Free YouTube Transcribe

Video transcript

IDS 102 - Applied Ethics Slides 1-7

Samantha Vance · 3,048 words · 14 min read

Want to search this transcript, jump the video from any line, or download it as TXT, SRT, or VTT?

Open in the transcript tool

Full transcript

0:01okay so test one is in the books i hope

0:04that it did not give too many of you

0:07excuse me problems

0:09i warned you to work on it as we went

0:11through but inevitably some of you

0:13waited till the last minute and that

0:14didn't turn out

0:15as well for you as you might have hoped

0:17your test two

0:18is already up it's there please download

0:21it and work on it as you go

0:23because a lot of the test questions are

0:26going to

0:28repeat or be very very similar to blog

0:31posts

0:32a test question requires a great deal of

0:34thought

0:37and much more content than a simple blog

0:39post does but the blog post will get you

0:41started

0:42and then you can expand on what you

0:43write there as you move into

0:46your test questions one of the things

0:48we're going to talk about in the next

0:49video

0:50is the difference between an opinion and

0:53a stance

0:54and what i'm going to ask you to develop

0:55in this class is a stance

0:58because the stance can be supported um

1:00before we get into that though we're

1:02going to talk about the beginning of the

1:04next unit which is applied

1:06ethics now we talked about metaethics

1:08which which is kind of the

1:10excuse me commentator for football and

1:12then we talked about normative ethics

1:14normative ethics are

1:16the referees that sort of put everything

1:18in perspective and in line and gives us

1:20something we can really really work with

1:23and then we're to applied ethics this is

1:26the players

1:27on the field this is when we take

1:29everything we've learned about the rules

1:31and the opinions involved in ethics and

1:34now we're going to take

1:35all of that and apply it to the really

1:38tough issues things like abortion

1:40and euthanasia things like assisted

1:42suicide and environmental ethics

1:45so those things that really are going to

1:47um

1:48cause you to think and and i really want

1:50to express to you how important it is

1:54that you remain open-minded as we move

1:57through this

1:59we are not going to enter into religious

2:00debates or anything like that this is an

2:03ethics class and while we've seen ethics

2:06sometimes it's tied to religion

2:07it is not religion and allowing your

2:10religion to determine your ethics can

2:12sometimes be a very dangerous thing so

2:13keep that in mind as we move forward and

2:15i really want you to keep

2:17um conscious of the fact that i need you

2:20to be open-minded okay so

2:22let's talk about applied ethics um first

2:25of all and this is the single most

2:26important slide i'm going to give you

2:28in this entire unit because what this

2:31has done

2:32is it has taken all the principles of

2:35things like duty ethics and virtue

2:37ethics

2:38and um kantian ethics and prima facie

2:41duty and all of those things that we

2:43talked about

2:45and boiled it down to a list

2:48of applied ethics principles

2:51that we can take and ask ourselves the

2:54question

2:55about any issue based on this list

2:59so what you've got is personal benefit

3:01so

3:02does whatever you're looking at produce

3:04a beneficial consequence for an

3:06individual

3:08societal or social benefit does whatever

3:11issue we're looking at provide benefits

3:13to society

3:15benevolence does it help paternalism

3:19does it help people who cannot help

3:21themselves

3:23the principle of harm is really

3:25important because it's very simple

3:27don't hurt other people do not harm

3:30other people

3:31ethical behavior never involves harming

3:34someone else

3:35or someone else's stuff or someone

3:37else's livelihood or someone else's

3:39family relationships

3:41principle of honesty don't lie do not

3:44deceive

3:44others especially when you're dealing

3:46with an ethical question

3:47and this is one that has gotten lost in

3:49the 21st century because people are so

3:51desperate to be right they're so

3:55desperate to be

3:56accepted and they're so desperate to be

3:58thought of as woke which is the

4:00stupidest word on the planet bt dubs and

4:02we're going to talk about that as we go

4:05that they will lie or mislead or

4:08manipulate

4:10other people to get their way principle

4:13of lawfulness

4:14don't break the law do not break the law

4:16if the law says that this

4:18certain thing is is illegal you have to

4:21acknowledge that

4:23now we we know the other side just

4:26because something's legal doesn't mean

4:27it's ethical

4:29but if it's illegal you really have to

4:31stop and question it

4:34um principle autonomy now this is the

4:36one that most of you are going to

4:38recognize

4:38this is the question of a free person's

4:40freedom over his or her own

4:42body and of course abortion is the first

4:45thing that comes to your mind

4:46but there's also questions that involve

4:48principle of autonomy that are much more

4:50complicated for example

4:52jehovah's witnesses are not allowed to

4:54receive blood transfusions

4:57so if i'm an adult and i say

5:01i cannot receive a blood transfusion

5:02because of my religious beliefs

5:05then the hospital respects that what if

5:08it's a child

5:10does that child have the freedom over

5:14his or her actions or body

5:16should a nine-year-old be able to go get

5:18a medical procedure

5:19without parents permission because it's

5:22their own body

5:24should a six-year-old be able to get a

5:25tattoo

5:29all right so the principle of justice

5:30now this involves the

5:32due process this involves that if

5:34somebody has committed something a crime

5:36or done something wrong

5:38or even if someone has wronged others

5:42it acknowledges this person's right to

5:45um compensation or

5:49reparation or repayment or

5:52that concept of justice now you have a

5:55video that talks about what justice

5:57is and i'm looking forward to y'all's

5:59responses about that because it's really

6:01good

6:02and then the last one is a very sort of

6:05hodgepodge collection

6:06this is your basic rights your right to

6:09life

6:10information your right to privacy your

6:12right to safety your right to expression

6:15but remember rule number one is your

6:18rights

6:19stop where my rights start

6:22and my rights stop where your rights

6:26start you don't get to tear something up

6:30of mine because you're mad at somebody

6:31else you violated my rights

6:35okay so here's the application we're

6:39going to put to this this is a

6:41the case of a child called they called

6:43her baby doe it was 1982

6:46okay 1982 so it's 40 years ago

6:50um and you have to remember medical

6:53technology is not what it was 40 years

6:55ago

6:56i mean what it medical technology is not

6:59medical technology was not what it is

7:02today

7:0340 years ago that was harder to say than

7:05i should have been

7:07this child was born and you can read

7:09this explanation

7:10this child was born with a severe case

7:13of down syndrome

7:16now let me put a caveat here most of our

7:18impressions of down syndrome

7:20are the m are the television shows like

7:22born this way or peanut butter falcon

7:25and those are very high functioning um

7:27people with down syndrome

7:29okay down syndrome is a almost like a

7:32spectrum of different levels

7:34some people are able to do just fine

7:36live by themselves whatever and some

7:38people can never be left alone

7:39they have to have someone with them all

7:41the time this was a

7:42very severe case this child would likely

7:44have been non-verbal

7:46and would likely not have had a long

7:48life expectancy

7:49regardless of anything else but on top

7:52of this severe case of down syndrome

7:54this child also had an esophageal

7:56fistula basically the esophagus did not

7:59connect to the stomach

8:01so the child would never re receive

8:03nutrients

8:04now there is a surgery that fixes that

8:07esophageal fistula

8:10but the parents elected not to do it now

8:13your first thought is

8:14oh my god how could they not alright

8:16wait now

8:18look at your rights look at your list on

8:21one side we have the infant's right to

8:23life

8:24that baby had a right to live and it

8:27suggests the surgery should have been

8:29done

8:30you also have the principle of

8:31paternalism that says we should help

8:33others when they cannot help themselves

8:34that baby obviously could not make that

8:35choice for itself

8:37so on one side you have rights and and

8:39paternalism

8:41but in ethics there are always two sides

8:44don't ever

8:45think that your opinion is right or the

8:47only one because that's dangerous

8:50the other side you have to question the

8:52personal and social benefit

8:54of saving this baby the baby's quality

8:58of life

8:59on a personal level would have been

9:01deplorable

9:03it would likely never been able to feed

9:05itself or

9:06be potty trained its quality of life

9:09would have been

9:11bad the social benefit would also

9:15have created a financial burden for the

9:17parents

9:19huge financial burden because are you

9:22gonna stay at home

9:23at all you know your entire life and

9:24look after this adult child

9:26what happens when you die

9:30you will have spent all your resources

9:32and all your money caring for this baby

9:35while you were alive there will be

9:37nothing to care for it later

9:38and if this if society has to pick up

9:41the bill

9:43for a person with no quality of life

9:46that's a bad deal so our initial and

9:49this is what i really want you to pay

9:51attention to

9:52your initial response was horror that's

9:55your emotional response

9:58see it recognize it and then set it to

10:00the side

10:01and start asking those hard questions go

10:03back to that list

10:04go back to that list and apply all of

10:07those principles

10:08to a certain issue and come up with both

10:11sides

10:12and then you have to decide how you feel

10:15about that or what your stance is about

10:17that based on

10:18these principles not your emotional

10:20response

10:22okay so foregoing the surgery seemed

10:26like it was the best thing because of

10:27the

10:27the quality of life and

10:30the the infant's right to life was

10:32unclear because

10:34of the severity of the impairments

10:37mental and physical

10:38that it was facing because you got to

10:41remember your moral rights involve more

10:43than just your physical body

10:45because if i can keep your body alive on

10:47a machine indefinitely

10:49so that i can continue to collect your

10:50social security check

10:54is that the morally right thing to do

10:57the answer is

10:58no but it happens every day

11:02um when you talk about a person's right

11:06to life

11:07that implies cognitive function and

11:10moral personhood okay and this is the

11:14big question with abortion

11:16right to life cognitive function

11:19and moral personhood hold on to those

11:21two thoughts so

11:23this is our example what they wound up

11:25doing is they

11:26they elected not to have the surgery and

11:28the baby died

11:30which is terribly sad but at the end of

11:33the day

11:34it was very likely the best thing

11:37for the baby the parents society

11:40the hospital everybody

11:44from a very practical non-emotional

11:46stance now some of you are

11:47fuming mad with me right now stop it

11:50you cannot be fuming mad with me because

11:53fuming mad means you're responding how

11:57emotionally and you can't do that

11:59remember this was also 40 years ago

12:01okay so now that i've gotten everybody

12:04upset

12:05let's talk about our major um topics

12:08here all right so we're going to

12:11touch some things i could teach this

12:13class

12:14for years and never touch the moral

12:17ethical dilemmas

12:18that we face in the 21st century

12:21um but what we're going to do is you're

12:23going to learn to deal with any issue

12:26by dealing with the ones that we have

12:28chosen for

12:30this course and so we go into biomedical

12:33ethics and that's

12:34the largest portion of this class

12:36because i have so many students

12:38who are entering the healthcare field

12:41and so i really like to hit this one

12:42hard

12:43plus biomedical issues and biomedical

12:46ethics

12:47are the thing that appeals to our

12:49emotions

12:51the most so if you can learn to conquer

12:54your emotional response

12:55in these few topics you'll be able to

12:57manage that when you

12:58look at other things as well so we're

13:00going to look at informed consent

13:02the hippocratic oath what do those

13:03things mean and what does it mean for

13:05patients

13:07abortion obviously is the probably the

13:10hottest topic

13:12that you can possibly imagine we start

13:14with it

13:15because i want you to learn how to

13:18manage your emotional response before we

13:19go a

13:20step further i also want you to

13:22understand that just because you think

13:24you know about something doesn't mean

13:26you do there's

13:27always room to learn and always room to

13:30change your stances

13:31um i was reading a blog post by one of

13:34my students and he talked about how

13:35drastically his views have changed

13:38as he's gotten older he used to be very

13:40idealistic

13:41and used to vote a certain way and that

13:43everybody should have

13:44and then as he got older things started

13:46to change because he learned more and

13:48more

13:49as you learn your ideas should change

13:52euthanasia assisted suicide um

13:56this one is very emotional for people as

13:58well because a lot of us have watched a

14:00loved one

14:01suffer and wither away and we would

14:04never allow our pets

14:06to suffer the way we allow our family

14:08members to suffer

14:10part of that's because it's the law um

14:12stem cells and cloning this is also a

14:14super hot topic

14:16very complicated and what i did is i've

14:19broken it down as simplistically as i

14:21possibly can so that you have a working

14:23knowledge

14:24of what this is and can then formulate

14:27an opinion

14:29we also deal with environmental ethics

14:31now

14:32environmentalism has been part of your

14:34lives your entire existence you can't

14:36remember before it was a thing

14:39the problem is that

14:43environmentalism has become a huge

14:45money-making

14:47industry huge there's tons of money to

14:50be made

14:51in people's desire to save the

14:54environment

14:55there's a lot you don't know and there's

14:57a lot of guilt you feel

14:59that you shouldn't feel because it's not

15:02your fault it's not america's fault

15:05it's other countries who are committing

15:06a lot of the egregious environmental

15:09acts and terrorism and all those kinds

15:10of things that really are just

15:12destroying some things

15:13so we're going to talk about that too

15:15and we're also going to talk about the

15:16manipulation of statistics

15:20the forest fires in the amazon a couple

15:22years ago

15:25people used photographs from 2012

15:29in order to engage you emotionally so

15:31you would send what

15:33money it's all tied to money and the

15:36last thing we're going to talk about is

15:37business ethics

15:39most of us this is common sense for most

15:41of us

15:42but it becomes a challenge because

15:44businesses have to balance

15:45the needs of their customers the needs

15:47of their shareholders the needs of their

15:48employees the need you know

15:50and they have to run this sort of

15:52gauntlet

15:53of ethical um challenges because they're

15:56trying to satisfy so many different

15:58groups of people

15:59so we're going to talk about business

16:00ethics for a little bit

16:02and go over that

16:05with some specificity to help get you in

16:08line

16:08all right so if we look at our first

16:10we've talked about our our bio

16:12medical ethics this is our first sort of

16:14unit

16:17so let's start with patients rights and

16:20informed consent

16:22um most of us are blinded by the white

16:26coat

16:26when we can see the doctor we assume he

16:29knows what he's talking about we assume

16:31he knows what's best for us

16:32and he says we're going to do and we all

16:35say

16:36okay

16:40okay informed consent is much more

16:42complicated than

16:44okay informed consent means that you

16:47fully understand

16:48the situation the options and the

16:51possible consequences or side effects

16:53of the treatment i hate going to a

16:57doctor's office

16:58and even when they try to talk to me

17:00they use a fifteen dollar word

17:03i don't know what you just said i do not

17:05understand the words coming out of your

17:06mouth

17:09this informed consent is essential to

17:12your

17:12own authority over your body and choices

17:15that you can make

17:18um it goes way beyond you know the the

17:21signing of the piece of paper

17:22and how many forms do you get when you

17:24go to the doctor's office and sign in

17:27all the forms you don't read that

17:30privacy agreement

17:32you just sign it because nobody has time

17:34to read it

17:36we assume that our medical professionals

17:38have our best interests at heart

17:41um it this has two sides

17:45beneficence which is the goal of

17:47medicine to try to help people

17:49and something called non-malfeasance

17:51this is avoiding

17:52harming people and of course all of this

17:56is founded in the hippocratic oath which

17:59all doctors take

18:02and one of the core principles is first

18:05do no harm when you're trying to help

18:07people don't hurt

18:09this do no harm concept is going to run

18:11afoul

18:12of things like euthanasia assisted

18:15suicide

18:16abortion stem cells and cloney

18:20because here's the question

18:23where does that start and stop all right

18:26so here's the hippocratic oath

18:28it is one of the oldest binding

18:30documents in history

18:32it's written by hippocrates which is why

18:34it's called the hippocratic oath

18:36and this link in the powerpoint will

18:38take you

18:41to it and it'll take you to the modern

18:44version

18:44and the classic version so here's the

18:47classic version

18:49no i don't want to do whatever that is

18:51and then here's the modern version

18:54read that and then ask yourself the

18:57question

18:58is it still being respected in the 21st

19:01century

19:02is it still being respected in the 21st

19:05century and i think you'll be surprised

19:07a lot of doctors have great respect for

19:09it but a lot don't

19:11and so you discover how you're treated

19:14if you start measuring your treatment by

19:16the hippocratic oath

19:17you may be very pleased you may be very

19:20disappointed

19:21all right gang so that's it sort of for

19:23our introduction to applied ethics

19:26our first unit is biomedical ethics

19:28informed consent hypocritical we talked

19:30about that today

19:31and then the next video will cover

19:34abortion so

19:34get ready all right gang see you then

More from Samantha Vance

Recently added transcripts

Browse the whole transcript library

This transcript was generated from the captions YouTube publishes for this video. Get the transcript of any YouTube video atfreeyoutubetranscribe.com, free, unlimited, no sign-up.