Free YouTube Transcribe

Video transcript

Conflict In Relationships

Tony Smith · 5,711 words · 26 min read

WhatsAppTelegramX

Want to search this transcript, jump the video from any line, or download it as TXT, SRT, or VTT?

Open in the transcript tool

Full transcript

0:00Good day to you. I hope you're doing well. Let's jump into the section on conflict.

0:06It's a really important section because there's potential for conflict in all relationships. So,

0:11we'll dive into that and cover intimacy, self-disclosure, and mainly dealing with

0:17conflict in relationships. And we'll cover people's styles of behavior that might influence

0:22how they approach and try to resolve conflict. Some are good and others, not so much. So,

0:28again, let's dive in, with the objective being to learn how self-disclosure and conflict management

0:34influence relationships in positive or negative ways. Self-disclosure and privacy. We covered

0:41self-disclosure in our previous VA. Privacy, that's the right people have to NOT self-disclose,

0:48to keep their thoughts, info, feelings -- you name it -- to themselves. It's basically the

0:54right people have to remain SILENT. And we're big in America on rights of self-expression. “I can

1:00say that. I can say this.” Again, “I’m not going to silence my voice.” We have the right to express

1:06ourselves, but people sometimes forget we have the right to remain silent and NOT self-disclose,

1:12and make the conscious, deliberate choice to not reveal information. “This one I'm keeping. This

1:20one's just for me. This one I'm not putting out there. I am NOT going to self-disclose this.”

1:25That is managing privacy, which I just said: conscious, deliberate choice to withhold and

1:32not self-disclose. And sometimes that is the ideal thing to do. That's the best way to go,

1:38by far, in some situations. Masking feelings. Here we're concealing the verbal and nonverbal cues or

1:45signals that would allow our partners or people we know to understand what we're thinking or how

1:50we're feeling at the time. So, it's considered unhealthy and ineffective if we're dealing with

1:55conflict. In just limited situations, that being if for whatever the reason or circumstances,

2:02you cannot self-disclose this at the time, this could not come out, and the only way for that

2:08to happen is to mask or hide feelings, well, okay, but that should be a limited thing. If

2:14we're ALWAYS masking or hiding, at its core, it's deceptive and it keeps others from helping us or

2:21even recognizing or realizing we might need help or have issues or things are going on. So, it's

2:27considered something you don't want to do on the regular. Displaying feelings. There's a balance

2:32between the two because displaying feelings can be a strong release for our emotions. It can be

2:37cathartic. It can let us get help because now, people know we need it. If we don't ask for it

2:43or display our emotions, how are we supposed to get the help we might need or even advice we could

2:48use? On the other hand, if people over-display and it seems like they're displaying way too much, too

2:55often -- you might know people like this in your life where it seems like everything -- I don't

3:00care what it is -- every little thing they have to blurt out exactly how they feel, what they think.

3:06“Well, I feel this way. Well, I don't like this. Well, this is lame. Well, that's ridiculous.”

3:11They can't ever NOT say anything, right? They can't ever NOT disclose their feelings and

3:17emotions. Basically, they can't keep anything to themselves. That can be frustrating,

3:23too. That could be a strain as well. And you might think from time to time with those people, “Gee,

3:28can't you keep anything to yourself? Do you always have to act like you're the whole world?” So,

3:34that could be an issue as well. There's a balance there, again, between the two. So the guidelines

3:40again, the guidelines for expressing ourselves or self-disclosure, that's why they're there.

3:48They're often valuable. Constructive criticism. Now, here, we're trying to help someone improve

3:54something with themselves or their life. If it's a relationship and their behavior is hurting or

3:59damaging it, we're trying to let them know that and basically help them get on the right track.

4:04“Let's resolve this. Let me help you.” But right now, there's an issue that's different than just

4:09criticism. The main difference -- in fact, chief difference -- is it's constructive. Constructive

4:15criticism is trying to help or improve. Criticism doesn't really care about that. In fact, criticism

4:22might be designed to hurt someone or bring them down. It doesn't care. Whereas constructive,

4:28“Yeah, I might be upset, but let's try to work. I want to help you. I want this to get better.

4:35I want you, in that sense, to get better or fix this. So, I'm going to try to help.” If

4:40you need to give constructive criticism in relationships, these things can help. One,

4:45it says seek permission first. Seek permission. Now, the idea is people are more inclined to

4:53listen and follow through with constructive criticism if they gave you permission because

4:58then, they can't really say, "Oh, well, you know, how dare you” or “I can't believe you said it."

5:05“Well, you said I could. You basically…you opened the door. You gave me permission.” But you can't

5:10always do this because in some cases, people might not know that they need constructive criticism.

5:16Well, if I don't know, I'm not going to ask for it. And if I don't know, I might not be as

5:22inclined to give permission because I might think you're wrong. You know, I'm right, you're wrong,

5:26you're just off. So, in some cases, you can bypass that one and skip it. But if you do that,

5:31you might say, "Look, I know you didn't ask for this, and you might not want to hear it, but we

5:36got to talk about this. We got to talk about what happened last night or what was said. All right?”

5:42At least then, it's a heads up. So, fair warning. The second: specifically describe the problem

5:48behavior or the issue without judging the person. And that's where things get hard because if you've

5:54been hurt or feel wronged, it's really tempting to hurt them and get them back and make them feel

5:59bad, too. The same way they made YOU feel. The issue is that's not going to resolve the actual

6:05issue itself. That's just going to hurt them back. When they get mad, say something back, now you're

6:10REALLY mad. You say something extra mean back. Now, we're just we're just basically throwing

6:15sticks at each other. It's not going to resolve the issue. So, do your best to focus on the issue

6:21without judging the person as far as what they said or what they did. But if you approach it

6:26as far as “You're so stupid and selfish and just completely naive and utterly insanely,

6:32ridiculously wrong and off and just…” No. Okay? Let's get to the specific issue overall because

6:42at that point, you're just saying, "Yeah, you're a jerk and I don't like you right now." Well,

6:48okay, but what's the issue? Let's get beyond that. Okay? And keep in mind, too, people are more than

6:54what they do. We are more than our mistakes. We are more than our faults. If I asked you,

7:00“You done something stupid before in life,” you'd probably say, "Yeah.” I mean, I have too, right?"

7:05If I said, "Oh, so you're a stupid person." Well, NO. That's not fair to say. It'd be like saying,

7:11"You done something mean before?" Well, yeah. I think we all have. “Oh, so you're a lousy,

7:16mean person, huh? That's how you are.” No, we are more than what we do. So, give people the

7:24grace in remembering that. That can help a lot in that particular scenario. For number three,

7:30preface or start off constructive criticism with a positive or affirming statement if you can. The

7:37idea is if we can start with something nice that's true, it can be a cushion for something negative

7:42to come. As long as it's honest, then that's all right. In fact, there's a Sandwich Model. It's

7:48called the Sandwich Model, where businesses often use this where you start with something nice,

7:53you bring out the negative, then you end with something nice as well. So, a sandwich basically,

7:58right? Nice, negative, nice, and there's your sandwich, with the whole idea being people can

8:04better take negative if they have something nice or positive to start off with. The exceptions are

8:10if you can't think of anything nice, don't just make something up. Or if you know the person and

8:16their style and they don't like sandwiches -- and some folks don't. Their view is just, “Give it to

8:21me straight. Go right to the negative. Be blunt. Give it to me direct.” If that's how they are,

8:26then let them have it. When appropriate, suggest how the person can change or improve

8:31their behavior. That one's crucial because the whole point of constructive criticism is

8:37to help someone. If you're not giving advice to help or offering ways they can help themselves,

8:43what value is it? What's it really worth? In fact, that could make things WORSE. It'd be like,

8:49let's say, in a class setting, I dismiss class. You're heading out. I call you back. I say, "Hey,

8:54come see me for a second, okay?" And you come see me and I say, "Yeah, I'm concerned about

8:58your grade in here. It looks like you're going to fail the class. Looks like you're going to fail.

9:04Have a nice weekend!" Well, wait a minute. I mean, that just makes it WORSE. Like, don't

9:10just tell me I'm going to fail. Like, “WHY? How? What did I miss? I thought I was doing good. Like,

9:14what happened? And can I get back on track? Can I still do something? Can I salvage my grade?”

9:20But basically, HELP me. Don't just say, "Yeah, I called you in here because you're screwed. You're

9:25gonna fail. Take care." No, that just makes it worse. So, offer the ideas to actually improve,

9:32to actually change things. That's the biggie. And consider if and how that could – oh, by the way,

9:39this says “when appropriate.” And you might think, “Okay, well, when would it NOT be appropriate?”

9:44Well, if it's an issue where you're not comfortable or there's a huge risk in doing so and

9:49offering how they should change or how they could fix it or if it's something they can't control,

9:54there is nothing worse as far as making people feel attacked and getting them annoyed or angry

10:00if they feel like they're being criticized for something beyond their control. If they

10:06can't control it, how are they supposed to fix it? It'd be like if you planned an event with

10:11friends and it was outside and it rained that day and your friends said, "Well, you can't

10:16plan anything." Well, that's harsh. You can't control the weather. That's not YOUR fault. So,

10:21again, you wouldn't like that because that was out of your control. Now, the last:

10:26Consider if and how that constructor criticism might affect your relationship. Could it affect

10:32your relationship? Kind of goes back to how might the person respond. Could there be issues with

10:38that? Could there be risks involved with that? And if so, is it WORTH it? Are you willing or

10:44able to accept those risks? Different types of behavior in relationships. Three main types. And

10:50these all encourage or reflect how people deal with conflict. One, passive behavior. People

10:58who are passive give in to others and let them have their way. “You win. We'll do it your way.”

11:04So, the idea is if it's done too often or too extremely, “You're important, I'm NOT as

11:09important.” Now you might think, “Okay, if people are selfless like that -- selfless and thinking of

11:16others – ‘I'm going to let you have your way.’ I'm going to show consideration,’ they should get that

11:20in return. It should be fair.” The problem is we probably know that's often not true. Instead, they

11:27get taken advantage of. They get walked on, walked all over, as the saying goes. And that can cause

11:33passive aggressive behavior in them eventually. Resentment, just personal unhappiness as far as

11:39“Everybody else gets their way and it seems like all my friends are happy except me and half the

11:44time, it's at MY expense. I deserve…what about ME, right? Am I chopped liver?” So that could

11:50certainly be an issue. Why are people passive? Well, they're passive because they fear the cost,

11:57perhaps, or they're insecure in that relationship. If I assert myself and say what I want or how I'm

12:02feeling, they might think less of me. They might be disappointed. It might make them unhappy. Or,

12:08in the worst-case scenarios, they might lash out or hurt me. And that's a serious situation.

12:13Obviously, if it's an abusive or dysfunctional relationship, that fear can be real because the

12:19last time I voiced my concerns or stood up for myself, I got hurt. Yeah, I'm going to think twice

12:25about doing so again. That's a horrible spot to be in. They have low self-esteem. If you don't think

12:32you're worth asserting yourself and saying what you want or how you feel, you're less inclined to

12:37do so. If you're less inclined to do so and you're passive as a result, people might take advantage

12:43of you. If they take advantage of you, that keeps self-esteem low in the first place. We get a cycle

12:49of negativity, in that sense. So, that one is severe as well, or can be. They value the other

12:56person above themselves. And I see this sometimes where people have the idea, “Oh, I should thank

13:01my lucky stars they chose some loser like me because they're all this, they're all that,

13:05and I'm just nothing compared to them. I'm just dirt beneath…” That kind of thinking or attitude

13:11really encourages dysfunctionality because after a while, if the other person knows that's how the

13:16person feels, that power might go to their head. If you put somebody on a pedestal and treat them

13:22like a god, you might not like how they respond to that, to their new position above you. So,

13:29frankly, you could argue that kind of thinking at the extreme – “they're wonderful. I'm crap. Oh,

13:34I'm so…you know, they're all that. I'm just nothing” -- is really pathetic. It's not true.

13:39You BOTH have value. That's why you're together. You're not a loser. Neither are they. They're

13:44cool. So are you. So are you. So, watch out for doing that. That can cause severe issues. On the

13:51other hand, we just trashed the passive style. Is it ever okay to give in to others and be passive?

13:56Sure. It's OFTEN okay. It's okay when we don't really care as far as it's not that big of a deal.

14:03Let's say, for example, there's a couple and they were going to go to Taco Bell and they talked

14:08about that last week. Every week they go somewhere and next week, “Oh, Taco Bell, they got that new

14:13item, the toasted cheddar cheese dipping chalupa, whatever you want to call it. I I'm excited about

14:19this.” So, next week, we're going to Taco Bell. So, next week rolls around and the other one says,

14:23"Oh, there's a new restaurant opened up. They're having a special tonight. Do you care if we go

14:28there? You know, just for tonight because it's a brand-new place?” Okay. Now, is that a big deal?

14:33Probably not. Am I gonna say, “You said last week we could have Taco Bell. You LIE.” No,

14:41that's…it's not that big of a deal. Most likely I'll, you know, pick it up later. We'll go here

14:46now. We'll go to Taco Bell later. Taco Bell is not going to close. So, it's not that big of a

14:51deal. And that's the idea. It's okay to give in when it's OKAY TO GIVE IN, when we're okay with

14:57doing so. We don't mind because it's not that big of a deal. Maybe it's annoying or inconvenient,

15:02but it's going to help them out. Help them be happy or feel good helping somebody move. Nobody

15:07wants to help a friend move. Nobody likes moving. But if my friend needs me and I'm there -- I can

15:13be there. I got the time -- Yeah, I'll help. They're my friend. So, we have the right to

15:19basically fall on each other and ask each other for help in those situations. Same with lovers,

15:24romantic people. You name it. It's okay to give in when it's okay because that's for them. It's

15:29worth it or I don't mind. It's real small. Who cares? Then it's okay. Aggressive behavior.

15:35This is the opposite. Aggressive people are basically “My way or the highway. I WILL get

15:39my way. If you don't like it, tough.” Well, the issue there, of course, is it pushes people away.

15:45It encourages loneliness. It's an off-putting style and it takes advantage of others. So,

15:51it doesn't encourage good relationships. Why are people aggressive? They perceive themselves as

15:56powerful. They think they're all that. They act that way. They get their way until they

16:00push people away. But in the meantime, it must be working. I'll keep at it. They don't value

16:05the other person. That speaks for itself. Or they justify, "Yeah, I know you're upset, but trust me,

16:12I know what's best for both of us. If I get my way, we'll both win. I let you have your way,

16:18you'll mess things up. Your idea is going to hurt us both. I know what's best for both of us." And

16:23that's typically a bunch of crap. But that's the idea. At the core, they're not putting as much

16:28value on the other person as they are themselves. And some people make no bones about that. They

16:35lack emotional control. Speaks for itself. People assume, “It's my emotions, I can control them.

16:41Their mine, I can control them.” Well, you sure? And now, do you know issues before? Have you had

16:47those issues where you lost control, lost your temper, lost a job, lost previous relationships

16:53because you couldn't control your emotions? So, that's a big deal. So, challenge yourself in that

16:59sense, if you think that might be the case. And if so, seek help in that regard. Help's

17:03available. It certainly is, and people say, "Oh, emotional help. That's uh, going down THAT path…”

17:11That's just ridiculous. I've never understood that. You break your leg, you go get your leg

17:16fixed. If it's your emotions that are broken or you can't control them, why would you not want

17:21to get THAT fixed? What, that's not as important as your leg? Come on. So, it's ALL important. I

17:29think that's worth pointing out. Really do. Now, since we trashed the aggressive style,

17:33when is it the best style to use? It's the best style when it's the ONLY one left. When the others

17:39can't or will not work. So, in cases where it's an emergency, life or death, your personal safety,

17:45you're at risk if you don't defend yourself, and the only way is to be aggressive…sure.

17:52Pushing somebody down the stairs. Oh, that's a…you shouldn't do that. That's a terrible thing to do.

17:58Well, unless the person you pushed was charging at you with a knife. Yeah, push them, kick them,

18:04right? Take care of them. Get them down those stairs. And hopefully when they hit the bottom,

18:08they're knocked out. Otherwise, they're still a threat because, again, they were waving a knife

18:12at you. So, that's an extreme example, but you get the idea. The aggressive style is the best style

18:18when it's the only style left we can feasibly use in that situation. But sometimes people jump right

18:25to aggressive when, nah, there were other ways you could have handled that. Didn't have to be

18:30aggressive. You say, “Well, I had no choice. I loved that movie. My so-called friend said

18:36it was crap, so I punched him.” What? No, you got some anger issues there. Assertive behavior. So,

18:44if passive says “You're important and I'm not,” and aggressive says “I'm important, you're not,”

18:51assertive is cool. It says, “Don’t hurt others and don't let them hurt you.” You're cool. I'm cool.

18:58Don't mess with me. I won't mess with you. I love this style, this balanced approach. To practice

19:04this one, in conflict, identify what you're thinking or feeling. What's going on? What is up?

19:11Specifically identify what that actually is. And that's key to be specific because sometimes…Ever

19:19have a case where you sense, let's say you're with somebody and you get the idea they're mad at you

19:24or they're not too happy with you, but you don't know why. So, you ask them, "Why are you mad?"

19:30They look at you, then they get even madder. They say, "You don't know?" You're like, "No,

19:35that's why I'm asking. What? What's going on?” “You seriously don't know?" Now they're right

19:40getting hotter. “No, I can't believe…if you're that stupid, I'm not going to tell you.” Okay.

19:47Well, they're going to stay ignorant and you're going to stay POd and neither one is good. So, you

19:54might think, "Ah, they should know and I shouldn't have to tell them,” but if they don't know, they

19:58don't know. TELL THEM. Goodness, gracious. Get on with it. Number two, analyze the cause of those

20:03feelings. What's causing this? And be honest. Is it all on them? Is it ALL them? Or is it partly

20:09YOU? Are you contributing? Are you responsible, at least partially? Could it be issues like work,

20:15life, family, friends, job, career, school, things like that? Moving, right? Florida? I don't know…

20:21anything like that. What could factor in? Identify the rights, wants, and expectations you have,

20:28what those are. What do you want here to resolve this conflict? And is that itself reasonable?

20:34Or are you expecting too much, being unfair, being selfish, or are you wrong to want or to

20:40expect that because it is asking too much or it's unreasonable? Again, honesty, that's crucial. This

20:46will NOT work if we're not honest with ourselves and our relationship. Focus on the issue or source

20:52of conflict and explain or defend your position politely but firmly. That is assertive behavior.

20:58If you drop eye contact and say, "Well, I I kind of, sort of – now, I might be wrong -- I

21:02might be wrong, but I kind of…” That’s too weak, too passive. If you glare and stare and “I'll

21:08TELL you what we're going to,” you know, that’s too aggressive. So, firmly but politely explain

21:14your position or defend yourself. That's the idea. That's the approach with the assertive style. Now,

21:20variations in these styles based on culture. We will skip Western culture for now. For Latin and

21:27Hispanic culture, Latin and Hispanic culture, they tend to use a more aggressive approach in

21:33resolving or dealing with conflict because of the term “machismo.” Machismo in America translates

21:39as “macho.” And if somebody is macho, you don't mess with them. So, the idea is Latin and Hispanic

21:45culture, because they're very much group- and family-based, they value honor tremendously. So,

21:52if somebody messes with you or says something or does something to defile your honor,

21:57you don't take that. You let them know. You put them in their place and basically,

22:02you get back at them, they had it coming. So, the machismo style there encourages a more aggressive

22:07approach overall. I had a student one time -- and he was joking -- but he said, "Yeah, when we go

22:13to buy a car or negotiate or do something where there's haggling involved or dealmaking, I always

22:18bring my girlfriend." And I said, "Oh, okay. Why is that?” And he smiled and he said, "Well,

22:25um, she's Hispanic, and she really…she'll let him have it. She'll just go to town and, ‘No, we're

22:30not taking 12 grand for that. No more than 10. You know, 10, five, five is not 10.’ And it's like she

22:36gets into that. She kind of likes it.” He's like, “I just step back and let her go to war.” So,

22:40I thought that was kind of interesting. Kind of made me chuckle. All right. Then, Asian culture,

22:45it's seen as more passive overall in dealing with conflict. More passive overall with the

22:51idea being in American culture, America has an old saying, “The squeaky wheel gets the grease.”

22:57The squeaky wheel gets the grease. Who are the squeaky wheels? The people that complain, the

23:02people that voice their concerns, the customers at Starbucks or wherever you might work, who maybe

23:09you've seen them grumble and complain, “I want to see the manager!” Basically, I hate to say it,

23:16but the Karens out there, the Karens get the grease, they complain to get it. Asian culture has

23:24a different saying. Their saying is “The nail that sticks out shall be hammered down.” Think about

23:30that for a sec: The nail that sticks out shall be hammered down. So, their view is if you complain

23:37and squawk and squeak too much, come on. That's not fair. It's undignified. You're making a scene,

23:45making a spectacle of yourself, and you might get put in your place. And maybe that's what

23:51you deserved. So, they value dignity. Dealing with things internally on one's own, not making a fuss,

23:57not making a scene, just quietly dealing with things or sometimes basically putting up with

24:02it. It was a cup of coffee. Who cares that the whipped cream was misshapen? Goodness.

24:08Sit down. Right? Sit your…all right. So, it's a different view there with the Asian culture

24:14that encourages more passive approaches. Western culture, America -- America in particular -- is

24:20seen as aggressive or assertive, either one. I'd say assertive/aggressive depending on who's in

24:26charge at the time, what's going on, but we're not seen as a passive nation overall. Not typically.

24:32We're usually seen as assertive or aggressive or a combination of those two overall. So, we'll have

24:38negotiations and discussion with many nations. But the idea is if we don't like something, we might

24:44ratchet up the pressure, sanctions, restrictions, embargos, use of force, perhaps. And we could

24:50argue that's not always bad. If we're using force against a really horrible regime and it helps save

24:56the people, right? You've heard this before. So again, not always bad. It's just a difference,

25:03right? A difference in viewpoints overall. But the big thing is I don't think America is seen as

25:09passive overall in most situations. One of the two there between assertive or aggressive, or a mix of

25:16both. Conflict in relationships. All right. So the main thing is how do we resolve conflict? We

25:24talked about it. We talked about if we can resolve it, that can be a blessing for both people. Well,

25:29how do people resolve conflict? What are some methods for doing so? Let's close out with that.

25:34One style is the avoiding style. This is withdrawal. If I withdraw from the conflict,

25:40I avoid it. Which basically means, “You win. We don't have a conflict.” Actually, I shouldn't say

25:47“You win.” That's different. Avoiding is exactly what it says. “I'm going to walk away from the

25:52conflict. Withdraw from it. Avoid it. Basically, I am NOT having this conversation. We're not having

25:57this discussion. I'M not, anyway. I'm out of here.” And I walk away. That's avoiding. Now, the

26:03issue is it's not going to resolve the conflict unless it goes away on its own, but typically that

26:08doesn't work that way. It might make it worse if the other person wants to resolve it and I'm the

26:13one walking away and they're saying behind me, "Oh, yeah, figures. Yeah, just keep walking.

26:17Just walk away. Just be a coward. You never want to resolve things, never want to work on things. I

26:22guess I'm not worth it. We're not worth it. Yeah. Keep walking.” All that, right? You’re going to

26:27make it worse then, in that sense, because it might show to the other person you don't care

26:31enough about them to want to resolve it. When's it best to use the avoiding style, to walk away

26:37and withdraw? When you HAVE to. If tempers are about to flare, either one is about to say or do

26:44something regretful, emotions are running high. It's best to get away, calm down, cool off, sort

26:50through things, gather your thoughts, and come back later with a better, fresher perspective.

26:55But you DO want to come back at some point, unless you can't -- unless it's a safety thing, then,

27:00of course, but otherwise, do continue the conflict at a later date. Accommodating. This reflects the

27:07passive behavior. This is when I say, “Okay you win. We'll do it your way. All right.” So,

27:13there's no conflict maybe, but maybe there IS because I just gave in because, you know, I

27:20wasn't going to win or I felt like I couldn't this time. But I'm still upset and I shouldn't have had

27:25to have given in, and I'm going to get back at you at some point. I'll make you…So, you see where I'm

27:31going with this? Passive aggressive. This could encourage passive aggressive (behavior). So, don't

27:36accommodate is the idea. Don't accommodate unless you're comfortable doing so. Don't give in unless

27:41you feel like it's worth it. You can, you should, it's no big deal. Things like that. Forcing. This

27:46reflects aggressive behavior. Has the same pros and cons as aggressive behavior, which we just

27:52covered. Compromising. So, this one reflects accommodating and assertive behavior. It's often

28:00seen as the golden method. If people compromise, all right. Well, what is it? If they compromise,

28:05both people lose or give up something to resolve the conflict. Neither gets exactly what they want,

28:11but they both get something closer than what they could have had. So, we both got what we wanted,

28:16kind of, and as long as it's equal, neither one outgained the other. So, an example years ago,

28:24one of my students said, you know, they're living in an apartment complex with their girlfriend,

28:29I believe, girlfriend, boyfriend, and the student said, “I like I like my place around, we'll say

28:3470, we'll say 72. And the person I'm with, they're cold and they want it, they want it somewhere,

28:43we'll say we'll say 78 in that sense.” Okay. We'll say 76. All right. So 72, right? They're too cool.

28:5476, they're too hot. If they compromise, the thermostat goes to 74. That is compromise by the

29:01numbers, literally, where they both gave up two degrees. So neither got exactly what they wanted,

29:07but they both got something closer than what they could have had. Compromise is often seen as the

29:13best technique, but it's really not. Collaboration is the best technique overall, but in some cases,

29:20it's tough to collaborate, maybe even impossible, or it might seem that way. At its core,

29:26with compromise, you've got two people who lost. Two equal losers. Not losers as people, but they

29:33both lost. They just lost EQUALLY. So, okay, it was even, but they were still losing, that was

29:39involved with that. Whereas collaboration, this is assertive behavior. With this one,

29:45we can both WIN. Neither one has to lose. We don't have to compromise. And if you're thinking, “Oh,

29:51well, how's that work? And what's the difference between that and compromising?” Let's use a movie

29:56as an example. Let's say you got a couple and every Friday is movie night. They pick their movie

30:01ahead of time and they go see it. And this week they're having trouble picking one. And one says,

30:05"I want to see movie A. That sounds good." The other says, "I want to see movie B. That sounds

30:12really good." And the other one says, "Oh, I don't want to really see B." And they say,

30:16"Well, I don't really want to see A." Okay, so there's a conflict as far as what movie to see.

30:21If they compromise, they might say, "Okay, well, how about we see movie A this week and we'll see

30:28movie B next week." That's compromise. They both got what they wanted -- with some strings

30:35attached, right? They both have to see the movie they also DON’T want to see. So, a little bit of

30:42strings attached, right? There's some losing involved. What if they collaborate? Is there a

30:47way they could both WIN and resolve this? Ideally, one of my students one time said they could break

30:53up. Jimminy Christmas. This is a person who takes their movies seriously. No, they don't want to

30:58break up. What else could we do? One of them said, "Well, you can see the movie, uh, they could go to

31:06the first one in the afternoon and see the second one later,” but they're still seeing the movie

31:10they don't want to see. And one of my students said, "Well, now, wait a minute. It's a theater,

31:14right?" I said, "Yeah, there's more than one movie. Oh, yeah, there's 14. It's a big megaplex.”

31:20“Okay. Well, couldn't they just both see a different movie that they both like?” Bingo.

31:27THAT’S collaboration. So, in that case, we'll just pick something else that we both want to

31:32see. That way, we're BOTH happy and neither one of us has to lose. Collaboration and

31:37compromise are similar as far as it takes two willing people, especially for collaboration.

31:42Collaboration usually takes more brainstorming, more thought, more critical thinking. At its core,

31:48if we pull it off, it is better, and the best style of all because it involves both

31:53people winning. Neither one has to lose or give up something. So, that's the best approach overall.

31:59And that's the end of the section. Appreciate your time, like always. I'll come back with

32:03the next VA soon. Looking forward to seeing you again. Until then, you take care. Have a good one.

32:10[Manually reviewed and captioned May 2026]

More from Tony Smith

Recently added transcripts

Browse the whole transcript library Browse all English transcripts

This transcript was generated from the captions YouTube publishes for this video. Get the transcript of any YouTube video atfreeyoutubetranscribe.com, free, unlimited, no sign-up.