Free YouTube Transcribe

Video transcript

SS Lecture 7 v1

Shelby Solomon · 11,645 words · 53 min read

Want to search this transcript, jump the video from any line, or download it as TXT, SRT, or VTT?

Open in the transcript tool

Full transcript

0:00hi and welcome today we are going to be

0:03covering corporate

0:04strategy and with corporate strategy

0:07we're going to be moving on from

0:09discussing how a single business

0:12competes in an industry to how a

0:16corporation manages their entire

0:18portfolio of businesses all right so

0:21that they can build off of each other

0:24and gain from operating as a

0:28set so one of the main thingses we'll be

0:31hitting on in this lecture is

0:33diversification all right how

0:35diversification can build shareholder

0:37value um the idea of cross business

0:40strategic fit all right if you're

0:43diversifying ideally you should be

0:46diversifying into some industry that

0:48fits with your focal firm we'll also

0:52talk about some of the merits and risk

0:54of unrelated diversification yeah there

0:57really are more risks than merits but

0:58we'll discuss them

1:00we'll go over a couple tools for

1:02evaluating a diversification strategy

1:05and we'll talk about some options you

1:08have as a uh Diversified company that it

1:11can employ to improve its

1:15performance so when crafting a

1:17diversification strategy it deals with

1:20step one picking a new industry to enter

1:23all right step two well what are the

1:25opportunities within this industry you

1:28know how well are they going to fit all

1:30right so pursuing ones that fit with

1:33your uh current set of resources and

1:36businesses in your portfolio and then

1:38step three is

1:40post acquisition trying to find ways to

1:44fit those organizations together in such

1:48a way that the uh combined you know

1:51firms work better together than they

1:54would

1:56individually so a firm should consider

1:59diversifying

2:00when either of these two scenarios pop

2:03up one there's just limited growth

2:05opportunities in the current market all

2:08right the industry's already matured

2:10they kind of found all of the angles to

2:13uh you know improve their their current

2:16company and product and are looking for

2:18growth elsewhere so for example like

2:21tobacco okay Altria or Philip morus or

2:24whatever they're going by now um sells

2:28tobacco and they've kind of figured out

2:31all of the angles okay for how to pack

2:36cigarettes and give cigarettes to

2:37customers all right and give people

2:39cancer and whatever okay um they've sort

2:43of nailed that business down to be as

2:45efficient as possible in terms of

2:47getting that tobacco rolling it up

2:50packaging it I mean there's laws on how

2:52much they can advertise and all these

2:54other things so they've sort of

2:57rationalized that segment of their

2:59business business as far as they

3:00possibly can so what Philip Morris does

3:03now is they go and they acquire other

3:06businesses okay um or Altria or whatever

3:10they're calling themselves so they'll

3:12acquire other businesses with the extra

3:14cash that they have on hand um

3:17sometimes stockholders don't necessarily

3:20want a dividend for tax purposes and

3:22things like that and it just makes more

3:24sense to have that excess cash flow

3:26instead of it just sitting around as

3:27cash try to put it to work and some uh

3:31productive means and mergers and

3:33Acquisitions can be one of those at one

3:35point uh I believe they owned Nabisco so

3:39they were selling two really addictive

3:41products between cigarettes and Oreos uh

3:45was the joke that people would always

3:46make anyway the second scenario deals

3:50with changing industry conditions okay

3:53so there's other situations when you

3:55want to consider

3:57diversifying when you're running up

3:59against a situation where the industry

4:02is just changing there's disruptive

4:04technology um there's other substitute

4:07products those kinds of things are

4:09starting to make you obsolete all right

4:11so you can think about like cable

4:13networks

4:15uh they realize that okay cable TV is

4:20you know been losing a lot of ground to

4:22streaming channels and a lot of those

4:25networks have realized okay we need to

4:27make our own streaming Channel all right

4:29so you have Discovery makes disco Plus

4:32or whatever

4:34um Paramount's kind of gotten all the

4:37content from all of its different

4:39television channels and pulled it

4:41together on its parent on its streaming

4:43Channel and offers that but you can look

4:45at all of the different networks that

4:47are on cable and they're all sort of

4:50scrambling to find different ways to get

4:52their content uh available to customers

4:55through streaming uh as a way to sort of

4:58hedge their bets for when you know it

5:00seems like cable is slowly dying out all

5:02right it's being made obsolete to uh

5:06other platforms for watching television

5:08and

5:12programming there's some different

5:14strategic diversification possibilities

5:16one is you could expand into a business

5:20where the Technologies and products

5:22compl your current line of business okay

5:25so for example Amazon started off

5:28originally just selling books

5:30okay

5:32um and that was their whole thing is you

5:35know they were the world's largest

5:37bookstore uh they happen to be online

5:40though well one of the things and they

5:43still do sell a whole lot of books but

5:44one of the the things that Jeff basos

5:46started to realize with with selling

5:48books was you know there's some barriers

5:51to uh transporting books you know it's

5:54costly to transport them they clutter up

5:57people's houses different things like

5:58that with books um so he really was

6:01thinking like how can I make it more

6:03convenient for people to own books and

6:05read books um you know there's got to be

6:07some technology that can help us to uh

6:10deliver our core product in a way that's

6:13more convenient uh to the

6:15customer and they started working on

6:18building the original sorts of like

6:20Kindle readers so you could read books

6:22online through uh tablets um and so

6:27that's how they started diversifying

6:28into producing ing

6:30that that product that was very

6:33different from what Amazon had always

6:35done in the past which in the past

6:37Amazon had only just you know sold other

6:40stuff they weren't making anything

6:41themselves but then they Diversified

6:44into this uh line of business of

6:46producing these Kindle readers um where

6:49they were making something themselves

6:50all

6:52right other situations that where it

6:54makes sense is like finding Industries

6:57where you can just deploy current

7:00resource base so Honda for example uh

7:04we've discussed this before but they

7:06start out making motorcycles and cars

7:09and now they make a lot of other things

7:11but all of the other things that Honda

7:13makes are always based around Small

7:16Engines okay so Honda can make a really

7:18really good

7:20reliable uh powerful tiny engine all

7:23right and those they realize that can be

7:25used in a car it can be used in a

7:28motorcycle it can be used in a lawn

7:31mower all right it could be used in a

7:33generator there's a lot of different

7:35possibilities that they figured out for

7:38deploying that particular resource and

7:40capability they have in producing

7:43highquality Small

7:47Engines other situations uh

7:49opportunities for diversifying is if you

7:52can find ways to sort of share different

7:56resources and capabilities across

7:58businesses okay so you know you can look

8:01at like Fredo all right you need a fleet

8:05of trucks if you want to ship Pepsi you

8:08need a fleet Fleet of trucks if you want

8:09to ship Doritos all right you can sort

8:12of expand into those other lines of

8:14business and use that Fleet of trucks

8:17and share it between those two companies

8:19all right you could also share like

8:21marketing teams all right maybe it's

8:23similar to

8:24Market things like Pepsi just as it is

8:27to Market I all right a similar design

8:31team would would be really good at doing

8:33both all right but in any event the idea

8:37here is that you can bring down the

8:39internal cost by sharing different

8:42resources and capabilities between two

8:46different business units under the same

8:50Corporation another sort of economy of

8:53scope if you will and that's kind of

8:55what we're touching on

8:57here is some sometimes you can share a

9:00strong brand name all right onto other

9:04products okay so the idea is if you

9:07acquire somebody um and you already have

9:11a really strong brand name then perhaps

9:14your brand name and your loyalty and

9:17reputation will precede you and whatever

9:20company you just purchased will now be

9:23seen as being tied to you and it

9:26will have similar success

9:29okay

9:31so these are the sort of four strategic

9:35diversification

9:38possibilities now there's some different

9:40tests for whether or not it makes sense

9:43to

9:44diversify one really quick thing before

9:47we get into these tests you should only

9:49ever

9:50diversify

9:53if it seems like you are going to build

9:55shareholder value in such a way that the

9:58shareholders cannot capture this same

10:01particular value through portfolio

10:03investing all right so what I mean by

10:06that is the only time you should ever

10:08engage in

10:10diversification entering into new lines

10:12of business is is if it seems

10:18like the your company will do better as

10:21a result of running those two businesses

10:24separately or or together then those two

10:28businesses could be run separately from

10:30each other all right and that they have

10:33to be managed in such a way where

10:36they're co-mingled and sharing

10:38resources

10:40otherwise uh it makes sense for you just

10:43to invest in the other company and not

10:45actually bring it under your own

10:48corporate umbrella

10:51okay so the test you can go through to

10:55to sort of think through this will it

10:57build shareholder value through

11:00diversification is one is it in an

11:03attractive industry all right so if

11:06you're looking to

11:07diversify one thing you want to ask

11:09yourself is okay is the company I'm

11:12looking at

11:14purchasing in an attractive industry and

11:16you can do this through Porters 5 forces

11:19of course all right so you want to make

11:20sure you're not buying companies and

11:23industries that are dying or

11:24unattractive all right the next question

11:27to ask yourself is well what's the cost

11:29of Entry um uh is the price of this

11:33company so high that there's not going

11:35to be any meat left on the bone for me

11:37or is there such high barriers to enter

11:40into this industry all right um through

11:43internal development

11:46that I'm going to have to be running

11:48this thing for 15 years before I start

11:50to break even okay those are the that's

11:53another question you might want to ask

11:55yourself that comes with sort of a a

11:58catch 22 because because if it's cheap

11:59to enter then you got to imagine that

12:02that's an industry that has a high

12:03threat of entry and we all know a high

12:07threat of Entry means that it's probably

12:08an unprofitable industry but

12:12um you know still something to consider

12:15I mean of course if you're not going to

12:17the profits aren't going to materialize

12:19Without You operating for many years

12:21then that's a waste of your time

12:25too and the next one which is perhaps

12:28the most important one is you know the

12:30better off test okay how much

12:33Synergy uh will be gained by

12:35diversifying into this industry how much

12:38better off will both of these companies

12:41be as a result of working together than

12:44they would be separately okay then they

12:47could be run separately under different

12:55ownership so the idea of synergy is

12:59essentially what we're referring to here

13:02is if there's Synergy it means you know

13:04you put business one with business 2 you

13:07know one and one doesn't equal just two

13:10one and one equals three all right when

13:14there's a Synergy you know the two

13:16things operate more efficiently and more

13:18effectively together than they would be

13:21separate all

13:23right

13:25so an example of this this is like

13:28another term for for economy of scope

13:30all right so like you run into examples

13:33of this in Industries where it's normal

13:37for one company to be involved in

13:39multiple lines of business okay so like

13:41banks for example at one point Banks

13:44just did Savings and Loans okay you had

13:47a savings account and they would also

13:49loan out money and how it worked is

13:51people would deposit money in a savings

13:53account and the bank would protect that

13:55money and whatever else so of course

13:57you'd like to put your money into a

14:00savings account they might give you a

14:01tiny bit of interest on it too so it's

14:04better than just keeping it under your

14:05mattress and what the bank would do is

14:08then they would loan that money out to

14:11uh other customers and they would loan

14:14that money out at an interest rate that

14:16was greater than they were giving people

14:18on their savings account and they'd make

14:20money on the

14:21Arbitrage

14:23okay um now they realized okay well if

14:27we're making loans we have to vet these

14:29people were loaning our money to uh to

14:31make sure they don't run off with it

14:33so you need a certain type of

14:36infrastructure to vet people to see if

14:39their credit is worthy and everything

14:41else all right for the

14:43loans also if you're going to be storing

14:46a great sums of money in a building you

14:48need a vault and all these different

14:50things to protect it well then you also

14:53need you know customer service and

14:55everything else to serve your customers

14:57as they come in and start making these

14:59transactions with you so you need this

15:02certain particular set of resources

15:05already just to do Ser Savings and Loans

15:08and what banks found out is okay well

15:10actually it's more

15:12efficient uh if we don't just do Savings

15:14and Loans if we expand into offering

15:17other products okay if maybe we start

15:21selling home mortgages

15:23okay you can use a lot of the same types

15:27of um resources can be repurposed to do

15:30home

15:31mortgages or a lot of uh the same

15:35resources can be repurposed to offer

15:38credit cards or do different things uh

15:41offer different other Financial products

15:43okay and this is sort of the case of

15:47synergy you know it's more efficient for

15:51One bank to offer credit cards do home

15:54mortgages Savings and Loans and you know

15:58sell life insurance and whatever else

16:00banks are up to um then it is for there

16:05to be multiple companies that specialize

16:08and do each of those because then they

16:09have to duplicate the infrastructure

16:11every time okay so that's the idea of

16:15synergy it's more efficient to bring

16:17multiple activities under one house

16:19because they can share resources and

16:21everything than it is for them to

16:23specialize and operate independently

16:26because then there there's a lot of

16:27things that are redundant

16:29okay and they're less efficient that

16:34way so you again you want to diversify

16:38when you believe there's some sort of

16:40synergy okay so diversification can take

16:45a few different uh approaches you can

16:48diversify into related

16:50businesses you can diversify into

16:52unrelated businesses and you can get

16:55into a mix of different type of

16:57businesses okay obvious right

17:00right so how do you diversify well

17:03there's a really just three ways okay to

17:07enter into a new industry all right you

17:09can make buy or Ally all right make buy

17:14or lie so what I mean well if let's say

17:18for

17:19example you wanted to enter into the

17:22coffee industry all right one way is you

17:25could make a new Cofe Coffee Company

17:28okay you could start up a new

17:30business the other way is you could buy

17:33up an existing Coffee Company all right

17:36you could engage in an

17:37acquisition and the Third Way is you

17:39could ally with somebody you could

17:42partner with a current coffee shop all

17:46right and work together with them and

17:49enter the industry that way so if you

17:52want to diversify into a new line of

17:54business or you want to start producing

17:56something new make buy or out those are

17:59the three ways you can enter into

18:02Industries or

18:03startup uh different product

18:09lines now each of them comes with their

18:11own advantages and disadvantages okay

18:15Acquisitions quick all right you avoid

18:18barriers well sort of you still have to

18:21pay the price and to buy an indust to

18:24buy a company in an industry with high

18:26barriers dentry the price is going to be

18:28high high so I

18:30mean there's that barrier but you don't

18:33have to deal with say the uh regulations

18:37or those other types of barriers you may

18:41encounter um and you might also access

18:44some compliment resources really quick

18:46too the disadvantages of course you know

18:49you're going to have to pay a premium

18:52all right for a successful firm unless

18:55you want to go shopping in The Bargain

18:57Bin for damaged goods

19:00you're often going to underestimate the

19:02cost okay this

19:05happens to the best of us all

19:09right um or you'll which is essentially

19:13the same thing overestimate the

19:15potential for this acquisition to add

19:18shareholder

19:21value so

19:24diversification uh by acquisition again

19:27you know quick entry

19:29access to complimentary resources and

19:32capabilities but let's try an imaginary

19:34acquisition and see how well it actually

19:36works

19:37out okay so let's pretend we're going to

19:40go acquire a business all

19:43right now people place a whole bunch of

19:46bids for this business all right and

19:48we're going to bid what we think is

19:49going to be uh we're going to bid about

19:53what we think it's worth to us

19:56okay so

19:58we we place our bid and this is the same

20:01process you go through if you're buying

20:02a house or anything else you know you

20:05look at the value of it you ask experts

20:08what they think it's worth but then

20:09ultimately you come up with your own bid

20:11based on what it's worth to you so you

20:13go ahead and pay place that

20:16bid all right

20:19so what often happens is you fall victim

20:22to What's called the Winner's

20:24curse and how this how the Winner's

20:28curse works works is we develop our bids

20:30as I was saying based on the target

20:32values

20:34uh based on our own imperfect

20:37information about the

20:39target we all submit our bids based on

20:41our evaluations and what's going to

20:44happen is there's going to be some

20:46people who are bang on the money they

20:48really estimate the actual value of

20:52whatever this business is worth okay

20:54pretty accurately a lot of people will

20:56sort of be pretty close to guessing the

21:00actual value of the the business or

21:02whatever assets being purchased now

21:05there's going to be some people who way

21:07underbid the value of it all

21:10right and there's going to be some

21:13person out there who way over estimates

21:16the value of that firm all right one

21:19corporation's going to place a bid

21:21that's really really optimistic um and

21:25by optimistic I mean wrong and

21:27overestimate ating the value of this

21:31business and what happens is anytime you

21:34go through these bidding

21:36processes the only bid that matters is

21:39who's the most wrong in overvaluing The

21:42Firm all right all of the other bids are

21:45inconsequential if you don't get the

21:47business um if you weigh under bid

21:50that's inconsequential it doesn't matter

21:52the only person who's affected is the

21:55person who over bids and is the most

21:57optimistic in wrong in terms of

22:00overvaluing the firm so what happens

22:06is usually the shareholders of the firm

22:09that's being bid on the

22:11target take a huge b a huge you know

22:15windfall gain all right they get a lot

22:17of cash usually from that uh people buy

22:20up their stock or if it's like a

22:22independent firm you know the owners of

22:24that company uh get a huge payday and go

22:28their separate way but the acquir has

22:32usually over overpaid for this business

22:35and and uh what we say is they they won

22:38but they're cursed okay um yes they got

22:42the the business but also they probably

22:44overpaid in the process and that's often

22:47the problem with acquiring businesses as

22:50you run into this winner Winner's curse

22:53so again disadvantages well the cost of

22:56the acquisition you under estimate you

22:59know how difficult it's going to be to

23:01after you pay a hefty fee for it you

23:05underestimate how costly it'll be to

23:07integrate this business with your

23:09existing firm um and you know you

23:13overestimate how much potential

23:16shareholder value can be uh added by

23:20purchasing another

23:23company all right there's a handful of

23:26advantages with uh

23:29developing a new line of business in

23:31house rather than trying to acquire

23:34somebody one of them is it avoids all

23:37the uncertainties and pitfalls and

23:39everything that go into making an

23:40acquisition you don't have to worry

23:42about the Winner's curse you don't have

23:43to worry about trying to blend these

23:46multiple cultures

23:48together and sometimes they're just not

23:51businesses to acquire so again in that

23:54situation it can be helpful too if

23:55there's nobody to buy up it's a newer

23:58emerging industry it makes sense just to

24:01develop your own line all right so you

24:04can think about like early on with uh

24:07streaming platforms you know if you

24:09wanted to compete with Netflix it wasn't

24:10like it was all that easy just to buy up

24:12a competitor you kind of had to build

24:15your own streaming

24:17platform there's a number of different

24:20disadvantages also with corporate

24:21entrepreneurship as they call it it's

24:23kind of like when a corporation's an

24:25entrepreneur okay um

24:29one is you have to overcome barriers to

24:31entry all right so you know you're

24:34building up this thing from the ground

24:35up you're going to have to deal with all

24:37of those regulations um you're going to

24:41have to deal with building a proper uh

24:44plant that deals with economies of scale

24:47and everything else so you have barri

24:49your sturry to

24:51consider it also requires a whole lot in

24:54terms of like your your startup in terms

24:57of developing all those

24:59productive capacities and capabilities

25:02and everything you're starting from the

25:05very beginning so there's a whole lot of

25:08things you're going to have to do and

25:10that's very expensive and time

25:14consuming and then there's other times

25:16where you might just fall victim to

25:19people not wanting to change or wanting

25:21this company to move in this new

25:23Direction so there's a lot of different

25:26disadvantage of it also n n of these

25:28strategies are perfect of course there

25:31are some situations that tend to favor

25:34internal

25:35development so some of them are if it's

25:39a industry where you're not going to

25:41have to worry about incumbents trying to

25:44retaliate against you okay you don't

25:46have to deal with predatory pricing or

25:48anything like that all right these are

25:51typically Industries where there's uh

25:53sort of growing demand still at the time

25:56okay which uh often implies that it's a

25:59new industry or an emerging

26:01industry if you have a lot of time to

26:04develop okay internally developing

26:07launching your own new line of business

26:09that's always going to be the slowest

26:11approach so you need time if time's of

26:14the essence don't do

26:16it uh also if you have the skills in

26:19house that you think you could take on

26:22this endeavor um if you have some

26:24experience in doing you know tactics

26:27similar to this then that might make it

26:30more worth your while than

26:32not uh of course if the cost of Entry is

26:35going to be more expensive than

26:36internally developing I mean obvious

26:39right uh and then also there's times

26:43when you want to look at the um with

26:46Industries

26:47okay when you add a new firm into the

26:50industry what happens is that new firm

26:52brings its own Supply okay its own

26:56amount of goods there's now more Goods

26:58in this industry being P being produced

27:01because there's this new firm operating

27:03in there and when you throw in a new

27:07firm if it's a really large firm and it

27:09actually makes uh a meaningful

27:12contribution to the quantity being

27:15supplied within the industry then what

27:17can happen is it shifts Supply and when

27:19Supply shifts that has the effect of

27:22bringing down prices okay so there's

27:27some Industries out out

27:28there where um like let's say commercial

27:33aircrafts all right you basically have

27:36Boeing and Airbus okay um if you were to

27:41add a third commercial aircraft producer

27:45in there that was producing on the same

27:46scale as Boeing and air Airbus happen is

27:50this would dramatically decrease the

27:52price of commercial

27:53aircrafts um and it would probably make

27:56it uh unprofitable to even sell those

28:00things all right so if you were looking

28:02to enter into that industry you really

28:05wouldn't want to be launching a new line

28:08you wouldn't want to be developing you

28:10know a new business that's going to

28:11bring its Supply into that industry what

28:13would be the better way would be to

28:15acquire one of those two companies which

28:17would be astronomically expensive and

28:20that way you don't upset the balance of

28:22supply and

28:26demand so joint venture

28:28are of course you know the other option

28:31you have and these can be advantageous

28:33at times um if you're ever dealing with

28:37a situation where you're looking at you

28:40know pursuing an opportunity but it's

28:42too large complex difficult or risky for

28:46one firm to pursue Al loone then you

28:49know you can share the risk by bringing

28:51in some Partners okay so like when uh a

28:55lot of the major Network companies

28:57wanted to compete with um Netflix and

29:00launch streaming

29:02platforms they were looking at it like

29:05well this is a new industry okay we

29:08don't know if people are really going to

29:10be streaming content online and watching

29:12it that way or what's going to happen

29:14this was a long time ago okay well a

29:16long time ago was in like whatever 2007

29:20is um and they weren't exactly sure

29:24which way the industry was going to go a

29:25lot of those big networks wanted to

29:29um try to compete with Netflix in some

29:31way and launch a streaming uh Channel

29:34but they weren't exactly sure what was

29:35going to happen so what happened is all

29:38of them sort of banded together all

29:40right and formed the uh joint venture

29:43Hulu so Hulu is a combination of

29:47fox

29:49uh Disney NBC bunch of other media

29:53companies okay and what they figured is

29:56okay well we can all split up the risk

29:59by launching this separate entity from

30:01us all called Hulu will'll split up the

30:04profits that Hulu

30:06um produces and distributed amongst each

30:09other by uh ownership all right so

30:13that's how Hulu works and sort of how it

30:15came about at the time it was a little

30:17bit too risky but all those companies

30:19realized oh we can share the risk by

30:21baning together and launching uh a joint

30:26venture there's some opportunities that

30:29might just require a really broad range

30:31of competencies okay that not any single

30:34firm has at the time and in those types

30:37of situations it makes sense to have two

30:41companies come together and start um and

30:46and work together okay because you have

30:48one company that's has one set of

30:50strengths another has a complimentary

30:53set of strengths they work together and

30:56they can

30:59um do a lot of things that they couldn't

31:01on their own and that would be very very

31:04difficult and costly for them to acquire

31:06those capabilities on their own and then

31:08in certain situations there's some

31:10countries that won't let you do business

31:12in their

31:14borders unless you are uh at least

31:19partnered with a domestic

31:21company all right so like I believe in

31:26China if you want to operate a company

31:29out of China as an American what you

31:32have to do is you have to partner with

31:35another company that's uh domestic to

31:39China and then if you have a partnership

31:42then you can operate there but you can't

31:45just start one as a foreigner over there

31:48um so in situations like that you'll

31:51have companies that will want to partner

31:54with uh domestic all right

32:00there's a number of different risk also

32:02with joint ventures too

32:08um you you're you're working with

32:10somebody that might not share your

32:12vision all right so you never really

32:14know how well people buy into the dream

32:17as much as you do all right you might

32:19have one particular idea as to what

32:21you're trying to do

32:24and trying to create and he might be

32:27talking to your Venture partner and they

32:30may seem to be a agreeing with it and go

32:32along with it but they have wildly

32:34different expectations for the

32:38objectives and level of value creation

32:40and what the end goal is than you and

32:43you sort of slowly figure this out as

32:45you work with them all right that can be

32:48sort of a unfortunate

32:51situation um so like I mean and you run

32:54into this and doing a lot of things when

32:56you collaborate with other people I can

32:58remember once when I was uh when I was

33:01in college buying a motorcycle with a

33:04buddy and saying like yeah we'll fix

33:06this thing up and you know we could

33:08share it or sell it or whatever I don't

33:11know but yeah let's buy this non-running

33:13motorcycle and fix it up because that's

33:15seemed like a fun idea and I remember

33:18the guy was like yeah we'll like really

33:20restore it and and same thing I was

33:22saying but once we start working on it

33:25he's trying to cut every corner it's

33:26like well it's only 10 temporary so you

33:28know who cares if it's a piece of junk

33:31and it's like yeah this was a bad really

33:33bad decision I ended up having to to buy

33:36him out of

33:37it um but anyways that's the same type

33:41of stuff you run into with launching

33:42these businesses you never really know

33:45what your partner's going to be like

33:46until you start really working with

33:48them so you have these disagreements

33:52conflicting objectives cultural clashes

33:55between the two partners um

33:58and it's hard to say what each company

34:00is expecting out of it and what how

34:03those cultures will will mesh together

34:05you know when you have lowcost people

34:07working with you know those who Target

34:10sort of the highend or

34:12whatever really hard to figure out how

34:14they're going to work together until you

34:16actually start doing it and it can sort

34:18of fall apart that way um and at times

34:22you know you have one partner like me

34:24with my motorcycle where you just get

34:25fed up and say oh I'll I'll buy you out

34:28and I'm done with this uh or somebody

34:30else tries to go their own way

34:33so there's a a lot of opportunities for

34:37failure with joint ventures

34:41too so for choosing your mode of Market

34:44entry there's a number of different

34:46questions you might ask yourself okay um

34:49one is do you have the resources and

34:52capabilities to do it on your own or do

34:54you need somebody all right the other is

34:58what types of barriers to entry are

35:00there um very low barriers to entry then

35:04might make sense to do it alone okay um

35:08another question is of course going to

35:09be

35:11speed

35:12how quick does this need to happen all

35:15right is it a passing

35:17opportunity um do you really need to

35:21gain access to this new line of business

35:23right away if so then acquiring

35:26somebody's going to make more sense or

35:27trying to partner with

35:29somebody and then of course lastly and

35:33maybe the first thing you should

35:34consider is just what's going to be the

35:35least costly mode of Entry uh given your

35:38objectives and the answer as far as

35:41which is going to be the least costly is

35:43probably going to depend on these prior

35:45three questions you know if you have the

35:48resources there's low barriers to entry

35:51and times not necessarily working

35:54against you then

35:57might be cheapest just to internally

36:00develop um rather than overcoming those

36:03barriers to entry and then on the flip

36:05side if all of those are turned against

36:07you then of course acquiring somebody or

36:09finding a partner is going to be

36:13faster so now we can talk about

36:15diversification in terms of like related

36:18and unrelated okay um so which path to

36:22pursue and related just means like are

36:27you buying companies or are you

36:29expanding into lines of business that

36:30are very similar to what you already do

36:33okay unrelated refers

36:36to getting into new lines of business

36:40that don't share very many underlying

36:43Resources with what you're doing right

36:46now okay so for example like related

36:49would be you know a car

36:53manufacturer starting to make commercial

36:56trucks or

36:59motorcycles

37:00okay still Transportation related you

37:04could see how the underlying resources

37:06that allow you to be a car manufacturer

37:08could be transferred to making

37:10commercial vehicles or uh motorcycles

37:14pretty easily right unrelated would be

37:18something

37:21like oh the kind of stuff like Yamaha

37:25gets into where they make motorcycle

37:28all right and stuff like that ATVs

37:30snowmobiles whatever but they also make

37:33musical instruments okay um you know the

37:39what's the overlap between those

37:41two I don't know I mean I guess they're

37:43both manufacturing a a

37:47uh you know mechanical type of durable

37:50good that needs to be made to certain

37:53specifications but really really

37:55different lines of business

38:00okay and sometimes you can do a little

38:02bit of related and unrelated okay

38:07so what really guides the decision as

38:10far as diversifying inter related

38:13businesses which usually makes more

38:16sense is strategic fit okay that's the

38:19big sort of word for this section you

38:22know how well can you transfer your

38:24specialized expertise and everything

38:27from your current line of business to

38:30another perspective line of business

38:33okay um so there's different ways you

38:38know you can share cost by combining

38:41different value chain related activities

38:44okay so you know maybe

38:46you're like Fredo you already have a set

38:49of trucks and everything for

38:52shipping your soft drinks around and you

38:55could also use that same set of trucks

38:57to ship ship around your

38:59um your your Doritos and that other

39:02stuff too okay you can see all those

39:05would the logistics could easily be

39:07shared all right maybe the marketing

39:09teams you know could also be shared or

39:12accounting there's different ways you

39:13can kind of share different pieces of

39:15the value chain just to save

39:19costs um other opportunities is like

39:23sharing a really well-known brand name

39:26okay so

39:28um you see this every now and then with

39:30companies that feel like they have a you

39:33know a prestigious name all right so

39:36you'll see like I don't

39:40know situations where maybe Alpha Romeo

39:43or Mercedes or somebody makes like a

39:46bicycle okay an actual bicycle all right

39:49and they feel like well you know people

39:51see our vehicles as being sort of

39:55Premium perhaps people will look at the

39:57things like bicycles through the same

39:59lens and be willing to pay that same

40:01premium for these these products all

40:06right or Swiss army knife okay um

40:10companies like wender everybody knows of

40:12those and knows oh yeah Swiss Army

40:14knives are really quality well they

40:16don't really make Swiss Army knives are

40:18probably sort of a small line of their

40:21business I mean now they make like

40:24suitcases and backpacks and other sorts

40:28of travel gear and their expectation is

40:31that well people will think oh this is

40:33the knife I had in Boy Scouts and I

40:35could really count on it now I can count

40:37on some of their other gear for when I'm

40:39traveling and you know it's not going to

40:42break down on me I'll have all these

40:47multifunctions in other situations you

40:50might have uh a case where you know you

40:53can engage in Cross business

40:56collaboration share uh knowledges and

40:59resources okay

41:02so you know what you could have is like

41:06Honda where they make motorcycles and

41:09cars okay um what they learn in like

41:14motorcycle racing uh or or automobile

41:18racing okay that other line of business

41:20that they're also sort of Quasi involved

41:23in their idea is well we can transfer

41:25some of what we've learned from the race

41:27track into making our everyday vehicles

41:30to make them more robust or higher

41:35performance and in terms of

41:38diversification often you might be

41:40pursuing resources or capabilities um

41:44and looking at these resources and

41:45capabilities is something that you can

41:47meld into your own portfolio of

41:49businesses all right and you can kind of

41:51categorize it into two different groups

41:55one would be generalized res resources

41:57and these are things that can be used in

42:00a whole bunch of different Industries so

42:03things like

42:05trucks all right uh accounting

42:08departments can be used in a lot of

42:09different Industries with um you know

42:12maybe the game changes a little bit

42:13industry by industry but in a lot of

42:16cases it's it's skills that can be

42:20shared different things like that um

42:24those General resources these are things

42:26that can be you know leveraged in

42:28related or unrelated

42:31diversification now often what happens

42:33is if you're pursuing those General

42:35resources things like that usually those

42:38are more expensive to acquire because

42:41everybody sees value in them right

42:44away all right everybody sees value in

42:47them right away and usually

42:49they they are fairly expensive um to

42:53purchase and and prices on them get bit

42:56up a lot quicker all

42:58right specialized resources are

43:01resources that have a very specific

43:03application and can be used to only in

43:06only certain industries or certain types

43:09of businesses okay so they're not

43:10valuable to everybody

43:13necessarily and these are often more

43:16attractive um to find situations to

43:19acquire companies with specialized

43:21resources because they might be uniquely

43:23valuable to you all right you don't have

43:25to deal with the same level level of

43:27competition you know people looking to

43:29buy up these

43:31things as you would in regards to

43:34generalized

43:35resources okay it's kind of like if you

43:39were

43:41to oh I don't

43:44know let's say you're you were to go

43:47online and start looking

43:49[Music]

43:52for something that everybody is looking

43:55for would be interested in using you

43:56know

43:57a brand new iPhone all right that's just

43:59been barely used that somebody has for

44:01sale all right something like that going

44:03to be fairly expensive all right you're

44:06probably not going to get a deal on the

44:08used Market trying to buy up something

44:10like that but on the used Market if

44:12you're trying to buy something like I

44:15don't know

44:17antique ham radio operating equipment

44:21okay and you're a ham radio Enthusiast

44:23and you really like that stuff um and

44:25somebody in your neighborhood selling it

44:28you'll probably get a deal it's probably

44:30uniquely valuable to you that's a kind

44:32of eccentric enough of a hobby to where

44:35you could probably buy something that

44:36would make you really happy and you

44:37would get a deal on it okay more so than

44:41things like if somebody in your

44:42neighborhood was selling a very lightly

44:44used brand uh brand new model of iPhone

44:48okay um there specific versus

44:52generalized resources okay so spe

44:55specialized resources

44:58uh in terms of pursuing different

45:01diversification those are usually where

45:04you might find your deals okay so like

45:06if you're a Cosmetics company you know

45:09R&D centers buying up things like that

45:12that often uh makes a little bit more

45:15sense

45:17because they'll be uniquely valuable to

45:20you as an acquirer versus everybody else

45:23you're not competing with the field

45:30so the word we're sort of dancing around

45:32here again is is uh economies of scope

45:35all right and economies of scope of

45:37course are when it's more efficient to

45:41operate two businesses under the same

45:43roof rather than it is for those

45:45businesses to specialize and operate

45:47separately why would it be more

45:50efficient to operate two businesses

45:52under the same roof rather than

45:53separately well because they're sharing

45:57uh different components uh or they're

45:59sharing different departments

46:03okay um or one of them has a you know

46:07sort of byproduct that's usable for the

46:09other company those are some of the

46:11reasons you get economies of

46:14scope all right so when you can transfer

46:17skills between those two lines of

46:20business so like you know racing okay do

46:23you want to enter into the competitive

46:25racing industry

46:27um well it's usually more efficient to

46:30enter into a competitive racing industry

46:32if you're already an automobile

46:35manufacturer because one you can use

46:37what you know is just an already

46:39automobile manufacturer to make a race

46:41car all right um and then in terms of

46:46operating that race car and tuning it

46:48and everything you can take what you

46:50learn from the track and share it back

46:52to your street cars okay and they get

46:54better and better and more efficient and

46:57effective and robust and higher

46:59performance and everything

47:01else other situations maybe you can

47:04combine two value chain activities you

47:07can say well I'm running two businesses

47:08but how about we just have one HR

47:10department that serves both of

47:13those sometimes you can leverage the

47:15brand name all right as we've discussed

47:19earlier

47:22um and then you know again there can be

47:25knowledge sharing of course always

47:27between two lines of

47:30business so an economy of scope again

47:33this is occurs when it's cheaper for you

47:37to operate in two lines of business for

47:41one firm to operate two lines a business

47:43then it would be for two firms to

47:46operate separately all right that there

47:49and

47:51specialize economies of scale which you

47:53might confuse with economies of scope is

47:56different economy of scale is when it

47:58gets increasingly more efficient as you

48:02become a larger and larger business all

48:04right economies of scope means you get

48:07more efficient as you operate more lines

48:10of

48:18business okay so moving on here um you

48:22know again the only reason you should

48:26ever

48:27diversify is because you're going to

48:29create more shareholder value um through

48:35diversifying

48:37then your uh stockholders could create

48:40on their own through portfolio investing

48:43okay so what that means is there's some

48:46way that bringing these multiple lines

48:48of business Under One Roof um there's an

48:52economy of scope that makes it more

48:54efficient or more effective for those

48:56both to be Under One Roof and being

48:59managed together then they would be

49:03operating separately and specializing on

49:06their own all

49:09right usually uh you're going to create

49:12more shareholder value through related

49:16diversification okay I mean there's some

49:20situations where you see like okay well

49:22what about Berkshire halfway all right

49:25so I mean maybe there's there's some

49:27Oddball situations where you have

49:29someone like Warren Buffett running um

49:32and keeping an eye on all these

49:33different lines of business okay um but

49:36that's sort of the exception rather than

49:37the

49:38rule

49:41um again you know you're looking for

49:45shareholder value and usually this

49:47implies that there needs to be something

49:51being done you know in terms of

49:52management taking some sort of internal

49:54actions to realize these gains of you

49:58know combining these two lines of

50:00business

50:03together now in other situations you can

50:05have unrelated diversification and there

50:10although unrelated diversification

50:13generally

50:14um I mean seriously it often destroys

50:17shareholder value uh there there's some

50:20different Logics for why you might do it

50:23and we can talk about some of these

50:27uh in certain situations you know people

50:30could be asking themselves these

50:32questions and trying to decide whether

50:35or not unrelated diversification makes

50:37sense okay you know one is can

50:42it meet or exceed our targets for

50:47profitability and return on investment

50:49all right another question you might be

50:51asking is well is this in an industry

50:53that's very

50:54attractive and then number three is is

50:56well is it a big enough of a deal that

50:59it's going to significantly contribute

51:01to the parent company's bottom

51:04line there are some rationals again for

51:08divver unrelated diversification one is

51:11like some people think okay well I can

51:14diversify Buy app other companies or

51:17whatever in other lines of business and

51:18I

51:19can do this because I can my company can

51:23provide really good corporate parenting

51:26to these others okay so we can buy up

51:28some companies and through management

51:30leadership and everything our expertise

51:33we can use those to make those companies

51:36operate better more efficient more

51:39effective than they were operating

51:41before they came under our ownership

51:44okay things like Berkshire hathway does

51:46all

51:48right um and they think you know this

51:50generalized sort of business knowledge

51:53is going to make these companies work

51:54better than they did on they wrong all

51:57right now there's also what we call

52:00Financial economies of scope that's the

52:02second rationale all right how Financial

52:06economies of scope work

52:08is

52:10um sometimes what will happen is you can

52:13have

52:15a a portfolio of companies okay and the

52:20corporate

52:21parent will distribute funds to

52:25companies within that port portfolio and

52:28the idea is that that corporate parent

52:30has a better knowledge about those

52:32companies that are contained within the

52:34that portfolio um how they're managed

52:37what their needs are um those kinds of

52:40questions and that they can provide

52:43those companies funding at in a way

52:46that's more efficient than those

52:48companies could do if they were on their

52:50own trying to get loans from Banks or

52:53wherever or trying to issue stock

52:56ownership trying to raise money that way

53:00um and that you know they the corporate

53:04parent can loan them money or do

53:06whatever they need to do and that that

53:09would be cheaper for those companies

53:11than it would be if they were to take

53:13out traditional loans and be having to

53:15pay back whatever interest rates the

53:16bank gives them or that they you know

53:20might not get what they're actually

53:22worth if they were to try to sell um

53:25issues stock or sell ownership in some

53:28other ways and that it's more efficient

53:30for sort of the uh corporate parent to

53:33serve as this internal Capital Market

53:36Distributing funds to those

53:38companies there's other things else that

53:41they can do if one of those companies

53:43does want to take out debt and they're

53:45part of a uh corporate portfolio rather

53:48than a single business they can take out

53:50a lot more debt than a similar company

53:53that's not tied to a corporate parent

53:55it's kind of like having your your

53:56corporate parent is your co-signer all

53:58right so like if you were going to issue

54:00a loan out to a a beer company okay um a

54:05craft beer company and one's an

54:06independent company owned by no one and

54:09the other is Goose Island all right

54:11owned by I think it's

54:13Budweiser um clearly you're going to

54:17offer a better rate and everything to

54:19Goose Island because you know well if

54:22even if they go bankrupt or whatever uh

54:25another huge your company that owns them

54:27is going to be on the hook that isn't

54:28going to go bankrupt uh whereas that

54:31smaller company yeah if they go Belly Up

54:34it might be pretty hard to get your

54:35money

54:39back and then there's other rationals

54:42that include like uh restructuring uh

54:45undervalued companies so uh this is like

54:49corporate takeovers that kind of stuff

54:51um if you're familiar with t- Boon

54:54Pickins uh who's was a big

54:56contributor to like Oklahoma State

54:59football program uh he was a corporate

55:02Raider and what he used to do is he

55:05would buy up troubled

55:07companies fire a whole bunch of the

55:09management put his own people in charge

55:13um and when the companies were being

55:16managed a little bit better and a little

55:18bit more effective he would sell them

55:19off um and try to turn them around

55:23really quickly kind of like what people

55:25do flipping houses but he is trying to

55:26like flip

55:28businesses uh so you can also do that

55:32type of work and that's another

55:33rationale for you can build uh you know

55:36shareholder value through unrelated

55:41diversification you can kind of look at

55:43the uh attractiveness test cost of Entry

55:47test and better off test and match it up

55:50to some of these different uh ways you

55:54can make money through unrelated

55:56diversifications like the attractiveness

55:58test

55:59is well um do we think we can diversify

56:05into a business that's producing you

56:07know consistently good earnings and

56:09return on investment you know is there

56:11any any companies out there that are

56:14churning out enough profits that it

56:16would make sense for us to buy them up

56:18uh cost of Entry test well a lot of the

56:21time people that like to engage in

56:24diversification buy up compan companies

56:27think that well they're really really

56:29really good negotiators and they're

56:30going to get a favorable price and their

56:34skills um are going to let them get it

56:38at at a price that anybody else wouldn't

56:41have and and you know because they

56:42bought it it's proof that they got it at

56:44a good price is sort of what they're

56:45thinking um but anyway cost of Entry

56:48test is well okay if you actually are

56:49able to negotiate favorable acquisition

56:52prices then you know maybe that that

56:54would fit too

56:57and then the better off test is you know

56:59um will we be better off as a result of

57:02buying up this company or making this

57:04move well you could do that through

57:08uh providing you know managerial

57:12oversight the internal Capital Market

57:15how you're able to distribute resources

57:17to those companies um if they need to be

57:19restructured all of those different

57:21things could perhaps make shareholders

57:23better off uh as a result of you buying

57:26up these businesses even if they are

57:29unrelated there's a lot of drawbacks to

57:32unrelated

57:33diversification um it requires a lot of

57:37managerial requirements I mean if you're

57:40buying up companies that are failures or

57:43that seem troubled to turn them around

57:47um or to to properly manage them so that

57:51you can set them right back on the on

57:52the proper course is going to be very

57:55difficult and entail a lot of managerial

57:59requirements

58:01um if they're unrelated to you then you

58:05know what sort

58:09of significant resources do you have

58:12that you bring to the table are you

58:13really going to let them have this you

58:16know sustained competitive Advantage I

58:19mean because of your resources you're

58:21able to share with a a business that's

58:24well outside of your um wheelhouse or

58:27doesn't have similar a similar resource

58:29base to you so there's a limited

58:31competitive Advantage uh potential

58:36there um again monitoring maintaining

58:41parenting that's something that's

58:43difficult and that that's you're going

58:45to spend a lot of time doing that and

58:47you're probably not going to have uh the

58:50the fit between your businesses again

58:52they don't they don't fit together very

58:53well when you when you do this kind of

58:55stuff

58:56there's a lot of really poor rationals

58:58for unrelated

59:00diversification one is trying to reduce

59:02business investment Risk by saying well

59:04if we diversify and we spread the risk

59:07into different areas then it's less

59:10likely that this business is going to go

59:13under um because you know any one of

59:17those segments might go under but

59:19there's still all of the others and they

59:21might you

59:22know be counter cyclical to each other

59:26or whatever so that the likelihood of

59:28the hole all going under at once isn't

59:31very likely um that's a poor rationale

59:36because yes that's true to an extent but

59:39shareholders would much rather build

59:42their own portfolios okay they don't

59:44want you to do that for them they all

59:45have their own unique risk tolerances

59:48and what they would rather do is buy

59:51stock in a single company where that

59:55operates in one line of business and

59:57then depending on their risk preference

1:00:00pick whatever else to bundle into that

1:00:03portfolio

1:00:06Okay uh other situations is sometimes

1:00:10companies might want to just pursue

1:00:11growth for the sake of growth okay and

1:00:13by growth I mean revenue growth not

1:00:16profit growth uh profit growth is what

1:00:19you want um and should be shooting for

1:00:21but Revenue growth um you know just

1:00:24managing a larger and larger stream of

1:00:27income um that's not necessarily what

1:00:30you're targeting a lot of the time that

1:00:33companies start pursuing growth for the

1:00:35sake of its own sake I guess is uh

1:00:40because at one point CEOs were paid

1:00:43based on how large of a revenue stream

1:00:45they managed so what they would do is

1:00:46just try to grow the revenue stream by

1:00:49engaging in a lot of diversification and

1:00:52it would get

1:00:54unrelated um again the seeking to

1:00:57stabilize

1:00:59uh counter cyclical swings well um we

1:01:04discuss this with the first point here

1:01:06and then also dealing with managerial

1:01:09motives uh again sometimes the people

1:01:11that run corporations or whatever might

1:01:15get a kick out of buying companies okay

1:01:17you get a rush out of it you feel like

1:01:19it's uh you're really mve you're a real

1:01:22mover and Shaker in the industry and

1:01:24that you're taking these calculated risk

1:01:27and you know it's it's it's a big deal

1:01:30when you do acquire somebody and um you

1:01:33know you can have just managers who have

1:01:36their own sort of they're feeding their

1:01:38egos by getting into mergers and

1:01:41Acquisitions and of course you never

1:01:43want to be operating a business to feed

1:01:46your ego in that

1:01:50way now there's a lot of different types

1:01:53of ways you can get into related or

1:01:55related

1:01:57diversification uh we'll discuss more on

1:02:00the following slide but you know you can

1:02:02be dominant business narrowly

1:02:04Diversified broadly Diversified multi-

1:02:08bus okay so there's different sort of

1:02:10degrees you can

1:02:13diversify so here for example like a a

1:02:16dominant business Enterprise is one

1:02:18where you know most of the uh income for

1:02:22that company is coming from one single

1:02:26business unit okay one line of business

1:02:28so something like Harley-Davidson where

1:02:31and maybe they do a few other things but

1:02:32most of their money is coming from

1:02:34selling

1:02:35motorcycles all right that's would be

1:02:37like a dominant business

1:02:38Enterprise now you have others where

1:02:41it's narrowly Diversified

1:02:44so maybe you know there's a little bit

1:02:48of unrelated diversification in there

1:02:51but not a whole lot okay most of the

1:02:53money is coming from you know uh a

1:02:57couple lines of business at most all

1:02:59right so you can look at something like

1:03:02Yamaha okay where yeah they make ATVs

1:03:07motorcycles that kind of stuff they also

1:03:09make like musical

1:03:12instruments um and I think they might

1:03:15even make some Electronics but still

1:03:17it's a small grouping of things yeah

1:03:19it's unrelated but it's getting to but

1:03:21it's not a very big group of things when

1:03:25you start getting into broadly

1:03:26Diversified or multi- business firms

1:03:28you're looking at conglomerates okay

1:03:30things like Berkshire hathway all right

1:03:32look up Berkshire hathway okay it's a

1:03:34it's a conglomerate you'll see that they

1:03:37own operate in a whole slew of different

1:03:41lines of business okay from you know

1:03:44we're talking about insurance to you

1:03:47know food and beverage

1:03:50to uh I think at one point they were

1:03:53making like like RVS and campers and

1:03:56stuff they own owned a company that was

1:03:57involved in that um so very wide uh

1:04:02lines of

1:04:05business so now to evaluate the

1:04:09uh firm's

1:04:11Diversified uh present lineup there's a

1:04:13number of steps that you can follow all

1:04:16right the first step for evaluating the

1:04:19strategy of a diversified firm entails

1:04:22assessing all of the industries that

1:04:24you've Diversified into all right and

1:04:26seeing if those are attractive

1:04:27Industries using something kind of like

1:04:29quarters five forces to measure how

1:04:32attractive the industries are the next

1:04:34step is

1:04:36to assess the competitive strengths of

1:04:39of the firms in each of their industry

1:04:42Industries okay um kind of like what you

1:04:44would do with like the competitive

1:04:46strengths assessment and I'll show you

1:04:47an example of all of this uh in a later

1:04:51slide here so I'll just kind of brush

1:04:52over it right now

1:04:55third step you want to evaluate and see

1:04:58how well you could possibly fit these

1:05:01businesses together could they share

1:05:03certain types of resources and pieces of

1:05:05their value chain with one another if

1:05:07they can that's always better because it

1:05:09helps you reduce

1:05:12redundancy then you want to check and

1:05:14see how well they fit with your firm's

1:05:17resources what your resource base has

1:05:20you know and if this is

1:05:22uh if if these businesses just

1:05:24strategically fit with what you are

1:05:26capable of doing and and really good at

1:05:30doing and then after that you want to go

1:05:33ahead and rank all of your prospects

1:05:36and from best to worst in terms of where

1:05:39you want to spend your money and

1:05:40allocate your resources and time and

1:05:42budget and then step six is crafting

1:05:45moves to improve the corporate

1:05:47performance okay so this might entail

1:05:49funneling money into some of the

1:05:52businesses that are growing it might

1:05:54entail divesting of some of of them that

1:05:56seem like they could be a dead end

1:05:59or um you know different strategies such

1:06:03as

1:06:06that so for evaluating the

1:06:09attractiveness of the industry

1:06:12um of the industries that you're

1:06:15operating in uh you have a handful of

1:06:19questions you're going to be asking

1:06:20yourself you know how attractive are

1:06:22these these industries all right um does

1:06:26the industry represent a good Market

1:06:28okay uh which of these are Industries

1:06:32are most attractive and which of these

1:06:33are least attractive in relation to one

1:06:35another all

1:06:38right so some things you might put in in

1:06:42terms

1:06:43of calculating the industry

1:06:46attractiveness scores are here's a

1:06:48number of variables that would make

1:06:50sense okay you know the the the market

1:06:52size and projected growth rate um

1:06:56what the competition's like in that

1:06:58industry emerging threats and

1:07:00opportunities okay

1:07:03uh presence of cross industry fit

1:07:06because it's not like we're just

1:07:08evaluating the industry like you with

1:07:10Porter's five forces it's um there's a

1:07:13little bit more to it than that because

1:07:14it's you're trying to fit it into your

1:07:17Diversified portfolio of firms okay so

1:07:20you want to take into consideration

1:07:22cross industry strategic fit

1:07:26um resource requirements does it fit

1:07:29with what you have right now uh you

1:07:32could also include some of the elements

1:07:34of the pestl industry profitability okay

1:07:38so you kind of some of these these

1:07:42pieces necessitate you to do calculate

1:07:44Porter's five forces for each of them

1:07:48um but that's probably something you're

1:07:50you're doing or very aware of at least

1:07:52all those forces if you are running a

1:07:59corporation so again calculating the

1:08:01attractiveness from the multi-business

1:08:04persp perspective um you're looking

1:08:08for cross industry fit you know how well

1:08:12do these industry value chains match up

1:08:15to one another where can there can they

1:08:17be can pieces be shared all right and

1:08:21also the resource requirements are these

1:08:24resources that you already have or are

1:08:27able to

1:08:32collect so then what you do in the next

1:08:35step is essentially you create one of

1:08:38those weighted industry uh scores kind

1:08:41of like what you did with the

1:08:42competitive strengths assessment so it's

1:08:44going to look something like

1:08:46this you can see in

1:08:49pink on the very left there's all of the

1:08:52variables we came up with and in Orange

1:08:56there's your importance weights and you

1:08:58come up with those all on your own again

1:09:00you know what you think the importance

1:09:02of each of those variables is or

1:09:05aspects and then in gray green and red

1:09:13you can see

1:09:14where we've gone through and actually

1:09:17calculate and actually um given a

1:09:20assigned a score to each of these

1:09:22companies okay so first line uh of the

1:09:26gray you can see is business a and

1:09:29Industry a and what you want to do in

1:09:32the The First Column is come up with how

1:09:35you would score that business for each

1:09:36of those C each of those variables we

1:09:38came up with okay so on a scale of 1 to

1:09:4010 how would you say it ranks all right

1:09:43this is kind of subjective okay uh same

1:09:46with like the cons competitive strengths

1:09:49assessment okay um you can think about

1:09:52all the data you've seen and everything

1:09:54else where would you score them on a

1:09:56scale of 1 to 10 and that's where all of

1:09:59those numbers in the First Column come

1:10:01from the numbers in the second gray

1:10:04column come from multiplying that score

1:10:07by the colum by the numbers in the

1:10:10orange column which are your weights so

1:10:12you multiply your actual score by the

1:10:14weights this gives you a weighted score

1:10:17you add up all of those weighted scores

1:10:20and then if you look at the very bottom

1:10:23of the second gray column you'll see

1:10:24it's weighted score all right

1:10:288.35 okay and you do that for all of

1:10:31your businesses so you can see the same

1:10:33thing was done for the green columns the

1:10:35same thing was done for the red columns

1:10:38um and in going through this you can see

1:10:40that business a and Industry a uh looks

1:10:44like that has the best fit for your

1:10:48portfolio um right now or that's the the

1:10:51the most attractive industry at very

1:10:54least to be in

1:10:56and you can see that uh industry B is

1:11:00the least attractive okay red falls in

1:11:03the

1:11:04middle you follow a very similar process

1:11:07now for evaluating the unit competitive

1:11:12strength okay so the strength of the

1:11:14individual companies follows a very

1:11:16similar practice to what we just did all

1:11:19right where you come up with your

1:11:20variables maybe something like market

1:11:22share cost relative to the compet

1:11:26competition um brand image and

1:11:29reputation you know you come up with

1:11:30these different variables okay that give

1:11:33you sort of there a generalized measure

1:11:37of how successful your company is within

1:11:41its respective

1:11:42industry so then you calculate one of

1:11:44those matrixes and that's on the next

1:11:48slide so here's the Matrix okay for the

1:11:53competitive strengths of each of these

1:11:57businesses in their respective industry

1:11:59so again in the first line of column the

1:12:02first column in pink you can see those

1:12:04are all the variables we came up with

1:12:07the orange is the importance weights we

1:12:09came up

1:12:10with and then the pairs of columns in

1:12:14gray green and blue are going to be the

1:12:18scores for the businesses themselves the

1:12:20scores and weighted scores so First

1:12:24Column uh in the first gray column you

1:12:27can see there's those strengths ratings

1:12:29on a scale of 1 to 10 where you you know

1:12:32sort of think through it okay how much

1:12:34market share does this company have on a

1:12:36scale of 1 to 10 looks like whoever was

1:12:39scoring this said it has a lot and gave

1:12:41them a 10 10 out of 10 okay and you go

1:12:45down the list and go through that same

1:12:47process then to get your weighted score

1:12:50you just do the same thing you multiply

1:12:52the strength rating by the orange column

1:12:56the that corresponds to it so that

1:12:58importance weight which is 0.15 in this

1:13:01case you multiply those two numbers

1:13:04together that gives you a weighted score

1:13:07so the weighted score for relative

1:13:09market share for business a and Industry

1:13:12a is

1:13:141.5 then after you've done that for all

1:13:17of those variables you add up all of

1:13:20your uh weighted scores and that gives

1:13:23you an overall weight weighted score

1:13:26which you can see that in the second

1:13:28gray column at the very bottom there's

1:13:30the overall weighted score of

1:13:337.85 and then you go through the exact

1:13:36same process with your other

1:13:38businesses now again you can see

1:13:41business a and Industry a looks like

1:13:43that's the most uh competitively strong

1:13:47company in its respective industry

1:13:50compared to other businesses in this

1:13:52corporation's portfolio

1:13:56so now here's where you bring together

1:13:58those two matrixes that you had made all

1:14:02right you bring them together here um to

1:14:05create this nine cell industry

1:14:08attractiveness competitive strength

1:14:10Matrix and how it works is on your y AIS

1:14:14you have you know a scale from 1 to 10

1:14:17that displays industry

1:14:20attractiveness on your X AIS you have a

1:14:24scale from 1 to 10 that it displays

1:14:27competitive strength/

1:14:29market position and what you do is based

1:14:32on those weighted scores you received go

1:14:36going through the other two tasks is you

1:14:38plot each of these businesses in their

1:14:41respective Industries okay and again you

1:14:44can go through this process and you see

1:14:46right away that um business a in

1:14:49Industry a is you know your most

1:14:53succcessful

1:14:55uh business in your portfolio and

1:14:58business B and Industry B is kind of a

1:15:01problem child C is pretty strong I mean

1:15:06it's it's it's pretty good in its

1:15:08industry um so you know the next step is

1:15:11okay well we need to

1:15:18determine so step five we get into

1:15:22ranking business units and a deing a

1:15:25priority for resource allocation so

1:15:28things you might want to consider when

1:15:30you're ranking these businesses is okay

1:15:32well what's their growth prospects look

1:15:34like in terms of sales and profits okay

1:15:37how much are they contributing to the

1:15:39company's earnings overall um what's

1:15:42their Roi are they do they have

1:15:44favorable

1:15:46um financial ratios and everything and

1:15:49investment prospects okay and the idea

1:15:52is that you want to steer resources to

1:15:55business units with the strongest profit

1:15:57and growth

1:15:59prospects um and also where they have

1:16:02solid strategic and resource fit all

1:16:05right and I and you don't want to steer

1:16:08money toward businesses that have

1:16:09already matured and they're in

1:16:11industries that aren't growing okay

1:16:13sometimes that happens like I I've

1:16:15mentioned before Philip Morris um they

1:16:18found that they've kind of Tapped Out

1:16:20The Tobacco industry okay that's uh

1:16:24that's a line of their business that is

1:16:25generating excess profits it doesn't

1:16:28make sense at this point for them to

1:16:30invest any more into it because the

1:16:32industry is matured they sort of figured

1:16:34out all the operations and everything to

1:16:37make uh cigarettes or whatever as

1:16:40efficiently as

1:16:41possible so now they're sort of a

1:16:44corporation they buy up other little

1:16:46businesses and figure out okay how can

1:16:48we pump money into them that we've

1:16:50earned from selling tobacco or or

1:16:54cigarettes and everything uh to these

1:16:58other business units that have you know

1:17:00strong growth prospects and everything

1:17:04else so what are your options afterward

1:17:07you've already Diversified and you're

1:17:10trying to craft some strategic moves to

1:17:13improve your performance well you

1:17:15basically have four options one do

1:17:18nothing just stick with the current

1:17:19business lineup two you can try to

1:17:23broaden your diversification add on some

1:17:25new

1:17:26businesses three you can devest and

1:17:29retrench okay so get rid of those ones

1:17:32that don't fit or tangential to your

1:17:35resource base and everything or that are

1:17:37just poor

1:17:38performing and then four you can just

1:17:41reshuffle the deck okay maybe get rid of

1:17:44some but add on additional businesses

1:17:47but just

1:17:53reshuffle all right so so why would you

1:17:55want to pursue any of these given

1:17:58strategies well there's a number of

1:18:00reasons one you might want to stick with

1:18:02the existing lineup if what you're doing

1:18:06is currently working really well um

1:18:09don't fix what's not broken if you like

1:18:12what you have then you can just stick

1:18:13with the existing lineup if it's working

1:18:15with you you don't really feel ready to

1:18:19start taking risk and expanding outward

1:18:22all of what you have seem to be doing

1:18:24pretty well stick with what you have you

1:18:27might broaden your diversification base

1:18:31if you're in a position where you feel

1:18:35like everything you have is sort of

1:18:37Tapped Out you've found all of the

1:18:40efficiencies and everything and rather

1:18:42than funling more money back into those

1:18:45businesses or just taking the the

1:18:47profits you feel like they could be put

1:18:49to better use by diversifying into

1:18:52another line of business

1:18:55now in other cases you might want to

1:18:57devest of some businesses and retrench

1:18:59to narrow your diversification base and

1:19:02you might do this if you are involved in

1:19:05some lines of business that just aren't

1:19:07working okay you're in some clearly

1:19:10unprofitable

1:19:12positions where you have poorly

1:19:14performing firms in poor markets things

1:19:17like that then you want to you

1:19:21know find some addition by subtracting

1:19:24all right shed the dead L the dead

1:19:26weight and strengthen your position and

1:19:29then lastly you might be in a situation

1:19:32where you want to restructure you have

1:19:35some businesses that are clearly working

1:19:38and you have the funds to further

1:19:41diversify but you also have some things

1:19:43that aren't working for you either you

1:19:45have some of that dead weight so in that

1:19:47case you might want to sort of reshuffle

1:19:49the deck and

1:19:51restructure by divesting of some of them

1:19:56and then using the funds you get from

1:19:59that investment to purchase other lines

1:20:02of business or pursue other lines of

1:20:04business and again reshuffle the deck

1:20:07get rid of some take on some other new

1:20:09lines of

1:20:11business but anyway that's what I have

1:20:13to say for this particular lecture

Recently added transcripts

Browse the whole transcript library

This transcript was generated from the captions YouTube publishes for this video. Get the transcript of any YouTube video atfreeyoutubetranscribe.com, free, unlimited, no sign-up.