Full transcript
0:00There we go, boys. Welcome back to
0:02another episode of the Bootcamp. If you
0:04are new here, I'm literally teaching my
0:06entire trading model completely for
0:08free. It is a model that is unlike
0:10anything that you probably seen or used
0:12in this space before. It's highly
0:13mechanical. It is the MAC model, and
0:15today we are learning one of well, I say
0:17learning, we're really talking about the
0:20um foundational piece of the model,
0:22which is what we call the pointer or
0:23what is actually how we take our entry.
0:26Now, I want to make it very very very
0:27very clear. Today, we are not learning
0:30the high defined details behind every
0:32single setup that could ever exist
0:34forever and always. By the way, wasn't
0:36even supposed to make a video today. I
0:38was out till 4:00 a.m. You're welcome. I
0:41got back. I said, "You know what? I got
0:43a little bit of energy, a little bit of
0:44pep in my step.
0:47Let's teach them about pointers as if I
0:48haven't already a [ __ ] trillion
0:50times. We're doing it again. The last
0:53video I'm ever going to I've said this
0:54before.
0:55The last video I'm going to make
0:56[clears throat]
0:58isn't going to be this one, actually,
0:59because I plan on making a whole series
1:01of videos on the pointer. Today is
1:03episode one of episode six of the
1:06Bootcamp, episode one of pointers.
1:07Today, we're learning about what a
1:08pointer is, the problem that it solves,
1:10how to identify it, um exactly why it
1:13works, and how we're going to be using
1:14it, and
1:16all the important stuff you need to know
1:17about what a pointer is or how we enter
1:20our trades. Understand?
1:22A pointer, this is a big problem, and
1:25this is one of the foundational reasons
1:26why I'm releasing the Bootcamp early. I
1:28was supposed to release it at 100k. By
1:30the way, you [ __ ] you little
1:32[ __ ]
1:33I'm at 81.1k on Instagram. Get my ass to
1:36100k. Get my ass to 100k. What are we
1:39doing? Okay? The [ __ ] are we doing?
1:41Share it to your friends. Share it to
1:43your family. Share it to your [ __ ]
1:44dog. Get me to 100k. But, I released the
1:47Bootcamp, making the Bootcamp before I
1:49hit 100k because one of the biggest
1:50reasons is there's so much
1:52misinformation. I don't even know where
1:54it came from. It's just people It's
1:56really because, you know, if you don't
1:58watch my streams, if you weren't
2:00watching it daily, you weren't actively
2:02putting an effort in, and you just
2:03relied on a YouTube video, and watched
2:04one video, and then thought you were
2:05going to learn the model from one video,
2:07you probably got absolutely back-shotted
2:09on, and so you don't know everything.
2:12And that's totally fine. This is a model
2:13that isn't like solvable in one YouTube
2:15video. You know, a lot of people ask me
2:17like, "What's the one video, bro, where
2:18I can learn it all like easily?" It's
2:20like, "None of them." You got It's like
2:22a model you have to learn and develop
2:23and backtest. Um but yeah, so
2:26>> [clears throat]
2:26>> the next episode I do drop in the
2:28bootcamps actually going to be a psych
2:29video. So, we're going to have
2:31pointer intro, psych video, and then
2:32pointer episode two. There's going to be
2:34a lot of episodes attached to this.
2:36Um remember, we're still in the
2:38conceptual part of the bootcamp. We're
2:39still learning concepts. We're still
2:41learning features.
2:42We're not learning how to actually
2:43execute and apply discretion and do the
2:46model. We're just learning the pieces of
2:47the little [ __ ] okay? Just preface.
2:50But, that being said, um
2:53a pointer is a reaction to an FFE G.
2:57Uh the history of the pointer is very
2:59simple. Basically, when I first started
3:01trading, I noticed that price would
3:03transition between certain FFE Gs very
3:06cleanly, very
3:08uh
3:09very predictably. Uh and I I just didn't
3:11know how to take advantage of that,
3:12right? And so, I would basically go in
3:14and I'd find implied moves. If you don't
3:16remember, go watch episode one and two.
3:18We talked about identifying implied
3:19moves and opportunities and lack of
3:21opportunities. And I'd go in here and
3:22I'd find implied moves.
3:24And I started to notice something. I
3:25started to notice that every single
3:26implied move had this one feature, every
3:29single time. And I backtested this up to
3:31like 2021, and I'm like, "Holy [ __ ]
3:33This is kind of crazy."
3:35The reason why I had gone down this
3:36explorative route of finding this
3:38concept is because one of the biggest
3:40issues with my trading is I would enter
3:41like most of you guys on a break in
3:43structure.
3:44Um and there's a fundamental problem
3:47with entering on a break in structure.
3:48And you might not realize it.
3:50When you're right,
3:52we're right. But, you're wrong, there's
3:54no entry for the MAC model. What do I
3:55mean by this? Well, what is the problem
3:57with a broken structure?
3:59What is the market trying to be? It's
4:01trying to be efficient, right? So, if
4:02you're right and you are trading
4:04alongside people trading MAC, then the
4:06market is inefficient and the broken
4:08structure will not be retraced. But,
4:10what are you going to do in a situation
4:11where you're testing for an
4:12accumulation? We don't know if the
4:14market's going to accumulate, but we
4:15Let's just say we know in the future
4:16that the market's going to accumulate.
4:18Let's say in this little universe, we
4:19know that the market's going to
4:20accumulate. Well, what is a broken
4:22structure? A broken structure is
4:23basically an invitation to create an
4:26inefficiency. Why? Well, what's a fair
4:28value gap? Well, a fair value gap, if
4:30you remember from that lesson I had, I
4:31think it was episode 3. Um if a fair If
4:34you look at a fair value gap, the first
4:35type of a fair value gap is what I like
4:36to call an inefficient broken structure,
4:39just a broken structure. Where basically
4:41you have a candle close over a candle
4:43high, right? So, like here's the candle
4:45close over the candle high, wick close
4:47over or close over wick, basically
4:49leaving behind the potential to close an
4:51inefficiency. At this particular candle
4:54here, we don't know if the inefficiency
4:55is going to be locked in, right? If you
4:56look at how the candles were placed, we
4:58know that if a fair value gap is going
5:00to form, it's going to form in between
5:01this wick and wherever this wick lands.
5:03If the price pulls back in here right
5:05before the inefficiency gets created,
5:06then it's not going to be created. What
5:08would cause that?
5:10Proportional amount of liquidity in the
5:12market. If we have available sellers at
5:15this high, when the market comes in and
5:17retraces this high, it's going to use
5:19the orders to fill that is high to get
5:22and retrace out the inefficiency before
5:24it even closes. Remember, the market is
5:26trying to be efficient. The market is
5:28trying to allow for equal and fair
5:30bidding and asking between all buyers
5:32and sellers in the market. So, I was
5:34thinking like, well,
5:35every time I enter in a broken
5:36structure, sometimes it works.
5:39Sometimes it works, but it seems like a
5:41lot of my broken structure uh type of
5:43validation trades I was taking in the
5:45past seemingly would have violent
5:47retraces. And it makes sense because if
5:50you have the potential to create an
5:52inefficiency by breaking structure over
5:55a high or over a low, you are
5:57potentially about to form and close an
6:00inefficiency. And so, if the market
6:01naturally wants to be efficient, then
6:04it's going to use the liquidity at the
6:05first available high or the FFEG or at
6:08the first available low or the FFEG to
6:11fill and close out the inefficiency
6:13before it even has the chance to form.
6:16Which means that a lot of breaking
6:18structures are going to be invalidated.
6:20Now, again, there's breaking structures
6:22are not the core principle in what I was
6:24taking entries on, but it was part of
6:27the process of figuring out how to take
6:28validations of FFEGs. Whether you like
6:30it or not, whether you like me or not,
6:32the market is reacting to FFEGs. It is
6:35the most precise type of
6:37uh it's the most precise type of
6:38confluence that you can use to represent
6:41supply or demand because it just
6:42represents every single interaction that
6:44could ever happen in supply or demand.
6:46And I I there's just no way around that
6:48at all. Everything is FFEGs.
6:50Um you can't go back after you use them.
6:52You just can't. You just can't. But
6:55>> [clears throat and cough]
6:56>> what I noticed is that if we look for
6:59inefficient breaking structures during a
7:01consolidation, often times they are
7:04immediately retraced on. So, essentially
7:05what we need to look for, this is a
7:07relative chop. We can look in this like
7:08choppy range of price, is biases that
7:11failed, maybe even were successful, but
7:13biases that failed that started with a
7:15breaking structure, right? We're looking
7:16for an inefficiency that essentially
7:19gets closed off, right? So, take a look
7:20here. We have um a couple of things
7:22going on. Now, obviously,
7:24I'm cherry-picking to explain this idea,
7:26but you have to understand that I was
7:27struggling as a trader
7:29uh as I was,
7:30you know, learning from other people or
7:31learning from online sources. You have
7:33to understand my model is created by me
7:34because I failed to find something that
7:37worked. Uh everything that I All the
7:39people that you probably learned from, I
7:40studied all their [ __ ] and like like,
7:41literally just trash. This is like
7:43absolute garbage. Like, okay, it's just
7:45terrible. So, I was like, let me just
7:46build this [ __ ] myself.
7:47Um
7:49So, we're going to approach this and
7:50just explain what the market's doing. We
7:52know in hindsight the market didn't go
7:54anywhere. From this end point to this
7:55end point, the market did not go
7:56anywhere. We consolidated in this range
7:58of price. Did we have small inter-
8:01intermittent, you know, leans and like
8:02like draws in liquidity? Sure. But,
8:04generally speaking, the market did not
8:06go anywhere of any real value, right?
8:08So, ultimately, we didn't There was not
8:10much to be said for this range. Um
8:13but, if we're going to look in the price
8:14here,
8:15I want you to look for potential uh fair
8:18value gaps that could have formed, okay?
8:20And we want to look for closures that
8:22essentially mitigate those
8:23inefficiencies from developing. What do
8:25we see here?
8:27Well, we see a buy-side manipulation, a
8:28close over the wick, close over these
8:31wicks, which means that if price closed
8:33anywhere beneath this wick on this third
8:34candle, we would close an inefficiency
8:36in here. But, take a look, what happens
8:38when price closes this break in
8:39structure, right? When price closes this
8:42break in structure, we're manipulating
8:43into new lows. What do we learn about in
8:45our liquidity lesson? Well, we learn
8:46that if we have available orders at the
8:48low, sell-side sweep should move higher
8:50if there are orders if there are orders
8:52at the low, we should move higher, and
8:54that's exactly what happens in a
8:55proportional market. We have a potential
8:57inefficiency that could close in here.
8:59You see how if the market were to close
9:00up, you know, uh if we let's say
9:03if it opens here, assuming no volume
9:05imbalance, we open here, and maybe the
9:07wicks come all the way up here as long
9:08as it doesn't come up to this, it could
9:09close out the inefficiency. Well, why
9:11would the market close out this this
9:12inefficient break? It's because we have
9:14an an immediately available amount of
9:16orders at this low. So, one thing to
9:18look for, and this is kind of getting
9:19ahead of myself here, when we talk about
9:21PO3, and you might not even know what
9:22this means, but accumulation ranges and
9:24how to trade them, how to predict them,
9:25how to not trade them, what to do during
9:27them, limit orders, like I'm teaching
9:28you everything. But, you'll notice that
9:31inefficient breaking structures, as long
9:33as well as weak pointers, again, we'll
9:34get that later on, are Nina, you are
9:36biting my [ __ ] toe right now. I will
9:39I will piledrive you. I will flip you on
9:41your back. Good girl.
9:43Um
9:44inefficient breaking structures along
9:45with weak pointers are the
9:52are
9:54they're the most common during an
9:56accumulation because we have
9:58proportional orders at the low available
10:00orders at the first available low to
10:02pull back off of.
10:07No more toy.
10:10Okay, that was kind of mean. I'm sorry.
10:12>> [laughter]
10:12>> Anyways, there's no We have available
10:14orders at the low, so we're going to
10:15immediately pull back on that. And what
10:16do we see?
10:17We see [ __ ] nothing and TradingView
10:19is absolute dog [ __ ] Oh, she got a
10:21different toy. [ __ ] dog. Okay.
10:24Excuse me?
10:28Are we just not going to can load the
10:29deck?
10:31Okay, we're going to run this back.
10:34I don't even know where I was. It's
10:35somewhere in here, right?
10:37Uh
10:38where the [ __ ] was that [ __ ]
10:41Oh, bro, come on.
10:43Where was I, bro?
10:45I mean, I can do this in any
10:46consolidation. It's not that deep.
10:48Okay, right here, I think.
10:49This little [ __ ] dog.
10:51Right here. Okay, there's an inefficient
10:53break.
10:54And then what do we see happen? Price
10:56comes in and cl-
10:58I want to reset my TradingView before I
10:59crash the
11:00All right.
11:02Problem solved. So,
11:04in a proportional market in this that
11:07we're seeing, we have this inefficient
11:08breaking structure. If there are orders
11:09at the low, we will see a pullback. And
11:11what do we see? An immediate pullback
11:13and correction of this inefficiency. I
11:15want you to notice during the chop how
11:16many inefficient breaking structures get
11:18immediately retraced on. Inefficient
11:19break doesn't get a retrace.
11:21Uh yeah, the fair value gap did not
11:23close in this instance. Not necessarily
11:25retrace, but it didn't close. Um okay,
11:27inefficient break doesn't get a retrace.
11:29Uh in this case, it did get a retrace,
11:31and didn't go anywhere.
11:33>> [clears throat]
11:36>> Inefficient break does get a retrace?
11:38Yes, violent retrace.
11:40Inefficient break [snorts] does get a
11:41retrace? Yes, doesn't really go
11:43anywhere, though.
11:44Doesn't really go anywhere.
11:46>> [snorts]
11:47>> Inefficient break does get a retrace?
11:49No. There's a reason why it's not
11:50getting a retrace, and you might know it
11:52if you know about pointers already.
11:54>> [clears throat and cough]
11:55>> Inefficient break does get a retrace?
11:58Yes, immediately. So, that's the problem
12:00that I started to notice, right? Taking
12:02these validations of FFEGs, cuz right
12:04right then and there we noticed that
12:06we're validating this FFEG. So, the
12:08theory is, right, what we're trying to
12:09do with the MAC model is figure out
12:10which FFEGs we can take transitions
12:13from, right? And if we're looking at,
12:15you know, just volatility coming from
12:17the FFEG, you would agree that there is
12:18volatility coming from this FFEG set on
12:20this sweep this manipulation event,
12:22right? But, the problem is
12:25the actual order flow never really
12:27supports until we get what's called a
12:30efficient validation, which, believe it
12:32or not, and now we have MACRO here,
12:33believe it or not, um, is something that
12:37I had to convince myself of to be true,
12:40and it seemed too easy at the time to be
12:42true. When I first invented pointers,
12:44and when I first started, you know,
12:45using them, I had to create a bunch of
12:47rules that I had to convince myself were
12:49real, and then I went through and proved
12:51them all using back testing and using
12:53live markets, and literally almost 4
12:55years of back tested data, including 2
12:57years of live traded data, um, every
13:00single day it's tested, and it's held to
13:02be true. Some of the rules that we have
13:04for pointers, um, are
13:07at first,
13:08I didn't know them. I had to kind of
13:09create them and assume them to be true.
13:11And then as I back tested, I realized,
13:12holy [ __ ]
13:13this is just a feature in the market
13:15that is always there forever and always.
13:17So, this video is mainly useful for
13:20proving pointers. What I want to do is I
13:22want to prove pointers. I want to prove
13:23that they exist. I want to prove how
13:24they work, and how we can identify them.
13:26So, what we notice is even though we're
13:28validating that FFE G by moving away
13:30from it, if you would enter longs in the
13:31validation on the break in structure of
13:33the FFE G, you would have gotten cooked
13:35here. And there was no mechanical way of
13:36holding this trade down, right? There's
13:38no way of getting in on the trade. Nina,
13:40can we not [ __ ] There's nothing in
13:42your bowl. Just lay the [ __ ] down. Okay?
13:45We are moving away from the the
13:47inefficiency, but we're not doing so in
13:49a way that's going to confirm that the
13:51total flow change is going to create a
13:53rate of change. If you remember from
13:54episode one, I said we needed a total
13:55flow change, which is going to be a
13:57manipulation or continuation of an FFE G
13:59validation event, and it's going to
14:01sponsor the rate of change being a
14:02pointer. And that's going to kind of
14:04seal the deal for the direction of
14:06price.
14:07Um that's the goal, right? The pointer
14:09was my solution for the problem being
14:11that inefficient break in structures
14:13essentially get and invite a
14:15retracement. When you invite the
14:16retracement, you're almost immediately
14:18asking for the next set of candles to
14:20potentially retrace you. Even if you
14:21have a strong draw on liquidity, even if
14:22you have a good bias outside of the MACD
14:24model already, you a lot of inefficient
14:26breaks are just suboptimal ways to get
14:28in the trade.
14:29What a pointer does and what it solves
14:31is getting It's like opening the door,
14:34getting in the trade before everybody
14:37else does, or in a way that's still
14:39discounted, but discounted in a way
14:41that's not going to invite the
14:42retracement automatically. It's a way to
14:44get in that isn't already overpriced as
14:47it is. So, if you're trying to get in
14:48longs, you're not getting placed higher
14:49than you should be.
14:51Um and it's a way to feel out a
14:53accumulation range. The pointer solves
14:55the crisis that I was facing, which was
14:57that I had the right idea, I had the
14:58right bias, I had a good draw on
14:59liquidity, but my entry would often get
15:02retraced. That's what the pointer
15:03solves. And then I come came to find out
15:05that the pointer is actually part of
15:06every single implied move. So, today
15:08you're going to be learning rule number
15:09one of my like 13 or 14 rules of
15:12pointers. Rule number one is this, very
15:14simple. Every implied move Technically,
15:17rule one and rule number two. Every
15:18implied move has a pointer reacting to
15:22an FFE G unless it's macro or news
15:24based. Every single pointer
15:27uh every single implied move has a
15:28pointer reacting to an FFE G somewhere
15:31in the system. Somewhere in any swing
15:33move, there will be a pointer reacting
15:34to an FFE G. The trick is applying
15:36discretion, knowing when not to trade
15:38it, and knowing how to trade it, right?
15:40There's going to be a lot of ways to
15:41trade it. Um but knowing this
15:43information is kind of tough. You have
15:44to understand put yourself in my point
15:45of view. Okay, no one taught me this. No
15:47one showed me this. I built this, okay?
15:50Um when I first discovered MAC, this is
15:51one of the first rules I had to convince
15:53myself of. I was like, "Okay, these are
15:54really, really weird." Once I stopped
15:56looking at taking breaks in structure, I
15:58was like, "Okay, well, how what what
16:00does a pointer look like? What is an
16:02inefficient break?" Close over a wick.
16:04So,
16:05shouldn't I look for an entry that
16:07doesn't close over a wick?
16:08And you might say yes, but then how are
16:10we validating moving away from something
16:12and breaking structure if we never break
16:14over a wick? Well, it doesn't have to be
16:16a breaking structure.
16:17All that we're trying to prove is that
16:18an FFE G has volume. Well, how do we
16:20prove an FFE G has volume? If we move
16:22away from it, if we validate it, right?
16:24Sell side move higher, buy side move
16:25lower. That's how we prove if a draw on
16:27liquidity has orders in real time,
16:30right? You can do it ahead of time as
16:31well, but this is how you do it in real
16:32time. How does price respond to a higher
16:34or low? How does it respond? Right? If
16:36we move through a high, then there's
16:37nothing there. If we move through a low,
16:38there's nothing there. If we manipulate
16:40off of a high or manipulate off of a
16:41low, then we're validating it. So, we
16:43need to find a way to validate the FFE G
16:46to find our mechanical entry without
16:49getting retraced. Meaning, a closure
16:51within a wick. Not over a wick, not
16:52under a wick, in a wick. And that's what
16:55a pointer is. Basically,
16:57a candle closure within a wick range.
17:00So, this is your candle closing. This is
17:02your FFE G. Here's the previous wick.
17:04You're closing within the wick range.
17:06There's a lot of variables that are
17:07going to be involved with this though,
17:08right? It's not as straightforward as
17:10you think. It's going to be a lot of
17:11variables involved, but to identify a
17:13pointer, you can see a couple of really
17:15simple ones right here. This right here
17:17is a pointer. You see how we are closing
17:19within the wick range of the previous
17:21candle. It's like an engulfing candle
17:22essentially. I call it a pointer because
17:24an engulfing candle has nothing to do
17:25with FFEGs or any of that nonsense. A A
17:27pointer is the way it is the whole
17:30system, right? So, we are closing
17:32closing within the wick range of the
17:34previous candle. The wick here doesn't
17:36matter unless it closes outside of the
17:37wick range, then we're going to have
17:39some issues with this. We'll talk about
17:40this in the future. But, every implied
17:42move will have a pointer to start with
17:44reacting to an FFEG before the move
17:47happens. Uh you'll notice that there's a
17:49little bit of complications with this
17:50when we look at a PO3, but if you're
17:52looking at small little implied moves,
17:54we can identify there's a pointer here
17:57and there's a pointer here and then we
17:58see a move up, right? These These are
17:59These are really simple example examples
18:02of what I'm talking about, but the
18:04pointer FFEG relation is a part of every
18:06move, every single one. There's a lot of
18:09nuance with it, a lot of details that we
18:10have to get through, so let's go and and
18:12back test and just look at where these
18:14pointers exist. How and when do they
18:16happen? What do they look like? All that
18:18kind of good stuff. Let's go on the
18:18weekly time frame. I don't want you to
18:20think that I'm coming in prepared. I
18:21have no idea what the [ __ ] I'm about to
18:22show you. Um and there will be things I
18:24can't explain yet just because we we
18:26need to learn the details in order.
18:28Let's just go back, I don't know. We'll
18:29go to January. We'll go to the 5-minute
18:30time frame. Now, what time frames do we
18:32use look for pointers? Well, it depends
18:34on the type of market state you're in.
18:35If price is consolidating, really the
18:37the time frame doesn't matter. The time
18:39frame represents the the timeline of
18:42your trade. And so, if you're in a
18:43consolidated range of price, it's a
18:45small range of price. You're going to
18:46get 1-minute and 2-minute pointers. But,
18:47um on most of our trades, they're going
18:49to be between the 3- and 6-minute time
18:51frame for entries. There will be
18:522-minute pointers. There will be
18:531-minute pointers. There will be
18:547-minute pointers. But, when you're
18:56taking trade that's about an hour long,
18:583, 4, 5, and 6 6 are going to be the
19:00most reliable pointers to use as the
19:02entry condition
19:04uh base entry condition. But, again,
19:05part of the reason why I'm making the
19:06boot camp is people pattern trade
19:08pointers and they just trade take the
19:09pointer. Half Nearly 70% of using the
19:13model is understanding all the rules and
19:15all the little intricacies with it and
19:17how to apply it in detail in context.
19:18There's a lot to it. The pointer itself
19:20is just the start, just the beginning.
19:23Um it's just how we're able to take
19:24these trades. So,
19:26I want to kind of look at this leg here.
19:28We're going to look at this this this
19:29bullish leg. We see that we moved
19:31higher. We see that we validated a set
19:33of FFEGs down here. What I want to do
19:35now is I want to hop into this range
19:36price and identify when this pointer
19:38happened. We're on NQ of K. So, there
19:41are going to be some more examples where
19:43we talk about weak pointers and stuff,
19:44but just looking at NQ, let's see if we
19:46can prove rule number one. Rule number
19:48one was what? Every implied move starts
19:49and ends with a pointer. Now, if you're
19:51smart, you might realize that there's
19:52something else in here that might help
19:54explain why we saw this retrace. But,
19:56let's hop in and let's just look for a
19:573, 4, 5, or 6-minute pointer. The
19:59indicator does actually outline pointers
20:01for you. If you want the indicator, link
20:02is in the description. Link is in the
20:04comment section. Uh it's incredibly
20:06cheap, but you can turn this right here
20:08on, click enable, you can change the
20:09colors and all that stuff, and it will
20:11outline the pointers for you. This is
20:12mainly for people who are learning how
20:13to identify them for the first time. So,
20:16you you don't have to use it if you
20:17don't want to, but it's there. Um so,
20:19let's go to the 3-minute time frame and
20:20see if we can find a 3-minute pointer
20:21validating these initial FFEGs. Okay.
20:24So, we're looking for a efficient
20:26validation somewhere around those FFEGs
20:28at those lows to help explain if you're
20:30smart, you know why we started the
20:31retrace at this low. Um we want to look
20:34for some type of pointer around the area
20:36of price
20:38uh to get us in this trade. Now, let's
20:41go to ES to see if there was a pointer.
20:42Remember, they're correlated assets. See
20:44if there's a pointer at the FFEGs. I
20:45actually got to find where those FFEGs
20:46are to see if there's a way to have
20:48gotten in this trade
20:50um before the move up. No. So, in this
20:52case,
20:53um price relatively did not did not
20:56present a pure pointer. There's a reason
20:59why. Like, the pointer formed later in
21:01price. This is I wanted to make an easy
21:02example out of this.
21:04Uh this is a not as easy example because
21:06technically we're using sweep pointers
21:07and we're using continuation sweep
21:09pointers. Um so this is going to be
21:11incredibly difficult to explain. Uh but
21:13this is the first presented
21:14the first presented pointers on the
21:153-minute time frame
21:17uh
21:18on ES. There is where that pointer
21:20presented itself before the like higher.
21:22Again, I want to use a much uh easier
21:23example. So let's look for uh a move
21:25like an implied a very strong implied
21:27move that didn't have any pullback
21:28whatsoever. Like um just one pure green
21:31move or one pure black move or whatever.
21:33Um
21:35let's just go
21:37I want to use the the 9:30 window. Okay,
21:40this is a good example right here.
21:42Let's look at this uh all these implied
21:44moves. Just pure moves, no pullbacks cuz
21:46pullbacks indicate orders on the other
21:48side which indicate potential efficiency
21:50which then throw in weak pointers and
21:51that's not what we're learning today.
21:52Today I just want to prove pointers work
21:54and how they exist. So let's look at all
21:56these little implied moves. There's tons
21:57of them.
21:58Um but let's look at after the macro, uh
22:01what do we see?
22:02Well, just off the bat looking at this
22:04move to the downside, I see a 5-minute
22:06pointer closure on some probably some
22:07type of IFFEG or whatever. Let's take a
22:09look at what that was at the time. See
22:11we have a 5-minute efficient closure.
22:13Are we moving away from the FFEG? Yes.
22:16There might even be an IFFEG here as
22:17well to help explain the move. Let's go
22:19ahead and find out. We want to get as
22:21much detail on this as possible. Yeah,
22:23so we have IFFEGs in there as well. Now
22:25we have this pointer reacting to the
22:27FFEG set efficiently closing within the
22:30previous wick moving away from the
22:31inefficiency which means that basically
22:35uh Holy [ __ ] why are you being so loud
22:37right now? Oh my god. Dude, chill. I'm
22:41trying to teach these losers what a
22:42pointer is, bro, for the trillionth
22:44time. Nina,
22:46come here, [ __ ] Come here. Get your
22:48ass over here. Get your Oh my god,
22:50you're so horrible. Okay, this pointer
22:52is reacting to that inefficiency set.
22:55Why? She She was asleep for like 5 hours
22:58straight, bro.
22:59Okay, I'm going to deal with her real
23:00quick. Hold on.
23:02I took all of her [ __ ] toys away. She
23:04gets to have no more fun. Okay, so we
23:06have a pointer reacting to this FFEG set
23:08moving away from the FFEG set. Actually,
23:10let's go back to NQ because I hate ES.
23:12We're going to use both equities to
23:13trade, but again, it means the exact
23:14same thing. We'll be going over this in
23:16detail as well. Same exact thing being
23:18presented here. 5-minute pointer
23:20reacting to this FFEG set and then we
23:21see a impulse move to the downside. And
23:24then, what happens? Well, we see a move
23:26to the upside. Well, is there a way we
23:27could have gotten in this trade? Well,
23:29if we go back to ES, you'll notice that
23:30we saw a 5-minute pointer inverse here.
23:33This is another mechanical entry
23:34reacting to the IFFEG's of this buy-side
23:37sweep.
23:38You Once you get used to this
23:40trading the model, you can kind of
23:41visualize where the IFFEG's would be
23:42presented. You don't always have to
23:43switch. But yeah, you can see that we
23:46get a pointer reacting to the IFFEG's,
23:48the inverse fair value gaps of that
23:50order block, validating those
23:52inefficiencies. And so, when you start
23:54to study this, you'll notice that every
23:56implied move, every single
23:58impulse implied move that you see in the
24:00market has a pointer that started the
24:02move. Now, there's a lot of nuance with
24:04it. We're going to have weak pointers.
24:05We're going to have to talk about swept
24:07pointers. There's a bunch of uh details
24:09that we're going to have to talk about
24:10and get right cuz it's not just as
24:12straightforward as it looks right now.
24:13It looks like, "Oh [ __ ] this is like
24:14really pop like really common." We'll
24:16take a look here, you know, 5-minute
24:17pointer to the downside and then we see
24:19impulse move to the downside.
24:21Um 5-minute pointer to the upside,
24:23impulse move to the upside.
24:25Um 5-minute pointer to the upside,
24:27impulse move to the upside.
24:295-minute pointer, impulse move.
24:31That's a dick.
24:32Oh my god.
24:34I'm going to crash the [ __ ] out. Okay,
24:36let's just keep going.
24:385-minute pointer to the upside,
24:40impulse move.
24:42Uh there's probably something on ES or a
24:44lower time frame. Again, I'm only using
24:45the 5-minute time frame right now. I'm
24:46only on the 5-minute time frame. Just
24:48looking at 5-minute pointers. That's not
24:49all the only time frame we use. We can
24:51use a 3, 4, 5, and 6 for our entries. Um
24:54again, 1-minute and 2-minutes do exist
24:55in consolidations. Again, more details
24:57on this later.
24:59Pointer, in impulse move down.
25:02Pointer, impulse move up. Pointer,
25:04impulse move down. Again, it's going to
25:06get more detailed with the swept
25:07pointers, but we can do this endlessly.
25:09We can go in here and we can find
25:10pointers to explain every single implied
25:12move that you see in the market. Where
25:13it gets tricky is during consolidation
25:15windows, during accumulations, when
25:17price is essentially equally valid in
25:19the inefficiencies. That's not what
25:20today's lesson is about. We're proving
25:22pointers. What about this range in here?
25:24What about this dislike to the downside?
25:25Pretty strong leg. Let's look for a
25:273-minute pointer somewhere in here.
25:29We'll go through all of our time frames
25:30to identify the pointer. One thing as
25:33well, the indicator does come with a
25:34pointer countdown. So, when you're
25:35watching the market in real time, it'll
25:37countdown the seconds and minutes until
25:39that pointer time closes, and then
25:41you'll know if there that pointer
25:42closes. And it does actually have a
25:43feature where you can see if it does
25:46It'll tell you if a pointer closed in
25:47that time frame, for example. So, it'll
25:49tell you if like it closed bearish or if
25:50it closed bullish or whatever the case
25:51is. Nina, oh my [ __ ] god. She's
25:53biting my feet, bro. Holy [ __ ] You can
25:56kind of see if that's the case. So,
25:57we'll go to the 3-minute time frame and
25:58see if there's a pointer validating the
25:59inefficiency somewhere in the like Oh,
26:01what do we see? See how we're closing
26:02within the wick range? Now, again,
26:04ignore this wick for now. We're going to
26:05be talking about this as a called a
26:06swept pointer, but there's that pointer.
26:08I'll even outline them with um
26:10with rectangles, so you guys can kind of
26:13visualize where they appear in
26:14structure.
26:16Um
26:17I might even We'll just make this guy
26:18purple or something.
26:20Um we'll just copy and paste this
26:22drawing.
26:23Boom. And then we'll use this
26:26to talk.
26:28Boom. So, theoretically, without knowing
26:31anything about the model, the entry
26:32condition happens somewhere around uh
26:35there in price on the 3-minute time
26:36frame. Now, when would you get out of
26:37this trade? Well, it's as simple as
26:39this, right? Just bare-bones, right?
26:41None of the other rules, just
26:42bare-bones. If we know that every
26:43implied move starts and ends with a
26:44pointer, well, then your exit would be
26:47what? A pointer validating the opposite
26:49end of FVG, validating the other side of
26:51liquidity. That's the whole point,
26:53right? That's what it starts every five
26:56minutes, so wouldn't you want to get out
26:56on that? 100% but if the market's going
26:59to consolidate, the market's going to be
27:00efficient while we're in the trade, well
27:02then it's going to fail long before or
27:04during the entry condition of the next
27:06trade. So there's a lot of drawdown that
27:08you can experience or profit loss. You
27:10might have made a lot more money and
27:11then you lose a little bit more money.
27:13There's a lot of loss that can happen or
27:14a little bit of less profit. Um but
27:16again, right here you'll see she's just
27:18going nuts right now. I don't know what
27:20the [ __ ] is her deal. Uh again, right
27:22here five-minute continuation pointer
27:23reacting to this FFEG set, impulse move
27:26to the upside. You can see right there.
27:27Boom. Um so let's see when this trade
27:30technically fails, the bias fails to the
27:33downside. Let's just wait right there.
27:35Notice how
27:37price behaves differently, completely
27:39characteristically differently than this
27:40move to the downside. Clear market state
27:42shift to the downside and then what
27:44changes? Well, we have a five-minute
27:45pointer reacting to this FFEG set.
27:47There's a lot more detail to this as
27:48well, but we have a pointer reacting to
27:50an FFEG and suddenly the price behaves
27:52completely different, right? It's
27:54because we're validating this
27:55inefficiency and we're stuck in the
27:56inefficiency. More details to come. But
27:59the pointer is the basic um structure
28:01for what causes you to change. So let's
28:03outline this compared to what we with
28:05the knowledge that we have now, right?
28:07We use the FFEG to essentially get the
28:10total flow change. The volume comes from
28:12the FFEG area in price, right? Somewhere
28:15in this FFEG, we pull into this FFEG. I
28:18think we come in here, we tap the FFEG,
28:20and then we create the pointer
28:21confirming the
28:23Nina, get your ass out of the cords,
28:26bro.
28:27Holy [ __ ] Then we get the confirmation
28:29of that volume with the pointer and we
28:31get in without being able to be
28:32retraced, meaning price can continue
28:33past our entry without automatically
28:36inviting a retracement because of the
28:38inefficiency. We get in on the pointer
28:40and then we get out on the pointer. Now
28:41obviously, there's a lot more to it, but
28:44still you can see the general skeleton
28:45guide of how this is going to work.
28:48Let's go and and find some more examples
28:50of implied moves during New York that
28:52kind of are easy to explain. Now, this
28:54is going to get complicated in here cuz
28:55we see a lot of pullbacks during the
28:57entire process, right? So, you're like,
28:58how do we deal with all this [ __ ] See
28:59bullish pointer or bearish pointer?
29:01Well, we're going to get there, but not
29:02in today's video. Today's video is
29:03proving during the most relevant points
29:06of price action cuz this is how I did
29:07it, right? I said, well, let me study
29:10all of the big moves that happened in
29:11history and let me figure out what
29:12happens. And this is the case every
29:14single time. And we can use a lot of
29:16filtering to take better and better
29:18trades. Let's go to the beginning of the
29:20session.
29:21Um look at this, right? 5-minute
29:23pointer, 5-minute efficient validation
29:25of this FVG happens right here. There's
29:28your pointer. Boom. Dump.
29:32Uh it happened after macro, too. Dumps.
29:34Price dumps. We never get a pointer. We
29:36never get a pointer, the move is not
29:38sustained.
29:39Uh in fact, we just continue to dump and
29:41the bias is maintained. So, you would
29:42never have exited.
29:43Um and then PO3, we'll talk about this
29:45later on, but no clear implied moves.
29:48So, we're not going to study any of
29:48this. Actually, we can study this.
29:50Pretty clear implied move here.
29:52Um and there's a reason why there's a
29:54clear a clear implied move here,
29:56um which we're going to talk about later
29:57on with how PO3s get canceled or how
29:59accumulations get breakouts on them.
30:02Let's look at this range, this implied
30:04move, and see if there was a way There's
30:06two trades I see here, a couple trades I
30:07see here that are actually really good.
30:10Um but let's see if we can identify
30:11which pointer we could have entered on
30:13at these lows. And then we have a bunch
30:14in here. We have uh two that we could
30:16have entered on. Uh two 3-minute
30:19pointers looking at the 4-minute
30:20timeframe. A 4-minute pointer. Nina, for
30:22[ __ ] sake, she's pulling the monitor
30:24cord out.
30:25Get your ass in your bed. Holy [ __ ]
30:29She's stressing me out. And a 5-minute
30:30pointer. Bunch of pointers at the the
30:31low end of the move, and then we see
30:33what? Impulse move to the upside. But
30:34you see this chop, you're like, well,
30:35what the [ __ ] How'd you know there's a
30:37bunch of pointers in here? How'd you
30:38know this one was going to be decent
30:39enough to take? That's where we get into
30:41our PO3 rules about non-associated
30:43draws, which we'll talk about later.
30:45Then we see this implied move to the
30:46upside, and when do we see
30:47characteristics that are not associated
30:49with the previous implied move? Well, it
30:51happens conveniently after we get
30:53presented with a new pointer to the
30:54downside. And then we see a move to the
30:56downside, and then we get another
30:57pointer to the upside, and then we see
30:58an implied move to the upside, and then
31:00we get another pointer to the downside.
31:01And again, I'm only on this one time
31:02frame, but you can see what I mean,
31:03right? The pointer is a structural
31:06reaction to an FFE G that will come
31:08before every implied move. Um so, the
31:10trick is knowing when and when not to
31:11take them. All right, let's look at this
31:13implied move here.
31:14What do we see? Whole set of pointers in
31:16there. Like, it's hard to it's hard to
31:18to not see that, right? We see a whole
31:21set of pointers in there. Okay, 5-minute
31:23pointer is the most obvious. We'll go to
31:24the 3-minute time frame. Oh, [ __ ] me. I
31:26did not There we go. Let's go here.
31:29Okay, 3-minute time frame, bunch of
31:323-minute pointers. Go to our 4-minute
31:33time frame.
31:34Um one 4-minute pointer, 6-minute time
31:36frame.
31:39>> [snorts]
31:41>> Come on, [ __ ]
31:42Okay, so it's really just like a bunch
31:43of three, four, and five minute time uh
31:45time frame pointers. And they happen,
31:47and then implied move to the downside.
31:49Now, there are continuation pointers as
31:51well that happen in structure. The way I
31:53want you to think about it is that the
31:54FFE G are the wires,
31:56and the or the FFE Gs are the wires,
31:59liquidity is the electricity, and the
32:01pointer is essentially what connects two
32:03wires to one another, right? You want to
32:05imagine that the point the the FFE Gs
32:08are
32:09um
32:09separated from one another, right?
32:10Supply and demand are separated from one
32:12another, and the pointer is the glue.
32:13It's the It allows It's like the switch.
32:15It's the on-off switch that allows
32:17electricity to flow from the FFE G to
32:19the other FFE G, from supply to demand,
32:21from demand to supply. Electricity can
32:23flow through that flow through that when
32:25the pointer is switched on in that
32:27direction. If you don't have a pointer,
32:28you will never have an implied move.
32:30Every single implied move has a pointer
32:32attached to it. Again, take a look in
32:34this area and volume. We didn't really
32:35see too much going on until we had
32:38presented a pointer and then we see
32:40implied move to the upside. And again, I
32:42am cherry-picking, 100% but this is what
32:45I had to do in order to build out a
32:47successful model. What works and then
32:49how do I filter out the bad trades?
32:51That's how every model should start.
32:53Okay, what do we see? 5-minute pointer
32:54reacting to probably some high FPGs in
32:56here. Okay, 5-minute pointer impulse
32:58move, 5-minute pointer impulse move into
33:00chop. Talk about that later on. 5-minute
33:02pointer move to the downside. Okay, but
33:04I just want to show you that these
33:05signal all of the moves that you'll see.
33:07Pointers move to the downside. This is a
33:10lot of chop.
33:12We're looking here though just in case
33:13to see if there's something
33:15that we could looked at.
33:22Come on, dude.
33:234-minute time frame is always rough to
33:25load in.
33:276-minute pointer at the low here.
33:286-minute pointer
33:30right there.
33:31Move to the upside.
33:36You can look at this if you want to.
33:393-minute pointer move to the downside.
33:41Bunch of pointers in here, you can see
33:43them.
33:45Hello.
33:46I lost the price.
33:48Go in here.
33:49Really, really pure move.
33:523-minute pointer.
33:55Wick range closure. Don't worry about
33:56the sweeps for now.
33:58That's where it gets complicated. Sweeps
33:59get complicated. SMT pointers get
34:01complicated. Yeah, 3 and 6-minute
34:04pointers all in there.
34:05What about this impulse move to the
34:06downside?
34:10No 3-minute.
34:12Check your 4-minute.
34:19Check your 6-minute.
34:21Check your 5-minute. Okay, so what we're
34:23seeing is we're we're seeing a move to
34:25the downside. Whoops.
34:27We're seeing a move to the downside.
34:29We're not seeing a pointer. So, what we
34:30want to do is we want to go check the
34:31other equity.
34:33So, we're going to go check ES. They're
34:35correlated pairs. Check ES and see if we
34:37had a pointer somewhere in price before
34:39the implied move.
34:41Uh 3-minute, 4-minutes.
34:46Come on.
34:49Uh 4-minute pointer right there.
34:514-minute pointer. So, you can see how we
34:53can start to begin to use this. Now,
34:54this is also London, so this is
34:56What the [ __ ] Yeah, you don't want to
34:58be trading that [ __ ] but still.
35:00Pointers are a part of every single move
35:01right here.
35:035-minute pointer, probably reacting to
35:05an FFG of some sort. Who knows, but it's
35:06invalidated at this point. And impulse
35:08move higher. Okay?
35:10Uh let's look for some more clean moves
35:12and then we'll go ahead and get out of
35:12here.
35:14Uh okay, right here. 5-minute 5-minute
35:16pointer right here move to the downside.
35:175-minute continuation pointer move to
35:18the downside. 5-minute uh manipulation
35:21pointer move to the upside.
35:235-minute [snorts]
35:24continuation pointer move to the
35:25downside.
35:27Um pointer downside.
35:30>> [sighs]
35:31>> Pointer upside into chop.
35:33More to come on that later on.
35:36Um let's look at more 9:30 moves.
35:40The big idea I want you to understand is
35:42you're not going to get a keyword
35:44sustained. You're not going to get a
35:45fully sustained move unless price
35:47presents a pointer. You might get
35:49manipulative price in a direction in in
35:51in range, but it's not going to be
35:52sustained and it never will be sustained
35:54unless there was a pointer presented
35:55before or during that move. Sometimes if
35:58you're in a consolidated range of price
36:00and you're using the 3, 4, 5, and
36:016-minute time frames, you're not going
36:02to be able to find an entry because
36:04price is simply just going to have a lot
36:05of volume. We talked about this in
36:07episodes 1, 2, and 3 basically. You're
36:09not going to have enough volume
36:11or you're going to have so much volume
36:12that that is in such a small space that
36:14by the time the 3, 4, 5, and 6 close,
36:16you won't have a pointer and then you
36:17have to take a continuation pointer.
36:19Basically, what I mean is if price is
36:20compressing in a super small range, then
36:23by the time those time frames close,
36:25you've already moved out of the range
36:26and then you can just enter on a
36:27continuation pointer, which is actually
36:29better when looking at a continuation of
36:32an accumulation. Um, let's look at
36:34another
36:35New York, and then we're going to get
36:36out of here.
36:38Uh, this will work.
36:40Boom. This is the This is the most clean
36:42[ __ ] ever. Look, 5-minute pointer move
36:44to the downside.
36:465-minute pointer move to the upside. 5
36:48Um,
36:49not a pointer, but we can look for other
36:51pointers.
36:52There will be
36:54somewhere in here, whether it's SMT,
36:56whether it's continuation, whether it's
36:59uh, whatever the case is, we can look
37:00for one. It looks like this might be a
37:02continuation pointer move. We have a
37:043-minute continuation here. Notice how
37:05we have accumulation before this move.
37:07You see how we price accumulated, and
37:08then we had a continuation pointer and
37:10then volume. This is exactly what I was
37:12just talking about. It's pretty funny
37:13how that works. I was just talking about
37:14this, right? We have the displacement, a
37:16lot of volume before. When you see
37:18volume and no pointers, that typically
37:20means accumulation again. We're going to
37:21have a whole video on reading
37:22accumulation, so we know not to trade or
37:24how to trade it, all that good stuff. We
37:26can even look at the ESC. There's
37:27something before this, but I doubt it.
37:29Sometimes just how the accumulation
37:30should shake down.
37:32Um, but I highly doubt it, though.
37:34Yeah, I mean, we're not seeing anything.
37:35We didn't get anything until down here,
37:37and then we see a little bit of
37:37displacement, and then we see a a
37:39pullback, right? Pullbacks will not be
37:40maintained unless you have a pointer,
37:42though, right? So, it's just not going
37:43to You're not going to see sustained
37:44volume unless you get a pointer, or
37:46unless we're bombing the [ __ ] out of
37:47Iran, I guess, basically, in this
37:49market. Like, who gives a [ __ ] Um, none
37:52of these are really that I mean, these
37:54are These are very very small moves, but
37:55you can kind of see you get the point
37:57here. Get a little bit down and dirty
37:58with the [ __ ] 5-minute pointer move to
38:00the downside. 5-minute pointer move to
38:02the upside, right? So, practice this. Go
38:04on your charts. Go in and find impulse
38:06moves. Find or implied moves. Go and
38:08find these implied moves. Big range
38:10moves. No pullbacks. Just for now. Just
38:12basically A+ setups, right? Where we see
38:15a lot of volume coming from one place to
38:16another place. You don't have to know
38:18[ __ ] yet. Get the indicator, and pair it
38:21up with the pointer, pair it up with the
38:22F F E G and just find moves that are
38:24strong, right? The whole point of
38:25trading is you take good moves. So,
38:26start with the good moves. Learn how to
38:28filter out the bad trades. Start with
38:30the good, right? What's the point of
38:32having a strategy that's super
38:33meticulous if you can't even prove that
38:36it the foundation and what it's best
38:38performing outcome would look like.
38:41The whole point of this episode is to
38:42prove that what you're about to learn is
38:44incredibly powerful and we just need to
38:46filter [ __ ] out, right? Five minute
38:47pointer, move to the downside, right? Um
38:50no pointer, no move There might have
38:51been a lower time frame one in there if
38:52I'm being honest, just given the amount
38:54of volume in there. Um five minute
38:57pointer, little move. Uh five minute
38:59pointer, little bit of move. Very, very
39:00small, but it's still
39:02Um
39:04do one more one more day and then we'll
39:06get out of here.
39:08But go in, go and find implied moves,
39:10pair them up with pointers, pair them
39:11with F F E Gs and see Prove it to
39:13yourself. Don't let me just Don't let
39:15the person that is teaching you prove
39:17it. Go prove it yourself, right? Don't
39:19trust me. Take a look. Pointer reacting
39:21F F E G. I mean, we can go back and
39:23figure out what it's reacting to if you
39:25want to see in real time. Five minute
39:26pointer, efficiently validating this F F
39:28E G. We can see if there is an I F F E G
39:30to explain the move. Uh I have B A D J
39:33on, so this might be a little bit
39:34[ __ ] Okay, yeah. We'll check E S.
39:39Okay, yeah. So, in this case we are
39:41validating a I F F E G. Okay, so my bad.
39:44We have an S M T pointer. When I say S M
39:46T pointer, what this means is a pointer
39:47on one equity and not the other.
39:50Uh this rule was kind of has some cool
39:51lore to it. Um when I discovered that
39:53rule, that was one of the main
39:54contributing reasons why I dropped out.
39:56If you don't know, that's the biggest
39:58reason why I dropped out is cuz once I
39:59realized that I was just trading on one
40:01equity and I'm like, why the [ __ ] is
40:02there a move it but there was no
40:03pointer?
40:04And then I looked at the other equity
40:05and there was a pointer and I'm like,
40:06[ __ ] I discovered gold. And so we get a
40:09pointer and then we get an implied move
40:10to the upside, right? Very, very strong
40:12implied move, okay? And this is never
40:14going to end until So a pointer
40:15invalidating uh,
40:17some other range in price. And there we
40:18go, 3-minute pointer to the downside is
40:20probably some more in there that we can
40:22look at. Um, looks like just a 3-minute
40:23in there. Just a 3-minute.
40:25And there might have been something on
40:26the other equity as well.
40:28Um,
40:29any really strong moves nearby that we
40:31can look at?
40:32Pretty choppy there.
40:35Uh,
40:36New York's going to be the best to kind
40:37of teach this cuz you can see just the
40:39best high-quality examples. There's very
40:40small little moves in there that you can
40:42kind of see.
40:43Um, right here, 5-minute pointer move to
40:45the downside. Um, yeah, you're never
40:47going to get a sustained move unless you
40:48have a pointer. So go in, prove it to
40:50yourself, go in, and find the efficient
40:51validations. Remember, you're looking
40:53for wick range, candle closure, reacting
40:56to an FFEG or IFFEG. They are treated
40:58equally. So that being said,
41:00basically, this is your answer to what a
41:03pointer is, okay? It's asked all the
41:05time. Basically, it's tortured me since
41:08I invented it. Um,
41:10and so hopefully, this is the last video
41:11I have to make re-explaining what a
41:13[ __ ] pointer is. This is what I swear
41:15to god I hope it is, but if you have any
41:16questions, let me know in the comments
41:18below. Uh, I'm looking forward to making
41:19the next episode, episode number seven.
41:21We're coming hard
41:23with these episodes, and hopefully, you
41:25are, too. So, get the indicator, join
41:27the Discord. Not much to it, boys. Um, I
41:29have a really, really, really cool video
41:31coming very, very soon. I'm trying to
41:33work some details out. I have three
41:35really, really cool videos coming very,
41:36very soon. I'm going back to my hometown
41:38in like two or three weeks. Got a
41:40surprise for my mom. I'm going to go
41:42spend a lot of [ __ ] money on a watch
41:44and fit, all types of [ __ ] We're going
41:46to spend some rackies, spend the pointer
41:48money. And then, I also have a bunch of
41:50psych videos on the way, too. I've been
41:52filming bits and pieces. I have a week
41:53in the life vlog coming. We got all
41:55types of [ __ ] coming. So stay tuned.
41:57That being said, enjoy your night.
41:59And yeah, that's it. Deuces.