Full transcript
0:00Trump is launching an attack against the
0:03Labour government and Andy Burnham right
0:06now, this moment. He has been trying
0:09with everything in his bone to get NATO
0:12countries like us, like the United
0:13Kingdom, like other countries, like
0:15Germany and the Netherlands as well, to
0:17spend more on our military, to spend
0:19more on our own defense, because
0:20frankly, the American taxpayer has been
0:23subsidizing other NATO allies defense
0:25for decades and Trump doesn't like it.
0:28And that's a perfectly reasonable
0:30assertion to make. The American taxpayer
0:32should not be paying for the defense of
0:34Britain or France or Germany or Poland
0:36or any other country, but he's taken it
0:38further. After seeing how this Labour
0:41government are about to renege on their
0:42commitment to raise our GDP
0:45our defense spending in as a proportion
0:47of GDP up to 3% or he has launched an
0:50attack against us trying to force our
0:51own Labour government to reconsider and
0:54to adequately fund our armed forces.
0:56He is threatening to support Argentina's
0:59claim for the Falkland Islands, which if
1:01that happened, would be one of the most
1:03unpopular things imaginable for British
1:06voters. It would terrify the Labour
1:08government what they're seeing right
1:10here, because they don't really have an
1:11argument against this. They're sending
1:13away hundreds of billions of pounds
1:15every year to foreigners, to non-Brits
1:18in the form of NHS care or council
1:20housing that's given to them for free or
1:22even just outright money handed over to
1:24these foreigners, whether they're in our
1:26country or in foreign aid outside of our
1:29country either. We could be adequately
1:31funding our armed forces. Andy Burnham
1:33and this Labour government are making a
1:34conscious decision to not and that could
1:36end up us losing control of the Falkland
1:38Islands, which would destroy the Labour
1:40party forever.
1:42Now, if you want the news the legacy
1:43media won't show you, like and comment
1:45under this video for the algorithm and
1:47subscribe to the channel as well. And
1:49make sure you don't miss my exclusive
1:51report into the scale of the Muslim
1:53takeover of our prisons in the UK that I
1:55released just last night. Sadly, it's
1:57something I just can't post on YouTube
1:59as my channel will get censored. So, I
2:01posted it onto my Substack instead, and
2:03you can join for free by clicking the
2:04link down below in the description. So,
2:06click that link in the description right
2:07now, join my Substack for free, and see
2:10that exclusive report.
2:13Trump is reviewing the United States'
2:15position on the Falkland Islands. The
2:17comments mark the first time a US
2:19president has ever publicly addressed
2:21the sovereignty of the Falkland Islands
2:23amid a defense spending row. Let's have
2:26a listen quickly
2:28to what Trump actually said.
2:32>> You're reviewing the US position on the
2:34Falkland Islands.
2:35>> I always review every position. That's
2:38just one of many.
2:40>> So, there we are. He is actively
2:41reviewing the position of the United
2:44States on who owns the Falkland Islands,
2:46threatening essentially to stop
2:48supporting us if we don't adequately
2:50defend ourselves.
2:52Donald Trump has said he is reviewing
2:54the United States' position on Britain's
2:56over the Falkland Islands amid a row
2:58over defense spending. Asked on Monday
3:00whether he was reviewing Washington's
3:01position on neutrality on the South
3:03Atlantic territory, he said, "I always
3:05review my position. That is just one of
3:07many." Last week, The Telegraph reported
3:09that the US could oppose Britain's claim
3:12to sovereignty over the islands as an
3:14incentive to try and force Andy
3:15Burnham's government to spend more on
3:17defense. The proposal was among measures
3:20being drawn up by senior defense
3:21officials at the Pentagon to incentivize
3:24Britain to hit NATO's target for members
3:26to spend 5% of GDP on defense. We're of
3:29course never going to hit 5% under a
3:31Labour or Conservative government. We're
3:32not even going to hit 3% under a Labour
3:35or Conservative government, which is the
3:37current scandal that we're sitting
3:38through.
3:40This is the first time Trump has
3:41publicly commented on the sovereignty of
3:43the Falklands, which is likely to cause
3:45alarm in Downing Street. He really drags
3:48his feet on the 3% defense spending
3:51target, not even close to that 5% that
3:53Trump is pushing for.
3:56He's refused to set out a timetable for
3:58raising defense spending to 3% of GDP by
4:012030, which essentially means it's never
4:03going to happen. In an interview with
4:05The Times, Mr. Healey said the
4:06government would set a clear target date
4:08for reaching 3% at the spending review,
4:10but didn't commit to achieving it by
4:122030, which means it's never going to
4:14happen. For the first time at that
4:16spending review, we will set out a clear
4:18path about how we will meet 20 uh 3.5%
4:21of GDP by 2035. Now, why is he talking
4:24about something in almost 10 years when
4:27he's in power now? And why is he talking
4:28about 3 and 1/2% when we're only asking
4:30for 3% right now? Well, he's not going
4:32to give us the 3% by 2030, and he knows
4:35full well the Labour government, they're
4:37never going to win another general
4:38election and end up in power until 2035,
4:41so they can set whatever commitments
4:42they want for 10 years in the future.
4:44They won't be there to deliver on them,
4:46which means this is essentially, in
4:47their mind at least, a
4:48get-out-of-jail-free card. Officials in
4:51Washington believe that whilst Britain
4:53has the potential to be a leading
4:55defense partner, the defense investment
4:57plan announced by Keir Starmer in June
4:59is not enough of a step in the right
5:01direction. Basically, it's too weak. A
5:04senior US official told The Telegraph
5:06that Britain was likely to receive
5:07special attention in Washington's review
5:09of its allies' commitment to NATO, which
5:11will examine whether member nations have
5:13credible path towards the target.
5:15Basically, they're going to analyze our
5:17entire economy and our entire government
5:19budget and hold our feet to the fire
5:22over the fact that our government
5:23refused to adequately defend our own
5:25armed forces. The US so far officially
5:28adopts a position of neutrality over who
5:30holds sovereignty over the Falklands,
5:32whilst recognizing the UK's
5:33administration of the islands.
5:35Argentina, of course, also lay claim to
5:37the Falklands, but that is something no
5:40Brit will ever willingly give up, unless
5:42of course that Brit is a member of the
5:44Labour Party.
5:46In a leaked memo, an internal Pentagon
5:49memo leaked in April first suggested the
5:51US may use a potential review of its
5:53Falklands stance as diplomatic leverage
5:56against Britain. Marco Rubio, the
5:58Secretary of State, played down the leak
6:00as a minor internal decision. However,
6:02the Telegraph understands the discussion
6:04about using the Falklands as leverage is
6:06still ongoing in the Pentagon, and it's
6:08clear that Donald Trump has been a part
6:10of those discussions as well, and he's
6:12on board at least with the idea of
6:13considering this as he just came out and
6:16said as such. A senior Pentagon official
6:18said last week, "I would expect the UK
6:20to receive special attention because it
6:21has so much potential. We will therefore
6:23continue efforts to incentivize and
6:25enable the UK to step up in a major
6:28way."
6:29Trump's administration is pushing NATO
6:30into what officials describe as a new
6:32era of the alliance dubbed NATO 3.0.
6:36This would require European countries
6:37and Canada to take take primary
6:40responsibility for the conventional
6:41defense of Europe, which is actually
6:43fair enough if we consider that the
6:46United States of America, they're going
6:47to take primary responsibility for the
6:50defense against China. I think the rest
6:52of Europe combined can afford to take on
6:55Russia if we need to, but of course, our
6:57governments are too bankrupt both
6:59economically, politically, and morally.
7:01They would much rather give migrants
7:04free money who come into our country
7:05than they would adequately defend our
7:07own armed forces.
7:09To achieve this, officials have drawn up
7:11incentives designed to strike anxiety
7:13into world leaders enough to force them
7:16to increase defense spending.
7:18The Pentagon's top policy official held
7:20talks with NATO allies in Brussels
7:22regarding the extent and speed of the US
7:24military withdrawal from Europe. He
7:26warned some member states had to move
7:28faster to replace weapon systems that
7:30had long been provided by Washington to
7:31keep Europe secure. During closed-door
7:33talks with NATO ambassadors, Mr. Colby
7:35warned that countries that were behind
7:37would continue feeling pressure from
7:39Washington to increase their military
7:41expenditure. That's the United Kingdom.
7:43That is referring directly to us.
7:46The threat to oppose Britain's
7:47sovereignty over the Falklands was
7:49seized upon by some senior Israelis,
7:51including Benjamin Netanyahu's son, on
7:53Friday. Yair Netanyahu, a 35-year-old
7:56podcast and political activist, posted
7:58on X, "The Falklands belong to
8:00Argentina" in Spanish. Now, this isn't
8:02exactly surprising. Israel and Argentina
8:05are extremely close because of Israel's
8:06large Argentine Jewish community and the
8:09leadership of Javier Milei, the
8:10staunchly pro-Israel president who's an
8:12ally of Mr. Trump and sits on the board
8:14of peace. Because of this, pro-Israeli
8:16Republicans in Washington have quietly
8:18argued for months that the US should
8:20rethink its position of neutrality,
8:22believing that Britain is becoming a
8:23less reliable ally. Mr. Burnham's
8:25increasingly punitive approach towards
8:27Israel, including a robust package of
8:29sanctions and a trade ban targeting
8:31Israeli settlements in the occupied West
8:32Bank, may lead Israel to push the
8:34Falklands issue harder in Washington.
8:37Now, my thoughts, my opinions on Israel
8:39and Palestine are basically irrelevant
8:41because that's my thoughts and opinions.
8:43I don't care. I do not care what Israel
8:46does. I do not care what Palestine or
8:48what Gaza does. It's not my business. I
8:50don't care what happens in that part of
8:52the world. However, it is worth stating
8:54that Israel isn't a real ally of the
8:56United Kingdom. Back in 1982, when
8:59Argentina invaded the Falkland Islands,
9:01Israel continued to sell weapons to the
9:04Argentinians so they could bomb our
9:06ships and kill British service service
9:08personnel. So, as far as I'm concerned,
9:10Israel are not an ally of the United
9:12Kingdom, and we should not care what
9:13they think or what they do, and no
9:15British service personnel should ever
9:17put their lives at risk for the sake of
9:19Israel. America, on the other hand,
9:21absolutely are a staunch and firm ally
9:23of the United Kingdom, and they are 100%
9:26right when they encourage us to
9:28adequately fund our armed forces. It has
9:30to be done, and it is nothing less than
9:32cowardice and treason from our
9:34government and our politicians that they
9:35refuse to adequately fund our armed
9:37forces.
9:38Now, if you want the news the legacy
9:39media won't show you, like and comment
9:41under this video for the algorithm, and
9:43subscribe to the channel as well. And of
9:45course, make sure to join my free
9:47Substack to see the reports about the
9:49Muslim takeover of our prisons in the UK
9:51that I'm simply not allowed to post onto
9:53YouTube. It's 100% free to join. Just
9:55click the link in the description down
9:56below, and sign up now to see the truth
9:58about the Muslim takeover of our prisons
10:00in the United Kingdom.