we need to
2:41:30multiply by the derivative of x^2 which
2:41:32is 2X and the derivative of the constant
2:41:35C is zero so we ends up with 4 x e to
2:41:40x^2 in review We integrated 4X e to the
2:41:44x^2 using U substitution then to check
2:41:46our work we took the derivative of the
2:41:48integral and got back 4X e to x^2 that
2:41:52we started with so we have confidence
2:41:54that our integral was correct you can
2:41:57think of U substitution as applying the
2:41:59chain rule for derivatives in
2:42:04reverse the last major topic we'll cover
Integration by parts
2:42:06for integration is the technique called
2:42:08integration by parts again the big idea
2:42:11is that we're going to replace an
2:42:12integral that's hard to integrate with
2:42:15one that's easier to
2:42:17integrate you can think of integ ation
2:42:19by Parts is applying the product rule
2:42:21for derivatives in Reverse as a reminder
2:42:24here's the product rule for
2:42:27derivatives by calculus convention the
2:42:29function names u and v are almost
2:42:31universally used to illustrate
2:42:33integration by parts I'm not exactly
2:42:35sure why but I'll adopt the convention
2:42:38so we're exposed to the norm and it's
2:42:40familiar when you see it
2:42:42elsewhere I'm also using a common
2:42:44shorthand where the letters u and v
2:42:46represent functions of X U of x and V
2:42:49ofx and as you might expect U Prime and
2:42:52V Prime represent their derivatives with
2:42:54respect to X it's just a concise way to
2:42:57write equations involving functions
2:43:00without having to write a bunch of
2:43:01parenthesis x's and DXs much simpler the
2:43:04short hand works great as long as it's
2:43:06clear that the equations are about
2:43:08functions and not about
2:43:10variables so the derivative of the
2:43:13product of the two functions u and v is
2:43:15u v prime plus v u prime or as as you
2:43:19might remember the 1 * the derivative of
2:43:21the second plus the second * the
2:43:23derivative of the
2:43:25first we're going to manipulate this
2:43:27equation a bit to illustrate the
2:43:29equation behind the integration by parts
2:43:31technique first let's take the
2:43:33anti-derivative of both sides with
2:43:35respect to
2:43:36X this gives us functions U * V on the
2:43:39left side because taking the
2:43:41anti-derivative undoes the derivative
2:43:44operation we have UV Prime and we'll
2:43:47take its integral with respect to X and
2:43:49the same with Vu Prime so we've taken
2:43:52the integral of both sides of the
2:43:54product rule and everything is
2:43:56balanced let's look at this expression V
2:43:59Prime * DX V Prime remember is DV by DX
2:44:03and DV by DX * DX is just DV and on the
2:44:08other side U Prime is Du by DX DX
2:44:12cancels again and we end up with
2:44:15du so by integrating the product rule
2:44:17equation we can get get for the
2:44:19functions u and v u * V equals the
2:44:22integral of U DV plus the integral of
2:44:26vdu it's usually written to isolate the
2:44:28integral of udv so this is the
2:44:31integration by parts formula and we end
2:44:34up with a product of two functions U * V
2:44:37minus a different integral and ideally
2:44:40the integrand we end up with VD will be
2:44:43easier to integrate than the one we
2:44:45started with udv that's what we're
2:44:48striving for
2:44:49let me show you a popular example that's
2:44:52often used when illustrating the
2:44:53integration by parts technique let's
2:44:56find the integral of x e to the X DX U
2:45:00substitution won't help because our only
2:45:02choice for you is X and that would give
2:45:04us the integral of u e to the U du which
2:45:07is the same integral so we'll try
2:45:09integration by
2:45:11parts the first step is to choose
2:45:13functions for U and DV in this example
2:45:16our integrand is a product of two
2:45:18functions s x and e to the X so we need
2:45:21to choose one to be U and the other will
2:45:24be
2:45:25DV there's the neonic to help make the
2:45:27choice leate l i a t the five letters
2:45:32represent five function types in a
2:45:34special order logarithms inverse trig
2:45:38functions which I'm afraid I don't
2:45:39address in this video it's already so
2:45:42long and I just couldn't cover
2:45:44everything after inverse trig functions
2:45:46comes algebraic functions which you can
2:45:48think think of as pols in fact there's a
2:45:51version of the pneumonic called lipti
2:45:53where the P stands for polom same thing
2:45:57finally trig functions and
2:45:59exponentials essentially the list shows
2:46:01the most difficult function types to
2:46:03integrate at the top and the easiest to
2:46:06integrate at the bottom this is useful
2:46:09because when you look at the integration
2:46:10by parts equation the function we choose
2:46:12for DV will need to be integrated so
2:46:15that we have an expression for V this is
2:46:18because the right hand hand side of the
2:46:19integration by parts equation includes V
2:46:22in fact it's there
2:46:23twice and the function we choose for U
2:46:26will need to be differentiated because
2:46:28we'll need du here so the leat neonic
2:46:32suggests which choices for U and DV you
2:46:35might try first whichever function is
2:46:38lowest on the list is a strong choice
2:46:40for DV since it's easiest to integrate
2:46:43and the object of the integration by
2:46:44parts method is to get an easier
2:46:46integral than the one we started with
2:46:49so let's get back to our problem we're
2:46:51on step one choose U and DV we'll use
2:46:54leat and choose the DV that's easiest to
2:46:56integrate our integrant is x e to X we
2:47:00have a polom x and an exponential e to
2:47:03the X the exponential is the lowest on
2:47:06the list so we'll let DV equal e to X
2:47:10whichever function we choose for DV also
2:47:12gets the differential DX so DV is e to X
2:47:17DX and that leaves u = x the next step
2:47:21is to find du and V because they're
2:47:24referenced in the right hand side of the
2:47:25integration by parts formula I think of
2:47:28a 2X two Grid or checklist that has the
2:47:30two functions from the original integral
2:47:32that we chose as U and
2:47:35DV so now we need du and V we'll find du
2:47:39by differentiating U and we'll find V by
2:47:42integrating DV that should be easy using
2:47:45leat we intentionally chose DV to be
2:47:48easy to integrate Since U equal x du
2:47:51must be DX and DV is e to X DX so V is
2:47:57its integral well yes we certainly chose
2:48:00an easy integral the integral of e to
2:48:02the x is e to the X and that's V we'll
2:48:05include the constant of integration plus
2:48:07C at the end of the problem we won't
2:48:09keep track of it here the last step is
2:48:12to plug everything into the integration
2:48:14by parts
2:48:16formula U is X
2:48:21V is e to
2:48:24x minus the integral of V again it's
2:48:28still e to the
2:48:30X and du is
2:48:33DX so we've used the integration by
2:48:36parts technique to end up with an
2:48:37expression for our original integral
2:48:40that's easier to evaluate that's the
2:48:42objective of integration by parts to
2:48:44turn a harder problem into an easier
2:48:47problem since the integral of e to X DX
2:48:50is just e to x + C the solution to our
2:48:54original integral is x e to x minus E to
2:48:57x + C which we found using integration
2:49:00by
2:49:03parts I'll solve another problem where
2:49:05the integral we come up with the
2:49:07integral of vdu will in turn require
2:49:10another iteration of integration by
2:49:12parts to solve and the integral from
2:49:14that expression May in turn require
2:49:16another iteration the pattern can
2:49:18continue but I don't want to get too far
2:49:20ahead the point is when integration by
2:49:23parts works for integral each successive
2:49:25integral gets simpler and simpler until
2:49:27we get one we can solve you'll see what
2:49:30I mean in the next example I'll try to
2:49:32line things up so you can see what's
2:49:34going on then I'll show an easy tabular
2:49:36way to apply integration by parts to
2:49:38solving integral
2:49:40problems we'll integrate x^2 cine 2x DX
2:49:45step one choose U and DV both functions
2:49:49are easy to integrate but in the leat
2:49:51guide trig functions are below polom so
2:49:54we'll let U equal x^2 and DV = cosine 2X
2:49:58DX next Find Du and V du is the
2:50:02derivative of x^2 so 2x DX V is the
2:50:06integral of DV we need to use U
2:50:09substitution to integrate cine 2x DX but
2:50:12we'll do it in our heads the integral of
2:50:15the cosine of some inner term is s of
2:50:17that inner term and when we use use
2:50:19substitution we need to divide by the
2:50:22derivative of that inner term so V = 12
2:50:27sin
2:50:282x now let's transcribe the right half
2:50:30of the integration by parts
2:50:44equation it starts with U * V the way
2:50:48we've set set up our di tables it'll
2:50:50come in handy later u and v are on this
2:50:52diagonal we multiply and rearrange a
2:50:55little to get 1/2 x^2 sin 2x then
2:50:59according to the integration by parts
2:51:01formula we subtract the integral of VD V
2:51:05and du are here on this horizontal line
2:51:07in our di table for reasons that will
2:51:10become apparent in a moment I'm not
2:51:12going to cancel the 1/2 and two just yet
2:51:15or pull them out of the integral you can
2:51:17do this if you like and solve the
2:51:19problem just fine but I want to show you
2:51:21an interesting and important pattern so
2:51:24the integral we subtract is 1 12 * 2 * X
2:51:27sin 2x DX which is V * du
2:51:32here for the sake of bringing attention
2:51:34to the pattern later let me point out
2:51:36that when we arrange our choices for U
2:51:38and DV on one line then du and V on the
2:51:42next like this that the integration by
2:51:45parts rule says that the integral of
2:51:47this product you B is the integral of
2:51:49the product of these adjacent terms in
2:51:52the table I'm using some new colors to
2:51:54show how the integration by parts
2:51:56equation corresponds to the DI table on
2:51:59the right side of the equation UV is the
2:52:01product of this diagonal and the
2:52:03integral vdu is a product of these
2:52:06adjacent terms on the same horizontal
2:52:09line okay as I hinted earlier we'll need
2:52:12to apply the integration by parts method
2:52:14again to this integral but let's take a
2:52:16second to point out that the first term
2:52:1812x^2 sin 2x is part of the solution to
2:52:22our original problem so let's not lose
2:52:24track of it we'll treat the integral as
2:52:26a new simpler
2:52:28problem so we need to choose U and DV
2:52:31again for this new integral well we
2:52:34still have a trig Factor sin 2X and a
2:52:36polom factor x although the polom factor
2:52:40got simpler from x^2 to X so we're
2:52:43making progress please let's notice that
2:52:45on the pink box we have the exact
2:52:47factors that contributed to this
2:52:49integral
2:52:51VD so if you'll bear with me I'm going
2:52:53to use those exact terms for U and DV U
2:52:57=
2:52:592X and DV = 12 sin 2x DX I did move the
2:53:04DX over to DV since we'll be integrating
2:53:07it now we determine du and V du is 2 DX
2:53:13and DV is the integral of 12 sin 2x this
2:53:18require use substitution we'll do it in
2:53:20our heads again the integral of sin 2x
2:53:23is cosine 2X and we need to divide by
2:53:27the derivative of 2x which is 2 so we
2:53:30have 12 * cosine 2X / 2 which is /4
2:53:36cosine
2:53:382X now we have all four values for the
2:53:41second integration by parts equation so
2:53:43we plug them in U * V is this diagonal
2:53:47and simplifies to
2:53:4912x cosine 2X minus the integral of vdu
2:53:53which is this horizontal product that
2:53:55simplifies to - 12 cosine 2X
2:53:59DX these two negatives cancel and now we
2:54:03have an even simpler integral but before
2:54:05we turn our attention to it let's note
2:54:07that we have another part of our
2:54:08solution here the UV part negative 12x
2:54:12cine 2x so we don't want to lose track
2:54:15of it
2:54:16either the last integral is easy enough
2:54:19to do with you substitution first let's
2:54:21pull the constant out of the
2:54:23integral the integral of cosine 2X is
2:54:26sin 2X and we need to divide by the
2:54:29derivative of 2x so altoe we get 1/4 sin
2:54:332X and that's the last part of the
2:54:36solution so we have our original problem
2:54:39the integral of x^2 cine 2x DX we
2:54:43applied the integration by parts method
2:54:45twice and came up with three distinct
2:54:47terms that will make up our solution but
2:54:50we need to be very careful with our
2:54:51positive negative signs because of this
2:54:54subtraction in the integration by parts
2:54:56formula let's step through slowly and
2:54:59deliberately then I'll show you a
2:55:00tabular method that will keep track for
2:55:02us we began solving the problem with the
2:55:05integration by parts method and got this
2:55:07expression the positive UV term that we
2:55:10noted was part of our solution minus a
2:55:12new simpler integral so 12 x^2 sin 2X
2:55:18next we subtracted this new simpler
2:55:20integral and when we used the
2:55:22integration by parts technique it also
2:55:25had a UV
2:55:26term 12x cosine 2X since we're
2:55:30subtracting a negative the result for
2:55:32our solution expression is positive 12x
2:55:36cosine 2X and finally we have this last
2:55:39integral and that evaluated to a
2:55:41positive expression but remember we're
2:55:43subtracting this entire integral so the
2:55:46next to last term in our solution
2:55:47integral is NE 1/4 sin 2x as with all
2:55:52indefinite integrals the very last term
2:55:54is plus C don't
2:55:56forget and so we've solved a moderately
2:55:59complex integral using integration by
2:56:01parts twice now I'm going to show you
The DI method for using integration by parts
2:56:04the DI method for integration by parts
2:56:07which is especially helpful for problems
2:56:09that require multiple iterations of the
2:56:11integration by parts technique it's the
2:56:14same math as setting up repeated
2:56:16integration by parts equations it's just
2:56:18organized into a table for us I kind of
2:56:21hinted at it with the color coding
2:56:23earlier but now I'll show the full
2:56:24method we start again by identifying U
2:56:27and DV but we write them under columns
2:56:29labeled D and i d stands for
2:56:33differentiate and we'll put the value
2:56:34for U underneath the I stands for
2:56:37integrate and we'll put the value for DV
2:56:40underneath you can still use the lat
2:56:43guidelines to help you choose your
2:56:44candidates for U and
2:56:46DV next write a a plus sign to the left
2:56:49of this row and in the next row we
2:56:51haven't filled it in yet put a negative
2:56:54sign these will help us keep track of
2:56:56the switching signs due to that pesky
2:56:58subtraction in the integration by parts
2:57:01formula now as you might expect we
2:57:03differentiate the D column the
2:57:05derivative of x^2 is 2X and we'll
2:57:08integrate the I column 12 sin
2:57:122x now we saw this earlier but let me
2:57:15emphasize that the integration by parts
2:57:17formula can be read from the grid this
2:57:19integral of U DV equals this product U *
2:57:23V minus this integral
2:57:26VD horizontal products represent
2:57:28integrand udv on top dvu directly
2:57:32beneath the diagonal product is not an
2:57:34integral it's just U * V it's a tabular
2:57:38representation of the integration by
2:57:40parts
2:57:41formula since the bottom line of our
2:57:43table is an integral we can repeat the
2:57:46steps we differentiate the D column and
2:57:49get 2 we integrate the I column and get
2:57:521/4 cosine 2X the positive negative sign
2:57:56for this integral switches back to
2:57:58positive since we're now two layers deep
2:58:00subtracting integrals the signs in the
2:58:03left column will alternate between plus
2:58:05and minus for however many times we
2:58:08iterate let's go one more time the
2:58:10derivative of two is 0 and the integral
2:58:13of - 1/4 cosine 2X is -8 sin 2X X and
2:58:19this line gets a negative sign we can
2:58:21now read the answer to the original
2:58:23Green integral directly from the DI
2:58:26table the integral of x^2 cine 2x is
2:58:30equal to this diagonal product 12 x^2
2:58:33sin 2x minus this diagonal product the
2:58:37sign is negative because we subtract the
2:58:39integral in the integration of by Parts
2:58:41equation but one of the factors is
2:58:43negative so when we subtract a negative
2:58:45the result is positive and we get Plus
2:58:4812x cosine
2:58:502X then we add this diagonal product we
2:58:54add because we're now two layers deep
2:58:56into the integration by parts formula
2:58:58and the latest subtraction is already
2:59:00inside the one above it there's a factor
2:59:02with a negative sign though so we end up
2:59:04subtracting 1/4 sin 2x we don't need to
2:59:08go any further the next product would be
2:59:10zero because of this zero and with plus
2:59:12C we're done we get the same answer as
2:59:15when we did integration by parts step
2:59:18step by
2:59:19step please don't think this is a new
2:59:21different or magical way to solve
2:59:23integration by parts problems all the
2:59:25numbers are the same all the steps are
2:59:27the same it's just that some smart
2:59:29person noticed that when we put the
2:59:31steps in a table the results are easy to
2:59:36read I mentioned at the beginning of the
2:59:39video that becoming proficient at
2:59:41calculus requires practice I intended
2:59:44for this video to provide a visually
2:59:46engaging graphical overview of calculus
2:59:48and its fundamental principles and rules
2:59:51and I hope it was interesting and
2:59:52enlightening to you but if you're a
2:59:54calculus student or going to become one
2:59:56you need more in the description I've
2:59:59linked to several videos by Steve Chow
3:00:01whose main YouTube channel is called
3:00:03black pen red pen he's the go-to source
3:00:06for worked out calculus problems and in
3:00:09particular he has long form videos where
3:00:11he works out 100 derivatives and two
3:00:14others where he works out 100 integrals
3:00:16each they're great videos and have
3:00:18millions of views you'll do yourself a
3:00:20favor by checking out his
3:00:23channels thank you very much for
3:00:25watching we've covered a lot of material
3:00:27it's almost everything you'd cover in a
3:00:29firste calculus course I hope you found
3:00:31this video and its style to be helpful
3:00:34and informative I'm Dennis Davis take
3:00:37care and good luck with your studies