Full transcript
0:00Samsung Galaxy S26 , Samsung Galaxy S26
0:04Plus , Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra . The 26
0:09is this one with the white back . The 26
0:12Plus is this one with the black back .
0:14And the Ultra is this one with the
0:16purple back , more or less . And look how
0:19it was here . You have to keep cleaning
0:22these cameras all the time . Look how
0:23interesting . That's the downside of
0:25having cameras that protrude from the
0:27body . The main thing here is to tell
0:29you that they are the same phone , right
0:30? So let's start right away . Turning
0:33the three towards you , showing that all
0:36three have the same configurations and
0:38the exact same 33 applications . They
0:42are all updated , as I have already done
0:44several times today . And what a curse ,
0:47the update came again . Put language .
0:51There , for the third time today they
0:53are all updated . And more than that ,
0:54besides being updated , they also have
0:56the system up to date . Software ,
0:59software , software . So , if I close
1:02everything on all three , restart all
1:04three with absolutely everything closed
1:07, all in Nomad Light mode , all
1:09performing that way . Well , look , it's
1:18finished . We even see a score of 3208
1:21on the Ultra and 3258 on the Plus ,
1:23which means they are essentially the
1:26same and within the margin of error ,
1:29right ? And we have 3242 on the regular
1:32S25 , also within the margin of error ,
1:35meaning the same score across all of
1:37them . An important detail : I formatted
1:40them all to have exactly the initial
1:42configuration . That's why if I open
1:44their cameras , they'll give that
1:46first-time access warning . Everything
1:48being accessed for the first time ,
1:49everything starting to work for the
1:51first time . In other words , the
1:53configuration that gives this number is
1:55the factory default . Why did I do this ?
1:58Normally I reduce the number of frames
2:00per second they can produce . Normally I
2:03also reduce the resolution of the Ultra
2:05. So this is the exact experience of
2:07when you haven't touched anything ,
2:08haven't connected anything , haven't
2:09configured anything , you just take it
2:11out of the box and , like , that's it ,
2:13the way Samsung sent it is how I'm
2:14going to use it . Many people use it
2:16like this , if not most people . So these
2:17are the real , real , real numbers . You
2:19can improve them , maybe , for sure . But
2:21this is what they will deliver to you
2:23by default . This objectively
2:25demonstrates that you are no longer
2:28opting for the S26 Ultra over the S26
2:31Plus or the regular S26 . I wanted to
2:34start the video with this because I was
2:35going to repeat this throughout several
2:37moments . Here it is in numbers . Oh , but
2:39you did a specific 3D test . Why don't
2:42you do a real-world test ? And here ,
2:52look how interesting , in a longer test ,
2:55you have a score of 3787 in single core
2:58versus 3218 , 322. That is ,
3:00theoretically the devices that are the
3:02same are the same , but at some points
3:05you see that one performs well , the
3:07other performs well . You said , " Wait a
3:10minute , you stand out for a little fart
3:12in some tasks . " That's precisely the
3:13point of this video that we want to
3:15address with you . The Ultra isn't
3:16better than the others , but the Ultra
3:18isn't the same as the others . But at
3:20this moment you see the regular S26
3:22with a little fart , a tiny bit of a
3:24fart , ahead of the Plus , but the Plus
3:26was better at that moment . What's the
3:28consistency of that ? They are the same
3:30device . They are . Is there a practical
3:31difference between this costing double
3:33and it being only power ? No , but I
3:35needed to start with the myth that I
3:37myself would put here as nonsensical .
3:40It's the same system from the same
3:42manufacturer , identical versions of the
3:44same device in terms of power . There
3:46have been versions like the S24 , which
3:48in my opinion was Samsung's biggest
3:51mistake , launching two mid-range
3:53flagships and only one true flagship .
3:55That's not the case . The S25 was the
3:57same across the three , the S26 is the
3:58same across the three , but you do the
4:00benchmarks and you get this slight
4:02deviation . In an ideal world , the
4:09Galaxy S26 should be the ultimate
4:11Samsung experience , offering everything
4:14you deserve from a top-of-the-line
4:16phone and everything you expect from
4:18the brand in its most compact model .
4:21That hasn't been true for a long time ,
4:24because Samsung has opted for many
4:26years to put more sensors and different
4:29cameras on the Ultra models . This is a
4:32video I didn't make recently , but it's
4:35already been done and diluted among the
4:38thousands of videos on the channel
4:41about the regular Galaxy S22 , 23 , 24 ,
4:4325 , and 26. It's been neglected ,
4:46abandoned by Samsung . And it's always
4:48the same device . What changed in the
4:50camera changed on the Ultra , what had
4:51the best sensor was on the Ultra . It's
4:53as if that device stopped in time and
4:55this one evolved . But many people took
4:58photos with the Galaxy S10 and loved
5:00them , as the S7 was already good , yet
5:03they hold an S26 and cannot even spot
5:05the difference in specifications . That
5:07person is right , the camera has been
5:09professional for so many years that it
5:11makes no difference . This is something
5:13for the person talking to you here .
5:15Subjectively , it's about technology ,
5:17you'll see differences in aperture ,
5:18differences in millimeters of lens
5:20equivalence , you'll see a lot of other
5:22things , but in the end , the photo is
5:23the same , or even better . And in the
5:25middle of all this , the Plus is merely
5:27a larger version of this one . Right .
5:30Right . This Ultra costs twice as much
5:32as this 26 , and this one in the middle
5:35gets lost in the crossfire between them
5:37. In everyday use , in common usage , I
5:39do not believe that a person will feel
5:41any difference of absolutely anything
5:43at all . And what is more , if a person
5:46sets them to computer mode and pushes
5:48them to the limit , they will not reach
5:50the maximum level of power that those
5:52units are capable of delivering .
5:53Playing heavy games , on Star Rail or
5:56similar , or even playing Call of Duty
5:58or similar games for a long time , I
6:01also don't think you'll feel any
6:03difference , because they are
6:05ridiculously above what's necessary for
6:07a cell phone to even exist in 2026.
6:10Right ? The only issue is when you get
6:12to the store , everything I said falls
6:13apart because someone comes up and says
6:14: " Which one do you want ? " And shows it
6:17to you . At that moment , it seems like
6:18three different sizes , and that's it .
6:20You want the small , the medium , the
6:21large . But that decision sometimes
6:24involves a jump from 5,000 to 11,000 .
6:28And that's the worst price I've seen ,
6:29okay ? I know the prices aren't really
6:30like that . I've found the smallest for
6:323,000 and the largest for 5,000 , but
6:34that's with promotions , cashback ,
6:36scratching your back , slapping your
6:38face , and other things . There are
6:40promotional groups , we've posted about
6:41them several times , there's the IR Code
6:42appearing or there's the link to click
6:43in the description , there's always
6:45something there , you can buy anything .
6:46There are iPhones too , naturally ,
6:48obviously , there's nothing Samsung in
6:50the mix . And that's it , the point is
6:51that maybe you have to choose between
6:53them and it becomes a bit ambiguous ,
6:55like , " But I have some extra money , I
6:57only want to change my phone in 5 years
6:59. Maybe it's worth paying a little more
7:01now for the one that offers a little
7:02more and have a better one for longer . "
7:04With that kind of reasoning , it might
7:05make sense . Okay , so what hasn't
7:07changed ? If you choose any of these , or
7:09a Galaxy A 07 — yes , I know . A Galaxy
7:12A07 , look , these are phones that
7:14Samsung is offering an absurd update
7:17policy for . So , the S24 , S25 , and S26
7:20were all launched with 7 years of
7:22updates . That is , there are 5 years of
7:25updates left with the S24 , and 6 years
7:27left because it will be seven minus the
7:29days and months that have already
7:31passed . So , there are 6 years and 6
7:33months of upgrades remaining for them .
7:36In short , it's 7 years on the day of
7:37launch . So that's the logic , right ? But
7:39anyway , whichever one you pick up ,
7:41thinking , if I pick up one of these
7:43phones , will it last a long time ? Yes .
7:45Obviously , it can fall from your hand ,
7:47break the next day , and you'll think , "
7:48Oh , it had 7 years of updates , but it
7:50broke . " But they all have some greater
7:51resistance . That's what I'm doing . This
7:55is a wooden table , so it doesn't hurt
7:56to do this . Wooden tables don't break
7:58phones . They all have water resistance .
8:00We're tired of making videos about this
8:01on the Tech channel . I think the last
8:03three years have been spent throwing
8:04phones in the water , and for the last
8:05six years it's been common to throw
8:07phones in the water , so it's gotten old
8:08, it's become tiresome . So , in this
8:09video , we'll focus more on whether we
8:12have the same device or not . Extra
8:14cameras for depth detection . When I
8:17look at the Ultra's specs , going down
8:20to the S26 Ultra , when we get to the
8:22camera section , laser autofocus . In
8:25practice , those who use these sensors
8:27here , when taking a photo , achieve a
8:29focus that is slightly better , a bit
8:31faster , and a little more precise
8:32overall . It's something marginally used
8:35by phones most of the time . Obviously ,
8:37it's more precise here , but I'd be
8:39exaggerating to say that your average
8:41day-to-day experience will change a lot
8:43with these extra cameras . What changes
8:46significantly between them is what I
8:48said : the 50 megapixel aperture 1.8 is
8:51identical in both the normal and the
8:53Plus . And this has been going on for a
8:56long time , even excessively so on
8:58Samsung's part , because they managed to
9:00put this 200 - megapixel module in the
9:02S26 Ultra . That was back in the S25 era
9:04, of course . In the thinner version ,
9:06remember there was a thinner S25 that
9:08isn't here because it doesn't exist in
9:10the S26 line ? Look at that . It would be
9:13possible to update this camera module .
9:15It just doesn't happen . The difference
9:17is that this f / 1.4 aperture in the
9:20Ultra allows for even more advanced
9:22night photos . 200 megapixels gives even
9:25more room for maneuver , better cropping
9:27, and assists with the zoom mix mix mix
9:30zoom . In short , it uses real zoom and
9:32fake zoom on a giant sensor with a good
9:35lens . It mixes the makeshift with the
9:37real thing , and in reality , it results
9:39in a great zoomed photo . It achieves a
9:41decent zoom . I'm not talking about the
9:43moon zoom that people make memes about
9:44putting things in . I'm talking about
9:46zooming in on normal objects with
9:47decent readability and definition , you
9:49know ? So , in fact , a large sensor helps
9:51a lot to compensate for the lack of a
9:53lens sticking out . This lens down here
9:55is , in fact , a periscope . It actually
9:57achieves 5x optical zoom , which goes to
9:59more than 5x , almost 10x because the
10:02sensor is so good and all that , blah
10:04blah blah . Anyway , I already complained
10:06about this on the S23 Ultra , which had
10:08a true 10x zoom versus the S24 , 25 , and
10:1126 , which isn't a true 10x , but it's
10:13like a 10x
10:14flavor of 10x .
10:15Everything I've said here is a load of
10:17nonsense for anyone who's going to do
10:18this here . Wow ! Did you see anything in
10:23the simulation that made a difference
10:24having a periscope ? Do you understand
10:27that , like , the practice among them of
10:30having a 12 - megapixel 2.2 - megapixel
10:32front camera on the Ultra , the gigantic
10:35one that costs twice as much , being the
10:38same thing , the same crap on the S26
10:41Plus and the normal S26 that I have in
10:44my hand , makes it clear that it's
10:46unjustifiable and not even
10:48imperceptible ; the difference is
10:51nonexistent . Why did I say crap ?
10:53Because Apple , the slowest company on
10:56the planet to adopt trends , literally
10:59takes half a decade to do things that
11:01others do . It has a front-facing camera
11:04with center stage . The person takes a
11:07picture , their camera appears and
11:08adjusts for the group . Then the camera
11:10zooms out automatically , the front
11:13camera frames , changes the aspect ratio
11:15, zooms out again , because Apple , Apple
11:17innovated . Look at this absurdity ,
11:20Apple innovated and put a sensor on the
11:22front that is brutally better ,
11:24technically , mathematically better than
11:26Samsung , which used to be a leader in
11:29innovation and hasn't been for a long
11:31time . And it gets a high-definition
11:33photo , high resolution , everything
11:36high-definition , with automatic
11:38centering , with automatic panorama
11:40simulation . In other words , Samsung is
11:42eating so much dust that it's a Sahara
11:44Desert of dust in the front camera of
11:46its most expensive and powerful phone .
11:49Taking home an Ultra doesn't change
11:51your front camera at all .
11:53Buy an iPhone , buy an iPhone , buy an
11:56iPhone . Listen to my voice , close this
12:00video , go to the App Store and buy an
12:03iPhone . Do
12:04you understand what I mean ? It's
12:05relative , so you see all these specs
12:07here , all these details about the main
12:09camera . The front camera is the same .
12:11It's quite an unbalanced technology we
12:13have between them here , right ? Another
12:16unbalanced thing is that they all have
12:1812GB of RAM ; there's no option with
12:2016GB , except for the version I know of ,
12:22which is only sold in Korea , at least
12:24it was in South Korea , the Ultra
12:26version has 16GB . I've never seen a
12:28serious discussion about having 16GB of
12:30RAM in the others , when other devices
12:33that are market leaders , these are the
12:35most powerful Samsung phones , have 16GB
12:37of RAM . I understand that the end user
12:39won't stumble over this , but why can I
12:41get a cheaper Xiaomi with more memory ?
12:43That's the only question I'm leaving
12:45here . Storage , they all start at 256GB .
12:48Many people have the 512GB version
12:49because there's a promotion at the
12:51beginning of the year when Samsung
12:52sells them only with 512GB for the same
12:54price . Oh , of course , there's an
12:55exception . The standard S26 starts at
12:58128GB , then 256GB , and later reaches
13:00512GB . We already have the 256GB
13:02scalability here . It should be the same
13:04here , only 256GB . If it has 128GB ,
13:05we'll sell the 128GB version ,
13:06unfortunately . And the experience will
13:08be compromised because the system is
13:10large , the photo and video files are
13:11large . 128GB on a top-of-the-line phone
13:13doesn't even make sense for this level
13:15of device where you'll download and use
13:17a lot of things and it will produce
13:19many gigabytes of files . Given this ,
13:21considering the prices you'll see , we
13:24have here , as a filter of reality , the
13:27Galaxy S26 with an absurd price of R $
13:296,411 . The price it has already reached
13:34so far based on normal records , without
13:36considering ultra-promotions , there are
13:38promotions that are impossible to be
13:39serious about . It was a coupon that
13:42said " more for less 9914 " along with
13:46cashback . I had to buy it inside an
13:48Ipiranga gas station while looking at
13:50the Shell station with my Mercado Livre
13:52wallet , the Shopee coupon , and
13:54redeeming it on Amazon . Then you think :
13:56" Man , that makes it difficult . " There
13:57were 25 necessary conditions , only two
13:59units were discounted , and you had to
14:00be there on a Tuesday morning doing
14:02this to be able to buy it . Man , it's
14:04not right to use that price . That price
14:06is a lie . You did it , congrats , it
14:08doesn't cost that much . There are
14:10always people in the comments hindering
14:12the purchase decision . It doesn't cost
14:13that much , it costs that much , and that
14:15price is bad . That's why we wait for an
14:17insane promotion to buy . The S26 costs
14:205 P , it's too expensive . There's even a
14:23price alert saying it's expensive . The
14:25S26 Plus price , price , price , it held
14:29even more , even more , even more . It was
14:32recorded as hitting R $ 6,000 . The
14:36Ultra , the Galaxy S26 , the Ultra , it
14:39had prices of 10,000 , 10,000 , 9,000 ,
14:4110,000 . For a long time it was around
14:459,000 , 1,000 , and at some very strange
14:47point it even hit 6,600 . So , speaking
14:50seriously , where it's 6,600 here , the
14:53other one is 5,600 ; it has been cheaper
14:56than that , the regular S26 . It wasn't
14:59registered in the official prices here ,
15:01but I've seen it cheaper than that . So ,
15:03ideally , for the S26 , the price would
15:06be a horrible 3,000-4,000 for the S26 ,
15:104,000 - something , 4,500 , 4,700 for the
15:13S26 Plus , 6,000 for the S26 Ultra .
15:17These aren't good prices , but they are
15:18the prices you find most of the year .
15:20Today , it appears to be at a good price
15:22, but it's not really at a good price ,
15:25is it ? Definitely not at a good price ,
15:27but the difference is significant . 6700
15:29, 7300 , 10300. In other words , you
15:32could say they're almost double the
15:35price , and the Plus is somewhere in
15:38between . I have a problem with that .
15:41The Plus isn't even close to what the
15:46Ultra offers . Why ? Because they have
15:49the exact same processor , they all cost
15:52the same . Let's say they cost R $ 4,000
15:54. Because of that processor , they all
15:56cost R $ 4,000 . This one is small ,
15:58medium , large . Oops . So , since the
16:00screen changes , then there's a little
16:02extra price , a little extra price . The
16:04battery is also small , medium , large .
16:07Wrong answer , man . The battery of the
16:10Plus and the battery of the Ultra , in
16:13my opinion , is the same . Why ? The size
16:17difference between them is huge . 100
16:19mAh is nothing . So , 4900 mAh is already
16:23insufficient and not good . Samsung uses
16:26a very heavy system , the processor is
16:29very powerful , and the tasks you
16:31perform also require 4900 mAh of
16:33battery , which is totally below normal .
16:35Today we talk about 6 and 7000 mAh
16:37batteries . This has been outdated for
16:40years . Every year I criticize this
16:42battery . Oh , but it has more than last
16:44year . I don't care . I'm talking about
16:46the S26 , S26 Plus , and S26 . Let's focus
16:49on that . Between them , 4900 mAh to 5000
16:51mAh . You won't feel the difference , but
16:55there's an abysmal price jump . So , when
16:57you pay more for this one than that one
16:59and see the price of this one close to
17:01that one , what are you paying extra for
17:04? The larger screen size , of course .
17:06But here the screen size increases and
17:08the price jump isn't the same ? Is it
17:09only because of the cameras ? I would
17:12say it's because of the cameras and
17:13this . Some people have never taken the
17:15S Pen from their phone , never . So , if
17:18you don't even intend to use this , if
17:20you're not looking at this pen and
17:22don't know about the 20 videos we've
17:25already made about the SPN , which have
17:27explained all its features , explained
17:29that some features were removed in the
17:32S25 Ultra and that they remain removed
17:34in the S26 Ultra , and so on , if you
17:36have no idea what I'm talking about ,
17:39then it's not for you . So , the price
17:41jump from here to here is very much
17:43tied to the engineering of a feature
17:46that many people won't even use . Oh ,
17:48but they have fast charging , right ?
17:50It's 25W on the S26 , it's 45W on the
17:54S26 Plus , and it's 60W on the S26 Ultra
17:58. I agree . The fast charging varies
18:01between them . They would all be capable
18:03of supporting it , but some engineering ,
18:06safety , or segmentation decision left
18:08fast charging only on the Ultra . And
18:11it's fast in terms of speed because the
18:13norm is 90W , 120W , you see 60W fast
18:15charging in notebooks as standard for a
18:18while now , so you wait , it's fast , it's
18:20just not revolutionary , it's fast . Here
18:23it ends up being an extra , but is the
18:25price jump between them justified
18:27because of that ? However , there's the
18:29last feature , which in my opinion here
18:31is purely subjective , and doesn't
18:33justify any upgrade . This is a moment
18:35when you say : " Wow , Samsung has to
18:37innovate , it has to launch things that
18:40make you want to have a new device . "
18:42What they did this year for that was
18:44this , which is the privacy screen . This
18:46is a physical feature . Samsung made
18:48something that , inside the screen , is
18:50physical ; there's a part of the screen
18:52that's flat and a part of the screen
18:54that's open . So , when you turn this on ,
18:57you turn off part of the screen and
18:59only the parts that point straight
19:01ahead remain . So much so that , if you
19:02notice , it loses brightness . I don't
19:04know if it's as noticeable on our
19:06camera , but visually , it's very
19:07noticeable here with me that it gets
19:09darker . But anyway , you leave the
19:11privacy screen function activated so
19:13that part of the screen becomes
19:15invisible by turning it sideways . It's
19:17a really cool feature . I've never seen
19:19it anywhere else . Inside the house ,
19:21while I'm just wearing those old ,
19:24worn-out 15 - year-old pants , all sloppy ,
19:27with a dirty shirt , the TV on YouTube ,
19:30while I eat half a pizza and I'm like
19:33this with my cell phone , look : what did
19:36this feature add to my life ?
19:39A waste of time .
19:40Do you understand what I mean ? It's
19:41situational , it's extremely useful for
19:44some situations , for some people , for
19:46some professions . In everyday , mundane
19:49life , this feature is completely and
19:52objectively useless . It's very cool to
19:55have and showing people that you have
19:57this feature is also super fun , but is
20:00it worth paying extra to have this
20:02display with this privacy matrix , you
20:04know what this is ? This is a feature
20:06that only Samsung has . They're going to
20:08put it on the market and see if it
20:09makes them sell a lot . People will say ,
20:11" Damn , this is essential . " If it
20:13becomes essential , they'll offer it on
20:14everything . If it doesn't become
20:16essential , they'll say , " Hey , we put it
20:18on the S26 Ultra , it was cool , nobody
20:19cared , so we're not going to put it on
20:21the others . " Anyway , it's a necessary
20:23test and it deserves all the praise .
20:25Like Samsung , you deserve praise for
20:27doing this . You had the courage to put
20:30it on the market , and that's what keeps
20:32brands innovative . You deserve praise
20:34for doing this . Nobody else did this . I
20:36set the maximum protection . You can set
20:38it to activate only when you open , for
20:40example , your Itaú , Santander , or Nob
20:41app , or whatever else you might want to
20:43choose . You can set it only for
20:44notifications , only a part of the
20:45display does that . But anyway , you can
20:47set various conditions . I'll leave it
20:48here in the normal way , just so you
20:50understand how it works . The screen
20:51becomes horribly low quality ; it's not
20:53for use all the time , it's only for
20:55when you use it . Leave it on automatic
20:57for security apps , like , oh , WhatsApp .
21:00Just for WhatsApp , for example , so
21:01nobody can look . And when you have
21:03WhatsApp open , this is your WhatsApp .
21:05Check out what happens , you see ? My
21:10screen becomes invisible . Given the
21:13real value between them , I understand
21:14that the Ultra has always been very
21:15expensive . You're already getting a lot
21:17more for these two . The difference is
21:19the pen . Then you add that to the price
21:21. It's the better camera , you add that
21:23to the price . You have the privacy
21:24screen which is better , you add that to
21:25the price . Okay ? Is that enough for you
21:28to pay double for this one ? This is the
21:31calculation to be made . 6.3 inches , 6.7
21:38inches , 6.9 inches . Yes , they have an
21:41extremely similar size , but one is
21:44bulky and the other isn't . They all
21:46have the problem of the protruding
21:47camera , they all have water resistance .
21:49You'll hear someone lying about
21:51something they don't . And this is a
21:53conversation we've been having for half
21:54a decade here and I'm not going to
21:55waste my time , okay ? So , I'm going to
21:57lie to you about several things
21:58regarding water resistance , and they
22:00are all IP68 rated equally . Despite the
22:02resistance , I don't see any record of
22:05them going in the direction that Apple ,
22:07I mean , in a way , not just Apple , the
22:10entire Chinese industry , and Apple ,
22:12went in having absurdly high impact
22:15resistance . So they are resistant
22:17phones , yes , but they aren't
22:19ultra-resistant military-grade like
22:21some Chinese phones are . What am I
22:24going to do ? I'm going to restart all
22:28three and do a thermal stability test .
22:31They're all here in the exact same
22:33place , in the exact same air
22:35conditioning , on the exact same table ,
22:37and we'll see which one heats up the
22:39most during the test . Look , don't
22:41simulate yourself in the sun with the
22:43device , don't simulate yourself with
22:45your emails , with WhatsApp , with
22:47anything else , along with Instagram ,
22:49along with Facebook , along with you
22:51editing on Instagram , along with you
22:53doing a bunch of things with the GPS
22:55open and everything else . No , I can't
22:57simulate that . An interesting detail ,
22:59since they come from the factory with
23:01the same thing , okay ? Both have Full HD
23:02Plus , meaning it is the same resolution
23:05. I know it's Full HD here , a bit less
23:07than " plus , " but only because it's not
23:08as long . So , in practice , they're all
23:10at the same resolution . Let's see which
23:12ones degrade more . And that's it . While
23:15they're testing , looking at the back of
23:17the Ultra , remember , it's a 200
23:18megapixel main camera versus 50 on the
23:20smaller ones . They all have optical
23:22image stabilization , they all have a
23:25second 10 megapixel camera with an f /
23:272.4 aperture for 3x simple zoom , but
23:30only the Ultra has an additional 5x
23:32optical zoom camera , another 50
23:35megapixels , f / 2.9 aperture , and their
23:37ultrawide is different . It's a smaller
23:4012 megapixel f / 2.2 versus a 50
23:43megapixel f / 1.9 ultrawide on our
23:46beloved Ultra , which also works for
23:49macro photos . So this camera is much
23:51more useful , more versatile than it
23:53seems . If you use the ultrawide angle a
23:55lot , great , you'll see a significant
23:56difference with the Ultra . If you're
23:58obsessed with zoom , zoom , zoom , you're
24:00really into ultra mode , because
24:01everything else is the same , you
24:03already know . The main camera does make
24:05a difference , but it is not a terrible
24:07camera on the Plus or the regular . It's
24:10inferior , but it's not a bad camera .
24:12That's very important . It would be
24:14unfair to say it is . And everyone
24:15shoots little videos in 8K . Be happy
24:17and use 4K on the front camera . You can
24:19use their front camera as much as you
24:20want . Very well , test completed , and
24:38look at this interesting thing .
24:42Stability . Do you know what this is ?
24:44We've shown it in other videos . For
24:45those who have never seen it , this
24:47means that the phone lost 40 % of its
24:49power during the test . This is normal .
24:52Samsung does it this way , Samsung
24:54operates this way , it's by design , they
24:56are excessively conservative with their
24:59devices . You see , the Red Magic shows
25:02the other side of things . It allows the
25:06phone to overheat in exchange for
25:08having 10 % or 5 % more power . The result
25:11is that it burns your hand , but it
25:12delivers more power . So , if you notice
25:15the first test , their initial
25:17performance , 3200 , 3100 , and at the end
25:202000 , meaning they're overheated ,
25:23they're still hot , just a little , but
25:26they are . From 3200 they reach 2000 ,
25:291900 and something in performance . In
25:32other words , if you're playing your
25:34game , your game will become slower
25:36after 20 minutes . Yes . How much slower
25:38will it become ? If the game is using
25:40100 % of the processor , it will become 40
25:43% slower . No game uses 100 % , just so you
25:45know . Let's see here . This is the part
25:47where Samsung is conservative . I
25:49believe that after the Galaxy Note 7
25:51problem , Samsung didn't just take one
25:53security measure , they took 18 or 20 ,
25:55because they must be afraid that what
25:57happened with the Galaxy Note 7 will
25:59happen again . If you don't remember ,
26:02the Galaxy Note 7 was even a mod in GTA
26:04, where it replaced C4 . The character
26:07gets a Galaxy Note 7 , throws it , and
26:09look what happens . Exactly . And even
26:11today , the Galaxy Note 7 is banned in
26:12international flights and so on .
26:14Because of this , I believe that Samsung
26:16will choose to take double the security
26:19measures so that there is not even the
26:21slightest possibility of this happening
26:23again . Therefore , excessive security
26:26ends up impacting performance or
26:28causing significant slowdowns in
26:30innovation . As a result , these two
26:32didn't even reach 45º . They all
26:35started at the same temperature , and
26:36they're all in the same battery range ,
26:38which is very good . To give you an idea
26:41, phones like this , in these tests ,
26:43usually consistently reach 50º .
26:45Samsung never lets it reach 50 , never .
26:47I've never seen these devices in
26:49Samsung's tests reach 50 in recent
26:51years . They freeze , like , it hits 45 at
26:54most or doesn't let it reach 45. Well ,
26:57now giving my opinion , okay ? My opinion
27:00as someone who might be looking at one
27:02of the three to buy , I would never buy
27:04Exos because of everything I've already
27:06said here on the channel . I absolutely
27:08insist that it be Snapdragon or
27:11Mediatek . I don't accept Exinos because
27:14the programs I normally use have some
27:17issue with the custom GPU or some error
27:21that , when publishing to the store ,
27:24when you compile , it didn't mark that
27:27it should also support Exinos . So ,
27:29based on nothing and only on my feeling
27:33, you know , that emotional , irrational
27:36thing , I don't use Exinos . But the
27:39results say I'm wrong . And it's very
27:42important for us to have the
27:44transparency to come and say : " Look ,
27:45everything indicates that I'm
27:47absolutely wrong and that it's just an
27:49impression , nonsense , something of mine
27:51, and there's no justification for me
27:52to say this . " And the worst part is
27:54that I can't even question , for example
27:56, the camera . Samsung cameras , they've
27:57always been a leader in cameras , and
27:59there was a time when they only had
28:00Exinus at the top of the line , and that
28:02was always when they were also a leader
28:04in cameras . So not even that . The ISP ,
28:06their image signal processor , is
28:09obviously very good in Exinus . That's
28:11something when you looked at Unisock ,
28:13Mediatek , Qualcomm , you'd wonder , which
28:15one of them has an OK ISP ? Samsung
28:17never had that problem with image
28:19quality . Look , it was more in terms of
28:21thermal issues and lower-than-expected
28:23power . It's even difficult like this ,
28:24you know ? What do we have here ? We have
28:27little innovation ; our product line is
28:29stagnant compared to last year . In a
28:32three-way comparison , there are many
28:35ties , the same system , the same
28:38features as the A series , but this
28:41Ultra here has three real physical
28:45differences . The screen is different
28:48here , a different camera module is
28:50installed here , and the pen is
28:52physically present only here and inside
28:55the body . And some people also ask
28:58about whether the screen has a special
29:00treatment to feel the pen . Not just
29:02anything feels the pen touching the
29:04screen . Honestly , if you don't , I stand
29:07by what I said . If you don't see value
29:09in the Ultra's physical features ,
29:11there's no reason for you to choose it .
29:13But I can't defend such a drastic price
29:15difference between the Plus and the
29:16regular model . The Plus is the obvious
29:18choice because it has a bit more
29:20battery life compared to the regular
29:21model . Right ? Right ? And that's good
29:23for longevity . The fewer times it
29:25discharges during the day , the more
29:27years it lasts . The less you have to
29:29charge it , the less wear and tear the
29:30battery will have . Please don't
29:31misunderstand , okay ? There are a lot of
29:33suckers who will try to take advantage
29:35of you and trick you , telling you that
29:37if you charge your phone twice a day ,
29:38you've completed two cycles . No. Your
29:40phone is at 40 % , charging it to 80 % is
29:42all . That's 0.4 cycles . Anyway , the
29:46less frequent charging , the better . So ,
29:50the Plus should be the main model , but
29:52it's disproportionately priced compared
29:54to the regular one . I can't find that
29:56justification knowing that both have
29:58the same processor , much less looking
30:00at the Ultra and knowing how much of a
30:03price difference there is between the
30:05processors , which Samsung pays a third
30:07party to , Qualcomm , to buy . Here , they
30:10pay for their own processor . But you
30:11also have to consider that in the S25
30:13they were the same and the prices were
30:14different . It's very complicated . In
30:16Brazil , all three S25 models used
30:19Snapdragon . This year , since the
30:21differences between them are very few ,
30:23they are well made , this is being
30:25talked about little , but last year you
30:27had Snapdragon in the most basic one
30:29and it was cheap , I even found the
30:30regular S25 for 3,000 . Between the
30:32three , which one to buy ? Honestly , if
30:34you have the money , obviously the Ultra
30:36is the best option . Last year I said
30:38the S25 was the best option . This year ,
30:41being Exnos , I don't see it as the best
30:43option , but it is , okay ? It is
30:45objectively the best option . If you are
30:47an advanced user , you will open
30:49terminals on your phone , you will do
30:51things that might actually make a
30:53difference . Its drivers , it's good to
30:55stay on a larger platform . Qualcomm is
30:58a larger platform than Exnos . Fewer
31:00devices use Exnos , more devices use
31:02Snapdragon . That's objective . But if
31:04you're not an advanced user and don't
31:06know what I'm talking about , man , it's
31:08unfair to say it's bad because it's not
31:10. We'll end this video as I go abroad ;
31:12I'm going to take the photos I always
31:13take with all three devices , and from
31:15there , you can see if you noticed much
31:17of a difference , because the difference
31:19is very significant in the Ultra's
31:21camera ; The camera is the same on Plus
31:22and regular models . So the difference
31:25in the photos is noticeable . To save
31:28time , I'm only going to take photos
31:30with the regular S25 . Since the Plus
31:32has the exact same camera , there's no
31:34point in taking the same photos
31:35repeatedly , and it's just the S25 vs.
31:37S25 photos . I keep saying this , but you
31:40noticed how it feels to put the S26 on
31:42when I say S25 , right ? It's crazy .
31:44There's no point in comparing the
31:45camera of the S26 Plus , the regular S26
31:48versus the Ultra , because they're the
31:50same camera . So it's half screen , half
31:52screen , just the regular S26 and the
31:54Ultra . It's better . I'm going to
31:55discard the Plus photos because it's
31:57unnecessary . It will clutter your
31:58entire screen . Go abroad and fix that
32:00for 3,000 , which is the most aggressive
32:03price I've ever seen for the FE . And
32:06the most aggressive price I've seen for
32:08the S25 , I think the S26 makes sense ,
32:10but I would opt for the regular S25
32:12because it's Snapdragon , but it's
32:14inferior . The S25 you're talking about ,
32:16the previous one from last year , it's
32:18inferior . You would opt for ... I would
32:20opt for ... because it's my choice , it's
32:22based on nothing , it's a stupid choice
32:24of mine and I would get less power , but
32:26it's because there are many years of
32:28tests of the Exinus being either
32:30inferior or overheating . It's not
32:32inferior and it's not overheating , but
32:34it takes a long time for the trauma to
32:36pass . It takes a while for trauma to go
32:38. So , look , you're listening to someone
32:41admitting they're wrong about the
32:42camera and that you shouldn't do what
32:44I'm advising you . I'm differentiating
32:46my personal experience from the
32:47laboratory test . In the laboratory test
32:49it's perfect , it's impeccable . I'm
32:50using the Adreno Bridge S26 , I'm going
32:53outside now with the 26 and the ultra .
32:55Then we'll do the camera tests there ,
32:56put it nicely for you , you'll have a
32:58legend to tell you which is which .
32:59You're going to hear that nice little
33:00tune that our editors will leave for
33:02you . And that's it , okay ? You watch it
33:03and let me know if you prefer a certain
33:05result or if you didn't see enough
33:07difference in the ultra mode , because
33:08we know that the ultra mode is superior
33:10. Yes , it's like , much superior . Ah ,
33:14I'm going to take a picture the way it
33:15appeared on the interface , okay ? I know
33:16about the 3x and 5x cameras , but as it
33:18lacks them , it makes no difference .
33:19There comes a point where you lose it .
33:20So , at one point in a photo , another
33:23wide-angle option appears here for you :
33:251x , 2x , 3x , 5x , 10x . I'm going to
33:28respect this number here and that's how
33:29it's going to be . The photograph will
33:31be like this . Let's go and you leave
33:33your conclusion . 빵 오 ту . 빵 ту
34:31빵 ту 빵 ту 빵 тукату .
35:15everyone .